December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Valentine Suprise
by William R. Butler 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Yes you are prob. right but I do get a little burned about it in my mail all the time. ----Original Message Follows---- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:00:46 -0500 To: "William R. Butler" <wrb(a)hotmail.com> From: Michael Elder <melder(a)descartes.coker.edu> Subject: Re: Valentine Suprise Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com,celeste@seeme.com At 05:28 AM 2/24/98 PST, William R. Butler wrote: >FUCK-OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >************************ ... >Me and my friends are so lonely!! >I wish that you would come and see me. >With Valentines day coming I don't want to be alone. >I will do anything to make you happy, >if you want me to I'll even invite a friend over to join us. >Just PLEASE don't let me be alone! >I'll be awaiting for you every night. >I'll be at: http://www.cyber-fantasy.com/ > I think that was the point of the advertisement d=] -E. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

Pentagon Papers
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From William "Grumpy-pie" Geiger III Tue Feb 24 11:46:52 1998 > > >Didn't the Pentagon Papers make it out? > > What did it change? NOTHING My vague understanding of the matter is that it was an important US Supreme Court case involving free speech and prior restraint thereof. ---guy

1 0

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk Tue Feb 24 14:56:22 1998 > > Guy <guy(a)panix.com> writes: > > > Has 'cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net' replaced 'cypherpunks(a)toad.com'? > > Er, yes, some time ago now. cypherpunks(a)toad.com is no longer, and > that mail to it gets through is just that toad.com feeds what it gets > back to cyberpass.net. The others replacements are algebra.com, and > ssz.com. Well, toad.com should stop accepting subscription requests. > You said elsewhere in your expose your claim that Dimitri forged posts > as from you that he used a remailer. So how can you have traffic > analysis showing that it was him, and secondly how do you know it even > was him. Because he posted under his own name ~"Chris Lewis should die", etc, and it matches up with the death threat. He is massively on record in his own name for stalking Chris Lewis, and contacting Chris Lewis at the same address. It was good enough for legal counsel. ---guy Plus the easily documented job-stalking of various people.

1 0

[Q: Information on PhD Cryptography Classes]
by sunder 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I got this request sent to me directly. If you have info for this person please reply directly to: balakrik(a)goldey.gbc.edu. To: SUNDER(a)brainlink.com Subject: Information on Cryptography From: Karthik Balakrishnan <balakrik(a)goldey.gbc.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 11:45:26 -0500 To introduce myself, I am Karthik Balakrishnan, a senior majoring in Computer Information Systems. I should be graduating at the end of th Fall semester. I am planning to pursue my Master's in Cryptography, probably try for PhD program. I would really appretiate your help in guiding me through this proces by giving me some advice on this, as to which schools offer a PhD in this field, the schools that you recommend, and how to go about this process. My e-mail address is : balakrik(a)goldey,gbc.edu Thank you very much.

1 0

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From jya(a)pipeline.com Tue Feb 24 16:06:28 1998 > > Guy, > > Without defending Dimitri's actions I'd like to check that > he's not suffered a Jim Bell snatch, perhaps unrelated > to your complaint. PSINet snatcheroo? That's getting tough on complaints. ;-) I've only submitted a complaint to PSINet so far. Haven't gotten around to Altopia. I do actually work for a living, despite Vulis' claims. He posted from 'cj3(a)alt.net' _after_ being terminated from PSINet. > He's not answered his phone since > you announced the unplug, nor answered e-mail (to dm.com, > which is no longer active). > > Do you have any info on who I could contact for leads? > Or can you refer this to someone who does? I've only got > the phone number listed in his sig. Whois gives his number as: Billing Contact: Vulis, Dimitri (DV1010) dlv(a)DM.COM 718-261-6839 > BTW, I'm in Manhattan. Vox: 212-873-8700. Ain't it great here in NYC, Third Planet From the Sun? You could always go over and knock on his door. I hear he posted a picture of himself to the Net in 1992, and that "he looked dorky, and his wife fat". Hey, Vulis is probably looking for a real job. Maybe he's finally found one. I can hear him saying: "Would you like fries with that?" ---guy

