December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Just Released! 16 Million!
by busadmn＠ix.netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

IT WAS JUST RELEASED!! INTRODUCING...MILLIONS VOL. 1 We took a total of over 92 million email addresses from many of the touted CD's that are out there (bought them all - some were $300+)! We added the millions we had in storage to those. When we combined them all, we had in excess of 100+ million addresses in one huge file. We then ran a super "sort/de-dupe" program against this huge list. It cut the file down to less than 25 million!!! Can you believe that? It seems that most people that are selling CD's are duping the public by putting numerous files of addresses in the CD over and over. This created many duplicate addresses. They also had many program "generated" email addresses like Compuserve, MCI, ANON's, etc. This causes a tremendous amount of undeliverables, and for those that use Stealth programs, clogs up servers quickly with trash, etc. We then ran a program that contained 150+ keywords to remove addresses with vulgarity, profanity, sex-related names, postmaster, webmaster, flamer, abuse, spam, etc., etc. Also eliminated all .edu, .mil, .org, .gov, etc. After that list was run against the remaining list, it reduced it down to near 16 million addresses! So, you see, our list will save people hundreds of dollars buying all others that are out there on CD and otherwise. Using ours will be like using the 100+ million that we started with, but a lot less money and alot less time!! We also purchased Cyber-Promos ($995.00) CD. We received it just prior to finishing production work on the new CD. We had our people take a random sample of 300,000 addresses from the touted 2.9 that they advertised. We used a program that allows us to take a random sample of addresses from any list. We were able to have the program take every 9th address, thus giving us a 300,000 list of Cyber's email addresses from top to bottom. We did not clean these, but we did create 3 seperate files named cyber1.txt, cyber2.txt, & cyber3.txt of 100,000 addresses each. This will give all people that use the list a opportunity to send mail to the list before deciding if their CD is all it's hyped to be. We also included a 2+ million "Remove/Flamer" file broke into seperate files for ease of extracting and adding to your own database of removes. "You can buy from the REST or you can buy from the BEST. Your choice. _____________________________ What others are saying: "I received the CD on Friday evening. Like a kid with a new toy, I immediately started bulking out using the new email addresses. Over the course of the weekend, I emailed out over 500,000 emails and I received less than TWENTY undeliverables!! I am totally satisfied with my purchase!! Thanks Premier!!" Dave Buckley Houston, TX "This list is worth it's weight in gold!! I sent out 100,000 emails for my product and received over 55 orders! Ann Colby New Orleans, LA **************************************** HERE'S THE BOTTOM LINE Here is what you get when you order today! >> 16 Million Email Addresses... 1 per line in simple text format on a CD. Files are in lots of 100,000 (no codes needed to open files). All files are separated by domain name for your convenience. PLUS you receive a tremendous REMOVE list! AND the a sampling of CyberPromo's HOT list. >>> NOW ONLY $149.00! This price is effective for the next seven days, thereafter the price will be $199.00 so ORDER NOW! All lists are completely free of any Duplicates. We also on a continual basis, add New Names and Remove Undeliverables and Remove Requests. The result is the Cleanest Email Addresses Available Anywhere to use over and over again, for a FRACTION of the cost that other companies charge. Typical rates for acquiring email lists are from 1 cent to as high as 3 cents per email address - that's "INFORMATION HIGHWAY" ROBBERY!. Don't even hesitate on this one or you will miss out on the most effective way to market anywhere..PERIOD! If you have any further questions or to place an order by phone, please do not hesitate to call us at: 908-245-1143 To order our email package, simply print out the EZ ORDER FORM below and fax or mail it to our office today. We accept Visa, Mastercard, AMEX, Checks by Fax and Mail. _________________ EZ Order Form _____Yes! I would like to order MILLIONS Vol. 1 email addresses for only $149.00. *Please select one of the following for shipping.. ____I would like to receive my package OVERNIGHT. I'm including $15 for shipping. (outside US add an additional $25 for shipping) ____I would like to receive my package 2 DAY delivery. I'm including $10 for shipping. (outside US add an additional $25 for shipping) DATE_____________________________________________________ NAME____________________________________________________ COMPANY NAME___________________________________________ ADDRESS_________________________________________________ CITY, STATE, ZIP___________________________________________ PHONE NUMBERS__________________________________________ FAX NUMBERS_____________________________________________ EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________________ TYPE OF CREDIT CARD: ______VISA _____MASTERCARD CREDIT CARD# __________________________________________ EXPIRATION DATE________________________________________ NAME ON CARD___________________________________________ AMOUNT $____________________ (Required) SIGNATURE:x________________________ DATE:x__________________ You may fax your order to us at: 1-908-245-3119 CHECK BY FAX SERVICES! If you would like to fax a check, paste your check below and fax it to our office along with all forms to: 1-908-245-3119 ****************************************************** ***24 HOUR FAX SERVICES*** PLEASE PASTE YOUR CHECK HERE AND FAX IT TO US AT 1-908-245-3119 ******************************************************* If You fax a check, there is no need for you to send the original check. We will draft up a new check, with the exact information from your original check. All checks will be held for bank clearance. If you feel more comfortable sending payment through the mail, please send all forms and Check or Money Order to: Rapture Marketing Inc. P.O. Box 616 Kenilworth, NJ 07033

