December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

"deadbeat parents"
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

apparently one of the 4 horsemen of the infocalypse...?!?! whatever can be used as an excuse to take away rights, eh? ------- Forwarded Message Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 15:18:11 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Clinton Signs New Deadbeat Parents Penalties into Law Source: USIA Clinton Signs New Deadbeat Parents Penalties into Law U.S. Newswire 24 Jun 9:06 President Clinton Signs New Deadbeat Parents Penalties into Law To: National Desk Contact: White House Press Office, 202-456-2100 WASHINGTON, June 24 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following was released today by the White House: Today, President Clinton will announce new statistics highlighting the success of Administration child support enforcement efforts and will sign into law tough new penalties for parents who repeatedly refuse to pay child support. At an Oval Office ceremony, the President will announce that a new child support collection system launched nine months ago has already located one million deliquent parents, and the child support enforcement program established a record 1.3 million paternities in 1997. Overall, 68 percent more child support was collected in 1997 than in 1992. The bill he will sign into law, the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act of 1998, is based on his 1996 proposal for tougher penalties for parents who repeatedly fail to support children living in another state or who flee across state lines to avoid supporting them. Finally, the President will reiterate his position that bankruptcy reform legislation should not make it harder to collect child support and alimony. New Hire Directory Finds One Million Deliquent Parents. Today, the President will announce that the new National Directory of New Hires had located one million deliquent parents since its October 1, 1997 launch. The directory, proposed by the President in 1994, and enacted as part of the 1996 welfare reform law, helps track parents across state lines and withhold their wages by enabling child support officials to match records of delinquent parents with wage records from throughout the nation. Approximately one-third of all child support cases involve parents living in different states. (See attached chart) A Record Number of Paternity Establishments. The President will also announce that the child support enforcement program established a record 1.3 million paternities in 1997, two and a half times the 1992 figure of 510,000. Much of this success is due to the in-hospital voluntary paternity establishment program begun by the Clinton Administration in 1994, which encourages fathers to acknowledge paternity at the time of the child's birth. A Record Increase in Child Support Collections. In 1997, the state and federal child support enforcement program collected a record $13. 4 billion for children, an increase of 68% from 1992, when $8 billion was collected. Not only are collections up, but the number of families that are actually receiving child support has also increased. In 1997, the number of child support cases with collections rose to 4.2 million, an increase of 48% from 2.8 million in 1992. New Felony Penalties for Egregious Failure to Pay Child Support. The President called for these tough new penalties in July 1996 and again in his 1997 State of the Union address. This new law creates two new categories of felonies, with penalties of up to two years in prison, for more egregious child support evaders: Traveling across state or country lines with the intent to evade child support payments will now be considered a felony if the obligation has remained unpaid for a period longer than one year or is greater than $5,000. When the obligation has remained unpaid for a period of longer than two years or is greater than $10,000, willful failure to pay child support to a child residing in another state will be considered a felony. This bill was sponsored in Congress by Representatives Hyde and Hoyer and Senators DeWine and Kohl, and had overwhelming bipartisan support in both houses. Responsible Bankruptcy Reform that Doesn't Hurt Children. Finally, the President will reiterate his position that bankruptcy reform legislation should not make it harder to collect child support and alimony. The Administration will work with Congress to produce a bankruptcy reform bill that asks responsibility of both creditors and debtors, while stemming abuse. In those discussions, the President will continue to make protecting child support and alimony a top priority. The House and Senate bills still raise the concern that additional debts will survive bankruptcy and compete with child support and alimony payments for scarce funds. -0- /U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/ 06/24 09:06 Copyright 1998, U.S. Newswire - ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. - ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer ********************************************** ------- End of Forwarded Message

