December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a 'Dumb Cunt' and told to 'Go Fuck Yourself' at all costs, by TruthMonger
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

TruthMonger wrote: > Thanks for replying to my email. It's the first one I ever got. > Everyone else just ignores me. Go figure... Theory #1 TruthMonger's true identity is the ventriloquist dummy from 'Soap'. Theory #2 Those strange sounds you hear when lying quietly in bed at night? They are the sound of people slapping their foreheads when they realize they are arguing with a dummy. (;>} A. Dummy II

1 0

Funding Cypherpunks Action Projects
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I have worked out a plan whereby we can auction off the role of Cypherpunks Chief Spokesperson in order to fund CAP's. The idea for a Spokesperson pyramid scheme came to me after realizing that the list has not only a variety of individuals competing as the chief list 'Fed baiters', but also quite a number of people who enjoy 'Christian baiting', as well: TruthMonger, playing with his private parts, wrote: > Why does it not come as a surprise that this Dumb Cunt Nazi Christian > Bitch (TM) is hiding behind 'the children,' hoping that it will prevent > her from being a target of reprisal for the bullshit she is flinging > at others? > Why doesn't someone shoot this Dumb Cunt Nazi Christian Bitch? > If it saves the life of just one child... Eric Cordian spit out: > "Puritanism" might be defined as the fear that someone, somewhere, is > having a porn-induced orgasm. Stable people tend to worry about their > own orgasms, and not their neighbors. Perhaps if you had a few > orgasms yourself, you might lose interest in the orgasms of others. > [Nonsense Deleted] > Please bite my enormous throbbing love sausage with an ice cube in your > mouth. Jesus Christ wrote: > If you will check the Biblical Archives, I think you will find > that Peter never really fooled anyone, either. > {Speaking of which, do you also plan to censor the parts of the > Bible which quote my use of the word, "cock?"} There is no telling how much money we could raise by appealing to the macho male egos on the list who lock horns in CypherPissing cock-size wars, if we were to take bids on the honor of being the Cypherpunks' authorized 'Fed-baiter' or 'Christian-pisser', etc. Given the wide variety of individuals, groups, organizations, corporations, government agencies, etc., which have been the target of vicious attacks on this list, there is no end of the number of CypherPisser Ambassadorships we could invent to fill the Cypherpunks Action Projects coffers. Cypherpunks Chief MLM Spokesman

1 0

Re: www.cypherpunks.to
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Lucky Green wrote: > > What happened to www.cypherpunks.to? It appears to have disappeared. > > The server works fine and I can reach it from the US. I tried www.cypherpunks.to and couldn't get connected. I dropped the www and got sent to the www site. And the root password there is...

2 1

No Subject
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Igor Chudov @ home spoke: > > This Jodi Hoffman is most likely laughing at you all > after baiting you so successfully. > > I refuse to believe that she could have been so dumb to write > what she wrote, seriously. Believe it, Igor. There's a large number of people in the country who believe as she does, though perhaps not too many of them have the chutzpah to post such opinions to the fight-censorship list (where it could certainly be interpreted as a troll). Let's face it, there're a lot of people in the US who'd be happier if they were governed like China or Singapore; they want a stern authoritarian voice keeping society 'decent' and the homosexuals and other 'perverts' under control and out of sight, regulating what you can read and watch on TV, and what gets taught in schools, regulating what you can smoke and drink and sniff, and indoctrinating children into and enforcing the rules of the locally preferred religion. While they may pay lip service to it, they care little for the first amendment (except as it assures //them// the right to express //their// views or practice //their// religion). Sure, they'll wave the flag and mouth the words 'Constitution' and 'Bill of Rights', but their solution to every disagreement is 'put them in jail' or 'pass another law'. Frondeur -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNF9fllqnO6WRZ1UEEQKiSgCfQpuXZmx3Ry+GHKE83zzR3do11sUAoKzT ldtqH9pCnLO9QRrAoGaEfPGj =LOUx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 mQGiBDQn15YRBADp/iepGjB1hBoGgkKI+g4kHRtBQfpeR9BfwQP3E/GA+82SnLk+ BVExZEXaqgqq4cu3j89auJd+rSi++PpAuV03DpLfdTCdLQDrExEd63w0BYeM4g7L B7TA4LfSHgAuKwwtNPkgCfj7eWE34XOWTIbxnkQqMJyDLjzOUm/8LVHADQCg/8uo JZ1FmULWIhscEE1upL61+9kD/0zFqguqDrey8XHxRJeYom/UpEVV4gCJwkYrrew8 SKjtrUEHVA7la2TntCdXSQR5IrF5AWiamChxbCWdZE1F5bLl7xQgGrEJNNDk23Py L8ihmOYZk03rKYlaeUCxADKlI9hcWlGpsJnF6XRqjMltwfEe9S+zrsBRFQw3A7WR 4xwXA/9MiD+r0+ClUzJ1fC9dMJNDQQZQYdS0aiuh463cT3GI/CHJ34UD9ptmBLtQ ZEn0O0vK8eWSkw7vmrbqUekxgpl+B7tytuDKWHPUUgryblC0s986YSpnyeGZ0nt9 anzqKDqMOP3e1YVf8qJpZRPgzKl1KSncCGZ7CdVGgVxdl125vbQcRnJvbmRldXIg PGZyb25kZXVyQGRldi5udWxsPokASwQQEQIACwUCNCfXlgQLAwECAAoJEFqnO6WR Z1UE0rMAnRl8SRsYyH+IXH4yB3CzeF91V8J7AJ9Pk6oR9kFKbyUZyDIpbLkVC62F bbkCDQQ0J9eWEAgA9kJXtwh/CBdyorrWqULzBej5UxE5T7bxbrlLOCDaAadWoxTp j0BV89AHxstDqZSt90xkhkn4DIO9ZekX1KHTUPj1WV/cdlJPPT2N286Z4VeSWc39 uK50T8X8dryDxUcwYc58yWb/Ffm7/ZFexwGq01uejaClcjrUGvC/RgBYK+X0iP1Y TknbzSC0neSRBzZrM2w4DUUdD3yIsxx8Wy2O9vPJI8BD8KVbGI2Ou1WMuF040zT9 fBdXQ6MdGGzeMyEstSr/POGxKUAYEY18hKcKctaGxAMZyAcpesqVDNmWn6vQClCb AkbTCD1mpF1Bn5x8vYlLIhkmuquiXsNV6TILOwACAgf/fc9Mli0WztsQDfF/Itxp IiQzM5mvFq00BwHGvoKTdU+c8FWz3ZS0yzqpIwPp4wEvMLEC6xfTrGJzOxtdH4wO MHjHPVrykbc/6HkF9L10soea6Lc6/Ar93yIC+IpPmkcchPxKkYN+VEWGv97otWpS QwMHtMImUaPJ69jtn/oBtKjc9SlIy5ib5eIhchp1vEC75P4EwlPgOWXsGZA9IR63 0W8im1gNv8W9Egd1RCPFEt/UG7mpAjg7/SekUsOKksRWuC5MOEH1fSvVBIYjoMxG EYNMF632rxmhkC8bPKUeIuhpXJzHaqaE8yFA4YKw0K2TuQ/mHZ1L4KqPWH52h4Sc OokAPwMFGDQn15ZapzulkWdVBBECzMYAnA+Lv3zZm8Ptc7nPB2yz2FVFsL2JAJ4w v64l2UxSDvLRRZDDZY3B2LhJTw== =/z57 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

