- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Press Release on Secure NCSA Mosiac
by Phil G. Fraering 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Another question entirely: Might it be better just to use some sort of stream cypher that works by XOR'ing the stream against a large one-time pad where the used parts are deleted as it goes along? I'm thinking currently of telnet-level applications or larger-level ones based on telnet like HTTP (I know, technically there are better descriptions of HTTP and the like). It would be easy to pre-distribute the one-time pads via PGP or RSA. This has the advantage of not locking the whole infrastructure into a single public key system. Phil

1 0

Re: Money Laundering thru Roulette
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

There was a more interesting case in, I believe, Australia. Someone who wanted to bribe a politician instead libeled him. The politician sued, and they ``settled'' out of court. Interesting also that in some states judgements are non-taxible. :)

1 0

Re: Black Net
by Phil G. Fraering 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>I was assuming it was a wet dream of a few 15 year olds. (ROTFL). He. Hehe. Hehehehahahahahahaha... pgf

1 0

ID list
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

WOw. I have recieved 4 replies in 2 hours. I propose the following for the list of ID types: Please incude the date and month of the card issuance, so it can be included in the list. Many people have states that let licenses go for 5 years so outdated information is a problem. The greatest concerns are the digitized photo, the magnetic strip and the bar code. Please include a yes/no for each of these at least. The type of card (laminated... not laminated... etc) is also helpful. I'm amazed at the response. The identity of contributers will not be put on the list, and anonymous submissions are encouraged. -uni- (Dark)

1 0

Re: Banyan vine use by US Marine Corps...
by gtoal＠an-teallach.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

: I don't know how I got onto this list, or many others to which I seem to : suddenly belong, but I'd be eternally grateful if you removed me from this one. What's probably happened is that someone has forged a subscription to a mailing list or two in your name. This is a fairly common net prank. Who have you annoyed recently? G PS The chances of catching the person from the mailer logs of the various lists you have been subscribed to is small but it's worth asking the people in charge if the original subscription request can still be found. Often there will be clues in the header as to where the forgery came from. (Eric, are you listening?)