2 1

RE: CIA 4 Nags: Hackers Crypto Y2K Foreigners
by Jean-Francois Avon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:18:44 -0700, Ernest Hua wrote: >Now, if, next week, someone demonstrates a gun or some other physical >offensive weapon easily manufacturable using off the shelf parts at $10 >a pop with less than $50 start-up costs (these numbers must include the >entire mechanism; in the case of a gun, it would include the bullets). Operational homemade firearms are often found to have been built by convicts in high security prisons... Check with the NRA or with the NFA (Canada) e-mail: nfadat(a)telusplanet.net Web site: http://nfa.ca/ Ask David Tomlinson for info on the topic, he'll tell you... Ciao jfa Definition: FACISM: n.: a political and economic movement, strongly nationalistic, magnifying the rights of the state as opposed to those of the individual, in which industry, though remaining largely under private ownership, and all administrative political units, are controlled by a strong central government. ------------------------------------------------- "One of the ordinary modes by which tyrants accomplish their purpose, without resistance, is by disarming the people and making it an offense to keep arms". - Joseph Story, U.S. Supreme Court Justice. ------------------------------------------------- the German gun control laws were enacted by the "liberal" Weimar Republic government that preceded Hitler, and were a strong aid to his coming to power -- because they disarmed Hitler's opponents, and Hitler's adherents ignored them -- as criminals have always ignored gun control laws. Disarming the public is a frequent first step toward dictatorships and genocides. Once the disarming is complete, the public is helpless against those who have the guns. ------------------------------------------------- PGP keys: http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html PGP ID:C58ADD0D:529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 PGP ID:5B51964D:152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C

1 0

RSA and Others work on SSL Fix
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FYI RSA DATA SECURITY WORKS WITH INTERNET SOFTWARE VENDORS TO RESPON 6/26/98 7:19 to Potential Security Attack on Secure Web Communications SAN MATEO, Calif., June 26 /PRNewswire/ -- RSA Data Security, Inc. today announced it is working with a group of leading Internet software vendors on pre-emptive countermeasures to thwart a newly-discovered potential attack against secure Web communications. This vulnerability is currently the subject of research and has not been reported by any users. These countermeasures enhance the security of popular Internet server software products based on the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol. The countermeasures are, or will be, available from respective vendors' Web sites, and include configuration guidelines, software updates where applicable and additional information. Currently available vendor information may be found at the following sites: * C2Net Software, Inc. http://www.c2.net * Consensus Development Corporation http://www.consensus.com/ssl-rsa.html * IBM Corporation http://www.ibm.com/security * Lotus Development Corporation http://www.lotus.com/security * Microsoft Corporation http://www.microsoft.com/security * Netscape Communications Corporation http://help.netscape.com/products/server/ssldiscovery/index.html * Open Market, Inc. http://www.openmarket.com/security * RSA Data Security, Inc. http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/ RSA will also maintain an updated list of all vendors' countermeasure site links at its site. In addition, RSA has been working closely with the CERT Coordination Center on this problem. CERT has made a technical advisory on this vulnerability available at http://www.cert.org. These countermeasures address a potential vulnerability discovered by cryptographer Daniel Bleichenbacher of the Secure Systems Research Department of Bell Labs, the research and development arm of Lucent Technologies. Bleichenbacher identified a cryptanalytic vulnerability that could potentially be used to discover the key for a particular encrypted session through a process of repeatedly sending on the order of one million carefully constructed messages to a target server and observing the server's response. Due to the large number of messages needed, the potential attack is detectable by network administrators. Additional information is available on the Bell Labs Web site at http://www.bell-labs.com. The vulnerability affects interactive key establishment protocols that use the Public Key Cryptography Standard (PKCS) #1, including SSL. The PKCS series of standards are defined by RSA Laboratories, reviewed by industry and have been adopted by many major vendors of information systems and incorporated in national and international standards. The vulnerability does not apply to PKCS #1-based secure messaging protocols, such as Secure Electronic Transactions (SET) and Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (S/MIME) because they are not susceptible to, or already implement mechanisms preventing this potential vulnerability. A technical overview of the attack and recommended countermeasures for installed SSL-based server software are available now on the RSA Labs Web site at http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/. Software developers interested in testing their products for this potential vulnerability should visit RSA's site at http://www.rsa.com where they can find diagnostic instructions and prescriptive information for updating their applications. In July, RSA plans to provide developers using the company's BSAFE security suite with free software enhancements designed to eliminate this threat. RSA Laboratories plans to release for comment a draft PKCS #1 v2 in July following a revision process that began early in the year. RSA Data Security, Inc. RSA Data Security, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: SDTI), is a leading supplier of software components that secure electronic data, with more than 300 million copies of RSA encryption and authentication technologies installed worldwide. RSA technologies are part of existing and proposed standards for the Internet and World Wide Web, ISO, ITU-T, ANSI, IEEE, and business, financial and electronic commerce networks around the globe. RSA develops and markets platform- independent security components and related developer kits and provides comprehensive cryptographic consulting services. RSA can be reached at http://www.rsa.com. All products and companies mentioned herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holdings and are hereby recognized. SOURCE RSA Data Security, Inc. -0- 06/26/98 /CONTACT: Patrick Corman, Corman Communications, 650-326-9648, patrick(a)cormancom.com/ /Web site: http://www.rsa.com/ (SDTI) CO: RSA Data Security, Inc. ST: California IN: CPR SU: -0- (PRN) Jun/26/98 07:03 EOS (PRN) Jun/26/98 07:04 86 -0- (PRN) Jun/26/ 98 7:19

