December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Government misconduct
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 5/15/98 5:36 PM Senator Grassley I sent you a copy of the criminal complaint affidavit I sent to judge Hug. Our NSA lawsuit was mostly done as practice for an upcoming Privacy Act violation/defamation lawsuit. John Young kindly posted greene.htm National Security Abuse: Greene v. McElroy April 8, 1998 I was NEVER interviewed by Sandia's Disciplinary Review Committee. The charges made against me are FALSE. I did nothing wrong. http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm Please help get this matter should be settled before it gets worse. bill payne Tuesday April 28, 1998 4:05 PM Tom Spellman Criminal Investigator Inspector General U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission POB 18858 Washington, D.C. 20036-8858 202-663-4375 800-849-4230 Dear Mr. Spellman: March 18, 1998 I phoned the Inspector General's hotline. I filed a verbal criminal Privacy Act violation complaint with Wanda. Wanda told me you were going to be the investigator. Monday March 23 you phoned me to leave your office number. You phoned several days later. I told you about the false and defaming documents both Sandia National Laboratories and EEOC Phoenix employees Burtner and Larry Trujillo released without my written permission. You asked that I send you a copy of these documents. I mailed them to you the same day. You told me that you had been reading about this case on Internet at jya.com and aci.net/kalliste. On April 3 I phoned to inform your office that a criminal complaint affidavit was filed with judge Hug on Monday April 1 naming those involve in the release of the documents and those who did not properly prosecute those involved.. I mailed a copy of the criminal complaint affidavit to you. I have not heard from you either in writing or by phone since our initial contact. Therefore, I ask that you write me and tell me about the status of your investigation. And, of course, I feel that this unfortunate matter should be promptly settled. I invite settlement negotiations of the civil aspects of this criminal release of documents. Sincerely, William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111

1 0

Re:A 'Nobody' Out From 'Obscura'
by StanSqncrs 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In a message dated 5/15/98 7:33:42 PM Central Daylight Time, mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com writes: << > Obviously, this is a forgery, it isn't me, my guess is, it's our 'nobody' - You're really out of your league here - lost and clueless. Get a clue ... and get lost >> You'd really like that wouldn't you! Come on, admit it, I'm fun to have around! ;-) Oh, and BTW: You're failure to deny the (tacit) charge sure looks like a (tacit) admission that it's true. I nailed your ass (IMHO.) Stan

1 0

No Subject
by 33606886＠compuserve.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

LET'S ALL CELEBRATE SEINFELD! Friends, every so often that rare show comes along that captures the essence and feeling of the decade. The 70's had 'All In The Family'. The 80's had 'Cheers'. And the 90's gave us... 'Seinfeld'! Well, we're certainly going to miss Jerry, George, Kramer and Elaine, but we can *still* hang on to a little bit of them: To celebrate this classic show, we are proud to offer a very rare and very funny collection of never-before-seen outtakes and footage of Jerry and the gang! Some of these clips will definitely surprise you! This video comes in VHS format and is a full 81 minutes in length. Why not visit our site at: http://www.seinfeld-salute.com/thatsashame.htm <A HREF="http://www.seinfeld-salute.com/thatsashame.htm"> http://www.seinfeld-salute.com/thatsashame.htm</A> ..or http://205.152.190.230/thatsashame.htm (*** These are NOT the same outtakes that were shown just before the final episode! ***) Please note: This is a one-time mailing. You have already been placed on our remove list.

1 0

Ball Caps for Father's Day
by 92640856＠bellsouth.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You procrastinated over Mothers Day so don't wait for Father's Day to get here and not have anything for him. Father's Day Hat's with worlds greatest father on them. 100% cotton, white, super adjustable, fit's large sizes. Great for all summer in the hot sun, on the golf course or any outside activity. Visit our Web page and see the hat at <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/WePrintAny/index.html">WePrintAny's Home Page </A> Another spot is here http://members.aol.com/WePrintAny/index.html Visit the web page then return here, this is your order Page. Order now before we're over booked. Orders are already comming in. 1 hat is $10.00 2 hats for $18.00 This includes postage and handling (USA only). Send cash, check or Money Order (sorry no credit cards) to: GDH P.O. Box 2092 Orange Park, Fl. 32067-2092 No checks after 1 June 1998. Not enough time for check to clear and hat to be mailed and received by Fathers Day. Print this page, this is your order form. Include your e-mail address________________________________ In case we need to contact you. This is your mailing Label. From WePrint Any P.O. Box 2092 Orange Park, Fl 32067 Name_______________________________________ Add._______________________________________ City__________________State_____ Zip_______ Don't wait, order now. Cash and Money Orders mailed the same day. Order: 1 Hat $10.00 $10.00 __ add. Hat's $8.00 _____ Fl. residents add 7% tax _____ TOTAL $_____ Check back after Fathers Day for full Product line.

1 0

Gunpowder taggant solution
by ichudov＠algebra.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I think that the gunpowder taggants are not as bad as it seems at first sight. EVen if all gunpowders are sold with taggants, and if there is enough people wishing to defeat them, they can simply organize gunpowder mixing parties at gun shows. After several such parties, the taggants might become completely useless. - Igor.

