December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Netscape 5 will be GPL'ed
by root 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

[Press Releases] http://www.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease558.html?cp=nws01flh1 NETSCAPE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO MAKE NEXT-GENERATION COMMUNICATOR SOURCE CODE AVAILABLE FREE ON THE NET BOLD MOVE TO HARNESS CREATIVE POWER OF THOUSANDS OF INTERNET DEVELOPERS; COMPANY MAKES NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR AND COMMUNICATOR 4.0 IMMEDIATELY FREE FOR ALL USERS, SEEDING MARKET FOR ENTERPRISE AND NETCENTER BUSINESSES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (January 22, 1998) -- Netscape Communications Corporation (NASDAQ: NSCP) today announced bold plans to make the source code for the next generation of its highly popular Netscape Communicator client software available for free licensing on the Internet. The company plans to post the source code beginning with the first Netscape Communicator 5.0 developer release, expected by the end of the first quarter of 1998. This aggressive move will enable Netscape to harness the creative power of thousands of programmers on the Internet by incorporating their best enhancements into future versions of Netscape's software. This strategy is designed to accelerate development and free distribution by Netscape of future high-quality versions of Netscape Communicator to business customers and individuals, further seeding the market for Netscape's enterprise solutions and Netcenter business. In addition, the company is making its currently available Netscape Navigator and Communicator Standard Edition 4.0 software products immediately free for all users. With this action, Netscape makes it easier than ever for individuals at home, at school or at work to choose the world's most popular Internet client software as their preferred interface to the Internet. "The time is right for us to take the bold action of making our client free - and we are going even further by committing to post the source code for free for Communicator 5.0," said Jim Barksdale, Netscape's president and chief executive officer. "By giving away the source code for future versions, we can ignite the creative energies of the entire Net community and fuel unprecedented levels of innovation in the browser market. Our customers can benefit from world-class technology advancements; the development community gains access to a whole new market opportunity; and Netscape's core businesses benefit from the proliferation of the market-leading client software." Netscape plans to make Netscape Communicator 5.0 source code available for modification and redistribution beginning later this quarter with the first developer release of the product. The company will handle free source distribution with a license which allows source code modification and redistribution and provides for free availability of source code versions, building on the heritage of the GNU Public License (GPL), familiar to developers on the Net. Netscape intends to create a special Web site service where all interested parties can download the source code, post their enhancements, take part in newsgroup discussions, and obtain and share Communicator-related information with others in the Internet community. Netscape will also continue to develop new technologies and offer periodic certified, high-quality, supported releases of its Netscape Communicator and Navigator products, incorporating some of the best features created by this dynamic community. The ubiquity of Netscape's client software facilitates Netscape's strategy of linking millions of individuals to businesses. Today's announcements will help to further proliferate Netscape's award-winning client software which today has an installed base of more than 68 million, providing a ready market for businesses using Netscape's Networked Enterprise software solutions and Netscape Netcenter services. Netscape's research indicates that in the education market where Netscape's products are free, the Netscape client software commands approximately 90 percent share, indicating that users tend to choose Netscape when the choice is freely available. Making its browser software free also will enable Netscape to continue to drive Internet standards, maximize the number