December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Pauline Hanson's One Nation May 1998 Newsletter
by Global Web Builders 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Issue 1.9, May 1998 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: No unsolicited email is sent. If you do not want to be on the mailing list please say "REMOVE" in the subject line and return this message in the body. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear One Nation supporter in New South Wales, It is now becoming extremely important that you make your desire to help One Nation in the upcoming Federal election known to your local branch. Your local contact (by email or phone) can be seen at the following URL: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/federal/become.htm Please let these key people know how you can help, whether it be by assisting in mail drops or manning polling booths. We need your help! During the last six weeks we have, as a political party, reached many milestones. These milestones, covered on the Internet, include: - One Nation's birthday party at my farm on April 11th See: http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/history/day1.html for coverage and images. - the launch of the One Nation Federal Web site: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/federal There have also been a number of press releases on a range of issues. These can be seen at: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/press You might not be aware that negotiation on the MAI (multilateral agreement on investment) has been delayed, not stopped. See this URL for my press release on the MAI: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/press/010598.html For more information on this secret international treaty, visit: http://www.gwb.com.au/mai.html Finally, we need your financial assistance. We are not going to get the big business million dollar donations like the major parties. We depend on YOU to help us to promote the image and policies of this party at the upcoming Federal election. Please assist if and where you can. There is an on-line donation form at: http://www.gwb.com.au/pledge.html Regards, Pauline Hanson

1 0

Spam
by StanSqncrs 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi cyphers, I'm back. A certain 'nobody' invited me! ;-) Apparently only as far back as 1993, the definition of the word "spam" from the on-line jargon file was this (according to the New Hackers Dictionary) - spam [from the MUD community] vt. To crash a program by over-running a fixed- size buffer with excessively large input data. See also Buffer Overflow, Overrun Screw, Smash the Stack. Obviously that definition has changed since then. I've seen it go from that to repetitive commercial advertising, and I've seen it used to brand someone as an outcast of a list for future removal simply because a small minority didn't like what that person had said (so it was being used at that time to mean 'objectional material'). And in all the times I've seen the word fly, there has never been anykind of volume that would come close to overblowing the forum's mechanical capabilities. So, I'm curious as to who/what dictated the meaning of that to change so drasticly. Write me in private if it's off-subject (and yes, you can write me anonomously if you don't want a response. :-) ) Also, new address for my website - Stan, Stan and the Sequencers http://members.aol.com/StanSqncrs/

