December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Fighting the cybercensor. (fwd)
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:12 AM 1/26/97 -0600, Jim Choate <ravage(a)EINSTEIN.ssz.com> wrote: >stewart> Nonsense - the net doesn't "belong" to "Singapore or China" - > >The part of it that comes out of their pocketbook does. Just like the part of >'the net' that I pay for belongs to me. The net is a bunch of computers, >running software, hooked together over cables and other links. Each and >EVERY ONE of these require installation, upkeep, repair, and utility >support. This costs money. He who pays the money owns the net, everybody >else is along for the ride. For individuals, and voluntary groups of individuals, that's certainly true. But what about taxpayers involuntarily paying for a network run by bureaucrats - does each individual have an equal right to decide what he/she will say or read on the net, or are some individuals more equal than others? And if so, why is it the armed thugs who want to censor people who get to be more equal? It's the usual insoluable problem about how to decide policy for involuntarily-funded services - the government is morally obligated to follow the wishes of everybody paying for them, which are in radical conflict. It's bad enough with schools... The Arpanet had its Acceptable Use Policy, which limited speech on goverment-funded parts of the net to non-commercial use; one of main drivers behind the Commercial Internet Exchange was to allow businesses to send each other email without being limited by it. >ps I also support France's current attempt at forcing the Georgia university > web site on French soil to use French. And then there's the French Telecom Monopoly (until it falls apart) - if you don't like the rules the bureaucrats make for what you can say or read, you're not even allowed to build your own telecom network or obtain services from providers who don't censor what you can say or read. And I also don't support the French government's attempt at forcing its own subjects on French soil to use French. Asking them nicely, or running propaganda against Academically-incorrect French, is something the Academie can do itself. # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)

1 0

Re: Cellular phone triangulation
by snow 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Our prisons are overflowing with drug dealers and drug users who were > put there by quite ordinary means which didn't involve violating or > discarding the rights of the ordinary citizen. Yet we keep hearing Wanna bet? > do so. > Not to mention larger and larger amounts of money. > But, maybe if you became a 'drug dealer'... I'd rather become an "arms dealer".

1 0

Re: Cellular location...
by Three Blind Mice 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sat, 25 Jan 1997, Mark M. wrote: > I wonder how expensive it would be to put a GPS receiver in a cell phone and > have the option to transmit the coordinates on a separate channel. There > would be little difference between this and forcing cell phone companies to > triangulate every call. The primary motivation for this is almost certainly > "location escrow" to make it easier for the feds to track drug dealers. Of course, one could always follow the ID4 example and triangulate cells from a single location, preferably using equipment that any small-time operator can find in his own car. -- 3bmice

1 0

Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5
by Rich Burroughs 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

It really does rock. I owned Eudora 3 already, but if I didn't I would purchase it for using PGPmail alone. Another great feature of PGPmail is that it adds PGP functionality to the Windows Explorer. When you right-click on a file in Windows, a PGP submenu is added to the normal right-click menu, allowing you to encrypt, decrypt, etc. This product really has the ease of use that is needed to get PGP more into the mainstream. Like Duncan, I found it very easy to incorporate my existing keyrings. I'm very impressed. I haven't tried it with NT 4.0 yet, and don't know how well it works. I run the same copy of Eudora with 95 and NT, so I'm assuming it will be fine... Rich _______________________________________________________________________ Rich Burroughs richieb(a)teleport.com http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/ See my Blue Ribbon Page at http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/blueribbon/ dec96 issue "cause for alarm" - http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/cause/

1 0

Re: microcurrency: Netscape vs. Microsoft
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:05 PM 1/18/97 -0800, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote: >I predict that microcurrency will not catch on in a big way >until it is integrated with browsers, and when it is, it ..... >the idea would also be to invent some new html tags that >indicate the charge on a link. the charge is incurred when ..... >of time before some enterprising programmers plug it all >together in an easy to use way. (as far as I know the >Digicash software is not easily integrated with any browser, >am I correct?) The Digicash software wasn't terribly easy to integrate with _anything_, but folks like Lucky Green have been banging on them to define and release their interface specs, and there's a library called -lucre that will do the Digicash functions. A few months ago, Ian demonstrated a Digicash-compatible plugin at one of our Bay Area cypherpunks meetings (with blinding removed for patent reasons.) I don't know about BorgBrowser, but with Netscape, you can implement non-built-in features as either a plug-in or as a helper application; no need to mess with the HTML spec in yet another browser-specific manner. You can also wedge things in using cookies (though their are non-cookie-aware browsers and people who turn their browsers off) which could work well for lower-security microcurrencies. For instance, connecting to http://newspaper.com/cookie-store.html could take your credit card with SSL and give you a cookie with 100 or 1000 credits using some S/Key-like mechanism, and each time you read a news page it would decrement by one. To avoid fraud (people resetting their cookie files) the newspaper would have to track cookie use, but they may be tracking who's reading what anyway. # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)

