December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: DARPA Hires NetAss/TIS TO Develop Secure DNS
by Marshall Clow 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>This is somewhat tacky. SecureDNS exists, and TIS got export approval >a while back to publish a "bones" version, minus encryption routines. >John Gilmore and his lawyer decided that, since it only does authentication, >not message encryption, it should be ok to publish _with_ the crypto >algorithms, and it's been quietly sitting on his web pages. >Recently the Feds sent him a letter saying "Oh, no, we didn't mean >it was OK to publish/export this encryption-based authentication system >just because the law says you can, so stop it".... >Now they're paying for another version. Are they going to try something >DSS-based instead of RSA, just so you don't need encryption-capable >crypto with it, or is this going to be another scam? >Or is it just different parts of the Feds not talking to each other? > Delay is the deadliest form of denial. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Adobe Systems <mailto:mclow@mailhost2.csusm.edu> "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." --Thomas Jefferson

1 0

Re: radio net
by Mixmaster 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Robert Hettinga wrote: > > Hey, guys, > > Someone here already said it, but nobody else got it, so I'll repeat it: > SSB, or Single Sideband. It's commercial ham radio, if you will, and all > the ships use it. I expect that you can shove anything down an SSB set that > you want, including encrypted traffic. > > Ham radio is a government nerd subsidy, and as such, doesn't do much but > make more government funded/sactioned/approved/whatever nerds. :-). > > SSB would do just fine. It's an international standard, after all, and > probably not under the control of any one government, even.e Do you need a license for that one? Can someone explain what exactly the sidebands are? It rings a bell and I used to know, but it's been around 15 years since I played with this kind of thing. It's just under the surface of my brain, but I just can't place it.

1 0

CLINTON SPECIAL ISSUE: The Oval Orifice/Clinton Sex Therapy/Multi-taskwinsky
by STUFFED NEWS DAILY 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We're having an impeachy time digging up the dirt and bringing you all the latest stories from Bubbagate! And in case you missed our erection coverage yesterday don't forget to check it out after you've read today's issue. GIVE THAT MAN A CIGAR! IN TODAY'S ISSUE: 30 NEW EXTRA HOT JPEGS! 5 NEW SIZZLING STORIES NIPPLED SALES MULTI-TASKWINSKY HOW TO KISS YOUR BABE GOOD-BYE THE BEST OF EUREKA! MASO-CASTING CALL CLINTON SEX THERAPY NICOLE KIDMAN'S TITS GRANNY PORN THE OVAL ORIFICE MUCH MORE! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/17/ <---- Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL above. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the URL, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/17/ <----

1 0

Predictions: Crime and Criminal Justice in the 21st Century
by User of DOOM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Predictions: Crime and Criminal Justice in the 21st Century 1. The United States will experience a significant economic recession/crisis very close to the turn of the Century. 2. As the large pool of young people born in the early 1990s become teenagers and young adults, there will be a dramatic increase in violent crime around the year 2005-2010. 3. America will experience sporadic civil disorders/riots in many of its urban areas during the next 10-15 years -- much of it related to racial/ethnic problems. 4. Terrorist acts by "fringe"/special issue groups will increase at a significant rate -- becoming a major law enforcement and security problem. 5. As faith in the criminal justice system declines, there will be a rise in vigilante-based incidents where citizens take the enforcement of crime problems into their own hands. 6. Much of middle- and upper-class America will take a "retreatist" attitude and move into private high-security communities located in suburban or rural areas. Because of technological advances, many companies and corporations will also move out of the urban environments as well. 7. Due to many of the predictions listed above, much of law enforcement and security in the 21st Century will become privatized and contractual. Traditional law enforcement agencies will primarily serve urban and rural communities. 8. Law enforcement will evolve into two major and divergent roles: traditional law enforcement and a more specialized military tactical role to deal with the growing urban violance and terrorist incidents. 9. Significant violence and unrest will plague our nation's prisons. Major prison riots will become a regular occurrence. 10. With the decrease of the possibility of major global warfare, the United States military will take on an increased domestic "peace-keeping" role with America's law enforcement agencies. John Young wrote: > > Tim asks: > > >Freeh and Company continue to mumble about "meeting > >the legitmate needs of law enforcement." What can they > >be speaking of? > ... > >Obviously his side is contemplating domestic crypto restrictions. > > Threat of terrorism will be the impetus for applying national security > restrictions domestically, for relaxing cold war limitations on spying > on Americans, for dissolving barriers between law enforcement > and military/intelligence agencies. > > Technical means for access to encrypted data will probably > come first in communications, then to stored material. There > will be an agreement for increased CALEA wiretap funding, which > is what the two cellular and wired suits against the FBI intend, > (paralleling what the hardware and software industries want from > federal buyers of security products). > > This will provide the infrastructural regime for the gov to monitor > and store domestic traffic as NSA does for the global, using the > same technology (NSA may provide service to domestic > LEA as it now does for other gov customers for intel). > > Other access will come through hardware and software for > computers, paralleling technology developed for telecomm tapping, > tracking and monitoring. > > Most probably through overt/covert features of microprocessors > and OS's, as reported recently of Wintel and others, but also > probably with special chips for DSP and software for modular > design -- why build from scratch when these handy kits are > available. > > As noted here, the features will appear first as optional, in response > to demand from commerce, from parents, from responsible > institutions, to meet public calls for protection, for privacy, for > combating threats to the American people. > > Like wiretap law, use of the features for preventative snooping will > initially require a court order, as provided in several of the crypto > legislative proposals. > > Like the wiretap orders, gradually there will be no secret court refusals > for requests to use the technology in the national interest. > > A publicity campain will proclaims that citizens with nothing to hide > will have nothing to fear. Assurance of safety will be transparent, > no clicks on the line. In a digital world, home-office devices will send > lifestyle data to the device manufacturers over the always monitoring > transparental Net. > > Personal privacy will evaporate almost unnoticeably, as with the tv > remote control, cp/defcon/bar brag, telephone, fax and forever-lovers > pillowtalk.

