- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Stay Motion Handled 1-5
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We're banging away on the 20 Stay Motion images, up to page 5 of the USA's Ex Parte, will continue, and send along the pack when done. Not to head off anyone who wants to start at the back and MITM.

1 0

Re: Confirmation on Diana, please?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bubba Rom Dos wrote: ... > Count the number of times you hear the press unwittingly mention that > she died just when her life was coming together and her star was rising. > When you are done counting, that is the number of reasons for why she > had to die. Think about it. > > ~~ > Bubba > ~~ Loose-cannon Diana became dead Saint Diana ala J.F.K. "What a wonderful person she is, now that she's gone." Why do the nefarious, omniprescent 'they' (TM) always announce the death by heart attack so many hours after rushing the target to the hospital? Does it have to do with airline schedules? Any reports of a second driver on the grassy knoll? Any guesses as to when the crash surviver bites it? !Bubba

1 0

Mutual Funds - The Real Deal
by MutualFunds＠funds.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Friend: NOW, AN EXCITING MLM OPPORTUNITY IS HERE...MUTUAL FUND$ & BABY BOOMER$ - A PERFECT MLM MARRIAGE!!! The bull market of the past 15 years is still roaring on with stocks proving again why they are historically the premier investment choice of savvy investors. Mutual Funds are the vehicles to invest in with diversified investment risk for the underlying individual stocks which have been on a steady climb upward since the early '80s. FACTS ON MUTUAL FUNDS - Mutual Funds manage about $2.8 Trillion - 31% of U.S. households invest in Mutual Funds - There are over 5,500 different Mutual Funds BENEFITS OF MUTUAL FUNDS - LOWER INVESTOR RISK - due to diversification of portfolios by buying many different securities. - EASY ACCESS TO YOUR MONEY - Mutual Funds mean LIQUIDITY, i.e. you can buy & sell your investment shares on any business day. - PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT - skilled & experienced investment professionals invest your money by tracking markets & trends to identify opportunities. This allows investors to minimize their monitoring & follow-up. - NO LOAD/LOW LOAD FEE - Mutual Funds have either no broker's fees or very low fees which are very attractive especially with frequent transactions. - BEAUTY OF COMPOUNDING - e.g. a 15% return over 5 years then investors get their principal investment back with the beauty of compounding on reinvested dividends. TARGET MARKET - BABY BOOMERS The most powerful block of consumers are the baby boomers (those born between 1946-64 with current age range of 33-51). The sheer power and financial clout of this group cannot be overstated! Boomers are dictating changes in technology, consumer products, style preferences, tastes, etc. All across the spectrum in the U.S. Madison Avenue has known this for years and has exploited it in exponential fashion. Television advertisers and direct mail catalogue companies recognize the power of this group. Ever notice how the models and actors are starting to look a little older, a bit grayer? Ever notice how aging rock and roll stars such as Mick Jagger, Rod Stewart, Neil Young, Tina Turner, Bonnie Raitt, etc. are still wildly popular? Why? Because the group that grew up with these stars has such huge clout in the marketplace - The Baby Boomers! Aging Boomers are the primary target for investments such as Mutual Funds because they have the "need" for investments as they age and the "discretionary income" to make these investments. The strong need for Mutual Funds is driven by other factors as well: the sudden collective realization by this voracious group of consumer products purchasers and credit card users that there "are" financial limits (even for them) and that now is the time to exercise financial prudence and discipline. With the long-term viability of Social Security in doubt, retirement concerns are starting to mount. This is especially acute with the continual increases in life expectancy for both sexes. College education costs for their kids are a big concern as well. The vast majority of Boomers are computer owners and they are a significant percentage of online subscribers. They have the need for Mutual Fund investments, the discretionary income and now the newfound desire to invest in their futures. The TIMING COULDN'T BE BETTER FOR THIS MLM OPPORTUNITY!!! Mutual Funds and Baby Boomers are now, and will continue to be, joined at the hip right through the Millennium and beyond! HOW CAN YOU GET INVOLVED? We will provide you with four (4) reports that will help the investor get ready for his/her Mutual Funds investments by setting financial goals, tips to help manage debt, analyze spending habits, patterns (1st Report). The second Report will help explain Mutual Funds with emphasis on professional management, portfolio diversification, etc. The third Report will look at investment needs and goals and help lead the investor to the proper investment choice at this stage of his/her life. Finally, the fourth Report will provide useful tips and information on Asset Allocation and determining what mix of funds are best suited for your financial needs and goals. These Reports cost $5.00 each. Your total investment is $20.00 with a vast market of baby boomers to target. This is a fresh program being marketed on the Internet. It has vast potential because of the size of the target group, the group's "deep pockets" plus the investment and long-term security needs of the target group. Your marketing letter can combine the advantages of Mutual Funds as an investment vehicle with the benefits and needs of the target group. The four (4) Reports are educational, informative and an excellent first step to a cohesive, disciplined and systematic investment program. INSTRUCTIONS STEP 1- ORDER all four REPORTS listed by Name and Number. For each Report, send $5.00 CASH and a self-addressed stamped envelope to the person listed with the Report. You will need all 4 Reports because you will be Reprinting and Reselling them. International orders should be sent with $6.00 CASH. ($1.00 is for the extra postage). STEP 2 - Replace the Name & Number under Report number 1 with yours, moving the one that was there down to Report # 2. Name & Address for #2 is moved to Report # 3 and name & address of #3 is moved to Report # 4. The # and address of #4 is then dropped from the list. STEP 3 - Email a copy of the entire program to Anyone & Everyone. You can get email addresses from companies on the Internet for very reasonable prices. REPORTS *****ORDER EACH REPORT BY NUMBER AND NAME***** ALWAYS SEND A SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE AND $5.00 CASH (INTERNATIONAL - $6.00 CASH) FOR EACH ORDER REQUESTING THE SPECIAL REPORT BY NAME AND NUMBER REPORT # 1 - GETTING READY FOR INVESTING 1) Benzer Productions 14341 Inglewood Ave., #183 Hawthorne, CA 90250 REPORT # 2 - MUTUAL FUNDS - WHAT & WHY 2) Signature 369 Montezuma Ave., STE 351 Santa Fe, NM 87501 REPORT # 3 - DETERMINING YOUR NEEDS & GOALS 3) Benzer Productions 14341 Inglewood Ave., #183 Hawthorne, CA 90250 REPORT # 4 - ASSET ALLOCATION 4) Signature 369 Montezuma Ave., STE 351 Santa Fe, NM 87501 CONCLUSION This program is brand new. NOW is the time to get in on the ground floor of an opportunity that will prove to be financially rewarding beyond your dreams!!! With MLM gaining more and more acceptance, this program will have a long run because it makes sense and the product (Mutual Funds) and the target group (Baby Boomers) are going to be around a long, long time!!! BEST WISHES WITH THE PROGRAM AND GOOD LUCK!