1 0

Dog Log - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Toto 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dog Log - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!! _______________________________________ From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> To: Eric Otot <emc(a)wire.insync.net> Cc: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net Subject: Re: The Borg Arrive -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Eric Otot said: >So I have the choice of going somewhere inconvenient to >shop, shopping at Rite Aid and paying full MSRP for every >single item, which hardly any store sells stuff for, or >getting the incentivized mandatory/voluntary barcoded card, >and letting the Borg link me with everything I buy, down >to each and every sheet of toilet paper I use to >wipe my butt with. > >Beware the Borg. Coming soon to a neighborhood store near >you. > >P.S. I went with the card. So lets get this straight: You don't like a companies efforts to gather marketing statistics on its customers but due to your own *sloth* you not only continue to shop there but you also fill out the forms for them to track every purchase that you make! I am sorry but as hard as I try I can not generate the least bit of sympathy for you. Sheeple are sheeple because they act in the manner that you just outlined in your message. Bitch, whine and moan that the store tracks what brand of toilet paper they buy but if in exchange for $0.10 off 4 rolls and they will give up their entire life story. Sheep get sheered because they don't know any better, sheeple get sheered because they deserve it. ------------------------------------------------------------ William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgp.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Tag-O-Matic: I use OS/2 2.0 and I don't care who knows! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 ZZZCharset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNUp/Ko9Co1n+aLhhAQHRpwP+OVypg6sRgZMAqW6NmaTexoqoRt4z3zxK lhQ6HGvmDMxIGqdS5vPPHw+kZPjtJbkxAWamoi6EtOccbv/3otl2bjuFPNBNMYD+ p7nMAhdZDk1zsgiiUhSzp3ZcREcFIy8Ybnu6u4xYf/wgueg26cW+JE8A5iyeJMOz 6dHT6oBT2IE= =u1mU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- God bless WillyG III! Eric Otot wrote a reply to WGII's caustic post which gave a perfectly reasonable account of his preference for picking which 'battles' were worth his while to engage in, and which would be merely pissing in the wind of the masses rushing by to save their dime for the GreyHound restroom. I chose to omit EricO's reply and spell-correct WGIII's, in order to preserve the point made by his post, without lessening the post's effect by letting it be obvious that WG3 is an uneducated, redneck, barefoot hillbilly who has no 'manors'... I did so for the simple reason that Eric Otot's perfectly reasonable erudition of his postion on the imposition of identity-tracking techonlogy, although being a perfectly valid justification of the need for concentration of resources, is a position that millions or billions of perfectly reasonable people are capable of reasoning for themselves. Fuck 'reasonable'... Eric Cordian, a much wiser and more perceptive member of the CypherPunks list than Eric Otot, though less easily amused, elucidates one of the many reasons why it may be unreasonable to remain reasonable in one's reasoning in regard to what one must take under consideration when deciding the imortance, or lack thereof, of refusing to submit to the increasing intrusion of technology into our lives in return for what are often marginal benefits. From: Eric Cordian <emc(a)wire.insync.net> Subject: Re: The Borg Arrive To: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net Steve Schear writes: > Many of the large grocers in my area have also gone to > 'club' cards as a means of data mining and loyalty > promotion. However, the procedure for joining such clubs > is open loop, in that the cards are issued at the POS > and no check is made of the information your provide. > All of mine are pseudoanonymous. For the time being. However, that could change once all retail outlets are MarkOfTheBeast-Enabled. Infrastructure is infrastructure, after all. --- Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law" --- An interesting, widely unknown part of the Club Card equation is that, even if an individual does not 'provide' the vendor with the Mark of the Beast (SSN), those who control the databases involved 'add' MotB/SSN information from widely available 'lookup' sources. As well, the Corporate Beast seems to have learned a few tricks from the Government Beast. Just as the government takes your money as Federal Taxes and then uses it to 'buy' the compromise of your 'State rights' under the guise of matching federal funding, the corporations merely raise their prices and then give the customer a 'rebate' in return for registering for the Yellow Star Club Card. During my recent Soft Target Tour of Tucson, I used my base-player's Safeway Club Card, but I always made a point of going to the adjoining Walgreen's first, to get those things on my list which they sold, before going to Safeway. I cannot recall a single item which I bought at Walgreen's which was not a higher price at Safeway, unless one used the Club Card, whereupon it 'magically' became exactly the same price as the item was at Walgreen's. When shopping for myself, I refuse to play the 'Savings Club' game, for the same reason I don't sell my butt behind the GreyHound Bus Station for a paltry sum of money. Instead, I spend a few more dollars paying the inflated prices, and I leave a few expensive cuts of the store's meat products in a location where they won't be found for a few days. In essence, I pay more as a result of the Sheeple's actions, and they pay more as a result of mine. Tim May, a 34th Generation May Son and a licentious proctologist, has turned his multiple personality affliction into an overall benefit to the quality of his life by