September 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

CNN.com - U.S. warned in 1995 of plot to hijack planes, attack buildings - September 18, 2001
by Jim Choate 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/18/inv.hijacking.philippines/index.html -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ Drop acid, not bombs..............1960's Anti-war Slogan The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

SIG: The Register - Terror attacks usher in copy controlled hardware
by Jim Choate 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

Terrorism == Copyright infringement? Hollings needs to take a piss test... http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/21736.html -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ Drop acid, not bombs..............1960's Anti-war Slogan The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: Hey! I've Got A Good Idea...
by mmotyka＠lsil.com 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

Heavy Stuff. Puts to shame my GoodIdea of handing a basket of Official Major League Baseballs to each airline passenger upon boarding. Let's see a homicidal maniac with a toenail clipper stand up to that. Mike

1 0

ghost of steve jackson
by Subcommander Bob 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

And Microsoft has postponed the October launch of its latest version of "Flight Simulator," which offers the ability to fly into buildings. http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAPD9W4SRC.html Well I feel much safer now.

1 0

Hey! I've Got A Good Idea...
by CJ Parker 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

[ReVisionIst RealIty gNutly gNus 09-13-01] Osama Been Bomb'in - Your Tax Dollars At Work --------------------------------------------- Precedent Bush, like all his FourFlushers in the Offal Oafish, is so concerned about the Safety of the %itizenry (EwE & Me) that he has asked for $20 Billion to Protect U$ (EwE & Me) from the Criminal Terrorist MadMen that were Trained by the CIA (using the TaxDollar$ that We (eWe & Me) were ShakenDown4 in order to Protect Us&OR&U.S. from PreviousThreats To Our Safety [e.g. Manuel Noriega] that were Created&OR&Supported by TaxDollar$ previously Squeezed from the Pulp Faction of $itizenry in order to...ad infinituuuuuummmm...). SitOnItOrs and CongressWithGoatsMen around Ameri%a ['%' Is4Swastika] are crying out for WeTheSheeple 2B to be SubjectEd to EverMore Intrusive&OR&Oppressive levels and types of Monitoring and Invasions of Privacy, in order to Protect U$ from the Terrorist MadMen that our TaxDollar$ haven't been used to Protect U$ from, thus far, even though over the last couple of decades these TM's (TerroristMadmen, not TruthMongers, nor Tim Mays, Eh?) have: a. Declared War on Ameri$a b. Said they were going to Destroy Ameri%a c. Attacked and killed Americans d. Been Elusive&OR&UnFindAble to all of our Intelligence Agencies, but not to our News Media or the Pizza Delivery Guy... e. EtAl, AdInfinitUuuhhhMmmm.... The Pentagon, the CIA, the FBI, and every other Military/Security Agency down to and including Park Rangers and Parking Maids, will be crying out for MoreFunding for the Defen$e of the %itizenry (e.g. gNuClear Missles On The Moon To Deter National Park Littering Offenders ["The Best Defense Is A Good Offense"]), without mentioning that the "Attack On Ameri%a" that is Fueling the Current OutCry4BloodLustRevenge could have been prevented merely by *using* a few dozen of the bullets already included in Military and Security Budgets. Across Ameri%a, ThePeopleWhoAllowedThisTo- HappenOnTheirWatchEvenThoughTheyWereWarnedIt- WasComingByThoseWhoDidIt are JoiningTogether in their FirmResolve to PreventItFromEver- HappeningAgain by calling for MoreMoney&OR& Power to be given to ThePeopleWhoAllowedThis- ToHappenOnTheirWatch(IncludingThemSelf)Even- ThoughTheyWereWarnedItWasComingByThoseWhoDidIt. ThoseWhoAllowedThisToHappen have vowed to BombTheLivingShit out of ThoseWhoDidThisAnd- ThoseWhoHarborThem, in order to protect U$, and will be able to follow through on this promise due to the fact that THEY [TM] had SuddenlyRealizedJustWhoThesePeopleAre within Seconds after the "Attack On Ameri%a." The Role&OR&'Rolling' of the %itizenry is to Provide MoreTaxDollar$4MoreMilitaryMight to be used against those who actively show their objection to our using our Strength to Impose Our&OR&EweOr&OR&My Will upon the rest of the world by attacking U.$.&OR&EWE&OR&ME. MainStreamDream News Sources will *not* be showing footage of OurSoldiers describing their "blowing away" SomalianMothersWithBabies- InTheirArms, and questioning whether we need to take a look at *our* Role&OR&Responsibility for providing Means&OR&Motive for those who subsequently launch an "Attack On Ameri%a." TheRoyal'We' want to PlayWithGuns, but then TurnAround&ActOffended when Others - aka DastardlyCowardsUsingGunsToOpposeU$ - do so. Now THEY [TM] who Provoked ThoseWhoLaunched the "Attack On Ameri%a" (and who subsequently failed to protect U$ from them, even after numerous warnings) want us to Rally Behind THEM [TM] in MindLessLie Pursuing yet more ViolenceProvokingViolence against whoever THEY [TM] declare to be Responsible for this UnJustifiable Violence (as Opposed to, perhaps, UN-Justifiable Violence, or U$-Justifiable Violence). And GodHelp any %itizenUnit who FailsTo&OR&2 FallIntoLine with the PredictablyProgrammed National[Istic]BloodLustRevengeResponse aimed at [eWeWillSoonB*Informed*Where2DirectYourRage] by engaging in Treacherous Anti-Ameri%an Activities. e.g. - Digging into their 60's wardrobe to ReCycle the T-Shirt proclaiming: "Killing For Peace Is Like Fucking For Virginity" [EditWhore's gNote: Even as this is being written, an OffalSchill MSNBC Analyst is speaking about the "Collateral Damage" (aka Loss Of Civilian Life) that will be "inevetible" in the Ameri%an *JusticeFieAbly* Violent Response to the Affliction of Civilian Casualties upon Ameri%ans.] Only after *OUR* 'Healing Process' begins by 'Inflicting Revenge' on *THEM*, will *(e)We* be able to Calmly&OR&Objectively reflect upon such MeaningBull QuestIons as: a. How the number of Victims of the "Attack On Ameri%a" compares to the number of Agent Orange Victims of the "Attack On Our Own Soldiers." b. How many people's reaction to the Visually Violent Destruction BroadCast WorldWide was: "Wow! Cool..." and whether their numbers are great enough to justify the Immediate Creation of a new Action Movie, starring Bruce Willis, with Toy&OR&Computer/ArcadeGame tie-ins. c. Whether it is InDecent&OR&InSensitive to PointOut the OffalSchill BullShit leading to, encompassing, and following, a Genuine Tragedy where Hundreds of Heroic American People lost their lives rushing into Burning Buildings in an attempt to Rescue their fellow Humans. d. Whether, when all is Said&OR&Done, the Actions&OR&ReActions of the Ameri%an Govern- Mint and the American People will make Future Repeats of "The Attack On Ameri%a" *More*, or *Less*, likely... e. How much Freedom&OR&Liberty will be Wrested from the %itizenUnits, as a result of the "Attack On Ameri%a," in order to 'provide' an UnRealIstic 'Safety' which, according to A (.T.) Great American, has never existed, this side of the grave, and never will. ===== CJ Parker #05987-196 "Proud To Be A Felon In Ameri%a!" __________________________________________________ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/

