December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

NOISE jamming...
by Dave Emery 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Steve Schear wrote : > > A single jammer is an easy target but multiple coordinated jammers are a > different story. My group did some work at TRW on this. Suffice it to say > that just a few well coordinted jammers can make DFing even with satellite > systems very, very, hard. There is quite a bit of emitter location technology around, including much designed to work from airborne platforms that would likely be deployed as soon as possible. Seen from the air coordinated jammers would likely be widely separted spacially even if they weren't as seen from the DSN antenna. And an airborne platform can get very much closer to one emitter (where its signal predominates) than others making separating its energy from the rest much easier. But yes, a very sophisticated jamming effort sync'd up with GPS timing and using multiple sites would be something that undoubtably would knock out a station for a while as countermeasures to such an attack are not part of operational plans for civilian science research ground sites. But many of those sites have several dishes of various sizes with feeds at the downlink frequency and a dish with 50 or 60 db of gain and tenth of a degree beamwidth would do fairly well at isolating a single jammer azimuth and elevation by searching for and pointing right at it. Perhaps it even would be possible to use two dishes separted by enough distance to trianglulate. > > > > > But most of the time Mars is visible from more than one DSN > >earth station and given the high priority of the mission the most > >likely thing would just be to switch stations to one a third of > >the way around the globe or more. Would obviously be a nuisance > >and get some people very mad, but since the ground stations fail > >from natural causes from time to time such a handover would be > >fairly routine. > > Which means you'd need to jam all the stations as they came into view. > Certainly not the work of a lone hacker. Hell if you are dead set at disrupting more or less pure science (mixed with a bit of budget sales pitch) why not rent a Rider truck loaded with ANFO ? or a HERF device ? or simply start shooting at the antenna with a heavy gauge machine gun ? Or to be subtler and more stealthy, cut the fiber optic telco cables connecting the site with the NASA network using nothing more than a ordinary shovel and a bolt cutter in some out of the way spot. Many cable routes are well marked... and you could dress up as the gas company or water and sewer department and nobody would think twice about seeing you dig a hole by the side of the road. > > Yep, I just thought they might employ FH to avoid the odd noise blips from > terrestrial sources (even with reservation of the bands), although SS > usually increases front-end bandwidth and lowers sensitivity, > selectivity, etc. With link margins already low it probably doen't pay. > Hopping no, But they have sometimes used direct sequence spreading because it supplies a very accurate high resolution ranging yardstick (as in the case of GPS which works exactly that way). > >> > > > And would be spotted almost instantly on spectrum analyzers and > >other monitors. > > They'd certainly see the signal, but as I said above a coordinated attack > from several transmitters can be exceedingly difficult to find, even by > national technical means. Again, there are lots of flying (not orbiting) platforms with various antennas and DF receivers that can do this sort of thing. And they can fly any pattern that might be useful and look for interesting visual, passive IR, and side looking radar observable objects on the ground. Obtaining a rough (degree or so) direction on the jammers would be fairly easy using standard EMI horn and dish antennas or the automated equivalent on military ELINT vehicles unless the jammers were using very many sites closely spaced together and phase and frequency coherent signals from all the sites. And certainly sweeping the horizon with a big dish would likely yield significant location information simply becuase of the very narrow beam width of the dish's main lobe. Dave Emery die(a)die.com Weston, Mass.

1 0

Make $$$ with 800 Phone Numbers
by claudine＠adultpatrol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Intended for Adult Webmasters. If you have received this in error, please accept our apologizes and simply click on "REPLY" and type "REMOVE" in the "SUBJECT BOX" once you have done this, you will never receive another email from us. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tired of getting only .20 per minute on your Pay Per Call Numbers ? How about .90 per minute !!! Well, we the owners of Adult Patrol are now offering this service on 1-800 Pay Per Call Numbers. Offering both Live Female and Gay Male Services. Just visit or new Pay Per Call Section at: http://www.adultpatrol.com/phonesex/ and get the details on some of the highest pay outs in the industry. Hope to see you there, Claudine Adult Patrol Admin http://www.adultpatrol.com/phonesex

1 0

http://hipcrime.home.ml.org
by cypherpunks＠Algebra.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is NOT a commercial message. Thanks.

1 0

hi
by Moreno Daltin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

hi everybody !