1 0

cryptography and encryption
by Bernardo B. Terrado 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Could I interchange them. I know that the latter is under the former, but I'm still confused. Hope you'll understand. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Some people they might say that I'm hard to get to know. I go my own sweet way, well that maybe so. Something about the crowd that makes me walk alone. I never had a need in me to be the party's life and soul. It's me Bernie. metaphone(a)altavista.net ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

1 0

Re: PGP again....
by Jia Yan 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

ftp://net-dist.mit.edu -----Original Message----- From: Bernardo B. Terrado <bbt(a)mudspring.uplb.edu.ph> To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com <cypherpunks(a)toad.com> Date: Thursday, September 17, 1998 11:50 AM Subject: PGP again.... >I've tried looking for PGP and found many. >All are platforms for IBM PC's (using ms dos, windows). > >Is there one for Sun Sparc and the likes or I'll just run the PGP for >PC's in my Sparc (using unix or PC's using unix). > >(forgive me for my lack of info about PGP and platforms). > > > > > > > > > > > > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ >Some people they might say that I'm hard to get to know. >I go my own sweet way, well that maybe so. >Something about the crowd that makes me walk alone. >I never had a need in me to be the party's life and soul. > >It's me Bernie. >metaphone(a)altavista.net >``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``` > >

2 1

PGP
by Bernardo B. Terrado 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Could you send me the source code of the most recent PGP. (for Unix) My server is very slow like a turtle. I don't mind if it's large. Could you please. Thank you. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Some people they might say that I'm hard to get to know. I go my own sweet way, well that maybe so. Something about the crowd that makes me walk alone. I never had a need in me to be the party's life and soul. It's me Bernie. metaphone(a)altavista.net ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

1 0

Re: Child-Molesting Forger's Chilling Confession!!!1!
by Wolfgang Diemert 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

application/www-form-urlencoded

1 0

No Subject
by Mixmaster 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

looking around on various crypto sites I can't find any hashes ported to dos/win that are already compiled is anyone out there aware of a place with a copy o MD5 or SHA1 and my second question, I was also curious about PGP. In the latest version (cyberknights build) You can use 8kbits DH key or a 16Kbits RSA key, In my reasoning I would think that since DH was out before RSA and RSA was chosen for the first releases of PGP why switch to DH now, if it was better why not start out using that?

1 0

IRS Spam on CJ
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a follow-up to the IRS Jim Bell spam last year, the IRS troll on CNN recently and other provocations. Anybody get IRS or other spam/troll about CJ? If so, we'd like to see the message with full headers (ID omitted if you like). Post here or send privately. Anon okay, probably best. We'll share what we get. If PGP preferred use the latest PK on the servers for <jya(a)pipeline.com>, or any of the older ones. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBNgDz7YNEX855Nu9gEQIVcgCfRebUik5OdC0JDOZC0U7/C815I3cAniER uOjU/6mmkkO/edw80+qMKnN8 =xEON -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0