December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Corrected Printing of Applied Cryptography Now Available
by Bruce Schneier 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wiley has finally published a corrected printing of Applied Cryptography, 2nd ed!!! They didn't correct everything, only changes that didn't affect page breaks. Still, I counted over 250 individual corrections. And under a dozen errors remaining. I'm thrilled that they finally did this. The fifth printing (or greater) is the corrected printing. To find what printing you own, turn to page iv (it's opposite the "Contents in Brief" page). The last line (under "Printed in the United States of America") is a series of numbers, counting down from 10. The lowest number is the printing. You have a fifth printing if your last line looks like: 10 9 8 7 6 5 If you want to buy a fifth printing, you have two options. One, you can go to a bookstore and find one. You can't ask the bookstore to buy a fifth printing; all he can do is order a copy of the book and hope for the best. I believe that the fourth printing is sold out (in softcover, at least), but I cannot be sure. The other option is to buy it from me. I have a large supply of fifth printings that I will sell at the usual 15% discount: softcover - $42.00 hardcover - $59.00 Postage is as follows: surface to US - $3.00 air to US - $5.00 Canada - $5.00 surface elsewhere - $5.00 Contact me if you want airmail overseas. It's expensive. Cheers, Bruce ************************************************************************ * Bruce Schneier 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,002,000, * Counterpane Systems 000,000,000,000,000,000,002,000,000,002,293 * schneier(a)counterpane.com The last prime number...alphabetically! * (612) 823-1098 Two vigintillion, two undecillion, two * 101 E Minnehaha Pkwy trillion, two thousand, two hundred and * Minneapolis, MN 55419 ninety three. * http://www.counterpane.com ************************************************************************

1 0

ALERT: Groups urge passage of pro-crypto legislation (4/28/1997)
by Shabbir J. Safdar 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

