- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Just a simple q...
by Naser 29 Oct '01

29 Oct '01

Hi, Are U professional hacker?

1 0

Bush gives green light to CIA for assassination of named terrorists (fwd)
by Jei 29 Oct '01

29 Oct '01

Assassination Politics adopted by the US president.. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 03:27:16 +0100 From: Mario Profaca <Mario.Profaca(a)zg.tel.hr> Reply-To: spynews(a)yahoogroups.com To: "[Spy News]" <spynews(a)yahoogroups.com> Subject: [Spy News] Bush gives green light to CIA for assassination of named terrorists Bush gives green light to CIA for assassination of named terrorists http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,582507,00.html 'Covert killings to take in less important al-Qaida figures' David Gow in New York Monday October 29, 2001 The Guardian President Bush has given the CIA an explicit go-ahead to carry out covert missions to assassinate Osama bin Laden and his supporters around the world, effectively lifting a 25-year ban on such activities. The US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, confirmed reports of such a move yesterday by telling CNN that the US would be acting in self-defence in carrying out such missions. The Washington Post reported yesterday that Mr Bush has decided that executive orders banning assassinations since a series of botched attempts in the 1960s and 1970s allow him to single out a named terrorist or terrorists for death by covert action. Mr Rumsfeld said: "It is not possible to defend yourself against terrorists at every single location in the world and at every single moment. "The only way to deal with terrorists is to take the battle to them and find them and root them out and that's self-defence. We're going after these people and their organisations and capabilities and to stop them killing Americans." The US president, according to senior government officials quoted by the Post, signed an order last month known as an intelligence "finding", which broadens the list of potential targets beyond Bin Laden and his immediate circle of some 15 operational planners - and beyond Afghanistan. The CIA, pilloried in some quarters along with the FBI last month for its fatal failure to detect the movements and plans of the al-Qaida terrorist network, is said to be willing and able to "take the lives of terrorists designated by the president". Mr Bush has apparently circumvented the legal constraints on clandestine killing missions imposed since the Church committee found in 1975 that plots against five foreign leaders under presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nixon had been organised in terms "so ambiguous that it is difficult to be certain at what levels assassination activity was known and authorised". The new presidential order, drawing on one signed by President Clinton against al-Qaida three years ago, apparently overcomes such problems by making plain that responsibility and accountability rest with the president and his senior colleagues. "I would want the president's guidance to be as clear as it could be, including the names of individuals. You have got to have the political levels behind you so the intelligence officers are not left hanging," the recently retired CIA deputy director, John Gannon, told the Post. But history suggests that covert assassinations remain fraught with danger and carry a high risk of failure. Jeffrey Richelson, an intelligence historian and author of a new book on the CIA, said of pre-1975 efforts: "They never succeeded in killing anyone. They were the gang that couldn't shoot straight." Agents carried out numerous inept missions to kill Fidel Castro, using among other botched devices bacteria in his favourite type of cigar, an exploding seashell, and a poisoned wet suit. Other botched missions were undertaken in central America, the Congo and Iraq, though Mr Richelson has said the CIA did significantly aid the assassins of Che Guevara, and, indirectly, the overthrow of Chile's Salvador Allende in 1973. Yesterday's report suggested that President Bush's order could extend well beyond the al-Qaida network concentrated around Bin Laden and the FBI's 22 "most-wanted" terrorists, with the CIA debating how many of the 35 or more countries identified as places where the terrorist network is active could figure on the list. Andrew Card, White House chief of staff, said yesterday on NBC's Meet the Press: "It could take years but we are going to do everything we can to rout the terrorists in Afghanistan and then get them all around the world." Financiers of the al-Qaida - "the Gucci guys, the guys who write the cheques", according to one unnamed CIA official - could also be targets but the report said it was unclear whether Mr Bush had "signed orders that would amount to individual death warrants". --- Messages to Mario Profaca may be published at Mario's Cyberspace Station (http://mprofaca.cro.net/mainmenu.html) or/and forwarded to its associated Spy News list (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews) Please do indicate if your message is not intended for this. FYI: This mail sent by Mario Profaca is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.292 / Virus Database: 157 - Release Date: 26. 10. 01 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/TySplB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ============================================== SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to Mario's Cyberspace Station http://mprofaca.cro.net/mainmenu.html ============================================== *** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to SPYNEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------------------------------- SPY NEWS home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews To change your subscription mode to Daily Digest (one message a day) send a blank message: mailto:spynews-digest@yahoogroups.com To unsubscribe SPYNEWS send a blank message: mailto:spynews-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Mario Profaca, independent journalist, SPY NEWS eGroup list owner, editor & moderator, is a member of of the Committee of Concerned Journalists, an initiative administered through the offices of the Project for Excellence in Journalism in Washington, D.C. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

