- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Mykotronx
by Tommy the Tourist 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The latest Mykotronix dirt, pulled off of my source just last week. Scattered information, but perhaps this can be assembled with the other information to create a better profile. !(myko) ------------- TELEDYNE SYSTEMS COMPANY MYKOTRONX METROLOGY DEPT. 357 VANNESS WAY TORRANCE, CA FIELD SERVICES METROLOGY CALIBRATION SERVICE SPER PROPOSAL MET $2,000.00 $2,000.00 5/2/93 1 LOT $2,000.00 PLEASE MAKE RECALL PERIOD ONE (1) YEAR FOR EACH ITEM UNLESS ADVISED BY MYKOTRONX, INC. ATTN: DEAN BURNGART (881)886-2211/(881)717-6881 William H. Doy 1eTRWR2 20041 Space Park Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Bobby Daniels Caremella Mestriannatot Tim Hauersperger Bob Todd Rick Oberbbndorf Roger Brouwer Chris Curren Kathleen Fairley Rod Fujikawa Roger Brouwer Mike Furusawa Bill Greenfield Gerald Krause Russell Matsui Margaret McNeil Chris Curren Joe Heindl Jesse Mirilesie Landi Riley Rod Fujikawa Glenn Higuchi Scott Mobdderly Rick Oberndorf Wendy Goble Jason Moku Sam Morrissette Roy Usui Paul Smith Bob Todd Mr. Ed Martin AEROJET 1100 W Hollyvale Street Azusa, CA 91702 8403 Destruct Security Labels $106.78 4-5-93 One Hundred six dollars and 78/100*** Modern Data 4-5-93 Richard Takahashi Rob Ertgray GERALD KRAUSE JAN DOLPHIN 408-432-8180 SPY R US 2280 ZANKER ROAD, SUITE 207 SAN JOSE, CA 94135 6203 LITRONICK INDUSTRIES 2950 Redhill Ave. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 NCJ03078 FD70322040601 Myk-5 Ground Unit Serial Number s146 and l652EA $64,910 $93,820 10110111101 Acceptance Test Procedure/Test Report Report 2EA --J.Liaci AFCSC/LMJYP 4-8-93 BOB TO DDJ.LIACI210977-2356AFCSC/LMJYP Kelly AFB 250 Hall Blvd, Suite 112 San Antonio, TX 78243-7061 RJAMESLICCACIAFCSC/LMJYP Kelly AFB 250 Hall Blvd, Suite 112 San Antonio, TX MR JOHN WIMPY AFCSC/LMMLC Building 2028, Room 208 San Antonio, TX 78243-5000 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Elkridge Landing Road Linthicum, MD 21090-2902 Checkfree Corporation Problem Resolution Department P.O. box 987 Columbus, OH 43216-0897 RALPH O'CONNELL 1401 Woodbridge Road Baltimore, MD 21228 3939 S. Figureora Street Los Angeles, CA 90037 Ms. Hazel M. Smith MS:W3-7534 Harris Corporation GISD P.O. Box 98000 Melbourne, FL 32902 Mr. Vito DiGigilio VLSI Technology, Inc. 634 Balboa Blvd., Suite 100 Encino, CA 91316 R. Takahashi Mykotronx, Inc. 357 VanNess Way uite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 Contract Administrator 210977-2821 HQAFIC/LECCS 306 Wakkanai St., Suite 1 San Antonio, TX 78243 Defense Investigative Service Industrial Security Field Office(S53LB) Attention: Barry W. Hash 3605 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 405 Long Beach, CA 90807-4013 R. Todd Lee George 408 629-2880 938 Foothill Drive San Francisco CA 95123 Franchise Tax Board P.0.Box 942840 Sacramento, CA 94240-000 John C. Droge 414 Sixth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 902540 Mr. Tom Black GLANTZ & BLACK 25043 Narbonne Avenue Lomita CA 90717 Maryland Procurement Office 7318 Parkway Drive South Hanover, MD 21076 ---- VLSI Technologies, Inc. 6345 Balboa Blvd. Bldg #1 Suite 100 Encino, CA 91316 Attn: Dr. Freeman PE4-18-93 PD4-12-93 $75,000.00 4-14-93 Seventy-five thousand dollars and no/100 **** Mykotronx, Inc. Payroll Account #731081567 ---- Mr. Tom Black Glantz & Black 25043 Narbonne Avenue Lomita, Ca 90717 14 April 1993 Dear Tom, Per your request attached has is a list of our sales from 1-1-93 through 3-13-93. I've marked the items as Government or Non-government. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me on (310)533-8100. Sincerely, Patti ---- Maryland Procurement Office Attn: N22144(CEB)(MDA 904-92-G-0354/J.0.5001) 9800 Savage Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000 Cryptographic Support Center Logistics Management Branch 250 Hall Blvd., Ste 311 San Antonio, TX 78243-0760 ------------ To respond to the sender of this message, send mail to remailer(a)soda.berkeley.edu, starting your message with the following 8 lines: :: Response-Key: ideaclipper ====Encrypted-Sender-Begin==== MI@```%AS^P;+]AB?X9TW6\8WR:*P&2&#E66'?22E^>4!79;]2Q5!'U$<<JHX M`"[QYE??E1ASFX#P?M@\HN3EX*PWZYQ!,?+42=@Y22SIOI/F+;(_!LI82<S^ #V?,2 ====Encrypted-Sender-End====