1 0

lists
by nobody＠nsm.htp.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Can someone tell me if the toad cypherpunk list gets *all* the cypherpuink traffic? As I understand it there are three possible subscription points -- does one subscription cover all? Thanks in advance...

2 1

Announcing Crypto Kong, Release Candidate Two.
by jamesd＠echeque.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-- Announcing Crypto Kong, Release Candidate Two. http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong please test. Crypto Kong, like PGP, provides digital signatures and communications encryption. The important difference between it and other products that provide digital signatures and encryption is that it is not certificate based. Instead it is signature based. This eliminates the steep initial learning and management curves of existing products. The user does not need use and manage specialized certificates except for specialized purposes Perhaps more importantly, it also eliminates the threat we saw in England, the threat of the government giving itself a monopoly in certificate distribution, potentially creating the Number-Of-The-Beast system, where you need a government certificate to log on to dirty picture sites, to buy, to sell, to put up web pages. The big complexity and user hostility in existing products is creating and managing certificates. For those who need contracts and certificates, (and with Kong one almost never needs certificates) Kong handles them in an easy and natural way. See the discussion in the web site in the chapters: Linking digital IDs with paper documents or physical presence and Certificates and contracts This aspect of Kong seems to have been insufficiently tested in the beta tests. The key feature of the proposed product is that any digitally signed document can be stored in the database, and itself performs the functions of a certificate, just as a normal handwritten signature does. The user usually does not need to check a document against a certificate to see if it was signed by the "real" John Doe. Instead he normally checks one document against other documents stored in the database that have the same signature. And similarly when he encrypts a document, he does not need to use a certificate to encrypt a message to the one *real* John Doe, he merely encrypts a message to the *same* John Doe who signed the letter he is replying to. At present people have to deal with certificate management problems regardless of whether they really need certificates. For example the most common usage of PGP is to check that two signatures that purport to be by the same person are in fact by the same person. Unfortunately you cannot check one signature against another directly using PGP or any of the other existing products. Instead you have to check both signatures against a public key certificate, even if the authentication information in that certificate is irrelevant to your purpose, which it usually is, which means that you have to download the certificate from somewhere, and the person signing it had to upload it somewhere. As PGP always checks a document against the certificate, rather than against any other document the user happens to feel is relevant to the question, the person signing the document needs to get his certificate properly signed by some widely trusted third party, which is too much trouble or too complicated for many people. The signatures and contracts in Crypto Kong are optionally tolerant of email munging The web pages contain a new web page "Business Vision" which discusses the widespread failure to adopt cryptography, the widespread reluctance to pay for cryptography, and the illiquidity of various products for transferring money on the net, and proposes a path to a solution. Clearly, PGP has had rather poor penetration for business uses, and by and large, people only need to encrypt or sign stuff when there is money at stake. I believe that this product will be more acceptable for the typical businessman than PGP is, because it is easier to use, and existing business practices translate more readily to the identity model it supports than does the PGP identity model. The web page also contains full source code. Crypto Kong is written in large part as ActiveX component, and the use interface and database management code is written in visual basic. The use of ActiveX should make it easy to quickly code products and web page that perform tasks involving encryption. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG AXOOTHyx0TpTLdyQsBnt7WmaVIo1l4WDGabHKK0Y 4Bxm/YWIEOTOK6zRVH57lP7PENFT5OFN+IR39Fcx8

