December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

[FWD] Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape
by Steve Schear 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: 06 Nov 1997 07:58:03 -0800 (PST) From: Phil Agre <pagre(a)weber.ucsd.edu> Subject: Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape Feel free to post where appropriate. Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape edited by Philip E. Agre University of California, San Diego Marc Rotenberg Electronic Privacy Information Center MIT Press, 1997 Hardcover ISBN: 0-262-01162-X $25.00 Available through the EPIC Bookstore: http://www.epic.org/bookstore/ Excerpts from the introduction can be found at: http://communication.ucsd.edu/pagre/landscape.html MIT Press Web site: http://mitpress.mit.edu/ Privacy is the capacity to negotiate social relationships by controlling access to personal information. As laws, policies, and technological design increasingly structure people's relationships with social institutions, individual privacy faces new threats and new opportunities. Over the last several years, the realm of technology and privacy has been transformed, creating a landscape that is both dangerous and encouraging. Significant changes include large increases in communications bandwidths; the widespread adoption of computer networking and public-key cryptography; mathematical innovations that promise a vast family of protocols for protecting identity in complex transactions; new digital media that support a wide range of social relationships; a new generation of technologically sophisticated privacy activists; a massive body of practical experience in the development and application of data-protection laws; and the rapid globalization of manufacturing, culture, and policy making. The essays in this book provide a new conceptual framework for the analysis and debate of privacy policy and for the design and development of information systems. The authors are international experts in the technical, economic, and political aspects of privacy; the book's strength is its synthesis of the three. The book provides equally strong analyses of privacy issues in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Contributors: Philip E. Agre Beyond the mirror world: Privacy and the representational practices of computing Victoria Bellotti Design for privacy in multimedia computing and communications environments Colin J. Bennett Convergence revisited: Towards a global policy for personal data protection Herbert Burkert Privacy enhancing technologies: Typology, vision, critique Simon G. Davies Re-engineering the privacy right: How privacy has been transformed from a right to a commodity David H. Flaherty Controlling surveillance: Can privacy protection be made effective? Robert Gellman Does privacy law work? Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger Generational development of data protection in Europe David J. Phillips Cryptography, secrets, and the structuring of trust Rohan Samarajiva Interactivity as though privacy mattered

1 0

Re: PGPsdk is now free for non-commercial use
by phelix＠vallnet.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 16 Nov 1997 22:18:39 -0600, Alan Olsen <alan(a)clueserver.org> wrote: >>From what I have read of the license it is against the license agreement to >ship the libraries on a CD of shareware products for which a price is charged. > >If I were to create a program using the libraries and upload them to Simtel >or one of the other big archives, it could not be distributed on a Simtel >CD-ROM that someone was charging money for. (Ignoring the usual export >issues.) > >I see this as a big problem. This, unfortunately, is a non-issue. I just reread the license agreement and noticed the following: Non-Commercial Distribution License. Subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, PGP hereby grants to you or your organization a limited, nonexclusive, nontransferable license (a) to incorporate [... stuff deleted ...] and (b) to reproduce and distribute the Bundled Freeware Application to end users solely by electronic means (for example, posting on networks or Internet sites for others to download), So, the only way to really (legally) distribute this would be on your own web site, or a web site that will never be picked up on a cdrom distribution. The as of yet unreleased shareware licensing agreements will probably cover cdrom distribution. -- Phelix (ps. always read anything written by lawyers twice)

