December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Fingerprinting annoyance
by remailer＠2005.bart.nl 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

in connection with a character and fitness report i have been asked to supply a review board with a set of my fingerprints i have never been fingerprinted before i am not very keen on the idea now of course refusing will attract suspicion short of getting someone else to put their fingers in ink for me does anyone have a cute method by which to obscure my prints on those cute little cards without it being obvious? i can fill out and manipulate the card myself i just need a working method. is there no privacy advocate who can help me?

9 20

Re: Defeating fingerprints
by droelke＠rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > Burglars and safecrackers sand the ridges off. > > This sounds like it'd work, but quite tedious. > Two words - "power tools" !!! ;-) I've sanded my finger tips down rather well with a belt sander and a fine grit belt on numerous occasions. While I've speculated that I probably wouldn't leave much of a finger print, I've never actually tried to take prints after such an operation. Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------ Dan Oelke Alcatel Network Systems droelke(a)aud.alcatel.com Richardson, TX

1 0

RE: Why does the state still stand:
by blanc 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: Hal [on the idea of companies operating fully anonymously] It might be interesting to make a list of all the problems people can think of why this idea won't work, paired with proposed solutions and workarounds - sort of a mini FAQ for this important (some might say ultimate) cypherpunk model. ..................................................................... I think this is a much needed discussion - in particular as it comes at a time when Uni is is "somewhat disconcerted" at the defeatist attitude of some cypherpunks and since TCMay is getting ready to read us the Cypherpunks Bill of Rights regarding the subsidizatoin of other's people's cyber existence (heh). 3 problems which immediately come to mind: . What if someone, hired on one occasion but fired at another, decides in anger to "turn coat" and report everyone to the IRS (or other fine government agency)? . What if a company does not pay as expected - other than adopting Assassination Politics, what method could an employee use towards getting their expected remuneration for work done? . Wouldn't everyone need to have two jobs (or source of regularly accepted cash), in order to be able to pay for services where suppliers do not accept virtual cash transactions? (TCM has mentioned before about the need to pay for some things in tiny quantities - like quarters for a phone call, etc.) .. Blanc

4 3

Re: Why does the state still stand:
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 04:35 PM 5/14/96 -0700, Hal wrote: >I think the intention then is to create "fully anonymous" companies. >These would be organizations whose principals and employees are known >only by pseudonyms, even to each other. Their only contact is >electronic, via an anonymous network. And the employees are paid in >anonymous ecash, which they don't pay taxes on since it is unreported >income. > >These companies produce products or services which they offer for sale >across the net. They accept payment in ecash, either from end users or >from other companies. > >Such companies would be illegal, with everyone involved subject to >criminal penalties for tax evasion (and no doubt a myriad of other >violations). But because the anonymity is protected cryptographically, >the government is helpless to learn the true identities of anyone >involved. The companies continue to successfully sell their products >and services, advertising and recruiting openly from anonymous sources, >and there is nothing the government can do about it. The goal, obviously, is to make the cost of collection of $1 in taxes sufficiently expensive so that they can't do it economically. But let me draw an analogy: The easiest form of shooting is paper target practice: The target is fixed. More difficult is trap and skeet, where the target moves. More difficult still is hunting, where the target (animals) is at least somewhat intelligent and usually very mobile, as well as camouflaged. This is analogous to encryption. But the most difficult form of shooting is war, in which the "target" can shoot back. If a computer model could be constructed of it, I think you'd find that the most effective way to avoid taxation is to invest money to target those doing the collection. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that it would probably cost less than 10 cents to prevent the collection of $1 worth of tax, and probably closer to a penny. Any analysis of the destruction of the state is incomplete without considering such a scenario. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