MPAA and RIAA Lobby the President for Targetted Assassinations of Cyber Terrorists and DMCA Violators
by Jei 29 Oct '01

29 Oct '01

> On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Jon O . wrote: > > > > > > > http://aibohack.com/letter2.htm > > > > It has become an Internet cliche to post letters from big companies sent to individuals threatening them with the DCMA. > > Well, we won't have to put up with them letters any more! ;-) > > Now that the DMCA violations can be seen as terrorism and that Bush has > authorized extrajudicial assassinations of suspected terrorists, soon we > can just expect to get a bullet in the head. Us non-Americans that is. :-) > > Bush gives green light to CIA for assassination of named terrorists > http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,582507,00.html > > Targets specified in 35 countries. > > Are *you* one of them? > > And just where did that mp3 file come from, eh?? Can you PROVE it??? > > Don't believe me? Just think how big lobbying power the MPAA and RIAA > have in the US, and that Bush has never hesistated to lick the butt of > big business. >

1 0

Anthrax Illuminator
by Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer 29 Oct '01

29 Oct '01

http://www.anthraxexterminate.com/ "The Anthrax Exterminator is a portable hand-held and battery operated unit similar in appearance to a flashlight which allows people to easily zap Anthrax and sterilize surfaces such as your mail box, the mail itself, desks, counters at home or in the workplace as well as thousands of other surfaces that people come in contact with everyday."

1 0

Short notice: Anybody interested in Inst. Msging and Crypto wanna speak at conference Wednesday, Santa Clara?
by Brad Templeton 29 Oct '01

29 Oct '01

This is Brad Templeton from the EFF. This Wednesday I'm moderating a panel at Jeff Pulver's semi-annual conference on Presence and Instant Messaging. It's a smallish (couple of hundred) conference where you'll see most of the commercial players in instant messaging, with the very notable exception of AOL. However, having attended this conference I have found that most of the people there pay little attention to issues of security and privacy in the IM world. Sometimes for real reasons (most IM is forced by NAT and firewalls to be routed through central servers) but often times simply because they haven't bothered. The panel I am moderating is on these topics of Presence and Instant Messaging, and due to various circumstances, right now I have only 2 other speakers on it, who will speak about the privacy and security work being done by two standards bodies, the PAM formum, and the IETF SIP working group. I have my own talk on the design and political issues, but I can move a lot of that into my plenary talk later in the day where I want to get those issues out. In particular I am interested in technologically interesting projects or research to allow privacy, encryption and anonymity in instant messaging, and also in presence data and location-aware devices. (Part of the conference is also on location aware services, E911 manadated location-aware phones etc.) So I apologize for not asking until today, but if you have done any work in these areas you would like to talk about briefly, I could have a slot for you, and get you free attendance at this normally $2,000 conference. Last time Lenny Foner gave a great talk on his work. The conference info is at http://www.pulver.com/pim/ and my session is This Wedesday, Oct 31, at 9:45am. It is at the Marriott in Santa Clara. Sorry as well for posting without regularly reading cypherpunks, but I need to keep my email load down.

