December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a 'Dumb Cunt' and told to 'Go Fuck Yourself' at all costs, by TruthMonger
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

TruthMonger wrote: > Thanks for replying to my email. It's the first one I ever got. > Everyone else just ignores me. Go figure... Theory #1 TruthMonger's true identity is the ventriloquist dummy from 'Soap'. Theory #2 Those strange sounds you hear when lying quietly in bed at night? They are the sound of people slapping their foreheads when they realize they are arguing with a dummy. (;>} A. Dummy II

1 0

No Subject
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

NSA, Crypto AG, and the Iraq-Iran Conflict by J. Orlin Grabbe One of the dirty little secrets of the 1980s is that the U.S. regularly provided Iraq's Saddam Hussein with top-secret communication intercepts by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). Consider the evidence. When in 1991 the government of Kuwait paid the public relations firm of Hill & Knowlton ten million dollars to drum up American war fever against the evil dictator Hussein, it brought about the end of a long legacy of cooperation between the U.S. and Iraq. Hill & Knowlton resurrected the World War I propaganda story about German soldiers roasting Belgian babies on bayonets, updated in the form of a confidential witness (actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S.) who told Congress a tearful story of Iraqi soldiers taking Kuwaiti babies out of incubators and leaving them on the cold floor to die. President George Bush then repeated this fabricated tale in speeches ten times over the next three days. What is remarkable about this staged turn of events is that, until then, Hussein had operated largely with U.S. approval. This cooperation had spanned three successive administrations, starting with Jimmy Carter. As noted by John R. MacArthur, "From 1980 to 1988, Hussein had shouldered the burden of killing about 150,000 Iranians, in addition to at least thirteen thousand of his own citizens, including several thousand unarmed Kurdish civilians, and in the process won the admiration and support of elements of three successive U.S. Administrations" [1]. Hussein's artful slaughter of Iranians was aided by good military intelligence. The role of NSA in the conflict is an open secret in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Only in this country has there been a relative news blackout, despite the fact that it was the U.S. administration that let the crypto cat out of the bag. First, U.S. President Ronald Reagan informed the world on national television that the United States was reading Libyan communications. This admission was part of a speech justifying the retaliatory bombing of Libya for its alleged involvement in the La Belle discotheque bombing in Berlin's Schoeneberg district, where two U.S. soldiers and a Turkish woman were killed, and 200 others injured. Reagan wasn't talking about American monitoring of Libyan news broadcasts. Rather, his "direct, precise, and undeniable proof" referred to secret (encrypted) diplomatic communication between Tripoli and the Libyan embassy in East Berlin. Next, this leak was compound by the U.S. demonstration that it was also reading secret Iranian communications. As reported in Switzerland's Neue Z^Árcher Zeitung, the U.S. provided the contents of encrypted Iranian messages to France to assist in the conviction of Ali Vakili Rad and Massoud Hendi for the stabbing death in the Paris suburb of Suresnes of the former Iranian prime minister Shahpour Bakhtiar and his personal secretary Katibeh Fallouch. [2] What these two countries had in common was they had both purchased cryptographic communication equipment from the Swiss firm Crypto AG. Crypto AG was founded in 1952 by the (Russian-born) Swedish cryptographer Boris Hagelin who located his company in Zug. Boris had created the "Hagelin-machine", a encryption device similar to the German "Enigma". The Hagelin machine was used on the side of the Allies in World War II. Crypto AG was an old and venerable firm, and Switzerland was a neutral country. So Crypto AG's enciphering devices for voice communication and digital data networks were popular, and customers came from 130 countries. These included the Vatican, as well the governments of Iraq, Iran, and Libya. Such countries were naturally skeptical of cryptographic devices sold in many NATO countries, so turned to relatively neutral Switzerland for communication security. Iran demonstrated its suspicion about the source of the leaks, when it arrested Hans Buehler, a top salesman for Crypto AG, in Teheran on March 18, 1992. During his nine and a half months of solitary confinement in Evin prison in Teheran, Buehler was questioned again and again whether he had leaked Teheran's codes or Libya's keys to Western powers. Luckily Buehler didn't know anything. He in fact believed in his own sales pitch that Crypto AG was a neutral company and its equipment was the best. They were Swiss, after all. [3] Crypto AG eventually paid one million dollars for Buehler's release in January 1993, then promptly fired