- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

RSA and Cylink settle
by Bruce Schneier 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Subj: Cylink and RSA Data Security Reach Legal Settlement; Public Key Encryption Compa Date: Tue, Jan 7, 1997 7:52 AM EST From: AOLNewsProfiles(a)aol.net REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 7, 1997--RSA Data Security, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:SDTI), and Cylink Corporation (NASDAQ:CYLK), today announced a comprehensive global settlement of their long-standing legal disputes. The settlement ends all outstanding litigation between Cylink and RSA. The two companies reached an amicable resolution of their disputes. As part of the settlement, Cylink granted to RSA all necessary rights to Cylink's Stanford patents, and RSA granted to Cylink a license to RSA's cryptographic software toolkits. For both parties, the settlement ends further prolongation of a legal dispute that has been costly and distracting. RSA is fulfilling the promise made to its customers to resolve the disputes with Cylink. Cylink, under its new president and chief executive, is refocusing all of its energies on providing end-to-end data security products and solutions, and has the ability to incorporate RSA or other technologies to meet customer requirements. "We are very pleased that what had so long seemed to be an intractable problem has, within the space of 10 days, now been resolved by the new management at Cylink," said James Bidzos, president of RSA. "I worked well with Fernand Sarrat while he was at IBM, and that working relationship helped us reach this agreement so swiftly. This agreement turns long-time antagonists into companies that are already exploring ways of working together constructively, to the benefit of the industry as a whole." Fernand Sarrat, president and chief executive officer of Cylink, said, "We are setting out on an aggressive new course at Cylink in which old disputes are an unnecessary distraction. RSA will be one of our strategic suppliers and we anticipate focusing totally on the needs of our customers and the enormous market opportunity before us." RSA Data Security, Inc. RSA Data Security, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDTI), is the world's brand name for cryptography, with more than 75 million copies of RSA encryption and authentication technologies installed and in use worldwide. RSA technologies are part of existing and proposed standards for the Internet and World Wide Web, IT4, ISO, ANSI, IEEE, business, financial and electronic commerce networks around the globe. The company develops and markets platform-independent developer's kits and end-user products and provides comprehensive cryptographic consulting services. Founded in 1982 by the inventors of the RSA Public Key Cryptosystem, the company is headquartered in Redwood City, Calif. Cylink Corporation Cylink Corporation (NASDAQ: CYLK) is a leading worldwide supplier of information security solutions, providing the most comprehensive portfolio of public key cryptographic hardware and software products available today. Cylink's products enable secure transmissions over local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), public packet switched networks such as the Internet, asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) and frame relay networks. Cylink, headquartered in Sunnyvale, Calif., is also the leader in outdoor spread spectrum microwave radio communications. Cylink's customers include national and multinational corporations, financial institutions and government organizations. For more information about Cylink and its products, call the fax-on-demand number 800/735-6614, or visit the company's Web site at http://www.cylink.com. --30--mg/sf* eh CONTACT: Cylink Paula Contos Dunne, 408/523-5993 pdunne(a)cylink.com or Edelman Worldwide Ina McGuinness, 415/433-5381 x 213 imcguinn(a)edelman.com or Patrick Corman Patrick Corman, 415/326-9648 Corman(a)cerfnet.com ************************************************************************ * Bruce Schneier 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,002,000, * Counterpane Systems 000,000,000,000,000,000,002,000,000,002,293 * schneier(a)counterpane.com The last prime number...alphabetically! * (612) 823-1098 Two vigintillion, two undecillion, two * 101 E Minnehaha Pkwy trillion, two thousand, two hundred and * Minneapolis, MN 55419 ninety three. * http://www.counterpane.com ************************************************************************

2 1

Dale on a tear (again)
by mixmaster＠remail.obscura.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:04 PM 1/5/97 -0800, Dale obviously wrote: :I'll bet Hitler was disenchanted by the declaration against him by the World Jewish Congress. : :I'll bet Andrew Jackson was disenchanted with the decisions of the :Seminole Indian leaders to not just lay down and die. : :And now Sandy is disenchanted. What a hypocritical asshole. What can one make of this fellow Dale? Either he is Dr. V's mouthpiece or he has gone off the deep end. A pity in either case -- a mind is a terrible thing to waste.

1 0

Re: FW: Modified Token Posting Scheme
by ed.falk＠Eng.Sun.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> >> How about this simple policy scheme: > >> > >> 1) posts from known list members forwarded to list automatically > >> 2) posts with "approval cookie" also forwarded automatically > >> 3) otherwise, forwarded only after approval by moderator, > > > So does this mean that any personal attacks or useless and annoying > drivel from the likes of Timmy May, Ray Arachelian and Sandy Sandford > would be automatically forwarded to the mailing list even though they > are frequently more annoying than the spam posted by the people who > would be censored by Gilmore ? No, just the opposite. My scheme allows people to route around moderation by authenticating their posts. The goal here is to keep *random* stuff, such as spam, off the list.

