- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Creative Justice?... [CNN] (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: >From ravage(a)ssz.com Fri Jan 2 20:33:21 1998 From: Jim Choate <ravage(a)ssz.com> Message-Id: <199801030233.UAA16279(a)einstein.ssz.com> Subject: Creative Justice?... [CNN] To: users(a)ssz.com (SSZ User Mail List) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 20:33:15 -0600 (CST) Cc: friends(a)ssz.com (Ravage's Friends) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2327 Forwarded message: > DRUNKEN DRIVER ORDERED CLOSER TO LIQUOR STORE > > graphic January 2, 1998 > Web posted at: 8:39 p.m. EST (0139 GMT) > > CINCINNATI (Reuters) -- An Ohio judge has ordered a chronic drunken > driver to move within easy walking distance of a liquor store or > face jail. > > In a sentence meted out on New Year's Eve, Hillsboro Municipal Judge > James Hapner ordered Dennis Cayse to move within "easy walking > distance" -- defined as one-half mile or less -- of a liquor store > within 30 days or face a potential 1-1/2-year jail sentence for > drunken driving. > > It was Cayse's 18th conviction for drunken driving. He was also > sentenced to spend the first week of each of the next five years in > jail. > > The judge also directed that Cayse, who lost his license years ago > but continued to drink and drive, be handcuffed to the > passenger-side door or be seated with someone between him and the > driver anytime he travels. > > University of Cincinnati law professor Christo Lassiter said the > multiple sentence passed constitutional muster. > > "It appears to me that this sentence is neither unconstitutional nor > inappropriate," Lassiter told Reuters Friday. "It looks to me like > the judge felt that there was nothing he could do to keep the man > off the road except to make him move to where he could walk to buy > his booze." > > Hillsboro is a town of 6,000 just east of Cincinnati. > > "For as long as I have been associated with law enforcement, I have > never heard of such an unusual sentence. It's very squirrelly," said > Lt. Ronald Ward of the Highland County sheriff's office. > > "I have known Dennis Cayse a long time and I've never seen him sober > except when he was in jail," Ward said. "His lifetime record shows > that if he is not in jail, he's going to drink and drive." > > A spokeswoman for Mothers Against Drunk Driving denounced the > sentence, saying it was too lenient and sends the wrong public > message. > > Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