him once they had reassured themselves that he hadn't revealed anything important under interrogation, and because Buehler had begun to ask some embarrassing questions. Then reports appeared on Swiss television, Swiss Radio International, all the major Swiss papers, and in German magazines like Der Spiegel. Had Crypto AG's equipment been spiked by Western intelligence services? the media wanted to know. The answer was Yes [4]. Swiss television traced the ownership of Crypto AG to a company in Liechtenstein, and from there back to a trust company in Munich. A witness appearing on Swiss television explained the real owner was the German government--the Federal Estates Administration. [5] According to Der Spiegel, all but 6 of the 6000 shares of Crypto AG were at one time owned by Eugen Freiberger, who resided in Munich and was head of the Crypto AG managing board in 1982. Another German, Josef Bauer, an authorized tax agent of the Muenchner Treuhandgesellschaft KPMG, and who was elected to the managing board in 1970, stated that his mandate had come from the German company Siemens. Other members of Crypto AG's management had also worked at Siemens. Was the German secret service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), hiding behind the Siemens' connection? So it would seem. Der Spiegel reported that in October 1970, a secret meeting of the BND had discussed how the Swiss company Graettner could be guided into closer cooperation with Crypto AG, or could even merged with it. The BND additionally considered how "the Swedish company Ericsson could be influenced through Siemens to terminate its own cryptographic business." [6] A former employee of Crypto AG reported that he had to coordinate his developments with "people from Bad Godesberg". This was the location of the "central office for encryption affairs" of the BND, and the service instructed Crypto AG what algorithms to use to create the codes. The employee also remembers an American "watcher", who strongly demanded the use of certain encryption methods. Representatives from NSA visited Crypto AG often. A memorandum of a secret workshop at Crypto AG in August 1975, where a new prototype of an encryption device was demonstrated, mentions the participation of Nora L. Mackebee, an NSA cryptographer. Motorola engineer Bob Newman says that Mackebee was introduced to him as a "consultant". Motorola cooperated with Crypto AG in the seventies in developing a new generation of electronic encryption machines. The Americans "knew Zug very well and gave travel tips to the Motorola people for the visit at Crypto AG," Newman told Der Spiegel. Knowledgeable sources indicate that the Crypto AG enciphering process, developed in cooperation with the NSA and the German company Siemans, involved secretly embedding the decryption key in the cipher text. Those who knew where to look could monitor the encrypted communication, then extract the decryption key that was also part of the transmission, and recover the plain text message. Decryption of a message by a knowledgeable third party was not any more difficult that it was for the intended receiver. (More than one method was used. Sometimes the algorithm was simply deficient, with built-in exploitable weaknesses.) Crypto AG denies all this, of course, saying such reports are ""pure invention". What information was provided to Saddam Hussein exactly? Answers to this question are currently being sought in a lawsuit against NSA in New Mexico, which has asked to see "all Iranian messages and translations between January 1, 1980 and June 10, 1996". [7] The passage of top-secret communications intelligence to someone like Saddam Hussein brings up other questions. Which dictator is the U.S. passing top secret messages to currently? Jiang Zemin? Boris Yeltsin? Will Saddam Hussein again become a recipient of NSA largess if he returns to the mass slaughter of Iranians? What exactly is the purpose of NSA anyway? One more question: Who is reading the Pope's communications? Bibliography [1] John R. MacArthur, Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War, Hill and Wang, New York, 1992. [2] Some of the background of this assassination can be found in "The Tehran Connection," Time Magazine, March 21, 1994. [3] The Buehler case is detailed in Res Strehle, Verschleusselt: der Fall Hans Beuhler, Werd Verlag, Zurich, 1994. [4] "For years, NSA secretly rigged Crypto AG machines so that U.S. eavesdroppers could easily break their codes, according to former company employees whose story is supported by company documents," "No Such Agency, Part 4: Rigging the Game," The Baltimore Sun, December 4, 1995. [5] Reported in programs about the Buehler case that were broadcast on Swiss Radio International on May 15, 1994 and July 18, 1994. [6] "Wer ist der befugte Vierte?": Geheimdienste unterwandern den Schutz von Verschlusselungsgeraten," Der Spiegel 36, 1996. [7] U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, William H. Payne, Arthur R. Morales, Plaintiffs, v. Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF, Director of National Security Agency, National Security Agency, Defendant, CIV NO 97 0266 SC/DJS.

