December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

No Subject
by nobuki nakatuji 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

"Smack" the lawyer of your choice...but smack!
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GEORGE D. HARDY Assistant U.S. Attorney 4. I have been advised by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that the public release of the identity of the two victims could cause serious financial and security difficulties for the victims. Until now, the victims have been identified only to the defense, as part of the criminal discovery in the case. Silly me, I thought the people who had their credit card information exposed were the victims. 5. The difficulties facing these victims include the probability that additional hackers will seek to challenge these computer systems, once the defendant's successful efforts are revealed; and the loss of business due to the perception by others ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that computer systems may be vulnerable. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Uh... Excuse me, Dude, but I believe that's how life works. Unless, of course, the government steps in to cover up the facts to the benefit of rich corporations and to the detriment of their gullible customers. 8. The defendant's counsel was contacted regarding this motion. She expressed a willingness to agree to it, but only if the government agreed to limit in some way the government's appropriate public release of the defendant's guilty pleas as a deterrent to others. Such an arrangement was not acceptable to the government. Defendant's counsel therefore indicated that she would like to file an opposition to this motion; but would agree that pending the resolution of this issue, that the identities of the victims could be protected. The cunt sold her client down the river for a good tee time with the prosecutor at a private golf course. Put her in charge of defending Terry McNicols. "Smak" delivered an encrypted CD containing over 100,000 stolen credit card numbers. After the validity of the credit card information was confirmed through decryption of the data on the CD, "Smak" was taken into custody by the FBI. And the 100,000 people were immediately notified that their credit cards had been compromised? I fucking doubt it. Better to screw over 100,000 citizen-units than expose the incompetence of a few companies and the government's fight against strong encryption and computer security. ShitMonger

3 2

THANKS!!!!! A BUNCH!!!!!
by ahoier＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I think somebody on this list (I think on this list) gave me a PGP Signature and I just wanna say thank you so much!!!! But what i'd like to know is what does the PGP Signature really mean????? Like for example what does my PGP Signature mean Alls it is is a bunch of letters. Could someone privately e-mail me some info on cryptography web sites?????? THANKS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 MessageID: HyRMcbGm8DN7BxUVL/6EunpyDLmTX8Wj iQA/AwUBNAneIl7MfpC8gEO7EQIOIgCeM6giFdXXS1Idut3q941mSEEc8CAAoITk 142XgrvDAUe3CMwH4jTRiJZi =jvrj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

PGP Signatures
by ahoier＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Does anyone know where I can get a PGP Signature on the Net. I usually just read the mailing lists posts BTW I think this is my first Post on this list. I'm a begginer to Cryptography and when I heard about it sounded like a cool subject and it is!!!!! I f somebody could please e-mail me some more info on crypto and PGP Signatures. I would really appreciate it. ADAM HOIER Adam Hoier E-MAIL ME AT: ahoier(a)juno.com Life is like a big box of Chocolates :Forrest Gump

7 8

Crypto FAQs
by Dave K-P 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Someone wrote: > Dose Cypherpunks have an FAQ? and dose it need one? There is a "cypherpunk FAQ", but you'd be better off reading the sci.crypt FAQs first. Consult your favorite search engine for locations.

1 0

International Relations
by Dave K-P 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

"[I]t seems pretty clear that no civilized people will ever again permit its government to enter into a competitive armament race." -- Nicholas Murray Butler (President of Columbia University), quoted in the Literary Digest, October 17, 1914

1 0

Adding Memory to the Net
by Mike Duvos 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

A few people have commented on my "Distributed Network Cache Service" suggestion since I posted it, and I would like to respond to their comments. The basic idea here is to add memory to the Net in a reliable way, so that the Net provides memory services in the way it now universally provides data transport services. The Net would then serve compressed encrypted Octet Strings to machines connected to it, and provide a consistant view of which Octet Strings were available at any point in time which was independent of the access point. Adding Octet Strings to the universe of available ones, with a specified lifetime, would involve a micropayment. Computers connected to the Net could then employ either Octet Strings or fixed length data consisting of a cryptographic hash and decryption key to describe any chunk of data, which would reduce the storage requirements of hosts accordingly. Replication and synchronization of data would be the responsiblity of the totality of machines providing the cache service, and would augment the storage capacity of ordinary hosts which often replicate data excessively and synchronize it poorly. As Lucky Green correctly points out, since the cache service would effectively serve prepared digital coccoons whose contents were not visible to it, protocols would be needed to ensure that data was not spoofed. However, this is a "who do cache servers trust to give them data" issue, and not a "how do we serve the data and provide a Network-wide consistant view of the database" issue. Such a system, implemented efficiently, could carry the Eternity service, reliable network news, and serve as a distribution point for all freeware. It could have terabytes of storage, using a fraction of the resources now consumed by the endlessly replicated news spools of hosts on the Net. It would be as uncensorable as Usenet, and survive the destruction or compromise of a large number of cache servers in the system. It would be reliable, and no ones data would be visible to anyone else. I think such a service is the "World File System" reduced to its most basic principles, upon which endless other useful services may be based. Comments? -- Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $ enoch(a)zipcon.com $ via Finger $ {Free Cypherpunk Political Prisoner Jim Bell}