2 1

Past one terabit/second on fiber
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In the April 1996 issue of Fiber Optic Product news, there is an article on a Lucent Technologies (formerly Bell Labs...no relation...sigh...) product which wavelength-multiplexes quantity 8, 2.5 Gb/second signals on a single fiber, for a total of 20 Gb/sec. This is a real, purchaseable system. On the same page is a somewhat more experimental system, done by Corning and Siemens, in which eight channels at 10 Gb/sec each were transmitted on a single Corning fiber. "Wow", I said. Far faster than the 2.5 Gb/sec transmission that is currently fairly standard for long-haul fiber trunks. I wasn't prepared, however, for page 38, in an article titled "Research Teams Achieve 1 Trillion bits a Second." In fact, three separate groups did this. I copy the article below. CP relevance? Well, the justification the government uses to regulate the airwaves, via the FCC, is that the available bandwidth is limited, which it is. But that argument has never been true with fiber, at least in theory, and is becoming even less true in practice. For example, that recent flap over Internet-based long-distance telephone interconnects (LD companies don't want competition) is based on the fact that the normal providers of these services want to get their dime a minute rates come hell or high water. Sure, that's a might cheaper than it was a decade ago. But with fiber transmission probably less than 1/100th the cost of older coaxial transmission systems, per connection, it is unclear why they're even continuing to meter LD phone calls. Even if we only consider that 20 Gb/second fiber from Lucent, that is equivalent to about 300,000 simultaneous voice calls. With a standard, 36-fiber cable, that represents 18x300,000 two-way calls, or about 4.8 million calls. This is probably far greater than the maximum number of people on LD in the US at any given time, and that's just a single cable trunk. If we assume that the fiber cable costs $1/meter per fiber, and the cost of trenching, burial, and interconnects raise this to $10/meter/fiber, and if we generously assume that the average LD call goes 3000 miles (5,000,000m), that call occupies 1/150,000th of a $50 million fiber for a few minutes. If we suppose that the fiber has to gross $100,000,000 per year to pay for itself, and even if it's only operating at an average 10% load level(both assumptions are pessimistic, that only works out to a cost of 1.3 cents per minute per call. That's why these LD phone companies are so scared: If we can transmit Internet on fiber, that fiber can accept this extra traffic at very low marginal cost. Part of article follows: "Research teams Achieve 1 Trillion bits a second" Debra Norman, Editor in Chief. Three research teams achieved their ultimate goal by sending the most information possible over optical fiber. The scientists, including a 12-member group from AT&T Research, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, reported in post-deadline papers at the Optical Fiber Conference held recently in San Jose, Calif., that they had sent one terabit of information over non-zero-dispersion fiber in a second's time. In short, it is similar to transmitting the contents of 1,000 copies of a 30-volume encyclopedia in one second. The researchers had not expected to send that much data until at least the year 2000. In the paper, the group described a 1 Tb/s transmission experiment that utilized WDM [wavelength division multiplexing] and polarization multiplexing. The outputs of 25 lasers were multiplexed using star couplers and waveguide grating routers. The wavelengths ranged from 1542 nm (channel 1) to 1561.2 nm (channel 25) with 100 GHz channel spacing. All lasers were external-cavity lasers except for channel 16, which used a DFB laser. Four of the laser outputs (channels 10,11,17, and 25) were amplified and filtered before multiplexing. The multiplexed wavelengths were then amplified and propagatedthrough an polarization beamsplitter to align al the polarizations. Polarization controllers at the output of each laser allowed independent polarization control for each source. The 25 co-polarized wavelengths were split by a 3-dB coupler, separatedly modulated by LiNbO3 Mach-Zehnder modulators, and then recombined with orthogonal polarizations in a PBS. The modulators have a small-signal bandwidth of 18 GHz and built-in polarizers. The 20 Gb/s NRZ drive signals were produced by electronically multiplexing two 10-Gb/s 215-1 pseudorandom bit streams using a commercial GaAs multiplexer. Two other groups from Japan, Fujitsu and Nippon Telephone and Telegraph Co., also submitted papers reporting that they reached the terabit mark. All three groups achieved the record with different experiments. Scientists from NTT demonstrated 100 Gb/s x 10 channel (1 Tb/s), error-free transmission of all the 10 channels over a 40 km dispersion-shifted fiber using a low-noise single supercontinuum WDM source fitted with a newly developed arrayed-waveguide grating demultiplexer/multiplexer. By fully utilizing the super-broad bandwidth of the SC spectra over 200 nm, up to 5 Tb/s would be possible. Fujitsu researchers achieved 1.1 Tb/s (55 wavelengths x 20 Gb/s) WDM transmission over 150 km of 1.3 mm [?] zero-dispersion singlemode fiber using preemphasis and dispersion compensating fiber with a negative dispersion slope. BER [bit error rate] degradation was not observed in any channel, even without channel-by-channel dispersion adjustment. [end of quoted portion] Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