1 0

are you ready? 5636
by saint＠bazares.com 28 Oct '01

28 Oct '01

1 0

Good news!
by no＠otvet.net 28 Oct '01

28 Oct '01

îÁ ÓÔÏÌ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÀ ! îÁÓÔÁÌÏ ×ÒÅÍÑ ÐÏÄ×ÅÓÔÉ ÉÔÏÇ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔÏ× É ÚÁÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÔØ ÂÕÄÕÝÅÊ ÇÏÄ ÄÌÑ ÎÏ×ÏÊ ÄÅÌÏ×ÏÊ ÁËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ!!! ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ "ðòïòù÷ ÷ õðòá÷ìåîéé" - ×ÏÔ, ÞÔÏ ÐÏÍÏÖÅÔ... óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÐÒÅÄÎÁÚÎÁÞÅÎ ÄÌÑ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÊ. ïÎ ÄÁÅÔ ÚÎÁÎÉÑ É ÍÅÔÏÄÉËÉ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ É ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ, ËÁË É ÞÔÏ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÍÅÎÑÔØ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÄÌÑ ÕÓÐÅÛÎÏÇÏ ÒÁÚ×ÉÔÉÑ. óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÂÕÄÅÔ ÉÎÔÅÒÅÓÅÎ × ÐÅÒ×ÕÀ ÏÞÅÒÅÄØ ÔÅÍ, ËÔÏ ÐÏÓÔÏÑÎÎÏ ÚÁÄÁÅÔ ÓÅÂÅ ×ÏÐÒÏÓÙ: - ËÁË ÄÁÌØÛÅ ÒÁÚ×É×ÁÔØ ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÀ? - ÞÔÏ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÉÚÍÅÎÉÔØ × ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÉ ÄÌÑ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ? - ËÏÇÄÁ ÍÏÖÎÏ ××ÏÄÉÔØ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÑ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÄÌÑ ÕÌÕÞÛÅÎÉÑ ÓÉÔÕÁÃÉÉ? ðÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÁ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÎÁ ÎÁ ÏÓÎÏ×Å ÏÐÙÔÁ ÒÅÆÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ òÏÓÓÉÊÓËÉÈ ÐÒÅÄÐÒÉÑÔÉÊ É ×ÅÄÅÔ Å£ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔ ÐÏ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÏÎÎÏÍÕ ÒÁÚ×ÉÔÉÀ, Á×ÔÏÒ ÍÎÏÇÉÈ ÓÔÁÔÅÊ × ÏÂÌÁÓÔÉ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ, ÐÒÅÐÏÄÁ×ÁÔÅÌØ ËÕÒÓÁ "óÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÉÊ ÍÅÎÅÄÖÍÅÎÔ" ÄÌÑ M.B.A ÞÅÌÏ×ÅË Ó 5 ÌÅÔÎÉÍ ÏÐÙÔÏÍ ÒÁÂÏÔÙ ÎÁ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÑÝÉÈ ÄÏÌÖÎÏÓÔÑÈ!!! õ ÷ÁÓ ÅÓÔØ ÒÅÁÌØÎÁÑ ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÏÓÔØ ÓÔÁÔØ ÂÏÌÅÅ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÍ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÑÀÝÉÍ!!! ÷Ï ×ÒÅÍÑ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÒÁÓÓÍÁÔÒÉ×ÁÀÔÓÑ ÒÅÁÌØÎÙÅ ÓÌÕÞÁÉ ÉÚ ÐÒÁËÔÉËÉ ÒÁÂÏÔÙ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔÁ É ÒÁÚÂÉÒÁÀÔÓÑ ËÏÎËÒÅÔÎÙÅ ÓÉÔÕÁÃÉÉ ÉÚ ÏÐÙÔÁ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ. ôÅÏÒÉÑ ÐÒÏÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÅÔÓÑ, ÞÅÒÅÚ ÕÐÒÁÖÎÅÎÉÑ É ÚÁÄÁÎÉÑ, É ÐÏÓÌÅ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔÙ ÒÁÚÂÉÒÁÀÔÓÑ × ÇÒÕÐÐÅ É ËÏÍÍÅÎÔÉÒÕÀÔÓÑ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔÏÍ. õ ÷ÁÓ ÅÓÔØ ÒÅÄËÁÑ É ÕÎÉËÁÌØÎÁÑ ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÏÓÔØ ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÔØ ÐÌÁÎ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÊ ÐÏ ÐÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÅ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ ËÏÎËÒÅÔÎÏ ÄÌÑ Ó×ÏÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ, ÏÂÍÅÎÑÔØÓÑ ÏÐÙÔÏÍ Ó ÄÒÕÇÉÍÉ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÑÍÉ É ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔØ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÃÉÉ × ÏÂÌÁÓÔÉ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ËÏÎÓÁÌÔÉÎÇÁ. úÁÍÏÔÉ×ÉÒÕÊÔÅ ÓÅÂÑ ÎÁ ÄÉÎÁÍÉËÕ É ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔÅ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔ!!! ðÏ ÏËÏÎÞÁÎÉÉ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÉ ÓÍÏÇÕÔ: - óÁÍÏÓÔÏÑÔÅÌØÎÏ ÐÒÏ×ÏÄÉÔØ ÒÅÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÉÚÁÃÉÀ - óÏÚÄÁ×ÁÔØ "Vision", "æÉÌÏÓÏÆÉÀ" ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÉ. - óÔÁ×ÉÔØ ÃÅÌÉ É ÒÁÚÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÔØ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÉ. - ðÒÁ×ÉÌØÎÏ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÏ×Ù×ÁÔØ ÒÁÂÏÔÕ ×ÎÕÔÒÉ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ. - ëÁÞÅÓÔ×ÅÎÎÏ ×ÎÅÄÒÑÔØ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÑ. - ðÏÌÕÞÁÔ Õ×ÅÒÅÎÎÏÓÔØ × Ó×ÏÉÈ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÑÈ ÐÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÀ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÅÊ. - éÚÂÁ×ÑÔÓÑ ÏÔ ÓÏÓÔÏÑÎÉÑ ÎÅÏÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÎÏÓÔÉ É ÓÔÒÁÈÁ. óÐÅÛÉÔÅ ÕÓÐÅÔØ (ÍÁËÓÉÍÁÌØÎÁÑ ÞÉÓÌÅÎÎÏÓÔØ ÇÒÕÐÐÙ 16 ÞÅÌÏ×ÅË)!!! óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÐÒÏÊÄÅÔ × íÏÓË×Å 1É 2 ÎÏÑÂÒÑ. òÁÓÐÉÓÁÎÉÅ ÎÁÛÉÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÉÈ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍ: 16 ÎÏÑÂÒÑ (ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÄÌÑ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ) "ðÒÁËÔÉËÁ ÒÅÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ É ÏÐÙÔ ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ" ëÁË É ÞÔÏ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÍÅÎÑÔØ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ, ËÏÇÄÁ ÜÔÏ ÎÅÏÂÈÏÄÉÍÏ ÄÅÌÁÔØ, ËÁË ×ÎÅÄÒÑÔØ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÑ. 22-23 ÎÏÑÂÒÑ (ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÄÌÑ ÍÅÎÅÄÖÅÒÏ×) "îÏ×ÙÅ ÔÅÈÎÏÌÏÇÉÉ ÐÒÏÄÁÖ É ×ÅÄÅÎÉÑ ÐÅÒÅÇÏ×ÏÒÏ×" ôÅÈÎÉËÉ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÇÏ ÏÂÝÅÎÉÑ ÐÒÉ ÒÁÂÏÔÅ Ó ËÌÉÅÎÔÏÍ, ÎÁÃÅÌÅÎÎÙÅ ÎÁ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔ - ÓÄÅÌËÁ. 