5 5

Income Tax News - July 4th Edition
by FutureGate Web Services 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Happy 4th of July!! I hope your celebration is going well. I am celebrating with a special announcement of the new expanded TaxBuster Guide. Although the second addition contains much new information on how you can lawfully opt out of the Federal income tax system, the price for access to the web-site will remain at $9.95 to celebrate the 221st birthday of the Declaration of Independence. If you have ever wanted to study this powerful information now is the best time, visit the TaxBuster Guide at: http://www.futuregate.com/tax_buster You will also find links to other great sites like: AutoBuy - The Buyer's Resource Marie's Country Music Island FutureGate's Best WWW Hosting and Web-Site Promotion The Watkins Products Catalog - Online ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To be removed from any future mailings, just reply with REMOVE in the subject line.

1 0

Re: Clinton nixes domestic encryption right
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text X-Sender: tbell(a)cato.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 17:10:46 -0400 Reply-To: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA-L(a)LISTSERV.AOL.COM> Sender: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA-L(a)LISTSERV.AOL.COM> From: "Tom W. Bell" <tbell(a)CATO.ORG> Subject: Re: Clinton nixes domestic encryption right To: CYBERIA-L(a)LISTSERV.AOL.COM Phill writes: >Stuart Baker claims that Gore is the main administration supporter of GAK. >But others have claimed the exact opposite. I suspect that if Gore really >supported the GAK idea he would do so publically and explicitly, its a vote >winner. For what it's worth, I had dinner Monday with two people from Gore's office and one of Microsoft's officers. The Gore people consistently demanded mandatory key escrow, though they seemed willing to allow private parties to do the job so long as GAK remained an option. The Microsoft person only went so far as to offer to always make key escrow a *feature*, arguing that this would in practice get the administration all the GAK it wants because almost everyone would want to escrow their private keys. The debate unfolded something like this: Gore people: "People using really strong encryption will *want* to escrow their keys. Otherwise, lost keys will result in irretrievably lost data." MS person: "Oh, sure--especially commerical players. But you underestimate the amount of resistance *mandated* escrowing will create. People want to *choose* to escrow. If you let them, they will." Gore people: "Well, if they're going to escrow anyhow, what's the problem with mandating it?" MS person: "You don't get it. Our customers care deeply about their encryption rights, and we want happy customers. If the administration will just back off, it will get what it wants--or, at least, as much as it can at any rate expect." It presented a classic case of cultural conflict--in this case, political cultural confronting commercial culture. Tom W. Bell ----------- tbell(a)cato.org Director, Telecommunications and Technology Studies The Cato Institute --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/

2 1

index.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

News Destination Mars: Special Section 3700 hotels worldwide- click here for immediate on-line reservations Search and Feedback NEWS Passenger dragged half-naked from plane lavatory sues lavatory lawsuit graphic July 3, 1997 Web posted at: 5:07 p.m. EDT (2107 GMT) NEW YORK (AP) -- Caught with his pants down on a trans-Atlanticflight, a New York businessman insists he is innocent. Raviv Laor says he was dragged from the bathroom of an AirFrance plane with his trousers around his ankles and toilet paperin his hand because a flight attendant wrongly thought he wassneaking a smoke. Laor, who says a malfunctioning smoke alarm went off, is suingthe airline for $12 million for his humiliation. He says he went tocourt after failing to get an apology or even a reply from theairline. Air France said Thursday that it was reviewing Laor's allegationsand would "respond in due course in the appropriate forum" afterconducting its own investigation. 'The depth of my embarrassment I cannot begin to describe' The lawsuit, filed last month in Manhattan Supreme Court,asserts that 20 minutes into a flight from Paris to Newark Airporton May 19, crew members broke into the locked lavatory andassaulted Laor. "The crew members then, while Laor was naked from the waistdown, dragged him outside the lavatory, exposing his genitals andother body parts to many seated passengers, both female and male,"the lawsuit said. "I was terrified," said Laor, 28, who owns a computer servicescompany. "My first reaction was 'My God, something must havehappened to the plane.'" "The depth of my embarrassment I cannot begin to describe," hesaid. Laor says he neither smokes nor drinks, and had opted for anonsmoking flight. He said his protestations were answered with a threat that hewould be arrested for arguing with the crew. The flight purser "told me I did not have the right to expectprivacy" and complained that Americans were "always screamingabout their rights," Laor said. "An official apology from Air France would have made adifference, but now too much time has elapsed," Laor says. Copyright 1997 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. rule Note: Pages will open in a new browser window. Related story: * Flight attendant secondhand smoke trial under way - June 2, 1997 Related site: * Air France To Top © 1997 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you.

