December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Prior Restraint
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

"In a stunning rebuke to overzealous prosecutors," reports the New York-based National Coalition Against Censorship, the owner and manager of the store called simply Newstand, in Bellingham, Wash., have been found not guilty and awarded $1.3 million "for prior restraint and for retaliatory prosecution" by a U.S. District Court jury in Seattle. Ira Stohl and Kristina Hjelsand had been charged with obscenity for selling the controversial magazine "Answer Me!" a short-lived but legendary periodical that offered extremely politically incorrect articles about rape, among other subjects. The NCAC earlier reported the owners of Newstand rejected an offer from the prosecutor to drop criminal charges in return for a promise not to carry further issues of "Answer Me!" or "anything remotely similar." Instead, the freedom fighters displayed the magazine in their store, chained, under lock and key. The jury found that the troglodytes in charge of Whatcom County had violated Stohl and Hjelsand's First Amendment rights, caused emotional suffering, and damaged their business. Censorship News, the quarterly newsletter of the NCAC, is published out of 275 Seventh Ave., New York, N.Y. 10001, e-mail ncac(a)netcom.com, web page http://www.ncac.org. Vin Suprynowicz is the assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Readers may contact him via e-mail at vin(a)lvrj.com. The web site for the Suprynowicz column is at http://www.nguworld.com/vindex/. *** Vin Suprynowicz, vin(a)lvrj.com Voir Dire: A French term which means "jury stacking."

1 0

Re: (Fwd) 1995 Nanotechnology Conference
by J. Kent Hastings 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-- [ From: J. Kent Hastings * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- James and cpunx, >At 11:45 AM 8/19/95 -0400, John Young wrote: >>Fourth Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology >And what does this have to do with cryptography? Doesn't quantum coherence require molecular precision if it is to work on 1024 bit PGP keys? If it works, such keys can be instantly factorized. It would be nice to follow that progress. If human engineered molecular nano works, we'll have much more than PGP to worry about. Copies of copies of replicating disassemblers could rip the Earth apart in three days, assuming doubling every 20 minutes like bacteria, but not limited to proteins. That would have a big impact on digital cash networks! Kent -- "Put pages for your business on the World Wide Web, just $5 per month!" J. Kent Hastings -- zeus(a)pinsight.com -- http://www.pinsight.com/~zeus/

1 0

Re: New Crypto Application
by Guillotine 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The first of ten replies to my e-mail that has any decent information... >>I'm creating a new _text_ cryptography program. > >What do you mean by "text cryptography"? You'll only accept text as input, >or you'll produce your output in ASCII, or you'll produce your output >as English-like words? It's going to be a GUI program for Windows/95 (evil, I know, but where else is the money at?) written in Delphi. For a quick explanation... it has two memo-textareas for the input and output and one edit-area for the key. I called it a _text_ encryption program because it's a small application like NotePad.exe which you can just type into, encrypt, and copy the output into your e-mail or into a file... and it accepts ANY ascii characters as input. The output is as garbled as hell too, not alphanumeric. > None of the common encryption algorithms treats >text input any differently that raw bits, and it's worth taking whatever >input you have and compressing it to reduce the amount of data the >encryption and transmission phases need to handle. Producing printable >ASCII as an output format isn't a cryptography issue - it's just a >simple reversable transform from a bunch of raw bits to printable, >and there's no excuse for inventing a new format rather than using >MIME encoding, uuencode, or btoa, unless you're doing something extremely >creative with Unicode... True, it's all raw bits to this program. As an added plus, it supports pasting from clipboard of any binary format using a clipboard memory dump. Just go to your favorite graphics program and copy an entire picture, paste it, and encrypt it. I see no use for that whatsoever, but the point is that if you copy it to clipboard, it can paste and encrypt it. Since Win95 has the ability to copy and paste even FILES then I guess that those who want file encryption are in luck, I have implemented the file detection for clipboard usage and I have also implemented manual file selection and encryption. >Producing output as English-like words is more interesting. >It's a steganography issue, not a cryptography issue, since you should >be doing the secure part first anyway, but it can be useful for >obscuring the fact that you're using crypto in a message. >The canonical reference is to Peter Wayner's Mimic Functions, >which let you model an arbitrary context-free grammar for output, >but you should also look around for "texto". (The other canonical >reference is to "PHB", Dilbert's program that disguises the message >in Pointy Haired Boss jargon, but I'm not aware that anyone's written it.) >A good book to read on cryptois Bruce Schneier's "Applied Cryptography", >which discusses most of the current algorithms and how they're used. Me and a friend of mine have written some new bit switching procedures which use keys to encrypt the input in a dozen different number systems, but since that realllllllly slows it down I'm going to have to write a random number/phrase generator mainly used to hash the key and make it a couple of dozen characters long no matter how long it is. Brute force will be possible (it's unavoidable!) but just decrypting the text alone will not work. It will have to contain an ability to hash a guessed key just like this program and then try the guess, making it take much longer in general to brute force it. That doesn't apply to the governments computers, but since when does anything to do with slowing down brute forcing apply to them and their mainframe-using crypanalytic selves??? >>The encryption algorithm, >>using a symmetrical is going to be as strong as legally allowed, >There are no legal restrictions on cryptography strength in the US; >only restrictions on what's exportable, and even then you need permission. I was just implying of the possibility that the US might soon resolve some _MORE_ restrictions on cryptography, since they've already proven their capability of imposing as much on the US. Thanks for the information Bill! For who ever said that I was going to release the source to this program's copy protection... I'M NOT! I don't have to prove to you how good or bad its copy protection is!!! Someone will reverse-engineer it anyways, and it might as well take them a day or ten. Besides, this program isn't even going to cost ten bucks.... but I'll stop now before this e-mail spams any further. Guillotine

