December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

vehicle plate owner registration
by BagbyHtSpg＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi- whether the law has changed or not, what is the status of getting lists of oregon license plate owner's perhaps from previous sources? If this is either very illegal, or no longer possible please let me know thank you.

1 0

none
by nobody＠nsm.htp.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

BagbyHtSpg(a)aol.com wrote: > > Hi- whether the law has changed or not, what is the status of getting lists of > oregon license plate owner's perhaps from previous sources? If this is either > very illegal, or no longer possible please let me know thank you. Sure, no problem. Just send fifty bucks per plate, money orders only (do not fill in the "pay to the order of" part) to me, Sammy, at: Oregon State Penitentiary 2004 Coastal Hwy. Portland, Oregon 89002 Attn: Sammy Polinski A 44E52J (Block 9) That's $50.00 per address/plate, no questions asked. Nice doin business withdya. Sammy

1 0

Spamming
by Art1Carol 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I do not spam! I don't think....The Government Lets it's post office's around the country spam everyone every day, for the postage Don't we wish we had a delete button for that? As a matter of fact when Uncle Bill and the henchmen in Washington can figure out how to make a profit off of email, "and they will" there won't be any spamming laws because uncle Tax will be making a windfall of money. I do believe each provider should have a block for unsolicited email and instruct their customers how to use it, and if they don't, Spam Away... The people who cry about spamming, don't know what they are going to create, wait til they send thier loved ones an email and get charged for it, then they'll wish they would have shut up and used the delete button....Thanks Art smith

1 0

No Subject
by nulo66＠interaktiv.design.no 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

They're Young ! They're Fresh ! They're Beautiful ! They're L I V E !!! And They are yours FREE for 1 week. Stop by and take a look: http://207.212.128.4/newteenpics/xxxteen/enter.html

1 0

Re: infant SSN assignment (whoops)
by Richard Storey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I remember discussing the changes with a friend around 1991. At the time I was reading the changes noted to the law in IRS publication no. 17. I believe it is also noted on Form 1040 (look in the area used for children's SSN, it should be ref. in the instructions). Between the two of these, you should get a pointer to the code, and all of these are available online. The IRS is the only agency, that I have know, of using this law and, again, I think that congress made it law c. '91. Richard Storey Mark Hedges wrote: > > Could someone kindly point toward an authoritative resource which proves > assignment of SSN's to newborns is mandatory? Gratzi. -hedges-

1 0

My hubby smears curry on my breasts/17in willy too heavy to carry
by STUFFED/EUREKA! 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL below. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the line, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). http://stuffed.net/98/7/29/ If you have an email program that can display web pages you will find today's front cover should have already been disp- layed and can be clicked on to take you straight to Stuffed. This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka!

1 0

Free NNTP server question...
by Kurt Wolter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi cypherpunks, I grabbed your email address of an html posting of this newsgroup - in other words, your my randomly selected answer person(s). My question: My isp doesn't have an NNTP Server, but I'm under the impression that I can use a "free" news server somehow. I need to be pointed in the direction of how to set up news with a server other than my isp. Thanks, serpent(a)rths.rochelle.net

1 0

present president
by Richard Storey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Gillogly wrote: > > However, SSN abuse seems like pretty thin [ice?] grounds, and not specifically attributable to the current President. > Jim Gillogly Yes, perjury, conspiracy, and other possible felonies seem to be much more in evidence--for now. Richard Storey

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - July 29, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

========================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. A new multi-billion dollar industry is here! Be at CTIA's WIRELESS I.T. '98 where personal computing and communications converge! Don't Miss Your Chance -- October 12-14, 1998 Bally's Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV For more information, visit http://www.wirelessit.com ===========================================

1 0

NSA Losing Crypto Experts
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From Government Executive, August, 1998: The National Security Agency is losing ground in the fight to keep hard-to-find cryptography experts from being lured to greener pastures. By Richard Lardner Price Waterhouse didn't become a force in the consulting world by ignoring market trends. So it was no surprise when the firm decided to expand its information security operation. After all, the Internet has completely changed the way business is done: Paper is out, electrons are in. But just as electronic commerce is skyrocketing, so too are the odds that sensitive corporate information might be tampered with as it travels through cyberspace. With the private sector beginning to recognize that the digital door swings both ways, there's growing demand for the "risk management" services Price Waterhouse and other companies are offering to help keep the hackers at bay. To snare these potential clients, the company needed to hire hundreds of information technology professionals. Trouble is, information protection may be a huge growth area, but the talent pool is mighty shallow. So officials at Price Waterhouse did what many other commercial enterprises have done, and continue to do. They targeted a group of employees at the Defense Department's secretive National Security Agency, where thousands of the federal government's best and brightest spend their days eavesdropping on other countries while at the same time ensuring that U.S. information networks are secure. Because of the highly sensitive missions the agency performs, companies like Price Waterhouse know they are getting employees who are extremely good at what they do and are solid citizens too-NSA is picky about whom it hires and conducts thorough background investigations. Full text: http://www.jya.com/nsa-loss.htm

1 0