December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?
by Nobuki Nakatuji 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> >In article <19980105070034.3946.qmail(a)hotmail.com> you write: >> Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? Where isn't safe if it is here because it >> isn't safe? > >FEAL is dead; I wouldn't ever use it in any new product. >Use triple-DES instead. > What kind of method was FEAL decoded in? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

2 1

Re: cypherpunks and guns
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Ryan Lackey <rdl(a)mit.edu> # AOLserver (a nice web server formerly from GNN/navisoft) punted their # 128bit SSL module distribution *EVEN TO US CITIZENS* due to commerce # department fuckedness. Anyone know where I could get a copy? It would # really suck to have to patch the 40bit one into a 128bit version, since # they do not distribute source. I don't know if this is the "module" form of the answer you want: http://www.replay.com/ Download Netscape Communicator 4.04 with 128 bits SSL today on: ftp.replay.com Replay Associates distributes this software so you can safely conduct your E-commerce ---- Tim May wrote: > Final comment: If I find the motivation, I may finish an essay I've been > working on about how we, the Cypherpunks and the World, are *retrogressing* > in crypto areas. Most of the exotic applications are no longer being > discussed, and various mundane commercial products are the main focus. > Yawn. How about moving this list to encrypt its transmissions in the recipient's public keys, just to begin encrypting Net traffic? Obviously not to hide what is being said, but simply to start moving communications into the encrypted realm. That way, we'll build up the software tools for handling this, and try to get other lists to do the same. Maybe encourage all pro-crypto people to use it for all email to as many other people they talk with as possible. (Adopt two others...) Heh: a white-list to allow only encrypted messages through. Encourage Senators to set up public keys. In general, try to get the general flow of traffic encrypted, even if PGP is "mundane" these days. Solving the human factors problem of getting its use wide-spread is _not_ a mundane problem. Encryption ain't gonna be that useful if only a few in-the-know use it. ---guy

2 1

RE: Location Escrow anyone ?
by Pearson Shane 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hey guys, I wasn't suggesting that they do record exactly where everyone is at the highest resolution possible. Just suggesting that should they want to investigate an individual, they could do it with pretty high detail. Though I'm sure they'd record when and where you switch your phone on, switch off / loose signal, switch cells and make and receive calls and messages. That wouldn't be all that much data. Bye for now.

1 0

Re: cypherpunks and guns
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > Final comment: If I find the motivation, I may finish an essay I've been > > working on about how we, the Cypherpunks and the World, are *retrogressing* > > in crypto areas. Most of the exotic applications are no longer being > > discussed, and various mundane commercial products are the main focus. Yawn. > > You mean things like Onion Routers, Crowds & the like? Tim May doesn't know anything about Onion Routers, Crowds, or any of the other new privacy technologies like Adam Back's prototype Eternity service. In truth, he has lost all interest in cryptography and now spends his time talking about guns and making racist comments. He wonders why the cypherpunks list no longer attracts quality cryptographic ideas. He need look no farther than the nearest mirror. His violent rants and his off-topic, offensive posts have done more than anything to drive good people off the list. The single best thing that could happen to the cypherpunks list (and the cypherpunks movement, for that matter) would be for Tim May to leave the list and disassociate himself from the cypherpunks. He would be much more comfortable joining the KKK and the local militia. After him, Paul Bradley, William Geiger and Dimitri Vulis can follow. This will leave fine thinkers with good hearts like Adam Back, Bill Stewart, Wei Dai and others, people who still believe that cryptography can make a strong contribution to our freedom.