1 0

Cypherpunks Santa Cruz meeting/party, Saturday, 26 August
by tcmay＠got.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is the last announcement I'll make here on the general Cypherpunks list for this meeting/party at my house. I keep a mailing list for interested folks, with about 35-40 names on it (not all of them local to Santa Cruz and Monterey, needless to say). To be added, send me mail...no special format, as I keep the list manually in Eudora Pro. Here are just a few details. WHAT: Cypherpunks Santa Cruz meeting/party. A chance for locals to meet, and for others who want to vary their routine to visit this area. WHEN: Saturday, August 26th, 1995, beginning at around 6 p.m., but early arrivers can arrive as early as 5 (some are travelling from afar, so...). Several people plan to stay over until Sunday. WHERE: Tim May's house in Corralitos, between Aptos and Watsonville. 427 Allan Lane, 408-728-0152. Detailed directions available from the full announcement. WHO: Anybody who wants to attend. It will be both a meeting and a party, so children and SOs may find it boring--you have been warned. Some local people interested in crypto or related issues are on this list, even if they're not subscribers to the Cypherpunks main list. --Tim May ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net (Got net?) | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-728-0152 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Corralitos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."

1 0

Whither Barbados?
by rah＠shipwright.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I've cc'd (former cypherpunk) Vince Cate on Anguilla on this for obvious reasons. I got a bit of blurbuge in the USnail from the Barbados Investment and Development Corporation (BIDC) on their 3rd Barbados Information Services Converence, (Subtitled "Surfing the Global Net from Caribbean Shores" ;-), February 26/27 1996. The headers in the blurb were: Investment Management in Emerging Markets -- Information Technology Challenges, Network Security on the Global Net, New Opportunities in Wireless Communications, Barbados -- the Carribbean hub for Internet Access. They promise a "Full Conference Programme available October 1, 1995", and they seem to have a mailbot at info_bisc(a)caribnet.net. Having inadvertantly <ahem> plugged their stuff with no idea whether it's a waste of time or not, I have a few thoughts about this and about data/banking havens in general. First, here's what I know about internet access in the Caribbean, gleaned from discussions with Vince, and by lurking on various caribbean newsgroups (see soc.culture.caribbean), web pages, and mail groups: First off, bandwidth down there sucks. This is probably because there really aren't many people there, the ones that are there are pretty poor, and they can't buy much phone time. This is compounded by monopolies, Cable and Wireless being the biggest, built on cozy relationships with government officials, if not actual creatures of those government officials themselves, amortizing their <exageration mode on> 30 year old centrex switches with 50 year schedules <e.m. off>. To be fair, they have to have long distance lines to the mainland, and those cost, whether they're copper, fiber, or satellite. All the shenanigans of third world politics apply there. Trinidad and Tabago had an attempted coup recently, Barbados, I believe, is in the throes of a constitutional crisis where the speaker of their legislature can't be impeached because she won't conviene the committee to impeach her... Not to mention hurricanes, and in Montserrat, a volcano going off at the moment... The obvious reason I'm interested in this is regulatory arbitrage, of course. If there's a government that will let internet commerce and privacy flourish there, then it flourishes everywhere on the net, national borders or no. I hear tell that Barbados is serious about converting its information technology business from data entry and forms processing to web-cluefullness. Given that their business development people don't have their own domain name, they probably have a bit to go. So, I have a little exercise... If we were to tell the government of Barbados what it had to do to promote the creation of internet commerce, what would we say? Anyone here could probably crank out a prima facie set of reccommendations, but I figure to beat this to death canonically and have a little fun at the same time. So, here a few categories to get started. I'm trying to keep it relevant to this group's charter. Infrastructure Power Long distance Local wire Local wireless Regulatory Financial Privacy Laws Telecommunications Competition Civil/Human Rights Privacy Business Deregulation Government intervention in the economy Culture Religeous/Cultural tolerance (the Netherlands are tolerant, for instance) Education (talent pool) Well, that's a place to start. I'll try to plug in my 2 cents in another posting... Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Shipwright Development Corporation, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA (617) 323-7923 "Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell >>>>Phree Phil: Email: zldf(a)clark.net http://www.netresponse.com/zldf <<<<<