1 0

HAYEKWEB: Hackney on Law & Econ History & Hayek
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:56:33 EST Reply-To: Hayek Related Research <HAYEK-L(a)MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> Sender: Hayek Related Research <HAYEK-L(a)MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> From: Gregransom <Gregransom(a)AOL.COM> Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) Subject: HAYEKWEB: Hackney on Law & Econ History & Hayek To: HAYEK-L(a)MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU >> Hayek on the Web << -- Law & Economics "Law and Neoclassical Economics: Science, Politics, and the Reconfiguration of American Tort Law Theory" by James R. Hackney, Jr. on the Web at: http://www.press.uillinois.edu/journals/lhrforums.html >From "Law and Neoclassical Economics: Science, Politics, and the Reconfiguration of American Tort Law Theory" by James R. Hackney, Jr.: " .. C. The Antistatist Imperative: F. A. Hayek and the Road to Law and Neoclassical Economics The technique of analysis coming out of early twentieth-century Vienna was not linked to any particular ideological position. In fact, Janik and Toulmin illustrate that the fundamental position could be characterized as "apolitical." However, F. A. Hayek independently provided a distinct ideological position shaped by the Viennese experience41 that had a profound impact on ideological debates in post-World War II America and, by extension, on economic analysis. Hayek's migration to England influenced the LSE debates that are crucial to understanding the strands of economic thought that framed Coase's work in particular, and law and neoclassical economics in general. In addition, Hayek directly shaped the law and neoclassical economics project at the University of Chicago.42 Hayek stated his ideological position in The Road to Serfdom.43 He asserted that Serfdom "is a political book" and that "all I shall have to say is derived from certain ultimate values."44 Written while Hayek held a professorship at the LSE, Serfdom was conceived as a direct response to a socialist ethos that permeated the European continent and endangered the liberal underpinnings of English politics. The goal of the book was to sound a "warning to the socialist intelligentsia of England"45 that their program would lead to the very totalitarianism so many had fought against. Despite its focus on the English intellectual scene, the book had an enormous impact in the United States.46 In fact, it produced a more extreme reaction, both positive and negative, in the United States than in England. No doubt part of the consternation on the American left was due to the boldness and scope of Serfdom.47 While the argument that "hot socialism" would poison a society might not have unsettled leftists, Hayek made similar claims regarding the welfare state.48 The problem articulated in Serfdom was that some of the core beliefs of hot socialism had become so embedded in the conceptual framework of intellectual thought that they threatened to undermine liberal society under the guise of the welfar state or egalitarian rhetoric. This would come, for example, in the form of knee-jerk calls for state/bureaucratic intervention in the economy when "judicious use of financial inducements might evoke spontaneous efforts."49 The polemical force of Serfdom stemmed from its evocation of the dangers of totalitarianism, particularly the Nazi Germany variety, manifest in social approaches to the ills that befall society. Hayek boldly and flatly asserted that "[i]t is necessary now to state the unpalatable truth that it is Germany whose fate we are in some danger of repeating."50 The core of the antistatist stance as articulated in Serfdom grew out of the belief in the uniqueness of individual activity and thought ("ethical individualism"). It was unacceptable, in fact impossible, for anyone other than the individual to make decisions for the individual without imposing an alien set of values. At that point, seemingly benign policy prescriptions dissolved into naked, unjustifiable coercion. Thus, "individuals should be allowed, within defined limits, to follow their own values and preferences rather than somebody else's."51 In the antigovernment sentiment and proincentive policies articulated in Serfdom, we see the ideological seeds that helped influence, but were not determinative of, the American law and neoclassical economics movement. The ways in which the antistatist ideal set forth in Serfdom would be reflected in social institutions are clear in Hayek's discussion of the legal system and are fundamental in linking his intellectual project to the law and neoclassical economics movement. Hayek's views on the legal system were shaped by his core belief that "competition" is the central means of "co-ordinating human effort" and the "conviction that, where effective competition can be created, it is a better way of guiding individual efforts than any other."52 Thus, in