1 0

NEW
by express＠capella.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

THE FOX FIRES HAVE STARTED BURNING! http://www.mlmers-ad-net.com/FoxTeam/Fox FREE WEB PAGE AND CHECKS SENT OUT DAILY! Let it begin, John

1 0

American Cyber Mall
by rgwjr 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

AMERICAN CYBER MALL http://www.usacm.com FREE WEB PAGE CONTEST, WEEKLY DRAWING !!! Visit the American Cyber Mall http://www.usacm.com and you can register to win a FREE web page with FREE 12 months hosting !!! Just our way of say thanks for visiting our new award winning cyber mall. American Cyber Mall http://www.usacm.com TO BE REMOVED FROM LIST REPLY WITH SUBJECT = REMOVE

1 0

[CRYPTO] Quadratic residues
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timothy May's family tree goes straight up. All of his ancestors were siblings, to dumb to recognize each other in the dark. /\ o-/\ Timothy May ///\|/\\\ / /|\ \

1 0

Great Opportunity!
by AllTheCash＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I thought this may be of interst to you! I recently researched a company who has all the traits of becoming a key player in the Health & Nutrition industry. The companies name is I.D.E.A. Concepts and They are Steamrolling the competition! ...FREE Multi-Page Custom Website Does All The Work For You! ...No Sign Up Fees! ...Incredible Pay Structure..You recieve your checks every 2 weeks! ...Top Notch support from Doctors and Biotech News letters! It's hard to really sum up all the benefits of this outfit in one short letter so please take a look for yourself at what they have to offer... .....What Do You Have To Lose! http://www.multi-level.com/millennium/quickmoney.html Best Of Luck, D.M.C.

1 0

Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
by ed.falk＠Eng.Sun.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > > How about this simple policy scheme: > > > > > > 1) posts from known list members forwarded to list automatically > > > 2) posts with "approval cookie" also forwarded automatically > > > 3) otherwise, forwarded only after approval by moderator, > > > > I.e., libel from Timmy May, Ray Arachelian, and the rest of the gang > > is approved automatically, and when a victim tries to defend himself > > and to point out that Timmy May is a liar, the response is delayed > > and probably rejected by the moderator. > > > > It's been said that the best response to speech one doesn't like > > is more speech. "Cypher punks" want to take away the victim's > > ability to respond to the lies being posted on their mailing list. > > You are far from being the victim of anything. If anything you're a big > huge thug who spams the list, posts racist flames, posts homophobic > flames, uses social engineering to find out info on his "enemies" and > then posts that info online with requests that others send flames to that > person's employers. Besides, in my scheme, the first two options are explicitly there to avoid moderation. Just post under your real name or generate an authentication cookie.

1 0

No Subject
by anonymous＠miron.vip.best.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