1 0

SET and dual use
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Sender: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com Reply-To: ptharrison <ptharrison(a)delphi.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Date: Thu, 03 Jul 1997 23:01:00 -0400 From: ptharrison <ptharrison(a)delphi.com> To: Multiple recipients of <e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com> Subject: SET and dual use -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The Worldwide Conspiracy of International Bankers is now engaged in an unprecedented attack on the Nation State. Last month, a so-called consortium of very large banks and their lackies the branded credit card companies issued a detailed plan to put strong cryptography into the hands of every statistically creditworthy human being on the planet. In issuing the Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) protocol, this cabal of transnational, stateless seekers of interest income and acquisition discounts have detailed a plan by which every merchant which accepts credit cards, every institution which issues them, and incredibly every individual who posesses them would be able to register and share public keys. Going far beyond the puny efforts of the "cypherpunks" who established primitive pretty good privacy key servers and built a web of trust over the past several years, the International Banking Conspiracy is attempting to set up a gargantuan web of certificate authorities to support individuals and corporations in the publication of their cryptographic identities. The unpatriotic stools of this conspiracy within our own US government are expected to legitimize this unholy plan by permitting the wholesale export of SET-related products under the guise that SET is purely a financial transaction processing system. However, over time it will become clear that this was the beginning of the end. The SET co-conspirators have made it abundantly clear in their specification that the financial security and viability of their entire initiative relies on the absolute privacy of each individual's personal keys. This explicit rejection of the sharing of keys effectively rules out key escrow schemes for SET. After an unprecedented global training excercise, in which the Banking Conspiracy will inculcate the imperative that private keys must NEVER be shared with anyone (or else your credit cards will be cancelled or your merchant status revoked), and after worldwide rollout of products intended to allow secret communications over any network connection including the backbone internet, the public telephone system, radio channels, through corporate and national firewalls, and even by "carrier pigeon" the "consortium" will exend the SET protocol to allow the sending of so-called EDI messages (communications which can be effectively on any topic between any two parties) over the established global secret network. An age of secure private communications will be ushered in. And then...separate SET-protocol webs will be established where the "CAs", "merchants" and "cardholders" are simply pseudonyms for...revolutionary forces intent on trafficing in guns, laundering money and replacing world governments with child pornographers, drugs lords and terrorists. Seemingly innocent browser software installed everywhere will become the tool of evildoers to invisibly conduct their own global conspiracies. Only then, too late, will the Banking Conspiracy realize that they no longer control the planet and that in true Hegelian fashion their great idea contained the seeds of its own destruction. Don't say I didn't warn you! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQCVAgUBM7xnY0Ce79c5xtT7AQHyGgP+OyOzslpIbd98Nx5NyiGmoMpE3DjdZhtT T+MOAx6CLVEd8Bm5xJKEN2v/fZ1QrZeNfOxl1pA5rxXV5bzAFs16nTKIvxFU6iI3 vP2/x7BIW0P75SuCqftCnOotISaN02gvO3Xn+1L3LEJepQ6Aj9C2DoSKE1uzjEy8 WKdfqrG3r5g= =zdfI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------- The e$ lists are brought to you by: Intertrader Ltd: "Digital Money Online" <http://www.intertrader.com/library/DigitalMoneyOnline> Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk Like e$? Help pay for it! <http://www.shipwright.com/beg.html> For e$/e$pam sponsorship, mail Bob: <mailto:rah@shipwright.com> Thanks to the e$ e$lves: Of Counsel: Vinnie Moscaritolo <mailto:vinnie@webstuff.apple.com> (Majordomo)^2: Rachel Willmer<mailto:rachel@intertrader.com> Commermeister: Anthony Templer <mailto:anthony@atanda.com> Interturge: Rodney Thayer <mailto:rodney@sabletech.com> --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/

