December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Guess what I found...
by Ian Goldberg 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Guess what I found in my mailbox this morning: A cheque (that's check for those Americans out there) for $500 from Netscape Comm. Corp. It seems they decided to split a "Bugs Bounty" prize between Dave and me retroactively for the PRNG thing. :-) - Ian "This may turn out to be a good day..."

1 0

Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
by jpb＠miamisci.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:50 PM 1/23/96, you wrote: >The problem is whether you can separate the functionality of what you're >exporting sufficiently from what you're contracting out that the exported >material isn't a "component of a cryptosystem"; it's tough to do a good bones >version of code if you're concerned about satisfying both the letter and >spirit of a law to avoid hassles with the government. On the other hand, >if you're as big as IBM or even MIT, sometimes you can do it.... So move 100% of the development overseas. Pick someplace where the labor is cheaper (maybe the former Soviet Union, but I don't know what their crypto export laws are like) and develop 100% of the product overseas. Put a notice inside each shrink-wrapped box that "This product was forced to be written overseas, costing American programmers their jobs, by the shortsightedness of Congress." 2048bit-Fingerprint: F8 A2 A5 15 56 42 9B 16 3F BD 57 0F 8A ED E3 21 No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.

2 1

re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting
by jrochkin＠cs.oberlin.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:13 PM 01/23/96, Bruce Baugh wrote: >The nym signing is an idle thought of mine. I have a nym key which is, at >the moment, signed only by itself. I know friends of mine have nym accounts. >if we could assemble a group of folks whom I can trust enough to link the >nym and myself, it'd be nice to add some more signatures to the nym key, and >vice versa. I don't understand--what would signatures on a nym's key be good for? If I sign your key named "Bruce Baugh", I'm basically saying that I feel confident that this key really _does_ belong to Bruce Baugh. Others see my signature, and say "Jonathan, he's a groovy guy, if he feels confident that this belons to Bruce, well, he's probably gotten the fingerprint directly from Bruce in person, and I'm happy to use this key to send mail to Bruce." If, on the other hand, I sign "Toxic Avenger"'s key, then what benefit is this for third parties? Since Toxic Avenger is, by intention, _not_ linked to a real person, I'm not saying that I feel confident that this key really belongs to any particular real person. What am I saying?

3 2

Rutgers symposium on Copyright and NII 14-15 Feb 96
by Steven C. Perkins 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Please forward as appropriate. Conference Program will be at "http://www.rutgers.edu/RUSLN/copyconf.html" this weekend. Roundtable Conference: Copyright Issues and the National Information Infrastructure Rutgers School of Law - Newark February 14-15, 1996 Rutgers School of Law - Newark is hosting an important conference dealing with major issues presented by the White Paper and electronic distribution of information products. Three roundtable sessions will engage 40-50 leading scholars, lawyers, corporate counsel, and government officials in a day-long discussion and debate of critical law and policy issues. The scheduling of this conference anticipates further policy debates and congressional hearings on pending proposals. It will join leading actors in an in-depth exploration of core issues through an exchange that identifies and addresses a diversity of interests and searches for greater mutual understanding and expansion of areas of agreement. Registration fee: $125 Registration deadline: February 10, 1996 (Walk-in registration permitted beginning at 8:30 AM.) Rutgers School of Law - Newark 15 Washington Street Newark, NJ 07102-3192 Attn: Assistant Dean Margaret C. Bridge For further information, call Assistant Dean Margaret C. Bridge at (201) 648-5094, or send email to Professor David A. Rice at drice(a)world.std.com. ------------------------------------------------------------- **********||||||||||\\\\\\\\\\*//////////||||||||||********** Steven C. Perkins sperkins(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu User Services Coordinator Ackerson Law Library http://www.rutgers.edu/lawschool.html Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, School of Law at Newark http://www.rutgers.edu/RUSLN/rulnindx.html VOX: 201-648-5965 FAX: 201-648-1356 |||||||||||||||\\\\\\\\\\\\\||*||///////////////|||||||||||||||

1 0

Re: Hack Java
by frantz＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 9:47 1/24/96 +0100, Christian Wettergren wrote: >(In my darker moments, I feel that the whole field of computer security >is in a major crisis. Ever heard of the Emperor's New Clothes? ;-)) We reduce the problem of an infected Java Interpreter to the previously unsolved problem of virus protection in general. I think it is possible to build highly virus resistant systems, but the cost in user retraining will be huge. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting (408)356-8506 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz(a)netcom.com Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

1 0

Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
by frantz＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 10:28 1/24/96 -0800, Lucky Green wrote: >I agree. The reason for enforcing ITAR is to keep good crypto of the >*domestic* market. If ITAR no longer accomplishes that, new laws will be >passed. I think this is likely to be an oversimplification. While there are probably a number of people in e.g. FBI, DEA, DOJ who want to restrict domestic crypto, I suspect there are also a number of people in e.g. NSA who are sincerly interested in using SIGINT to protect the US from foreign threats and want strong domestic crypto as part of that protection. As always, public policy is a compromise between competing interests (INSIDE the beltway). However, the current policy is a holdover from the days when strong crypto was a closely held trade secret. Since this assumption is no longer true, the policy becomes more and more disfunctional every day. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting (408)356-8506 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz(a)netcom.com Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