7-8 ÄÅËÁÂÒÑ (ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÄÌÑ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ) "ðÒÁËÔÉËÁ ÒÅÉÎÖÉÎÉÒÉÎÇÁ ÒÏÓÓÉÊÓËÉÈ ÈÏÌÄÉÎÇÏ×" óÏÚÄÁÎÉÅ ÈÏÌÄÉÎÇÏ× É ÒÅÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÉÚÁÃÉÑ ÄÉ×ÉÚÉÏÎÁÌØÎÙÈ ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒ, ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ. ðÒÏ×ÅÄ£Í ËÏÒÐÏÒÁÔÉ×ÎÏÅ ÏÂÕÞÅÎÉÅ ÐÅÒÓÏÎÁÌ ÎÁ ÔÒÅÎÉÎÇÁÈ, ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÎÎÙÈ ÄÌÑ ÷ÁÛÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ: -ÐÒÏÄÁÖÉ -ÐÅÒÅÇÏ×ÏÒÙ -ÔÅÌÅÆÏÎÎÏÅ ÏÂÝÅÎÉÅ -ÓÅÒ×ÉÓ ÏÂÓÌÕÖÉ×ÁÎÉÑ -ÍÏÔÉ×ÁÃÉÑ îÁÛÉ ÕÓÌÕÇÉ: - òÅÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÉÚÁÃÉÑ ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÉ -æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ÏÒÇÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ -÷ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÅ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ ÎÁ ÐÒÅÄÐÒÉÑÔÉÉ -æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ËÏÒÐÏÒÁÔÉ×ÎÏÊ ËÕÌØÔÕÒÙ -ðÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÁ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ -òÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÊ -äÉÁÇÎÏÓÔÉËÁ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ -ïÐÔÉÍÉÚÁÃÉÑ ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ -òÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ ËÏÎËÕÒÅÎÔÎÙÈ ÐÒÅÉÍÕÝÅÓÔ× úÁÐÉÓÁÔØÓÑ ÎÁ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÙ É ÕÚÎÁÔØ ÂÏÌÅÅ ÐÏÄÒÏÂÎÕÀ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÀ Ï ÎÁÛÉÈ ÕÓÌÕÇÁÈ ÍÏÖÎÏ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅÆÏÎÕ (095) 933-68-98 - ËÏÎÓÁÌÔÉÎÇÏ×ÁÑ ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÑ "áòô". (ÐÒÏÓÉÍ ÷ÁÓ ÐÅÒÅÚ×ÏÎÉÔØ ÌÉÞÎÏ, ÔÁË ËÁË ÷ÁÛ ÚÁÐÒÏÓ ÐÏ ÉÎÔÅÒÎÅÔ ÍÏÖÅÔ ÎÅ ÄÏÊÔÉ) öÅÌÁÅÍ ÕÄÁÞÎÏÇÏ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ É ÖÄÅÍ ×ÓÔÒÅÞÉ Ó ÷ÁÍÉ!!! P.S. ðÒÉÎÏÓÉÍ Ó×ÏÉ ÉÚ×ÉÎÅÎÉÑ, ÚÁ ÒÅËÌÁÍÕ Ó×ÏÉÈ ÕÓÌÕÇ ÔÁËÉÍ ÓÐÏÓÏÂÏÍ Ó×ÑÚÉ! ëÁË ÐÏËÁÚÁÌ ÏÐÒÏÓ ÓÒÅÄÉ ÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÔÅÌÅÊ ÓÅÔÉ éîôåòîåô- ÜÔÏÔ ÓÐÏÓÏÂ Ó×ÑÚÉ Ó ÐÏÔÅÎÃÉÁÌØÎÙÍ ËÌÉÅÎÔÏÍ Ñ×ÌÑÅÔÓÑ ÎÁ ÄÁÎÎÙÊ ÍÏÍÅÎÔ 2-Í ÐÏÓÌÅ ÔÅÌÅ×ÉÄÅÎÉÑ ÐÏ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ. ðÏÜÔÏÍÕ, ÅÓÌÉ ÷ÁÓ ÎÅ ÚÁÉÎÔÅÒÅÓÏ×ÁÌÉ ÎÁÛÉ ÕÓÌÕÇÉ, ÔÏ ÐÒÏÓÔÏ ÕÄÁÌÉÔÅ ÜÔÏ ÐÉÓØÍÏ. éÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÑ ÒÁÓÓÙÌÁÅÔÓÑ ÏÄÉÎ ÒÁÚ É ÂÏÌØÛÅ ÐÏ×ÔÏÒÑÔÓÑ ÎÅ ÂÕÄÅÔ. óÐÁÓÉÂÏ ÚÁ ÷ÁÛÅ ÐÏÎÉÍÁÎÉÅ!!! _________________________________________________________________ ______ Íà ñòîë ðóêîâîäèòåëþ ! Íàñòàëî âðåìÿ ïîäâåñòè èòîã ðåçóëüòàòîâ è çàïëàíèðîâàòü áóäóùåé ãîä äëÿ íîâîé äåëîâîé àêòèâíîñòè!!! ñåìèíàð "ÏÐÎÐÛÂ Â ÓÏÐÀÂËÅÍÈÈ" - âîò, ÷òî ïîìîæåò... Ñåìèíàð ïðåäíàçíà÷åí äëÿ ðóêîâîäèòåëåé îðãàíèçàöèé. Îí äàåò çíàíèÿ è ìåòîäèêè ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ è âíåäðåíèÿ èçìåíåíèé, êàê è ÷òî íóæíî ìåíÿòü â îðãàíèçàöèè äëÿ óñïåøíîãî ðàçâèòèÿ. Ñåìèíàð áóäåò èíòåðåñåí â ïåðâóþ î÷åðåäü òåì, êòî ïîñòîÿííî çàäàåò ñåáå âîïðîñû: - êàê äàëüøå ðàçâèâàòü êîìïàíèþ? - ÷òî íóæíî èçìåíèòü â óïðàâëåíèè äëÿ ýôôåêòèâíîñòè áèçíåñà? - êîãäà ìîæíî ââîäèòü èçìåíåíèÿ â îðãàíèçàöèè äëÿ óëó÷øåíèÿ ñèòóàöèè? Ïðîãðàììà ñåìèíàðà ðàçðàáîòàíà íà îñíîâå îïûòà ðåôîðìèðîâàíèÿ Ðîññèéñêèõ ïðåäïðèÿòèé è âåäåò åž êîíñóëüòàíò ïî îðãàíèçàöèîííîìó ðàçâèòèþ, àâòîð ìíîãèõ ñòàòåé â îáëàñòè óïðàâëåíèÿ, ïðåïîäàâàòåëü êóðñà "Ñòðàòåãè÷åñêèé ìåíåäæìåíò" äëÿ M.B.A ÷åëîâåê ñ 