3 2

PGPShell & Eudora
by Michael E. Carboy 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

While trying to solve a corrupted clearsig problem with Eudora 2.2 and PGPShell, I noticed comments in the c-punks archives on this same problem. I wanted to pass on that Aegis Research's PGPShell "Beta4" version solves the problem and does "preprocess" the message before signing so that Eudora won't wreck it. The shell can be downloaded at http://aegisrc.com. It is self-extracting and, if installed in your existing PGPShell directory will create a subdirectory named "Pretty~1" (no, I am not kidding) and then install the new .exe there. Regards, MEC Michael E. Carboy carboy(a)hooked.net carboy(a)carboy.com Key fingerprint = C9 E9 79 12 43 76 A2 DB 1A 72 FD 04 F2 03 6F 8A -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzDwxdIAAAEEAMmDaOXoZczvK4R7vH7ql+0sY/oHyqdtsjuOG8jbObnFjh2N jh3TAxyXGb83xmsm6Eb6muXf6oZJdTIzO7UuSwKh+afLg6un+LU7S/VTFTUf4QNq T1e2jZxcr33SFUxiKN7q83GkZhHyY1EeM/O8pGX+JhMANMv7gf9JSEYWhfvhAAUT tCVNaWNoYWVsIEUuIENhcmJveSA8Y2FyYm95QGhvb2tlZC5uZXQ+iQCVAwUQMPDG Lv9JSEYWhfvhAQF2VQQAqMj60pWt3+jZow8q/DFiM9Jw73rii2deJwfdju9vGWgU S6Se5TegVYlti8mWLF+mRSldEnRIKZs7mycW9YlVmfxa+uM2sTceoDIACkZy1MWF ULLeIzFDreR2YZLAVMQ4ToWTkRS2T+/jM8RQEMakPCYDIKBzCIuRQ7J+jmpR+Fs= =79nx -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

[NOISE] Unsub Kit
by Dave Del Torto 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Grin-noise of the Day. Typos are (sic) as found. Reply-noise to me, not the list (please). Don't forget to rinse and repeat. dave ................................. cut here ................................. From: KJ Fisher <FISHERKJ(a)SNYDELAB.DELHI.EDU> > someonme get me off this fucking mailing list First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit. Then follow these directions. The kit will most likely be the standard no-fault type. Depending on requirements, System A and/or System B can be used. When operating System A, depress lever and a plastic dalkron unsubscriber will be dispensed through the slot immediately underneath. When you have fastened the adhesive lip, attach connection marked by the large "X" outlet hose. Twist the silver- coloured ring one inch below the connection point until you feel it lock. The kit is now ready for use. The Cin-Eliminator is activated by the small switch on the lip. When securing, twist the ring back to its initial condition, so that the two orange lines meet. Disconnect. Place the dalkron unsubscriber in the vacuum receptacle to the rear. Activate by pressing the blue button. The controls for System B are located on the opposite side. The red release switch places the Cin-Eliminator into position; it can be adjusted manually up or down by pressing the blue manual release button. The opening is self- adjusting. To secure after use, press the green button, which simultaneously activates the evaporator and returns the Cin-Eliminator to its storage position. You may log off if the green exit light is on over the evaporator . If the red light is illuminated, one of the Cin-Eliminator requirements has not been properly implemented. Press the "List Guy" call button on the right of the evaporator . He will secure all facilities from his control panel. To use the Auto-Unsub, first undress and place all your clothes in the clothes rack. Put on the velcro slippers located in the cabinet immediately below. Enter the shower, taking the entire kit with you. On the control panel to your upper right upon entering you will see a "Shower seal" button. Press to activate. A green light will then be illuminated immediately below. On the intensity knob, select the desired setting. Now depress the Auto-Unsub activation lever. Bathe normally. The Auto-Unsub will automatically go off after three minutes unless you activate the "Manual off" override switch by flipping it up. When you are ready to leave, press the blue "Shower seal" release button. The door will open and you may leave. Please remove the velcro slippers and place them in their container. If you prefer the ultrasonic log-off mode, press the indicated blue button. When the twin panels open, pull forward by rings A & B. The knob to the left, just below the blue light, has three settings, low, medium or high. For normal use, the medium setting is suggested. After these settings have been made, you can activate the device by switching to the "ON" position the clearly marked red switch. If during the unsubscribing operation, you wish to change the settings, place the "manual off" override switch in the "OFF" position. You may now make the change and repeat the cycle. When the green exit light goes on, you may log off and have lunch. Please close the door behind you.