1 0

NYTimes: Disappearing Cryptography
by Attila T. Hun 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- _________________________________________________________ Forwarded to you by Attila T. Hun <attila(a)hun.attila.org> July 29, 1997 Giving Away Secrets By PETER WAYNER NYTimes OpEd BALTIMORE -- Internet hype can turn age-old problems into new grave threats. The biggest tempest may be the concern over the use of encryption, or secret codes, to scramble information sent over the Internet and other computer networks. The use of codes may thrill people who want to protect the business plans on their office computers and the love letters they send by E-mail. But it worries the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Louis J. Freeh, and other law-enforcement officials. Mr. Freeh is right to be concerned that encryption can limit the ability of law enforcement to gather electronic evidence from wiretaps and court-ordered searches. But he was wrong when he recently told the Senate Judiciary Committee that "technology and telecommunications well beyond the contemplation of the Framers" will bring "a terrible upset of the balance so wisely set forth in the Fourth Amendment." In other words, he envisions the balance tipping against the police, because they will have more difficulty conducting reasonable searches if more of the information they are seeking is encrypted. Yet cryptography wasn't beyond the contemplation of the Framers, because many of them were skilled code makers and code breakers themselves. David Kahn's book "The Codebreakers" tells how codes have affected history for more than 3,000 years. According to Mr. Kahn, George Washington had to deal with the problem when a coded message was intercepted in August 1775 from Benjamin Church, a member of the Massachusetts Congress who was a spy for the British. The message, which was finally deciphered, told the English details of American troop movements. As Mr. Kahn reveals, both sides in the Revolutionary War made extensive use of encryption. Benedict Arnold designed the complex code that he used to sell out his country. James Lovell of the Continental Congress helped win the war by breaking the codes used by General Cornwallis. After the war, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison communicated in their own private code. And Benjamin Franklin devised his own cipher for sending dispatches from Europe. Yet in writing the Bill of Rights, the Founders did not forbid cryptography, even though they knew how powerful a tool it could be. Nor did they suggest that the police be able to obtain the plain text of a coded message. But that could happen under a measure sponsored by Senator Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat, and Senator John McCain of Arizona, a Republican. Under their bill, the key to any code used to scramble information sent on the Internet would have to be given to the proper authorities. The Clinton Administration supports similar measures. James Bamford, in "The Puzzle Palace," describes how the F.B.I. broke the case of the gangsters who were communicating without phone calls or letters. Agents discovered that the gangsters sent their shirts to Las Vegas to be dry cleaned -- and that the number of shirts held the coded message. No ban on cryptography on the Internet will be able to thwart creative crooks like these, but diligent police work can find cracks in the armor. This is why the National Research Council has recommended that Congress invest in research to help the F.B.I. better understand computers and codes. The F.B.I. faces a daunting task. Encryption makes it impossible for agents to gather all the evidence they would like. But the answer is not to regulate, and in effect destroy, the use of coded messages. Criminals would probably find a way around the rules, and the rest of us could lose a powerful tool for protecting our privacy. Peter Wayner is the author of "Disappearing Cryptography." _____________________ End forwarded message ______________________________________________________________________ "attila" 1024/C20B6905/23 D0 FA 7F 6A 8F 60 66 BC AF AE 56 98 C0 D7 B0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be iQCVAwUBM92xDL04kQrCC2kFAQE+qQP/WIO0Mj/GX5ANiyq2ekCbOiN1lfYKl/MN H6/X0TdHIEpcmZipTzxuC4UOQ4rR7XUOXRneDSiLBS+OEFCRGlm85/o8/dTWgRsG lMVF0SDR44GwONBik2sH1rV4b3m+GUzvTGvPIBkybjU2wSfZUrwSQALeRuvxkABq 8C5sJ6waEV4= =SLL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: NSA leak (fwd)
by Secret Squirrel 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd) From: h_tuttle(a)rigel.cyberpass.net > Terawatts for a few microseconds is fairly standard technology, I > believe. Femtosecond laser pulses driven by *very* large capacitor > banks... I'm talking continuous generation - sustained for half an hour... > > Terrestrial fusion is not a serious contender yet, and I doubt > > it will be for a long time. > > It's easy to generate lots of power through fusion. The problem is > confinement. I'm still talking continuous generation - we'll leave out the H-bombs. And of course I agree confinement is a major problem. Last I heard from the cutting edge (early '90s) you could get 2MW out of a fusion reactor, but that was less than you put in to start it up. That was using Deuterium, being gentle in order to preserve the reactor. Predictions were that using D-T would break even. Even that isn't anywhere near a commercial scale generator. You know of better results ? There certainly are a number of approaches, but I think I'd know if commercial fusion reactors were working. Are you ready to take this off-list ?