5 ëåòíèì îïûòîì ðàáîòû íà ðóêîâîäÿùèõ äîëæíîñòÿõ!!! Ó Âàñ åñòü ðåàëüíàÿ âîçìîæíîñòü ñòàòü áîëåå ýôôåêòèâíûì óïðàâëÿþùèì!!! Âî âðåìÿ ñåìèíàðà ðàññìàòðèâàþòñÿ ðåàëüíûå ñëó÷àè èç ïðàêòèêè ðàáîòû êîíñóëüòàíòà è ðàçáèðàþòñÿ êîíêðåòíûå ñèòóàöèè èç îïûòà ó÷àñòíèêîâ ñåìèíàðà. Òåîðèÿ ïðîðàáàòûâàåòñÿ, ÷åðåç óïðàæíåíèÿ è çàäàíèÿ, è ïîñëå ðåçóëüòàòû ðàçáèðàþòñÿ â ãðóïïå è êîììåíòèðóþòñÿ êîíñóëüòàíòîì. Ó Âàñ åñòü ðåäêàÿ è óíèêàëüíàÿ âîçìîæíîñòü ðàçðàáîòàòü ïëàí äåéñòâèé ïî ïîñòàíîâêå ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ êîíêðåòíî äëÿ ñâîåé îðãàíèçàöèè, îáìåíÿòüñÿ îïûòîì ñ äðóãèìè ðóêîâîäèòåëÿìè è ïîëó÷èòü êîíñóëüòàöèè â îáëàñòè óïðàâëåí÷åñêîãî êîíñàëòèíãà. Çàìîòèâèðóéòå ñåáÿ íà äèíàìèêó è ïîëó÷èòå ðåçóëüòàò!!! Ïî îêîí÷àíèè ñåìèíàðà ó÷àñòíèêè ñìîãóò: - Ñàìîñòîÿòåëüíî ïðîâîäèòü ðåñòðóêòóðèçàöèþ - Ñîçäàâàòü "Vision", "Ôèëîñîôèþ" êîìïàíèè. - Ñòàâèòü öåëè è ðàçðàáàòûâàòü ñòðàòåãèè. - Ïðàâèëüíî îðãàíèçîâûâàòü ðàáîòó âíóòðè îðãàíèçàöèè. - Êà÷åñòâåííî âíåäðÿòü èçìåíåíèÿ. - Ïîëó÷àò óâåðåííîñòü â ñâîèõ äåéñòâèÿõ ïî óïðàâëåíèþ îðãàíèçàöèåé. - Èçáàâÿòñÿ îò ñîñòîÿíèÿ íåîïðåäåëåííîñòè è ñòðàõà. Ñïåøèòå óñïåòü (ìàêñèìàëüíàÿ ÷èñëåííîñòü ãðóïïû 16 ÷åëîâåê)!!! Ñåìèíàð ïðîéäåò â Ìîñêâå 1è 2 íîÿáðÿ. Ðàñïèñàíèå íàøèõ ñëåäóþùèõ ïðîãðàìì: 16 íîÿáðÿ (ñåìèíàð äëÿ ðóêîâîäèòåëåé) "Ïðàêòèêà ðåñòðóêòóðèçàöèè îðãàíèçàöèè è îïûò âíåäðåíèÿ èçìåíåíèé" Êàê è ÷òî íóæíî ìåíÿòü â îðãàíèçàöèè, êîãäà ýòî íåîáõîäèìî äåëàòü, êàê âíåäðÿòü èçìåíåíèÿ. 22-23 íîÿáðÿ (ñåìèíàð äëÿ ìåíåäæåðîâ) "Íîâûå òåõíîëîãèè ïðîäàæ è âåäåíèÿ ïåðåãîâîðîâ" Òåõíèêè ýôôåêòèâíîãî îáùåíèÿ ïðè ðàáîòå ñ êëèåíòîì, íàöåëåííûå íà ðåçóëüòàò - ñäåëêà. 7-8 äåêàáðÿ (ñåìèíàð äëÿ ðóêîâîäèòåëåé) "Ïðàêòèêà ðåèíæèíèðèíãà ðîññèéñêèõ õîëäèíãîâ" Ñîçäàíèå õîëäèíãîâ è ðåñòðóêòóðèçàöèÿ äèâèçèîíàëüíûõ ñòðóêòóð, ýôôåêòèâíûå ñòðóêòóðû óïðàâëåíèÿ. Ïðîâåäžì êîðïîðàòèâíîå îáó÷åíèå ïåðñîíàë íà òðåíèíãàõ, ðàçðàáîòàííûõ äëÿ Âàøåé îðãàíèçàöèè: -ïðîäàæè -ïåðåãîâîðû -òåëåôîííîå îáùåíèå -ñåðâèñ îáñëóæèâàíèÿ -ìîòèâàöèÿ Íàøè óñëóãè: - Ðåñòðóêòóðèçàöèÿ êîìïàíèè -Ôîðìèðîâàíèå îðãñòðóêòóðû -Âíåäðåíèå èçìåíåíèé íà ïðåäïðèÿòèè -Ôîðìèðîâàíèå êîðïîðàòèâíîé êóëüòóðû -Ïîñòàíîâêà ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ â îðãàíèçàöèè -Ðàçðàáîòêà ñòðàòåãèé -Äèàãíîñòèêà áèçíåñà -Îïòèìèçàöèÿ ñòðóêòóðû óïðàâëåíèÿ -Ðàçðàáîòêà êîíêóðåíòíûõ ïðåèìóùåñòâ Çàïèñàòüñÿ íà ñåìèíàðû è óçíàòü áîëåå ïîäðîáíóþ èíôîðìàöèþ î íàøèõ óñëóãàõ ìîæíî ïî òåëåôîíó (095) 933-68-98 - êîíñàëòèíãîâàÿ êîìïàíèÿ "ÀÐÒ". (ïðîñèì Âàñ ïåðåçâîíèòü ëè÷íî, òàê êàê Âàø çàïðîñ ïî èíòåðíåò ìîæåò íå äîéòè) Æåëàåì óäà÷íîãî áèçíåñà è æäåì âñòðå÷è ñ Âàìè!!! P.S. Ïðèíîñèì ñâîè èçâèíåíèÿ, çà ðåêëàìó ñâîèõ óñëóã òàêèì ñïîñîáîì ñâÿçè! Êàê ïîêàçàë îïðîñ ñðåäè ïîëüçîâàòåëåé ñåòè ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ- ýòîò ñïîñîá ñâÿçè ñ ïîòåíöèàëüíûì êëèåíòîì ÿâëÿåòñÿ íà äàííûé ìîìåíò 2-ì ïîñëå òåëåâèäåíèÿ ïî ýôôåêòèâíîñòè. Ïîýòîìó, åñëè Âàñ íå çàèíòåðåñîâàëè íàøè óñëóãè, òî ïðîñòî óäàëèòå ýòî ïèñüìî. Èíôîðìàöèÿ ðàññûëàåòñÿ îäèí ðàç è áîëüøå ïîâòîðÿòñÿ íå áóäåò. Ñïàñèáî çà Âàøå ïîíèìàíèå!!!