1 0

Java & signed applets
by E. ALLEN SMITH 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This has some mention of signed applets et al, so I thought it was applicable. -Allen From: IN%"rre(a)weber.ucsd.edu" 11-MAY-1996 23:06:27.24 From: Phil Agre <pagre(a)weber.ucsd.edu> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below. You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, send an empty message to rre-help(a)weber.ucsd.edu =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:59:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Home Page Press, Inc." <staff(a)hpp.com> To: staff(a)hpp.com Subject: JAVA BLACK WIDOWS - SUN DECLARES WAR JAVA BLACK WIDOWS - SUN DECLARES WAR Sun Microsystems' has declared war on Black Widow Java applets on the Web. This is the message from Sun in response to an extensive Online Business Consultant (OBC/May 96) investigation into Java security. OBC's investigation and report was prompted after renowned academics, scientists and hackers announced Java applets downloaded from the WWW presented grave security risks for users. Java Black Widow applets are hostile, malicious traps set by cyberthugs out to snare surfing prey, using Java as their technology. OBC received a deluge of letters asking for facts after OBC announced a group of scientists from Princeton University, Drew Dean, Edward Felten and Dan Wallach, published a paper declaring "The Java system in its current form cannot easily be made secure." The paper can be retrieved at http://www.cs.princeton.edu/sip/pub/secure96.html. Further probing by OBC found that innocent surfers on the Web who download Java applets into Netscape's Navigator and Sun's HotJava browser, risk having "hostile" applets interfere with their computers (consuming RAM and CPU cycles). It was also discovered applets could connect to a third party on the Internet and, without the PC owner's knowledge, upload sensitive information from the user's computer. Even the most sophisticated firewalls can be penetrated . . . "because the attack is launched from behind the firewall," said the Princeton scientists. One reader said, "I had no idea that it was possible to stumble on Web sites that could launch an attack on a browser." Another said, "If this is allowed to get out of hand it will drive people away from the Web. Sun must allay fears." The response to the Home Page Press hostile applet survey led to the analogy of Black Widow; that the Web was a dangerous place where "black widows" lurked to snare innocent surfers. As a result the Princeton group and OBC recommended users should "switch off" Java support in their Netscape Navigator browsers. OBC felt that Sun and Netscape had still to come clean on the security issues. But according to Netscape's Product Manager, Platform, Steve Thomas, "Netscape wishes to make it clear that all known security problems with the Navigator Java and JavaScript environment are fixed in Navigator version 2.02." However, to date, Netscape has not answered OBC's direct questions regarding a patch for its earlier versions of Navigator that supported Java . . . the equivalent of a product recall in the 3D world. Netscape admits that flaws in its browsers from version 2.00 upwards were related to the Java security problems, but these browsers are still in use and can be bought from stores such as CompUSA and Cosco. A floor manager at CompUSA, who asked not to be named, said "its news to him that we are selling defective software. The Navigator walks off our floor at $34 a pop." OBC advised Netscape the defective software was still selling at software outlets around the world and asked Netscape what action was going to be taken in this regard. Netscape has come under fire recently for its policy of not releasing patches to software defects; but rather forcing users to download new versions. Users report this task to be a huge waste of time and resources because each download consists of several Mbytes. As such defective Navigators don't get patched. OBC also interviewed Sun's JavaSoft security guru, Ms. Marianne Mueller, who said "we are taking security very seriously and working on it very hard." Mueller said the tenet that Java had to be re-written from scratch or scrapped "is an oversimplification of the challenge of running executable content safely on the web. Security is hard and subtle, and trying to build a secure "sandbox" [paradigm] for running untrusted downloaded applets on the web is hard." Ms. Mueller says Sun, together with their JavaSoft (Sun's Java division) partners, have