1 0

Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability)
by Charlie Comsec 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- usura(a)sabotage.org (Alex de Joode) wrote: > : I suspect that if you polled remailer operators you'd find that some > : keep logs and some don't. I don't know about the Replay remailer. Perhaps > : Alex DeJoode (the operator of the Replay remailer) would care to comment. Nor > : can logs necessarily positively identify you. If kept, they would record when > : your message came in and when the post to usenet went out, but *PROBABLY* > : would not establish a conclusive link between the two. Many remailers > : maintain a "reordering pool" where forwarded messages do not necessarily get > : sent out in the order they were received. > > I donnot keep sendmaillogs, I donnot keep remailerlogs and I let > usenet do my mail2newslogging ... (They can ofcourse always supena > /dev/null, and then they get everything ..) Good. No reason to tempt the Big Brother types (and wannabes). BTW, people outside the remailer operator and user community seem to assume that logs ARE kept. I'm curious to know how often individuals, organizations, and maybe even governments make requests for your logs. Oh ... also, if you don't mind, can you uuencode your /dev/null and send it to me? <g> > The "reordering pool" is > always a minimum of 5 messages so people can opt for how long their > message wil be 'stashed' at replay. (use 'Latency: +00:00' for zero latecy). Is that default reordering pool size the same for Type I and Type II messages? Perhaps someone can double-check my math on this. Assuming equally-sized messages that are otherwise indistinguishable, and a reordering pool size of five, then the odds of matching up an encrypted incoming message with an encrypted outgoing message are one in five. Thus a message chained through n remailers (each having a reordering pool size of 5) would be diffused among 5^n possible messages to thwart potential traffic analysis. What I'm unclear on is how setting a Latency: flag affects the diffusion of the output. Is that lattency IN ADDITION to the pool size of five, or does Latency: +00:00 bypass the reordering process altogether? My main concern is the security of chained reply blocks which are more vulnerable to attack than normal anonymous messages. A single anonymous message can only be traced BACKWARDS after it's been received. An anonymous reply, OTOH, could, theoretically, be "walked" through each remailer in the chain until the identity of the recipient was discovered. While that process would require convincing each remailer operator in the chain to cooperate, it's a lot more feasible than tracing a message backwards to its source. (Yes, I know about posting to a public message pool, such as a.a.m, but NG posting seems to be rather unreliable lately.) - ---- Finger <comsec(a)nym.alias.net> for PGP public key (Key ID=19BE8B0D) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNK2wqwbp0h8ZvosNAQFcpwf9GzP5jGSURrVZXu3omQXx9+de1aOHZ+Uk azgpHRZwStL86ztv1U5RcO7TRQ7gNgEd0+8V+z/wJei82f5zsQPCWVITjHBnUBKL sbGEFTtlkLfehXgF6oRk4xYzngxekYYFXm3UqZFKf/maQvMCRXbXSfTpb0CejpfQ 01PQGmXrShjdiYO8Uj+UoXzEEyAU383ssnJmsDBbnMvilM3aE5f0GXG/dx3QSvQi CfRzPFpcgfM4kojv8CxH5xfCvCWzKNgi8lnGuMjNwYApuGrYVtJSReq+OcAe9GeQ O2e+R9emHWiZHO16asfjnx6Eie7BylGrBRCLPWAAxPo16AtGjhJimw== =HRSR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Humor] Kennedy's New Legislation
by Eric Cordian 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Something amusing from alt.true-crime with definite crypto parallels to certain Swinestein and Freeh initiatives. It is rare to find material that rises to the Toto level of comedy on Usenet. ----- Newsgroups: alt.true-crime Subject: Kennedy Death Spurs Legislative Initiative Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 22:44:03 GMT Message-ID: <68jrg6$eil(a)dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> BOSTON, Mass. (AP) - Sen. Ted Kennedy announced here today that he will introduce a bill limiting access to skis and ski poles. The "Winter Sports Safety Bill" is believed to be a reaction to the recent death of the Senator's nephew Michael Kennedy in a skiing accident. "When skis were invented, they were made out of wood," Kennedy said. "Today's skis are simply to powerful and dangerous to be in the hands of people. There is no constitutional right to skiing. We feel that people will have to sacrifice some of their freedoms for the protection of society as a whole." One provision will license all dealers in skis. These licenses will involve fingerprinting, background checks, body cavity searches, and photographs of anybody wishing to be in the business of selling skis and ski poles. Another section of the bill bans any ski pole under 36" in length and any ski which is not at least 48" in length. The bill also addresses ski wax. Studies have shown that some waxes actually make the skis go faster, creating a greater danger of death to the skier. Skiers also use the faster skis to outrun the ski patrol, which is not an acceptable practice. A five day waiting period will be required for all ski and ski pole sales. People will be required to provide their social security number and floor plan of their homes before being permitted to purchase skis. "There are simply too many people getting excited about skiing. Easy access to skis is the major reason people get killed on those things. They should have to wait before they can pick up their skis. I am sure that this 'cooling off period' will save lives," Kennedy said. Another bill has been introduced that will ban 'ski carrying devices' on tops of cars that have a capacity of greater than ten skis. "There is simply no reason why anybody needs more than ten skis. You can't ski on more than two at the same time. People with more than ten skis are simply up to no good," said Kennedy. Statistics quoted by the Center for Disease Control show that skiing was second only to drowning as the leading cause of death for people close to the Kennedy family. OTHER RELATED STORIES: - Ted Kennedy Denies Driving Michael to Aspen. - Study Links Skiing to Suicides. - Clinton Calls for Restrictions on "Cop Killer" Ski Poles. - Washington DC to Buy Back Skis for $2 Each. - Dianne Feinstein Vows Defeat for the National Skiing Association. -- Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