2 1

RE: [Humor] Kennedy's New Legislation
by Kurt Buff 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It balances, or more accurately, they don't. A second politician died today on the ski slope - Sonny Bono. - -----Original Message----- From: Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM [SMTP:dlv@bwalk.dm.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 1998 4:19 PM To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Subject: Re: [Humor] Kennedy's New Legislation Declan McCullagh <declan(a)well.com> writes: > We have a good story in this week's Time that talks about how the ski > resort had repeatedly asked the Kennedys to knock it off. Including the > night before the accident. Even on the "fateful" afternoon, the ski patrol > had told the Kennedys -- the last on the slopes -- it was time to quit. > "Nevertheless, 36 members of the Kennedy party prepared to play." "Evolution in action." Thank you, Michael Kennedy, for improving humanity's gene pool. - --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNLMtJw3xegzLXcRmEQKeCwCgsElXKkUb2dzM+N0d2nn8I7fresoAn2yF fsizimZ5xfume+xLbPvpQCWL =ZhY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RE: best body armor for cypherpunks [serious]
by Kurt Buff 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nice shot! :) However, Second Chance is probably the leader of that particular pack. - -----Original Message----- From: Trei, Peter [SMTP:ptrei@securitydynamics.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 1998 8:32 AM To: 'cypherpunks(a)toad.com' Subject: RE: best body armor for cypherpunks [serious] > ---------- > From: Mix[SMTP:mixmaster@remail.obscura.com] > Reply To: Mix > Sent: Sunday, January 04, 1998 10:44 PM > To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Subject: best body armor for cypherpunks [serious] > > What is, in your opinion, the best (price and performance-wise) > body armor for cypherpunks? > After a few years on this list, one develops such a thick skin that extra protection is superfluos Peter Trei ptrei(a)securitydynamics.c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNLMsmw3xegzLXcRmEQKJ4gCg9Fr8/XXJFUsB9UaPaZ4zymdc5GoAn3YS u46oyeNLel8/+nYbBs7Xb49R =EqQY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Personalized Mouse Pads
by pads＠mouse.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Have you ever wondered why your mother gave you the name she did? Were you named after a close relative, family friend or possibly a television celebrity? Well, we can't tell you why either! However, what we can tell you is exactly what your name means! We print your name and it's meaning on an attractive mouse pad with a custom art background of vibrant colors and scenery. Not only is it pleasant to look at, but everytime you sit down to your computer, you'll be reminded of just how great you are. We have the largest most comprehensive database of names anywhere. And we can print names in both Spanish and English. We are so sure you'll be pleased with your personalized mouse pad, that we offer a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee. Placing your order is easy too! Just complete the order form below and mail it along with just $10 plus shipping and handling. (see below), and we will rush your personalized mouse pad by first class mail. Choose your background preference!! ABC BLOCKS ANGELS CLOUDS DOLPHINS PRAYING HANDS SPORTS TEDDY BEAR UNICORN or WATERFALL EASY ORDER FORM NAME REQUESTED MALE/FEMALE BACKGROUND PREF. _________________ ____________ ________________________ _________________ ____________ ________________________ _________________ ____________ ________________________ QUANITY ORDERED_______________ AMOUNT SENT$_______________ CASH CHECK OR MONEY ORDER'S ONLY!!!! US FUNDS ONLY!!!!!!! USA MAILORDERS $12 EA ALL OTHER ORDERS $14 EA (includes $2 shipping/handling charge) (includes $4 shipping/handling charge) MOST ORDERS SHIPPED WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF PAYING BY CHECK, YOUR ORDER WILL BE SENT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING BANK APPROVAL. PLEASE MAIL YOUR ORDER TO: 3J PRODUCTS PO BOX 7183 OXNARD CA 93031

1 0

Ruby Ridge FBI sniper to stand trial [CNN]
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > FBI SNIPER TO STAND TRIAL IN RUBY RIDGE CASE > > FBI seal January 7, 1998 > Web posted at: 6:32 p.m. EST (2332 GMT) > > BONNERS FERRY, Idaho (AP) -- A judge Wednesday ordered an FBI > sharpshooter to stand trial on a state manslaughter charge for the > death of white separatist Randy Weaver's wife in the 1992 siege at > Ruby Ridge. > > The U.S. Justice Department decided in 1994 against prosecuting Lon > Horiuchi and upheld the decision last year after a long review. But > in August, Boundary County Prosecutor Denise Woodbury filed a charge > of involuntary manslaughter. > > Magistrate Judge Quentin Harden decided there was probable cause to > bring Horiuchi to trial on the state charge. Harden scheduled a > February 13 arraignment before state Judge James Michaud. > > A federal judge is to hear arguments Monday from Horiuchi's lawyers > in Boise that the case should be transferred to federal court. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Sentencing for Electronic Copyright Infringement
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The United States Sentencing Commission published in the Federal Register today an RFC on changes in sentencing guidelines. Here's an excerpt on electronic copyright infringement: . . . Legislative Amendments Electronic Copyright Infringement 9. Issue for Comment The No Electronic Theft Act, Public Law 105-147, was recently enacted to provide a statutory basis to prosecute and punish persons who, without authorization and without realizing financial gain or commercial advantage, electronically access copyrighted materials or encourage others to do so. The Act includes a directive to the Commission to (A) ensure that the applicable guideline range for a crime committed against intellectual property (including offenses set forth at section 506(a) of title 17, United States Code, and sections 2319, 2319A, and 2320 of title 18, United States Code) is sufficiently stringent to deter such a crime; and (B) ensure that the guidelines provide for consideration of the retail value and quantity of the items with respect to which the crime against intellectual property was committed. Each of the statutes mentioned in the congressional directive currently are referenced to Sec. 2B5.3 (Criminal Infringement of Copyright or Trademark). That guideline provides for incrementally greater punishment when the retail value of the infringing items exceeded $2,000. However, when copyrighted materials are infringed upon by electronic means, there is no ``infringing item'', as would be the case with counterfeited goods. Therefore, the Commission must determine how to value the infringed upon items in order to implement the congressional directive to take into account the retail value and quantity of the items with respect to which the offense was committed. The Commission invites comment on how Sec. 2B5.3 (Criminal Infringement of Copyright or Trademark) should be amended to best effectuate the congressional directives. An approach suggested by the Department of Justice is set forth below. The Commission invites comment on this and alternative proposals. Department of Justice Proposed Amendments to Sec. 2B5.3: The text of Sec. 2B5.3 is amended to read as follows: ``(a) Base offense level: [6] (b) Specific Offense Characteristic (1) If the loss to the copyright or trademark exceeded $2,000, increase by the corresponding number of levels from the table in Sec. 2F1.1 (Fraud and Deceit).''. The Commentary to Sec. 2B5.3 captioned ``Application Note'' is amended in Note 1 by striking: `` `Infringing items' means the items that violate the copyright or trademark laws (not the legitimate items that are infringed upon).'', and inserting: ``A court may calculate the `loss to the copyright or trademark owner' in any reasonable manner. In determining `loss to the copyright or trademark owner,' the court may consider lost profits, the value of the infringed upon items, the value of the infringing items, the injury to the copyright or trademark owner's reputation, and other associated harms.''. The Commentary to Sec. 2B5.3 captioned ``Application Note'' is amended by striking ``Note'' and inserting ``Notes''; and by adding at the end the following new note: ``2. In some cases, the calculable loss to the victim understates the true harm caused by the offense. For example, a defendant may post copyrighted material to an electronic bulletin board or similar online facility, making it easy for others to illegally obtain and further distribute the material. In such an instance, it may not be possible to determine or even estimate how many copies were downloaded, or how much damage the defendant's conduct ultimately caused. In such cases, an upward departure may be warranted. See Chapter Five, Part K (Departures).''. The Commentary to Sec. 2B5.3 captioned ``Background'' is amended in the first paragraph by striking ``value of the infringing items'' and inserting ``loss to the copyright or trademark owner''; and by striking ``loss or''. [End excerpt] For the full RFC: http://jya.com/ussc010698.txt (254K)