proposed a "sandbox model" for security in which "we define a set of policies that restrict what applets can and cannot do---these are the boundaries of the sandbox. We implement boundary checks---when an applet tries to cross the boundary, we check whether or not it's allowed to. If it's allowed to, then the applet is allowed on its way. If not, the system throws a security exception. "The 'deciding whether or not to allow the boundary to be crossed' is the research area that I believe the Princeton people are working on," said Mueller. "One way to allow applets additional flexibility is if the applet is signed (for example, has a digital signature so that the identity of the applet's distributor can be verified via a Certificate Authority) then allow the applet more flexibility. "There are two approaches: One approach is to let the signed applet do anything. A second approach is to do something more complex and more subtle, and only allow the applet particular specified capabilities. Expressing and granting capabilities can be done in a variety of ways. "Denial of service is traditionally considered one of the hardest security problems, from a practical point of view. As [Java's creator] James Gosling says, it's hard to tell the difference between an MPEG decompressor and a hostile applet that consumes too many resources! But recognizing the difficulty of the problem is not the same as 'passing the buck.' We are working on ways to better monitor and control the use (or abuse) of resources by Java classes. We could try to enforce some resource limits, for example. These are things we are investigating. "In addition, we could put mechanisms in place so that user interface people (like people who do Web browsers) could add 'applet monitors' so that browser users could at least see what is running in their browser, and kill off stray applets. This kind of user interface friendliness (letting a user kill of an applet) is only useful if the applet hasn't already grabbed all the resources, of course." The experts don't believe that the problem of black widows and hostile applets is going to go away in a hurry. In fact it may get worse. The hackers believe that when Microsoft releases Internet Explorer 3.00 with support for Java, Visual Basic scripting and the added power of its ActiveX technology, the security problem will become worse. "There is opportunity for abuse, and it will become an enormous problem," said Stephen Cobb, Director of Special Projects for the National Computer Security Association (NCSA). "For example, OLE technology from Microsoft [ActiveX] has even deeper access to a computer than Java does." JavaSoft's security guru Mueller agreed on the abuse issue: "It's going to be a process of education for people to understand the difference between a rude applet, and a serious security bug, and a theoretical security bug, and an inconsequential security-related bug. In the case of hostile applets, people will learn about nasty/rude applet pages, and those pages won't be visited. I understand that new users of the Web often feel they don't know where they're going when they point and click, but people do get a good feel for how it works, pretty quickly, and I actually think most users of the Web can deal with the knowledge that not every page on the web is necessarily one they'd want to visit. Security on the web in some sense isn't all that different from security in ordinary life. At some level, common sense does come into play. "Many people feel that Java is a good tool for building more secure applications. I like to say that Java raises the bar for security on the Internet. We're trying to do something that is not necessarily easy, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth trying to do. In fact it may be worth trying to do because it isn't easy. People are interested in seeing the software industry evolve towards more robust software---that's the feedback I get from folks on the Net." # # # The report above may be reprinted with credit provided as follows: Home Page Press, Inc., http://www.hpp.com and Online Business Consultant Please refer to the HPP Web site for additional information about Java and OBC. =========================================================== ............Home Page Press, Inc. http://www.hpp.com home of Go.Fetch ........Free TEXT version - Online Business Today email: obt.text(a)hpp.com ....Free PDF version - Online Business Today email: obt.pdf(a)hpp.com OBC / Online Business Consultant, $595/year email: obc(a)hpp.com

