December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: SPECIAL REPORT: Censorware in the Stacks (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:58:05 -0700 > From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> > Subject: Re: SPECIAL REPORT: Censorware in the Stacks (fwd) > >Wrong, the LOC is for the people. It is there (originaly) to provide a > >reference listing of all documents published and therefore claiming copyright. > >Currently it is open to any legitimate research project. I have used it on a > > Any idea on what they define to be a "legitimate" research project? Something related to a project you're working on is my guest guess. I had a clear problem description and goal in mind both times I dealt with them. My experience is that just about any research organization like that simply wants some assurance of legitimacy regarding the use of resources in that institution, they got a bottem line they have to toe. In my various diggings I have *never* been turned away from any reference stack if I could provide them with clear descriptions and goals. Then again, I don't go in raving and ranting and making lot's of demands either... The first time I had reference to them was when I worked for the DoD during college ('80-'83 @ UT) when I had to do some research on a RTL project for Capt. Gene Barton of the US Army. Not that he would necessarily know anything about it. I made the requests for specific information through the engineering library at UT and they contacted both LoC and the Patent Office on prior art. I was designing a non-Von Neumann router from TTL random gates and needed to see how some folks had resolved some similar addressing (very sticky wicket that in regards RTL architectures) issue. The second time was when I was working for Austron here in Austin doing time reference standards (1210's, 2055's, 2000 & 5000 LORAN recievers - it you got one and it was done by triangle-nine it's mine) and needed to do some reference requests for one of the engineers (I unfortunately don't remember his name) into rf propogation models in the 10kHz range because of some problem the US Navy was having off Korea. Past that I don't know as there was some sort of security issue involved. Neither time did it take more than a couple of phone calls (numbers provided for me) and some faxes. I also don't believe that anyone on the other end know anything more about my projects other than the librarian on my end saying something like "I have a user who wants to request ...". YMMV of course. > hate to travel 3000 miles to research the Holocaust Lie, only to be told > that my research on how the Holocaust Lie was sold to support FDR and > Truman is an _illegitimate_ research project. You don't have to travel farther than your local public library. Now whether the librarian wants to spend their time working on your project is a whole 'nother (personal) issue. If you want to know more specifics I suggest you call information in DC and ask for the main number. From there you're on your own. I'm working on a small book proposal & ASL expansion pack regarding the Japanese parachute invasion of Palembang on Feb. 14, 1942 and it's possible I may need to see records there since the US Navy was part of the combined British-Dutch-French-US command in that area. If so, I'll be shure to pass along any experiences that I might have. I certainly hope to arrange an actual trip to Palembang in a couple of years. But I digress... ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Re: FCPUNX:Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendm
by David Magnay 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 19 Dec 97 at 11:58, Jim Burnes wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Dec 1997, David Honig wrote: ... > > > If one ever questions this in public, as Tim did, the liberal response > > is to show that unPC 'discrimination' is possible if humans are free, > > and then the dutiful citizen gladly sacrifices employers' liberty for > > their warm and fuzzy feelings. The first amendment is about what > > government can't do to you, not what your neighbor can or can't do. > > Yeah. The real question is what humans are free to do. The freedom > to do something is also the freedom *not* to do something. The > freedom to conduct a transaction (employing someone) must also be > the freedom not to conduct that transaction because the transaction > is voluntary. > Who said humans are free ? Which page is that written on ? Ooops, lost my copy. Your version must be wrong. Probably a spelling error. The _real_ question is HOW to determine what humans are free to do. Without a common acceptance of right, wrong and definition of freedom, it only comes from the sharp end of a gun. Just having a cosy chinwag in Congress, the UN or the European Parliament and agreeing on a code of conduct is not enuf if it is not accepted by the active parties. Many people sqeal about rights (and wrongs) but they are only right or wrong by some measure. If your enemy has a different measure, or refuses to accept your right/wrong criteria, you are stuffed. For some people, that measure is the US Constitution, for others the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, etc. However, all of these are only ARBITRARY agreements on commonly accepted points of view. If I disagree, they are absolutely worthless. So, but unless you stop me, I'll play by MY set of rules. If I want Kuwait, I'll take it. If I want Grenada, Chekoslovakia, Afghanistan or the Marshall Islands, I'll just take it. If I want to tap your phone, monitor your Bank account or stamp your licence with 666, I'll do it Oh buts that wrong, u cant do that. Well, who says I cant. You ?? Laugh..laugh..laugh. Where does it say that. Did God tell you ? Prove it then. No, well POQ. So if we have a Government OF the people, BY the poeple, FOR the people, we may have a chance of getting somewhere. (Oh well, we can always hope) DM --------------------------- David Magnay email: sdh(a)crafti.com.au ---------------------------

