December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Wiretaps
by Dana W. Albrecht 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wiretaps Up Sharply in Clinton Administration WASHINGTON (Reuter) - The Clinton administration has sharply increased use of federal telephone wiretaps and other electronic surveillance in the United States since taking office, The Washington Post reported Sunday. ... Civil rights and privacy advocates were upset with the trend but unable to do much about it ... Frederick Ness, who runs the Justice Department office that approves applications for court-ordered wiretaps, told the Post: ``We are up 30 to 40 percent this year.'' In 1992, the last year of the Bush administration, there were 340 federal court orders permitting electronic surveillance in criminal cases, the newspaper said. Quoting unidentified officials, the report said that number had risen to 672 last year and almost certainly would exceed 700 in 1996. The figures did not include ``national security'' wiretap orders, obtained under intelligence legislation, which also had been rising dramatically, the Post said. Preparing for expected continued growth in surveillance of domestic criminals, the Justice Department was buying additional high-tech equipment, developing new eavesdropping techniques and adding support personnel, the report said.

1 0

Quantum Communications
by Derek Bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

By mistake, I sent a message in reply to a list member and forgot to include the list. I also misremembered *Austria* as Australia when I sent my original question to the list. The item I read was a news item on the bottom of p.16, July 6 Issue of _New Scientist_, enititled "It's good to talk in quantum trits". The researchers are Klaus Mattle, Harald Weinfurter and Anton Zeilinger of the University of Innsbruck and Paul Quiat of Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Weinfurter said "It's the first experiment which demonstrates a communications system using pure quantum states". I don't know enough QM to tell if it has the same immunity to eavesdropping as the scheme studied by British Telecom. I'll send more details tomorrow, as I have to leave now. Derek

1 0

Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
by Duncan Frissell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:54 AM 7/12/96 -0700, Eric Murray wrote: >When I called the Pac Bell customer service droids to get my "complete" >blocking I asked them why they won't block CID to 800 numbers. >Their answer: "that's just the way it works". Since they can't bill you for LD numbers you call without reporting the calls on your bill, they can't charge 800 (or pay 900) number owners without reporting which numbers called them. I suppose you could just trust them (like the UK) and not demand a list of numbers you called and then the 800/900 businesses might do the same. Likely? DCF

1 0

Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 03:05 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Will Rodger wrote: >>As I see it, the most important issue is not the legal status of the one >>actually doing the export/mailing, but in fact the organization which is the >>recipient and thus, the beneficiary of this act. _THAT_ organization will >>be well-identified, yet will not have done anything obviously illegal. Is >>there any indication that Baker was trying to distinguish between the one >>physically mailing it, and those receiving it? > >Yup. He was speaking only of the US company. Any indication about what the USG might be able to do, SPECIFICALLY, legally or in retaliation? Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

1 0

Re: ADD and Unix, + Ritalin Questions
by E. ALLEN SMITH 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: IN%"ichudov(a)algebra.com" 10-JUL-1996 03:56:31.76 >3. Are there any long term effects from Ritalin, and can it >be discontinued easily? Well, the FDA seems to think it's addictive... my experience with it (off on weekends, evenings, and in the summer) would appear to say otherwise. There is some appetite suppression, which allegedly may lead to growth suppression, but I have some doubt about this (I'm over 6'1"). -Allen