1 0

message brokering
by Matt Thomlinson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

nobody says: Is there someone out there who would like to act as a broker (for a small fee, natch), so that I can maintain rigorous anonymity while trading? This seems like a good way to earn some ghostmarks! I'm sure *someone* will take you up on this offer. Alternatively, you could perhaps do business through the penet remailer...? mt Matt Thomlinson University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. phone: (206) 548-9804 Check my home page -- ftp://ftp.u.washington.edu/public/phantom/home.html PGP 2.2 key available via email, or finger phantom(a)hardy.u.washington.edu

2 1

More FOIA docs online at EFF
by Stanton McCandlish 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

A few new arrivals at ftp.eff.org that may be of immediate interest. The first is a recent bill, scheduled for markup very soon. EFF urges you to ask your Senators to co-sponsor and support this bill. Those following EFF Boardmember John Gilmore's FOIA battle with NSA, the Justice Dept. and other recalcitrant agencies will know why this is so important. For those that don't, the issue in a nutshell is that the original FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) did not adquately cover records that are not in hardcopy format, such as computer files; it granted overly-broad excuses to not release documents, and provided for few penalties for violating FOIA. As a result, secretive agencies have been breaking the law with impunity, vastly exceeding the mandated times in which the law requires them to respond to FOIA requests from citizens, and have been using technicalities, vague passages, and filmy excuses to withold important information that belongs to the American people. This new bill, supported by EFF, aims to correct these problems, and ensure that FOIA works the way it should. The other file is adequately described by it's entry from our /pub/README.changes file, excerpted below. 05/12/94 - added important recent bill supported by EFF: Electronic Freedom of Information Improvement Act (S1782), sponsored by Sens. Leahy & Brown. Please ask your Senators to co-sponsor this bill to "fix the bugs" in FOIA, and prevent agencies from illegally delaying and refusing to release information to the public, and also mandate procedures for dealing with electronic information as well as hardcopy: /pub/EFF/Issues/Activism/FOIA/ e-foia.bill - added 10/4/93 Clinton & Reno memos to heads of Depts. and agencies on FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) issues: /pub/EFF/Issues/Activism/FOIA/foia_clinton_reno_93.memos - Clinton urges agencies to keep pace with their FOIA obligations, saying "I therefore call upon all Federal departments and agencies to renew their commitment to the Freedom of Information Act, to its underlying principles of government openness, and to its sound administration." Something that also may be of interest: - added new E-Mail Policy in Federal Government: Report of the Electronic Mail Task Force Prepared for the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Apr. 1, 1994 - /pub/EFF/Policy/Govt_online/ federal_email_policy_omb_report -- Stanton McCandlish * mech(a)eff.org * Electronic Frontier Found. OnlineActivist "In a Time/CNN poll of 1,000 Americans conducted last week by Yankelovich Partners, two-thirds said it was more important to protect the privacy of phone calls than to preserve the ability of police to conduct wiretaps. When informed about the Clipper Chip, 80% said they opposed it." - Philip Elmer-Dewitt, "Who Should Keep the Keys", TIME, Mar. 14 1994