of users on the Internet, and expand the third-party community of companies and products that take advantage of the Netscape software platform. Netscape has successfully shifted its business over the past year toward enterprise software sales and to revenues from its Web site business, and away from standalone client revenues. In the third quarter of 1997, standalone client revenues represented approximately 18 percent of Netscape's revenue, with the rest coming from enterprise software, services and the Web site. Preliminary results for the fourth quarter of 1997, which Netscape announced January 5, show standalone client revenues decreased to approximately 13 percent in the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 1996 by comparison, standalone client revenue represented approximately 45 percent of Netscape's revenue. In conjunction with its free client, Netscape separately announced today that it is launching a host of enhanced products and services that leverage its free client software to make it easy for enterprise and individual customers to adopt Netscape solutions. The new products and services reinforce Netscape's strategy of leveraging market penetration of its popular client software and its busy Internet site to seed further sales of Netscape software solutions in the home and business markets. The new products and services include enhanced subscription and support packages, an investment protection program for Netscape Communicator users, new reduced pricing on Netscape's retail and enterprise client products, new Premium Services on its Netscape Netcenter online service and Netscape SuiteSpot server software upgrades featuring Netscape client software. In addition, the company separately announced the launch of an aggressive new software distribution program called "Unlimited Distribution" to broadly distribute its market-leading Internet client software for free. Unlimited Distribution enables Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), telecommunications companies, Web content providers, publishers and software developers to download and redistribute Netscape Communicator and Netscape Navigator easily with "no strings attached." In addition, beginning immediately, individual users can download Netscape Communicator or Navigator for free, register for Netscape Netcenter and, beginning tomorrow, enter the Choose Netscape Sweepstakes to win exciting travel-related prizes including a grand prize of two all-inclusive, seven-night tropical resort vacations. Individuals can download a free copy of Netscape Communicator client software or the Netscape Navigator browser from the Netscape home page at http://home.netscape.com, or by clicking on any of the thousands of "Netscape Now" buttons on the Internet. Netscape Communicator Professional Edition, which adds features for enterprise customers, will be available for US$29. Netscape Communications Corporation is a premier provider of open software for linking people and information over enterprise networks and the Internet. The company offers a full line of Netscape Navigator clients, servers, development tools and commercial applications to create a complete platform for next-generation, live online applications. Traded on NASDAQ under the symbol "NSCP," Netscape Communications Corporation is based in Mountain View, California. Additional information on Netscape Communications Corporation is available on the Internet at http://home.netscape.com, by sending email to info(a)netscape.com or by calling 650/937-2555 (corporate customers) or 650/937-3777 (individuals). Netscape is a trademark of Netscape Communications Corporation, which is registered in the United States and other jurisdictions. Netscape Communications, the Netscape Communications logo, Netscape Navigator, Netscape SuiteSpot, Netscape Composer, Netscape Messenger and Netscape Communicator are trademarks of Netscape Communications Corporation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Corporate Sales: 650/937-2555 · Corporate Renewal Sales: 650/937-2929 · Personal Sales: 650/937-3777 · Government Sales: 650/937-3678 · Education Sales: 650/937-2810 If you have any questions, please visit Customer Service, or contact your nearest sales office. Copyright © 1998 Netscape Communications Corporation. This site powered by Netscape SuiteSpot servers.