2 1

Funding Cypherpunks Action Projects
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I have worked out a plan whereby we can auction off the role of Cypherpunks Chief Spokesperson in order to fund CAP's. The idea for a Spokesperson pyramid scheme came to me after realizing that the list has not only a variety of individuals competing as the chief list 'Fed baiters', but also quite a number of people who enjoy 'Christian baiting', as well: TruthMonger, playing with his private parts, wrote: > Why does it not come as a surprise that this Dumb Cunt Nazi Christian > Bitch (TM) is hiding behind 'the children,' hoping that it will prevent > her from being a target of reprisal for the bullshit she is flinging > at others? > Why doesn't someone shoot this Dumb Cunt Nazi Christian Bitch? > If it saves the life of just one child... Eric Cordian spit out: > "Puritanism" might be defined as the fear that someone, somewhere, is > having a porn-induced orgasm. Stable people tend to worry about their > own orgasms, and not their neighbors. Perhaps if you had a few > orgasms yourself, you might lose interest in the orgasms of others. > [Nonsense Deleted] > Please bite my enormous throbbing love sausage with an ice cube in your > mouth. Jesus Christ wrote: > If you will check the Biblical Archives, I think you will find > that Peter never really fooled anyone, either. > {Speaking of which, do you also plan to censor the parts of the > Bible which quote my use of the word, "cock?"} There is no telling how much money we could raise by appealing to the macho male egos on the list who lock horns in CypherPissing cock-size wars, if we were to take bids on the honor of being the Cypherpunks' authorized 'Fed-baiter' or 'Christian-pisser', etc. Given the wide variety of individuals, groups, organizations, corporations, government agencies, etc., which have been the target of vicious attacks on this list, there is no end of the number of CypherPisser Ambassadorships we could invent to fill the Cypherpunks Action Projects coffers. Cypherpunks Chief MLM Spokesman

