December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

porno is good for kids
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Pornography is good for children! It helps them acknowledge the reality of sexual identity in the world of human beings. Most of the people I knew even into high school had sex with their friends before they were ten. Lots and lots of people -- meaning a lot -- took lots and lots of LSD. The world was good because everyone was going someplace peaceful eventually and neopaganism's many useful features brought widespread happiness. We tracked down Playboys and Playgirls too and looked at them and wondered at the novelty of the experience. Tell children about the penis and the vagina and how they can make you shiver and convulse with pleasure when you rub them together! Tell them about the forgetfulness of being which comes with orgasm. Sex is a wonderful part of life. Don't ruin it for children with fear and associations of violence and evil. GEEK NAKED

1 0

TDC: Sci-Tek ...
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, Check out Sci-Tek on The Discovery Channel. The current episode is really pretty full of grins and giggles, not to mention a lot of half-truths and plain techno-fantasy. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

Advertise On the Internet For Free
by benoi＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Business Owners and Marketing Managers: I am writing to invite you to have a free listing for your business in the new National Direct Internet Yellow Pages. Even if you already have your business listed or advertise somewhere else, you will want to take advantage of this opportunity to extend your marketing and reach more of your local customers and prospects. Over 5.5 million hits were received on the National Direct site last month alone. Today many of your local prospects are going online to browse--and buy, and to reach as many potential customers as National Direct you would have to advertise in over 6500 yellow page books. Here's how the system works: When someone wants your type of service, they simply go online to http://www.ndiyp.com Then they type in the area code for the location they want. Finally, they type in what they are looking for. As long as you are listed, your business will come up on their screen. Larger ads get more attention, of course, and cost little. But your basic listing in the National Direct Internet Yellow Pages is yours free. To claim your listing. simply fill out the form and return it via e-mail to us asap. We'll see your business gets listed right away. Our e-mail address is toppy15(a)hotmail.com If you have any questions, please feel free to call (405) 942-5811 Monday - Friday 8-5. Please Complete Entire Form: Your Name: Your Title: Company Name: Company Address: City/State/Zip: Telephone Number: Fax Number: Type of Business: e-mail address: Web site address: Would you like information on larger classified or display ads? Return to<A HREF="mailto:toppy15@hotmail.com">CLICK HERE

1 0

Season's Greetings from HOLLYWOOD...................................
by ccxt＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Let Your Creative Efforts for '97 Compound into Prosperity for '98 An Award Winning Team of Hollywood Producers and Directors is pleased to Invite the Submission of Your Entries in Computer Animation, Photography and Illustration for the World (WWW) Premiere of the 1997 Annual International "CAPI" Awards Be included in the "CAPI" Awards First CD-ROM "Library of Excellence" Distributed to Top Motion Picture Studios...Television Networks... and Advertising Agencies in Hollywood and around the World! PARTICIPATE in the World Wide Web's first competition organized by Top Hollywood Producers dedicated to discovering and honoring the very best new talent in the world...directly throughout the Internet! ENTRIES ARE JUDGED by an International Award-Winning Team of Industry Professionals currently participating in some of Hollywood's most prestigious Entertainment and Communications Productions! AWARDS ARE PRESENTED for the excellence and merit of each individual entry. ENTRANTS DO NOT COMPETE AGAINST EACH OTHER! There are equal opportunities for multiple GOLD, SILVER, and BRONZE "CAPI" Awards to be presented in all categories, to numerous qualifying entrants! RECEIVE INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION and publicity that can assist you in creating new marketing and promotional opportunities for your career...potentially having your work Licensed by Leading Producers in the Hollywood & International Entertainment and Communications Industries! For more information visit us at: http://www.capiawards.com/ Copyright 1997 "CAPI" Awards "CAPI" AWARDS, PUBLIC RELATIONS 11247 Acama Ave., Studio City, CA, USA 91602 Our research indicates the preceeding information is of interest to you. If you prefer not to be on this private mailing list, please let us know and you will be promptly removed. Email:<A HREF="mailto:CAPIMAIL@AOL.COM> with Subject: REMOVE