1 0

[FWD] Finding a Face in the Crowd
by Steve Schear 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: Jeffrey Waters 000-000-0000 <WATERSJ1(a)mail.firn.edu> Date: 06 Nov 1997 08:23:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: Finding a Face in the Crowd Found this on a visit to "Science NEWS - EurekAlert! Public Contents" at http://www.eurekalert.org . Interesting to note that the technology was developed with US military funding and is commercially marketed in the EU. Oh well Mr. Orwell, you've never believe how far we've come... "Mugspot" Can Find A Face In The Crowd - Award-Winning Face-Recognition Software Prepares to Go to Work in the Streets Computer "eyes" are now up to such tasks as watching for fugitives in airline terminals and other busy locations. A sophisticated face-recognition system that placed first in recent Army competitive trials has been given the added ability to pick out faces in noisy or chaotic "street" environments. The new "Mugspot" software module developed at the University of Southern California automatically analyzes video images, looking for passers-by. When it finds them, it picks out the heads in the images and then tracks the heads for as long as they remain in the camera's field. Throughout this tracking process, the software is watching for the best possible view of the subject's face -- the one that shows him or her looking most directly at the camera. It selects the best view presented and passes it on to the main face-recognition program. This face-recognition software, developed at USC and the University of Bochum, Germany, and now in commercial use for clients such as Germany's Deutsche Bank, is robust enough to make identifications from less-than- perfect face views. It can also often see through such impediments to identification as mustaches, beards, changed hair styles and glasses -- even sunglasses. <...snip...> Cameras mounted in airports and bus stations, or aimed at oncoming cars at traffic intersections, might continuously watch for known fugitives, von der Malsburg says. Bank surveillance cameras could identify persons seen at previous bank robberies. The Mugspot system can scan eight video frames per second in real time, and takes about 13 seconds to select the best view, process it for identification, compare it to the several hundred faces in its memory and decide whether it has found a match. The three research associates who developed Mugspot with von der Malsburg -- USC graduate student Egor Elagin, postdoctoral researcher Hartmut Neven and Bochum University visiting graduate student Johannes Steffens -- believe further refinement of the system can shorten that time by half. Mugspot is only the latest improvement in the USC/Bochum face recognition software, developed with funds from the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) and marketed commercially in Europe under the trade-name ZN-Face. <...snip...> The USC/Bochum system also shone in tests conducted under substandard lighting conditions: It lost only a small fraction of its accuracy, while competitors showed drastic falloffs in less-than-brilliant illumination. The USC/Bochum system uses an unusual approach that mimics the technique scientists believe the brain uses to recognize images. Von der Malsburg, whose principal research interests lie in the investigation of living brains, in fact carried out much of the original research on the system as part of an attempt to understand human face recognition. His research led to creating a computer model of the way the brain's visual cortex processes information. EM.MALSBURG3 -USC- NOV. 5, 1997 For Immediate Release: 5 November 1997 Contact: Eric Mankin mankin(a)usc.edu 213 740 9344 from the University of Southern California News Service 3620 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2538 Tel: 213 740 2215 Fax: 213 740 7600 http://www.usc.edu

1 0

Re: PGPsdk is now free for non-commercial use
by Alan Olsen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 05:11 AM 11/17/97 +0000, phelix(a)vallnet.com wrote: > >On 16 Nov 1997 22:18:39 -0600, Alan Olsen <alan(a)clueserver.org> wrote: > >>>From what I have read of the license it is against the license agreement to >>ship the libraries on a CD of shareware products for which a price is charged. >> >>If I were to create a program using the libraries and upload them to Simtel >>or one of the other big archives, it could not be distributed on a Simtel >>CD-ROM that someone was charging money for. (Ignoring the usual export >>issues.) >> >>I see this as a big problem. > >This, unfortunately, is a non-issue. I just reread the license agreement >and noticed the following: > >Non-Commercial Distribution License. > > Subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, PGP hereby >grants to you or your organization a limited, nonexclusive, nontransferable >license (a) to incorporate [... stuff deleted ...] >and (b) to reproduce and distribute the Bundled Freeware Application to end >users solely by electronic means (for example, posting on networks or >Internet sites for others to download), > >So, the only way to really (legally) distribute this would be on your own >web site, or a web site that will never be picked up on a cdrom >distribution. > >The as of yet unreleased shareware licensing agreements will probably cover >cdrom distribution. Freeware and shareware often share the same distribution channel. It kind of puts a crimp in distribution if you cannot upload to any archive that might wind up on a cd-rom. (Furthermore, uploads to those archives are not always under the control of the author.) Hopefully they will go back and update the freeware license agreement as well. --- | "That'll make it hot for them!" - Guy Grand | |"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: | | mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man | |`finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.| | http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan(a)ctrl-alt-del.com|