1 0

e$: $MTP?
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Sender: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com Reply-To: Robert Hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 09:21:12 -0400 From: Robert Hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com> To: Multiple recipients of <e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com> Subject: e$: $MTP? They've been talking on cypherpunks about various ideas for authenticating the sender of mail, and it brings up something I've been increasing my agit-prop efforts on lately. Unfortunately, the ultimate way for any e-mail authentication scheme to work is for the *whole* message to be signed, headers and all, and then for the sending SMTP server to sign the message passes it on, headers and all, and so forth. The consequences of this approach, in terms of machine resources, not to mention privacy (plus or minus how close you can get to perfect pseudonymity), will probably be excessive. The solution, here, I think, is economic, since this is, at root, an economic problem. It's also one we've talked about here at length on e$. That solution is postage. If you use some kind of hash-collision microcoin protocol like Rivest/Shamir's MicroMint, or the "hash-cash" stuff people have been talking about on cypherpunks, you end up with a completely off-line, extremely small value digital cash system which could be used to pay for stuff like e-mail postage. The only thing you need to do is to encrypt the payment to the $MTP (:-)) machine, which then sends your mail. The only overhead is in handling the money, and, since it's handled offline anyway, the overhead is going to be much less than authenticating signatures either with an internal table, or, worse, in an on-line scheme of some kind. However you do the protocol, you probably want to run it on a sender-pays basis, as that's where all the economic incentive to spam comes from. Actually, now that I think about it, a truly sender-pays system would mean that receiver-collects, and so the *receiving* $MTP machine would be the one which should actually get the money. This is not too far from the idea of getting paid to read mail, which has also been discussed on cypherpunks before. The receiving $MTP machine could even raise or lower its postage price depending on the load at the time, thus auctioning its processing resources to the highest bidder. People like e-mail spammers, needing to send messages to you very cheaply would have to wait until the price comes down. Some of them could wait a very long time. :-). Frankly, I see no other solution to this problem in the long run except for postage, which means it's probably time to start figuring out, in earnest, how to make it all work. Whoever becomes the lowest cost producer of this kind of software stands to make a whole *bunch* of money. Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ ---------- The e$ lists are brought to you by: Intertrader Ltd: "Digital Money Online" <http://www.intertrader.com/library/DigitalMoneyOnline> Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk Like e$? Help pay for it! <http://www.shipwright.com/beg.html> For e$/e$pam sponsorship, mail Bob: <mailto:rah@shipwright.com> Thanks to the e$ e$lves: Of Counsel: Vinnie Moscaritolo <mailto:vinnie@webstuff.apple.com> (Majordomo)^2: Rachel Willmer<mailto:rachel@intertrader.com> Commermeister: Anthony Templer <mailto:anthony@atanda.com> Interturge: Rodney Thayer <mailto:rodney@sabletech.com> --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/

1 0

index.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CNN logo US navbar Infoseek/Big Yellow Pathfinder/Warner Bros Main banner If it's in your head, Okidata puts it on paper. rule GOP: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WOULD 'SHOCK' FOUNDING FATHERS July 5, 1997 Web posted at: 3:46 p.m. EDT (1946 GMT) Solomon graphic WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The federal government is just too big, taking on things "that would have shocked" the nation's founding fathers, New York Congressman Gerald Solomon said Saturday in the Republican weekly radio address. "The Founding Fathers designed a government with limited and defined powers," Solomon said. "But that idea has been turned on its head." Chief among the government offenses, the congressman said, is an exorbitant tax bill. "What the founding fathers could not even comprehend is the idea of Americans paying more in takes than they do for food and shelter," Solomon said. "Our Republican philosophy is different," he said. "We'd rather shrink the welfare class and put the American dream of financial security and independence within the reach of as many middle class people as possible." The recently passed budget, Solomon said, will accomplish that by offering tax relief to families with children, and those with "oppressive capital gains taxes." "We're not talking millionaires here," he said. "We're talking about people like grandparents who owned a house for years, reared their children in that house and then decades later they want to sell it when it becomes too much of burden." The GOP Tax Relief Act, Solomon said, "will help 2 million older Americans." Other aspects of the tax relief plan will help small business owners -- who may want to pass on the family business to sons and daughters -- by increasing an exemption on estate taxes. Solomon compared the current Republican tax cut to the birth of the United States 221 years ago. "Yes, on July 4, 1776, we won the battle of independence from oppressive taxation and today ... the Republican Congress has just won another battle to restore a larger chunk of that freedom from taxation to you," he said. rule Transcript: * Transcript of Republican weekly radio address - July 5, 1997 Related site: Note: Page will open in a new browser window * House RepublicanLeadership External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive. Search for related CNN stories: ________________________________________ ______ [Help] Tip: You can restrict your search to the title of a document. Infoseek grfk Example: title:New Year's Resolutions rule Message Boards Sound off on our message boards Tell us what you think! You said it... [INLINE] If it's in your head, Okidata puts it on paper. rule To the top © 1997 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you.

1 0