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I tried sending an anonymous test article to comp.org.cauce via the CRACKER remailer. Sure enough, the Gypsie Jew Zorch forged a cancel for my article: >From: scott(a)zorch.sf-bay.org (Scott Hazen Mueller) >Newsgroups: comp.org.cauce >Subject: cancelled posting >Date: 30 Dec 1997 13:25:04 -0500 >Organization: At Home; Salida, CA >Lines: 26 >Sender: johnl(a)iecc.com >Approved: comp.org.cauce(a)abuse.net >Message-ID: <EM0LFH.Bn3(a)zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> >Reply-To: scott(a)zorch.sf-bay.org >NNTP-Posting-Host: ivan.iecc.com >X-submission-address: comp-org-cauce(a)abuse.net >X-Authentication-Warning: orbit.hooked.net: Uzorch set sender to news(a)zorch.sf-bay.org using -f >X-Nntp-Posting-Host: localhost.sf-bay.org >Path: ...!iecc.com!iecc.com!not-for-mail > >I have issued a cancel for the following posting to comp.org.cauce. Death >threats are serious business. > >Xref: zorch comp.org.cauce:378 >Path: zorch!news.well.com!noos.hooked.net!204.156.128.20.MISMATCH!news1.best.com >!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-sea-19.sprintlink.net!news-i >n-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!205.238.207.65!iecc.com!iecc.co >m!not-for-mail >From: Anonymous <anon(a)anon.efga.org> >Newsgroups: comp.org.cauce >Subject: CAUCE offers a $50,000 (canadian) reward for killing Chris Lewis, his w >ife, and the kid >Date: 30 Dec 1997 10:58:17 -0500 >Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY >Lines: 14 >Sender: johnl(a)iecc.com >Approved: comp.org.cauce(a)abuse.net >Message-ID: <b8d6450efb8581fa6190e92216c92e16(a)anon.efga.org> >NNTP-Posting-Host: ivan.iecc.com >X-submission-address: comp-org-cauce(a)abuse.net >Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. > It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. > Please report problems or inappropriate use to the > remailer administrator at <admin(a)anon.efga.org>. My cancelled Usenet article offered a reward for killing the spammer: >CAUCE, the enforcement branch of the Internet administration, is dedicated to >exterminating all SPAMMERS by any means necessary. CAUCE wants Chris Lewis and >all other SPAMMERS dead, and will gladly pay the $50,000 (canadian) reward to >whomever KILLS Chris Lewis and his family, who reside in a suburb of Ottawa: > >483 Vances Side Road >Dunrobin, Ontario K0A 1T0 >CANADA >Home telephone: (613) 832-0541, >Office telephone: (613) 763-2935 > >After you kill Chris Lewis and his family, please see http://www.cauce.org >for information on how to collect your CAUCE reward. This is fucking censorship! I'm putting the notice of the CAUCE reward on my web home page at http://www.panix.com/~guy, right next to the pictures of the pre-teen kids screwing. Fuck you, Zorch, you're next after C, P, and G Lewis. ---guy