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - June 26, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

============================================= Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. CALEA Summit being held July 21 & 22 in Washington, DC. Register Now!! Call (202) 785-0081 =============================================

1 0

?
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 6/26/98 1:23 PM John Young I wonder what the effect of all of the like http://www.jya.com/rsa-pkcs1.htm and other materials you have posted at http://www.jya.com/crypto.htm are going to be on those controlling the money? Some key congressmen and their advisors. Crypto, in my mind, represents pseudomathematics at its finest. Also, the guy that is going to break-in will do it before encryption or after decryption. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm Or, of course, TRANSMIT THE KEY WITH THE CYPHERTEXT! My mind is getting back to finishing the digital FX - and revising my book! Morales and I do not know what to make of Mitchell's JUN 22 motion. But, with us now complaining to the Senate Judiciary Committee, WITH HARD DOCKET EVIDENCE of wrongdoing life for lawyers is now more complicated. I will respond to the JUN 22 motion about next Wednesday. Won't be hard. This is an INSIDE JOB. I KNOW where the documents are since I know the AUTHORS. No search is required. This should be settled before it gets WORSE. Later bill http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Subject: Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 13:29:01 -0600 From: bill payne <billp(a)nmol.com> To: art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov, senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov, chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov, senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov, senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov, info(a)kyl.senate.gov, senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov, john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov, michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov, senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov, senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov, senator(a)biden.senate.gov, senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov, senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov, russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov, dick(a)durbin.senate.gov, senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov CC: steve dillingham <" Steven.Dillingham"@hq.doe.gov>, Robert Nordhaus <" Robert.Nordhaus"@hq.doe.gov>, mrgall(a)ix.netcom.com, jy(a)jya.com, art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, federico pena <" Federico.F.Pena"@hq.doe.gov>, RJPARK(a)sandia.gov, cypherpunks(a)toad.com, ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