the effort to protect the individual, it is free market competition, not government intervention, that is presumed to be for the good. So, what of the law "[I]n order that competition should work beneficially, a carefully thought-out legal framework is required. ." In particular, some legal structure may be needed in order to accurately reflect the price of goods and services, which is the vital information for individuals.53 In sum, the law serves to facilitate competition, which is the system most conducive to individual freedom. It does so by setting the boundaries of competition. The law should "recognize the principle of private property and freedom of contract." In this regard, it acts as a neutral arbiter facilitating individual preferences and defining the "right to property as applied to different things." The rights associated with property, notwithstanding antistatist ideals, were not absolute, but contingent upon the particular situation. Efficiency was the criterion: the "systematic study of the forms of legal institutions which will make the competitive system work efficiently." Regarding legal rules specifically, Serfdom articulated a system in which "[t]he only question . . . is whether in the particular instance the advantages gained are greater than the social costs which they impose."54 Hayek's emphasis on legal rules, particularly as they affected social costs,55 is the link connecting him to the law and neoclassical economics movement. Hayek gave a detailed analysis of social costs and the limits of government intervention as a tool for minimizing such costs. However, to the extent that legal rules limiting property rights represent an activist role for government, Hayek stated that, though the scope of this permissible intervention on individual autonomy was not defined, "these tasks provide, indeed, a wide and unquestioned field for state activity."56 I argue below that the possibility of "state activity" within neoclassical economics provides the ground for progressive political appropriation of neoclassical economics. This discussion of postwar antistatism, as represented by Serfdom, and its logical progression to concrete neoclassical analyses of legal institutions, specifically property rights, begins to substantiate the first major claim of this essay: law and neoclassical economics is, at its core, about politics. It also shows how the conservative politics associated with neoclassical economics could be taken seriously if the dangers of progressivism articulated in Serfdom, including progressive ideals espoused by pragmatic instrumentalists, were heeded.57 Now we turn to the connections between neoclassical economics and the science of the analytic turn in order to begin establishing the other claim of this paper: law and neoclassical economics is, at its core, also about science. At the end, we find that there is a synthesis of the politics and science of law and neoclassical economics .. " >From "Law and Neoclassical Economics: Science, Politics, and the Reconfiguration of American Tort Law Theory" by James R. Hackney, Jr. Law and History Review. Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1997 >From "'Law and Neoclassical Economics': A Response to Commentaries 163-172" by James R. Hackney, Jr.: " .. I never identify Hayek as a "neoclassical economist" but I think it is (1) fair to say that Hayek, and Austrian economics generally, have had considerable influence on neoclassical theory;16 and, more importantly for my thesis, (2) Hayek has had a profound influence on the strand of law and neoclassical economics coming out of the University of Chicago.17 (footnote 17. Coase's recognition of his intellectual debt to F. A. Hayek and the institutional role Hayek played in establishing law and neoclassical economics studies at the University of Chicago is illustrative of this point. Hackney, "Law and Neoclassical Economics," 284, n. 42, 306, n. 141.) .. " >From "'Law and Neoclassical Economics': A Response to Commentaries 163-172" by James R. Hackney, Jr. _Law and History Review_ Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1998. Hayek on the Web is a regular feature of the Hayek-L list. --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>

1 0

Re: System
by kozmo killah 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

which system did you want? ---"Adrian J. Otto" <aotto(a)hangar.jetlink.net> wrote: > > Cosmos, > > Ok, I want to buy. Tell me more details. > > Adrian > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Lessig on antitrust and government regulation
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Lessig is the special master appointed by the judge in the Microsoft consent decree case. He once wrote: >Whether a regulation is >rational turns on the facts, and what counts as "the facts" turns on the >theory that animates inquiry into the facts. Wow. How do we know what theory is the right one, and when we should change it? -Declan