8 16

Re: FCPUNX:Anonymous IRC (was 'Cypherpunks IRC Christmas EveParty')
by Lance Cottrell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 1:32 AM +0000 12/31/97, wayne clerke wrote: >On Tuesday, December 30, 1997 7:56 AM, Mark Hedges >[SMTP:hedges@rigel.cyberpass.net] wrote: >> >> >> We found IRC users to be so involved in petty information wars -- >> ping floods, malicious prank hacking, and the like -- that we directed >> policy against use of IRC from the anonymous shell accounts at CyberPass. >> >> If IRC users weren't so easily lulled by the tempation to crash a server >> or run malicious bots or just plain irritate other people for fun, and >> if they would gang up and kick out people who did that, then perhaps we'd >> switch that back on. >> >> They were just too much overhead. Everyone else seems pretty nice, really, >> as far as the system goes. They're all self-interested in keeping the >> anonymous publishing and so on going, so the peace keeps itself. > > >What's the reason behind the policy direction against the use of personal web >proxies running in a (paid for) shell account? >Seems like less risk than you already accept anyway. Something I've missed? > System load is the issue in this case. If a proxy becomes publicly known the load it imposes on the system could quickly become gigantic. In addition we found that people were setting up proxies on any old port, sometimes causing all kinds of conflicts. Our accounts are priced assuming light personal usage. Running servers on our systems is negotiable. -Lance ---------------------------------------------------------- Lance Cottrell loki(a)infonex.com PGP 2.6 key available by finger or server. http://www.infonex.com/~loki/ "Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come." --Nietzsche ----------------------------------------------------------