1 0

Coercive Monopolism vs Wimpyness
by Secret Squirrel 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>And, since Windows OS is so pitifully lousy, why do people continue to buy >it, even without the computer attached; why do they continue to upgrade, >even if it's so slow and bloated? Don't they realize Unix is better? >Don't they realize they're just making Billg richer? I use Linux primarily. People still buy Winblows for the same reasons I bought Winblows 95. Want to play a game from the store? Windows 95. Want to install a new image in your Flash RAM on your motherboard? DOS (Windows 95). Want to have vendor-produced drivers? Windows 95. Want to parse MS Turd documents? Windows 95 and MS Office. Want to use a Windows-specific bullshit class registration system at your university? Windows 95. Want to run that program your mother sends you and wants you to run? She uses Windows 95 because it was preinstalled on her machine, so you must use Windows 95 too. Some kind of bizarre hardware which the manufactuers won't release specs for? (The AWE32 is a good example. Eventually somebody got pissed and reverse engineered it.) Windows 95. Happened to buy a printer? It won't say "Yes! It works with Ghostscript!" In fact it won't say anything about hardware compatability. It'll just say "Windows drivers included" along with a list of a bunch of software that I don't want and don't need. So if it happens that the printer is nonstandard...Windows 95. Have a bunch of people in the office who don't care about platform compatability and pass around Windows-specific document types or programs? Windows 95. Have a bunch of people in the office who, simply because Windows and sometimes MacOS are taught as "computer education" in many universities and public schools can't use anything else? Windows 95. Have to use a university computer lab? The machines are probably running Windows 95. So you wind up with an incentive to use Windows 95 elsewhere. So...again, Windows 95. Want to have a working copy of PGP 5.0 while everybody else has started sending out DH-encrypted/signed messages and rolled DH keys? Windows 95. (Yeah, yeah. The source was released in book form.) This goes on and on and on. Sure there are counter arguments for these but it gets real touchy real quick. Ever try to pressure a game company into releasing Linux versions? Ever try to pressure an applications company to release Linux versions? Explanation and analysis: Microsoft spends millions on marketting. Linux, BSD, et al. simply don't have a massive marketting machine. The PC rags and TV shows like CNet are supported by Windows applications, Windows games, Microsoft, and platform-specific web sites. Microsoft has no qualms about outright lying in its marketting material. Look at the messages which display during Windows 95 installation for a good example. "What you want to do, and more, is now possible." Yeah. What if I want to have a decent telnet client? What if I want to have tons of free software? They don't qualify the statement, yet the Microsoft lackies think that Microsoft would never lie and it must be true. The Windows interface is "point and drool." This has the effect of attracting every lazy person possible. I say "lazy" because it's basically no work to remember "rm" rather than "left click and drag to the recycle bin." These people don't know how *anything* works on even the most basic level. The Linux/BSD/whatever developers aren't going to make an interface like that because they're competent, aren't trying to make money, don't want to cripple their platform with it, and they don't necessarily want to attract these people. Generally speaking, as "da web" has proven, if it takes no brains to use something people with no brain will be attracted to it in great numbers. Microsoft, their friends, and some of their enemies did everything they possibly could to break the web. HTML was designed as a relatively simple, platform independant method of storing information. The idea was that you could go throw in an image, but it was supposed to *augment* the message, not *be* the message. And regardless of what you did the page was supposed to be viewable from a text terminal. Netscape started by adding non-standard extensions to HTML, in effect encouraging people to make Netscape-specific web pages. Netscape Gold and other "web page designers" encourage people to release platform-specific web pages -- they *should* throw an error if somebody puts in an unnamed link. Then of course we had stuff like server-side image maps. And we have pages with frames which are impossible to correctly display in a text mode, and which bitch and moan and suggest you download Microsoft Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator/Communicator to read it. And I've seen pages which are nothing but graphics files -- but hey, they're okay because they display correctly in MSIE or Netscape. Microsoft continues its little jihad by perverting Java, which is supposed to be another platform-independant language, into a Windows-specific language. While they were at it both Microsoft and Netscape decided to start slinging HTML and nonstandard MIME types all over email and news postings. When you buy a prebuilt computer in most cases you don't have a choice. You have to get Windows 95, MSIE, and whatever other crap they decide to pile on. Normally this wouldn't be a problem and you would just go to another vendor but just about every single vendor is like this. When you buy hardware you pay for all sorts of Windows software. So now you have all kinds of (bad) Windows software, so there's another reason to use Windows. Microsoft knows this. For example, when you buy a scanner you get Windows software for it, absolutely no design specs, no compatability list, and in many cases they flat-out *won't* release design specs. When you call for technical support many (most?) places tell you to do something like this: "Okay. Go click on the 'My Computer' icon--" "Uh, I run Linux." "Uh, we don't support that." (Hint: It was a *hardware* problem, *not* a software problem, but go boot up into Windows just so we know it was broken. Oh, and you better have the latest version because that's all we support.) Many vendors only release drivers for whatever the latest and greatest version of Winblows is going to be. Windows 3.1 drivers are starting to get scarce. DOS drivers are basically nonexistant. Say, for instance, you purchase or receive Windows NT Workstation 4.0. You then go out and buy an AWE64. Creative Labs has stated that they aren't releasing a decent AWE64 driver for NT 4.0, but instead are targetting it at NT 5.0. Compare this with the UNIX world where, for the most part, things are platform independant and people like platform compatability. Most of the time I can run something on Linux which I can run on BSD which I can run on SunOS, etc.