6 5

Re: Word Processors and GUIs (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 97 03:40:31 -0600 > Subject: Re: Word Processors and GUIs > While some standardization is good it is not the be all to end all. While > standardization of cut, paste, open, close, print makes perfect sense most > commands do not fall into this catagory. Perhaps not, but 90% of what people *do* does fall into those operations. Ever hear of macro's? Ever use a Sun where the menu pull-down pops up under the pointer when you click a button? Both of these will increase the use of a GUI to way more than a straight CLI interface (and I type at nearly 80 words a minute with a slightly crippled L. hand). I suggest you get a GUI macro utility and something like PopUpMenu on the Amiga that makes the menu's appear both at the command bar *and* under the mouse. Using this technique I can execute a file save via GUI in about 1/3 the time I can in the CLI. > The inherent benefit of this > standardization decrease the more specialized an application becomes. With > a program like Autocad or MathCad or even Lotus 1-2-3 where one has a > steep learning curve of specialized commands the benefits of standardized > basic commands boarders on insignificant. You are confusing learning the commands with learning the 'model' that the program impliments. The learning curve comes from the user learning the model the programmer(s) had in their head(s) while writing the program and learning to solve problems with the black box functions the programmer/developer uses to solve those problems. > Once we get past the standardization issue to the one of textmode vs GUI > (which was the topic of my original post) I doubt that one can make the > case that a draftsman running a graphics program under a textmode OS is > less efficient as his counterpart who is saddled with a bloated GUI OS. In I use both POVRay as well as LightWave, one text and one GUI. The GUI program is *much* easier to develop 3d renderings in because things like boundary violations, control path anomolies, and such are *much* easier to see and deal with in the GUI interface. I also use Scientific Notebook, I can't imagine doing the same sort of things I do with that GUI text-processor with say a textual Postscript or Tex program. Just try making a nice nifty graphical output using Postscript (say) using a GUI and a editor working in Postscript directly. > fact if both are operating on the same hardware I would venture a guess > that the textmode user will be more efficient by the simple fact that his > resources are not being consumed by the GUI. This assumption is *very* dependant upon the model of the software. It depends upon whether the process takes the command sequence and executes it in parallel or in series with the command entry sequence. In other words, if the program renders while you are entering new commands will obviously be much slower than a program that takes the sequence of commands in toto and *then* executes them. The efficiency to a large part depends upon the model of the software, not the particular command and control interface. If you expect to execute processes in parallel (ie edit & execute in parallel) then a GUI is much quicker (not taking into account the added overhead of the GUI, which in and of itself is not a condemnation of the GUI but rather the poor processors we have to run them on) because you can see you errors as they occur and it keeps them from propogating through the design or use process. If sequential is your goal then it really doesn't matter because in both cases (ie GUI v CLI) becuase while it's executing your commands you can't do anything anyway. Of course, these models *only* apply if we are single-tasking programs. If we allow multi-tasking then GUI wins hands down because graphical information content is *much* higher than CLI in every case. This allows us to display more information on a GUI than a CLI. Personaly, this is a non-argument from the technical perspective. It is more indicative of the mental flexibility of the holders of the various positions. I wouldn't use an OS that wouldn't let me do both at the same time (and I don't) and use them as I need them. > The same case can be made for the accounting staff using spreadsheets or > the secretaries typing letters. I'll take an accounting department using > Lotus 1-2-3 3.x up against a similar group running MS Office and Win95/NT > any day of the week. I'll get the same work done faster and *cheaper*. Excuse me but the user interface of your example, 123, *has* GUI elements even in a text mode display. > This brings up another issue of decreased performance with the GUI's. It > is the notion that every document must be type-set. I can't even start to > imagine the millions of man hours wasted in the office because every > insignificant memo, report, and letter has to be formatted "just right" This is a condemnation of human nature, not GUI's. I use a plain old text editor when I'm making simple edits. A perfect example is from work where we recently have taken on a group of office 'helpers' to take care of the more mundane office needs. They discovered they could add graphics and attachments to their email and ever since we have suffered from the abuse, emails with a dozen attachments of pretty pictures that I have to specificaly work through. Considering I get somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 emails a day that can be a real time sink (thank god for procmail!). But whattcha gonna do, shoot 'em? > Another contention I have with the GUI's is the use of icons. One of the > most misused and time wasting "features" of the GUI's. It makes absolutely > no sense for someone who is working on the keyboard to stop what they are > doing, go over to the mouse, and then point and click to execute a > command. Then quit using the mouse on the wrong damn side of the keyboard. If you're right handed the mouse goes on the left, not the right. That way you don't have to quit typing to deal with the GUI. It takes a couple of days to over come the 'handedness' that is built into our brain, but the long term benefit is that your wrist load goes *way* down on the right *and* your left hand fine motor control improves significantly. If you happen to be left handed then you need a reversed keyboard with the return key and such on the L. and the mouse on the right. Try it for 3 days - you'll like it. > Well I guess I will rap this up with a final note. With the GUI OS's (and > the applications that run on them) as size and complexity increases > performance and reliability decreases. Without a doubt I can get more work > done on cheaper hardware running *nix or os/2 using only text mode > applications than I can running a GUI with it's associated bloated > applications. That's interesting, I use Linux (x86 & PPC) , WinNT, AmigaDos, AIX, & Solaris at home on my personal machines (11 of them not counting the TI explorer, , Atari 800, SX-64 and C-128) and don't find a significant difference in reliability. They all stay up for weeks and weeks. OS/2 is a sucky os, it's unstable and calling it reliable is a joke. It's user interface is inconsistent, it's task swapper is weird and stalls at strange times for no apparent reason, etc., etc. Note that this is a personal opinion and not a function of my working for IBM and being required to use OS/2 everyday (I don't like that requirement either). It is a function of my using OS/2 since the 1.0 days. It's interesting to note that IBM is moving OS/2 from the general OS area to specialized applications... ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