singlehandedly creating and maintaining all of the various personas that make up the CypherPunks list subscriber membership, maintaining the list archives, singlehandedly inventing all CypherPunks technologies under his 'Tim May' persona, and keeping his remaining personas in line by referring them to the 'archives' every time the subordinate personas try to take credit for legendary CypherPunk concepts such as 'sliced bread' and the 'wheel'. Despite being the only real subscriber to the CypherPunks list, he manages to not only singlehandedly run all of the Bay Area CypherPunks Physical Meetings, but also to put into practice the MeatSpace manifestations of the concepts he espouses, by methods such as discussed in the following: To: Eric Cordian <emc(a)wire.insync.net>, cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> Subject: Re: The Borg Arrive At 6:05 PM -0700 5/1/98, Eric Cordian wrote: >A few weeks ago, however, Rite Aid did something which was >not merely mildly annoying, but actually threatening to my >privacy. > >I walked into the store, and noticed that every sale tag >in the store had been embellished with fine print >containing the words "(With your Rite Rewards Card)" Giant >banners proclaimed that this card was free and could be >obtained by simply filling out a little form, available >at any register. This form required your name, address, >apt, state, zip, phone number, and date of birth, and the >card was barcoded. Did you miss the discussion of the Kalifornia Solution? At physical meetings and parties we _exchange member cards_ randomly. A persona hit upon this after I was showing my "Safeway" (a major Kalifornia-based chain in 46 of the 57Semi-Autonomous Republics) and describing how we can execute a Chaumian exchange. As the cards are just cards, with no photo and no obvious I.D. attached, such exchanges are easy. >Beware the Borg. Coming soon to a neighborhood store near you. > >P.S. I went with the card. But of the cards I have, all are filled out illegibly or have been traded multiple times. Identity entropy is an interesting concept. --Tim May "The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of tyrants...." ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. Federal US Marshall Clow, famous as the LEA who finally brought the Blues Brothers to Justice and Ray Charles to Blind Justice, suggests that Identity Entropy Warriors use the addresses of the the secret lairs of the Circle of Eunuchs and the Army of Dog in filling out all forms, so that the UCE/Spams they so dearly love can be forwarded to them after InfoWar has driven them underground. To: Rabid Wombat <wombat(a)mcfeely.bsfs.org>, Martin Minow <minow(a)apple.com> From: Marshall Clow <mclow(a)owl.csusm.edu> Subject: Re: The Borg Arrives Cc: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net At 8:45 AM -0700 5/1/98, Rabid Wombat wrote: >On Fri, 1 May 1998, Martin Minow wrote: >> <Eric Cordian <emc(a)wire.insync.net> accepts a loyalty >> card and complains that he has lost his privacy. >> So, do the Cypherpunks thing -- get another card and use >> that sometimes. >> In fact, have all your friends get cards and, whenever >> you get together throw your cards in a pile and take new >> ones away with you > >> ps: did you actually sign your real name? If so, we're >> going to take away your secret decoder ring. > He used his real address. Now they know where to find > his cat ... Try 1060 West Addison; Chicago IL (Wrigley Field) or 70 Brookline Dr.; Boston MA (Fenway Park) -- Marshall Marshall Clow Adobe Systems <mailto:mclow@mailhost2.csusm.edu> "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." ---Thomas Jefferson Although Marshall Clow ends his post with a grotesquely misquoted statement from Thomas Jefferson--whose original quotations in regard to government invariably contained words such as ratfuckers, cocksuckers, slimeballs, jerkwads, etc.--it nonetheless reflects the type of subterfuge that Jefferson foresaw taking place in the sphere of government, which is today being mirrored in the methodologies of corporations worldwide. The 'federal matching funds' and 'club card savings' scams are but one example of the reasons that an increasing number of citizens, such as Tim May, are finding it necessary to undergo training in proctology, in order to figure out just what the hell governments and corporations are *doing* back there... The preceeding illustrates what individuals and small cells of Army of Dog Warriors can do to throw an element of misdirection into the increasing number of tracking mechanisms being put in place in our daily lives. However, these effect of these types of resistance to the digitalization of humanity are generally far outweighed by the mindless SheepleDom of the masses in allowing themselves to be herded unquestioningly into an endless variety of feeding pens where they are expected to feed on corporate products and, in turn, be fed upon by the government. Of much more effect are the actions of potential Army of Dog Warriors who are in positions which allow them to add misdirection to the digital equation at a level which can throw a Major Screw into the machinery. System Administrators, DataBase Managers, Tech Support personnel, software and hardware Programmers and Developers, are all in a position to enter random numbers into the structured equations designed to monitor and track an increasing number of individual citizens whose lives will be documented in increasing detail in an ever-widening network of corporate and government databases. Tim C. May Owes Me $ .05 As His Share Of The Money That Was Ripped Off From Me By Sun MicroSystems By Selling Me An Operating System Which Was Written By University Students Who Put Comments In The Source Files Which Made Fun Of People Over '30': Tim--I paid Deloite & Touche $ 60,000 to do a Quality Control Analysis on my life, in general, and their report, which is the equivalent of borrowing my watch to tell me what time it is, indicates that the posts