1 0

Re: San Jose Mercury News Washington News in Brief Blurb
by collsc＠snowbird.aud.alcatel.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > Thursday May 12, 1994 > > ELECTRONIC SNOOPING TAKES SHARP UPTURN > > Wiretaps and electronic monitoring by federal agents, > primarily against suspected drug traffickers, grew by a > third during the first year of the Clinton administration, > the largest increase in a decade. > [N722] > This from the same Administration which rationalizes its attempts to emasculate cryptography by citing the need for and widespread use of such methods. Coincidence? You decide. +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Scott Collins Alcatel Network Systems| |collsc(a)aud.alcatel.com Richardson, Texas| | Even if my employers agreed with this, they would never admit it. | | GCS d? -p+ c++@ l u e- m* s+/ n- h+ f? g-(+++) w+@ t-- r- y? | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1 0

Postal Service and IRS mull national identity cards (fwd)
by harry＠starbase.sj.unisys.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I know you are interested in electronic privacy issues, so I thought you would like to see the following article. Yikes! -- Harry Subject: Postal Service and IRS mull national identity cards Forwarded-by: bostic(a)vangogh.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Bostic) Forwarded-by: kole(a)hydra.convex.com (John P. Kole) Forwarded-by: cavasin(a)bach.convex.com (Vince Cavasin) >From Digital Media, May 9, 1994. EVER FEEL LIKE YOU'RE BEING WATCHED? YOU WILL.... Postal Service and IRS mull national identity cards, Clinton to sign orders Digital Media has learned that the Clinton administration is debating not if, but how, to create a card that every American will need in order to interact with any federal government agency. Combined with two potential executive orders and the Postal Service's designs on putting its stamp on personal and business electronic transactions, the card could open a window on every nuance of American personal and business life. The wrangling among the administration, the U.S. Postal Service, the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Defense, emerged into the public eye at this April's CardTech/SecureTech Conference. The gathering of security experts was convened to discuss applications for smart card and PCMCIA memory card technologies in business and government. The Postal Service, at the conference presented a proposal for a "general purpose U.S. services smartcard," which individuals and companies would use to authenticate their identities when sending and receiving electronic mail, transferring funds and interacting with government agencies, such as the I.R.S., Veterans Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services. President Clinton is also considering signing two executive orders that would greatly expand the government's access to personal records, including an order that would allow the I.R.S. to monitor individual bank accounts and automatically collect taxes based on the results, said sources close to the White House. The collection service will be presented as a convenient way to avoid filling out a tax return. The White House did not respond to requests for comments about this report. The Post Office: We deliver for you. The Postal Service's U.S. Card would be designed to use either smart cards (plastic cards with an embedded microprocessor carrying a unique number that can be read by a electromagnetic scanner and linked to computerized records stored on a network) or PCMCIA cards, which can contain megabytes of personal information. (You've probably seen this type card in AT&T's "You Will" ad campaign, which shows a doctor inserting a woman's card in a reader in order to access a recording of a sonogram). The Postal Service said it is considering AT&T and other companies' smart card technologies. In a slide presentation at the conference, Postal representative Chuck Chamberlain outlined how an individual's U.S. Card would be automatically connected with the Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Treasury, the I.R.S., the banking system, and a central database of digital signatures for use in authenticating electronic mail and transactions. The U.S. Card is only a proposal, Chamberlain insists. Yet the Postal Service is prepared to put more than a hundred million of the cards in citizens' pockets within months of administration approval, he said. "We've been trying to convince people [in the different agencies] to do just one card, otherwise, we're going to end up with two or three cards," said Chamberlain. He said in addition to the healthcare card proposed by President Clinton last year, various government agencies are forwarding plans for a personal records card and a transactions (or "e-purse") card. Chamberlain said the I.R.S in particular is pursuing plans for an identity card for taxpayers. Don't leave home without it. Though he did not name the U.S. Card at the time, Postmaster General Marvin Runyon suggested that the Postal Service offer electronic mail certification services during testimony before the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee in March. The proposal is clearly intended as a way to sustain the Postal Service's national role in the information age, since it would give the agency a role in virtually every legally-binding electronic transaction made by U.S. citizens. For instance: % When sending or receiving electronic mail, U.S. Card users would be able to