December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Hey Baby! XOXOXOXO
by Resources International, Inc. 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Click Here 18 and over only!

1 0

Wassenaar
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Arrgh. Have been comparing what I received via my FOIA request with what other people have extracted and it looks like ACDA's response was incomplete. (In particular, it appears from <http://www.barrier-free.co.jp/a2z/c/CRYPTON/box1997/19970310-1-wassenaar-cat .2.html>, also at <http://www.jya.com/wassnr52.htm> that Appendix 5 is *not* empty.) So it's back to the FOIA salt mines for me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQEVAgUBM0dem/37pMWUJFlhAQEziAf/Ucj4as/l1wtemzNATKBpEn1x7llAtv/k xsDdDoHYJh0iMevtonKSsEolBK7IGFTNpNQjpBwsy9SFXCumOxeoR/P8qUMrrB5e Wsit3OirO9yJszHrFCR6xVAU7sBOSkuT+iQpmw0/KlvlyVu3xtMaev8uBF96bFxu rM/CK/+tZDU0fmRyUNVtlF9UhqWhQajDumbbvC0qG67ZS5028GtvqfJkC8J1r2J/ +1Dv2DZYTJl9eC44wQV2+cL/j7+NhtnTdf504s7tc1wQqO8mMqE5ndE0SWCXh/Q9 LAqDaxzf5uwkHPPdKswLZiWXjQozZD6EOAIagFWsmMr9YBXj9fWLHA== =FBvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell: gbroiles(a)netbox.com | http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto. |

1 0

Secure checksums
by nobody＠huge.cajones.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timmy May the self-admitted child molester possesses a rudimentary dick less than one inch long, half the size of his mother's clitoris, that barely makes a fistful. Thereby hangs the root of this Jew-hating sissy's sick fixation on little boys and Usenet forgeries. o-:^>___? Timmy May `~~c--^c'

2 1

Privacy-Shell Archive at Rivertown
by Alec 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>X-Sender: supportptech(a)mail.ptech.simplenet.com >Date: Sun, 06 Apr 1997 00:15:07 -0500 >To: privacy-shell(a)s1.net >From: PI Tech Support <support(a)ptech.simplenet.com> >Subject: Privacy-Shell Archive at Rivertown >Sender: owner-privacy-shell(a)s1.net >Reply-To: privacy-shell(a)s1.net > >Hello Everyone: > > Thanks to the efforts of Fred Ringel, the Privacy-Shell >Mailing List will be archived on a weekly basis at the following URL: > > http://pgp.rivertown.net/PI-List/ > > Hopefully, the archive can provide PI users with an >additional source of help for PI-related questions/problems. > > Additionally, some subscribers to Privacy-Shell may not know >about the wealth of PGP-related resources available at Fred's PGP-Users >Web site. If you have not visited there, please visit the following URL: > > http://pgp.rivertown.net/ > >Best Wishes, > >Barry Cox >To remove yourself from this mailing list, send a message to >privacy-shell-request(a)s1.net. In the body of the message put the >word unsubscribe. To view the list archive, point your web browser to >http://pgp.rivertown.net/PI-List/ >

1 0

Re: [PGP-USERS] New International Version
by Alec 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Resent-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 21:19:13 -0500 >Resent-From: pgp-users-request(a)rivertown.net >From: patm(a)connix.com (Pat McCotter) >To: pgp-users(a)rivertown.net >Date: Sat, 05 Apr 1997 21:19:03 -0500 >Reply-To: patm(a)connix.com (Pat McCotter) >Resent-Message-ID: <"1mPwfB.A.BzH.ggwRz"@rivertown> >X-Mailing-List: <pgp-users(a)rivertown.net> archive/latest/2272 >X-Loop: pgp-users(a)rivertown.net >Resent-Sender: pgp-users-request(a)rivertown.net >Subject: Re: [PGP-USERS] New International Version > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >On Sat, 5 Apr 1997 18:38:08 -0500 (EST), GWNapier(a)aol.com wrote: > >:I have heard that there is new international verison of PGP out. Anyone know >:about it? > >PGP 2.6.3in >If you can read German, it's here: > http://www.in-ca.individual.net/ > ftp://ftp.iks-jena.de/pub/mitarb/lutz/crypt/software/pgp/ > >Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz(a)iks-jena.de> has said if I know a good >English/German speaking person, he will send them the web texts for >translation and then post them. I don't. Does anybody here? > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: 2.6.3a >Charset: cp850 > >iQEVAwUBM0cHmAhAaMnUN7LZAQHJnAf+N4NlzCEVd5A1/TUhwUGNJEbNdqEI7mXG >OHAX5H22iwjkVKMMx0uPTQ+VTmdiODW1DtDy3EgWUjzcxTX0xFOuEy3v948JG3qe >pHC00EVpHzUZOzgbFc0B1ejePhhxhAAVprRCXeZT2G6b2u9bS34SH1kTy8+QCgxe >crfh2z51eKKTH9ghAX3MvKqRP1S12i5jdMMcPsPhtPw/fEQH25+f64mJ6GxXWK9X >R2FYwoNfXgA/pYnIj0z00PairsL5DGgkw4N/12yF0Kh7mnVw3+KO8cCe6+BWb0FL >UPZ4akdw1v7vrIQC92GPADtUUW68hgpj3WW9p+bhLFHqpZKC2TnURQ== >=AlTX >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >-- >Pat McCotter >Finger for public key patm(a)connix.com or get it from the servers >Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID >pub 2047/D437B2D9 1996/05/10 Pat McCotter <patm(a)connix.com> >Key fingerprint = D0 E7 C6 5A 9E EF 0D CF C7 10 88 2A 73 41 11 24