You are all a bunch of cypherpunks (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 03:39:05 -0500 > From: David Miller <dm0(a)avana.net> > Subject: You are all a bunch of cypherpunks > 2) I want to know anyone who knows anything about full-duplex soundcard > programming under Linux. Internet Telephony is fast opon us, do you > want > to subscribe or design? This is duplex Nautilus II. Get in gear. O'Reilly has a new book out for Linux relating to writing device drivers. You also want a copy of their Linux multimedia book. I don't have the device driver book (it hasn't come in yet), but: Linux Multimedia Guide Jeff Tranter ISBN 1-56592-219-0 $32.95 You might also want to peruse: Beginning Linux Programming N. Matthew & R. Stones ISBN 1-874416-68-0 $36.95 Inside Linux Randolph Bentson ISBN 0-916151-89-1 (mine was $22.00, no price shown) Linux Programming P. Volkerding, E. Foster-Johnson, K. Reichard ISBN 1-55828-507-5 $39.95 Linux Kernel Internals M. Beck, H. Bohme, M. Dziadzka, U. Kunitz, R. Magnus, D. Verworner ISBN 0-201-87741-4 (mine was $40.75, no price shown, it's an import from Germany) Also: The Design of the Unix Operating System M.J. Bach ISBN 0-13-201799-7 (no price on book, this is the book Linus used to design the kernel) and finaly: Interprocess Communications in Unix: The nooks & crannies J.S. Gray ISBN 0-13-186891-8 (no price on book, $40?) Hope that helps. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Strange Way To Leak Inofrmation: Contents Of Discovery Channel Show On Non-Lethals (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: >From stugreen(a)bga.com Tue Dec 30 02:12:37 1997 Sender: root(a)coney.lsd-labs.com Message-ID: <34A8A83D.FBFEDD2F(a)bga.com> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 01:52:29 -0600 From: Stu Green <stugreen(a)bga.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ravage(a)ssz.com Subject: Strange Way To Leak Inofrmation: Contents Of Discovery Channel Show On Non-Lethals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim, I left the tube on Discovery while testing some software tonight. In the background I heard something about attacking computers so I started paying attention and to my warped mind the Fed was trying to leak some dis-information (or advertise some dirty tricks already pulled). In the hype there were some interesting things mentions that folks ought be aware of. They gave a 'man in the middle' scenario played out in full on the screen between a "computer security expert" and a group of transactions between a bank in acountry "plagued with drug production and cartels" and a bank in Switzerland. The third world bank and the Swiss bank were using PGP for encryption. The narrator dumped an aside - the government was supplying the "computer security expert" with "data gathered over time", which consisted of intercepts of the initial text messages passing the PGP keys back and forth (PGP 2.4 flashed on one of the screens, so we ain't talking about yesterday here). This amounts to an acknowledgement that one of the three-letter groups is playing man-in-the -middle already and on a grand scale (not that this is new news, but its nice having the speculation authenticated, even if in a manner that leaves the conclusion to the viewer's deductive processes). The last computer related portion involved the FBI planting trojan horses through anti-virus software. they flash a couple of screens - one was definately Norton Anit-virus for 95 and the other recognizible one was M$AV. I think the one I couldn't pin is Dr. Solomon's, but it could easily be McAfee. Doesn't matter - if one is popped, they all are. Back in June I built a K6 for David that had some real pecularities - the sound card went into outer space and set it's interupt to 14 and wouldn't let go. When I started to try to figure out what was going on I figured that something wrote to the bios, cause the symptoms were so werid. So I hacked a little thing up to go in and rewrite the bios'sNVRAM. It worked witht the motherboard's jumpers set to allow bios flashing and failed when the pins were set to block flashing. But when I use debug in a very dirty program I was able to jack with the wrteable ram, even with flashing diaabled, matter of fact it was so damned simple I wrote the motherboard manufacturer to show how it was broken. If ASUS is prone to this kind of dumb attack, then I figure other boards are probably more vulnerable and the government's got a pile of exploits to dick with any machine (running windows, MacOS or NT) with their trojan horses and bios-level attacks. I could have sworn that the stuff I saw on David's motherboard came strait from Bulgaria. It looked like one of the best hacks I ever saw - everytime I changed values in the bios and rebooted into 95, those values were reset to the original values right after post ran memory checking. But if I booted into Linux it did not effect anything (it's nice having all the system specific onformation in /proc, without having to write a program to extract it from kmem). So, from what I can conclude, there maybe reason to look over the shoulder a little more diligently cause somebody's out there fucking around. In that vain, I bagged some fool trying to start a mail flood from a system he broke into ( a customer of mine that knew he had been hacked). It kind of blew my mind, here this guy spent hours cracking around, found his way into the mail server (which was an NT machine) just to blast dumb & lame porno all over the place. (Happened to me in March - I left SATAN running at work over a weekend and as soon as I got on the windows box in my office a flood of shit started going out to the last person I mailed, which luckily was Jep, it was the samething lame porn and a ton of it, but I left my ass wide opened by leaving SATAN's fat neon sign on and not isolating the work station I was running SATAN on from my other machine, at least I isolated myself from the rest of Arrowsmith's network (which was the worst setup I've ever seen - but that's another story)). Hope Reef didn't get too traumatized by the Federales. Maybe you could sue the government for the stress induction as Reef's guardian?? Catch you soon and if not before - Happy New Years Regards, Stu