============================================================================== ___ _ _____ ____ _____ _ / _ \| | | ____| _ \_ _| | THE HOUSE PREPARES TO ENSURE ENCRYPTION | |_| | | | _| | |_) || | | | AND PRIVACY ON THE INTERNET; SAFE | _ | |___| |___| _ < | | |_| BILL (HR 695) ABOUT TO BE VOTED ON! |_| |_|_____|_____|_| \_\|_| (_) April 28, 1997 Do not forward this alert after June 1, 1997. This alert brought to you by: Americans for Tax Reform Center for Democracy and Technology Eagle Forum EF-Florida Electronic Frontier Foundation Electronic Privacy Information Ctr. Voters Telecommunications Watch Wired Magazine _____________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents What's Happening Right Now What You Can Do To Help Privacy And Security On The Internet Background On SAFE (HR 695) Why Is This Issue Important To Internet Users? About This Alert / Participating Organizations _____________________________________________________________________________ WHAT'S HAPPENING RIGHT NOW HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO VOTE ON "SAFE" PRO-INTERNET PRIVACY BILL The House Judiciary Committee is set to vote on a bill designed to protect privacy and promote electronic commerce on the Internet as early as the second week of May. The SAFE bill will also be considered by a Judiciary subcommittee this week and is expected to pass without difficulty. The House Judiciary committee vote on HR695 will mark a critical stage in the effort to pass real reform of US encryption policy in a way that protects privacy, promotes electronic commerce, and recognizes the realities of the global Internet. Although no bill is perfect, Internet advocates including CDT, EFF, EPIC, VTW and others, including the Internet Privacy Coalition, have expressed support for the bill. Supporters agree that the SAFE bill holds great promise for enhancing privacy and security on the Internet and have offered their strong support and suggestions to improve it in a detailed letter at http://www.privacy.org/ipc/safe_letter.html Please take a moment to read the attached alert, and make a phone call to urge the committee to pass the bill. _______________________________________________________________________ WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP PRIVACY AND SECURITY ON THE INTERNET 1. Check out the information on the SAFE bill below. 2. Call the Representative on the Judiciary committee from your state. Note that there may be more than one person from your state on the committee. The list is enclosed below the telephone script. SAMPLE SCRIPT You: <dial Capitol switchboard +1.202.224.3121> May I speak to the office of Rep. (INSERT NAME FROM LIST BELOW) Them: Hello, Rep. Mojo's office! You: May I speak with the staffer who deals with Internet or telecom issues? Them: One minute.. SAY You: Hello! HR695 will be voted on by the Judiciary committee in a THIS-> couple of weeks. I'm calling to urge Rep. Mojo to pass the bill because it's important to security and privacy on the Internet. Them: Thanks, goodbye! You: Goodbye! <click> If you have concerns about specific improvements to the bill, bringing them up when you're on the phone with the staffer is a good opportunity for raising issues. Judiciary Committee Members (from committee Web page) MR. HYDE (ILLINOIS), CHAIRMAN Mr. Sensenbrenner (Wisconsin) Mr. Conyers (Michigan) Mr. McCollum (Florida) Mr. Frank (Massachusetts) Mr. Gekas (Pennsylvania) Mr. Schumer (New York) Mr. Coble (North Carolina) Mr. Berman (California) Mr. Smith (Texas) Mr. Boucher (Virginia) Mr. Schiff (New Mexico) Mr. Nadler (New York) Mr. Gallegly (California) Mr. Scott (Virginia) Mr. Canady (Florida) Mr. Watt (North Carolina) Mr. Inglis (South Carolina) Ms. Lofgren (California) Mr. Goodlatte (Virginia) Ms. Jackson Lee (Texas) Mr. Buyer (Indiana) Ms. Waters (California) Mr. Bono (California) Mr. Meehan (Massachusetts) Mr. Bryant (Tennessee) Mr. Delahunt (Massachusetts) Mr. Chabot (Ohio) Mr. Wexler (Florida) Mr. Barr (Georgia) Mr. Rothman (New Jersey) Mr. Jenkins (Tennessee) Mr. Hutchinson (Arkansas) Mr. Pease (Indiana) Mr. Cannon (Utah) 3. *IMPORTANT* Touch base with us at http://www.crypto.com/feedback/ and let us know how the phone call went. Fill out the easy to use form to let us know what happened during your phone call. 4. Pass this alert on to others until June 1 You've taken the first step to being a part of the powerful political force of Americans concerned about the health and safety of the Internet, but have your friends? Forward this alert to them until June 1, 1997 and urge them to adopt their legislator at http://www.crypto.com/adopt/ 5. Be proud of yourself and relax! You've done more to protect the Internet in five minutes than many people will do this year. ________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND ON SAFE (HR 695) In early May, the Judiciary Committee will be voting on whether to send HR 695, the Security and Freedom Through Encryption (SAFE) Act, on to the full House of Representatives. The SAFE Bill, introduced by Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Anna Eshoo (D-CA), would promote privacy and security on the Internet by: * relaxing current export controls on encryption technologies; * prohibiting the government from imposing "key-escrow" or "key- recovery" inside the United States, and; * addresses concerns from law enforcement about the use of encryption in the furtherance of a crime. The SAFE bill enjoys broad bi-partisan support and currently has 78 co-sponsors. Although no bill is ever perfect, the SAFE bill, along with Pro-CODE, a similar bill in the Senate sponsored by Sens. Burns (R-MT) and Leahy (D-VT), represent the best chance yet of passing real reform of US encryption policy. The Senate Commerce Committee is expected to hold a markup on Pro-CODE soon. The Clinton Administration, through the FBI and NSA, is working hard behind the scenes to block passage of SAFE and Pro-CODE. The Administration favors an approach which would limit the availability of privacy-protecting encryption technologies and compel American Citizens to ensure law enforcement access to their private online communications. By passing the SAFE bill and sending on to the floor, the House Judiciary Committee will send a strong signal to the Administration that Congress is serious about passing real reform of US encryption policy, and would represent an important victory in the fight for privacy on the Internet. Detailed background information, including the full text of the bill, and analysis is available online at http://www.crypto.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ WHY IS THIS ISSUE IMPORTANT TO INTERNET USERS? Encryption technologies are the locks and keys of the Information age -- enabling individuals and businesses to protect sensitive information as it is transmitted over the Internet. As more and more individuals and businesses come online, the need for strong, reliable, easy-to-use encryption technologies has become a critical issue to the health and viability of the Net. Current US encryption policy, which limits the strength of encryption products US companies can sell abroad, also limits the availability of strong, easy-to-use encryption technologies in the United States. US hardware and software manufacturers who wish to sell their products on the global market must either conform to US encryption export limits or produce two separate versions of the same product, a costly and complicated alternative. The export controls, which the NSA and FBI argue help to keep strong encryption out of the hands of foreign adversaries, are having the opposite effect. Strong encryption is available abroad, but because of the export limits and the confusion created by nearly four years of debate over US encryption policy, strong, easy-to-use privacy and security technologies are not widely available off the shelf or "on the net" here in the US. A recently discovered flaw in the security of the new digital telephone network exposed the worst aspects of the Administration's encryption policy. Because the designers needed to be able to export their products, the system's security was "dumbed down". Researchers subsequently discovered that it is quite easy to break the security of the system and intrude on what should be private conversations. This incident underscores the larger policy problem: US companies are at a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace when competing against companies that do not have such hindrances. And now, for the first time in history, the Clinton Administration has proposed DOMESTIC RESTRICTIONS on the ability of Americans to protect their privacy and security online. All of us care about our national security, and no one wants to make it any easier for criminals and terrorists to commit criminal acts. But we must also recognize encryption technologies can aid law enforcement and protect national security by limiting the threat of industrial espionage and foreign spying, promote electronic commerce and protecting privacy. What's at stake in this debate is nothing less than the future of privacy and the fate of the Internet as a secure and trusted medium for commerce, education, and political discourse. _____________________________________________________________________________ ABOUT THIS ALERT / PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS For more information, contact the following organizations who have signed onto this effort at their web sites. Americans for Tax Reform http://www.atr.org Center for Democracy and Technology http://www.cdt.org Eagle Forum http://www.eagleforum.org EF-Florida http://www.efflorida.org Electronic Frontier Foundation http://www.eff.org Electronic Privacy Information Center http://www.epic.org Voters Telecommunications Watch http://www.vtw.org Wired Magazine http://www.wired.com _____________________________________________________________________________ end alert ==============================================================================