3 2

Leaflet for First Monday
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 12:32:45 +0200 (METDST) From: Erik Barfoed <journals(a)inet.uni-c.dk> Subject: Leaflet for First Monday To: tony durham <tdurham(a)cix.compulink.co.uk>, robert hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com>, ed krol <e-krol(a)uiuc.edu>, bonnie nardi <nardi(a)taurus.apple.com>, ian peter <ianp(a)peg.apc.org>, rich wiggins <rwwmaint(a)msu.edu>, vint cerf <vcerf(a)mci.net>, Ed Valauskas <g0094(a)applelink.apple.com>, Esther Dyson <edyson(a)eff.org>, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh <rishab(a)dxm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Dear Everybody Once again I forward you the plain text version of the First Monday leaflet, which I kindly urge you to distribute. Best regards Pernille Hammels| Editor Journals Division e-mail: journals(a)inet.uni-c.dk Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="fmleaf.txt" Content-ID: <Pine.3.89.9605151245.A25943(a)inet.uni-c.dk> Content-Description: Leaflet for First Monday CALL FOR PAPERS Editor-in-Chief Edward J. Valauskas, Internet Mechanics, Chicago, IL, USA (valauskas(a)firstmonday.dk) Consulting Editor Esther Dyson EDventure Holdings, New York, NY, USA (dyson(a)firstmonday.dk) International Editor Rishab Aiyer Ghosh, The Indian Techonomist, New Delhi, India (ghosh(a)firstmonday.dk) Editorial Board Vinton G. Cerf, Senior, Vice-Presiden at MCI Tony Durham, The Times Higher Education Supplement, UK Robert A. Hettinga, Shipwright Development Corp., USA Ed Krol, University of Illinois, USA Bonnie Nardi, Apple Computer, USA Ian Peter, Ian Peter and Associates Cathsworth Island, Australia Rich Wiggins, Michigan State University, USA First Monday is a peer-reviewed journal on the Internet - about the Internet. This scientific journal expands the frontiers of academic publishing by combining the tradi-tional values of peer-reviewing and strict quality control with a new way of publishing on the World Wide Web. Aim and Scope The aim of First Monday is to publish original articles about the Internet and the Global Information Infrastructure. First Monday will: - follow the political and regulatory regimes affecting the Internet - examine the use of the Internet on a global scale, by analyzing economic, technical, and social factors - analyze research and development of Internet software and hardware - study the use of the Internet in specific communities - report on standards - discuss the content of the Internet First Monday will appear in three formats 1. Monthly Mail from a Mail Server First Monday will appear first of all as an electronic mail posting from the First Monday listserver. This issue of First Monday will be sent to the subscribers on the first monday of every month as an ASCII text file. It will include all the articles of each issue and pointers to information resources located at various Web, Gopher, and other sites. 2. Web Site This is the place where subscribers - and newcomers - can read about the journal, learn how to subscribe, read previously published articles, and submit manu-scripts and other materials for publication. This Web Site will also provide access to objects and files that are part of the articles. These objects and files can be downloaded. All back issues of First Monday will also be available for downloading. 3. Annual CD-ROM First Monday will also appear as an annual CD-ROM, containing all articles published in a given year. This CD-ROM will be offered at a low price to subscribers at the end of the year. Will paper versions be available? First Monday is an experiment in electronic publishing, exploring the possibilities of communicating in this Internet medium. At the insistence of subscribers, we can offer printing, but only on-demand. Process The flow of a typical article, from author to publication: - An author is contacted by an Editor to write an _article, or - An author submits an article to a Editor by electronic mail. The article is forwarded by electronic mail to the Editorial Office in Chicago. - The Editorial Office starts the peer-review process by forwarding the article to reviewers by electronic mail. The Editorial Office is responsible for tracking the article, handling comments from editors and _reviewers to authors, editing, and creating a final accepted article. - This initial peer-reviewing process is private. - Articles that are accepted for publication are distributed to all subscribers in the monthly mail, and posted on the First Monday Web Site. The Web Site version of the article is likely to contain objects (illustrations, programs, and other digital items) that are not included in the monthly mailing of the plain ASCII text. - All articles published in First Monday will be included in an annual archival CD-ROM. This CD-ROM will be offered to subscribers at a low price. How to submit articles To submit an article to First Monday, simply send it _by electronic mail to the Editorial Office (Edward J. Valauskas), valauskas(a)firstmonday.dk. Preference will be given to articles which take advantage of the Internet, using graphics, programs, HTML features and components, and other features not pos-sible in print. The text of the article (exclusive of any other objects like pictures, tables et cetera) should not exceed 30.000 characters. Format The manuscript must be in its final form, as a plain ASCII text, suited for distribution in the monthly e-mail. If an Internet resource is cited, just type in the URL. _Manuscripts can be marked up in HTML, as long as the tags are recognizable by most popular Web browsers. Non-text objects, like pictures, programs, spreadsheets, audio files, and full motion video files, can be part of an article. These non-text objects must be forwarded as binary files to the Editorial Office. Non-text should conform to well established de facto standards on the net: PDF, GIF, JPEG et cetera. Priority will be given to particular items of a high scientific standard, and articles with a relevant timeframe can be published at short notice as a rapid publication. Only original papers written in English will be considered for publication. Copyright Authors submitting a paper to First Monday automatically agree to assign copyright to Munksgaard International Publishers if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. The articles published in First Monday are protected by copyright, which covers translation rights and the right to reproduce and distribute all of the articles in the journal. Authors submitting a paper to First Monday do so in the understanding that online publishing on the Internet is a new opportunity and challenge, but also a step into a new territory, where authors and publishers do not always have the means to protect against unauthorized copying or editing of copyright protected works. --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "If they could 'just pass a few more laws', we would all be criminals." --Vinnie Moscaritolo The e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/