1 0

heres your free web site!
by coufuojee82＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is a "ONE-TIME MESSAGE" you were randomly selected to receive this. You will be automatically deleted from this mailing list. ONLY REPLIES WILL BE KEPT. There is no need to reply to remove, you will receive no further mailings from us. NEW IMPROVED with FREE internet software! FREE bulk e mail system, two FREE web sites to use as you wish! (free space 2 - 6 K) one of your Free web sites is in this letter!, ongoing support (optional), and a lot, lot more! all included!, this, all when you order all four reports. That's worth $20 dollars alone ! PLUS act now and you will recived via e mail from 50,000 To-1000,000 !!! FREE filtered E-MAiL addresses!. ALL FOR YOU! This is not a pyramid! This is NOT a chain letter, and I did not send this in the post office mail! there is product, support, news letters and more! This is new and revised! ALL via e mail! \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\$\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ you are about to make at least $50,000 USD In about 90 days or less! Read the enclosed program...then read it again...then print it out to review. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Dear friend, The enclosed information is something I almost let slip through my fingers. Fortunately, sometime later I re-read everything and gave some thought and study to it. My name is Christopher Erickson. Two years ago, the corporation I worked at for the past twelve years down-sized and my position was eliminated. After unproductive job interviews, I decided to open my own business. Over the past year, I incurred many unforeseen financial problems. I owed my family, friends, and creditors over $35,000. The economy was taking a toll on my business and I just couldn't seem to make ends meet. I had to refinance and borrow against my home to support my family and struggling business. I truly believe it was wrong for me to be in debt like this. AT THAT MOMENT something significant happened in my life and I am writing to share my experience in hopes that this will change your life FOREVER....FINANCIALLY!!! In mid-December, I received this program via email. Six months prior to receiving this program I had been sending away for information on various business opportunities. All of the programs I received, in my opinion, were not cost effective. They were either too difficult for me to comprehend or the initial investment was too much for me to risk to see if they worked or not. One claimed I'd make a million dollars in one year...it didn't tell me I'd have to write a book to make it. But like I was saying, in December of '92 I received this program. I didn't send for it, or ask for it, they just got my name off a mailing list. THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!! After reading it several times, to make sure I was reading it correctly, I couldn't believe my eyes. Here was a MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON. I could invest as much as I wanted to start, without putting me further in debt. After I got a pencil and paper and figured it out, I would at least get my money back. After determining that the program is LEGAL and NOT A CHAIN LETTER, I decided "WHY NOT". Initially I sent out 10,000 emails. It only cost me about $15.00 for my time on-line. The great thing about email is that I didn't need any money for printing to send out the program, only the cost to fulfill my orders. I am telling you like it is, I hope it doesn't turn you off, but I promised myself that I would not "rip-off" anyone, no matter how much money it cost me!. In less than one week, I was starting to receive orders for REPORT #1. By January 13th, I had received 26 orders for REPORT #1. When you read the GUARANTEE in the program, you will see that "YOU MUST RECEIVE 20 ORDERS FOR REPORT #1 WITHIN TWO WEEKS. IF YOU DON'T, SEND OUT MORE PROGRAMS UNTIL YOU DO!" My first step in making $50,000 in 90 days was done. By January 30th, I had received 196 orders for REPORT #2. If you go back to the GUARANTEE, "YOU MUST RECEIVE 100 OR MORE ORDERS FOR REPORT #2 WITHIN TWO WEEKS. IF NOT, SEND OUT MORE PROGRAMS UNTIL YOU DO. ONCE YOU HAVE 100 ORDERS, THE REST IS EASY, RELAX, YOU WILL MAKE YOUR $50,000 GOAL." Well, I had 196 orders for REPORT #2, 96 more than I needed. So I sat back and relaxed. By March 19th, of my emailing of 10,000 packets, I received $58,000 with more coming in every day. I paid off ALL my debts and bought a much needed new car. Please take time to read the attached program, IT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER! Remember, it wont work if you don't try it. This program does work, but you must follow it EXACTLY! Especially the rules of not trying to place your name in a different place. It doesn't work, you'll lose out on a lot of money! REPORT #2 explains this. Always follow the guarantee, 20 orders for REPORT #1, and 100 or more orders for REPORT #2 and you will make $50,000 or more in about 90 days. I AM LIVING PROOF THAT IT WORKS !!! If you choose not to participate in this program, I'm sorry. It really is a great opportunity with little cost or risk to you. If you choose to participate, follow the program and you will be on your way to financial security. If you are a fellow business owner and you are in financial trouble like I was, or you want to start your own business, consider this a sign. I DID! Sincerely, Christopher Erickson PS Do you have any idea what 11,700 $5 bills ($58,000) look like piled up on a kitchen table? IT'S AWESOME! "THREW IT AWAY" "I had received this program before. I threw it away, but later wondered if I shouldn't have given it a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact to get a copy, so I had to wait until I was emailed another copy of the program. Eleven months passed, then it came. I DIDN'T