December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: postmaster@lance.colostate.edu speaks
by Peter shipley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Since postmaster(a)lance.colostate.edu will not aid us in requesting L. Detweiler <ld231782(a)longs.lance.colostate.edu> to behave I guess we will have to start cc'ing (and forward out prevous emailings) to postmater(a)colostate.edu as well as: Julian Kateley <KATELEY(a)COLOSTATE.EDU> (303) 491-5778 and Stew McPherson <STEW(a)YUMA.ACNS.COLOSTATE.EDU> (303) 491-7214 being that they are the Administrative and Technical Contact for the Domain Name COLOSTATE.EDU

6 7

Re: postmaster@lance.colostate.edu speaks bounce
by css＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message:

1 0

Applied Cryptography, $35.71
by John Chang 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

README.DOC, a Pennsylvania-based computer book discounter, sells their books at a 25% discount. $2 for S&H, though if you buy 3 or more books at a time they waive shipping charges as well. They have Applied Cryptography in stock. 800-678-1473. I also asked about Intro to Komolgorov Complexity; they don't stock it. I forgot to ask about Koza's Genetic Programming. - John

1 0

Unsubscribe
by maloneyt＠cae.wisc.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I am mailing this because I would like to be took of the mailing list for cypherpunks. Thank you maloneyt(a)cae.wisc.edu

1 0

cc: FBI
by Carl Ellison 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>And anyone who didn't include a surveillance agency in the list of >message recipients would of course be demonstrating that they were up >to no good and should be investigated. How diabolically clever. > >Next let's "voluntarily" switch to postcards for all snail mail. :) You're catching on! :-) Actually -- the important thing to do is get the gov't to stop trying to get suppliers to voluntarily insert spying taps and let the individual citizens provide their own spying taps. Think of it as a form of voting. Meanwhile, changing the Clipper proposal to mine should help focus the public debate. I definitely think NIST should change to my proposal! - Carl

2 1

UNSUSCRIBE
by amoller＠neuronet.pitt.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

PLEAS UNSUSCRIBE ME

1 0

Detweiler, Schmetweiler....
by schulz＠omcron.uleth.ca 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I joined this list about two weeks ago, and there's a hell of a lot of traffic regarding this detweiler goof. Get detweiler, who's detweiler, let's not remail anymore cuz of detweiler, detweiler's bugging me so I'm unsubscribing. Blah Blah Blah Blah fucking blah. Check this out: 1. This guy is a goof. 2. By punching 'n' or 'd' you can filter him out. Ta-dah. Solution to detweiler. Let's get on with the revolution, brothers and sisters rather than engaging in geeky net.gossip . Detwhiner comes to my house to harass me I'll send him packing northside style, but until that comes to pass I think I can deal with it. Isn't it about time we begin to work in earnest towards our true goals, that of freeing ourselves from these government monstrosities through application of cryptography ? Why don't you guys start a new detweiler list ? Then everybody who wants to talk about detweiler, reply to detweiler, blah blah blah can carry on and then I only have to filter out detweiler's own rantings.. No ! Wait ! Better yet ! Sci.cryptography.detweiler.piss.off !! Ya, that'd be cool. < insert appropriately sarcastic smiley here.....>

2 1

RSA 'weak link' in PGP?
by fnerd＠smds.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I just got (what I think is) the alt.security.pgp faq. I quote: ...the IDEA encryption algorithm used in PGP is actually MUCH stronger than RSA given the same key length. Even with a 1024 bit RSA key, it is believed that IDEA encryption is still stronger, and, since a chain is no stronger than it's weakest link, it is believed that RSA is actually the weakest part of the RSA - IDEA approach. Confirmation? -fnerd quote me - - cryptocosmology- sufficiently advanced communication is indistinguishable from noise - god is in the least significant bits -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvt3niQCVAgUBLMs3K ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2tPEot1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz 3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hSnC1R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG sRjLQs4iVVM= =9wqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Where can I get RFC-822?
by Philippe Nave 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello, all! If I recall correctly, RFC-822 defines the standards for e-mail. Anybody know where I can get a copy? I have e-mail access and can ftp (at least for a while yet) from this system. Any help will be appreciated. - -- ........................................................................ Philippe D. Nave, Jr. | The person who does not use message encryption pdn(a)dwroll.dw.att.com | will soon be at the mercy of those who DO... Denver, Colorado USA | PGP public key: by arrangement. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLUAdJQvlW1K2YdE1AQEpnQQAxsWuZxuRCXFzQkcKyNUpeWXp8xtBO9oK Kj1/mFeaTo+luTfoex0dHdzBsnhpvDFyoPmlzvMDHU6VloSId2FLo5/FizJX3S7m o6stlZtZfUHBkbXrzKeKLouGU6IGsg6nBfqRUjdyITiUSFi7EMhKxaBlWlcSpAZg JxUj3aWOiR8= =9HXw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

UNSUBSCRIBE
by p0070＠albeniz.eui.upm.es 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

UNSUBSCRIBE me from your mail-l, I can't read all this mail !!

1 0