December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
by Alan Horowitz 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> There are businesses that _only_ list their 800 numbers, and you can't > find out the real phone number associated with them through directory > assistance. I'll leave it to others to call such a joint and give their name, address, and credit card number to such an establishment. > It's especially annoying when they've got an in-state or other non-nation-wide > 800 number, or when you're calling from outside the US, especially when > they're a business you'd like to be able to reach from anywhere, any time, > like the travel agent your office uses Your straining my credulity to claim that you can't get ahold of the regular phone number of them. Come on, are you 7 years old? > And they may _only_ have > the bank of phones that's got ANI service on it, and not have other phones. I don't think phone service is sold that way.

3 3

ViaCrypt pgp v.4
by Thomas C. Allard 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Well, my site just got ViaCrypt pgp version 4 (Personel Edition) and it was the first I'd heard of it. None of my utilities that worked with the old ViaCrypt pgp 2.7.1 seem to work under version 4 (the script that checks signatures dies, as does the exmh interface which can no longer find my personal keys). I assume that these are mostly due to changes in the command-line options, although I can find no list of what exactly has changed. But my REAL question is will this version of pgp be compatible with the international versions? If not, I'd just assume revert to pgp 2.6.2 from MIT. rgds-- TA (tallard(a)frb.gov) I don't speak for the Federal Reserve Board, it doesn't speak for me. pgp fingerprint: 10 49 F5 24 F1 D9 A7 D6 DE 14 25 C8 C0 E2 57 9D

1 0

Practical Solutions at USENIX SECURITY Symposium
by Cynthia Deno 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The 6th USENIX Security Symposium - Focusing on Applications of Cryptography - is coming to San Jose. You may want to attend. July 22-July 25, 1996 6TH USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM Fairmont Hotel, San Jose, California Sponsored by the USENIX Association Co-sponsored by UniForum in cooperation with the Computer Emergency Response Team There will be refereed papers, panel presentations, invited talks, Birds-of-a-Feather sessions, and an informal Vendor Display. The symposium is offering two days of tutorials. Tutorial speakers include Ed DeHard, CERT; Dan Geer, Open Market; Jon Rochlis, BBN Planet; Marcus Ranum, V-One; Matt Bishop, UC Davis; and Bruce Schneier, Counterpane Systems. Practical solutions to UNIX security will be dissected, debated, and refined. New research on public key issues, electronic commerce, safe working areas, and secure communication. There will also be sessions on the latest version of Pretty Good Privacy (PGP), Internet Firewalls, and the C2Net Privacy model. Tutorial topics include: Implementing Cryptography; World Wide Web and Internet Security; Comparison of UNIX Security Tools; and Security for Software Developers. UniForum has organized a track especially for managers. It offers a comprehensive overview of computer security as it relates to open systems from a manager's perspective. The UniForum panel sessions cover: Security and Privacy; Electronic Commerce; Cryptography Infrastructure; and Cryptography and the Law. Admission is free and open to the public for the small, table-top Vendor Display taking place Wednesday July 24, Noon - 2:00 pm and 3:00 - 7:00 pm in the Fairmont Hotel. Call Cynthia Deno 408 335 9445. Complete program and registration information is available on the USENIX home page on the Web at http://www. usenix.orgemail or email to info(a)usenix.org (state "send security conference" in body of your message). /-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/- | Cynthia Deno | USENIX | | Tel: 408 335 9445 | The UNIX and Advanced Computing Systems | | Fax: 408 335 5327 | Technical and Professional Association | | cynthia(a)USENIX.org | | | Check out USENIX on the Net..........http://www.USENIX.org | /-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-

1 0

Encrytions over multiple platforms
by tangent＠alpha.c2.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Does anyone know of a hard-drive/partition encrytion program that has been ported to both DOS and Linux/UNIX based systems? I am searching for a system that, obviously, allows both reading and writing of secure/encrytped data. You help will be greatly appreciated. -- Tangent <tangent(a)alpha.c2.org>

1 0

Sternlight on C'punks
by David Lesher 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: maldrich(a)grci.com > (note that Sternlight actually had his OWN usenet newsgroup), there's the > fear that DS will start a flame thrower exchange with anyone, regardless > of topic. AND, he'll keep posting about it. Relentlessly. The solution to SternFUD infection is patience. Every single time, he gets bored & lonely after everyone kill-files him. Then he goes in remission [or maybe it's back to the SternFord Clinic...] for weeks; reappearing somewhere else. > God bless 'em, but it's time to add another line to the c'punks > net.loon warning file. Sure! But I'd not think that anyone here needed to be warned. Hell, even reporters know about him.... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz(a)nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

1 0

RE: (fwd) krypt13i.zip Enkryptonator: Homonymous key encryption system, R. Newton
by geeman＠shellx.best.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

And all those fools like Diffie and Rivest, Shamir, Adelman, etc, well I guess they missed the boat big time by missing this, huh? Hint: misplaced commas, are always a tipoff to, uhhhhh ... less than stellar shall we say, intellectual bona fides. Boy I'm sure glad I don't have to remember those orney key anymore! : Enkryptonator is a newly developed encryption system based on the : principles of homonymous key cryptography invented by Enkryptonator Co. : Homonymous key systems are an exiciting, new breakthrough, that solve : the 'key management' problem without resorting to 'public key' : cryptography. No more unwieldy, impossible to remember, binary keys. : Enkryptonator is easy to use. Because of Enkryptonator's unique design : no one who intercepts your encryption in an unauthorized manner can : decrypt your file -- even if he knows the key of encryption! Everyone : has a right to privacy and Enkryptonator will provide you a means of : securing your personal and private concerns from unwanted intruders.

