December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Meet-in-the-middle attack
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timmy C[retin] May is just a poor excuse for an unschooled, retarded thug. (((> /< ( / ((({{{{{:< Timmy C[retin] May \ \<

4 3

Re: 35,000,000 People...
by staff＠mailcorporation.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Would you be interested in... * Sending out Bulk Email for FREE? * Receiving 35,000,000 Email Addresses FREE of charge? * Sending out Bulk Email using your CURRENT Internet Account without EVER having to worry about it being canceled? * Sending out a FREE Bulk Email Advertisement for your Business or Web Page to over 250,000 people per day? * Posting a FREE Advertisement for your Business or Web Page to over 25,000 Newsgroups in under 3 Hours? You may shudder at the thought of Bulk Email.. but the simple truth is.. BULK EMAIL WORKS! By sending out Bulk Email, you are reaching up to 250,000 people per day for FREE with an unlimited length advertisement for your business or web page! To find out how to do all of this and more for FREE, email our autoresponder at: free(a)nim.com You MUST Place the word "FREE" in the Subject Line so our autoresponder mailbot can send you this FREE Information! To be removed from our mailing list, email our autoremover at: remove(a)nim.com You MUST Place the word "REMOVE" in the Subject Line so our autoremover mailbot can remove you from our mailing list.

1 0

Re: You really do want to volunteer, don't you? (fwd)
by Tim May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 4:05 PM -0700 9/2/97, Greg Broiles wrote: >A more useful way to avoid corrections/citations/clarifications might be >simply getting the details correct in the first place. > And a hearty fuck you to you as well. Jeesh. You'll probably make a fine lawyer. There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws. Only one response to the key grabbers is warranted: "Death to Tyrants!" ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

2 1

RC2,RC4,CDMF algorithm
by nobuki nakatuji 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Does anybody know RC2,RC4,CDMF algorithm? If you know these algorithm, Please show me these algorithm. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

Re: Information
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/2/97 9:28 PM, Jonathan Wienke (JonWienk(a)ix.netcom.com) passed this wisdom: >What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall >not be infringed" is too hard to understand? (From 2nd Amendment, >U.S. Constitution) > >When everyone is armed, criminals fear everyone, not just >the police. Just curious, where did you ever get the idea that criminals fear the police? The way our system works these days, the police are hardly more than an annoyance and inconvenience (unless of course an NYC cop asks if you want to go to the bathroom!) rather than to be feared. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNAzcg8dZgC62U/gIEQLHxgCfTSfMBGA7bf4jWPQD4ATa6Gn2AEEAmgMV QvRO7Ta6RadyVeNYqdnx6+vw =VoET -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys - Send Email Subject "Get PGP Key" "When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." -- Mark Twain

2 1

Re: NSA/NIST Security Lab
by Uran233＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Yes but the NSA really wanted the Skipjack for DOD messsages. They (probably) monitor all of those anyway. But Matt did alot of work on his project but did he show how to brak Skipjack and does this totally trash the Fortezza program? I being niaive would not belive that the NSA would let the process continue if it was unsecure, of cousre if they can read all the messages and are sure that others can not. Maybe it is secure except for NSA. But does that mean it is not a good algorithm? DES stood around for a long time, in the public sense. But no one knos if there is a trapdoor. Of course I may be all wrong her but it is a thouhht

1 0

Re: Missing Kids and Porn Links
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > > Most of people who publicly "care for children" are hidden pedophiles or > control freaks, in my humble opinion. I agree. Does anyone have any pointers to child pornography sites, so that I can warn people which sites to avoid? T.C. Mayonnaise <tm(a)dhp.com> "Hey little girl, want to make some mayonnaise with _real_ eggs?"