throw this one away. I made $41,000 on the first try." Dawn W., Evansville, IN "NO FREE LUNCH" "My late father always told me, 'remember, Alan, there is no free lunch in life. You get out of life what you put into it.' Through trial and error and a somewhat slow frustrating start, I finally figured it out. The program works very well, I just had to find the right target group of people to email it to. So far this year, I have made over $63,000 using this program. I know my dad would have been very proud of me." Alan B., Philadelphia, PA A PERSONAL NOTE FROM THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS PROGRAM By the time you have read the enclosed information and looked over the enclosed program and reports, you should have concluded that such a program, and one that is legal, could not have been created by an amateur. Let me tell you a little about myself. I had a profitable business for ten years. Then in 1979 my business began falling off. I was doing the same things that were previously successful for me, but it wasn't working. Finally, I figured it out. It wasn't me, it was the economy. Inflation and recession had replaced the stable economy that had been with us since 1945. I don't have to tell you what happened to the unemployment rate...because many of you know from first hand experience. There were more failures and bankruptcies than ever before. The middle class was vanishing. Those who knew what they were doing invested wisely and moved up. Those who did not, including those who never had anything to save or invest, were moving down into the ranks of the poor. As the saying goes, "THE RICH GET RICHER AND THE POOR GET POORER." The traditional methods of making money will never allow you to "move up" or "get rich", inflation will see to that. You have just received information that can give you financial freedom for the rest of your life, with "NO RISK" and "JUST A LITTLE BIT OF EFFORT." You can make more money in the next few months than you have ever imagined. I should also point out that I will not see a penny of your money, nor anyone else who has provided a testimonial for this program. I have already made over FOUR MILLION DOLLARS! I have retired from the program after sending out over 16,000 programs. Now I have several offices which market this and several other programs here in the US and overseas. By the Spring, we wish to market the 'Internet' by a partnership with AMERICA ON LINE. Follow the program EXACTLY AS INSTRUCTED. Do not change it in any way. It works exceedingly well as it is now. Remember to email a copy of this exciting program to everyone that you can think of. One of the people you send this to may send out 50,000...and your name will be on every one of them!. Remember though, the more you send out, the more potential customers you will reach. So my friend, I have given you the ideas, information, materials and opportunity to become financially independent, IT IS UP TO YOU NOW! "THINK ABOUT IT" Before you delete this program from your mailbox, as I almost did, take a little time to read it and REALLY THINK ABOUT IT. Get a pencil and figure out what could happen when YOU participate. Figure out the worst possible response and no matter how you calculate it, you will still make a lot of money! Definitely get back what you invested. Any doubts you have will vanish when your first orders come in. IT WORKS! Paul Johnson, Raleigh, NC HERE'S HOW THIS AMAZING PROGRAM WILL MAKE YOU $$$$$$ Let's say that you decide to start small, just to see how it goes, and we'll assume you and all those involved send out 20,000 programs each. Let's also assume that the mailing receives a .5% response. Using a good list the response could be much better. Also many people will send out hundreds of thousands of programs instead of 20,000. But continuing with this example, you send out only 20,000 programs. With a .5% response, that is only 10 orders for REPORT #1. Those 10 people respond by sending out 20,000 programs each for a total of 200,000. Out of those .5%, 100 people respond and order REPORT #2. Those 100 mail out 20,000 programs each for a total of 2000,000. The .5% response to that is 1,000 orders for REPORT #3. Those 1,000 send out 20,000 programs each for a 2,000,000 total. The .5% response to that is 10,000 orders for REPORT #4. That's 10,000 five dollar bills for you. CASH!!!! Your total income in this example is $50 + $500 + $5000 + $50,000 for a total of $55,550!!!! REMEMBER FRIEND, THIS IS ASSUMING 1,990 OUT OF 2,000 PEOPLE YOU MAIL TO WILL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING... AND TRASH THIS PROGRAM! DARE TO THINK FOR A MOMENT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF EVERYONE OR HALF SENT OUT 100,000 PROGRAMS INSTEAD OF ONLY 2,000. Believe me, many people will do that and more! By the way, your cost to participate in this is practically nothing. You obviously already have an internet connection and email is FREE!!! REPORT#3 will show you the best methods for bulk emailing and purchasing email lists. THIS IS A LEGITIMATE,NOW VERY LEGAL, MONEY MAKING OPPORTUNITY. It does not require you to come in contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house except to get the mail. If you believe that someday you'll get that big break that you've been waiting for, THIS IS IT! Simply follow the instructions, and your dream will come true. This multi-level email order marketing program works perfectly...100% EVERY TIME. Email is the sales tool of the future. Take advantage of this non-commercialized method of advertising NOW!! The longer you wait, the more people will be doing business using email. Get your piece of this action!! MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING (MLM) has finally gained respectability. It is being taught in the Harvard Business School, and both Stanford Research and The Wall Street Journal have stated that between 