you have made to the CypherPunks Disturbed Male LISP since 7 Dec, 1989, are worth $ .03, so as long as you send me your $ .02 worth, we can call it even, and I won't have to launch an assault on Mayonnaise Mountain and put my SPARCard 2 where the Sun MicroSystems don't shine... The Bottom Line, Version 9.9, Revision 0.0: It's my birthday, I'm halfway through a bottle of Glenfiddich, Cask Strength (51% alcohol) Scotch, which is produced in Dufftown (Home of 'Duff Beer', Homer Simpson's drink of choice), Banffshire (Just outside of Calgary, AB), Scotland (An independent Cirle of Eunuchs/Army of Dog Republic often referred to as 'The Texas of the British Empire'). My Dad gave me a birthday call, during which he informed me that his talks with the RCMP revealed that Canadian Customs can hold my computers, etc., up to 90 days before exorcising their option to put their dick up my ass, and then hold it for the fifty years during which the outcome of any further court proceedings are decided. I totally flipped out, screaming all kinds of self- incriminating utterances which prove conclusively that I am a danger to the lives and lifes of decent, Dog- Fearing MeatSpaceIzens everywhere, even though I am fully aware that my electronic communications are being monitored by those who will be 'between a rock and a hard place' when they have to decide whether they should admit to their illegal, surrupticious surveillance of my life, since birth, which would prove that my extreme paranoia validates my 'sanity defense', or to pretend that they are just a loosely-knit organization of semi-competent traffic-ticket writers who have no idea what this silly, paranoid fool is talking about, validating their claim that I should be committed to an internment camp for the Delusionally Politically Incorrect, and that the evidence confirming the reality of the basis of my nonsensical blatherings should be chalked up to 'mere coincidence'. For Professional Mathematicians Only: 1. Estimate the number of times I have 'twitched' in between the time I screamed at my Dad that the RCMP are not the only ones in possession of firearms. 2. Divide this estimate by the number of times I have gotten laid since 1992 (Hint: '0'). 3. Add the number of times that Toto has forged posts to the CypherPunks list, using your name. 4. Subtract the number of ASCII-Art spams sent to the list since July 31, 1999 (Hint: 'The same as answer #2'). 5. Multiply by Franklin's Fudge Factor. 6. Plot Pinkerton's Probability Point. 7. Ask yourself, "How many stops did the train make?" An accurate calculation of the undescribable, inane, indiscrimate insanities enumerated above, will, if divided by the value of Pi legislated by Congress, provide the number of bodies it takes to spell 'Einstein Was Crazy'. While this in no way relates to valid CypherPukes issues such as Craptographics or Piracy, it is essential to the issue of exactly when this chapter of 'SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS' ceased to follow the pre-ordained path which the Tao was directing it toward, by way of CensorShip by the Cosmic Muffin, and became a meaningless diatribe during which I tried to disguise the fact that I am jumping up and down, screaming "KILL, KILL, KILL!!!" and putting my head through the walls of my home in an increasingly futile attempt to prevent myself from stepping beyond the boundaries of the social programming provided by the Secret Government Agents Cleverly Disguised As Teachers and emptying the clips of several dozen illegal firearms into the MeatSpace boundaries of a Post Office, a Luby's Cafeteria, and a Schoolhouse Full Of 'Innocent Children Who Would Eventually Murder Their Parents If I Didn't Slaughter Them, Anyway' To Be Named Later. The concept of the Army of Dog assumes that the majority of DogIzens will be sufficiently sane to direct their rEvolutionary thoughts, feelings and actions in a direction which will result in the BioSemiotic Evolution of Humankind moving forward to an increasingly logical and humanistic future. If a few MadDogs such as myself have to be put down by LEA CypherPunks, and a number of Sheeple need to be Nuked by Timothy C. McCypherPunks, then it is a small price to pay for ensuring that SpamFord will be free to compete with Dimitri's ASCII-Art and Fuck(a)Yourself.Up's Trojan Horses for the attention of CypherPunks Disturbed Male LISP Mambo'ers who have remained subscribed to 'cypherpunks-unedited(a)toad.com', in order to document the 'Secret Conspiracy Against The CypherPunks List' that is being perpetrated by the Commie Schill, Ignoramus Chewed-Off, the Awe-Stun-Taxes WebMasturbator, James ChokeTheMonkey, and A Nietzsche Nazi Racing Across The Tundra In A Snowmobile To Be Named Later. When all is said and done, it matters little that the Violent Armed Thugs who comprise the Dudley DoWrong Division of the RCMP are incapable of setting up and railroading an individual who is half as smart as his dog. What matters is that they can shoot his sorry ass, move the body to the nearest Reservation, put a skirt on him, add the body of dead, young Native child with a tube of glue in his hand, and launch an internal investigation by their BumBuddies (TM) that will show them to have followed Proper PoliceMurder Procedure. Now For The 'BAD' News: As you have probably guessed, given the obvious degeneration of this rambling diatribe into an incoherent 'Rage Against The Machine', I have finally sunk into such a depraved condition of violent insanity that any astute judge of the human condition can easily predict that the next chapter of 'SAHMD' will tell The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But The Truth. Please read it, anyway... If you constantly remind yourself that I am a madman, then you can relegate what I have to reveal to your subconsious, and continue to chop wood and carry water without feeling obligated to join me in an assault on everything that righteous, Dog-Fearing Netizens hold sacred. The Retribution is NOW!