check the authenticity of a digital signature to screen out impostors. % Banking transactions (notably credit card purchases) that depend on authentication of the participants identities and an audit trail, would be registered in Postal Service systems. % Veterans, or for that matter college students and welfare recipients, could check their federal benefits using the identification data on their U.S. Cards. % Visitors to an emergency room would have instant access to medical records at other hospitals, as well as their health insurance information. These examples may seem benign separately, but collectively they paint a picture of a citizen's or business's existence that could be meddlesome at best and downright totalitarian at worst. Will buying a book at a gay bookstore with a credit card that authenticates the transaction through the Postal Service open a Naval officer up to court martial? If you have lunch with a business associate on a Saturday at a family restaurant, will the IRS rule the expense non-deductible before you can even claim it? "There won't be anything you do in business that won't be collected and analyzed by the government," said William Murray, an information system security consultant to Deloitte and Touche who saw Chamberlain's presentation. "This [National Information Infrastructure] is a better surveillance mechanism than Orwell or the government could have imagined. This goddamned thing is so pervasive and the propensity to connect to it is so great that it's unstoppable." Deep Roots; Deep Pockets; Long History. Chamberlain said the Postal Service has been working for "a couple years" on the information system to back up the U.S. Card. He said the project was initiated by the Department of Defense, which wanted a civilian agency to create a national electronic communications certification authority that could be connected to its Defense Messaging System. Chamberlain said the Postal Service has also consulted with the National Security Agency, proponents of the Clipper encryption chip which hides the contents of messages from all but government agencies, like law enforcement. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Ames Research Laboratories in Mountain View, Calif. carried out the research and development work for Clipper. "We're designing a national framework for supporting business-quality authentication," said John Yin, the engineer heading up the U.S. Card- related research for NASA Ames' advanced networking applications group. "This is not specifically with just the Postal Service. We'll be offering services to other agencies and to third-party commercial companies that want to build other services on the card." For example, VISA or American Express could link their credit services to the U.S. Card. Yin, who works on Defense Messaging Systems applications, said his group has collaborated with "elements of Department of Defense" for the past year, but would not confirm the participation of the National Security Agency, a Department of Defense agency. The NSA is specifically prohibited from creating public encryption systems by the Computer Security Act of 1987. Yin also would not comment on the budget for the project, which other sources said was quite large and has spanned more than two years. A false sense of security? According to Yin, the cards would allow individuals or businesses to choose any encryption technology. "It's not our approach to say, 'Here's the standard, take it our leave it,'" he said. "We're not trying to create a monopoly, rather it's an infrastructure for interoperability on which a whole variety of services can be built." Yet, NASA, which is a participant in the CommerceNet electric marketplace consortium will "suggest" to its partners that they adopt the U.S. Card certification infrastructure, he said. The reality is that government agencies' buying power usually drives the market to adopt a particular technology -- not unlike the way the Texas Board of Education, the largest single purchaser of textbooks in the U.S., sets the standard for the content of American classroom curricula. Since, the administration has already mandated use of Clipper and its data-oriented sibling, the Tesserae chip, in federal systems it's fairly certain that the law enforcement-endorsed chips will find their way into most, if not all, U.S. Cards. Even in the unlikely event that one government agency should weather the pressure and pass on the Clipper chip, it's still possible to trace the source, destination, duration and time of transactions conducted between Clippered and non-Clippered devices. "Most of this shift [in privacy policy] is apparently being done by executive order at the initiative of bureaucracy, and without any Congressional oversight or Congressional concurrence, " Murray said. "They are not likely to fail. You know, Orwell said that bureaucrats, simply doing what bureaucrats do, without motivation or intent, will use technology to enslave the people." EDITOR'S NOTE: Digital Media has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for Clinton and Bush Administration, Postal Service, NSA, Department of Defense, NASA, I.R.S. and other documents related to the creation of the U.S. Card proposal. -- Mitch Ratcliffe Copyright 1994 by Mitch Ratcliffe and Seybold Publications. Digital Media: A Seybold Report 444 De Haro St., Ste. 128 San Francisco, Calif. 94107 415.575.3775 dmedia(a)netcom.com Mitch Ratcliffe Editor in Chief 415.575.3775 office 206.581.1892 home godsdog(a)netcom.com