50% and 65% of all goods and services will be sold throughout Multi-level Methods by the mid to late 1990's. This is a Multi-Billion Dollar industry and of the 500,000 millionaires in the US, 20% (100,000) made their fortune in the last several years in MLM. Moreover, statistics show 45 people become millionaires everyday through Multi-Level Marketing. INSTRUCTIONS We at Erris Mail Order Marketing Business, have a method of raising capital that REALLY WORKS 100% EVERY TIME. I am sure that you could use $50,000 to $125,000 in the next 90 days. Before you say "Bull", please read the program carefully. This is not a chain letter, but a NOW perfectly legal money making opportunity. Basically, this is what we do: As with all multi-level business, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Every state in the USA allows you to recruit new multi- level business partners, and we offer a product for EVERY dollar sent. YOUR ORDERS COME AND ARE FILLED THROUGH THE MAIL, so you are not involved in personal selling. You do it privately in your own home, store or office. This is the GREATEST Multi-level Mail Order Marketing anywhere: Step (1) Order all four 4 REPORTS listed by NAME AND NUMBER. Do this by ordering the REPORT from each of the four 4 names listed on the next page. For each REPORT, send $5 CASH and a SELF- ADDRESSED, STAMPED envelope (BUSINESS SIZE #10) to the person listed for the SPECIFIC REPORT. International orders should also include $2 extra for postage. It is essential that you specify the NAME and NUMBER of the report requested to the person you are ordering from. You will need ALL FOUR 4 REPORTS because you will be REPRINTING and RESELLING them. DO NOT alter the names or sequence other than what the instructions say. IMPORTANT: Always provide same-day service on all orders. Step (2) Replace the name and address under REPORT #1 with yours, moving the one that was there down to REPORT #2. Drop the name and address under REPORT #2 to REPORT #3, moving the one that was there to REPORT #4. The name and address that was under REPORT #4 is dropped from the list and this party is no doubt on the way to the bank. When doing this, make certain you type the names and addresses ACCURATELY! DO NOT MIX UP MOVING PRODUCT/REPORT POSITIONS!!! Step (3) Having made the required changes in the NAME list, save it as a text (.txt) file in it's own directory to be used with whatever email program you like. Again, REPORT #3 will tell you the best methods of bulk emailing and acquiring email lists. Step (4) Email a copy of the entire program (all of this is very important) to everyone whose address you can get your hands on. Start with friends and relatives since you can encourage them to take advantage of this fabulous money-making opportunity. That's what I did. And they love me now, more than ever. Then, email to anyone and everyone! Use your imagination! You can get email addresses from companies on the internet who specialize in email mailing lists. These are very cheap, 100,000 addresses for around $35.00. IMPORTANT: You won't get a good response if you use an old list, so always request a FRESH, NEW list. You will find out where to purchase these lists when you order the four 4 REPORTS. ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON ALL ORDERS!!! REQUIRED REPORTS ***Order each REPORT by NUMBER and NAME*** ALWAYS SEND A SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE AND $5 USD CASH FOR EACH ORDER REQUESTING THE SPECIFIC REPORT BY NAME AND NUMBER (International orders should also include $2 USD extra for postage) Add your e amil address when sending in for your report this is for updated information and continueing support (optional) that will be handed down by your sponcers pipeline. ______________________________________________________ REPORT #1 "HOW TO MAKE $250,000 THROUGH MULTI-LEVEL SALES" ORDER REPORT #1 FROM: A. Siegmund #57 Trakehnenstr. 13 53332 Bornheim, Germany ______________________________________________________ REPORT #2 "MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND MULTI-LEVEL SALES" J. Maze 15774 S. Lagrange Rd Suite #312 Orland Pk, IL 60462 USA ________________________________________________________ REPORT#3 "SOURCES FOR THE BEST MAILING LISTS" ORDER REPORT #3 FROM: B. Thompson 13504 Greencaslte ridge Tr. 404 Burtonsville MD. 20866 USA ______________________________________________________ REPORT #4 "EVALUATING MULTI-LEVEL SALES PLANS" ORDER REPORT #4 FROM: MUW #2 PO BOX 71442 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84171-0442 USA ______________________________________________________ CONCLUSION One of your free web sites can be registered at http://www.freeyellow.com/ .I am enjoying my fortune that I made by sending out this program. You too, will be making money in 20 to 90 days, if you follow the SIMPLE STEPS outlined in this mailing. To be financially independent is to be FREE. Free to make financial decisions as never before. Go into business, get into investments, retire or take a vacation. ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: <ziaza99(a)sh.hit.no> Received: from relay01.mail.aol.com (relay01.mail.aol.com [172.31.106.125]) by air21.mail.aol.com (v37.8) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 12:34:39 -0500 Received: from bonaly.hw.ac.uk (bonaly.hw.ac.uk [137.195.151.5]) by relay01.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with SMTP id MAA09338; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 12:29:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 12:29:50 -0500 (EST) From: ziaza99(a)sh.hit.no Received: from 007 (sdn-ts-047mdrelRP11.dialsprint.net) by bonaly.hw.ac.uk (MX V4.2 AXP) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:29:48 +0000 (GMT) To: ziaza99(a)sh.hit.no Comments: Authenticated sender is <ziaza99(a)sh.hit.no> Subject:free web site Message-ID: <19971222246ZAA24605(a)theman.hw.ac.uk> -