1 0

Stay Motion Handled, All Pages
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We've completed keying in the 20 Stay Motion images, and are formatting and proofreading. Will send along when ready.

1 0

patel pages 10,11,20,23 done
by miner 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Stay Pages Finished
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The 20 images of the Stay have been digitized and formatted: http://jya.com/bernstein-stay.htm Thanks again to Dan, the Bernstein primary team and EFF.

1 0

Top 10 Ways to Make a Grouchy Old CypherPunk Smile - #7
by janke＠unixg.ubc.ca 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Top 10 Ways to Make a Grouchy Old CypherPunk Smile -------------------------------------------------- #10) Find his shoes for him. #9) Buy Kent Crispin a Dr. Kevorkian gift-certificate. #8) Nuke Washington DC #7) Send ten copies of this back to Vulis. #6) #5) #4) #3) #2) #1) [This space reserved for T.C. May]

1 0

Developments in the _Junger_ suit
by Peter D. Junger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Now that Judge Patel has declared again in the _Bernstein_ case that cryptographic software is entitled to the full protection of the First Amendment, it is time for me to bring you up to date on some developments on the Cleveland front. To assist in the preparation of an amended complaint in my suit that, like _Bernstein_, seeks to enjoin the enforcement of the export regulations restricting publication of encryption software, my Legal Attack Team on June 12 submitted several ``classification requests'' to the Department of Commerce in an effort to determine exactly what is, and what is not, covered by the definition of encryption software set out in the Export Administration Regulations. The Bureau of Export Aministration in the Department of Commerce responded to these requests on or about July 4 and amplified their response on or about August 7. That response, though not generally very helpful, did contain a number of surprises. In particular, two versions of a one-time pad encryption program using the XOR function that I wrote in 8086 assembly language and machine code and a similar OTP program written by Paul Leyland in one line of C, were classified as EAR 99, which means that those programs are ``not subject to the licensing restrictions for encryption software''. No explanation was given as to why these programs implementing the one unbreakable form of encryption are not classified as encryption programs subject to ECCN 5D002. More importantly, the classification requests included several pages of HTML links to strong, unexportable encryption programs on several FTP servers outside of the United States, but the Bureau of Export Administration said that they were unable to classify that material, and instead supplied us with an advisory opinion with respect to that request saying: ``Professor Junger's activity is not an export that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).'' The Bureau subsequently amplified this response, saying: ``While the use of html links by a person might, in some applications, involve an export . . . we reiterate that the activity described by your submission is not an export activity that is subject to the EAR and would also not constitute conduct prohibited by Section 744.9 of the EAR.'' The Bureau did, however, classify several programs that we submitted, including one written by me in C that implements several different encryption algorithms and Adam Back's RSA program in three lines of Perl (which is available at <http:/www.dcs.ex.ac.uk>), as being encryption programs that are subject to the export restriction of the EAR. The most significant part of the Bureau's response, however, was their professed inability to classify one way or the other all programs implementing certain specified encryption algorithms such as, for example, OTP programs that XOR the bytes comprising the message with the bytes in a one-time pad. The Bureau said as to this request: ``BXA cannot provide a single classification opinion for any encryption product that `implemements' a certain algorithm''. Due to the kindness of John Young, our requests for classification and BXA's responses will be available shortly at <http://www.jya.com/>. The links to cryptographic programs on FTP sites outside the United States are already available at <http://samsara.law.cwru.edu/links/cryptolinks.html>. Stay tuned for further announcements once this labor day weekend is past. -- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH EMAIL: junger(a)samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu NOTE: junger(a)pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists

2 1

Re: Confirmation on Diana, please?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Personally, I have to say that if *I* got a reply to an anonymous post before it had even reached its destination, I would start to worry... > bureau42 Anonymous Remailer wrote: > > > > Are there any Cypherpunks mailing list members who can confirm that > > there was a series of posts related to Princess Diana's death in the > > days before the event? I am particularly interested in information as > > to whether Cypherpunks were in any way responsible for a slight delay > > in the timing of her death. > > I am particularly interested in communicating with the person who sent > > me the anonymous messages between 8/24/97 and 8/30/97 using the nym > > "A'Tak A'Tdorn'. > > > > If you have information and an interest in sharing it, please send a > > post to the Cypherpunks list or the fight-censorship list, indicating > > such. If you wish for me to contact you through a neutral, third party, > > indicate that as well. > > > > Thank You > > If you have a death-wish, then send this message again through the > Canadian Mountie remailer. {:>)-----< > {HELP! They knocked me down and cut off my arms!} > > I presume the message you are referring to on 24/8/97 is the one > which answers your previous anonymous inquiry by saying, > "Only for the moment we are saying nothing." > It meant what it said. However, since the moment is over I suppose > there is no harm in saying "something." I will therefore give you > a modicum of information on the messages which have passed through > the cypherpunks list since your original notification that something > was in the wind. > For starters, although I have not seen the original email which you > received but I believe that if you read it closely you will see that > it implied that the coming messages to the list would be in a form > which was _analogous_ to the event, whereas you seemed to take it > literally as a plan to "Nuke D.C." > [How you managed to come to the conclusion that spooks and shadows > would refer to a coming event directly totally escapes me!?!] > If you will reinterpret the posts in question in light of the event, > I believe you will see the thread that winds through them. > > As you were told, the AOL'er messages were used as markers to divine > which of the coming messages contained stegonographic messages of one > sort or another, or pointers to graphics containing the stegonography. > I am assuming you understood this and sent the AOL'er message saying, > "Please send more details...thanks" > > If you had not taken the phrase "Nuke D.C." so literally you would > have noticed that the "Fade to Gray" post linked the coming major > event (Nuke D.C.) to foreigners, automobiles and death. > You were not alone in your request for details regarding the message > in the Quote of the day: > "I know the day it happens. On August 29, 1997 it's going > to feel pretty fucking real to you too." > which had been sent by one of the Canadians involved in ferreting out > the details of the coming event. > One of the cypherpunk list members posted the question, "When is X-Day > supposed to be?" when there was no mention of 'X-Day' in the quote. This > understandably led to postponement of the event while those involved > checked to see if there had been a breach in their security. > The subsequent message which stated, "I don't know what you mean by > 'When is X-Day supposed to be?'" was interpreted by those involved to > indicate that full details of their plans remained a mystery to those > who were trying to expose and stop it. > After they had put things in motion to proceed with their backup plan, > however, two more messages came to the list which indicated that there > was more known about their plan than they had suspected. > > In reply to the post expressing lack of knowledge about the timing of > X-Day, a post from _lne.com_ (surprise, surprise) suggested that X-Day > referred to people who are going to be "taken from the earth" (death) > by "pleasure saucers" (limosene) and noting that the limosene would > be operated by "Greys" (a reference to the <fade to grey> ending of > the "Fade To Gray" post--indicating a spook/LEA connection). The post > ended by suggesting the time of the event might be "April" (4 o'clock) > and gave a pointer to a sight with a graphic stego which would provide > a visual message. > > The second post that came well after it had been decided to proceed > with the backup plan said, > "The metallic custard scent ripped through the > stegosaurus' nostrils." > (metallic custard being a car bomb--note eye witness > accounts by Michael Solomon {who just happened to be > on the scene, naturally} speaking of a "loud explosion" > that brought to mind "terrorists."} > > "Clearly the meonotreme (Monarchist/Anarchist/Extremist) > journey it would begin as it had ended." > (The Fairy Tale Princess who had embarked on an extremist > political journey was about to return to becoming the > {dead} Fairy Tale Princess, once again.) > > "The ponder-tree hung itself in the heavy air, > it's sap becomming purple." > (Diana had sealed her death {"hung itself"} when she > opted to bond herself to Royal blood.) > > "And flowed enigmatically > like a river of broken curves and powdered eggshells." > (A reference to the immediate area of the planned event, > which would be at the split {"broken"} of a tunnel road > {"river"} and the airbags being sabotaged.) > > After this post appeared on the cypherpunks list, a Timmy C. Mayflower > ASCII art spam showed up on the list from a juno remailer, but it had > a Timothy C. May .sig following the artwork. (Followed by the proverbial > GJBuller response.) > Then both the juno remailer and the toad list experienced problems with > multiple messages being sent to _some_ people and _not_ others, as well > as _some_ people not getting certain messages at all. > You will also note that, as the "Fade To Gray" post indicated (re: all > the cypherpunks being "out of town" at the time of the event), there was > no activity on the list in the time surrounding the event. > As for the information in the graphic pointed to by the lne.com post, > it was never considered to be anything but an attempt at intentional > misdirection. > > You were told months ago that Diana's current power came from the > failure of the so-called suicide attempt and that the agreement to > leave her free to continue her public activities was contingent upon > her remaing free from political matters. You were also informed that > her involvement with the Labor Party land-mine issue was a breach of > that agreement, as was her June 13th reference to the resistance of > the Conservative party in this regard. > When you were contacted last week, you should have been able to figure > out for yourself what her link to the Harrods clan indicated. You were > made aware of everything you needed to be sitting on top of the story. > Given the fact that you have shown so little ability to act on the > information you have already been given, we are probably wasting our > time by giving you any further information. Regardless, if you wish to > pursue the matter then I suggest that you research: > a) the explosion > b) the driver's airbag > c) the liquid on the ground at the scene > d) the source of changes in the day's schedule > and/or the previous day's schedule > e) the details of who was involved in the arrest > {debriefing} of the photographers present > > If you _do_ manage to follow up on the information then we _might_ be > inclined to give you the details of Prince Charle's upcoming wedding > and coronation. > > : : B o o t s > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Re: Confirmation on Diana, please?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Fuck Diana and Dodi, rotting garbage, germs, well ridded, like JFK. Up the paparazzi or whoever honored Labor Day doing dirty work, giving a lesson: run, can't hide. Two down, thousands more to go worldwide, the sooner the better, inshallah, scare the beasts back to bunker. Guards will drain their blood, day by day. Grieve for the driver, maybe the royal bitch's cop, praise Oswald or whoever.

1 0