1 0

Re: Why <jf_avon@citenet.net> was blocked.
by Jean-Francois Avon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 15 Jul 96 at 21:28, Anonymous Remail Service wrote: > >On 13 Jul 96 at 22:22, root(a)mail.demon.net wrote: > > > >Could you please explain me why my message was blocked? > > Because you're an asshole? Why in the world would you ask the > entire fucking cypherpunks list, instead of just > root(a)mail.demon.net, to "please explain me[SIC] why my message was > blocked?" You are constantly harassing, so you were blocked. Deal > with it. me Dear flamer, Obviously, you did not learn to read. Go back to school. I asked the root(a)mail.demon.net to explain why I was blocked and I asked CPunks to reply to the post "below", which was my original question. What I asked on the CPunks list was the following: Is the fact that a realdeal.exe /per (wiped with zeroes) processed drive weakens the idea encryption of a Secure Drive 1.4a'ed drive? So, dear anonymous coward, go to hell. Jean-Francois Avon - -- DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee Limoges porcelain, silverware and crystal JFA Technologies R&D consultants: physicists technologists and engineers. PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i Comment: PGP Public key: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon iQEVAgUBMeqeosiycyXFit0NAQFgbQgAnsRkMewRP8VezehwytWIcIKh/ty2UVQo /rh8BhUW+VePXCpL1rudLzr9ZWaq6akPTkpA5HHmDLARGMw2fu/0ZSuS/OSlGgz6 sKSXbKtTHqVCn+mOvpl2+lBD5bt4LTIoanY9a/uQ6rt5pZG9B4m5ztyM945vY62C QVyfvqEh1c2Iqbbud9BmeLnmAoaM0cXQJdeyhOerZ/38k+2/sUXOWtVlz3h1Rf6g 3SptAJ9wdsbdDPBuy0AC3MIQHiTgGAClDDOZAbsIB3v4NapqedktdcyGXQj9XKpF O6qn6rEnWhek0JrDVFBwyXbXu9JgQfqNetd7a5jvDM57bxBIpifA4A== =1T1A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
by shamrock＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 19:37 7/15/96, Alan Horowitz wrote: [...] >> It's especially annoying when they've got an in-state or other >>non-nation-wide >> 800 number, or when you're calling from outside the US, especially when >> they're a business you'd like to be able to reach from anywhere, any time, >> like the travel agent your office uses > > Your straining my credulity to claim that you can't get ahold of the >regular phone number of them. Come on, are you 7 years old? How do you get a hold of the phone number if you don't know the location of the company, they aren't on the net, and don't have the US phone numbers CD-ROM handy? I am 33 and have yet to figure this one out... -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred. Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November. Vote Harry Browne for President.

4 3

Home Made Telephone Voice Changer
by Jerome Tan 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I am not sure if this area is right for asking information on how to make home made voice changer for telephones... If anyone know, please share. Thanks!

1 0

Re: CookieScan 0.0 rev 0
by Christopher Hull 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Subject: Re: CookieScan 0.0 rev 0 >Sent: 7/15/96 4:57 PM >Received: 7/15/96 6:01 PM >From: Jeff Weinstein, jsw(a)netscape.com >To: Christopher Hull, nozefngr(a)apple.com >CC: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > >Christopher Hull wrote: >> What I imagine is a little utility that would >> display the cookies stashed on a machine and >> give the user the option to either delete or >> <snicker> edit </snicker> any given cookie. >> (Hey, it¹s *your* computer, not the website¹s). > > I doubt that you will have much luck here. Many (most??) sites >that use cookies tend to encode or obscure them so that they are not >human readable. Certainly anyone doing something questionable >will obscure their cookies so that they will not be user readable >or editable. > I agree. Editing is problematic. It would be difficult to decode intentionally hidden information. The user may suspect strange and not obvious stuff in a site's given cookie. Then what may happen is the user will "vote with their mouse" and stop using a site that encripts cookie data (or perhaps not). In any case the user will at least have the knowledge that the cookie exists. Those that do not encrypt may provide other interesting information. -Chris ... ... smtp: nozefngr(a)apple.com .. page: 1.800.680.7351 .. http: http://virtual.net/Personal/nozefngr/ .. icbm: lat37*21'.lon121*5' .. .. the kabuki project: http://remarque.berkeley.edu/kabuki/

2 1