1 0

password.pwl
by muad＠iname.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I have the source code for glide.c the decrypter but i dont know how to run the program. Therefore i need your help in this. --------------------------------------------------- Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com

2 1

RE: [OFF TOPIC] Spam
by Trei, Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

[Trei, Peter] stanSqncrs [SMTP:StanSqncrs@aol.com] wrote: >Apparently only as far back as 1993, the definition of the >word "spam" from the on-line jargon file was this (according >to the New Hackers Dictionary) - >spam [from the MUD community] vt. To crash a program by >over-running a fixed- size buffer with excessively large >input data. See also Buffer Overflow, Overrun Screw, Smash >the Stack. >Obviously that definition has changed since then. I've seen >it go from that to repetitive commercial advertising, and >I've seen it used to brand someone as an outcast of a list >for future removal simply because a small minority didn't >like what that person had said (so it was being used at that >time to mean 'objectional material'). >And in all the times I've seen the word fly, there has never >been anykind of volume that would come close to overblowing >the forum's mechanical capabilities. >So, I'm curious as to who/what dictated the meaning of that >to change so drasticly. Write me in private if it's >off-subject (and yes, you can write me anonomously if you >don't want a response. :-) ) How quickly they forget... It's not a change of meaning; rather, it is a new branch off of an earlier root meaning. The ultimate root, is of course, Hormel's processed meat product. I don't know how old that is but it goes back at least to WW2. The immediate root lies in a Monty Python sketch of the early 70's. The text may be found at http://w3.informatik.gu.se/~dixi/spam.htm (don't miss the sound clip.) It takes place in a cafe, where almost every menu item includes Spam. As a waitress reads the menu to some patrons ("egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam..." etc), a group of Vikings at the next table start to sing: "Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam" "Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam!" "Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam!" (repeat endlessly) ---------------- At certain science fiction conventions in the late 70's and early 80's it became a tradition for groups of fans (to whom the Pythons were minor deities) to parade en mass through the corridors of convention hotels singing the Spam Song. Many online fen were also active in early MUDs, so the term came to be used for unwanted, repetitive, voluminous, and content-free input of all kinds. ------------ Flash forward to April 14, 1994. The WWW is not on most peoples radar yet; it's still the Age of Usenet. Cantor & Siegel, a pair of shysters, figure out that they can advertise their dubious 'services' (charging $100 for information which the government gives out for free) at no cost on usenet. Like many lawyers, they suffer from a mental disorder which leads them to believe that any action which is not explicitly against the law is reasonable and appropriate. They send their ad to over 5000 newsgroups, regardless of topic. In those days, many netusers read multiple newsgroups every morning. That day, every newsgroup you opened included the same article in the subject list, along with dozens of angry denouncments of the off-topic post. *Every* *single* *newsgroup*. The resemblance to the menu at the Python cafe was unmistakeable, and 'spam' was the term instantly adopted to describe the practice. Since then, the use of the term 'spam' has been expanded to refer to any sort of off-topic and undesired information sent over the net, especially when a shotgun approach is used. Question: When was the *first* spam type message? I remember in the early 80's a student spammed Usenet, asking for small donations to help him meet tuition. Are there any earlier cases? Peter Trei ptrei(a)securitydynamics.com

1 0

Re: Spam
by jim＠mentat.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Stan the Sequencer sez: > Apparently only as far back as 1993, the definition of the word "spam" from > the on-line jargon file was this (according to the New Hackers Dictionary) - > > spam [from the MUD community] vt. To crash a program by over-running a fixed- > size buffer with excessively large input data. See also Buffer Overflow, > Overrun Screw, Smash the Stack. This isn't quite accurate. The term "spamming" in Mudding has always meant inundating the players with repetitive material, whether intentionally or accidentally, and has been used in that sense since sometime around 1990 at least. The "overflow" is of user screens, not stacks or buffers... although of course any high usage like that can test a program's limits. I just wrote and snipped a long disquisition on the history of spam starting with Clarence Thomas IV in 1993, having realized it's probably not relevant to your interests and old hat to everybody else. Suffice it to say that spam does require extra resources to process, both in hardware and time. We resent it because the end user is paying for it rather than the advertiser, so there is no natural limit to the amount of crap they can pour on us. Jim Gillogly

1 0

Re: Spam
by StanSqncrs 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to Peter Trei for that bit of history. In a message dated 5/7/98 10:26:48 AM Central Daylight Time, jim(a)mentat.com writes: << I just wrote and snipped a long disquisition on the history of spam starting with Clarence Thomas IV in 1993, having realized it's probably not relevant to your interests ... >> Actually, by the timing you describe, it would probably make it VERY relevant to my interests. I'd love to see it. << and old hat to everybody else. Suffice it to say that spam does require extra resources to process, both in hardware and time. We resent it because the end user is paying for it rather than the advertiser, so there is no natural limit to the amount of crap they can pour on us. >> But times have changed again. Now the users have unlimited access. BTW: As I understand it, the corporations were given free-speech rights with a bad Supreme Court decision back in the '20's, even though the constitution only grants rights to "people" and "citizens" (14th amendment) Stan

1 0

My mail address changed
by iw＠merkur.contexo.de 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Your mail address cypherpunks(a)toad.com was found in one of my mailboxes. I want to inform you, that the following mail addresses iw(a)return-online.de ingo.wechsung(a)return-online.de iw(a)cas-nord.de ingo.wechsung(a)return-online.de will be invalid from July 1st, 1998 on. Please use one of the following addresses from now on: iw(a)contexo.de ingo.wechsung(a)contexo.de Kind Regards Ingo Wechsung

1 0

http://www.jya.com/whp043098.htm
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 5/8/98 6:25 AM John Young J Orlin Grabbe Sobolewski phoned last night. Sobolewski gave me his opinion. 1 Campos is going to hold in camera ex parte conference with NSA 2 Campos will then award summary judgment to NSA. I told Sobolewski that most of the legal citations in Campos document were not contained in the pleadings. Sobolewski EXCLAIMED, Oh. Sobolewski is particularly good at law. Sobolewskis father was a lawyer and judge both in Poland and Australia. Sobolewski prevailed in an lawsuit spanning the US and Australia - but it still cost him more than $20k TELLING a lawyer what to do. Sobowleski usually beats speeding tickets. Sobolewski uses DISCOVERY to obtain maintenance and calibration records of police radar. And also radar operation training records of the officer who stopped him. The MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER authored by some government lawyers and signed by Campos is clearly a candidate for one of the STUPIDEST and INCOMPETENT legal documents ever written. http://www.jya.com/whp043098.htm Morales and I LOVE IT, of course! This is why we were so happy last Friday. We got another shot at THEM [aka The Great Satan]. Morales is taking the day off from Sandia today. We will finish and file our motion. Then BLAST it out on the Infobahn. I see other good legal advice linked at http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ http://www.phrack.com/52/P52-05 Later bill