1 0

ZDNet Special Offer: PC Tech Forum Discount!
by announce＠lists.zdnet.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-------------------------------------------------------------------- ZDNET ANNOUNCEMENT 5/1/97 -------------------------------------------------------------------- PC Week and PC Magazine, co-sponsors of PC Tech Forum, have an exclusive offer for ZDNet members: Attend PC Tech Forum on May 20- 21 for a *SPECIAL* low rate of $995 - a $200 discount! What: PC Tech Forum Where: Hyatt Regency/San Francisco Airport, Burlingame, California When: May 20-21, pre- and post-conference seminars May 19 and 22 PC Tech Forum, hosted by Michael Slater, Founder and Principal Analyst of Microprocessor Report and MicroDesign Resource, is your chance to get a comprehensive look at the state of the PC technology. If you design or market PCs or PC components, make major technology adoption decisions, or need to know which companies have the best PC technology, PC Tech Forum is for you. Highlights of the conference: * Find out where the PC market is headed with presentations from Jim Louderback of PC Week, Robin Raskin of Family PC,and Aaron Goldberg of Computer Intelligence. * Panel discussions with ZD's leading editors, including Michael Miller and Bill Howard of PC Magazine, and top industry analysts. * A hard look at the technologies competing to reduce the total cost of PC ownership including Java, NetPCs, and network computers. * Roadmaps for critical PC technologies like microprocessors, memory, diskdrives, and displays. * Information on PC system architecture issues including PC designs using Pentium II plus AGP and key trends in notebook design. * Intel, Microsoft, and others on the future of 3D and DVD. * A look ahead to the challenge faced by the traditional PC industry from Windows CE, information appliances, game machines, and WebTV. In addition to the two day conference, you can also attend pre and post conference seminars on key PC technologies including "CPU Strategies for PCs," "New DRAMs for Main Memory and Graphics," and "DVD and 3D Technology for the PC". To register at this special low rate of $995, please call 800.527.0288 (US and Canada) or 707.824.4001 (international) before May 15 and refer to the source code "PCTFZD". For complete information on the conference, visit the PC Tech Forum website at: http://www.mdronline.com/pctfnow. _______________________________________________________________ ZDNet Announcements are periodic notices of new features, special events and free offers available to members of ZDNet. --To subscribe to ZDNet Announcements, please send mail to: announce-on(a)lists.zdnet.com You can leave the subject and body blank. --To unsubscribe to ZDNet Announcements, please send mail to: announce-off(a)lists.zdnet.com You can leave the subject and body blank. _______________________________________________________________ Powered by Mercury Mail: http://www.merc.com