2 1

Eureka! Sun Jan 4 '98
by eureka＠eureka.abc-web.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to Sunday's issue of Eureka! PUSSY PARADISE Yet again Eureka! has managed to negotiate a special week's free access to one of the web' s premier porn sites. Pussy Paradise is simply packed with 100s of videos (many live), thousands of photos, and so much more. You will need your credit card as adult verification but it will not be charged for your free week! So check it out - there's smut a plenty! Pussy Paradise .... http://www.pussyparadise.com/eureka.html GAYEUREKA! NEW!! The new gay newsletter is now available. All the gay material from this newsletter and a whole load more will now appear in the new newsletter. If you would like to subscribe Please click here ..... http://eureka.abc-web.com/gayeureka/ EUREKA! is now available in three additional languages. So now you can choose from any of the following. And don't for- get, from January 10th we'll add Portuguese and Italian too! FRANÇAIS ..... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/francais.htm DEUTSCH ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/deutsch.htm ESPAÑOL ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/espanol.htm ANDREA'S FEMMES "Welcome, my name is Andrea. It makes me so hot knowing that you're looking my girls. I just can't keep my hands off my- self thinking about you looking at them. Enjoy these pic- tures..." You have to see these pix! Lots, good and free! Andrea's Femmes ...... http://www.latent-images.com/andreas/ ANGIE'S BIG BEAUTIFUL WOMEN Big ladies, I'm talking really huge! That's right, packing some serious chub. The site warrants a peek. Ya gotta see the "rock road" picture of the nipple tug. Ouch! Surf it. Angie's Big .................. http://www.waid.com.au/angie/ ABSOLUTE PORN Well I guess so! Lots of easy to get at fast loading free pix! Hot horny looking babes abound. The pix are all over and there's also a link to thumbnails. Worth the Surf! Yeah! Absolute Porn .... http://www.algonet.se/~ctwr/absoluteporn/ STUDMONKEY'S OBSESSIONS Choose your obsession, anal or lesbian. Once at that destin- ation you have more choices and some great pix of steamy 69 action! The pix are big and pretty good quality. Ohh Yeah! Studmonkey's Obsessions ......... http://www.studmonkey.com/ FREE STREAMING VIDEO Please note that most of these feeds require a Netscape bro- wser in order to successfully view them. Unfortunately Micr- osoft's browser does not have all the features of Netscape's yet. However, many of the feeds use the RealPlayer and will work in most browsers. If you do not have Netscape and want a free copy click here ... http://www.netscape.com/download/ Pregnant ....................... http://207.168.184.26/preg/ CHAT WITH OTHER READERS This chat is growing fast, and already there are a number of regulars you will meet most days. It's good to see Eureka! readers interacting with each other and having a great time! Adult/Sex Chat .................. http://137.39.63.229/chat/ General/Fun Chat ........ http://137.39.63.229/chat/funchat/ THE BEST PHONE SEX LIVE: 1-on-1, 2-on-1, Group, Dateline.........1-800-644-8779 FREE: Live 1-on-1 (international call only)....011-678-77416 AMATEUR SITE OF THE DAY ALEXIS: This Georgia peach is a tiny topper. With a tiny 34A chest she is perfect for all you guys who like them tiny! Nothing turns her on more than a strong, confident man who is not afraid to show his sensitive side. Her hobbies incl- ude "anything with water", she loves to water ski. See her in and out of her bikini! .. http://amateurindex.com/eureka/ TODAY'S FREE PIX OK, it's the new year, and now we are really going to start getting in gear, with some of the hottest FREE photos ever! Pic 1 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?040 Pic 2 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?041 Pic 3 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?042 Pic 4 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?043 Pic 5 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?044 Pic 6 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?045 Pic 7 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?046 Pic 8 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?047 Pic 9 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?048 Pic 10 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?049 PLEASE VISIT THIS FINE EUREKA! MEMBER SITE THE ULTIMATE HARDCORE SITES http://sexplosion.com/adverts.shtml An incredible collection of over 30 sites featuring the hottest free hardcore photos. The pix are easy to find and the sites are all very accessible. You won't be disappointed. ------------------------------------------------------------ If you would like to unsubscribe from the Eureka! Newsletter simply select reply and send us a quick reply to this email. ------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Meganet's Unbreakable Virtual Matrix Encryption Takes the Market by St
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Yes, the VME 98 is the same product that challenged Microsoft, > IBM, AT&T, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, America Online, > Netscape, etc. to break a VME encrypted file. All the great > computer minds in this country have had an opportunity to > dispel the bold claims of unbreakable encryption, yet none have. Why should Microsoft, IBM, AT&T, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, America Online, Netscape, "all the great computer minds in this country," etc. give a flying fuck?

1 0

Microsoft
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Windows is still fucking me up the ass! I'm bleeding to death here!