1 0

Tim plans to kill a federal judge
by Tim May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 3:43 PM -0700 11/13/97, Neva Remailer wrote: >Robert Hettinga wrote: >>> If Tim and others fail to exercise their right to say what they >>> believe, then it is likely those rights will be suspended in due >>> time. >> >>Like I said before, it makes sense, but not because Foucault said >>it. Broken clocks, and all that. Besides, Monty, I hate appeals to >>authority almost as much as I hate ad honminae. I just saw this, courtesy of Monty's reply. This is really rich. Hettinga hates "ad hominae." This from the guy who started this latest flame war with such choice phrases as: "Tim's Way Cool Latter-Day Farnham's-Freehold in the Santa Clara mountains.... a bunch of "freedom fighters" like the one you fancy yourself to be these days... instead of shoving your favorite Mac-10 up the nose of every statist treehugger you bump into out there in lotusland.... you won't have to clean the snot off the end of your gunbarrel so often..." Hettinga, heal thyself. A comment or two on the rest of what Monty is saying: >Are you asking me to use Foucault's line without giving him credit? >That doesn't seem right to me. > >Foucault's essay was insightful and significantly influenced my point >of view. Not only does he deserve the credit, but mentioning his name >may direct other interested readers toward his work. > >BTW, how much of Foucault have you actually read? I am generally >unfamiliar with his work, but I have a sinking feeling the same can be >said for certain of his critics. > >It is easy to give French intellectuals a cursory reading and conclude >that there is nothing there. However, often there is quite a lot of >something there, but it comes from people with a different >intellectual tradition than our own so it is harder to understand. An >apparently absurd sentence is often a reference to a body of work with >which we are not familiar. By the way, the same can be said about the work of Heidegger, a thinker who has had some influence on me. Whenever I cite anything Heidegger ever said, I can count on some numbskull to parrot the "Heidegger was a Nazi" shtick. (These same kind of folks use to automatically label anything Nietzsche said as tainted because of the Nazi's later affinity for some of his works, but the "rehabilitation" of Nietzsche has been largely successful, and N. is of course now a hero of the Left. Whatever. Nietzsche was of course neither a leftist nor a rightist...he was just who he was.) Hettinga has admitted basic ignorance of Foucault, just as he backpedalled furiously on the "Aurora" claims he made. (about Hettinga's repeated, and loud, claims in recent days that I have called for the death of a federal judge) >Tim has repeatedly made it clear to the world that this was not his >meaning. What is your purpose in declaring otherwise? > Hettinga shows his true colors by repeating these lies over and over again. I would not be at all surprised if he has forwarded carefully excerpted fragments to his friendly FBI offices, hoping they'll make a move to investigate me. >In every other instance in which Tim has discussed capital punishment, >it has been in the context of a trial. > >If OJ had committed a brutal murder in a state without the death >penalty, say Massachusetts, and Tim said "OJ is guilty of a capital >crime", would you conclude that he was calling for his murder? > I have, over the years, expressed my constitutional opinion about many people whom I think have committed capital crimes. OJ, of course. And Lon Horiuchi, the shooter at Ruby Ridge. And, if you check the archives, Tim McVeigh. Fact is, many people have committed capital crimes. And I don't particularly feel like paying my share of the $50-100K a year to keep them well fed and housed at Club Fed, so I'd just as soon spend a quarter on a rifle round and be done with them. I don't have a clue who "Monty Cantsin" is, but his clear thinking makes it kind of a shame he will remain a nym forever, unless he declares himself. (No one, not even Vinge or Card, ever said nyms would carry the same reputation capital True Names do. Maybe someday. But not in the foreseeable future.) >Clearly that would not be reasonable. So why do you feel the meaning >changes when "OJ" is substituted for "The judge"? Perhaps you harbor >latent urges to murder our public officials and wish to draw attention >from yourself by pointing the finger at Tim. You seem to be talking >about it more than anybody else. > Indeed. Hettinga keeps quoting this "Tim plans to kill a federal judge" mantra so much that I'd better rename the thread to this just to keep Hettinga happy. There, it's done. >Incidentally, it is well documented that in the 1980s, the USG had >detailed plans for mass arrests of dissident citizens. Ten army camps >had been selected for this purpose. The plan was to be executed in >the event the country invaded Nicaragua. The USG has incarcerated >masses of U.S. citizens without trial at least twice during the 20th >century. > Yep. And to show that I am not the jingoist Ito presumes I am, arresting and imprisoning those of Japanese descent without due process was, of course, a capital crime. Had I been a Japanese-American, deprived of my liberty for several years, with no evidence that I had committed a crime, and with my property forfeited to the government (often for failure to pay taxes--duh!!!!), I'd have advocated the death penalty for those who falsely imprisoned me and stole my land. But most Jap immigrants were wimps. .... >Perhaps it is your turn to crack open a book and find the reference. >I would be quite interested (and surprised) if you can substantiate >your claim. Hettinga doesn't bother with research. He just shoots from the hip. He concentrates on _style_ over substance. Must be his liberal arts training. --Tim May The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