1 0

BlackNet
by Tommy the Tourist 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.3 hIwCHO5QWqKhlGkBA/9ntWBcGjKRDaylUbaOsVV++uf7N2GKC7kbx81+3lnBfi14 dZnHqWmYfYb5ybJnAOJbAclVvYTJIZxdicA9a9Ep55Whj7zrdCfpDclAOet3eJG/ 49OrGnTyL/ZOyxb8TBodwXR8f7xKwmepoMx87wF0LGSy4OuZXYQZfZmwm7tNd6YA AAjndumh/NtASPVx/yA0uitYULgAwbNjfLQNaXBM3Ti6n0w7bnRMJPkMU2+s6n++ +kI+tbLKt4PES3QXF2qQ0Ts1DMGFuwd3YBh5o9qwEom9RXRMTE+5oYwpn0ESYtfS Oi/mnXLqCA5X/cNvQkgngwOffIOqQ8c90C3F5bx+72G+dHcAi8tc+4SPaAzRW9ol nxWU78fh7ECNga3CjTkLgADhUzb1JGAtWMhvKnoDWDsp+1Fbf6cvluAlRAFtwZR4 6yqsGngJwEEkYpsxGLrIlakMS+xDQjgYeb7h5we8rYufZInJITF/BaaTyj2VeVYU M/ucUGm0o1GwaxdLsecV4wAhGKmQWZ1MyM1CWxSN5xE1ZApCreUAc1INOnRfWl3d LeKcfzEqnycyltneyVQ/J0pRiFFNQerRaenr7/QOJGexWqPG7t1e/mHthVgyxC0u Bcq+wdWFdNBQhPEXF0Y5TVlpJlPVvZxFVS7HQUTFXMMHnMh/b5B4dmWrsjZOghbN gPv6dbZoYgNUQsnfU5GuXtMKmh3DGJM13b958scjmW+zomovZqe/Z1QaPHnDJwY4 tdDJclLJAGw59jXHr7jouBjWhYYmsXTnOH0+fb9UMtE8Biai6Pq3/ncYCWUEtIxV jdBo6qQzT9wo+cWgLgXRnTOecLV/VlME4RIbujsQHhz1AFTSJvV2C9JRCL5JhwvL 9Ap8nFhfjPbo2xzGKJScNebWoVi9qsQjUO42OsVi6OL6BHXNvvtx6sODBwsZkRcq Hg6kdodt1CUzraIFVw34HACHjdj/4KIFP9kKd7br46eN+9ItSJ4TYrDCoJ1SIetH omJ5WaQ+zhgGY4KXpbyYmDxfqaXKxB8kt7+7e6xt/P6drQu+/A+ZweD2lPK6zKE8 32Gvrj1sdOOxl5+z4nlW4TyEoWYUGIdfKy/AJWKfOTGESTZM9og83Xqy87lj9HRw vw9NEYZ9XT94T95eQJM3iqgC5P3SaVT7ssB/5ycKabWS0dD5QIkhW+Q4xyDd+Yan HsJHvED3W/vDrKsk5kkYU5GevyDmEPg/acU4eZouNnTO4lRz4LXgsGIi35YO7DvL jAyVyAzbEJtmXcP3+C2IoDhdzBCJ+jUWZP8MtHrWrq7sQ9Jbe2TTe720mSeARHk2 VEcPTFFa1+NC6v0fiVmHvzOBc6E13l4QGCepufX0gxZHZb5WQGDKCc97bCz3rD6q bJbRJ95zefey++nrq3XfyEZ+bfx+aRUkA/bDj6AOAPh6pSlMlj3elegWy25QRWim +fEi3Q1Mfb+w6wgohf3V3ZLlwsSOwRpinYa7C2wkUT4aHg6HMW3vH/NbumLWfv34 nqSNuaSzX/IuioHAd5Fwl8iZZi/ji2dtivvd4hZ0fgF50BXzHCABqLAW6T2TYMr/ OITvF0LEGiadjCgkfnFRSzEYxW1cFAlNiVmP+ueQpIe+mKP52I9z3lczdAl6mNxy MQoh0rUavaXphKFjOQ3u+pt3nggHFTglnNjbb6IK+rn4A9pF+4a5w/BpF+2GgWed TBu7pY57zX0XpkHxZZ75dhzT5vMvFmcdODZTdlxxJputG4S1+P3L2uIp8yPVQe9m +6+EC5X3Aid4lHGrOe0i+IczcNUQ+D5ZLHBrj7IAtzcbKJLi7gLwkDByCqbCcVVJ uTZSBHlZgdw7bp6zKXLDfIHn42URgwI52AC8GZ1FbjWeFCdzuL9adUTPvGsMhcxJ HAoh7Rq72eJ2TBe7oi69JwAlLxR8kK3xExGrTy4blzHqMti2sne2LfT9kWxEDRLe o+y0WvZVhjH8qSKdBrL2JJDgKuWCECGLff8zm2mZcSQhHI2ZUwvC41uatpdsaUdx kAVEMMiY0e5pF5ukUg7xT5I9Y0qSqt7pbGB8idkzusRos2Be5vw4ZJeyBxoKulUj zQZmJKSbe/Ojejcwb46+ip1o4wus8Mli1MAujEnKgLj+D/9Ihzgj2/7Is9IP7W33 D+622fhDwJ8edy0MQtYMHAWQ11PbcOeeu3dbTORC+R68MGREdgv3DekCjify1iiT YTmlu+MHaCdTzhrCeKS/zzJGLz+6QZAP6HmZOVoIRmR0j5Qt/WEpJb+2DE7kjeW7 3ENbYprr1OULHhOfSQJhyJtDwWs/RG3azXW3i0ONIu3gNLQxJs8QOlPwBQDUQA8S pV8O/qslpQDEZSfSx/VMg9RdtXUqST/P3GuwV6sYWRFIshWuV563ds4HdJFxMJPu 5lSxYp+9eH+eYq4ZBhtzaV8Do5GxI/BSQ2O4axhyY+b3RTbhmSnomI2mOnwQx8Lp 6SH8oF0hDkdZzwGEde9vVCOpRJYf6P2qRz1zzdO9Ey1R/CCH1K2TLv3UnxzijpaI j9zl9xGHBiY2HLDwCeKu7jYPyKTXZyQ5JYyfGalB72nJvGxazkYfUWoUsnewB7+j V3XFyZFqmzqyyTsQZ1eOsVRFAJeb1YOT6U38JC0Ic4IYdyfW1qOSUzgp3GE1aFm+ p5+R5JYLkOUXzhT0wyHuDIEKbrJPVUMS7k6mnVbb3U0cKlGvss+0q0l3UXtOZo00 QUph9WhFweJoHkjoH50pAE0DK+SbH7C5u89zmr2PsEYmxYEldBQxdeJKyaS++131 m4IcfTrfo3awhIg0fcB3vBAlyYWYelmjiPiGZLOxxylydm5ZRF4P1LMJ2isW6QHj 5vqtVXIJXpBgF9XYOvcCrU2JbJeHKmjS57f3r0sJwxFUnAogQe4eT6L4DfroW4rB 6HOdFv515MbAz/FiL5S5Ix/YT5XixwPG6uvof2HG+Y0y5g3d8whVQicplgE8+gt0 P7VdlP5JEiVc3Z3zkgUetklIQ5CQ6ItsCnTA8vMQMdaPrMb4SJJYzsN0Sqg+b+69 9oT+rVuDUVpxpbfm1lFps2AgkywXD720sxYjjHYA9XgzuFpQTts7jAdaySY9Degy ueKfTs70iLArlShlTqhwN+8lH17xUnJJIXQJlEtgOEirGdrvxeGiXn5BIC5XJmiF 1+NclT6dSmSZbharXdGvGG9T937W4uc2L28= =OQxE -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------ To respond to the sender of this message, send mail to remailer(a)soda.berkeley.edu, starting your message with the following 7 lines: :: Response-Key: key1 ====Encrypted-Sender-Begin==== MI@UPK]5,.,7),)JND-3:V2TNU+?^3/1F!^=ZYA$<89[2;4KRE#:&@PV&AE3S 3I&0V]DN$FA*&<TC7?[TL24B*-P`` ====Encrypted-Sender-End====

