December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

HELLO
by Lou Zer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Is ESDES a good program?

1 0

Re: [No Subject:]
by Lou Zer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sat, 25 Jan 1997 00:30:57 -0800 Bill Stewart <stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com> writes: >Hi! It's useful to include a subject line in email so people >can decide whether to read it and have more context for it, >though calling yourself "fuck you" will probably deter a few people. >There are lots of anarchists on the net; you can run into some good >discussions on Usenet on several newsgroups with "anarchy" or >"anarchism" >in the titles. Rec.caves has good underground material...... You missed the hole point. You read that BECAUSE their was no header, if it was ANARCHY you would have just deleted it.

2 1

Re: your mail
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:54 PM 1/24/97 -0800, tekmasta(a)global.california.com wrote: >can anyone help me out with getting pgp working... I just got 2.6.2 >excutable the freeware one and its for dos... I need to get one that works >with eudora or netscape.... please help! You want PGPMail. A free, full strength, beta is available at http://www.pgp.com/ PGPMail offers single click integration with Eudora. I use it myself. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred Make your mark in the history of mathematics. Use the spare cycles of your PC/PPC/UNIX box to help find a new prime. http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm

1 0

Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
by Toto 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk wrote: > > John Gilmore is free to appoint > whoever he wants to moderate his list, he is free to censor all > messages which criticise him and his censorship, however, subscribers > to the list should be told they are being censored on these grounds > and not on some facade of "crypto relevancy" or another thin veil > drawn weakly over content based censorship to protect a certain class > of list members. It became rather glaringly obvious after moderation was announced that class structure would be the defining feature of moderation. Those who felt themselves to be in the 'upper class' made no bones about it. Toto

1 0

Re: testing email from airport kiosk
by Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bill Stewart <stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com> writes: > An update on the SF airport kiosk email machines: ... > It does support anonymous email, in that you can type in > any email address you want, and it doesn't seem to mind. > In addition to limited web, telnet, and outgoing email, > it lets you retrieve email with POP3. Doesn't seem to be a way > to get it to run a program, though :-) My immediate guess would be that everyone using it gets videotaped, then all activity is logged, and that the LEAs are waiting for some idiot to use it to retrieve kiddie porn and/or terrorist bobm-making instructions. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0

Re: Scandinavian Goverments provide PGP to postal customers...
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:29 PM 1/24/97 -0800, Hugh Daniel wrote: > FYI: >>From: jsp(a)betz.biostr.washington.edu [...] >> However, some hardware is required. Because the key is on a >> smartcard, users must have smartcard readers installed on their >> computers, which aren't yet widely available. But Pdr Andler of >> Finnish Hewlett Packard says that later this year, smartcard readers >> will become standard on computers in Scandinavia. [...] Interesting piece of trivia: I recently talked with a fellow from Intel. They are looking to purchase keyboards with smartcard readers built in. They hope to get them at $30/piece from suppliers in Asia. The lot size? 10 million. That's a lot of smartcard readers. Even for Intel. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred Make your mark in the history of mathematics. Use the spare cycles of your PC/PPC/UNIX box to help find a new prime. http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm

1 0

encrypt_1.html
by Lynx_User＠linux.nycmetro.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Reuters New Media [ Yahoo | Write Us | Search | Info ] [ Index | News | World | Biz | Tech | Politic | Sport | Scoreboard | Entertain | Health ] _________________________________________________________________ Previous Story: Texas Instruments Posts Loss, Stock Soars Next Story: FCC Chief Asks If Policy Should Focus On Internet _________________________________________________________________ Friday January 24 10:08 AM EST US Senator Will Reintroduce Encryption Export Bill WASHINGTON - Sen. Conrad Burns will reintroduce next week his measure to substantially eliminate export restrictions on computer encoding technology, a spokesman for the Senator says. "We are aiming for the 28th (of January) and it will be the same bill as last year," Matt Raymond, spokesman for the Montana Republican, said. President Clinton signed an executive order in November slightly relaxing export controls on encryption technology -- computer programs that use mathematical formulas to scramble information and render it unreadable without a password or software "key." But many in Congress and the computer industry have said the new Clinton policy did not go far enough to lift the Cold War era export limits that classified most encryption programs as munitions. Copyright, Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved _________________________________________________________________ ________________________ ___________ Help _________________________________________________________________ Previous Story: Texas Instruments Posts Loss, Stock Soars Next Story: FCC Chief Asks If Policy Should Focus On Internet _________________________________________________________________ [ Index | News | World | Biz | Tech | Politic | Sport | Scoreboard | Entertain | Health ] _________________________________________________________________ Reuters Limited Questions or Comments

1 0

Re: Anyone have info on foreign "ITARS"
by Greg Taylor 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bill Campbell wrote: >Does anyone have any pointers to info about the import/export >restrictions on encryption products in various countries. I know any >such summary would be very dynamic, but perhaps there's something >out there. The Australian regulations are available at: CUSTOMS (PROHIBITED EXPORTS) REGULATIONS - SCHEDULE 13 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/cer439/sch13.html and: AUSTRALIAN CONTROLS ON THE EXPORT OF DEFENCE AND STRATEGIC GOODS: http://www.adfa.oz.au/DOD/al/iic/excontrl/excohome.htm Crypto software comes under Part 3, Category 5/2 of these regulations. (These documents are in MS Word format) ADFA, for those who are not aware, is the Australian Defence Force Academy, the major tertiary training institute for the defence forces. I have an extract of the key clauses of these regulations if anyone is interested. Briefly, the Australian regulations ban cryptography exports, claiming responsibilities as a party to the Wassenaar Arrangement, although the actual details of the latter regarding crypto seem obscure. However, an export license can be obtained on application to the Defence Ministry. The conditions of such a license are not openly stated, and at least one Australian software company has been refused a license. It would seem that even "public domain" software such as PGP is covered here. Ironically, the international version of PGP is available from the ADFA site at: ftp://ftp.adfa.oz.au/pub/security/pgp263i/ The government attitude to crypto policy generally in Australia is much more relaxed than in the USA. There is a recognition of business and personal need for strong crypto and that a balance needs to be sought between those needs and that of the law enforcement community. Although key escrow has been raised as an issue in some circles, it has not formed part of any government policy as yet. Greg Taylor EFA Crypto Committee

1 0

TEST--FLAMES
by Sandy Sandfort 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, We are still working out the bugs. This message is SUPPOSED to go only to the unedited list and the flames list. If it shows up on the moderated list, we have a bug. I'd like to have a couple of you (Bill Stewart? Lucky Green?) let me know so we can trace down the problem and get it corrected. Thanks, S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

TEST--MODERATED
by Sandy Sandfort 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, We are still working out the bugs. This message is SUPPOSED to go only to the unedited list and the moderated list. If it shows up on the flames list, we have a bug. I'd like to have a couple of you (Toto? Dale Thorn?) let me know so we can trace down the problem and get it corrected. Thanks, S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2 1