1 0

disk randomness
by Donald T. Davis 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

rich salz posted to this list a message i sent him about a portable way to gather disk-noise for a true rng. he also was kind enough to forward a reply to me from the list, because i wasn't subscribed at the time. the reply's author pointed out that my approach is not a practical one, and that NOISE.SYS gathers disk timings and other noise more efficiently, anyway. now that i'm subscribed, i'll answer on my own behalf: i agree that my algorithm isn't practical. in fact, that's why i agreed to rich's request that i let him post my message here. i don't recommend paging-timings to my clients, because it's not a workable approach for production-quality code. memory-paging's only virtue as a noise-source is that it's uniquely portable. i failed to emphasize this, in the message rich forwarded for me. the code needs no device-specific calls, and the only OS-specific call is the gettime() call. even with this virtue, i don't recommend it as a production-quality algorithm, unless the process that needs the rng is already memory-bound. i'm sorry that my original msg was unclear on this point; that's my fault, not rich's. by the way, i think the "interesting work" of mine to which rich referred, is my paper on disk randomness, which appeared in the crypto '94 proceedings. it presents work i did at mit from '88-9, and shows mathematically why disk-timings can contain true entropy: a disk's speed variations come from air turbulence, which now is known mathematically to be unpredictable in the long run. my coauthors were p.r. fenstermacher, a chaos-theory physicist, and r. ihaka, a statistician. -don davis, boston

1 0

Re: NSA says strong crypto to china??
by E. ALLEN SMITH 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: IN%"perry(a)piermont.com" 9-JAN-1996 12:05:32.69 Alex Strasheim writes: > If this is true, it's great news. It would mean that the NSA is adopting > both cypherpunk analysis and tactics. Who would have thought? An NSA > remade in Tim May's image. I suspect that the NSA was thinking in our terms long before many of us were aware of cryptography. I actually think that in many cases, their behavior is perfectly rational. Their goals are merely different. If you are in SIGINT, I believe that the possibility of totally losing a valued intelligence tool must heavily weigh on your mind. Of course, they are hardly monolithic, and different groups at the NSA necessarily have different goals. Once SIGINT becomes much harder regardless of their previous attempts to stop it, I suspect that the NSA will become a friend and not an impediment. By that time, of course, the "we have to protect our people" types will be the only ones producing results and getting funding, and the "we have to gather information" types will have long ceased to produce. Thats probably a decade or more off, though. --------------- I suspect that the NSA can basically be divided into four groups: A. Those who are interested in protecting American individual liberties, and are thus (possibly potential) allies. This bunch may have a subgroup of those who already are allies, who have unfortunately been rather unsuccessful (or perhaps we simply haven't seen their successes). B. Those who realize about the potentials for individual liberty from cryptography, but believe that something else about America is more important. For instance, they may believe that the voters in a democracy should be able to institute whatever rules they like. Various left- and right-wing viewpoints are also possible here; the former would include worrying about lost tax dollars because of wanting big government, the latter would include concerns about pornography, etcetera. C. Those who are in the NSA because they want power, and strong cryptography's dissemination would hinder this. This group is likely to be concealed as one of the other groups. D. Those who haven't thought about it, and are simply following orders. I suspect that this is the largest group; while the overall level of intellect at the NSA may be higher than in the average population, the intelligence mindset of "need to know" may be keeping many people from realizing everything the NSA is doing. -Allen

1 0

None
by Mr. Nobody 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In article <9601241720.AB13251(a)envirolink.org> Daniel Miskell <DMiskell(a)envirolink.org> writes: > Mr. Nobody writes: Dr. Nobody, to you. > >In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.960123192018.1008D-100000(a)zifi.genetics.utah.edu> > >zinc <zinc(a)zifi.genetics.utah.edu> writes: > >> i got this in the mail this morning. here's another blatant case > >> of illegal export. names and exact addresses removed to protect the > >> clueless. > > > >Why exactly did you post this message? I personally don't mind, but > >am just curious. > > Why exactly did YOU post this message? I personally dont mind, but am just > curious. I thought it was pretty clear from my message: curiosity.

1 0

Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
by Andrew Loewenstern 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> I can see two practical ways to build a netscape product outside > the US. The first is to export the source code for the Navigator > with the crypto code removed. All of the calls to crypto would > have to be removed as well. I've heard some people claim that the > government could come after us on the grounds that we were taking > part in a conspiracy to export strong crypto. Why not just print out all of the source code to Navigator (crypto and all) in a nice OCR font? Paper is exportable. Then you would 'only' have to scan it back in and debug it. andrew

1 0