- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

CfP: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2002
by Roger Dingledine 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

Can you pass this on to your (dcsb/etc) lists? Thanks, --Roger ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CALL FOR PAPERS WORKSHOP ON PRIVACY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES 2002 Apr 14-15, 2002 San Francisco, CA, USA Workshop web site: http://www.pet2002.org/ Privacy and anonymity are increasingly important in the online world. Corporations and governments are starting to realize their power to track users and their behavior, and restrict the ability to publish or retrieve documents. Approaches to protecting individuals, groups, and even companies and governments from such profiling and censorship have included decentralization, encryption, and distributed trust. Building on the success of the first anonymity and unobservability workshop (LNCS 2009, held in Berkeley in July 2000), this second workshop addresses the design and realization of such anonymity and anti-censorship services for the Internet and other communication networks. We are holding this workshop adjacent to the Twelfth Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy (CFP2002) for convenience, but we are not affiliated with that conference. The workshop seeks submissions from academia and industry presenting novel research on all theoretical and practical aspects of privacy technologies, as well as experimental studies of fielded systems. We encourage submissions from other communities such as law and business that present these communities' perspectives on technological issues. We will publish accepted papers in proceedings in the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) series. Suggested topics include but are not restricted to: * Efficient realization of privacy services * Techniques for and against traffic analysis * Attacks on anonymity systems * New concepts for anonymity systems * Novel relations of payment mechanisms and anonymity * Models for anonymity and unobservability * Models for threats to privacy * Techniques for censorship resistance * Resource management in anonymous systems * Pseudonyms, linkability, and trust * Policy and human rights -- anonymous systems in practice * Fielded systems and privacy enhancement techniques for existing systems * Frameworks for new systems developers IMPORTANT DATES Submission deadline December 10, 2001 Acceptance notification February 11, 2002 Camera-ready copy for preproceedings March 11, 2002 Camera-ready copy for proceedings May 15, 2002 GENERAL CHAIR Adam Shostack, Zero Knowledge Systems (adam(a)zeroknowledge.com) PROGRAM COMMITTEE John Borking, Dutch Data Protection Authority Lance Cottrell, Anonymizer.com Roger Dingledine, Reputation Technologies (co-chair, arma(a)mit.edu) Hannes Federrath, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Germany Markus Jakobsson, RSA Laboratories Marit Koehntopp, Independent Centre for Privacy Protection, SH, Germany Andreas Pfitzmann, Dresden University of Technology, Germany Avi Rubin, AT&T Labs - Research Paul Syverson, Naval Research Lab (co-chair, syverson(a)itd.nrl.navy.mil) Michael Waidner, IBM Zurich Research Lab PAPER SUBMISSIONS Submitted papers must not substantially overlap with papers that have been published or that are simultaneously submitted to a journal or a conference with proceedings. Papers should be at most 15 pages excluding the bibliography and well-marked appendices (using 11-point font and reasonable margins), and at most 20 pages total. Authors are encouraged to follow Springer LNCS format in preparing their submissions. <http://www.springer.de/comp/lncs/authors.html> Committee members are not required to read the appendices and the paper should be intelligible without them. The paper should start with the title, names of authors and an abstract. The introduction should give some background and summarize the contributions of the paper at a level appropriate for a non-specialist reader. We will publish accepted papers in proceedings in the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) series after the workshop. During the workshop preproceedings will be made available. Final versions are not due until after the workshop, giving the authors the opportunity to revise their papers based on discussions during the meeting. Submissions can be made in Postscript or PDF format. To submit a paper, send a plain ASCII text email to the program chairs (emails: arma(a)mit.edu, syverson(a)itd.nrl.navy.mil) containing the title and abstract of the paper, the authors' names, email and postal addresses, phone and fax numbers, and identification of the contact author. To the same message, attach your submission (as a MIME attachment). Papers must be received by December 10, 2001. Notification of acceptance or rejection will be sent to authors no later than February 11, 2002, and authors will have the opportunity to revise for the preproceedings version by March 11, 2002. Submission implies that, if accepted, the author(s) agree to publish in the proceedings and to sign a standard Springer copyright release, and also that an author of the paper will present it at the workshop. Final versions (due after the workshop) need to comply with the instructions for authors made available by Springer. --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

CfP: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2002 (fwd)
by Jim Choate 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:46:56 -0400 From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> To: dcsb(a)ai.mit.edu, Digital Bearer Settlement List <dbs(a)philodox.com>, cryptography(a)wasabisystems.com, mac-crypto(a)vmeng.com Subject: CfP: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2002 --- begin forwarded text

1 0

Re: Anonymous Posting
by Faustine 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