2 1

off-topic/Flying cows
by harka＠nycmetro.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I just had to forward this...<G> (translated from a german newsservice) -=> Quoting In:germnews@listserv.gmd.de to Harka <=- Last Page: Flying cow sinks japanese fishing boat Wladiwostok. A cow fell out of an airplane before the siberian coast and smashed onto japanese fishing boat, causing it to sink. That reported the German Embassy in Moscow in an internal note to the [german] State Department. Appearantly a russian military plane was flying over the Ochotskian sea with stolen cows on board; the cows started panicking and made the airplane instable in it's flight - they weren't tied to the walls. Therefore the pilots used the last possibility: they opened the back door and moved the cows out of the machine. One of the cows hit a japanese fishing boat and turned it over. The crew could save themselves to the coast, where they were arrested by russian guards, who wouldn't believe the cow story - until an investigation proved it valid. A russian official responsible for traffic is supposed to have mentioned this case to the German Embassy as a strange example for the terrible condition of russian flight safety. The State Department would neither confirm nor deny the incident. Ciao Harka /*************************************************************/ /* This user supports FREE SPEECH ONLINE ...more info at */ /* and PRIVATE ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS! -> http://www.epic.org */ /* E-mail: harka(at)nycmetro.com (PGP-encrypted mail pref'd) */ /* PGP public key available upon request. [KeyID: 04174301] */ /* F-print: FD E4 F8 6D C1 6A 44 F5 28 9C 40 6E B8 94 78 E8 */ /*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*/ /* May there be peace in this world, may all anger dissolve */ /* and may all living beings find the way to happiness... */ /*************************************************************/ ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAgUBM2WN0jltEBIEF0MBAQErxwf/RYxrpCMrjqdd+PA7DU5E9i/sIIQguKnN +LlbHifsXXdPD6g5NIxbvUMH9ELagnld2qKScynJNtBDFiNYfIuyVWFJFUVOh4L0 VQjrM/6s3hLapHYS09JNBh2B6MgI3HbAfTngY5qwwU4gq7ia646d8Sj/B/Qb+MJz RYFAvF1VUzSC9oQUHZDeAnO/VwN5d2APQFS+6X0Qbo4lSbhSZiK2tV1xFoVcRN4D Kd17Ec6y/Um4Wwr6Y/yhfR4R8Z1xfojZhnQ/USq+hgPg+CqzIYHzpymQNHju2mvr /SAHJIh5KZTV692+Rdo/iHOrBVg0KoX+6fuVH+weYTw4+kBJtPKQjg== =nFLz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...

2 1

Re: Netscape plans to support GAK
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Robert Hettinga wrote: >Yup. Looks like Barksdale(?) was right in his Pro-Excrow comments two years >ago in Boston after all. > >Mr. Weinstein's Black Rhino Ammunition Inc. "Mr. Kevlar" award went for >naught, I'm afraid... While it might be too touchy for Netscaper cryptographers to address openly, I wonder if there is not a scheme afoot to go along with the current restrictions in order to be better positioned to compete with others intending to launch robust encryption as soon as the leak in the dam globally breaks. There may be more to this story than appears in the PR of industry and government. The crypto fight may be a diversion. Suppose the governments intend to relax crypto restrictions once other technologies to monitor electronic transactions are in place and and enforcers have been trained to snare illegal transactors based on physical evidence of crime beyond the digital. Recall that that's what Peter Neumann and others on the NRC crypto panel suggested as an agenda for the FBI to forego undue crypto emphasis. Is it not possible that the US and other nations will allow strong encryption so long as other means are at hand to control any action merely cloaked in encrypted language, as has been done forever with stylistic literature and speech? To, as with its predecessors, tolerate the artist of cryptoanarchy but guillotine the actor.