2 1

Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 18:49:25 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dr I. D. Goodyer" <goodyer(a)well.ox.ac.uk> To: ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk Subject: Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto >From http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,19388,00.html I hope that this isn't too American for us the majority on this list. I thought that it was relevant. See original webpage for hyperlinks. Ian Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto By Courtney Macavinta Staff Writer, CNET NEWS.COM February 23, 1998, 2:40 p.m. PT A bipartisan group of politicos, high-tech companies, and privacy advocates will announce a broad coalition next week to overturn the White House's current encryption policy through a million-dollar media blitz and lobbying campaign, CNET's NEWS.COM has learned. Encryption secures digital communications, rendering it unreadable if intercepted. The technology is the center of a U.S. debate with federal law enforcement officials asking Congress for access to the "keys" that unlock encrypted data on one side, and consumer groups and industry representatives arguing that such provisions make encryption products useless and constitute an invasion of privacy. The formation of the coalition--Americans for Computer Privacy--signals a shift in the diligent, but Beltway-confined, fight against the White House's crypto stance. The players in the coalition will attempt to force encryption policy on the mainstream radar by convincing Americans that the government has plans to read their private digital discourse. "This will be an effort with very major financial backing, and this effort will be joined by a breathtaking coalition of interests," Jack Quinn, the coalition's legal adviser, told CNET's NEWS.COM today. Quinn is a senior partner with Arnold & Porter in Washington and is a former counsel to President Clinton. "I think people will understand that the FBI director's [Louis Freeh] proposal for domestic encryption controls is really like asking them to make a duplicate of their front door key and leave it at the post office in case he wants to get inside...I don't think it will be hard to explain," he added. The coalition includes the Business Software Alliance, which will be just one of the financial backers, the trade group confirmed today. The hired guns to head up the coalition's strategy and media campaign also include Ed Gillespie, president of Policy Impact Communications and the strategist behind the Republican's sweeping 1994 legislative package known as the Contract with America; and the firm of Goddard-Claussen, which is best known for creating the famous "Harry and Louise" commercials that helped defeat the president's health care reform initiative the same year. In addition, Mindshare Internet Campaigns will be in charge of the online strategy and Web site for the coalition, with the Dittus Group in charge of public relations. Recruiting pamphlets with scant details about the coalition's membership, but with clearly laid out goals, already were circulated at the Computers, Freedom, and Privacy conference in Austin, Texas, last week. These forces and other yet-to-be named members of the coalition will try in about 50 calendar days remaining in Congress's session to derail legislation already on the table that they say will prevent private online communication. The group will fight an FBI-backed plan that would require all federally funded computers to store encryption keys with a government-approved party, allowing law enforcement to unscramble documents without users' knowledge or even a court order in some cases. "Even if you don't have a PC at your home or office, still there is information about you that is computerized; maybe it's your medical or financial records. We want to make sure that the technology that can keep that information private stays that way," said Tom McMahon, a spokesman for the coalition, which officially will launch next Wednesday. In addition, the Americans for Computer Privacy will ramp up an ongoing battle to overturn Clinton administration regulations prohibiting the export of strong encryption products unless the codes are made available to law enforcement agencies. A bill know as the SAFE Act was the vehicle for this export relief, but at least one version of the bill altered by the House Intelligence Committee would grant law enforcement access to encrypted protected communication in the United States. (See related story) "BSA is involved in this broader coalition of users, industry, and privacy groups. We are coming together to push for a policy that is based on a voluntary, market-based system that is based on consumer demand vs. the government's demand to access your communication in a way that is unprecedented and violates privacy," said Kim Willard, a spokeswoman for the BSA. The media campaign is expected to cost more than $1 million and will continue over the next eight months. The goal is to stimulate grassroots action against the bills that add more controls on cryptography. At the same time, the coalition's political heavyweights will be working with Congress members to secure a victory. "They clearly want to get this out to broader public audiences and move outside the Beltway to focus on what the public has at stake in this the debate," said Richard Claussen, whose firm will work on the TV campaign. "The indication is that we want to move pretty aggressively on this."

1 0

Cryptobook: State of the Art in '98?
by andrew fabbro 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I finally got around to building a cryptobook, as Joel McNamara described at http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm/cryptbk.html Being cool cypherpunk types, you already know that I'm referring to a computer that has an encrypted partition, is tricked out with cryptoware, and has been modified to prevent data leakage as much as possible (e.g., the OS swaps on the encrypted drive, the fact that it's a cryptobook is somewhat concealed, etc.) Joel's excellent article is two years old. I'm wondering if anyone can improve upon it, as there is at least one near-showstopper problem. (FYI, I'm using Win95 as a platform for various reasons, mostly because the data I'm encrypting is Win95-based and Joels' guide is Intel-based): (*) SecureDrive is recommended as a hard drive encryption product. Unfortunately, it's 16-bit and designed for DOS. On my laptop, which (as is typical) only has one hard drive controller, in order to mount the partition in 16-bit mode, I have to turn off all 32-bit disk access, which slows everything down a great deal, means loading a 16-bit CD-ROM driver, etc. Little things like animated icons also don't work -- yes, who cares, but it suggests there are probably other side effects. My winGeek friends don't think there is a way to mount one partition in 16-bit mode and the other in 32-bit mode. I'm wondering if anyone knows of 32-bit program like SecureDrive, preferably one using IDEA, that would be a worthwhile replacement. (FYI, another package of the same generation, SecureDevice, has the same problems). (*) Anyone care to recommend anything that is not included in Joel's list? Maybe new or better products since '96? I'd particularly be interested in some way of automating some of the manual things Joel proposes -- secure deletions, steganography, etc. Sorry, I'm a UNIX geek and am somewhat lost in Windows land... Thanks all, -- Andrew Fabbro [afabbro(a)umich.edu] www-personal.umich.edu/~afabbro "Solutions are not answers to problems." -- Richard Nixon