1 0

What is Gary L. Burnore Afraid Of? (was: Anon asshole still has no proof)
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

gburnore(a)netcom.com (Gary L. Burnore) ranted: > Still no proof that I am anti-remailer or support anti-remailers > Still no proof that I am anti-privacy or support anti-privacy You just provided it in the form of the Subject: line that YOU chose for this post -- "Anon asshole still has no proof". > Still accusations with no proof. Continuous for about a year. On and on and > on. Still no explination for why the whole thing started to begin with. > Because what the anon asshole is _REALLY_ upset about is true reason for his > obsession with me. > > > So the anon asshole won't answer. Can't answer. His/Her identity may become > know if he/her reveals the true reason for a year of obsession. Careful, Gary, your bigotry and paranoia are showing. My "accusation" has merely been at *ASK* you and Belinda Bryan why you demanded that Jeff Burchell turn over the user logs from his Huge Cajones Remailer over to DataBasix and what you intended to do with them after you obtained them. It seems to be you that's hiding the "true reason" for your own actions. What "proof" does one need to ask a question or two? Why do you resort to posting silly rants like this just to avoid answering those two questions? You are the one making the ridiculous accusations without proof, that a mythical "AnonAsshole <tm>" has supposedly done all matter of evil mischief towards you. And you conveniently try to discredit anyone who dares to criticize you anonymously of being this evil, mean ogre that you've invented.

1 0

Re: Lock and Load (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Subject: Re: Lock and Load (fwd) > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 97 01:45:53 -0500 > From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr(a)together.net> > >Would you be so kind as to give a specific example of a bolt action, > >semi-automatic, or automatic rifle that can't be loaded on safe? I have > >never seen a rifle that wouldn't allow this. > > Remington Model 8 semi-automatic rifle (circa 1905-1930+) there is one > (high three digit serial number made in 1906) chambered in .35 Remington > on the wall about 30 feet from where I am sitting. It's safety is right > side mounted and not only blocks the trigger but locks the bolt forward > both internally and externally by blocking track for the bolt handle, it > must be off to draw the bolt back to load the internal five round > pushdown magazine. Right mounted safety? Sounds like a lefties gun. Safeties are usualy thumb tripped which means they are on the left. The idea is you can safety the weapon without taking your finger from the trigger. That could explain the loading problem, guns built for lefties typicaly have all kinds of weird handling issues. It sounds to me like a real nightmare to load and use in the bush since you have to take your hand off the gun in order to get the safety off while you load another round while cycling the bolt through its action - eliminates snap shots that's for shure. Do you know if it is a lefty build? If so then it clearly isn't a military grade weapon since they are ubiquitously designed for right handed firers (at least until the last 20 yrs. or so). Once the clip is in place, top feed since you said "push down", does the safety prevent the cycling of ammo through the breech? Does it use a stripper clip or a carrier? You don't happen to know the type of action? Is this a military grade weapon or sport? > >A parallel pistol example would be nice too, if you're so inclined. > > I don't know of any pistols .... except that in the case of the > ubiquitous military .45 (1911A1) while one can easily insert a magazine > with the gun on safe, it isn't truly loaded til a round is chambered > which involves coming out of safe to rack the slide Interesting since the 1911 I use doesn't exhibit this ... I don't have a problem loading it irrespecitive of the safety. If the safety is on the hammer is blocked from the bottem by a lever. You can put ammo in it, cock it via the slide, etc. Just can't pull the trigger. Will have to look more into this... Thanks for the info. Merry Christmas! ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability--Part I
by Paul Bradley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> You Own Your Own Posts: You own your own words. This means that you > are responsible for the words that you post to Nym and that > reproduction of those words without your permission in any medium > outside of the Nym mailing list may be challenged by you, the > author. I am sure I need not outline for the members of the list the reasons why such copyright supporting drivel is not really in the spirit of the list, no-one owns my words, not me, nor anyone else, copyrights and patents infringe true free speech. Datacomms Technologies data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul(a)crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul(a)cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