10 12

toc.htm
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR SEARCHING AND SEIZING COMPUTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION I. KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS A. DEFINITIONS B. LIST OF COMPUTER SYSTEM COMPONENTS C. DETERMINING THE COMPUTER'S ROLE IN THE OFFENSE II. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. SEARCH WARRANTS B. PLAIN VIEW C. EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES D. BORDER SEARCHES E. CONSENT SEARCHES 1. Scope of the Consent 2. Third-Party Consent a. General Rules b. Spouses c. Parents d. Employers e. Networks: System Administrators F. INFORMANTS AND UNDERCOVER AGENTS III. SEIZING HARDWARE A. THE INDEPENDENT COMPONENT DOCTRINE B. HARDWARE AS CONTRABAND OR FRUITS OF CRIME 1. Authority for Seizing Contraband or Fruits of Crime 2. Contraband and Fruits of Crime Defined C. HARDWARE AS AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE OFFENSE 1. Authority for Seizing Instrumentalities 2. Instrumentalities Defined D. HARDWARE AS EVIDENCE OF AN OFFENSE 1. Authority for Seizing Evidence 2. Evidence Defined E. TRANSPORTING HARDWARE FROM THE SCENE IV. SEARCHING FOR AND SEIZING INFORMATION A. INTRODUCTION B. INFORMATION AS CONTRABAND C. INFORMATION AS AN INSTRUMENTALITY D. INFORMATION AS EVIDENCE 1. Evidence of Identity 2. Specific Types of Evidence a. Hard Copy Printouts b. Handwritten Notes E. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1. In General a. Doctors, Lawyers, and Clergy b. Publishers and Authors 2. Targets 3. Using Special Masters F. UNDERSTANDING WHERE THE EVIDENCE MIGHT BE: STAND-ALONE PCs, NETWORKS AND FILE-SERVERS, BACKUPS, ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS, AND ELECTRONIC MAIL 1. Stand-Alone PCs a. Input/Output Devices: Do Monitors, Modems, Printers, and Keyboards Ever Need to be Searched? b. Routine Data Backups 2. Networked PCs a. Routine Backups b. Disaster Backups G. SEARCHING FOR INFORMATION 1. Business Records and Other Documents 2. Data Created or Maintained by Targets 3. Limited Data Searches 4. Discovering the Unexpected a. Items Different from the Description in the Warrant b. Encryption H. DECIDING WHETHER TO CONDUCT THE SEARCH ON-SITE OR TO REMOVE HARDWARE TO ANOTHER LOCATION 1. Seizing Computers because of the Volume of Evidence a. Broad Warrant Authorizes Voluminous Seizure of Documents b. Warrant is Narrowly Drawn but Number of Document to be Sifted through is Enormous c. Warrant Executed in the Home d. Applying Existing Rules to Computers 2. Seizing Computers because of Technical Concerns a. Conducting a Controlled Search to Avoid Destroying Data b. Seizing Hardware and Documentation so the System Will Operate at the Lab I. EXPERT ASSISTANCE 1. Introduction 2. Finding Experts a. Federal Sources b. Private Experts (1) Professional Computer Organizations (2) Universities (3) Computer and Telecommunications Industry Personnel (4) The Victim 3. What the Experts Can Do a. Search Planning and Execution b. Electronic Analysis c. Trial Preparation d. Training for Field Agents V. NETWORKS AND BULLETIN BOARDS A. INTRODUCTION B. THE PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT, 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa 1. A Brief History of the Privacy Protection Act 2. Work Product Materials 3. Documentary Materials 4. Computer Searches and the Privacy Protection Act a. The Reasonable Belief Standard b. Similar Form of Public Communication c. Unique Problems: Unknown Targets and Commingled Materials 5. Approval of Deputy Assistant Attorney General Required C. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS VI. DRAFTING THE WARRANT A. DRAFTING A WARRANT TO SEIZE HARDWARE B. DRAFTING A WARRANT TO SEIZE INFORMATION 1. Describing the Place to be Searched a. General Rule: Obtain a Second Warrant b. Handling Multiple Sites within the Same District c. Handling Multiple Sites in Different Districts d. Information at an Unknown Site e. Information/Devices Which Have Been Moved 2. Describing the Items to be Seized 3. Removing Hardware to Search Off-Site: Ask th Magistrate for Explicit Permission. 4. Seeking Authority for a No-Knock Warrant a. In General b. In Computer-Related Cases VII. POST-SEARCH PROCEDURES A. INTRODUCTION B. PROCEDURES FOR PRESERVING EVIDENCE 1. Chain of Custody 2. Organization 3. Keeping Records 4. Returning Seized Computers and Materials a. Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Rule 41(e) b. Hardware c. Documentation d. Notes and Papers e. Third-Party Owners VIII. EVIDENCE A. INTRODUCTION B. THE BEST EVIDENCE RULE C. AUTHENTICATING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS 1. "Distinctive" Evidence 2. Chain of Custody 3. Electronic Processing of Evidence D. THE HEARSAY RULE IX. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SAMPLE COMPUTER LANGUAGE FOR SEARCH WARRANTS 1. Tangible Objects a. Justify Seizing the Objects b. List and Describe the Objects (1) Hardware (2) Software (3) Documentation (4) Passwords and Data Security Devices 2. Information: Records, Documents, Data a. Describe the Content of Records, Documents, or other Information b. Describe the Form which the Relevant Information May Take c. Electronic Mail: Searching and Seizing Data from a BBS Server under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (1) If All the E-Mail is Evidence of Crime (2) If Some of the E-Mail is Evidence of Crime (3) If None of the E-Mail is Evidence of Crime d. Ask Permission to Seize Storage Devices when Off-Site Search is Necessary e. Ask Permission to Seize, Use, and Return Auxiliary Items, as Necessary f. Data Analysis Techniques 3. Stipulation for Returning Original Electronic Data APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY APPENDIX C: FEDERAL EXPERTS FOR COMPUTER CRIME INVESTIGATIONS APPENDIX D: COMPUTER SEARCH AND SEIZURE WORKING GROUP APPENDIX E: STATUTORY POPULAR NAME TABLE APPENDIX F: TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Statutes Federal Rules Federal Regulations Legislative History Reference Materials Go to . . . CCIPS Home || Justice Home Page _________________________________________________________________ Updated page May 9 , 1997 usdoj-jmd/irm/css/mlb _________________________________________________________________