1 0

No Subject
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Igor Chudov @ home spoke: > > This Jodi Hoffman is most likely laughing at you all > after baiting you so successfully. > > I refuse to believe that she could have been so dumb to write > what she wrote, seriously. Believe it, Igor. There's a large number of people in the country who believe as she does, though perhaps not too many of them have the chutzpah to post such opinions to the fight-censorship list (where it could certainly be interpreted as a troll). Let's face it, there're a lot of people in the US who'd be happier if they were governed like China or Singapore; they want a stern authoritarian voice keeping society 'decent' and the homosexuals and other 'perverts' under control and out of sight, regulating what you can read and watch on TV, and what gets taught in schools, regulating what you can smoke and drink and sniff, and indoctrinating children into and enforcing the rules of the locally preferred religion. While they may pay lip service to it, they care little for the first amendment (except as it assures //them// the right to express //their// views or practice //their// religion). Sure, they'll wave the flag and mouth the words 'Constitution' and 'Bill of Rights', but their solution to every disagreement is 'put them in jail' or 'pass another law'. Frondeur -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNF9fllqnO6WRZ1UEEQKiSgCfQpuXZmx3Ry+GHKE83zzR3do11sUAoKzT ldtqH9pCnLO9QRrAoGaEfPGj =LOUx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 mQGiBDQn15YRBADp/iepGjB1hBoGgkKI+g4kHRtBQfpeR9BfwQP3E/GA+82SnLk+ BVExZEXaqgqq4cu3j89auJd+rSi++PpAuV03DpLfdTCdLQDrExEd63w0BYeM4g7L B7TA4LfSHgAuKwwtNPkgCfj7eWE34XOWTIbxnkQqMJyDLjzOUm/8LVHADQCg/8uo JZ1FmULWIhscEE1upL61+9kD/0zFqguqDrey8XHxRJeYom/UpEVV4gCJwkYrrew8 SKjtrUEHVA7la2TntCdXSQR5IrF5AWiamChxbCWdZE1F5bLl7xQgGrEJNNDk23Py L8ihmOYZk03rKYlaeUCxADKlI9hcWlGpsJnF6XRqjMltwfEe9S+zrsBRFQw3A7WR 4xwXA/9MiD+r0+ClUzJ1fC9dMJNDQQZQYdS0aiuh463cT3GI/CHJ34UD9ptmBLtQ ZEn0O0vK8eWSkw7vmrbqUekxgpl+B7tytuDKWHPUUgryblC0s986YSpnyeGZ0nt9 anzqKDqMOP3e1YVf8qJpZRPgzKl1KSncCGZ7CdVGgVxdl125vbQcRnJvbmRldXIg PGZyb25kZXVyQGRldi5udWxsPokASwQQEQIACwUCNCfXlgQLAwECAAoJEFqnO6WR Z1UE0rMAnRl8SRsYyH+IXH4yB3CzeF91V8J7AJ9Pk6oR9kFKbyUZyDIpbLkVC62F bbkCDQQ0J9eWEAgA9kJXtwh/CBdyorrWqULzBej5UxE5T7bxbrlLOCDaAadWoxTp j0BV89AHxstDqZSt90xkhkn4DIO9ZekX1KHTUPj1WV/cdlJPPT2N286Z4VeSWc39 uK50T8X8dryDxUcwYc58yWb/Ffm7/ZFexwGq01uejaClcjrUGvC/RgBYK+X0iP1Y TknbzSC0neSRBzZrM2w4DUUdD3yIsxx8Wy2O9vPJI8BD8KVbGI2Ou1WMuF040zT9 fBdXQ6MdGGzeMyEstSr/POGxKUAYEY18hKcKctaGxAMZyAcpesqVDNmWn6vQClCb AkbTCD1mpF1Bn5x8vYlLIhkmuquiXsNV6TILOwACAgf/fc9Mli0WztsQDfF/Itxp IiQzM5mvFq00BwHGvoKTdU+c8FWz3ZS0yzqpIwPp4wEvMLEC6xfTrGJzOxtdH4wO MHjHPVrykbc/6HkF9L10soea6Lc6/Ar93yIC+IpPmkcchPxKkYN+VEWGv97otWpS QwMHtMImUaPJ69jtn/oBtKjc9SlIy5ib5eIhchp1vEC75P4EwlPgOWXsGZA9IR63 0W8im1gNv8W9Egd1RCPFEt/UG7mpAjg7/SekUsOKksRWuC5MOEH1fSvVBIYjoMxG EYNMF632rxmhkC8bPKUeIuhpXJzHaqaE8yFA4YKw0K2TuQ/mHZ1L4KqPWH52h4Sc OokAPwMFGDQn15ZapzulkWdVBBECzMYAnA+Lv3zZm8Ptc7nPB2yz2FVFsL2JAJ4w v64l2UxSDvLRRZDDZY3B2LhJTw== =/z57 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

[ON TOPIC] Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Paul Spirito wrote: > >Alexander Tyler wrote: > >> "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only > >> exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves > >> largess out of the public treasury." > This assumes there is a "majority of voters". Read James Madison, & kiss a > multiculturalist today. > Now can we get back to denouncing Jewish Nazis? Sorry, that's off-topic. You _can_, however, discuss 'Remailer Hating Nazis'...