1 0

Re: overview.htm (fwd)
by snow 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> > getting this degenerate disease when they get older. Check out the > > videos by Howard Lyman, who used to be a big-time "chemical" farmer. > > One quote: "My soil after a few years was like asbestos". > As far as I understand, 1) no one really understands why cancer rates > are up so much and 2) since people live longer, they are more likely do > have cancer. While I don't claim to to be a Medical Researcher, I think that 1) should be reworded to be "No one is willing to _admit_ why cancer rates are up so much". You (generic) can look at certain population groups where there is low incidence(sp?) of cancer, and then look at our society and it becomes pretty obvious. Breast Cancer is exteremely rare in japenese women living in Japan. Thes same women <excuse me while I light a cigerate> move to the US, start living like American start developing breast cancer at a rate very similar to that of American born women. IMO the biggest reason that "no one really understands why cancer rates are up..." is that "they" are looking for the single bullet when reality isn't usually that simple. I would be willing to make a bet that if you could get a large population group to do the following, you would see a large statistical reduction in the incidence(sp?) of cancer. 1) Eat a lot of fruits, vegetables & breads and cerials. Stay away from large quantities of meat. Try to reduce your fat intake to under 20 grams a day (USDA recommends around 40) 2) Exercise regularly. Ride a bike or walk/run to work. 3) Avoid excess in all things. > What you said is one of the hypotheses. I personally feel that > environment and bad greasy food are other major contributors. > The way they cook all these fries, with overheated grease, is very > bad. BINGO!. Sorry, gotta go, it's dinner time and McD's is calling...

1 0

RE: Fighting the cybercensor
by blanc 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: Dr.Dimitri Vulis However U.S.G. is able to say that people of Iraq or Lybia or Cuba should not be permitted on the 'net. It also bombs Iraq and murders their civilians in retaliation for something their governments supposedly did. ................................................................ The U.S.G. has many more resources than most of us to do these things, including equipment, cooperative troops, money, and recognition from other governments. If other nations disagree with the U.S.G. they have the resources to discuss, bargain, negotiate, criticize, form alliances, take their chances and retaliate, etc. These things are done on a level not accessible to the most of us. All that we individuals have are access to telephone lines, computers, and modems. Yet even as we speak the world is being "wired" with cables to further make this singular communication possible and open up avenues to non-government organized activities: international corporations are se tting up offices, services, and correspondence wherever in the world they can find markets. All this is happening even while the governments are complaining to each other about what their citizens are posting (tch, tch) and threatening to deprive each other of that privilege. While governments and their True Believer citizens are dealing with each other on one level, the rest of the world is reorganizing itself into a different order of living and doing business. They are sharing ideas and examining their concepts and beliefs, they are conducting a lot of their disagreements on the net (instead of physically against each other on the ground), opening up to a broader view of relationships between individuals, or to governments, or to religions, sexuality, etc. The situation hasn't completely changed yet, but it is in process. .. Blanc

1 0

[Humor] Crypto in Traveller (a game)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, I thought I would pass this along to demonstrate that all uses of crypto are not 'real world'... Hope you enjoy. Jim Choate CyberTects ravage(a)ssz.com Forwarded message: > To: traveller(a)MPGN.COM > Subject: Re: Aperture Synthesis, Aegis > Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 21:40:18 +0000 > > At 08:15 AM 1/26/97 +0000, you wrote: > <snip> > >For example, at 5 ls, you have ship A sending data to ship B, which has > >to know "exactly" how long it took for the data to cross the gap, as > >that's one of the parameters in the calculations. > > > >If it's "exactly" 5 seconds, then each ship "combines" the data it > >receives directly with the data received 5 seconds later from the other > >ship. The combining involves various things like trig and other messy > >stuff. But it all boils down to "A saw X1 from direction Y1 at time Z1, B > >saw X2 from Y2 at Z2". You combine the info and triangulate. > > > >So at 5 ls, you have a "data lag" of the 5 seconds it takes the signal > >to cross the distance *plus* the processing time. > > > >And since the distance *will* vary, even if only by a little bit, that > >changes the point in the your datastream that you are comparing with > >the datastream from the other ship. > > > > Could we presume that vessels operating together would have some type of > synchronized timekeeping, such as an atomic clock, in each ship, with each > message between ships being time & velocity stamped so that each receiver > could adjust the data for integration to local data? > > We should also assume a really good (and closely gaurded) encryption on the > interchanges, or enemy intercepts would be right dangerous. > > Adventure possiblity: trying to obtain a given unit's encryption code or > seeking to recover said code.