2 1

kiwi not home (was: getting premail)
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Igor Chudov wrote: > > Bill Stewart wrote: > > > > At 11:11 PM 11/13/1997 -0600, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > > >Anyone know of a WORKING site where I can download premail from? > > >kiwi...berkeley is refusing connections. > > > > http://atropos.c2.net/~raph/premail.html > > > > Also look at www.publius.net > > Nope, all of these sites refer me to kiwi, which is refusing > connections. kiwi is NOT refusing connections. It is just not there. There's a difference. The host: http://kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu/ does not respond to connection requests to port 80, nor 8080, nor 8001. Ping yields "Host lookup failed - Non-authoritative host not found." The browser indicates it is trying to contact, which can mean anything up to and including that it is awaiting a cascading name lookup, but has not yet opened a TCP connection to the target. I'm guessing kiwi is Raph's computer in Computer Science and that maybe it is hosed. Maybe Raph has been hosed... "(WHAP!) Tell us the name of your leader! (WHAP!) Talk! (WHAP!)" Maybe Raph will turn up one of these days writing plaintive notes of contrition. Maybe... oh, never mind. Oddly, while Raph has a home page at www.cs.berkeley.edu and at atropos.c2.net/, all the critical roads seem to lead to kiwi, including the mixmaster list. Search engines show precious few references to critical remailer files except in the links that point to the dead host. Is it really this easy to make the whole remailer network go stale -- like cutting off jet fighter spare parts to suddenly unfriendly nation-states? Wouldn't it be prudent to mirror the remailer lists, keys and stats at a few dozen places scattered around the world? Would it take more than a few percent of the effort and time that have recently been pissed down a hole writing and reading the flames that have consumed the list of late? Hmmmm?

2 1

Re: PGPsdk is now free for non-commercial use
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:25 PM 11/16/97 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: >I'm pleased to see PGP Inc. permitting development of freeware, >but at leased from a first reading of the license, >it's a _really_ restrictive definition of "freeware" - >not only does the software have to be free, but it can only be used >in extremely restrictively non-commercial activities. The idea is simple: you make money from software that costs the authors lots of money to develop or use their software in a business environment (=to make money), you have to pay the people that spent time, effort, and, yes, money, on making it happen. Sounds reasonable to me. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