1 0

Re: On the LAM--Local Area Mixes (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 21:29:55 -0500 (EST) > From: Ryan Anderson <ryan(a)michonline.com> > Subject: Re: On the LAM--Local Area Mixes (fwd) > On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Jim Choate wrote: > > > Are police considered an extension of the judicial or the executive arm of > > the government? > > In theory, executive. (That way legislative writes laws, executive > decides if they want to enforce them, judicial decides if they're legal or > not.. ) In theory, of course.. First, I knew the answer, I was looking for a lead-in...thanks. Then how, Constitutionaly speaking, do they have get the responsbility to search when it is clearly a judicial responsibility (that is where it is in the Constitution) and in cases such as Evans -v- Gore the Supreme Court has found that the judicial body can't transfer or relinquish it's responsibilities even if it *wants* to? I suspect that, again Constitutionaly speaking, the only system that would pass strict muster would be something similar to the Dutch which prohibit the police from executing a search until *after* review by a legislative representative. This is a rhetorical question, I don't expect you or anyone else to respond to it. Just think about it... ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, | | but the desire to edit somebody elses words. | | | | Sign in Ed Barsis' office | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

Re: (eternity) Re: Eternity Services
by redgod＠usa.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FUCK! WHO REGISTER ME TO THIS MAILING LIST? CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO REMOVE MYSELF FROM IT? I WILL MAD! OH GOD! TOO MANY EMAIL! At 08:18 AM 1/12/98 +0100, Lucky Green wrote: >On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ryan Lackey wrote: >[quoting Tim] >> >> > (* I say "working" in the sense that the concept was very easy to >> > demonstrate just by using PGP and remailers. Not much more than what I >> > demonstrated in 1993 would be needed to deploy a real system. Except for >> > one thing: true digital cash. Not the bullshit one-way-traceable stuff that >> > Chaum and others are now pushing, but the original, online-cleared or >> > escrow-cleared form, a la the work of Goldberg et. al. For some of these >> > applications, below, simple token- or coupon-based schemes might work >> > adequately.) >> >> There are currently-under-development systems which will meet the digital cash >> requirement, >> from people who I consider highly respectable and competent. > >And the demand for such ecash systems is real. I personally carried a $10 >million offer for a non-exclusive license for the blind signature patent >to David Chaum. He declined the offer. "The patent is not for license". >DigiCash's CEO since March of last year, Mike Nash, also told me that >DigiCash was not considering licensing the patent. I knew that day that it >was time to quit. Not surprisingly, nobody heard from DigiCash since. > >-- Lucky Green <shamrock(a)cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred. > "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?" > >