1 0

Cryptography and the Present Crisis
by Nomen Nescio 28 Oct '01

28 Oct '01

Cypherpunks are forgetting everything they are supposed to know. Does anyone remember why this list was formed? Does the "cypher" in cypherpunk mean anything? Has anyone considered whether there is a role for crypto technology in the face of the current threats to civil rights? These new laws are a perfect opportunity to promote the message of cryptography for privacy. Virtually all of the provisions which have cypherpunks wailing in despair can be easily circumvented by the use of crypto technology. And every trial balloon floated to limit or ban crypto has been shot down instantly, so full of holes that it will never fly. Carnivore will be deployed to snoop on email? Simple, use PGP/GPG. Carnivore used for "trap and trace" address gathering? Simple, use remailers to disguise the patterns of who you are communicating with. Legitimate criticism of U.S. government potentially interpreted as supporting terrorism? Simple, make your points anonymously or pseudonymously and be free from the fear of prosecution. Every one of these policies is an opportunity, not a threat. To the extent that these crackdowns engender concern about privacy violations from a growing segment of the population, this is a chance for cypherpunks to spread their knowledge and their technology. You don't have to be a paranoid any more to be afraid that the government is spying on you. John Ashcroft himself boasts that Big Government will be watching. Cypherpunks should be taking advantage of this opportunity to promote their message of privacy through technology. For the first time since the group was formed, they can make a legitimate case that the threat of government surveillance is increasing. With the Bill of Rights being tossed out the window and the AG openly admitting to bending the rules to achieve his goals, a wide community is going to be receptive to this message. Of course there are presently substantial numbers who are caught up in the collectivist urge and who might view attempts to protect privacy as unpatriotic. But this is a temporary phenomenon, already fading. The flags which flew from every car and building in sight a few weeks ago are disappearing. Yet the Draconian new regulations will not go away. Inevitably there will be a growing segment of the population which sees the government as a fearsome threat. It is time for cypherpunks to go back to their roots. Let us put the cypher back in cypherpunk. There are other places where people can whine about how evil congress is or fantasize about secession from the U.S. Focus on crypto and what role it can play in the current crisis. Believe it or not, no one else is doing that. No one in the world is speaking out to say, here are tools which can circumvent the government's efforts to take away our privacy. If the cypherpunks don't do it, no one will.