2 1

Re: cypherpunks and guns
by Ryan Lackey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<daemon(a)ATHENA.MIT.EDU> (Wei Dai) writes: > I don't understand why there is so much talk about guns here lately. > Unless someone comes up with a weapon that has some very unusual economic > properties, individuals cannot hope to compete with governments in the > domain of deadly force. If we have to resort to physical violence, we've > already lost! > > Think about it: if we can defend ourselves with guns, why would we need > crypto? I am fairly certain that as an irregular army soldier I could inflict a substantial amount of damage upon an occupying military. With maybe $20k in equipment and several hundred hours of training, you could make life very difficult for any luckless squad that happens your way. Multiply that by 100 million armed citizens and you see that armed civilian resistance *can* defeat an occupying army. Certainly in times of "peace" information/infrastructure warfare is much more cost effective for the guerilla -- but once they start sending armored patrols around armed with 600 surplus M-16 rifles and having [un]official rules of engagement which include sniper fire on the wives and children of citizens not convicted of any crime, burning tens of people alive for their religious beliefs, forcibly sodomizing suspects with wooden rods, and passing laws which cripple the 1st by making it a crime to read, it's perhaps worth looking at other methods of resistance. (wow, that approached Hettingan length while having little in common with his style :) Plus, I honestly believe certain people who lacked the foresight or desire to use anonymity have increased the chances of illegal unconstitutional government action against them. It'll be a lot harder to quietly kill someone and keep it out of the news if they're prepared to fight back to the extent that I gather Tim May and others are prepared. Even if being armed does nothing more than let the world know they have declared war against the constitution, it's worth it. Me, I still plan to get out before high powered riflery becomes anything other than a sport. The Seychelles are looking remarkably tempting... (I still say steel core ammo is the way to go, especially in 5.56 NATO and 7.62 Soviet. There exist plenty of vests which have rifle hardplate to stop those rounds -- even 7.62 NATO rounds. 7.62 NATO AP/API, though, is a bit tougher, buying you substantial time) Hacking on Eternity DDS, Ryan [Not actually a gun toting lunatic, nor does he play one on TV, but rather keeps them in a safe, and carries knives instead. Yay Massachusetts. I hope this does not spark a discussion of how to stop a government assault force armed with only a knife (hint: the answer is not "in parallel")] [*ObCrypto* (it's getting really hard to do this every time): AOLserver (a nice web server formerly from GNN/navisoft) punted their 128bit SSL module distribution *EVEN TO US CITIZENS* due to commerce department fuckedness. Anyone know where I could get a copy? It would really suck to have to patch the 40bit one into a 128bit version, since they do not distribute source. Sigh. But I've started to use it for insecure stuff because it's cheaper than Stronghold (read: free) and does some cool database stuff easier than apache. And (cool db stuff + free) is more important than (secure) or (secure and easily configured and supported) for this.] -- Ryan Lackey rdl(a)mit.edu http://mit.edu/rdl/

4 4

a good example of bad crypto hype
by David Honig 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

at http://www.meganet.com/explain.htm you can test your critical thinking skills... ------------------------------------------------------------ David Honig Orbit Technology honig(a)otc.net Intaanetto Jigyoubu "How do you know you are not being deceived?" ---A Compendium of Analytic TradeCraft Notes, Directorate of Intelligence, CIA

4 3

The hax0rz are at it again... check out www.unicef.org
by David E. Smith 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Although I can't agree with their methods, I really love their motives. In case they fix it sometime soon, go to: http://bureau42.base.org/mirrors/ and click the "unicef" link. dave