1 0

remailer abuse
by Eli Brandt 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The jarthur remailer is presently down because of a twit who blitzed much of Caltech and JPL with a car-repair ad. A Caltech postmaster has advised me that he has moved on to using rebma. Remailer admins who don't need this kind of hassle may wish to block messages with "BARKEV'S AUTO CENTER" in the body. Eli ebrandt(a)hmc.edu finger for PGP key.

1 0

Re: Cypherpunks Goals: Bad debate drives out good debate
by Mike Markley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

| | How about auto-moderation? I came up with this idea a while back for | automatically moderating mailing lists. Here's how it works: | | A newsgroup is set up as moderated, and the posts are emailed to the | moderator (as usual). The "moderator" is a mail-to-news gateway that | posts the articles if the author isn't on the disapproved list, and | also automatically cancels articles that don't have the right "approved" | header and aren't digitally signed by the moderator. | | If a person becomes a nuisance, people send their votes in to the | moderator-robot, and it tallies the votes. If within XXX days more thumbs | down votes are received than thumbs up votes, the person is placed on the | disapproved list. | | The main advantage is, it's fast and easy to set up. Comments? Sounds like a very easy scheme to break. Say I suddenly decide that I don't like your posts or Tim Mays posts. I can get you kicked off by using anonymous accounts to say that you're a nuisance. It seems to me that leaving the list open is better than trying to control it. An example of the danger of automation has already been shown on this list. Last week someone unsubscribed everybody using the automatic features of the remailer. I'd rather have access to all of the posts and make my own decisions about the contents rather than have a potential for one aggrevated individual take out some meaningful content because of a personal vendetta. Mike | | Ed Carp, N7EKG/VE3 ecarp(a)netcom.com 519/824-3307 | Finger ecarp(a)netcom.com for PGP 2.3a public key an88744(a)anon.penet.fi | If you want magic, let go of your armor. Magic is so much stronger than | steel! -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever" | | ===================================================== Mike Markley <mmarkley(a)microsoft.com> I'm not a Microsoft spokesperson. All opinions expressed here are mine. ===================================================== |