1 0

FILED 98 MAY - 8 AM 11:31
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Young File-stamped copy was mailed to you at US Courthouse. Later bill UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO William H. Payne ) Arthur R. Morales ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v ) CIV NO 97 0266 ) SC/DJS ) Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF ) Director, National Security Agency ) National Security Agency ) ) Defendant ) PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND Santiago E. Campos MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FILED 98 APR 30 AM 11:45 1 COMES NOW plaintiffs Payne and Morales [Plaintiffs] to exercise their rights under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52. Findings by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings (b) Amendment. On a party's motion filed no later than 10 days after entry of judgment, the court may amend its findings--or make additional findings--and may amend the judgment accordingly. ... 2 Plaintiffs will show that the Court's [Campos] MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER http://www.jya.com/whp043098.htm contains presumably-unintentional false statements or misleading statements of essential material facts. Plaintiffs move to permit Campos to amend ORDER to reflect proper remedy of obvious evidence of lack of impartiality and judicial misconduct. A judge is supposed to judge arguments presented by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant. An judge is NOT SUPPOSED to engage in legal research designed to support either Plaintiff or Defendant's case. Judge Campos was supposed to rely on legal citations presented ONLY by pro se Plaintiffs or NSA Defendant Minihan's lawyer, Assistant US Attorney Jan Elizabeth Mitchell [Mitchell]. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER contains OVER ABOUT 144 legal citations most of which WERE NOT PRESENTED TO THE COURT in pleadings by either Plaintiffs or Defendant. 3 Campos writes Plaintiffs contend that Federal Civil Procedure Rule 36 explicitly provides that discovery is allowed without leave of the court. Plaintiffs quote citation The Court is unsure where Plaintiffs found the language they quote, but it is incorrect. Federal Civil Judicial Procedure and Rules, WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY, 1991 Revised Edition, page 110 states, Rule 36. Requests for Admission Request for admission (a) A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for the purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) set forth the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE COURT, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. ... Updated Rule 36 seen at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/overview.htm, click at 36. Requests for Admission states A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. Without leave of court or written stipulation, requests for admission may not be served before the time specified in Rule 26(d) . Rule 26(d) states (d) Timing and Sequence of Discovery. Except when authorized under these rules or by local rule, order, or agreement of the parties, a party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have met and conferred as required by subdivision (f). Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence, and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party's discovery. Essential material facts are 1 5/23/97 Docket Sheet entry 9 Plaintiffs file MOTION by plaintiff for order to accept discovery plan (dmw) 2 Defiant misses filing date for response to entry 9. 3 Plaintiffs' file on 6/9/97 Docket Sheet entry 13 MOTION by plaintiff to accept discovery plan of plaintiffs as an unopposed motion before the court (dwm) 4 In panic Defendant's lawyer US Mitchell submits on 6/9/97 Docket Sheet entry 14, RESPONSE by defendant to motion to accept discovery plan of plaintiffs as an unopposed motion before the Court [13-1] (dwm) [Entry date 06/10/97] Lawyer Mitchell, apparently realizing her legal procedural blunder, is forced to deposit her LATE MOTION in Court outside mailbox since entry was not stamped FILED until June 10. The "time specified in Rule 26(d)" was satisfied, therefore Plaintiffs were with the law for proceeding with discovery. 4 Campos cites in B. Standing of Plaintiff Morales ... see also NLRB v. Sears. Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 144 n. 10 ( 1975). Plaintiffs can find no reference to NLRB v. Sears. Roebuck & Co in Mitchell's pleadings Therefore Campos reaches conclusion that Morales should be removed partially on obviously biased citations of Campos own legal research. 5 Campos writes in C. Proper Defendant Campos cites the following legal citations to justify dismissing defendant Minihan 1 Thompson v. Walbran, 990 F.2d 403, 405 (8thCir. 1993) (per curiam); 2 Petrus v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 581, 582-83 (5th Cir.1987); 3 Sherwood Van Lines, Inc. v. United States Department of the Navy,732 F. Supp. 240, 241 (D.D.C. 1990); 4 Gary Energy Corp. v. United StatesDepartment of Energy, 89 F.R.D. 675, 675-77 (D. Colo. 1981). 5 But see, e.g Diamond v. FBI, 532 F. Supp. 216, 21920 (S.D.N.Y. 1981), aff'd on other grounds, 707 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1983); 6 Hamlin v. Kelley, 433 F. Supp. 180,181 (N.D. Ill. 1977). 