1 0

[hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!]]
by Tina (SingPing) Lai 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To: Airheadlin(a)aol.com, SWeeTpny98(a)aol.com, Tlai(a)mystop.com Subject: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!] From: Alyse4112 <Alyse4112(a)aol.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 21:06:34 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) To: Alyse4112(a)aol.com, OhUSoSilly(a)aol.com, Ninavc@aol.com,swimgirl12@hotmail.com Subject: Fwd:hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!] From: RayRay124 <RayRay124(a)aol.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 03:01:18 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) In a message dated 98-01-05 22:49:10 EST, DimplesF56 writes: << >> To: RayRay124(a)aol.com, VHSmile(a)aol.com, nail(a)home.com, Sak14@aol.com,AZNPL8YBOY@aol.com, ARISTO20(a)aol.com, JILTED76(a)aol.com Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!] From: DimplesF56 <DimplesF56(a)aol.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 22:49:10 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) To: Helen Huang <Sweets637(a)AOL.COM>, Jenny Young <kbzxgqgirl(a)AOL.COM>, Jonathan Woo <JWoo516(a)AOL.COM>, Margery Lee <Marg(a)ucla.edu>, Musette Chan <Qui8cow(a)AOL.COM>, Steven Hu <Smartbeans(a)AOL.COM>, Thyda Chhor <thyda001(a)AOL.COM> Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!] From: Kwan <kwan887(a)jps.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 09:09:45 -0800 To: Helen Huang <Sweets637(a)AOL.COM>, Jenny Young <kbzxgqgirl(a)AOL.COM>, Jonathan Woo <JWoo516(a)AOL.COM>, Margery Lee <Marg(a)ucla.edu>, Musette Chan <Qui8cow(a)AOL.COM>, Steven Hu <Smartbeans(a)AOL.COM>, Thyda Chhor <thyda001(a)AOL.COM> Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~!] From: Kwan <kwan887(a)jps.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 09:09:45 -0800 -------------------- Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com (imo18.mx.aol.com [198.81.19.175]) by dry.jps.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA16198 for <kwan887(a)jps.net>; Wed, 31 Dec 1997 19:15:10 -0800 (PST) From: Bar111bie <Bar111bie(a)aol.com> Message-ID: <2e2dd6f8.34ab0a14(a)aol.com> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 22:14:26 EST To: kwan887(a)jps.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~! Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part0_883624466_boundary" Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) X-Mailer: Inet_Mail_Out (IMOv11) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_883624466_boundary Content-ID: <0_883624466(a)inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --part0_883624466_boundary Content-ID: <0_883624466(a)inet_out.mail.aol.com.2> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline From: Babytimd13 <Babytimd13(a)aol.com> Return-path: <Babytimd13(a)aol.com> To: Bar111bie(a)aol.com Subject: Fwd: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~! Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 03:42:58 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_883624466_boundary" --part1_883624466_boundary Content-ID: <0_883624466(a)inet_out.mail.aol.com.3> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --part1_883624466_boundary Content-ID: <0_883624466(a)inet_out.mail.aol.com.4> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline From: Babytimd13 <Babytimd13(a)aol.com> Return-path: <Babytimd13(a)aol.com> To: Rndy2(a)aol.com Subject: hey yall DO NOT delete this is the weirdest game....~! Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 03:56:13 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit In a message dated 97-12-28 19:03:18 EST, you write: << Begin... > = > First, write 1-11in a column. > Then in the first and second spaces, fill any two numbers you like. > Write two males names in the 3rd and 7th spaces. > Write anyone's name (like friends or family...) in the 4th, 5th, and >6th spaces. > Write four song titles in 8,9,10 and 11. > = > Finally, make a wish... > = > = > And here is the key for that game... > = > = > > > > > > > >You must tell (the number in space 2) people about this game in (the = >number in space 1) days in order to make your wish come true. > = > The name in 3 is the one you love. > The person in 7 is the one you like but can't work out. > You care most about the person you put in 4. > Fifth is the one you knows you very well. > The name in 6 is your lucky star. > The song in 8 is the song that matches with the person in 3. > The title in 9 is the song for 7. > The tenth space is the song telling you about your mind. > And 11 is the song telling what you feel for sex....... > = >> --part1_883624466_boundary-- --part0_883624466_boundary--

1 0