1 0

DCSB: The FSTC Electronic Check Project
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Notice the corrected reservation deadline date (now June 1st, 1996) :-) Sorry about that... Cheers, Bob Hettinga -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The Digital Commerce Society of Boston Presents Frank Jaffe, of The Bank of Boston and The Financial Services Technology Consortium (FSTC) "The FSTC Electronic Check Project" Tuesday, June 4, 1996 12 - 2 PM The Downtown Harvard Club of Boston One Federal Street, Boston, MA Frank Jaffe is a Senior Systems Consultant in the Applied Technology Group at the Bank of Boston. Frank is currently the project manager for the FSTC Electronic Check project which involves over 30 companies. Frank has played a leadership role in planning the amalgamation of Bank of Boston's five major retail computer systems into a single, common software system; acting as project leader for a new teller system, and leading the screen phone R&D project in cooperation with Northern Telecom and Bellcore. The FSTC Electronic Check project will develop an enhanced all-electronic replacement to the paper check. Electronic checks will be used like paper checks, by businesses and consumers, and will use existing inter-bank clearing systems. Like its paper counterpart, the Electronic Check represents a self contained "information object," which has all of the information necessary to complete a payment. Likewise, paper checkbooks are replaced by portable Electronic Checkbooks; pens & signatures are replaced by signature card functions and digital signatures using advanced cryptographic techniques; stamps and envelopes by electronic mail or other communications options such as the World Wide Web over the Internet. The fully automated processing capabilities of Electronic Checks opens the possibility of other types of financial instruments, such as electronic cashiers, travelers, and certified checks. Electronic check writing and processing will be integrated into existing applications, from cash registers to personal checkbook managers to large corporate accounting systems, to greatly increase the convenience, and reduce the costs, of writing, accepting, and processing checks. This meeting of the Digital Commerce Society of Boston will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1996 from 12pm - 2pm at the Downtown Branch of the Harvard Club of Boston, One Federal Street. The price for lunch is $27.50. This price includes lunch, room rental, and the speaker's lunch. ;-). The Harvard Club *does* have dress code: jackets and ties for men, and "appropriate business attire" for women. We need to receive a company check, or money order, (or if we *really* know you, a personal check) payable to "The Harvard Club of Boston", by Saturday, June 1, or you won't be on the list for lunch. Checks payable to anyone else but The Harvard Club of Boston will have to be sent back. Checks should be sent to Robert Hettinga, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02131. Again, they *must* be made payable to "The Harvard Club of Boston". If anyone has questions, or has a problem with these arrangements (We've had to work with glacial A/P departments more than once, for instance), please let us know via e-mail, and we'll see if we can work something out. Planned speakers for the following few months are: July Pete Loshin Author, "Electronic Commerce" August Duane Hewitt Idea Futures We are actively searching for future speakers. If you are in Boston on the first Tuesday of the month, and you would like to make a presentation to the Society, please send e-mail to the DCSB Program Commmittee, care of Robert Hettinga, rah(a)shipwright.com . For more information about the Digital Commerce Society of Boston, send "info dcsb" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)ai.mit.edu . If you want to subscribe to the DCSB e-mail list, send "subscribe dcsb" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)ai.mit.edu . Looking forward to seeing you there! Cheers, Robert Hettinga Moderator, The Digital Commerce Society of Boston -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMZnOlvgyLN8bw6ZVAQEm8gP/deJ/J0ncmiUTJo82jeGMRp38q+8u+/LH zUZ3dgOCXFM9Nldni/EM0nKiRAgPJTqlcGkrE6Q44s2+ZSPtTiop2Tbx+3xoCW9t zTeKoLoTLgcS7LYS1b/VpcJqN9+q7gGxqmyAd88yZei+i4ZHw6kUGB6MyeHMPq+t CSrEOkkikXE= =SWUd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "If they could 'just pass a few more laws', we would all be criminals." --Vinnie Moscaritolo The e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/

1 0