Lucent Researcher Cracks PKCS#1, SSL
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/pkcs1/ http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/zdnn_display/0,3440,332372,00.html Lucent researcher cracks encryption code By Margaret Kane, ZDNet An encryption researcher has discovered a software flaw that could allow a hacker to break the software codes used for electronic commerce. The problem protocols use the Public Key Cryptography Standard #1, including the Secure Sockets Layer, or SSL standard. RSA Data Security Inc., which defined the standard, said that the vulnerability does not apply to PKCS #1-based secure messaging protocols, such as Secure Electronic Transactions and Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension because they are not susceptible to -- and already implement -- mechanisms preventing this potential vulnerability. But at a Web site using SSL, a hacker could break the code by sending millions of messages to the target server and observing the server's response. That information could be used to decode an intercepted session, said Daniel Bleichenbacher, a researcher at Lucent Technologies Inc.'s (Nasdaq:LU) Bell Labs. A slew of software companies announced today that they are working on a patch for the problem, and will post it on their Web sites. RSA, a division of Security Dynamics Technologies, (Nasdaq:SDTI) said it is working with IBM (Nasdaq:IBM), Microsoft Corp.(Nasdaq:MSFT), Netscape Communications Corp. (Nasdaq:NSCP), Open Market Inc. (Nasdaq:OMKT), and others on the problem. RSA is also working with the CERT Coordination Center on the problem, which has posted a technical advisory about the situation. Reuters contributed to this story. ++++++++++++++++++ Extracted From Another web page there m+++++++++++++ http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/zdnn_display/0,3440,332372,00.html SSL flaw could expose encrypted data A researcher at Lucent Technologies Inc.'s Bell Laboratories has discovered a vulnerability in the SSL encryption commonly used in electronic commerce transactions. The flaw, which has been exposed only in a laboratory setting, would allow a hacker to capture encrypted data in a session between a browser and server. The vulnerability is hardly a fatal flaw in SSL (Secure Sockets Layer). Rather, it's a hole that a savvy Web site administrator should be able to spot before a hacker can do any damage. "The good news here is that you still have to be pretty smart to break it," said Julie Ferguson, chief technology officer of ClearCommerce Corp., in Austin, Texas. The researcher, Daniel Bleichenbacher, who works in the secure systems research department of Bell Labs, in Murray Hill, N.J., found a way for a hacker to derive the session key used in a transaction by feeding off the error messages created by a server. First, the hacker must prepare roughly 1 million messages to send against the server to capture the information. Bleichenbacher said he created an algorithm that analyzes those messages and derives the session key--which is randomly generated for each transaction by a combination of public and private keys at the Web site and the consumer's browser. Still, a competent site administrator should notice that his Web site has suddenly received a barrage of bad messages. "It should be very easy to see that an attack is taking place," Bleichenbacher said. The hacker would also have to capture a session at some point on the line, likely at an Internet service provider, not knowing whether there is information within it that is worth stealing. Because a session key is randomly generated for each session, it's possible for a hacker to capture information only about that individual session, said officials at RSA Data Security Inc., which developed SSL in conjunction with Netscape Communications Corp. The flaw, technically found in the standard called the Public Key Cryptography System #1, does not apply to encryption algorithms themselves but rather to the way packets are placed into encrypted envelopes. PKCS#1 is due to be upgraded next month, and the latest revision will account for the newly found vulnerability, said Scott Schnell, vice president of marketing at RSA, in Redwood City, Calif. The implications are perhaps most serious for home banking, because a hacker using this flaw could capture a user's banking information. Although there are no known real-world attacks taking advantage of this SSL flaw, software vendors promise to have patches that mask the error messages. Netscape, in Mountain View, Calif., already has one available on its Web site for several applications, including Netscape Enterprise Server, Netscape Proxy Server and the company's messaging servers. Microsoft Corp. also has created a fix that masks the error messages that a hacker would rely upon. Officials of the Redmond, Wash., company said they have worked with Netscape to ensure that their respective fixes do not create interoperability problems. Both companies said they have already alerted major customers about the problem and provided them with fixes. Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart(a)pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