1 0

Soothe or alarm: What is "weaponized" anthrax?
by Karsten M. Self 28 Oct '01

28 Oct '01

I posted on this question Oct 21, saying: [Rep Frist's (R-TN) comment] leads one to question the descriptions of anthrax as "weaponized" and "non-weaponized", particularly as there are several dimensions of weaponization. The lesser is spore size, with 5 micron being the preferred form for inducing inhalation anthrax. The greater is antibiotic resistance, and it appears that this is the criterion on which statements of "non-weaponized anthrax" are being made. Truth seems to be that resistance is secondary to spore size given the difficulty of treating advanced cases of inhalation anthrax. My suggestion to the press would be to disaggregate the term "weaponized" to its components: inhalable, and antibiotic resistant. This provides the public with more useful information: the bacterium is or is not a grave infection threat (inhalable), and the bacterium is or is not treatable (resistant). This is actionable information: inhalable, but nonresistant, anthrax means that individuals should be aware of respiratory illness symptoms and submit for early diagnosis and/or treatment. Today's SF Chronicle reports: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/10/28/MN188786.DTL… ype=printable When it comes to describing anthrax, it is as if they are speaking different languages. "Weapons-grade material," Gephardt, the House Democratic leader from Missouri, told reporters this week, describing the potency of the anthrax in a letter opened in Daschle's office. "Common variety," Senate Majority Leader Daschle from South Dakota said of the same white powder. Scientists say both are right. The material was weapons grade, in the sense that it was finely milled and aerosolized to make it easier to infiltrate a victim's lungs. At the same time, it was a common variety that was not genetically altered, making it fully treatable with common antibiotics. So which statement is more responsible? [...] "I don't think 'weaponized' has any medical or scientific value," [Ridge] explained late this week. "It seems to have different meanings . . . to different people." The discrepancy in labeling the potency of the poison is a perfect illustration of the challenges confronting authorities as they try to communicate complex, evolving and grim information on live television, often on an hourly basis. The failure to use precise language can have fatal consequences. On Oct. 18, three days after Daschle's letter was opened, Postmaster General John Potter invited the press into a mail facility in southeast Washington, and told the assembled reporters and workers that "there is only a minute chance" that anthrax spores could have escaped from envelopes and harmed postal workers. Today, Potter is on a 60-day dose of antibiotics. So are the reporters and anyone else who attended the news conference, including Washington, D.C., Mayor Anthony Williams and his 80-year-old mother. Two workers at the facility have since died. Authorities knew at the time that the refined spores were highly potent, but based on previous experience in New Jersey and Florida, had no reason to believe they would contaminate the Washington mail house. And they wanted to calm anxious postal workers. "The administration has been forthright in making information known as soon as information is available," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. "It is the nature of this type of attack involving anthrax that information develops over time." Nevertheless, there is frustration from those who feel that soft words intended to soothe might instead lull people into a false sense of complacency. "I think we've got to stop parsing words and trying to be anything other than accurate about what this is," Gephardt said of the biological attack on the Capitol. "This is highly sophisticated material. It is small in size and it aerosolizes, and so you've got to be careful in the way it can be handled. "I believe people are smart. If you arm them (people) with accurate information, you have a better chance of preventing successful attacks," Gephardt said. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself(a)ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

1 0

Huge Market Potential & Demand
by sdhomebiz＠yahoo.com 28 Oct '01

28 Oct '01

1 0