Tim wrote: On Thursday, August 23, 2001, at 02:22 PM, "Faustine" wrote: > me. But if you're one of the anonymouses who won't sign your name to > insults and baseless accusations? Well, I'd say you'd be better off the > way you are. Just dont expect me to waste time reading it. > Ironically, this comes from one who uses an obvious (but unsigned!) nym. >She/he/it/they criticizes others for "won't sign your name" posts, while >we have no way of knowing who she/he/it/they is/are. Check the headers, anything I say is accountable to "authenticated user a3495". At least this way, people I irritate have a pretty good idea who to bitch back at and where to hold a grudge. Obviously. And if you honestly believe I don't bring any value to the list, filter me. >This entity also claims the list is polluted with pseudonymous No I didn't. > and anonymous posts. >Ironically, I agree. I think you mainly have your bloomers in a bunch because I told your anonymous ass-kiss toady to get a spine. Filter me. ~Faustine.

1 0

Sorry to see you go.
by kinkymailer＠list.emailbucks.com 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

1 0

Re: Quantum Computation/Cryptography at Los Alamos
by Faustine 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

Everyone here is perfectly capable of reading my posts and deciding for themselves--why the need for the grand pronouncement? Now that you've told everyone how to think, why not use your filter file and get it over with. These elaborate, drawn-out "thinking man's" variations on the "you poopy head" theme are a complete waste of time. Who would have ever imagined that someone so intelligent and thoughtful could be so petty. ~Faustine. On Thursday, August 23, 2001, at 03:17 PM, Faustine wrote: > Los Alamos develops quantum crypto system > By Chappell Brown > Electrical Engineering Times > (08/23/01, 1:06 p.m. EST) > > > LOS ALAMOS, N.M. Engineers at Los Alamos National Laboratory have > developed what they believe is a practical quantum cryptographic system. > The system features two portable units that can encrypt and decrypt > information transmitted via photons. Experiments have shown that >Faustine is becoming the new Jim Choate, regurgitating old topics, >lecturing us on what she/he/it thinks we don't know, and forwarding >items which were stale years ago. >Clue: This list is not just a dumping ground for anything with the word >"crypto" in it. >Metaclue: get a clue. >ObFaustineWhine/Predictable: "Some of us are Important Researchers, >being paid to sit in our cubicles and surf the Net. Just because we >learned about this list last month does not mean we don't have the >_right_ to forward everything we learn about crypto to this list!" >--Tim May

1 0

Re: Not black helicopters, but dark green ones ( Off Topic
by A. Melon 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

Mike wrote -- > > What was she so afraid of? Aerial rape? I was just pissed off when the > shitheads would fly over as low as they could. I've seen A10's, > helicopters and fighters. They're really annoying when you're trying to > cast a fly and enjoy some serene isolation. They should test their shit > in Macedonia or Nevada. Next time I'll bring my particle beam weapon and > scorch their paint a bit. No shit! I was in a canoe once on a very backwoods lake, nobody else within miles -- a fucking F16 came over so low he spun my canoe around almost swamped it. Another time, in another state, a helicopter came into my yard so low he went _around_ my house, not over it, did a power turn in the front yard, and came back around the side of the house again. He was extremely lucky, the only gun I could grab that quick was a .22 pistol. I put 6 rounds into his canopy. He was so close I could see his face clearly. If I'd had my .44 mag, he'd of been one dead asshole. I got a bit nervous afterwards, was wondering if the cops would show up, but then realized there was no way in hell he could report it, he would have lost his pilot's license for that cowboy bullshit. They are required by law to stay 500' minimum above private property.

1 0

No Obligation Trial!
by watercoolers＠xyone.com 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

1 0

Your Apple ID Information
by AppleID＠apple.com 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

As you requested, here is your Apple ID information: Apple ID : cypherpunks(a)toad.com Password : writecode Thank you for your interest in Apple and its products.

1 0

Funny story about Napster and IP
by Tim May 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

I heard a funny story from someone on CNBC this morning (the singer in a rock group called "Train"). He was answering a question about how Napster helps and hurts bands. He said that bands just starting out really were helped a lot by Napster, as people downloaded music. Then a band gets to a certain success level and decides it doesn't like this downloading. The funny story was about how someone was printing up and selling "Napster" sweatshirts and t-shirts at concerts. Napster was Not Amused and sued. I guess the word "irony" really isn't in their dictionary. --Tim May

1 0

max payne 4420
by putfez＠hotmail.com 24 Aug '01

24 Aug '01

nuykockupolhjvbnynwrubdldsoyiyokcspodlbpvwclrpvzyewtegywzkwedkvmywskuuwfzvcusjti

1 0