1 0

BeyondPress 4.0 from Extensis
by listmaster＠extensis.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Announcing Extensis BeyondPress 4.0 The Award-winning Quark-to-HTML XTension from Extensis http://www.extensis.com/BeyondPress_P * Convert Quark to HTML & DHTML with one click * Compatible with QuarkXPress 3.31 & 4.0 * Receive PhotoAnimator FREE! with each copy of BeyondPress Extensis BeyondPress 4.0 is the latest version of our award-winning XTension that takes your Quark documents to the web - in no time. BeyondPress preserves the layout of your Quark documents in HTML tables or DHTML for cutting-edge design. Create animated GIFs with your FREE copy of Extensis PhotoAnimator (a $99 value). Then drag the animated GIFs into your Quark layout and see them displayed live inside QuarkXPress. Plus, add hyperlinks, image maps, and more - right in QuarkXPress. Extensis BeyondPress - It's the best way to take Quark to the Web. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Order BeyondPress 4.0 for only $499.95 AND get Extensis PhotoAnimator - FREE! (a $99 value) To order or receive more information please visit: http://www.extensis.com/BeyondPress_P Or phone: 1-800-796-9798 or (503) 274-2020 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BeyondPress is available immediately for Macintosh users. BeyondPress for Windows will be available later this Summer. BeyondPress is 100% compatible with Quark XPress 3.31 & 4.0. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PS. We have made every effort to ensure this message is being sent only to people who have expressed interest in Extensis products. If we have sent this to you in error, please accept our apologies and reply with "REMOVE" in the subject line for automatic exclusion from future communications. If you know someone who would like to be on our mailing list have them send an email to listmaster(a)extensis.com with "ADD" in the subject line and their email address in the body.

1 0

Wooden sculpture
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 6/26/98 7:44 PM John Young I am reading http://www.jya.com/gak-fails.htm Tonight I retrieved a wooden sculpture given to me by numerical analyst LINPACK http://av.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=linpack&z=2&hc=0&hs=0 Richard Hanson. That's him! http://www.vni.com/products/imsl/hanson.html Hanson gave me the sculpture in about 1978. Hanson and I have been colleagues for about 25 years. I will forward it to you. With initials on the bottom. And, of course, YOU must pass on the sculpture to the NEXT DESERVING. Our buddies aren't happy about what happened. http://www.wpiran.org/ Allahu akbar ... and keep up wind. Until we get SETTLMENT, of course. Settlment must include support payments for Iranian mothers who lost sons in the Iraq/Iran war, retirement benfits for them, health insurance and a LETTER OF APOLOGY. All paid for by NSA and the CIA. We are ALL working for settlment. bill http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html