1 0

Re: 15 out of 16 times (math, not laundry)
by collins＠newton.apple.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Pretend the casino is run out of a church. "Parishioners" arrive and >enter a confessional to place their bets. The "priest" cannot see who >is placing each bet. Each "parishioner" plays until he or she is >broke. "Parishioners" arrive at a steady rate and will do so >indefinitely. Let me just make sure I understand what you mean. I believe you are saying: Conjecture A: A.1 As parishoners play and leave, the division of wealth approaches the `odds' of the game. Thus if the odds are .51 house (of God), .49 parishoner, then eventually the house will end up with 51 cents out of every dollar `played'. Just as it would if the church were playing against one very wealthy parishoner (i.e., the `world'). A.2 Since there are a large number of parishoners, enough games can always be played to make the distribution match the odds. If this is _not_ what you mean to say then I apologize for missing your point; read no further---just send me explanations to clear up my mis-understanding. If Conjecture A is accurate statement of your belief, then please step across this line. ---------- Let me walk through your model, one parishoner at a time. Please read this with an open mind; it could be true. >Each "parishioner" plays until he or she is broke. Lets say the odds of the game are .51 to .49. Each parishoner has $100. Each parishoner plays until broke. At some point in play, the distribution of wealth with respect to _that player_ may be arbitrarily close to c=$51, p=$49. What, though, is the distribution at the _end_ of that game? Since each game only ends when the p=$0, the distribution is c=$100, p=$0. On to the next parishoner. After the 9th, but before the 10th parishoner, the distribution must be c=$900, p[10]=$100. It can't be worse than that for the church, or we wouldn't have moved on to the 10th parishoner. It can't be better for the player because each has only $100 to wager. After the n'th, c=$100n, p[n+1]=$100. Conjecture A predicts that as n, the number of players, goes to infinity, c, the fraction of money won by the church, approaches C, the probability the church will win a single trial. But in fact, the model shows that as n approaches infinity, c goes to 1. Where could one disagree with this interpretation of the model? a. Maybe the church has 10 confessionals, or 1000, or 10,000. Serializing the players might be a `paper' advantage to the church that doesn't occur in reality. b. Players can have any amount of money, not just $100 dollars. c. What if the church goes broke? (a) Imagine that the church has at most k confessionals, and thus can play no more than k simultaneous games. Fill all k. All other players are waiting in line for an open spot. The next parishoner can't play until an existing player goes broke. The distribution of wealth during play by the (k-1+10)th player is exactly as before, except now it is +/-$100(k-1). (b) has no impact. As above, at the end of each game the fraction of money won by the church with respect to that player is 1 (assuming it's the player and not the church that `went out'). (c) If the church goes broke, all bets are off, literally but not figuratively. The distribution of wealth is c=0, P=1 (P for all players as opposed to p for a single player). This also does not match the expectation of .51. >The chance of the "church" to win or lose is the same on every >bet, regardless of who places it. That is true. But the only way the player can realize his mathematical expectations is if he is allowed to continue playing even after he is out of money (i.e., so he can climb back out of the hole). Ok, the first player goes out, but the infinity of players after him can make up for that, right? Wrong, because on his way to winning back the first players money, if the second player goes broke, _his_ game is over. Now its up the third guy, ad infinitum (literally)..... just because the series is infinite doesn't mean the sum is. No set of players, all of whom go broke, break the church. Therefore, for the series to end it must be instigated by a set of players that includes at least one who doesn't go broke (i.e., the church goes broke instead). In fact, a single player who doesn't go broke ends the series without any help from other players. Thus, to stem the tide of pious donations (i.e., the church's winnings), a single player with enough money to `outlast' the church is required. Hope you found this interesting but not insulting, Scott Collins | "That's not fair!" -- Sarah | "You say that so often. I wonder what your basis 408.862.0540 | for comparison is." -- Goblin King ................|.................................................... BUSINESS. fax:974.6094 R254(IL5-2N) collins(a)newton.apple.com Apple Computer, Inc. 5 Infinite Loop, MS 305-2D Cupertino, CA 95014 ..................................................................... PERSONAL. 408.257.1746 1024:669687 catalyst(a)netcom.com

2 1

Hello
by Neal M. Goldsmith 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

My friend has been forwarding some of your material to me. I'd like to learn more about what you do. Is there some overview piece describing your varied interests. Are you a you or a group? Thanks, Neal

1 0

Blacknet and espionage.
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Just some sage advice for newbies: Stay away from Blacknet unless your a serious customer. Ames was a major Blacknet user. I don't think the authorities will take a bright view of anyone posting about it publically. On the otherhand, if you have legitimate information to pass, and want money for it, and don't mind taking quick and speedy trips to other jurisdictions in disguise, go for it! -uni- (Dark)

3 2

Re: Banyan vine use by US Marine Corps...
by Jim Franklin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I don't know how I got onto this list, or many others to which I seem to suddenly belong, but I'd be eternally grateful if you removed me from this one. thanks, jim

1 0