NOVEMBER 11, 1996 INFORMATION WARFARE U.S. sitting duck, DOD panel predicts BY BOB BREWIN AND HEATHER HARRELD (antenna(a)fcw.com and heather_harreld(a)fcw.com) The dependence of the United States on computers and communications systems to run its critical power, finance and transportation systems places the country at risk in the event of an information warfare (IW) attack, according to a report prepared by a top-level Defense Department advisory panel. This reliance, it said, has "created a tunnel of vulnerability previously unrealized in the history of conflict" and could have a "catastrophic effect on the ability of [DOD] to fulfill its mission." The report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Information Warfare-Defense (IW-D), obtained by Federal Computer Week, called the threat of an IW attack "significant," adding that the nation's "vulnerabilities are numerous, [and] the countermeasures are extremely limited...." Citing a specific example, the DSB report said one building in Savannah, Ga., (a Bell South switching facility, FCW learned) houses not only a vital communications hub but information technology systems supporting key electric power and transportation companies. Because Savannah serves as a vital port of embarkation for Army troops based in that area, an IW attack against that one building would "make it impossible to deploy military forces at the pace specified in operations plans." The DSB task force, chaired by two former assistant secretaries of Defense for command, control, communications and intelligence (ASD/C3I), Duane Andrews and Donald Latham, viewed the IW problem as so severe that it urged the Pentagon to embark immediately on a crash course to protect against this new form of warfare, providing detailed policy, funding and legal recommendations. These recommendations included a controversial call for the Pentagon to have the legal power to protect nongovernmental portions of the infrastructure in the name of "the common defense." To defend DOD and critical nongovernmental systems against IW, the report recommends new legal authority that will allow "DOD, law enforcement and intelligence agencies to conduct efficient, coordinated monitoring of attacks on the critical civilian information infrastructure...." In carving out a position for DOD to take on this role in the civil sector, the report bluntly summed up the problem: "We should not forget information warfare is a form of warfare, not a crime or an act of terror." It took an equally blunt approach on how the Pentagon should respond to such an attack or intrusion. "The response could entail civil or criminal prosecution, use of military force...diplomatic initiatives or economic mandates." DSB, which said it has urged immediate and concerted action on the IW-D front for the past three years, had a number of recommendations on how DOD should get its own information warfare act together. The report said it would take $3 billion over the next five years to translate these recommendations into reality. This includes establishing the ASD/C3I as the single focal point for IW-D within the department - a necessary step to spread the diffusion of IW responsibilities among the services and Defense agencies, according to a source familiar with the thinking of the task force. Emmett Paige Jr., ASD/C3I, said he had read a copy of the DSB briefing to deputy secretary of Defense John White. Paige said, "I saw nothing in that briefing I do not agree with. I strongly support everything in their briefing." DISA's Role The Defense Information Systems Agency would take on a pivotal IW-D role, based on the recommendations in the report. It called for DISA to set up an IW operations center to provide tactical warning, attack, assessment and emergency response with infrastructure restoration capabilities, and it pegged funding for this center at $275 million over five years. DISA also should establish a joint office for system, network and infrastructure design, the report said, with funding estimated at $225 million over five years. DISA director Lt. Gen. Al Edmonds has already acted on these recommendations, setting up last week a Global Operations and Security Center and a Programs office (see Intercepts). Edmonds said DISA decided not to wait to have these recommendations approved. "We're doing this on our own. We want a new focus here...and we're funding it out of our own budget [by] prioritizing on Information Warfare-Defense. The DSB is right on target, and they got us rolling." The Pentagon also needs to refocus its IW research and development, the report said, recommending $580 million over five years. This poses a tough challenge, DSB said, because "prior R&D efforts have been in areas such as computer and network security.... Little attention has been paid to surviving willful malicious attack, or detecting and eliminating corrupt software." The DSB task force also took some potshots at some well-established and well-entrenched DOD IW policies and programs. Looking at the national debate over the key escrow encryption systems backed by the Clinton administration, the DSB report dismissed encryption as a "distraction.... Encryption simply does not solve all of the information security problems some are led to believe." The National Security Agency's long-running Multilevel-Secure Information Systems Security Initiative also received short shrift from the task force, which suggested commercial products such as security "tokens" rather than passwords could go a long way in the near term toward resolving DOD's security problems. The task force also brought sober realism to the theme of "information superiority" promulgated by all the services during the past several years to such an extent that it has become almost a mantra. "The doctrine of information superiority assumes the availability of information and information technology - a dangerous assumption.... Published service and joint doctrine does not address the operational implications of a failure of information and technology," the report said. The intelligence community's ability to handle IW also came in for a similar assessment by the task force, which called IW "a nontraditional intelligence problem [that is]...not easily discernible by traditional intelligence." Traditional intelligence skills "are largely irrelevant in the information warfare environment." Percy Pierre, an electrical engineering professor at Michigan State University and a member of the DSB task force, said DOD's interest in protecting critical infrastructure is a result of "the recognition that the Defense Department is dependent on private-sector assets for logistical support and other types of support." Any move by government toward civil electronic defense must be delicately balanced to avoid antagonizing the private sector, said Winn Schwartau, a security consultant and author of several information warfare books. "For them to blatantly say, `We want to monitor,' that creates a huge problem," he said. "If the government says, `You don't worry, private sector, we're going to take care of you,' they're going to have a problem." You must register to read this week's news or to use the search or forums. If you haven't signed up yet, fill out the registration form. Mail questions about this Web page to webmaster(a)fcw.com. URL: http://www.fcw.com

3 3

Sandy is God...Listen to Him!
by nobody＠replay.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Don't understand all this issue about Sandy and John filtering the list. Don't we want order and control? We need Sandy to decide whether our articles should be read by others. Sandy is our spokesman, our leader, our navigator. When he founded the Cypherpunks group, he wanted ``order and control, ``and now he has been forced to re-assume control of the group to put controls in place. Hey, if Sandy and John say we have to stick to certain topics, well, dammit, they are in control and we have to do what they want. Sandy and John are our leaders. Forget this stuff about the Cypherpunks list being a group seperate from toad.com. Forget this idea that John is just the host of the list...he is actually the co-controlled. And we'd better pay attention. Why didn't Sandy and John just announce a new filtered list, like Blossom has? Why make their control the default for the whole list, with the the unfiltered list harder to subscribe to and eventually to go away completely? Good questions! Ask not the reasons for God's decissions. This is Sandy's list, and John's machine, and if they say they know best what is a flame and what is not, I say we should just take our medicine and learn to love their wise decisions. If they say we can only write flames if they approve, OK. If they say we must only write about libertarian topics, OK. If they reject our messages without explanation, OK. Sandy is our Leader. And anyone who doesn't respect our Leader should just leave. Bye -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 07dTgUBMs4Q8hvikii9febJAQEbrAQAmgwAeqSsi2qIkqakNRPCpwCwNnYudNop zyxE2LueC+WuhugtLeyDDet+WgefE9X84F4qxn/QVB+tJAGbZzfCPO24shelX21k mk80oevKqzcfAAzbB4tMtXe5gl6+zykExXjsx4J/KjMNPL0QAE490uvnKqus/a2H 0l2AU9k/Kp8= =ix2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0