1 0

No Subject
by Mix 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timothy Mayflower studied yoga back-streching exercises for five years so he could blow himself (nobody else will). o/ \ / \ / / \o / \ / \ /o\ / |\ / \

2 1

Re: Fingerprint Stego
by Alec 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 12:37 PM 4/29/97 -0700, Mike Duvos thoughtfully wrote: |A funny story in last night's Seattle Times... | |It seems the INS and FBI are unwilling to grant US citizenship to |persons without legible fingerprints. [snip] Fingerprint escrow? Does this mean that, ipso facto (I love it), physically challenged individuals with missing or deformed hands are excluded regardless of other qualifications? What a monstrosity of a rule! Was this carried over the wire? AP? |"This is not something we take lightly," said INS spokesperson |Irene Mortensen. "We can't just arbitrarily give out citizenship |to just anyone." The fact that Irene Mortensen has citizenship at all proves her point. Is it not possible to retroactively _remove_ the citizenship of such an arrogant bureaucrat to test whether she could make the grade imposed on the rest of the world's "refuse?" "Dear Irene Mortensen: We regret to inform you....." Thanks, Mike, for the increase in BP. Alec -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQCVAgUBM2ZiXiKJGkNBIH7lAQH8CAQArOmQYxiaavj5FXdJUomjviRBcVfkxCRX PWCDZ/wMC68poOWEjKJECKYscVT0kMuw+FMOUKPYlMhR8kK33lvg4tOqbjMKyYMS LZbPU4M+jQNFq3y5c6hFUmtZg8zLATBIeb8lVRnWQ8qChSH8jdTSZLxhmTx8Azgt mrTXcnOk3dQ= =JZZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Fingerprint Stego
by nobody＠huge.cajones.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Alec wrote: > At 12:37 PM 4/29/97 -0700, Mike Duvos thoughtfully wrote: > |A funny story in last night's Seattle Times... > | > |It seems the INS and FBI are unwilling to grant US citizenship to > |persons without legible fingerprints. > > [snip] > > Fingerprint escrow? > > Does this mean that, ipso facto (I love it), physically challenged > individuals with missing or deformed hands are excluded regardless of other > qualifications? What a monstrosity of a rule! Also, can one have one's citizenship revoked if they lose their fingers in a bizarre chainsaw accident? Or if the "Circle of Eunuchs" performs finger-castration on them because they are caught *fingering* people while they sleep? Why are not alternative methods of identification used, such as placing a tattoo on their arms? Or remove the threat they pose to others, by placing them in camps? Other, more crypto-relevant, concerns arise when one considers whether this fingerprint-anonymity is perhaps a form of biological cryptography. Is the person breaking any laws if their fingers leave the country? Can they be required to cut off one of their fingers and send it to the government under fingerprint-crypto escrow laws? Perhaps we need a "Truth in Spokespersoning" law which would require spokespersons to tell it like it is: "We regret to announce that we cannot allow this person to become a citizen, because we consider citizens to be the property of the state, and we need to be able to identify our property. "Of course, there may be other ways to mark the person for identification by the state, but we are too stupid, anal-retentive and uncaring to concern ourselves with looking into these areas. "Besides, we don't have to. We're the government and we can do whatever silly, stupid, uncaring and unjust things we want to our citizens without suffering any consequences for our actions." FingerMonger