3 2

Case law re ITAR and export control
by greg＠ideath.goldenbear.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I've been reading more about export controls, and found these cases which may be of interest: US v Elder, 579 F.2d 516 (9th Cir, 1978). Prohibition on export of technical data includes provision of assistance to foreign manufacturers of items which would be on the Munitions List if manufactured domestically. This prohibition does not interfere with First Amend. free speech protection when narrowly interpreted to apply only to tech. data "significantly and directly related" to items on the Munitions List. Conviction under 22 USCA 1934 (since repealed, but similar to 22 USCA 2778, which applies now) requires that where tech data has both military and nonmilitary uses, prosecution must establish accused knew or had reason to know of its application towards a prohibited purpose. US v Van Hee, 531 F.2d 354 (6th Cir, 1976). Personal knowledge can constitute "technical data" for purposes of regulations restricting export of munitions. Exemption applying to "public domain" technical data applies only to technical data in published form. Exemption for public domain tech data must be claimed at time of export, not at trial, and package/letter must be marked as claimed exempt. US v. Donas-Botto, 363 F.Supp 191 (E.D.Mich, S.D. 1973). "Technical data" as used in the ITAR includes "technical knowledge", and its transmission is not protected by the First Amendment. The US also claims the right to prosecute for violations of the ITAR committed by non-citizens while located in foreign countries, even where the subject matter is owned by a foreign government. See US v Evans, 667 F.Supp 974 (S.D.N.Y, 1987) for a chilling story indeed. I'm going to be on vacation for a few weeks, and probably won't be checking the list; in order to avoid misunderstanding, the summaries above are my own and I believe they're accurate. I haven't found anything which overturns or disagrees with the above. My own ideas about "freedom of speech" don't match the above, but that's probably not surprising. My questions about the above: o When does export take place? When the technical data leaves the country, or when it is transferred to a foreign party? (my guess is the latter, at least with respect to "technical knowledge") o Do I need a license from the State Department if I know how to do RSA and I want to go bar-hopping in Tijuana? (just kidding, but there's a real question in there somewhere.) Discussion on the list about export regulation has focussed on violations of the ITAR; but prosecution is also possible under 22 USC 2778, with maximum penalties of $1M and 10 years in prison. Ouch. If there's going to be an LA-area C-punks meeting, will someone please send E-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.5 iQCVAgUBLdKAqX3YhjZY3fMNAQEXWQP9H+WGzXZYki4BXYJI1C4dYQItXHIxAj/9 rKpu5qvnLk3F/cG+vwBB7d6C9g/hRAJQwYSxw1OEI/GG4Es6rqDmpaD7oQeu+mX0 IV/B89gUQuP/YbARLlgH2nTbpxk8gXNQnRDXQlhjJzIzs+yiRGrL9ggTNfNTYh9R AOkTBh7aRTg= =/0G2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: NSA Cheif Counsel in Wired (Rebuttal)
by Jeff Davis 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- A little further along in the AP story on the record level of Clinton Administration wire taps, Micheal J. Sniffen states: In a section on surveillances completed in 1993, the report said the longest and most expensive federal eavesdropping was accomplished by a microphone placed inside a New Jersey lawyer's office in a racketeering case. The microphone actually operated 435 days, overhearing a total of 65 people, at a cost of $517,673. ...The government said in court, "the purpose of utilizing the law offices ... was to evade electronic surveillance by fraudulently creating the appearance that these were legally proper meetings." This microphone recorded conversations in the office, not the telephone. As I stated to Dr. Dorthy Denning of Georgetown University, escrowed encryption is unnecessary for surveillance. In addition to "bugs", intellegence agencies also provide long range listening technology to the enforcement agencies like the FBI and DEA. Organized criminals don't use the phone to discuss business, it can be tapped. This sort of blows a hole in Stuart Baker's arguments for escrowed encryption being necessary in law enforcement. The next time he offends someone with his tired trig joke, I would hope that he is ask to rebut this. As well as to estimate how many conversations and participants are actually involved in the given figure of 333 1993 "wiretaps." Long range listening was found to fall under federal "wiretap" rules in the Smalldone case in Denver during the summer of 1982. Try to FOIA that info. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLdKerV/ScHuGXWgVAQFziAQAuYTNTKjaqTWaOO3C42yKCWLM7+kU1gXp 4sGxHGQKfsDP333zLNA+ETGuVfs6si5YQVbsnlGVdS/v36oZp8bUj/8MgWYKLj66 1jRNf4mPl0Mb5LL7InrUwjKCqmOb/GLuHK7F0cHzZbsBE2FkmIqi27AcgJ/8nMxl lFiBbzWrBk4= =I+yV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- PGP PUBLIC KEY via finger! JAFEFFM Speaking & Thinking For Myself! * eagle(a)deeptht.armory.com email info(a)eff.org * *** O U T L A W S On The E L E C T R O N I C F R O N T I E R **** ***** Committed to Free Public Internet Access for World Peace *****

1 0

Yet Another T-Shirt Proposal
by perry＠imsi.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Should I ever run in to Stewart A. Baker, I want to be wearing a T-Shirt that says "I oppose Clipper because I'm a bitter guy who couldn't go to Woodstock". (Actually, something pithier would be nice, but you get the idea. Maybe "Mad at the NSA for making me do my Trig Homework"?) Perry

2 1