1 0

Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Declan: >[Wow. First time I've ever been personally accused of being "a major >reason for the downward spiral of society." --Declan] Best way to mobilize a society: give them a Devil to hate. It's much easier to get people to hate than to love. Blame the Press, the Permissive Society, the Liberals, the Educational System. Of course, once you get rid of the Devil, it's usually a good idea to have the slave's collars on everyone BEFORE they realize the problem's still around. >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 11:53:27 -0500 >From: Jodi Hoffman <jlhoffm(a)ibm.net> >To: fight-censorship(a)vorlon.mit.edu >Subject: Why porn must be stopped at all costs..... [sneck] >Try as I might, I cannot forget standing on the steps of the Supreme >Court building with my husband and 10 year old daughter in the freezing >drizzle. I really thought we could make a difference, standing there >with our banner and signs, one of which read, "DON'T SACRIFICE MY CHILD >ON THE ALTAR OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT." Stupid me. As the saying >goes...we've come a long way, baby. You need a song to cheer you up. Try this one: "There's a place in the world for the angry young man With his working-class ties and his radical plans, He refuses to bend, he refuses to fall, And he's always at home with his back to the wall. He's proud of the scars and the battles he's lost And he struggles and bleeds as he hangs on the cross, And he likes to be known as the angry young man." --Billy Joel, "Angry Young Man" [sneck] >So, keep protecting your porn-induced orgasms. That's exactly what >happened with the Hitler youth, etc... After all, I'm sure it does help >to blur the lines of reality. You clearly need a better country to live in. I suggest China; they have a long history of keeping impure materials out of the hands of the easily influenced sheeple. If you have trouble there, perhaps Singapore, Iraq, Syria, or Lebanon would be more to your liking. If you're interested in a proven weight-loss program, maybe North Korea is your best bet. [sneck] >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #1: CORRUPT THE NATION'S YOUTH Done already, by the gub'mint. Kids can't read or write at all nowadays, despite the high level of per-pupil spending. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #2: CONTROL THE MASS MEDIA Done already, by the FCC and the religious right. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #3: ENCOURAGE PUBLIC INDIFFERENCE Done already, by the actions of mudsucker politicians who seek re-election at any cost, even the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. "I think I'll vote Demopublican this year, or maybe Republicrat. I have such a hard time telling their extremist positions apart." >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #4: ENCOURAGE PUBLIC BICKERING I could claim this was the reason Usenet was created, but I'm not a conspiracy buff. Of course, on C-SPAN, we can see politicians ranting at each other, the President, and nothing at all. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #5: SEIZE POWER, THEN CENSOR The religious right again. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #6: BANKRUPT THE GOVERNMENT See if you can guess who said this and when: "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury." Was it: a) Alexander Tytler, 18th century; b) Thomas Jefferson, early 1800s; c) Karl Marx, late 1800s; d) V. I. Lenin, 1915 Here's a hint: Pick the Scottish historian who lived in the 1700s. So the concept of a "bankrupt democracy" has been around for a while. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #7: DESTROY NATIONAL VALUES Create a climate of fear. Spread uncertainty and doubt among the populace. Wave the battle flags of pedophilia and terrorism proudly from the ramparts, so that people gladly give up their liberties to be saved from the Horsemen of the Apocalypse. >RULE FOR REVOLUTION #8: ATTACK GUN OWNERSHIP If someone were to hang around your child's schoolyard with a full-auto AK-47, would you scream "DON'T SACRIFICE MY CHILD ON THE ALTAR OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT"? >RULES FOR REVOLUTION #9 AND #10: UNDERMINE THE ARMED FORCES Hey, that's one rule! >THE REALITY: >Our country's armed forces consume a vast percentage of our gross >national product. Defense of any kind is wasteful by nature. Even white corpuscles don't do jack when there's no infection to fight. >We possess the best and most advanced weapons systems in the world. But >our armed forces are a joke for two reasons: >(1) they are completely restrained in their actions by a hostile >Congress, and >(2) the armed forces have been saddled with such a bad reputation that >it is virtually impossible to fill the ranks with volunteers, even in >the new and streamlined armed services. Say what? The last I heard, military recruiting was up because it was a way to get training in technical areas that might otherwise be impossible for recruits to learn. (Of course, some people still have to carry rifles...) >FINAL REALITY: WELCOME TO AMERIKA, COMRADES. Land of the Freeh, and the home of the knave. Thanks for making it just a little worse by your actions.