4 3

1998 - the year we must make a stand.
by Global Web Builders 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: No unsolicited email is sent. If you do not want to be on the mailing list please say "REMOVE" in the subject line and return the message in the body of this email (so that we can track your state). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear One Nation Supporter in New South Wales, As Australia moves towards the year 2000 we Australians move into a critical stage of our history. A stage which is the culmination of years of deception by the Labor and Coalition parties leading to the undermining of our democracy. With a Federal Election in the wind 1998 provides a chance for Australians to rectify the wrongs of the past. Voting for the major parties will provide no solutions - only more of the same. However, expect the major parties to claim that voting for Pauline Hanson's One Nation will be a wasted vote. They are wrong - tell your friends and make a stand for your children's future by voting for Pauline Hanson's One Nation. I am going to cite just one example of many on how you, as an Australian voter, are being misled by the mainstream political parties. In a word the subject is 'MAI' an international agreement to which Australia will be a signatory. MAI is being debated more and more on the Internet through the World Wide Web. Here are some web site links on the subject. Please take the time to visit these sites because they demonstrate how the transnational companies, through MAI (the multilateral agreement on investment), are bargaining away your future with senior Canberra-based bureaucrats. 1) ABC interview - full transcript: http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/onenation/press/maiabc.html Extract: 'Sadly there's no catch title for this trade deal. It's called the Multilateral Agreement on Investment, or MAI. But what it promises holds more drama. It aims to grant multinational corporations unprecedented powers over governments. And it's not getting many good reviews.' and 'In effect, the MAI is a bill of rights for international giants like Shell, Lockheed, Du Pont, and Arthur Andersen. It prevents governments asking more of those multinationals than they ask of their own domestic companies. And any laws that discriminate in favour of locals, such as Australian media ownership laws, don't fit.' 2) MAI Information Centre (Canada): http://www.islandnet.com/~ncfs/maisite/homepage.htm Extract: 'It incorporates a powerful dispute resolution system which would allow any investor to sue the government of its host nation if it considers laws or regulations to be discriminatory and detrimental to immediate or projected profits. The Agreement would therefore disable regional development and national measures to protect the well-being of people, create employment, safeguard small business, conserve resources and protect the environment. Once signed, the MAI cannot be denounced for five years. Investments under the MAI would remain protected for a further fifteen years.' The MAI debate is being discussed openly in Canada and New Zealand while in Australia we are being closeted from this debate by the duopoly which runs this country's media. It is a very real issue. An issue that the major parties refuse to bring out into the open. An issue, amongst many, many others that Pauline Hanson's One Nation is trying to expose. BUT we cannot do that without your support. Your vote and those of your friends will be critical to ensure that issues such as MAI are heard, are questioned, can be rejected by you and I - the Australian people. Clearly the major political parties have failed in drawing issues like this out into the public arena for discussion. Pauline Hanson PS. If you are able to help with donations to help us fund our candidates in state and federal elections this year please visit: http://www.gwb.com.au/pledge.html

1 0