1 0

Re: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
by David Gilchrist 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 01:33 AM 4/6/97 -0600, you wrote: >The Limey Apologist said: >> > At 1:51 PM -0600 4/4/97, null(a)myemail.net wrote: >> them as a sovereign nation that was the spark to the flame. Try >> reading "Lies my teacher told me" sometime. >> Given that the American revolution institutionalised slavery and > > I think slavery was an institution long before the White Man >came to the New World. If I remember correctly, slavery wasn't outlaws >in england until long after the United States was a soverign contry. > >> lead to the theft of Indian land, and the French revolution the murder of > > If the indians didn't believe that _they_ owned the land, and infact >didn't have the concept of land ownership, how could it have been "stolen"? The concept is that of preservation and use by all. The government denied the Indian the use of the land through eminent domain, encroachment or force which is the government's way of taking, not stealing, what it wants: a distinction without a difference. I agree with your other points. > >> People are not fit judges of their own cause. The civil war was started >> by the South who believed that the North might infringe their "right" >> to own others as property. > > Actually, the "symptom" was slavery, the disease was federal >intrusion into the area of states rights. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBM0ghjm2v/EZLD6bhAQF+fQP+JEH3lo7ash6V24f+6ncAcTouSlRhqtmM QKPfLUBD6+kR4AjPGl8RKZ5x9U1BR6tiZhNrjNb+7x9mNkGqBhhujU4picef4S3T VidsE27jVsLdonti5yQqhDM9XE9U2GtC+FIWrSRwhCioJthIJVNYzogcLY5FnI6f SoF1JvoDi2o= =exxJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- David

1 0

WebWorld 28
by Bubba Rom Dos 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Re: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

snow <snow(a)smoke.suba.com> writes: > The Limey Apologist said: > > > At 1:51 PM -0600 4/4/97, null(a)myemail.net wrote: > > them as a sovereign nation that was the spark to the flame. Try > > reading "Lies my teacher told me" sometime. > > Given that the American revolution institutionalised slavery and > > I think slavery was an institution long before the White Man > came to the New World. If I remember correctly, slavery wasn't outlaws > in england until long after the United States was a soverign contry. A couple of weeks ago I and the family were in Washington DC and we dropped by the Museum of Natural History in the Mall. It's almost as cool at the Museum of Natural History in NYC. One of the things I noticed was a special "braining club" used by the Pacific North West indians. As some readers may know, PNW indians did not believe in accumulating wealth. Rather, they tried to build "reputation capital" (a la Timmy May) by conspiciously destroying wealth in ceremonies known as "potlatch". One indian would, say, publicly burn 10 sacks of grain. Another would try to outdo him by publicly burning 20 sacks of grain. (Somehow, this sounds like Cypherpunks.) Now, one of the ways indians showed off their wealth was by killing their slaves during the potlatches using this braining club. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0

Re: AP Revisited
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Mike Duvos wrote: > In a world with an indestructible Net, anonymous digital cash, > and strong privacy tools, AP will ultimately evolve, first in a > relatively benign form and then, once it becomes ubiquitous, in > the form envisioned by Bell. {excerpt from WebWorld 24} "Assassination Politics," originated by Jim Bell, had been just a theoretical exercise during his lifetime, dismissed by most who read it as a thinly veiled joke, at best. Bell, however, had developed a workable autobot which instituted his system, albeit in a very rudimentary way. Basically, his procedure was analogous to a lottery system where the players were contributing to a prize that could be collected, not by chance, but by anyone who fulfilled the preconditions of those contributing. And the precondition was that, in order to pocket the 'prize', one had to assassinate the person targeted by the contributors. Since Bell's system used anonymous remailers, his system would allow individuals and groups to anonymously defend themselves from all types of aggression. Eventually someone modified Bell's 'Assassination Bot' to serve as a useful tool for political polling. Someone else took it a step further, and it became a valid electoral tool. Then, inevitably, just before the Channel Revolution broke out, it's newly refined features were once again modified to serve Bell's original purpose, and all hell broke loose when established geo-political figures began dropping like flies, or resigning in terror when they realized that the people were indeed speaking, and doing so by putting a price on the heads of their oppressors.

1 0

Re: Crypto Dongel
by Dave Emery 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hal Finney wrote : > However if the system is designed to make it easy when it does become > necessary, it will probably be easy to at least occasionally activate the > feature accidentally. The result will be the loss of your keys. For what little it is worth, key zeroization is built into almost all US government crypto gear, usually with prominent switches on the front panel marked "zeroize" for emergencies. And most all of this gear has tamper switches that activate the zeroizing logic when any of the covers of the equipment are removed - and often there is more than one zeroize circuit in a system in case the primary one fails to work. My understanding is that the NSA has rather specific and detailed requirements for this feature in gear being designed for them, and one can certainly see why it would be a requirement in military systems that might have to be quickly rendered useless to an enemy in the moments before capture. So it is hardly a new idea. Dave Emery die(a)die.com

1 0