3 2

Re: (eternity) Service denial attacks on Eternity
by redgod＠usa.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FUCK! WHO REGISTER ME TO THIS MAILING LIST? CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO REMOVE MYSELF FROM IT? I WILL MAD! OH GOD! TOO MANY EMAIL! At 04:51 PM 1/12/98 +0000, Ross Anderson wrote: >Tim May wrote: > >> It is also likely in the extreme that a working Eternity service will >> quickly be hit with attackers of various sorts who want to test the limits >> of the service, or who want such services shut down. > >Exactly. When I first talked about Eternity, which was at either the >1994 or 1995 protocols workshop, I was walking back to my seat when >Bob Morris (then at the NSA) said, from behind his hand in a stage >whisper, `Kiddyporn!' > >Adam Back added: > >> the spooks / feds have a history of posting their own child porn if >> none is available to seize > >Indeed, and a decade or so ago there was a scandal when it turned out >that the spooks were using the Kincora Boys' Home in Belfast as a pedo >brothel in order to entrap various local politicians. For them to say >now that they need key escrow to suppress Kiddyporn is a bit rich! > >However the main threat is the court order - Anton Pillar or whatever >- and the best weapon against court orders is anonymity. If they don't >know your address they can't serve you the order or arrest you for >contempt. > >Tom Womack: > >> I can imagine *use* of the service becoming a felony > >I mentioned in the paper that Mossad might deny Eternity service to >the Muslim world by posting something rude about the Prophet Mohammed. > >One must of course create a lawful excuse for people to have Eternity >software mounted on their system. Maybe in addition to the `public' >Eternity service we should have many corporate or even private >services, many of which have escrow capabilities and are thus clearly >law-abiding and accountable :-) > >There are many other possibilities. One topic that oozes into my >consciousness from time to time is that one might integrate covert >communications and storage with an anti-spam mail program - maybe a >natural way forward if Adam hides Eternity traffic in spam! > >Tim again: > >> Great idea, but where are the customers? > >Some 90% of security research effort is on confidentiality, 9% on >authenticity and 1% on availability. Corporate infosec expenditures >are exactly the other way round, and tools to enable disaster recovery >databases to be spread holographically over a company's PCs could save >a fortune compared with the cost of some current arrangements. If a >few of these backup resources have hidden directories that mount the >public Eternity service, then who can tell? > >At the Info Hiding Workshop at Portland in April, I will present a new >idea which may facilitate such implementations of Eternity. This is >the Steganographic File System - designed to provide you with any file >whose name and password you know. If you don't know this combination, >then you can't even tell that the file is there. We do not need to >make any assumptions about tamper resistance; it can be done using >suitable mathematics. (This is joint work with Roger Needham and Adi >Shamir.) > >Ross > >PS: we need a better word for `eternityspace', and Bell Labs have >already trademarked `Inferno'. So what - Nirvana? Valhalla? >

2 1

Re: (eternity) autonomous agents
by redgod＠usa.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