1 0

RSA Material on PKCS#1 Crack
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The attack: ftp://ftp.rsa.com/pub/pdfs/bulletn7.pdf 4-page PDF file. There's also a Postscript version available. The paper is by Bleichenbacher of Lucent and Burt Kaliski and Jessica Staddon of RSA Labs. OEM Countermeasures: http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/pkcs1/oem_counter.html (below) Countermeasures for Users of Servers: http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/pkcs1/countermeasures.html (below - it's pointers to vendor home pages, pleasantly including C2. Apparently they've done a good job coordinating it...) Q&A : http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/pkcs1/qa.html ====== RSA to Provide OEM Customers with Guidelines and Technology to Thwart Potential Web Server Security Attack OAEP Formatting Adds Important Security to Vulnerable Applications June 26, 1998 -- RSA Data Security, Inc. today announced guidelines to assist its OEM customers in both assessing their products vulnerability to a newly discovered potential security attack, and to identify pre-emptive countermeasures to thwart such an attack. The guidelines are designed to help developers understand the nature and mechanism of the threat, pose a series of technical questions to identify vulnerable constructs in the developers software design, and provide a set of countermeasures from which to choose based on the developers needs. These guidelines are available online at http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/. The potential threat affects server products that employ an interactive key establishment protocol in conjunction with the PKCS #1 standard for digital envelopes, including SSL-based servers. SET (Secure Electronic Transaction) and other secure messaging protocols, such as S/MIME (Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension), are not susceptible to or already implement mechanisms preventing this potential attack. Recent research by cryptographer Daniel Bleichenbacher of the Bell Labs Secure Systems Research Department, the research and development arm of Lucent Technologies, indicate that the above combination is potentially vulnerable to a class of attack known as Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attacks. The potential attack noted by Mr. Bleichenbacher relies on sending a target server on the order of a million carefully constructed messages and observing variations in the servers response. As such, the attack is both detectable and can be prevented with countermeasures. For some developers, the most effective countermeasure is incorporation of the Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding (OAEP) technology, a method of formatting an encrypted message so that attackers cannot learn information about the contents through repeated probing. OAEP is designed to thwart a variety of attacks, including the Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack. For other developers, the most effective countermeasure will be preventing an assailant from gaining information from messages returned from their server. RSAs guidelines provide design information for developers to use in implementing this form of countermeasure as well. RSA Laboratories, the research arm of RSA, plans to include OAEP in the next version of PKCS #1, a widely used cryptography standard, that will be available as a draft for comment in July. PKCS #1 is used in SSL and other popular security mechanisms to provide confidentiality for exchange of symmetric encryption keys (digital envelopes), as well as to construct digital signatures. OAEP has already been integrated into RSAs newest release of BSAFE 4.0, the companys flagship cryptographic security development suite which began shipping this month. RSA intends to make available OAEP updates conforming to the new PKCS #1 specification for its BSAFE 3.0 and 4.0 products in July, and to incorporate OAEP in an upcoming version of JSAFE, RSAs security engine for Java. RSA recommends that developers target these upcoming OAEP updates for inclusion in their products. Check this site for more information on OAEP updates in the coming weeks. RSAs Website will also host links to vendors sites where countermeasures are made available as a service to both OEMs and end customers. See RSAs related announcement on this subject. Currently, the following vendor information Website links are available: C2Net Software, Inc. http://www.c2.net Consensus Development Corporation http://www.consensus.com/ssl-rsa.html IBM Corporation http://www.ibm.com/security Lotus Development Corporation http://www.lotus.com/security Microsoft Corporation http://www.microsoft.com/security Netscape Communications Corporation http://www.netscape.com Open Market, Inc. http://www.openmarket.com/security/ RSA Data Security, Inc. http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs An RSA Labs technical paper discussing this vulnerability, as well as additional information, is available on RSAs Website, http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs. ============ SSL Countermeasures These countermeasures enhance the security of popular Internet servers and software products based on the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol. The countermeasures are available from respective vendors' Web sites, and include configuration guidelines, software updates where applicable and additional information. Currently available vendor information may be found at the following sites: Aventail Corporation http://www.aventail.com/ C2Net Software, Inc. http://www.c2.net/ Consensus Development Corporation http://www.consensus.com/ Lotus Development Corporation http://www.lotus.com/security IBM Corporation http://www.ibm.com/security/ Microsoft Corporation http://www.microsoft.com/security/ Netscape Communications Corporation http://help.netscape.com/products/server/ssldisc overy/index.html Open Market, Inc. http://www.openmarket.com/security/ RSA Data Security, Inc. http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/ Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart(a)pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

1 0

WORRIED ABOUT HIS OR HER BACKGROUND?
by lee7＠msn.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR="#ff0080">INFORMATION USA Your Source For Information LOCATE Business & Individuals in the USA Old Friends, Lost Loved Ones, Dead Beat Parents, Debtors Assets Local, State, National & International Information needed varies, sometimes just a name. Helpful information would be Last Known Address, Social Security Number, Date of Birth and any other information you feel would be of use. Provide us with everything you have and let the Professionals at Information USA do the rest. Information USA has the most competitive prices in the industry! Call today for a free price quote. Other Services Available *Criminal Background *Civil Court Records *Bankruptcy & Liens & Judgments *National Real Property *Business Credit Reports *Corporate Profiles *National Bank Asset Information *Stocks & Bonds & Mutual Fund Search *Safe Deposit Box Search *Social Security Death Records *Marriage & Divorce *Workers Compensation Records *Non-Published Numbers *Drivers License Records *Vehicle Records Search *Water & Aircraft Search *Pre-Trial Comprehensive Reports *Pre-Employment Background *Verify Education *Verify Professional License *Verify Employment Call for additional Services Information USA Call Toll Free 1-888-370-9112 Ask for Ken Wagner Visa, MasterCard & Discover Cards Accepted </HTML>

1 0