2 1

For Smart People Only!
by hot8762＠hotmail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Do you need an International Driver's License? Before answering, ask yourself these questions! Do I want to avoid points on my driver's license? Do I want to avoid paying fines? Do I want to avoid being forced to attend driver's education classes? Would I like to show a foreign driver's license when I get stopped? Would I like to show a foreign driver's license when I check into a hotel? Would I like to show an International Driver's License to get admitted to night spots? Would I like to have anonymous identification for private or other reasons? If your answer is "Yes!" to any of these questions, you need a Macronesian International Driver's License! For details on how to obtain a genuine Macronesian International Driver's License, call 1-602-735-3970 and leave your name, phone number, and best times to call you back. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// The above message was brought to you by PlusNet Marketing & Distributors. We market or distribute any product or service by bulk E-mail and by traditional marketing media. For information, call 1-513-763-3862. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1 0

Re: Civil War Crypto Question... (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Sun, 21 Dec 97 21:46:22 PST > From: jim(a)mentat.com (Jim Gillogly) > Subject: Re: Civil War Crypto Question... > > Jim Choate skribis: > > On pp. 43 - 44 [of Hagerman's "The American Civil War..."] > > ... a 'cipher disk' whereby the Union was able to > > change their telegraph codes on an hourly schedule. It was apparently very > > effictive in dealing with taps and such. > > > > Anyone know of another source that discusses this disk? I looked in Applied > > There's a very brief mention of a disk in "Masked Dispatches: Cryptograms > and Cryptology in American History, 1775-1900", available from the NSA > Central Security Service. (Series 1, Pre-World War 1, Volume 1, United > States Cryptologic History), Center for Cryptologic History, by Ralph > E. Weber, 1993. Thanks for the reference. > On page 110 he says: "The North, on the other hand, adopted a handy "on-line" > means of changing the basic flag code by prearrangement or at will, even within > the act of transmission. This was done with a disk, in which the alphabet on > the inner disk revolved against an outer ring of flag combination, enabling an > instant change of code." > > My impression from this and from the chapter summary is that the disk was > used for flag codes but not telegraphy. For telegraphy the Union apparently > used a word-based route transposition that Friedman found unimpressive. Actualy it was used for telegraphy and flags. You see Mahan, the inventor of the disk had also just invented the first ever alphabetic flag system. Because of this system, instead of the wig-wag system others used, McClellan was the first general in history to change his orders of attack 3 times in 3 days *and* win the battle. The problem on the Peninsula was the land was too flat and the woods too thick to use it (see my original references around the same few pages). Friedman? Who the hell is Friedman? None of my references has anyone by that named listed, let alone involved. McClellan was the general in charge of the Army of the Potomac. Meyer was in charge of the Signal Corp, which at the time was responsible for tactical communications for McClellan. Originaly Meyer intended to use his new flag system but because the terrain, flat and wooded, on the Peninsula they found they weren't reliable. They were also using the balloons from the Union Aeronautic Department under Lowe. They were quite effective, haven't found out if they used Meyer's signal system. The flip side was the fully civilian Military Telegraph under Stager which handled strategic telegraphy was fighting Meyer for control of the various communications along technological boundaries. At this time, while they were fighting the South and each other, they brought in some Beardslee equipment (a rail-based portable telegraph system) which apparently didn't work well at all. The Beardslee system was the first use by an American army of portable telegraph equipment, it ran between McClellan's headquarters to Stoneman's at Mechanicsville. Apparently one of the chief problems was that wagons and people kept cutting the lines. Merry Christmas! ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