1 0

YOU CAN OWN AN ADULT SITE AND MAKE HUGE ��/$$$
by maillist＠customers.com 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

Take advantage , get involved with the $35 billion dollar a year adult XXX industry by taking one of our adult web sites business and we'll make sure you earn a lot of money. It's what over 70% of 250'000'000 of surfurs are looking for. Make tens of �1000's without selling, experience, administration, stock, investment or having to answer the phone ever again. Get a "REVOLUTIONARY" money making web site from us and we'll make sure you make A LOT OF MONEY Contact me: puce1957(a)yahoo.com "more info" in subject line, or "remove" if you prefere to be removed from my database.

1 0

crypto law survey questions
by Eric Murray 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

Lots of media are running survey questions asking if the US should ban strong cryptography. Here is a more honest survey: 1. Are you willing to ban strong cryptography so the FBI, CIA, NSA etc. can listen in on potential terrorists, and jail Americans that use strong cryptography? 2. The browser that you're using to read this survey uses strong cryptography. If you answered "yes" to #1, are you ready to go to jail now? 3. Ok, you didn't know that your browser uses cryptography and you're not a terrorist. We won't report you. Are you willing to arrest little old ladies who didn't know that their browser uses crypto? 4. Are you willing to allow hackers to steal your credit card number or medical information or email accounts because they're no longer protected by strong cryptography? 5. How about your banking info? Are you willing to deal with periodically straightening out your bank accounts when hackers break into them because they're no longer protected by strong cryptography? 6. Even if the US banned all strong crypto tommorrow, there would still be many strong crypto programs out in the world, and all the knowledge is readily available (printed in books no less). Would you be willing to allow governments and hackers to read all your communications and personal data, while in the rest of the world they cannot? 7. Terrorists or those associated with them sometimes attack web sites and networks. Are you willing to tolerate more of these sorts of attacks against U.S. digital infrastructure because it's no longer protected with strong cryptography? 8. Criminals, by definition, do not follow laws. Do you think that all criminals are dumb enough to switch back to weak crypto to plan their crimes? 9. Terrorists do not always communicate digitally. In fact there are rumors that Osama bin Laden communicates with his associates either by sending verbal messages with trusted couriers from families that he knows, or for longer distances, using paper messages sent via services like FedEx. Do you think that banning strong crypto in America will slow bin Laden down at all? Eric

1 0

Assistance /Partner
by Jannet Sankoh 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