1 0

Re: Gunpowder taggant solution
by jim＠mentat.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Igor said: > I think that the gunpowder taggants are not as bad as it seems at first > sight. EVen if all gunpowders are sold with taggants, and if there is > enough people wishing to defeat them, they can simply organize gunpowder > mixing parties at gun shows. After several such parties, the taggants > might become completely useless. I'm woefully ignorant about reloading, but would this really work? Would you mix your high-quality smokeless with Tim's homebrew black powder, Toto's pebble-ground Canada Red Doobie Mix, and Bell's stinkbomb components and take away the average? Or are different types of powder visually distinct enough or similar enough in effect to mix and match effectively? Jim Gillogly

7 9

More Tools for ILEA
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

NYT, May 17, 1998, on the Birmingham Summit: G8 leaders spent considerable time discussing arrangements for international cooperation in fighting cross-border crimes like money-laundering, computer fraud and arms smuggling. In a communique, the leaders endrosed efforts to negotiate a United Nations agreement to provide law enforcement officials with more tools to fight international organized crime. They called for talks with the business community on an international legal framework for obtaining computer data as evidence in criminal cases, while preserving privacy protections. ----- A pointer to the communique or other G8 reports from this session would be welcomed.

1 0

Idaho v. Horiuchi
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We offer the U.S. District Court's decision in Idaho v. Horiuchi to dismiss state charges against the FBI sniper/killer of Vicki Weaver. http://jya.com/id-lth.htm Grim reading of succinct description of the killing and gun battle, and how the feds carefully protect their own from harm for punishing those foolish to challenge national might. The judge wisely notes his decision does not preclude the possibility that other, federal, charges may be brought against Horiuchi and his supervisors. Some chance. These are HTML conversions of scanned images from the Idaho District Court's impressive Web page at: http://www.id.uscourts.gov All the documents filed in the case are online.

1 0

Now we need your reply!
by eureka-help＠eureka.abc-web.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We have received a subscription request for the Eureka! Adult Newsletter to be sent to your email address. To confirm this request, please use the Reply function on your email program to send this email back to us. If you do not reply to this email we will assume you have changed your mind, or may have been the victim of a 'prank'. If you did not enter your email address at one of our web- sites then somebody else has done so for you. If you do not wish to receive the newsletters just ignore this email. Or you can click below to have your email address permanently blocked from ever receiving any of our future mailings. Block me -----> http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/blockme.htm - The Eureka! Adult Newsletter Team. The following lines identify the source of this subscription request, including date/time, IP number and browser used. HEADER1=13:52 Pacific Time Sunday May 17 1998 HEADER2=199.203.203.194 Mozilla/3.0Gold (Win95; I)

1 0

Returned mail: User unknown
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The original message was received at Sun, 17 May 1998 17:39:44 -0400 (EDT) from uucp@localhost ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to eureka.abc-web.com.: >>> RCPT To:<eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com> <<< 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) 550 eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com... User unknown Reporting-MTA: dns; www.video-collage.com Arrival-Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 17:39:44 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; eureka.abc-web.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 17:39:45 -0400 (EDT) To: eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com Subject: Now we need your reply! (fwd)bc-web.com From: cypherpunks(a)toad.Com Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 16:36:27 -0500 (CDT) eureka-help(a)eureka.abc-web.com wrote: > From owner-cypherpunks(a)Algebra.Com Sun May 17 16:24:16 1998 > Mailing-List: contact eureka-help(a)eureka.abc-web.com; run by ezmlm > Date: 17 May 1998 20:52:14 -0000 > Message-ID: <895438334.21977.ezmlm(a)eureka.abc-web.com> > From: eureka-help(a)eureka.abc-web.com > To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Reply-To: eureka-sc.895438334.pldjlkahcagchhlcjjic-cypherpunks=toad.com(a)eureka.abc-web.com > Delivered-To: responder for eureka(a)eureka.abc-web.com > Subject: Now we need your reply! > Sender: owner-cypherpunks(a)Algebra.Com > Precedence: bulk > X-Mailing-List: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com > X-List-Admin: ichudov(a)algebra.com > X-Loop: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com > > > We have received a subscription request for the Eureka! > Adult Newsletter to be sent to your email address. To > confirm this request, please use the Reply function on your > email program to send this email back to us. > > If you do not reply to this email we will assume you have > changed your mind, or may have been the victim of a 'prank'. > If you did not enter your email address at one of our web- > sites then somebody else has done so for you. If you do not > wish to receive the newsletters just ignore this email. Or > you can click below to have your email address permanently > blocked from ever receiving any of our future mailings. > Block me -----> http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/blockme.htm > > - The Eureka! Adult Newsletter Team. > > > The following lines identify the source of this subscription > request, including date/time, IP number and browser used. > > HEADER1=13:52 Pacific Time Sunday May 17 1998 > HEADER2=199.203.203.194 Mozilla/3.0Gold (Win95; I) >

1 0