2 1

List of reliable remailers
by Raph Levien 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I operate a remailer pinging service which collects detailed information about remailer features and reliability. To use it, just finger remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu There is also a Web version of the same information, plus lots of interesting links to remailer-related resources, at: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/remailer-list.html This information is used by premail, a remailer chaining and PGP encrypting client for outgoing mail. For more information, see: http://www.c2.org/~raph/premail.html For the PGP public keys of the remailers, finger pgpkeys(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu This is the current info: REMAILER LIST This is an automatically generated listing of remailers. The first part of the listing shows the remailers along with configuration options and special features for each of the remailers. The second part shows the 12-day history, and average latency and uptime for each remailer. You can also get this list by fingering remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu. $remailer{'cyber'} = '<alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net> alpha pgp'; $remailer{"mix"} = "<mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek ksub reord ?"; $remailer{"replay"} = "<remailer(a)replay.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut post ek"; $remailer{"jam"} = "<remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek"; $remailer{"winsock"} = "<winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub reord ?"; $remailer{'nym'} = '<config(a)nym.alias.net> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"squirrel"} = "<mix(a)squirrel.owl.de> cpunk mix pgp pgponly hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{'weasel'} = '<config(a)weasel.owl.de> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"reno"} = "<middleman(a)cyberpass.net> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek reord ?"; $remailer{"cracker"} = "<remailer(a)anon.efga.org> cpunk mix remix pgp hash ksub esub latent cut ek reord post"; $remailer{'redneck'} = '<config(a)anon.efga.org> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"bureau42"} = "<remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org> cpunk mix pgp ksub hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{"neva"} = "<remailer(a)neva.org> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub ?"; $remailer{"lcs"} = "<mix(a)anon.lcs.mit.edu> mix"; $remailer{"medusa"} = "<medusa(a)weasel.owl.de> mix middle" $remailer{"McCain"} = "<mccain(a)notatla.demon.co.uk> mix middle"; $remailer{"valdeez"} = "<valdeez(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"arrid"} = "<arrid(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"hera"} = "<goddesshera(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"htuttle"} = "<h_tuttle(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp hash latent cut post ek"; catalyst(a)netcom.com is _not_ a remailer. lmccarth(a)ducie.cs.umass.edu is _not_ a remailer. usura(a)replay.com is _not_ a remailer. remailer(a)crynwr.com is _not_ a remailer. There is no remailer at relay.com. Groups of remailers sharing a machine or operator: (cyber mix reno winsock) (weasel squirrel medusa) (cracker redneck) (nym lcs) (valdeez arrid hera) The remailer list here has been out of date for some time, but should be up to date now. I'm still working on updating the web page. Last update: Mon 1 Sep 97 6:49:30 PDT remailer email address history latency uptime ----------------------------------------------------------------------- mix mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com +++++++**+*+ 18:43 99.99% weasel config(a)weasel.owl.de --+++-++++- 1:36:13 99.95% bureau42 remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org -------..--- 5:27:26 99.94% nym config(a)nym.alias.net +#+###* #### 1:28 99.82% cyber alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net +**++* *+*** 11:22 99.68% winsock winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net ---+..----- 6:54:29 99.64% neva remailer(a)neva.org ** +#*+-+*#+ 17:59 99.55% squirrel mix(a)squirrel.owl.de ------_---- 3:56:24 99.35% reno middleman(a)cyberpass.net + +- -+++..+ 4:18:57 99.02% hera goddesshera(a)juno.com ---.------- 8:07:05 98.39% arrid arrid(a)juno.com ----+ --- - 5:23:18 96.51% redneck config(a)anon.efga.org #*#+*#* - 36:25 95.93% cracker remailer(a)anon.efga.org ++++++++ 38:21 90.88% jam remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca ++++++++ 51:19 88.75% replay remailer(a)replay.com +** +*** 11:21 88.18% valdeez valdeez(a)juno.com -------- 7:02:22 63.69% History key * # response in less than 5 minutes. * * response in less than 1 hour. * + response in less than 4 hours. * - response in less than 24 hours. * . response in more than 1 day. * _ response came back too late (more than 2 days). cpunk A major class of remailers. Supports Request-Remailing-To: field. eric A variant of the cpunk style. Uses Anon-Send-To: instead. penet The third class of remailers (at least for right now). Uses X-Anon-To: in the header. pgp Remailer supports encryption with PGP. A period after the keyword means that the short name, rather than the full email address, should be used as the encryption key ID. hash Supports ## pasting, so anything can be put into the headers of outgoing messages. ksub Remailer always kills subject header, even in non-pgp mode. nsub Remailer always preserves subject header, even in pgp mode. latent Supports Matt Ghio's Latent-Time: option. cut Supports Matt Ghio's Cutmarks: option. post Post to Usenet using Post-To: or Anon-Post-To: header. ek Encrypt responses in reply blocks using Encrypt-Key: header. special Accepts only pgp encrypted messages. mix Can accept messages in Mixmaster format. reord Attempts to foil traffic analysis by reordering messages. Note: I'm relying on the word of the remailer operator here, and haven't verified the reord info myself. mon Remailer has been known to monitor contents of private email. filter Remailer has been known to filter messages based on content. If not listed in conjunction with mon, then only messages destined for public forums are subject to filtering. Raph Levien

1 0

Patel's Opinion
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John and Stanton, Greg Broiles fedexed us a clear, scannable copy of Patel's August 25 Opinion, which we've digitized and formatted, in case EFF wants to use it to supplement the admirable volunteer effort: http://jya.com/bernstein-III.htm (93K)

1 0

No Subject
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 05:55 PM 8/26/97 +1000, A non-stoned David Formosa wrote: >I take a second sample from our plunger wealding cop, its the blood of a >homospapain i.e. a human. > >The cop can't become inhuman by any action thay take. Humans can be very kind and polite, or they can just be murdering assholes. So in Dave's defense, despite the fact he made an argumant sounding like he was on crack, I have to say that plungering someone is part of human nature. We're all capable of things along that line, and anyone who thinks otherwise must have forgotten about the holocaust. Does that make it any less wrong to do that? Fuck no. That cop should still go to prison for life, at least.

1 0