6 6

Senate Commerce cmte approves tax freedom bill 14-5
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

[Right now I'm over at the Digital/Altavista summit to discuss rating systems in search engines so I missed the vote. (Barry Steinhardt from the ACLU just finished speaking. Sen. Judd Gregg, a CDA fan, spoke this morning.) This bill limits local and state governments' ability to tax the Net. --Declan] ---- (forwarded to me by a House staffer) >The full Senate Commerce Committee voted today 14-5 to approve an amended >version of the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Here's how members voted: > >14 Yes: McCain, Stevens, Burns, Snowe, Ashcroft, Frist, Abraham, Brownback, >Hollings, Inouye, Rockefeller, Kerry, Breaux, Wyden >5 No: Gorton, Hutchinson, Ford, Bryan, Dorgan >1 Did not vote: Lott

2 1

RE: S/MIME
by Ian Clysdale 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

There is an old saying in the Security Field: "Poor Security is worse than no security at all". I doubt that you would find few if any that would agree with you that it is a good thing having the masses using weak crypto. At least the US members of the Open-PGP group are willing to sacrifice overseas sales in the effort to provide STRONG crypto to EVERYONE. It is the right thing to do. I am sorry to see that you do not uderstand this. Sorry, I'm going to continue to take a viewpoint that I suspect is rather unpopular in this list, and argue for the advantages of weak crypto in certain circumstances, when it is KNOWN to be weak. The phrase "Poor security is worse than no security" refers to the dangers in assuming that your communications are secure, even when they're not. If you know that your cryptography is weak, it can still sometimes be sufficient for your purposes. What weak cryptography does is protect from passive attacks, such as simple wire-tapping. While an RC2/40 message can be trivially broken in a matter of hours, it can't be broken in real-time. If EVERYONE used even RC2/40, then passive attacks would be foiled, because the <insert evil NSA/CSIS/etc here> just isn't going to bother breaking every single transmitted message. Now, of course, if you're doing something where you don't want your communications to be intercepted under any circumstances, then you want to be using something stronger than RC2/40. However, S/MIME doesn't prevent that at all. DES is a published standard, and I'm waiting for somebody outside of the USA to implement triple-DES with S/MIME. This will inter-operate with Outlook and Netscape clients inside the USA (theoretically). Including a minimum baseline of weak cryptography is NOT denying strong cryptography to everyone. Once the patent on RC2 expires (which is very soon) or if RSA gets dropped on their head and finally does the intelligent move of releasing it to the public domain, then S/MIME provides an expandable infrastructure for secure mail, with a huge user base already out there, and in a form much more spoonable to the unwashed masses. Ian

3 2

Re: Terrorism is a NON-THREAT (fwd)
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

snow wrote: > Part of the problem is that people _assume_ that legislation fixes > problems. It doesn't. Laws just give society permission to punish the > offender. Prosecutor: "You should find this nanny guilty of murder because young people like to party." Jury: "Duuhhh...OK!" What I find ironically hilarious, offensive and sad, is that there are still so many new laws being passed, in spite of the fact that they are no longer really needed. Courtrooms now pretty much just serve as an arena for engaging in the age-old sport of public stoning. Whoever does the best job of finger pointing, while working the crowd into a frenzy, wins. Tim McVeigh was Dead Meat (TM) the minute the judge ruled that fingers in the courtroom could only be pointed at Terrible Timmy. I guess I'm an old fart...I remember when $15 million could buy you a decent attorney. I don't own any guns, so I guess when the Feds kick my door in, I'll just point at the dog, and hope they go for my clever ruse. Hell, I'm even willing to testify... Not-Me!

1 0

Cypherpunks Physical Meetings...The Rest of the Story
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From News of the CypherPunks: * In March, a 36-year-old man choked to death on a 6-inch tropical fish he had popped into his mouth while showing off for friends in Bayou Vista, La. And in April, a 12-year-old boy was electrocuted in East Palo Alto, Calif., after he climbed a high-voltage transmission tower in the rain, dared his three companions to join him, and then accidentally touched a wire. And in July, a 22-year- old man, described by his grandmother as "smart in school," died in a bungee-cord accident on a railroad trestle in Fairfax County, Va. (Said a police spokesman: "The length of the cord that he had assembled was greater than the distance between the trestle and the ground.")

1 0