3 2

Re: Guns: H&K, G3, 7.62 v 5.56 [Guns] (fwd)
by Ryan Lackey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I've only seen bolt action .50s fired. They're not *too* heavy, and from the amount of muzzle flash, noise, etc. it gave, I'd be as comfortable using it at 1000-1500 yards as I would a .308 at 600-1000 yards. Given proper concealment and the absence of anyone looking directly at you when you fire, that is. Professional sniping is a 2 man operation anyway -- against a target that can shoot back, you really want to have a spotter. >From what I can gather, the US military seems to agree with this strategy -- .308s for traditional sniping, .50 for anti-materiel, extreme long range, and countersniping. Attacking an incoming force which has its own snipers is mostly a job for the .50. And if I were in the field on the offense, I'd be attacking small enough groups that a few .50 rounds would be sufficient to kill them all or at least immobilize them. Or high enough value targets to make a more likely kill worth the higher risk during E&E. True, they mainly use bolt-action .50s -- if the semi auto version is really that much heavier, I'd probably go for the bolt action gun in the field and the semi at my home. For Tim May's situation, in a house, they know fairly well that he's firing from the house. Pretty much any weapon will give enough signature for them to zero in on it and fire. If he's lucky, and they just have carbines and 7.62 snipers, he could fire from one room, move to another, fire, etc. Or have enough cover to keep himself from getting hit. But at some point, they'll just bring in a real countersniper asset, like an automatic cannon, and any muzzle flash will be responded to with several hundred AP/explosive shells. Within the house, the weight of a .50 isn't that bad -- and the extra 500-1000 yards and AP capability might make a difference against a raid. At the very least, it'll get his place firebombed rather than shot up :) Forcing them to keep outside the 1500-2000 yard high danger range from a .50 (or forcing them to stay behind serious cover) would give him a chance to duck out and fight another day, too :) A .50 is also a bit more effective against helicopters containing special forces "monitoring" personnel who are there (but of course not actually there) in violation of the law. It would be interesting to fit one's house with speakers/noise generators/ flash generators/smoke/etc. to make it look as if one has an automatic cannon or a small army, in response to a raid. It would make a perfect distraction during which to leave :) I'd much rather write code, make money, and leave the country (not necessarily in that order) than worry about defending myself from a government which has shown time and time again it is willing to ignore the law, though. [ObCrypto: * Eternity DDS is coming along. The current almost-ready-for-announcement version is using Postgres95 for a backend, sigh. Design for the first production-demo system is progressing as well. * The Cypherpunks Archive project I was working on is also progressing. Unfortunately, my archive is kind of weird -- it's in MIT discuss format, and converting it into mbox is nontrivial, given the size of the file. After adding more memory to the system on which I'm editing the file, I think I have an mbox file which is just missing one field. I'm planning to index them with hypermail, then glimpse. On the cd, I'll put the original mbox file, either as a single massive file or broken up, depending on what people want, as well as a precomputed index and perhaps the web site version as well. The next step is to put all of the cypherpunks archives into Eternity DDS -- Postgres95 seems to puke on large data objects sometimes, so I'll need to fix that. Once I get the cypherpunks archive done, I'll work on some other lists. And then hopefully some people will buy CD-Rs so I can buy another 25gb of HDD or so :) * Financial people are pretty cool. I just got back from talking to some about the Eternity Service concept, and they were really excited. I really didn't expect non-(electronic finance) finance people to be interested in it right away. They even got more excited when the magic word "cryptography" was mentioned. Perhaps finance will fix the software industry. -- Ryan Lackey rdl(a)mit.edu http://mit.edu/rdl/

4 3

Re: Guns: H&K, G3, 7.62 v 5.56 [Guns] (fwd)
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 1/3/98 4:05 PM, Ryan Lackey (rdl(a)mit.edu) passed this wisdom: >I've only seen bolt action .50s fired. They're not *too* heavy, and >from the amount of muzzle flash, noise, etc. it gave, I'd be as >comfortableusing it at 1000-1500 yards as I would a .308 at >600-1000 yards. Given proper concealment and the absence of anyone >looking directly at you when you fire, that is. Professional >sniping is a 2 man operation anyway --against a target that can >shoot back, you really want to have a spotter. I finally remebered where I saw it. In Tom Clancy's non-fiction book "MARINE: A Guided Tour of a Marine Expeditionary Unit." On pages 75-77 (there is a good picture too) he details the history and developement as well as the uses of the "Barrett M82A1A .50-cal special-purpose sniper rifle." It is for all intents and purposes a Brownig M2 .50-cal machine gun barrel/receiver set o a newly designed spring recoil system to be fired from shoulder wit bipod. It is chambered for the NATO standard .50-cal/12.7mm ammunition. It was developed by Ronnie Barrett of Murfeesboro, Tennessee and further developement sponsored by the USG and was first deployed by the CIA with the Mujahadeen in Afgahnistan where they used it to make some Russian troops quite miserable from a long way off. The sucess of it in Afghanistan force the military to consider it. Nothing is said concerning other services but it has been adopted by the USMC Force Recon for use by a three man team. The gun is broken down into upper reciever, lower reciver, and scope and ammo. There may be .50-cal bolt actions out there that are one man carries, but the Barrett gun is a three man load. The gun is 57 inches long and weighs 32.5 pounds, unloaded with no scope. The primary mission of the gun is not man sniping, though I am sure it often has been and will be used in that role, but its main aim is to long range snipe and disable antennae, dishes, equipment, etc using the AP and API ammunition. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNK6ybj7r4fUXwraZAQGSNgf/X6+K6j5lzj1odfzDM0HUfTnNzcc/RgSD OHHelk3Elb0jLDIX76KJsVOghDQ228QA+dFa+dEH+3YyjquIclKp4UBrfqw42Rfd Fv/HVinE9qLKse4PVY3Mjeqt8jHCGO01RHNATnrArDA6C2lVJIeE1tIDVGDVVtI2 bndGRnOexSXrFSm+5ux1GejWUYzUbLiQIOmfNSJMpzi8WwfQ/I3OLyFm5I6y9DR1 IiQZRs4RoqJ6f4caiZWz62/L6iivwKsOX6LCHlZAjz/6Ld+/o6ZtC0cjn/yWtUqL +3n/ZVydK+jGQ+rHopM4Eg1NGL5aRt+ANkKRDeTXohNlwfkCvI4xGA== =zI8W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go around repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for independence." -- Charles M. Beard