2 1

Diana on a stick
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Rumor has it that Princess Diana will be put on a barbeque-style spit in her coffin, so that when the Buckingham Palace spin doctors are done with her, she will be able to roll over in her grave at a high rate of speed. Dr. Roberts ~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Re: Death Pictures of Diana on InterNet!!!
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 09:43 PM 9/2/97 EDT, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote: >Mike Duvos <enoch(a)zipcon.net> writes: > >> Now that pictures of Princess Diana trapped in the wreckage have been >> printed in European tabloids, it is only a matter of time before someone >> scans them and posts them to alt.binaries.pictures.tasteless. >> >> Clicking on such pictures, of course, is not the moral equivalent of >> having personally run Princess Diana off the road, regardless of what your >> neighborhood CPAC member would like you to believe. > >This is off-topic, but... Why do people refer to the bastards who ran >Di's card off the road by some weird italian name? In a case of Worst Timing Ever by an advertiser, Weight Watchers flyers hit the mailboxes in our area on Friday. They feature a cheesecake shot of Lady Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, saying that losing weight is: "HARDER than outrunning the papparazzi" I guess fat people are doomed.

1 0

Re: Adding Memory to the Net
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is an interesting proposal. It would be easier for people who are new to this business if there were more specifics about how this would be implemented. I'm sure you have particular techniques in mind for splitting the data across servers, etc., but everybody else doesn't necessarily know what they are. Examples are nice because you can go over them one bit at a time. Here are some ignorant comments and questions. Mike Duvos wrote: > Bob makes a secure connection to a Trusted Agent doing business... Why is the Trusted Agent necessary? What does the agent do that Bob couldn't do himself? It seems like Bob could split up the data and pay the servers to hold it just as well as the agent. And he wouldn't have to trust anybody. > For the next 100 days, Bob and all of his friends may use the 256 > bit TAG/CONTEXT pair in place of Bob's data and may serve that data > for free any number of times off any network file system server. Or the people getting the data could also pay small fee for good service. Like a tip, if storing the data itself is the dominant cost. This makes it harder to attack the servers by saturating them with requests for data. Usenet has traditionally been free for posters. This model could continue if there were users who were willing to pay to see other people's posts. Servers would keep the data around so long as there seemed to be people asking for it. You could imagine the price going up over time as fewer people want to see it. At some point not enough people may want to pay as much money so it goes away. In this model the server operators would just be information speculators. And, if The Bad Guys started knocking out servers, there would be a powerful financial incentive to start serving the information that was eliminated since its market price should go up. > After 100 days, bob may fork over another 10 cents for another 100 > days, or his data will disappear. The TAG assigned to an Octet > String is unique, and no two strings have the same TAG, and no > string is ever assigned multiple tags, no matter how often it may be > entered and purged from the system. It would be nice if the ten cents sells a promise by the server to make the data available for some period of time in a way which is independently auditable. If the server stops carrying the data, Bob can publish his proof that he was defrauded. Because the facts would not be in doubt, it would be unlikely to happen frequently. > Users could boot their machines off the Network, and instantly see > gigabytes of software available to them. After syncing their cache > file system with the network, they could drop their PC off the roof, > buy another one, and by typing in just one TAG/CONTEXT pair, see all > their files again. This is very cool. You can hide 256 bits pretty easily, which makes The Great Satan's job harder. > Aside from replication done for reliability, there should be only > one copy of a file in the system at any time. If multiple users > submit the same file, there should be no more copies than if one > user submitted it. Would this really be worth the effort? If Bob wants to pay to put the file up twice, why not let just let him? Just Another Cypherpunk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNAuAZv+1rw4IkyBFAQG3WQf9EBR/peMkdc+0WT5W6O+L9KMf69artRy9 Fg8kCObbHlYEn/rCd0DRJ+Hd9YLfBz8aeo7YqaU3Lawe9+WW5hH0HbSYZe6vXeBN M5VKW4HJpcY4zapc1DCdCPW72KnWZjlrOsP3X+r1yi1KrLlsORNkl3M85dhS5vLz YRoZIIZE51vmrnV3mCA0dClljP2+e4c7FmxtO36spi7n/PPVwkP7xtHqsy762Ex/ iyxyRXCWnPMFHy0tJRWi25HeGqC2IRg22zQ5zk36c6z/JPS92Yabix/rnVWcazP4 3OnmT+nF3xy3mtdx9eMbPTBvxY28uOq+q2k/0/KjNmDjVRPRl2mlvw== =quQD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0