1 0

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk Tue Feb 24 18:55:45 1998 > > Guy writes <guy(a)panix.com>: > > Hey, Vulis is probably looking for a real job. > > > > Maybe he's finally found one. > > I hear he already had one: he's a lecturer at a University in new york > (not sure of names of NY universitys), unless your actions lead > indirectly to his contract being terminated. # http://math.harvard.edu/~verbit/scs/cranks/from-Shlomo.html # # Q: Who is Dimitri Vulis? # # A: Dimitri is an XSoviet immigrant. # # He harasses people all over the net with the most offensive sorts of messages, # and uses dirty tricks to retaliate to the people who do get offended. Among # his accomplished feats is a series of articles about cat-eating dogs posted to # rec.pets.cats (which caused a wave of complaints and made him lost his CUNY # account) ; a series of porno binaries with obscene comments about his # opponents posted to math-related newsgroups (he lost another academic account, # at fordham.edu, after this scandal); # [ # 8/3/97 http://corky.fordham.edu/fclc/faculty.html # Dimitri Vulis, Adjunct Instructor in Computer Science. BA, MA, CUNY # Dimitri: I haven't been teaching at Fordham for a few years. # It's too far and the pay's too low. # ] # ...and a series of racist articles denigrating all aspects of romanian life # and culture which used to haunt the romanian newsgroup for years. ---- > From aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk Tue Feb 24 18:55:45 1998 > > Guy writes <guy(a)panix.com>: > > He posted from 'cj3(a)alt.net' _after_ being terminated from PSINet. > > You sure? I mean it could as easily as not been someone spoofing him, > what with the various anonymous mails, etc., that you reported. It is a blatant obviousity. Traffic analysis simply means convincing one or more people that it's the same person... ---guy Convinced? # Subject: (none) # From: Mix <mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com> # Date: 1998/02/12 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # Timothy Mayhem will fuck anything that moves, # but he'd rather be fucking his own mother's dead # body. # # <<<< # o(0-0)o # -ooO-(_) Ooo-- Timothy Mayhem # # Subject: Archie Plutonium's contributions to science # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1996/11/28 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,soc.culture.scientists,alt.flame # # May the force of 231Pu be with you. Archie Plutonium proves a way to list all # solutions to Diophantine equations! # # <<<< # o(0-0)o # -ooO-(_) Ooo-- Archie Plutonium # Subject: [ADMINISTRATIVIUM] Firewalls # From: nobody(a)replay.com (Anonymous) # Date: 1998/01/13 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # Timmy C. Mayonnaise's reheated, refurbished, and regurgitated # cud is completely inappropriate for the mailing lists into which # it is cross-ruminated. # # ,,, # -ooO(o o)Ooo- Timmy C. Mayonnaise # (_) # # Subject: Ludwig Plutonium's latest contributions to number theory # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1997/02/02 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,talk.rumors,misc.invest.options # # Praise the Lord! Ludwig Plutonium proved that some non-trivial # zeroes of the zeta function have real part not equal to 1/2. # # ,,, # -ooO(o o)Ooo- Ludwig Plutonium # (_) # Subject: (none) # From: Anonymous <anon(a)anon.efga.org> # Date: 1997/12/19 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # Timmy C. May will fuck anything that moves, # but he'd rather be fucking his own mother's # dead body. # # /''' # c-OO Timmy C. May # \ # - # # Subject: Ludwig Plutonium, our greatest scientist # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1997/02/20 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,soc.culture.scientists,sci.physics.accelerators # # Reposted without permission from