1 0

Re: Destabilizing China's Government with Strong Crypto
by Arun Mehta 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:01 12/07/96 +0000, Deranged Mutant wrote: >On 12 Jul 96 at 9:40, Arun Mehta wrote: >[..] >BTW, similar problems in Iran fro what I've heard. I remember >hearing a blurb that VOA Chinese Programs explained how to make a >setellite dish out of aluminum foil, so pick up special VOA >boradcasts I'm sure... (That's rather intersting, because you can >crumple it up or wrap leftovers in it immediately.) Is there a good hacker handbook, telling you how you can do things your government won't let you, something along the lines of a modern-day Abbie Hoffman "Steal This Book"? <grin, salivate> >I'm told by some friends that the Chinese, in large part due to the >writing system, prefer FAXs over the internet. That's something to >keep in mind. > >Hm... interesting project: a graphics program that works with PGP or >PGPlib. One can import scanned images or draw onto the screen and >then encrypt it for mailing. Excellent project. One reason that e-mail is picking up in popularity is that sending a fax to the office address is like sending a postcard. >> 1) Collect the e-mail addresses as Allen suggested (including those in >> Hongkong), and send them a single, short message offering to teach them free >> of cost how to use pgp and all the goodies at >> http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm/cbsw.html > >Might be condescending. 'Civilized white man brings PGP to the >barbarians...' Look around you: while "civilized", "white" and "man" might characterize the vast (?) majority on this list, I'm sure that's not the universe on cypherpunks. And how does it matter? I'm suggesting an e-mail course that people may subscribe to if they wish. I'm currently attending a course on Cyberspace-Law for Non-Lawyers, presented by the Cyberspace Law Institute and Counsel Connect with thousands of others <http://www.counsel.com/cyberspace> -- I'm sure there are people from all continents on that course, and the question of it being condescending hasn't arisen. > They may well know about PGP, but not in a position >to make that knowledge widely known. That's no good to the rest of the world. Forget them: the question is, are *you* in a position to share your knowledge? >And if I were in a 'totalitarian' or restrictive country I'd be damn suspicious, >maybe frightened by this ('are the secret police setting me up?' or 'will the >notice if I reply?'). Maybe lesson 1could be on how to use an encrypting anonymous remailer, and those who succeed get lesson 2 onwards untraceably. If they are suspicious, they don't have to join or can unsubscribe. >What if that person like the way their country is? They >could inform the local authorities and set in motion a crackdown that >would not have happened, perhaps. We say *nothing* during the course about what we feel about the political situation in Singapore, the work situation in multinationals or Bill Clinton. We restrict the course to a sharing of knowledge on crypto in the Internet spirit of a free economy. >I'd leave the specifics to activists who are already familiar with >the respective cultures, societies, politics, etc.... I'm one. Be glad to tell you more,... >chances are they >are already doing things along those lines. If they are, its only in pockets, and they are doing an awful job of telling people about it if none of us has heard. The Internet is still very new here, most people don't know much about it except how to click the porn bookmarks. >Otherwise, if you don't >know what you're doing, you can unintentionally mess up somebody >else's life, if not your own. It's only crypto, not the Bible or Koran. And let them be their own judges? You seem to want to protect people in the Third World the way the US government wants to keep cyberporn from kids. From: tcmay(a)got.net (Timothy C. May) Subject: Destabilizing China's Government with Strong Crypto Sender: owner-cypherpunks(a)toad.com >At 4:40 AM 7/12/96, Arun Mehta wrote: ... >>2) Encourage the production of simple, cheap devices such as a PGP phone <cited material snipped> >>3) Find people who beam radio transmissions into China (Rupert Murdoch via >>his Star TV satellite is one ;-) and ask them to devote an "Internet hour" <cited material snipped> >Good ideas, all. And deploying steganography is a natural fit to this situation. Thanks, mate. What's the use of all the theory you develop and software you'll write if it is inaccessible to those who need it most? Just think: you work in a sensitive job, have a bad conscience about all the forests that are being cut on account of collusion between the Forest Department and the illegal loggers -- now you can maybe talk to someone about the weather or the greatness of Kim Jong Il, and in the process upload all you know about the scandal, untraceable to you. From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger(a)pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu> >: 1) Collect the e-mail addresses as Allen suggested (including those in >: Hongkong), and send them a single, short message offering to teach them free >: of cost how to use pgp and all the goodies at >: http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm/cbsw.html > >Unfortunately for those of us in the United States or who are >otherwise subject to its jurisdiction such an offer would require a >license or a waiver of jurisdiction under the International Traffic in >Arms Regulations before it could safely be carried out. That >particular highly worthwhile project would seem to fall under the >definition of performing defense services as well as involving the >disclosure of technical data relating to an item on the United States >Munitions List. Did you let that stop you in the past? Suppose the course were conducted from outside the US? The packages can in any case be downloaded legally from outside. I'm sure there is no law against your telling me how to use a particular software package? Anonymously, if you must? What I have in mind is as follows: "Building a Cryptobook" lists a number of software packages: SecureDrive PGP Private Idaho PGPfone Wipe Utilities S-Tools Joel provides also the configuration steps needed to get it all working, which is an excellent starting point. Suppose we do an e-mail course telling people in simple language *why* they need this, what benefits they would get as a result, how to download (idiot-proof instructions all through), and how to set up *for basic, minimum security*. I'm sure the software packages will have all sorts of bells and whistles that the novice doesn't need, not right away. Maybe some or all of this instructional material is already available. Could we pick up a set that is easy to understand and concise? That could be packaged together as a course or a book, a sort-of "Crypto for Dummies." Would people like to select individual software packages, and put the material together? Everyone gets due credit, of course. Think for a moment: Just as Nelson Mandela stood today at the corner of Trafalgar Square in front of South Africa House, where I'm sure many of us have shouted ,"Free Nelson Mandela!", some day soon we might get similar thanks from some Chinese or heavens knows whom... >From: Alan Olsen <alano(a)teleport.com> >Another thing to do is get more web sites containing information of interest >to people living in such regimes on SSL enabled web servers. This, and the encrypted fax would help greatly. I'm sure others have good ideas too. Please send them. How does one go about facilitiating their implementation? Arun Mehta Phone +91-11-6841172, 6849103 amehta(a)cpsr.org http://mahavir.doe.ernet.in/~pinaward/arun.htm The protestors of Tiananmen Square will be back. Next time, the battle will be fought in cyberspace, where the students have the more powerful tanks...