1 2

Re: Tim May's offensive racism (was: about RC4)
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> wrote: > At 10:37 PM -0700 11/12/97, Nobuki Nakatuji wrote: > >There are RC4 sourcecode in ftp.replay.com. > >but, Is it same RC4 developed RSADSI ? > > > > It am developed. > > You go back where you came. You go back hotmail. We tired your stupid > questions on RC4 and your Misty posts. > > Sayonara! > > (And they wonder why we kicked Japan's butt.) Paul Bradley <paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk> writes: > As for white supremacy, look elsewhere, I think you`ll > find Tim`s post an example of what the developed world knows as humour, > not a serious attack on any ethnic group. Tim May's post seems funny to you? Not a racist comment? His imitation of a Japanese accent is purely offensive. Paul, would you feel comfortable offering this kind of "humor" in a gathering which included Japanese visitors, perhaps potential customers? That comment about kicking Japan's butt would really be humorous, wouldn't it? It is astonishing that people like you and William Geiger, who apparently make their living as consultants, feel so comfortable publicly approving racist comments directed against the Japanese. Does William expect ever to work with a Japanese customer, after suggesting that Truman should have dropped additional atomic bombs on Japan? Even if you share Tim May's lack of moral constraint, you presumably do not also share his wealth. Pragmatic considerations alone should make you reluctant to be an apologist for racist comments, or in William's case to compound the error with shockingly offensive remarks of his own.

11 16

Re: trusting untrusted platforms
by Ryan Lackey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > Alexandre Maret <amaret(a)infomaniak.ch> says: > > [how to do trusted computation on untrusted platforms] I'm working on a paper, it's one of the technical hurdles on the way to my Eternity DDS eternity service implementation. > rdl, less frustrated with changing from vtwm/athena to KDE, says: > I so far have been approaching it as "Type I (active)" and "Type II (passive)" > attackers. In the first case, people lie about the results, in the second, > they give you the correct results, but snoop on the data. (For some reason > the terminology is kind of lame, but it helps to have some) > > There are a bunch of mathematical/cryptographic ways of hiding data from > those doing computations on it, at least for a subset of computations. I'm > trying to put together a generalized computing model for this which would be > turing complete if it can be, although it is not clear it can be. Some > operations practically will be a lot more expensive in this model than in > the conventional environment, and perhaps to a computation which would require > 10 units of conventional secret CPU time, you will need 9 units of secret > CPU to encode/decode the data and 41 units of public CPU time. You also need > to guard against covert channels, such as the total amount of public CPU time > you are requesting as a clue to what you're doing with it. I am confident > type II security can be realized with at least a minor amount of performance > improvement over purely secret use, assuming public time is free. > > Type I security is a lot more difficult to realize in true theoretical > sense, but is easier in a practical sense. A simple solution is to do the > same computation on a bunch of different remote machines, and as long as > they don't collude, you can just make sure they all answered the same, modulo > rounding errors and stuff. This isn't the kind of provable security you > can conceivably get against type II attackers, but it doesn't have any innate > performance hit. > > It's possible there are systems which are byzantine fault tolerant to > the former kind of attack -- instinctively, you can just split up the > computation in small enough pieces that you don't care if it is compromised. > > I'm interested in finding a provably secure computation-checksum technique. > I think there are most likely reductions for a lot of problems to things > which can be verified, and again, my goal is to have a Turing-complete > model of computation with this property. > > > [can cryptography be helpful?] > > It's as much a theory of computation problem as anything else, once you > have some functions through which you can carry some operations. > > Most of the stuff I've done so far focuses on the graph coloring problem. > I'm probably going to finish a quick version which can only deal with > a subset of problems, then work on a general model. > > [paper availability issues] > Yes, it will be publically available. It will be available when it's closer > to done; I will send something to cypherpunks about it, and I'll put it > up on the web somewhere. If it doesn't suck, and I can convince someone > at LCS-CIS of this/to be a co-author/etc., I might try to get it published. Anyone know anything very relevant to this? I've mostly just started on the research (my current exciting project has been Linux Fibre Channel and making a bloody fast, yet maybe secure, yet small cipher for an on board processor), and pointers would be useful. It isn't as hard a problem as I first thought, though. This seems like the kind of thing everyone's favorite judge-threatening tree-hugger-nose-mac-10-inserting gun-hoarding old-man-on-the-mountain would have done N years ago :) [flames, fan. gasoline. rdx...] so I'd rather not reinvent the wheel more than once or twice. Ryan (getting dangerously close to having a working Eternity DDS demo, and wondering if FC98 will be on mbone, particularly the solar eclipse, since even if he had the money to go, it's in the middle of next semester, and disappearing for a week would kind of be difficult, although not at all impossible of someone wants to pay for me to go...ahh, but there's always next year) -- Ryan Lackey rdl(a)mit.edu http://mit.edu/rdl/