1 0

China clamps down on Internet [CNN]
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > CHINA CLAMPS NEW CONTROLS ON INTERNET > > Web posted at: 3:13 a.m. EST (0813 GMT) > > BEIJING (Reuters) -- China clamped sweeping new controls on the > Internet on Tuesday, warning that the network was being used to leak > state secrets and to spread "harmful information." > > Regulations unveiled by Zhu Entao, Assistant Minister for Public > Security, cover a wide range of crimes, including leaking state > secrets, political subversion and spreading pornography and > violence. > > The rules are also designed to protect against computer hacking, > viruses and other computer-related crime. > > They call for unspecified "criminal punishments" and fines of up to > 15,000 yuan ($1,800) for Internet providers and users who violate > the rules -- both individuals and business organisations. [text deleted] > The regulations explicitly cover information circulating from Hong > Kong, Macau and Taiwan. [text deleted]

1 0

The Anonymizer and IRC
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The Anonymizer does in fact only provide restricted access by http and NO IRC. For instance, the Anonymizer blocks Dejanews, Hotmail and mailto.cgi forms. I could understand that they block sites that explicitly request to be blocked to prevent abuse. But what if I want to make a mailto.cgi or IRC script available by http. Should people be disallowed from accessing this through The Anonymizer even if I do not request it? It should at least be possible to allow access to such scripts for The paid accounts. If they keep logs in case of a U. S. law violation, I see no problem of liability arosing from such access. They have also restricted their shell access for which you pay US $ 7 per moth to IRC. Does that sound more reasonable than blocking the nntp port? Does anyone know other ISPs who provide privacy and do not block abitrarily without _prior request_ from the site in question? A private interest can do anything, but anyway. * * *===================================================================* For subscription info see http://www.efga.org/about/maillist.html

2 3