1 0

Policy Post 3.03 - House Subcommittee Approves Internet Privacy Bill
by Alan Davidson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- _____ _____ _______ / ____| __ \__ __| ____ ___ ____ __ | | | | | | | | / __ \____ / (_)______ __ / __ \____ _____/ /_ | | | | | | | | / /_/ / __ \/ / / ___/ / / / / /_/ / __ \/ ___/ __/ | |____| |__| | | | / ____/ /_/ / / / /__/ /_/ / / ____/ /_/ (__ ) /_ \_____|_____/ |_| /_/ \____/_/_/\___/\__, / /_/ \____/____/\__/ The Center for Democracy and Technology /____/ Volume 3, Number 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A briefing on public policy issues affecting civil liberties online ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CDT POLICY POST Volume 3, Number 1 April 30, 1997 CONTENTS: (1) House Subcommittee Approves SAFE Internet-privacy bill (3) How to Subscribe/Unsubscribe (4) About CDT, contacting us ** This document may be redistributed freely with this banner intact ** Excerpts may be re-posted with permission of <editor(a)cdt.org> ** This document looks best when viewed in COURIER font ** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVES SAFE INTERNET-PRIVACY BILL The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual property today approved the Security And Freedom through Encryption (SAFE) act (HR 695), sending the SAFE bill to the full House Judiciary Committee. The SAFE bill was passed by the Subcommittee without amendment and with unanimous approval. A House Judiciary Committee vote on SAFE is expected later this month. Today's vote marks a critical step forward in the ongoing fight to reform US encryption policy, and sends a strong signal to the Clinton Administration that Congress is serious about passing real encryption reform legislation. SAFE, and its companion bills in the Senate (Pro-CODE and ECPA II) are vitally represent the best chance yet of reforming US encryption policy in a way that protects privacy, promotes electronic commerce, and recognize the realities of the global economy. The full text of the SAFE bill, along with analysis and background information, is available online at http://www.cdt.org/crypto or http://www.crypto.com/ The Administration's allies did not introduce amendments to SAFE at the subcommittee markup today, though a tougher fight is expected when the bill reaches the full Judiciary Committee later this month. Rep. Bill McCullom (R-FL), voted in favor of the SAFE but expressed concern that the bill does not contain key-recovery provisions. McCullom, a high ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said he hopes to address these concerns when the bill reaches the full committee. Also at the markup, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), an original co-sponsor of SAFE, noted that several privacy organizations, including CDT, have raised concerns about a provision of the bill which criminalizes the use of encryption in furtherance of a crime. Rep. Lofgren pledged to work with the privacy community to try and address these concerns as the bill moves through committee. CDT congratulates the subcommittee on today's vote and looks forward to working with the Congress, our colleagues in the civil liberties and Internet advocacy community, and the computer and communications industries to pass real reform of US encryption policy this year. For more information on what you can do to join the fight, please visit http://www.crypto.com/adopt. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (2) SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION Be sure you are up to date on the latest public policy issues affecting civil liberties online and how they will affect you! Subscribe to the CDT Policy Post news distribution list. CDT Policy Posts, the regular news publication of the Center For Democracy and Technology, are received by nearly 10,000 Internet users, industry leaders, policy makers and activists, and have become the leading source for information about critical free speech and privacy issues affecting the Internet and other interactive communications media. To subscribe to CDT's Policy Post list, send mail to policy-posts-request(a)cdt.org with a subject: subscribe policy-posts If you ever wish to remove yourself from the list, send mail to the above address with a subject of: unsubscribe policy-posts ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) ABOUT THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY/CONTACTING US The Center for Democracy and Technology is a non-profit public interest organization based in Washington, DC. The Center's mission is to develop and advocate public policies that advance democratic values and constitutional civil liberties in new computer and communications technologies. Contacting us: General information: info(a)cdt.org World Wide Web: URL:http://www.cdt.org/ FTP URL:ftp://ftp.cdt.org/pub/cdt/ Snail Mail: The Center for Democracy and Technology 1634 Eye Street NW * Suite 1100 * Washington, DC 20006 (v) +1.202.637.9800 * (f) +1.202.637.0968 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- End Policy Post 3.03 04/30/97 -----------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Crypto gambling
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

It has been brung to my attention that one of the horses running in this Saturday's Kentucky Derby is named Crypto Star. He already won the Louisiana and Arkansas Derbys. Vote Labour!!! --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0