7 Parks v. IRS, 618 F.2d 677 684 (10th Cir. 1980) Plaintiffs can find NONE of the above legal citations in ANY pleadings before the Court. Therefore, Plaintiffs conclude that Campos is obviously biased and has improperly introduced legal citations in an attempt to have Minihan dismissed. 6 Campos cites in III. FOIA A. FOIA Policy 1 NLRB v, Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1978). 2 Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services,907 F.2d 936, 941 (10th Cir. 1990) 3 Maricopa Audubon Society v. United States Forest Service, 923 F. Supp. 1436, 1438-39 (D.N.M. 1995) 4 Maricopa Audubon Society v. United States Forest Service, 923 F. Supp. 1436, 1438-39 (D.N.M. 1995) 5 Hale v. United States Department of Justice, 973 F.2d894, 897 (10th Cir. 1992) 6 (citing EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 79-80 (1973), vacated on other grounds, 509 U.S. 918 (1993)); 7 Office of Information and Privacy, U.S. Department of Justice, Freedom of Information Act Guide & Privacy Act Overview 3 (Sept. 1997 ed.) 8 S. Rep. No. 813, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 10 (1965), 9 United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Commission for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989);see id. at 774 10 Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 360-61(1976); 11 Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d 936,941 (10th Cir. 1990); 12 Johnson v. United States Department of Justice, 739F.2d 1514, 1516 (10th Cir. 1984) 13 Hale v. United States Department of Justice, 2 F.3d 1053, 1057 (10th Cir. 1993); 14 Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, 960 F.2d 105, 107 (9th Cir. 1992). 15 Bowen v.United States Food and Drug Administration, 925 F.2d 1225, 1226 (9th Cir. 1991) . 16 King v. Department of Justice, 830 F.2d 210, 217 (D.C. Cir.1987). 17 Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C.Cir. 1973); 18 Weiner v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972, 977 (9th Cir. 1991). 19 Halperin v. CIA, 629 F.2d 144, 14849 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Plaintiffs can find NONE of the above citation of law in pleadings before this Court Campos is obviously biased for including above 18 citations. Campos cites internet addresses 1 < http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html > 2 < http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html > 3 < http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html > 4 < http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html> 5 < http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html> 6 <http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/oip.html> Mitchell cites no Internet address in her pleadings. Above Internet address citations are not those given by Plaintiffs. Therefore, Campos introduces material not in pleadings before this court in his MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 7 Campos cites in B. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 1 Taylor v. United States Treasury Department, 127 F.3d 470,475 (5th Cir. 1997) 2 Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1367 n.3 (11th Cir. 1994) 3 Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corp. v. United States Department of Labor, 118 F.3d 205, 08-09 (4th Cir. 1997) 4 Trenerry v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 95-5150, 70 F.3d 598, 1996 WL 88459 at *1 (10th Cir. March 1, 1996) 5 Lanter v. Department of Justice, No. 93-6308, 19 F.3d 33, 1994 WL 75876 at *1 (10th Cir. March 8, 1994) 6 Hass v. United States Air Force, 848 F. Supp. 926, 929 (D. Kan. 1994) 7 Katzman v. CIA, 903 F. Supp.434, 437 (E.D. N.Y. 1995) (citing Becker v. Internal Revenue Service, 34 F.3d 398, 405 (7th Cir. 1994)). 8 Ruotolo v. Department of Justice, 53 F.3d 4, 8 (2d Cir. 1995); 9 Spannaus v. United States Department of Justice, 824 F.2d 52, 59 (D.C. Cir 1987); 10 Kuchta v. Harris, No. 92-1121, 1993 WL 87705 at *3 (D.Md. March 25, 1993) 11 Trueblood v. United States Department of Treasury, 943 F. Supp. 64, 66-67 (D.D.C. 1996); Plaintiffs could NOT find ANY of the above legal citations in pleadings before this Court. Campos gives biased opinion on exhaustion of administrative remedies. 8 Campos cites in C. Summary Judgment 1 Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam). 2 Shabazz v. Askins, 14 F.3d 533, 535 (10th Cir. 1994). 3 Green v.Dorrell, 969 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1992). 4 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 255 (1986). 5 Magnum Foods, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co., 36 F.3d 1491, 1497 (10th Cir. 1994). 6 World of Sleep. Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co., 756 F.2d 1467, 1474 (10th Cir. 1985) 7 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett. 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986). 8 Bacchus Industries. Inc. v. Arvin Industries. Inc., 939 F.2d 887,891 (10th Cir. 1991). Plaintiffs can find none of the above citation in pleadings before this Court. 9 Campos cites in 3. Plaintiff's First Summary Judgment Motion 1 Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969) 2 Phillippi v. CIA, 546 F.2d 1009, 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1976). 3 Patterson v. FBI, 705 F. Supp. 1033, 1039 (D.N.J. 1989), aff'd 898 F.2d 595 (3d Cir. 1990). 4 American Friends Service Committee v. Department of Defense, 831 F.2d 441, 444 (3d Cir. 1987) 5 Salisbury v. United States, 690 F.2d 996, 970 (D.C. Cir. 1982) 6 Sen. Report No. 1200, 93rd Cong. 12 (1974), U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 6267, 6290 (1974)). 