clari.plutonium. Ludwig Plutonium # demonstrates that (a+b)^n=a^n+b^n for some a, b, and n! # # /''' # c-OO Ludwig Plutonium # \ # - # Subject: Re: Zero-knowledge commit # From: nobody(a)replay.com (Anonymous) # Date: 1998/02/01 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # # Timmy C[unt] May carries a turd in his wallet for identification purposes. # # __| \ / |__ # _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ Timmy C[unt] May # /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ # ___|_\______ _____/_|__ # # # Subject: Expressing America's appreciation for Archimedes Uranium # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1996/11/01 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.bio.misc # # We live in interesting times. Archimedes Uranium proved beyond all # doubt that 6 and 28 are the sums of their proper divisors respectively! # # __| \ / |__ # _ o ___\o \o | o/ o/___ o _ # /\ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ /\ # ___|_\______ _____/_|__ # Subject: Secure checksums # From: nobody(a)replay.com (Anonymous) # Date: 1998/01/31 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # Timmy May sits at his terminal dressed in five-inch # stiletto heels, fishnet stockings, a gold-lame # mini-skirt, a purple halter with girdle underneath to # keep in his flabby gut, a Fredericks of Hollywood # padded bra also underneath the halter, a cheap Naomi # Sims pink afro wig, waiting to yank his crank whenever # a black man responds to one of his inane rants. # # o \ o / _ o __| \ / |__ o _ \ o / o # /|\ | /\ ___\o \o | o/ o/__ /\ | /|\ Timmy May # / \ / \ | \ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ / | / \ / \ # # # Subject: Archimedes Transplutonium, Dartmouth's most respected authority on number theory # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1996/12/20 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,misc.test,sci.physics.accelerators # # Praise the Lord! Archimedes Transplutonium proved beyond all # doubt the non-existence of infinitely many primes. # # o \ o / _ o __| \ / |__ o _ \ o / o # /|\ | /\ ___\o \o | o/ o/__ /\ | /|\ Archimedes Transplutonium # / \ / \ | \ /) | ( \ /o\ / ) | (\ / | / \ / \ # Subject: (none) # From: Anonymous <anon(a)anon.efga.org> # Date: 1998/01/26 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # Timothy May prefers to have sex with little kids # because his own penis is like that of a # three-year-old. # # /\**/\ # ( o_o )_) Timothy May # ,(u u ,), # {}{}{}{}{}{} # # Subject: Ludwig Pohlmann, Internet's biggest genius # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1997/02/05 # Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.techniques.testing.misc,misc.test # # May the force of 231Pu be with you. Ludwig Pohlmann proved beyond # reasonable doubt the existence of even numbers cannot be represented as a # sum of two primes. # # /\**/\ # ( o_o )_) Ludwig Pohlmann # ,(u u ,), # {}{}{}{}{}{} # Subject: (none) # From: Mix <mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com> # Date: 1998/01/27 # Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks # # The only `culture' Timothy `C' Maypole possesses is that # cultivated from his foreskin scrapings. # # ,/ \, # ((__,-,,,-,__)), Timothy `C' Maypole # `--)~ ~(--` # .-'( )`-, # `~~`d\ /b`~~` # | | # (6___6) # `---` # # Subject: Re: renaming soc.culture.russian.moderated => soc.culture.smegma.moderated # From: simvlad(a)bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) # Date: 1996/02/25 # Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.soviet,soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.romanian,soc\ # .culture.african.american,ok.general # # The only "culture" Pyotr Vorobiev and his buddies possess is the bacterial one, # cultivated from their foreskin scrapings. # # This posting was generated by an artificial intelligence program.