1 0

Re: Newton 2
by ethridge＠Onramp.NET 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<<crossed to cypherpunks>> >At 8:56 AM 8/21/95, Robert Patoine wrote: > >>Metroworks do Have a C Compiler for the Newton Hardware develloped for >>Sony-Magic Cap OS > >Magic Cap works on Magic Cap PDAs. The newton is not one of them. >Motorola uses magic cap for their PDAs, and I think AT&T does as well, but >that's an uncertainty. > Considering that AT&T markets PersonaLink as an e-mail service for MagicCap users i suspect they do support MagicCap in at least one of their PDAs. PersonaLink is, i believe, related to Telescript, which is the scripting language for MagicCap (OK, it's a bit more than a scripting language, but i'm not that into it). I've heard a few times that not having a C compiler prevents the implementation of PGP. Why? Do the RSA people refuse to license a non-C implementation. If so, can they still enforce their patent against someone who implemented it on a platform that didn't have a C compiler? But then i hear that the Newton will have some support for C development sometime this year. allen

2 1

Re: Liability for Key Cracking in Idle Hours?
by Damien.Doligez＠inria.fr 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Damien may be able to tell us if Ecole Polytechnique has raised any >questions about his highly-publicized attack on the SSL Challenge key. Well, I asked for permission before I used the machines, so I don't expect any problem. (Actually, I asked for the permission, then launched the processes, then got the permission, but it doesn't make any difference, does it ? I should have also asked permission for putting their name in my announce, though.) It seems that the Herald Tribune called them about a cracker, and they refused to comment. They must have gone in paranoid mode, because they've had lots of trouble with student crackers in the past, and there is currently not even one student on the campus. But now, the situation seems to be in control, although I had no official contact from Ecole Polytechnique. Ecole Normale Superieure did not react at all. They're all on vacation anyway. By the way, "cypherpunks" keep getting mentioned in interviews with the press. I hope that's OK with you all. -- Damien

1 0

Finally the Answer to LIFE!! Real Science, NOT FICTION!
by 64355512＠nowhere.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FINALLY, THE ANSWER TO LIFE!! Science, Not-Fiction Have you ever pondered any of these questions? 1.What is the origin of life? 2.What is Life? 3.How were we created? 4.What happens when we die? 5.Is there other life out there? 6.Do we ever become immortal? FOR THE ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS AND MORE, POINT YOUR BROWSER TO www.wgn.net/~dicewars/ www.wgn.net/~dicewars/

1 0