2 1

Racism: Wrong or incorrect?
by nobody＠neva.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Racism is one of those very interesting topics to discuss because large areas of the discussion are forbidden territory. Is racism wrong or is it incorrect? The most generally held belief in the United States is that it is wrong to express racist ideas publicly, but that many of these ideas are, in fact, correct. Most white Americans truly believe in their innermost hearts that black Americans are fundamentally more violent, less intelligent, and to be pitied. At the same time, many of these white Americans believe they are committing some sort of sin in having these beliefs. If the belief is true, how can it be sinful to believe it? If it is not true, then why believe it? A good friend was driving through the American South recently. He is not of the dominant racial group. He was involved in more than one scary incident on his drive. What was initially surprising to me was that he said he sort of preferred the South to the North because at least in the South people were more "up front." When you think about it for a minute that makes a lot of sense. Who would want to spend time with people who are patronizing? This can be seen in just about every aspect of the racial policies of the United States government. The fundamental assumption of an affirmative action program is that nobody would actually want to hire a member of the subordinate ethnic group. When somebody chooses to hire based on ethnicity it doesn't hurt their business in most cases. The advocates of affirmative action claim not be racists, yet we rarely find them promoting racial integration in the work place by advertising the fantastic deal which is available by hiring people who are irrationally discriminated against by other employers. We must conclude that many advocates of affirmative action believe that the subordinate group is actually inferior in many ways. It's good for people to discuss their ideas. That's how we arrive at truth and mutual understanding. It is terribly unfortunate that discussions of racism, which is allegedly an important topic, have been methodically discouraged for a number of decades in the United States. On one hand, I would prefer Tim had not made his "go now, chop chop" posts. I would like to see Nobuki Nakatuji stay around, write code, master English, American culture, and Cypherpunk Life. Tim's comments may not promote that. On the other hand, I'm not sure it's a good idea to discourage anyone's explorations into certain highly forbidden areas. Somehow the work of Robert Crumb comes to mind. Crumb has dallied with a number of forbidden racial and sexual ideas. I can't even say I like the feeling or the tone of his work, yet, somehow, there is something of value there which is hard to articulate. Of course, what is most interesting about Tim's comments is that he appears to be out on the end of three bell curves in the United States: 1. He does not believe (I think) that it is morally wrong to have a racist belief. 2. He does not believe racist beliefs are a correct description of reality. 3. He says what he thinks. Another curious aspect of the taboos on racial discussions is the weird racially defined double standard of conduct. Black power is more or less an acceptable topic of discussion. White power is absolutely not. Why? Monty Cantsin Editor in Chief Smile Magazine http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNG5Jv5aWtjSmRH/5AQEHCgf+KL2HDx4yhn/pDPPuEs4cEW9R6FI4sIfn LJvbuKAEdl0GRs5HmMRvM9I8OtYHJVCNDsmetneHo7ME6Qhc5s5ilvA4mu7oCfcy YKfQmQSM+OvtkHtladI0CY5xUvFkoazzBuXNfnopdK5uY22xm80brT/8tOymdIT6 avSYGbHdNkL70TZ0rRNLmUVTYCO1HLVpuPnL3EbZye51f6vnBkV4R22lr+1NDKPi 6LLpO+WqjZAma7Pymqy6RCzztsnt9YbvxbCZOOWxCrGJAK36ZBFtKs//jp9oenRV Bq7h9Uyut81W9sw5kER1C+CgN+k1ZCM+6UDpGNI6n89uQSHX/x/wog== =hVb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1