Jodi Hoffman: Homophobe!!!!!!!!
by Ross Wright 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: http://199.227.69.135/ramp/aletter.html You might wish to add that most "homosexual" suicides are probably normal kids who have been seduced into an abnormal lifestyle encouraged by our schools and culture; or at the very least, they were probably suffering under the weight of excessive sexual harassment, in the form of our current crop of pathological sex-education programs. =-=-=-=-=-=- Ross Wright King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services http://ross.adnetsol.com Voice: (408) 259-2795

6 6

[ON TOPIC] Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Paul Spirito wrote: > >Alexander Tyler wrote: > >> "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only > >> exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves > >> largess out of the public treasury." > This assumes there is a "majority of voters". Read James Madison, & kiss a > multiculturalist today. > Now can we get back to denouncing Jewish Nazis? Sorry, that's off-topic. You _can_, however, discuss 'Remailer Hating Nazis'...

1 0

PGP 5.0: Keyservers
by lcs Mixmaster Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Out of curiosity, what protection is there for PGP 5.x users submitting keys to the keyservers? Would it not be trivial for somebody to see what dialup SLIP link a key is coming from and tie that key to the person submitting it? That isn't a problem for personal keys, but it is a big problem for psuedonyms. Is there some kind of mechanism in place for submitting such keys via anonymous remailers? This might already have been covered by other Cypherpunks or the PGP folks. ParanoiaMonger

2 1

Re: Terrorism is a NON-THREAT (fwd)
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

snow wrote: > Part of the problem is that people _assume_ that legislation fixes > problems. It doesn't. Laws just give society permission to punish the > offender. Prosecutor: "You should find this nanny guilty of murder because young people like to party." Jury: "Duuhhh...OK!" What I find ironically hilarious, offensive and sad, is that there are still so many new laws being passed, in spite of the fact that they are no longer really needed. Courtrooms now pretty much just serve as an arena for engaging in the age-old sport of public stoning. Whoever does the best job of finger pointing, while working the crowd into a frenzy, wins. Tim McVeigh was Dead Meat (TM) the minute the judge ruled that fingers in the courtroom could only be pointed at Terrible Timmy. I guess I'm an old fart...I remember when $15 million could buy you a decent attorney. I don't own any guns, so I guess when the Feds kick my door in, I'll just point at the dog, and hope they go for my clever ruse. Hell, I'm even willing to testify... Not-Me!

1 0

Cypherpunks Physical Meetings...The Rest of the Story
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From News of the CypherPunks: * In March, a 36-year-old man choked to death on a 6-inch tropical fish he had popped into his mouth while showing off for friends in Bayou Vista, La. And in April, a 12-year-old boy was electrocuted in East Palo Alto, Calif., after he climbed a high-voltage transmission tower in the rain, dared his three companions to join him, and then accidentally touched a wire. And in July, a 22-year- old man, described by his grandmother as "smart in school," died in a bungee-cord accident on a railroad trestle in Fairfax County, Va. (Said a police spokesman: "The length of the cord that he had assembled was greater than the distance between the trestle and the ground.")

1 0

Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman
by Abstruse 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Someone on this list, I forget who, has made numerous attempts at > convincing us that pornography 'does no harm' to children. It is > exactly at this point that I must draw a line. Studies have shown that > an event which lasts even so much as three-tenths of a second, within > five to ten minutes has produced a structural change in the brain. > Exposure to porn causes actual brain damage, especially in a child. let me guess . . . scientology? it sounds to me as if you just despise porn so much that you're seeing red, and hence . . . not seeing the facts straight (or believing whatever you [want to] hear).

1 0