2 1

Re: ascii art is not a digital signature (Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?)
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk Wed Feb 25 04:19:12 1998 > > Guy <guy(a)panix.com> writes: > > > From aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk Tue Feb 24 18:55:45 1998 > > > > > > You sure? I mean it could as easily as not been someone spoofing him, > > > what with the various anonymous mails, etc., that you reported. > > > > It is a blatant obviousity. > > > > [series of ascii art posts posted via different remailer addresses, > > and bwalk.dm.com email addresses] > > It is not at all obvious. You seem to be under the illusion that an > ascii art image is some kind of digital signature. You seem to think people couldn't share a digital signature. > > Traffic analysis simply means convincing one or more people > > that it's the same person... > > Doesn't prove anything. Sure it does, I've proven that with PSI. Guess what happens if those people are a jury? > Here to make the point, I'll use one of your magic digital signature > ascii arts which somehow proves incontrovertably that the post was > made by Dimitri. I can see that one flew over your head, and pooped on you. ---guy

1 0

No Subject
by Trei, Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 23:38:58 -0600 From: David McNett <nugget(a)slacker.com> To: rc5(a)lists.distributed.net Subject: [RC5] [ADMIN] The secret message is... Sender: owner-rc5(a)llamas.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rc5(a)llamas.net Status: RO --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Once again I have the great privilege of coming to you with good news. It is with great pleasure (and a sigh of relief) that I can now inform you that the DES-II-1 challenge has been successfully met by distributed.net. The winning key to the challenge was detected and submitted to RSA Labs at 02:26 GMT on Monday, 23-Feb-1998. The correct key, 76 9E 8C D9 F2 2F 5D EA, revealed the words which we've been anticipating these past 39 days: "The secret message is: Many hands make light work." (If you ask me, this is a nice nod in our direction. Thanks, RSA Labs!) In addition to proving that 56-bit DES is no longer sufficient for protecting valuable information, we've now also proved that blind luck need not be a factor in brute-force decryption attacks. The original DES Challenge and the more recent RC5-56 wins were fortunate and did not have to sweep a significant portion of the keyspace. This time around, however, we managed to complete almost 90% of the keyspace and have now proven that even when the law of averages chooses to catch up to us and forces us to pay our dues, we are still an unstoppable force. Our collective victory is all the more impressive when you consider what we had to accomplish to achieve it. We tested sixty-three quadrillion keys. That number is simply staggering. Assuming *0* growth between now and July, we'll be able to sweep the entire DES-II-2 keyspace in just under 29 days. That's assuming that we do not recruit another person, don't add any more machines, and are even more unlucky next time. I daresay at least one of those assumptions is probably false. I'd invite all of you to join us in IRC (efnet, #distributed) for a rowdy victory party. Take a breather. Sit back and watch your clients automatically roll over to RC5-64. The only other issue at hand is *who* found the key. The person who found the winning key has politely asked to remain anonymous. Rest assured, I've been in contact with them and they know they've won. They will be receiving their full share of the prize and are quite excited about the victory. All I'd ask is that we all respect this person's wishes and not bother the list with public speculation as to their identity. I'm sure we all appreciate just how important privacy and anonymity can be. Here are some numbers to chew on while the stats are down: Project statistics: Start of contest: January 13, 1998 at 09:00 PST Start of distributed.net effort: January 13, 1998 at 09:08 PST End of Contest: February 23, 1998 at 02:26 PST Size of keyspace: 72,057,594,037,927,936 Approximate keys tested: 63,686,000,000,000,000 Number of 2^30 (average) keyblocks: 67,108,864 Number of keys in average keyblock: 1,073,741,824 Peak blocks per day: 5,540,982 Peak keys per second: 34,430,460,000 The unencrypted message: Many hands make light work Computing equivalents: Distributed.net is equivalent in processing power to: 11,264 DEC Alpha 21064 533s 15,316 Sun Ultra I 167s 22,393 Intel Pentium II 333s 68,859 Macintosh PowerPC 604e/200s. 41,712 Intel Pentium 166s 399,374 Intel 486DX2/66s 7,446,033 Intel 386SX/20s (based solely on DES client performance) Prospective: If Keys were dollars, we could pay off the U.S. National Debt in 6.25 minutes If Keys were pennies, we could buy 536249385 Mazda Miatas each day. If Keys were pennies, we could buy 256728249 Jeep Cherokees each day! If you printed a single page to represent each key block as it was checked and placed those pages in a stack, it would grow 12.83 inches taller every minute. If blocks were liters of Dr. Pepper, we could produce 6381493 six-packs each day If Key Blocks were cheeseburgers, fries, and a large Dr. Pepper, we could feed the entire city of Toronto, Ontario lunch each day. (on a personal note, It sure feels nice to be doing RC5 blocks again. I feel like I've just slipped on an old, comfortable pair of loafers that were lost in the attic for two months) -- ________________________________________________________________________ |David McNett |To ensure privacy and data integrity this message has| |nugget(a)slacker.com|been encrypted using dual rounds of ROT-13 encryption| |Birmingham, AL USA|Please encrypt all important correspondence with PGP!| --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNPOucPqEj3HEBeehAQEKBgQAizpn1SrmYhz/Ycx1aNUxewi9r7X8gRTr ifuwC+4qAJXWcDOesdOx1V1IzQ6eSHLFuiaDyLsNmUwIoUpwJm0CTlmwtYIDDc4R mGrO7t0FUne+l+YhFyYJTarnMjmCpySJjEf9I/GNrWfGTnFAWAaaGQp+f1ZyBTkJ 1bDtm3rzbjk= =iv/8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- -- To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe rc5' to majordomo(a)lists.distributed.net rc5-digest subscribers replace rc5 with rc5-digest

1 0