7 AG's 1993 FOIA Memorandum 8 Afshar v. Department of State, 702 F.2d 1125, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 1983). 9 Pfeiffer v. CIA, 721 F. Supp. 337, 342 (D.D.C. 1989) 10 Public Citizen v. Department State, 11 F.3d 198, 204 (D.C. Cir. 1993). 11 Fitzgibbon v. CIA, 911 F.2d 755, 766 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 12 Military Audit Project v. Casey, 656 F.2d 724, 74345 (D.C. Cir 1981) 13 Phillippi v. CIA, 655 F.2d 1325, 1332-33 (D.C. Cir. 1981) 14 McNamera v. United States Department of Justice, 974 F. Supp. 946, 955-56 (W.D. Tex. 1997). 15 Halperin v. CIA, 629 F.2d 144, 14849 (D.C. Cir. 1980), 16 United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989); 17 King v. United States Department of Justice, 830 F.2d 210, 224 (D.C. Cir. 1987); 18 Fitzgibbon v. CIA, 578 F. Supp. 704, 709 (D.D.C. 1983). 19 Katzman v. CIA, 903 F. Supp. 434, 438 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). 20 McDonnell v. United States, 4 F.3d 1227, 1246 (3d Cir. 1993) (citing Association of Retired Railroad Workers v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 830 F.2d 331, 336 (D.C. Cir. 1987)). 21 United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 775 (1989). 22 Founding Church of Scientology v. NSA, 610 F.2d 824, 30, 833 & n. 80 (D.C. Cir. 1979). 23 EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 80 (1973); 24 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1978). Plaintiffs cannot find any of the above 24 citation in pleadings before this Court. 9 Campos writes Consequently, the Court requests that Defendant provide it, as it has offered to do, an in camera ex parte declaration or detailed affidavit explaining its reasons for its "Glomar response" and for nondisclosure of none of the Iranian and Libyan messages and translations from June 1, 1980 to June 10,1996, if they do exist. See Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d 936, 942. (10th Cir. 1990).24 The declaration of affidavit must be provided by the Defendant to the Court within sixty days of the date of this opinion. The Court will stay its decision on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Exemption 3) until after it has heard or examined Defendant's explanation. and quotes 24 As the Tenth Circuit has explained: In order to fulfill its obligation to review de novo the agency's decision not to disclose materials sought under the FOIA, a district court has a variety of options. "The FOIA allows the district court flexibility in utilizing in camera review of the disputed documents, indexing, oral testimony, detailed affidavits, or alternative procedures to determine whether a sufficient factual basis exists for evaluating the correctness of the [agency] determination in each case." [If a Vaughn index or an affidavit is insufficient,] then the district court must utilize other procedures in order to develop an adequate factual basis for review of the agency action. Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d 936, 942 (10th Cir. 1990) (quoting DeSalvo v. Internal Revenue Service, 861 F.2d 1217, 1222 n.6 (10th Cir. 1988) (first alteration in Anderson)). Plaintiffs cannot find reference to 1 Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d 936, 942 (10th Cir. 1990) 2 DeSalvo v. Internal Revenue Service, 861 F.2d 1217, 1222 n.6 (10th Cir. 1988) in pleadings before this Court. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs move for Campos to amend MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER which currently reads 10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that sua sponte, Defendant is DEEMED by the Court to be the NSA, and not Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan. Future captions for this case should reflect this change. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Morales is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in regard to Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal and for Summary Judgment, Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal is DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is STAYED pending an in camera ex parte declaration consistent herewith provided by Defendant to the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of this opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Evidence from Admissions is DENIED as MOOT. to read 11 Santiago Campos disqualifies himself under 28 USC § 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. ... from further participation in case CIV NO 97 0266, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO for basing much of MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FILED 98 APR 30 AM 11:45 on materials not contained in pleadings before the Court and vacates ORDER FILED 98 APR 30 AM 11:45. Respectfully submitted, William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Arthur R. Morales 1024 Los Arboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87107 Pro se litigants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing memorandum was mailed to Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF, Director, National Security Agency, National Security Agency, 9800 Savage Road, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000 and hand delivered to Jan E Mitchell, Assistant US Attorney, 525 Silver SW, ABQ, NM 87102 this Friday May 8, 1998. 9

2 1