1 0

Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5
by Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bill Stewart <stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com> writes: > At 11:45 AM 1/26/97 -0500, Duncan Frissell wrote: > >Anyone running Windows 95 who hasn't grabbed the beta of PGPmail 4.5 from > >http://www.pgp.com/ is crazy. It works seamlessly with Netscape 3.0 and > >Eudora Pro 3.0. The 30-day demo of Eudora Pro is at: > http://www.eudora.com/prodemo/. > > PGPmail 4.5 now has beta 10 available - the download is smaller than beta 9. > > Eudora Lite 3.0.1 also supports plugins, so it should work. > It also supports filters, which has allowed probable flames to > quietly vanish from my inbox :-) > > BTW, from a non-government-user perspective, the questions asked to establish > export permission are nicely worded. Rather than asking > "Are you a US Subject", and "Do you agree to follow every vague > detail of the Export Laws", as some sites do, it asks > > - Is the requesting computer located within the United States? [N/Y] > > - Do you acknowledge affirmatively that you understand that PGPmail is > > subject to export controls under the Export Administration Act and > > that you cannot export the software without a license? [N/Y] > > - Do you certify that you are not on any of the United States Government's > > lists of export-precluded parties or otherwise ineligible to receive this > > transfer of cryptographic software subject to export controls under the > > Export Administration Act? > and then has a button saying > "I certify that the above answers are truthful", > which is flexible enough that I don't have to feel bad about not being > _absolutely_ certain that my packets aren't getting routed through Canada, > or that I'm not on some list that bans telephone company employees from > downloading cryptographic software on Tuesdays, or whether > computers 30 feet above the US are subject to this week's export rules :-), > or having to say "No" to Question 2 because I understand that you _can_ > export this software without a license (just do it) even though the Feds > disapprove.... > > > # Thanks; Bill > # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com > # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp > # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.) > It doesn't seem to work with the mail program in MS IE, or MS WordMail. I understand why some people don't like Microsoft, but excluding support for popular Microsoft programs seems contrary to their stated goal of promoting the use of crypto. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0

Cellular Encryption Docs
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to David Wagner and Steve Schear, we've learned about the latest documents on cellular encryption which supercede the 1992 CAVE document, Appendix A to IS-54, which contained the CAVE algorithm. Here are the latest, followed by ordering information. TIA/EIA/IS-136.1-A -- TDMA Cellular/PCS - Radio Interface - Mobile Station - Base Station Compatibility - Digital Control Panel, October, 1996, 372 pp. $350.00. Addendum No. 1 to IS-136.1-A, November, 1996, 40 pp. Free. TIA/EIA/IS-136.2-A -- TDMA Cellular/PCS - Radio Interface - Mobile Station - Base Station Compatibility - Traffic Channels and FSK Control Channel, October, 1996, 378 pp. $310.00. TIA/EIA-627 -- 800 MHZ Cellular System, TDMA Radio Interface, Dual-Mode Mobile Station - Base Station Compatibility Standard, June, 1996, 258 pp. $120.00. These documents can be ordered from: Global Engineering Documents 15 Inverness Way East Englewood, Colorado 80112 Telephone: 1-800-854-7179 However, each of the documents lists the following related supplements which contain "sensitive information" and may be obtained by US/CA citizens from TIA by signing a Non-Disclosure Agreement and acceptance of export restrictions: Appendix A to IS-136. Appendix A to 627. Common Cryptographic Algorithms. Interface Specification for Common Cryptographic Algorithms. These controlled documents can be requested by calling Ms. Sharon Vargish at 1-703-907-7702, who will fax an NDA, and upon receipt of the completed form, will send the controlled documents at no cost. Here's the NDA: AGREEMENT ON CONTROL AND NONDISCLOSURE OF COMMON CRYPTOGRAPHIC ALGORITHMS REVISION A TO IS-54, IS-95, AND IS-136 [Note: 627 supercedes IS-54; IS-95 is for CDMA] "I, _________________________, an employee/consultant/affiliate (typed name) of __________________________, hereafter, "the company," (Company name) _____________________________ (Company address) _____________________________ and a United States or Canadian citizen, acknowledge and understand that the subject documents, to which I will have access contain information [which] is subject to export control under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (Title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 120-130). I also understand that the subject documents represent valuable, proprietary and confidential business information of TIA and its members. I hereby certify that this information will be controlled and will only be further disclosed, exported, or transferred according to the terms of the ITAR. ______________________________ _____________________________ Signature Date ______________________________ _____________________________ Printed Name Witness ______________________________ _____________________________ Title Printed Name of Witness [End NDA]

1 0