FUCK! WHO REGISTER ME TO THIS MAILING LIST? CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO REMOVE MYSELF FROM IT? I WILL MAD! OH GOD! TOO MANY EMAIL! At 03:51 PM 1/13/98 -0800, William Knowles wrote: >On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Tim May wrote: > >> At 1:23 PM -0800 1/13/98, William Knowles wrote: >> >> >Anguilla seems to be a doing agood job on becoming a country >> >willing on hosting data havens. >> >> Oh yeah? >> >> It's been a while since we talked about this (at least on the Cypherpunks >> list), but a couple of years ago there was much discusson on the CP list >> about just what items would be allowable in Anguilla. Vince Cate gave his >> assessment, which I found fairly nebulous, in that it appeared the Ruling >> Families would allow what they would allow, and not allow what they would >> not allow---there seemed to be a lot of ad hoc rulings. > >If memory serves me right it was because Vince bounced off the Taxbomber >site because it offered second passports, camouflage passports, and other >products that was considered a fraud, Which to me sounds odd since there >is some other company selling most everthing and then some from an .ai >domain which Vince's company has the monopoly on handing out .ai domains > >http://www.ultramec.com.ai > >> (Given that copies of "Penthouse" are illegal in Anguilla, if I recall this >> correctly, and given that gun are illegal, and drugs are illegal, I rather >> doubt that Anguilla would happily host "The Aryan Nations Bomb Site," or >> "Pedophile Heaven," or "Gun Smuggler's Digest. " Or the even juicier stuff >> any "data haven" with any claim to really being a data haven will surely >> have.) > >You also have to wonder how far in the future it will be before the >special forces of some banana republic drops in on Vince to blow-up >his operation for as he advertises publishing censored information >on ones ex-president on the Internet, or for that matter I have >yet to see abortion information coming from his servers. > >What has happened in Anguilla proves that there will be a need for >different flavors of datahavens, Different degrees libility that >datahaven owners will want to store information on their servers. >I would love to open a XXX WWW site in Anguilla pulling in the >industry average of $5-10K a month and not pay any taxes there, >But it won't happen in Anguilla with the present adminstration! > >> >And there are likely under a hundred oil companies looking >> >for firms to 'recycle' their old oil platforms and drilling >> >rigs wasting away around the world, I'm sure some might just >> >give you one just to be rid of future liability. >> >> Given the willingness of the French to have SDECE sink Greenpeace ships in >> neutral ports, how long before a couple of kilos of Semtex are applied to >> the underside of these oil rigs? >> >> Given what happened with "pirate broadcast tankers," the future is not bright. > >Isn't there a microstate off the coast of England called 'Sealand' run >from a former oil rig/gun battery for the last 20 years? > >> When the first "oil rig data haven" is found to have kiddie porn, >> bomb-making info, and (shudder) material doubting the historicity of the >> Holocaust, the U.N. will cluck and the public will cheer when it is boarded >> and seized, or simply sunk. >> >> As I said in my last piece on this subject, there is no security in >> meatspace comparable to what is gotten with mathematics. >> >> --Tim May > >I agree completely, But there is still room for massively distrubted >datahavens on oil rigs, barges, gun batteries, island nations or >hiding in Norm's LAN in Cicero IL. All the harder to supress that >information. > > >William Knowles >erehwon(a)dis.org > >== >The information standard is more draconian than the gold >standard, because the government has lost control of the >marketplace. -- Walter Wriston >== >http://www.dis.org/erehwon/ > >

1 0

Re: SC rules 1st doesn't cover lies [CNN] (fwd)
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>So you have to be an employee of the government to be a citizen? Yes. Welcome to America, Land of the Freeh.

1 0

Supplement to DoJ Seizure Guide
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

There's a long October 1997 supplement to the 1994 DoJ Guide to Search and Seizure of Computers for which Jim Choate posted the TOC just now. It reflects recent campaigns, raids and counterattacks as the battle for supremacy between law and technology intensifies and both sides search and seize each's best and worst: http://jya.com/doj-ssgsup.htm (100K)

1 0

FW: Symantec Norton, Your Eyes Only.
by Pearson Shane 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anyone? > -----Original Message----- > From: Pearson Shane > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 1998 1:25 PM > To: 'cypherpunks(a)toad.com' > Subject: Symantec Norton, Your Eyes Only. > > > Hey all, > > Just wondering what people think of this product? > Good, bad or ugly? > > Is there an international version and a US version? > > If so, what limitations are in the international version? > > Many thanks...

2 1

Censorship free ISP
by White Liberty 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Sorry for the cross-posting, but some of the readers may hopefully address this: Could you recommend me a censorship FREE InterNet Service Provider that in addition to a "no censorship" policy also guarantees your privacy. I am an ex-patriate Danish who live in the United States, but has a friend who wants to publish material deemed hateful in my birth country. In Denmark, they still struggle with laws abridging freedom of expression in regard to "hate speech." Could you recommend any ISP to me in the United States that satisfies this? I know Cyberpass in California does not censor based on content. But I am sure there are many many others. Please respond in personal mail or to cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net.

1 0