3 2

List of reliable remailers
by Raph Levien 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I operate a remailer pinging service which collects detailed information about remailer features and reliability. To use it, just finger remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu There is also a Web version of the same information, plus lots of interesting links to remailer-related resources, at: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/remailer-list.html This information is used by premail, a remailer chaining and PGP encrypting client for outgoing mail. For more information, see: http://www.c2.org/~raph/premail.html For the PGP public keys of the remailers, finger pgpkeys(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu This is the current info: REMAILER LIST This is an automatically generated listing of remailers. The first part of the listing shows the remailers along with configuration options and special features for each of the remailers. The second part shows the 12-day history, and average latency and uptime for each remailer. You can also get this list by fingering remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu. $remailer{'cyber'} = '<alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net> alpha pgp'; $remailer{"mix"} = "<mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek ksub reord ?"; $remailer{"replay"} = "<remailer(a)replay.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut post ek"; $remailer{"jam"} = "<remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek"; $remailer{"winsock"} = "<winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub reord ?"; $remailer{'nym'} = '<config(a)nym.alias.net> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"squirrel"} = "<mix(a)squirrel.owl.de> cpunk mix pgp pgponly hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{'weasel'} = '<config(a)weasel.owl.de> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"reno"} = "<middleman(a)cyberpass.net> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek reord ?"; $remailer{"cracker"} = "<remailer(a)anon.efga.org> cpunk mix remix pgp hash ksub esub latent cut ek reord post"; $remailer{'redneck'} = '<config(a)anon.efga.org> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"bureau42"} = "<remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org> cpunk mix pgp ksub hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{"neva"} = "<remailer(a)neva.org> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub ?"; $remailer{"lcs"} = "<mix(a)anon.lcs.mit.edu> mix"; $remailer{"medusa"} = "<medusa(a)weasel.owl.de> mix middle" $remailer{"McCain"} = "<mccain(a)notatla.demon.co.uk> mix middle"; $remailer{"valdeez"} = "<valdeez(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"arrid"} = "<arrid(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"hera"} = "<goddesshera(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"htuttle"} = "<h_tuttle(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp hash latent cut post ek"; catalyst(a)netcom.com is _not_ a remailer. lmccarth(a)ducie.cs.umass.edu is _not_ a remailer. usura(a)replay.com is _not_ a remailer. remailer(a)crynwr.com is _not_ a remailer. There is no remailer at relay.com. Groups of remailers sharing a machine or operator: (cyber mix reno winsock) (weasel squirrel medusa) (cracker redneck) (nym lcs) (valdeez arrid hera) This remailer list is somewhat phooey. Go check out http://www.publius.net/rlist.html for a good one. Last update: Thu 23 Oct 97 15:48:06 PDT remailer email address history latency uptime ----------------------------------------------------------------------- hera goddesshera(a)juno.com ------------ 5:03:45 99.86% nym config(a)nym.alias.net +*#**#**### :34 95.82% redneck config(a)anon.efga.org #*##*+#**** 2:00 95.44% mix mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com +++ ++++++* 19:18 95.27% squirrel mix(a)squirrel.owl.de -- ---+--- 2:34:19 95.16% cyber alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net *++***+ ++ 11:26 95.11% replay remailer(a)replay.com **** *** 10:06 94.93% arrid arrid(a)juno.com ----.------ 8:50:34 94.41% bureau42 remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org --------- 3:38:29 93.53% cracker remailer(a)anon.efga.org + +*+*+*+ 16:32 92.80% jam remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca + +*-++++ 24:14 92.79% winsock winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net -..-..---- 9:59:18 92.22% neva remailer(a)neva.org ------****+ 1:03:02 90.39% valdeez valdeez(a)juno.com 4:58:22 -36.97% reno middleman(a)cyberpass.net 1:01:28 -2.65% History key * # response in less than 5 minutes. * * response in less than 1 hour. * + response in less than 4 hours. * - response in less than 24 hours. * . response in more than 1 day. * _ response came back too late (more than 2 days). cpunk A major class of remailers. Supports Request-Remailing-To: field. eric A variant of the cpunk style. Uses Anon-Send-To: instead. penet The third class of remailers (at least for right now). Uses X-Anon-To: in the header. pgp Remailer supports encryption with PGP. A period after the keyword means that the short name, rather than the full email address, should be used as the encryption key ID. hash Supports ## pasting, so anything can be put into the headers of outgoing messages. ksub Remailer always kills subject header, even in non-pgp mode. nsub Remailer always preserves subject header, even in pgp mode. latent Supports Matt Ghio's Latent-Time: option. cut Supports Matt Ghio's Cutmarks: option. post Post to Usenet using Post-To: or Anon-Post-To: header. ek Encrypt responses in reply blocks using Encrypt-Key: header. special Accepts only pgp encrypted messages. mix Can accept messages in Mixmaster format. reord Attempts to foil traffic analysis by reordering messages. Note: I'm relying on the word of the remailer operator here, and haven't verified the reord info myself. mon Remailer has been known to monitor contents of private email. filter Remailer has been known to filter messages based on content. If not listed in conjunction with mon, then only messages destined for public forums are subject to filtering. Raph Levien

1 0