2 1

Re: "White 'Punks on Dope" (w apologies to The Tubes)
by mike＠fionn.lbl.gov 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Jul 11, 11:15pm, snow wrote: > > man is just ridiculous, & betrays the author's lack of knowledge. > > No, the POINT IS MIS-DIAGNOSIS. Children who are either brighter > than their classmates and figured out the assignement with in minutes These are not the people who are being talked about here > of the teacher giving it, or children with _no_ boundries implemented > by their parents (people are like fractals, very subject to initial > conditions) hence they keep pushing and pushing so the parents respond > by instituting chemical control. Well, like I said earlier, in the old days very hyperactive boys probably did have the tar whipped out of them. This does work, for short periods. In the long run, it's ineffective. Totally ineffective for a medical condition. Do you think, for example, that it is effective to tell a person suffering from depression to "cheer up", or someone suffering from some forms of schizophrenia to "ignore the voices & stop acting silly"? No amount of your cajoling is going to get a person with a heart deficiency up El Capitan, & there's no chance you can guilt trip someone with severe emphysema to run a marathon with you. I'm sure there's plenty of misdiagnoses, but unless you're willing to lay your md or your epidemiological credentials on the table, I'm not giving you any credit. Your argument sounds like some kind of reactionary victorian moralizing to me (parents setting boundaries .... sheesh).

1 0

Re: FW: [RANT] Giving Mind Control Drugs to Children
by E. ALLEN SMITH 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: IN%"blancw(a)accessone.com" "blanc" 10-JUL-1996 06:04:36.86 > As Tim said, the selective application of drugs or persecution = >regarding their use points to a great hypocrisy (and deterioration of = >character), and the more widespread the acceptance of hypocritical = >double-standards, the higher the rate-o-meter goes up in favor of = >statism. At the very least, all the confusion surrounding drug use will = >create "disrespect for Authority" (which in turn will inspire statists = >to propose further crack-downs, pardon the pun, on "criminals"). Actually, my Ritalin was one of the things that led me to come to the conclusion that drug laws were nonsense. It's a Schedule II drug that I never felt _any_ addiction to; I was off it on evenings, weekends, and during holidays. So at least in my case it had a pro-libertarian effect. > It makes me think of those Communist countries (remember them?) where = >political dissenters were been labelled insane - the protesters were the = >ones identified as having the problems, not the State. The imprisoned = >troublemakers were then drugged, thus taking care of their "irrational" = >behavior and lack of appreciation. The matter is that Ritalin isn't acting as a mind control pill, or whatever the hysterics are claiming. Indeed, I nominate it as one of the more transhumanist drugs I know of (for adults with ADHD and children), and I've done somewhat of a study of the subject. -Allen

1 0

asking for beeing in your mailing list
by Victor M. Hernandez 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I would ask for being include in your mailing list How can I do that? thanks in advance -- //// ~O¿O~ pgjeags(a)infosel.net.mx

1 0

Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts? (fwd)
by gimonca＠skypoint.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: David Mazieres <dm(a)amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> > To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Subject: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts? > > My last phone bill said that Nynex is now giving out people's names in > addidtion to their phone numbers over caller-id. I therefore called > Nynex and told them to block caller-id on my phone line. > > They said no problem, but... They said nothing I can do will block it > when I call 800 numbers. "The people with 800 numbers have special > software, and there is nothing you can do to block your identity when > calling them. Not even *67." > > Wow. Maybe I'm not paranoid enough, but I never expected this. I can > never again call an 800 number anonymously to get information about > something unless I go out to a pay phone. What an incredible > inconvenience, and how truly depressing. > This has been true for years. On 800 numbers, the receiver gets ANI, not CID. Check newsgroups like alt.dcom.telecom, comp.dcom.telecom, etc.: there's always somebody talking about CID and ANI. In the back of my mind, I remember hearing about an anonymizer for 800-number calls. Maybe at WilTel. Check the search engine of your choice. Personally, I like Caller ID, because it gives individuals a service that formerly only governments and corporations could get. --gimonca(a)skypoint.com

1 0