6 8

HOW TO GET 2%-10% MORE HITS - I N S T A N T L Y !
by Andrew 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We don't wish to send people email that hate spam... If you wish to be removed from future mailings, simply enter your email(s) in the box at http://www.removelist.com. Thanks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ HOW TO GET 2%-10% MORE HITS - I N S T A N T L Y ! SexSwap is the FASTEST and LARGEST Adult Banner Exchange. We help webmasters trade banners with 2,000 sites FREE. We show 22.45 banners every second, 2,000,000 banners a day. http://www.sexswap.com I am going to tell you 3 things: 1. How SexSwap can INCREASE your HITS 2. Why PICK SEXSWAP over the competition 3. How to JOIN SEXSWAP 1. HOW SEXSWAP CAN INCREASE YOUR HITS /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Ok, we have to push the pencil around a little bit, I know you hate math, but stay with me... 1. You JOIN team SexSwap Banner Exchange 2. You paste some code 3. You upload your banner Here comes the math. Every time your page loads (where you paste the code), we give you 1 credit..and for every 2 credits...we then show your banner on 1 of 2,000 adult sites. We make it easy to trade banners with 2,000 sites, and only use up one banner slot on your page. OK, more math...grade 3 stuff ;) ... let's say your page loads 1,000 times in one day, you get your banner shown 500 times FREE! And if your banner gets a 4% average click-thru rate, then you just got 40 free hits, or 2% more hits (everyday) for 3 minutes work. BUT IT GETS BETTER Many sites on SexSwap get a 20% click thru rate...if you have a ratio that high, then you get .2X500 or 100 clicks, which is 10% more hits. BUT IT GETS EVEN BETTER You can join as many times as you wish and paste different code on every damn page of your site...MULTIPLYING THE EFFECTS....so some people can ratchet 20-30% more hits, just buy JOINING SexSwap and by pasting the code on several pages of your site. 2. WHY CHOOSE SEXSWAP OVER THE COMPETITION /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ WE WANT YOU ON THE SEXSWAP TEAM! We are the largest adult banner exchange with 2,000+ member sites. We are the fastest banner exchange showing 20+ banners per second. We are the only banner exchange with 5 features dedicated to catching CROOKS! We keep the traffic CLEAN. We are the only banner exchange to publish the weekly SexSwap News that is chock full of tips and tricks...some members say that the newsletter is worth its weight in gold. 3. HOW TO JOIN SEXSWAP IN 2-3 MINUTES /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ We are the only adult banner exchange where the owner is the tech support and responds to email within hours...not days...I WILL HOLD YOUR HAND! We can't double your hits, but we can give you a 2%-10% boost in hits without pain. http://www.sexswap.com check us out, compare us to the competition, test our speed. http://www.sexswap.com Andy

1 0