From : Mrs JENETH SANKOH Abidjan, C�te d'Ivoire West Africa Dear Sir, With due respect and humility I write you this letter which I believe you would be of great assistance to me and my children. I am Mrs JENETH SANKOH, the wife of the late Dr FREDERICK SANKOH of the blessed memory. Priorto my husband assassination by the rebel force loyal to CORPORAL FODAY SANKOH of the revolutionary United Front (RUF), He was the Director general National Gold and Diamond Mining corporation of Sierra-leone. Few days before my husband was assassinated,he instructed me and my children (DIDOW K. SANKOH AND HENRY)to move out of Sierra-Leone and also to go in his underground strong room where the documents of money he has deposited in a security company in Abidjan C�te d'Ivoire in one trunk Box as family valuables and treasures with the name of my first son DODOW K. SANKOH as the beneficiary. The amount is US$12.500,000 (Twelve million five hundred thousand United States Dollars. We managed to escape to Abidjan the Republic of C�te d'Ivoire through the help of my husband's friend who is a trawler. As our travelling document was sized.For your information , the security company did not know the real content of the box and we do not wish them to know until the money is transferred to your account. As it was deposited as family valuables and treasures. Meanwhile, I want to leave C�te d'Ivoire entirely with this money for investment in your country because of the unstable political situation and mostly for the future of my children. I want you to please assist us to claim the box from the security company and also deposit the money in a local account here in your name and order the bank to transfer the money to your account in your country. As our foreign partner for our investment. We have it in mind to reward you with a certain percentage for your assistance. As soon as we hear from you Do not hesitate to give me your word through this E-mail mamasankoh(a)yahoo.com immediately you receive this letter to enable us proceed in Ernest toward retrieving the box and transferring of the money into your account. Finally, Please ensure that no one else knows about this money as it is only myself my son, yourself and the Rev. Pastor of the church where we worship knows about this money.May God bless you as you assist me. yours sincerely. MRS JENETH SANKOH __________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > > > Get email at your own domain with > Yahoo! > > > > Mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! > > > Mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! > > Mail. > > > > > > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > __________________________________________________ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/

1 0

Forbes: The Big Lie
by mean-green＠hushmail.com 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

The Big Lie Forbes.com, 09.17.01, 1:10 PM ET Must Americans sacrifice their liberty to achieve safety? The knee-jerk reaction to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S. has been to say yes. Two out of three Americans are willing to surrender civil liberties to stop terrorism, according to an ABC-Washington Post poll taken the day after the attacks. "I'm puking every time I hear that," says Baltimore lawyer Thomas Bowden. "The idea is to compromise their lifestyle. We keep ours the same." It's also irresponsible to suggest waiving civil rights. Take the bill passed by the Senate two days after the attack. It would permit police to tape phones and seize Internet records without a search warrant. That would leave Americans vulnerable to even greater evils. "It is something we will all regret down the road," says Timothy Lynch, a constitutional law expert with the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Most threatened is the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches. Does that safeguard have to be scrapped to search airline passengers more thoroughly? No, it doesn't. Airports already use machines sensitive enough to detect a box cutter. Luggage and people are already searched, but these searches don't raise constitutional issues, unless a government is involved. The Constitution restricts only official actions, not private ones. Courts agree that people can't expect much privacy in airports anyhow. What about when police are involved? They usually need a search warrant before raiding a home or tapping the phone. But police seldom have trouble persuading a judge to sign one. The standards are lax, especially when a terrorist is involved. This week America Online (nyse: AOL - news - people) and EarthLink (nasdaq: ELNK - news - people) cooperated with the FBI investigation by providing information about certain subscribers, according to the Washington Post. "This is already constitutional," explains lawyer James Harper, a privacy advocate and former counsel to the House Judiciary Committee. So why waive the Fourth Amendment and allow the government to eavesdrop and seize records without a warrant? Is the Justice Department trying to exploit a crisis for illicit purposes? "Sometimes they take advantage of these tragedies," sighs Lynch, citing antiterrorist laws inspired by the bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma City in 1996. Sacrificing rights didn't work then and it's dishonest for law enforcement to pretend that waiving civil rights now will work, either. Even if giving up some rights would help some, Americans shouldn't do it. That would be a victory for the terrorists, who sought to destroy a way of life. Even temporary measures tend to become permanent, as the British have discovered since the 1970s, when they waived some rights to thwart bombings by the Irish Republican Army. Giving up rights might even lead the U.S. into autocratic rule--which is what the terrorists want and what the Founding Fathers were trying to prevent when they wrote the Bill of Rights. America is built on a healthy distrust of government power. In the words of Ben Franklin, "Those who trade liberty for security will have neither."

1 0

Free XXX pics
by samw＠ijustgotfired.com 18 Sep '01

18 Sep '01

*****ADULT INFORMATION***** Hi! If you want get a FREEE XXX pics in your email box (without hours searching through pay sites), just write me at koncert(a)epatra.com with "Send" in Subject line Peter To be removed just write in Subject line - "Remove"

1 0