- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

No Subject
by Mixmaster 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

looking around on various crypto sites I can't find any hashes ported to dos/win that are already compiled is anyone out there aware of a place with a copy o MD5 or SHA1 and my second question, I was also curious about PGP. In the latest version (cyberknights build) You can use 8kbits DH key or a 16Kbits RSA key, In my reasoning I would think that since DH was out before RSA and RSA was chosen for the first releases of PGP why switch to DH now, if it was better why not start out using that?

1 0

Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED!
by anonymous-remailer＠shell.portal.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is the third in a regular series of postings to expose the lie that has become of the Leahy bill. I am proud to report that the majority of us have the good sense to see this for what it is but a few cypherpunks continue to lie to us and have not recanted. It is too late to toss this up as a mistake in judgement. We tried to educate these people on the error of their ways but they persist in spreading the lie that the Leahy bill is good for us. We tried to give them the benefit of the dout, but isn't it funny that when presented with the facts NOT ONE OF THESE ""SCIENTISTS"" has admited to his CLEAR MISTAKE. No, they continue spreading the same lie lie lie that the LEAHEY BILL WILL SOMEHOW HELP US. THEY MUST BE STOPPED. We can be fortunate that their number is small. At least the ones we know about. Only three more since the last report. But even one is too many. These people have alot to answer for. Ask them who they work for and who signs there checks. Ask them why they lie. Ask them why they are afraid of your right to privacy. (of course we know why) Show them HOW WE FEEL. Let them serve as examples too others if they are too cowardly to serve as beacons for truth. THE LIST OF SHAME: B. Schneier: bs208(a)newton.cam.ac.uk, schneier(a)counterpane.com M. Blaze: mab(a)crypto.com, mab(a)research.att.com J. Bizdos: jim(a)rsa.com S. Safaddar: shabbir(a)vtw.org D. Weinstein: djw(a)vplus.com P.. Peterson: padgett(a)hobbes.orl.mmc.com B. Stewart: stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com B. Unicorn: unicorn(a)schloss.li P. Karn: karn(a)unix.ka9q.ampr.org D. McCullagh: declan(a)well.com BOYCOTT APPLIED CRYPTOGRAPHY, AT&T, VTW, and RSA!!!! THE LEAHY BILL IS 100% PART OF THE PLAN TO KILL FREE CRYPTO. YOU DON'T NEED EXPERTS TO THINK FOR YOU! REMEMBER RICO AND WORLD GOVERNMENT!

7 8

reputation capital transaction
by SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In anticipation of the upcoming Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference, I'd like to transfer some reputation capital between accounts. Doug Sinclair <diemos(a)io.org> == The Cunning Artificers I ported RC4 to the HP48 calculator. A bignum package capable of RSA and Diffie-Hellman is coming soon. Doug's key: - -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAy93adEAAAEEAPHAXq0g2lFnn1kE4trrPWCjhiCzxNkjake4W4mspvOCGjd0 MUREgYJm3DVcTn5Ue0FdhSHOVoMoS+jdRV8W6wB/hGUUqyqleKkNSv1/yOAPCzHn Iq74GCRniy0WdO5zlDi56LxH5ruteWl6soPt1n3EeJKRldux7DouNsrtqO6VAAUR tB1Eb3VnIFNpbmNsYWlyIDxkaWVtb3NAaW8ub3JnPokAlQMFEDFNZAjhTVXsPaAX /QEBzZED/icJDAo1cjVp0eRqpelcAurXFqlkcfbvyg76KDHsxsiKthLyzF9UwErE xDxMyG/4rhojiJUoVaIq3MgJ9ZwtpXwkLS0kqXZySPSLsWMXjpzy36tOZ2XcdVFv kVVUy3I0M2nYfO8vT4vZV53VC8vqAKTjuQCt/vhcDrYTZdX0BLLY =t2MG - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- The Cunning Artificers key: - -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzEAEf4AAAEEAMONoLHj5CwKvaM6ch9GOcUjgoVS5sjXa4TzD2ohhtHFYR9l QzNj0vNASBQKE/Mk9Flqg+dtitS7S7B0qZQ+mQmMT73yniun596jt1NCJ5sLBKrM jDvYK3wGbycVX43RBiR3iwJZGq5blfWqNRE7kFdTxgu+bCdtLOFNVew9oBf9AAUR tBZUaGUgQ3VubmluZyBBcnRpZmljZXJz =pf3Y - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMU1k8uFNVew9oBf9AQG/JQP+K0hNzQew5MBOc1TGea+gkvBrTy+O801j 0yb4OrmAfuEQg6TalE7+jKGPoB/y9Ln2eusaZ+JCneBs7oVdvPSlzm/qNOjYXB7m jSxjkp20lzhxU5UBSAWWePbYsvoCe78BFS51OXEZdTuvGnbcKyh8l1DbvEKEML0i rNzbhRCuMDE= =HOSH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

DEC_lan
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

NYT of 3-18-96 has front page story on Internet copyright issues, featuring copywebbing terrorist Declan. DEC_lan

2 1

DESCRIBE
by Leonardo Machado 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

undescribe cypherpunks(a)toad.com cyber(a)ronet.com.br

1 0

16B_uys
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

3-18-96. TWP: "FBI, CIA Try to Set Turf Rules as Bureau Branches Out." The growing FBI overseas contingent is establishing liaison relationships with foreign police and intelligence groups that already have relationships with CIA personnel. The FBI agents abroad also try to develop their own clandestine informants, sometimes recruiting individuals who work for the CIA or have been fired by it. At a gathering Feb. 3-4 in Davos, Switzerland, FBI Director Freeh met with six presidents, seven prime ministers and three foreign ministers. 16B_uys

1 0

Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites
by Phillip M. Hallam-Baker 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [Various holocaust revisionist crap deleted] Don't worry, it will very soon become impossible to block access to anything on the Web. I have a long record of opposing the holocaust revisionists. I have never attempted to prevent them putting their views forward. It is better to expose them and their lies. Winston Smith, Faust and co disappeared after we proved that they were the creations of one Dan Gannon. Attempting to cut off access and the conceit that the truth needs to be legislated merely plays into the facists hands. Any attempt to cut of service can be circumvented simply by connecting to a cache. Hensa in the UK (www.hensa.co.uk ?) run a very large one. There are also many caches run by US universities although for obvious reasons it is preferable for the French to go through a European one. And please, no more anonymous posts trying to persuade us that there is anything worth reading at these hate sites. The literary style is familiar enough that nobody should be fooled. Phill - --- [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the signature and forwarded.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Gratis auto-signing service iQBFAwUBMU2UhSoZzwIn1bdtAQFuqAGAxBfCOiZ1LKPIXLdE7OAJnabXlv1rxShW bW7DwF16+4rjLdm9ZahdS/X0NAMS1Oum =ySHM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: "Contempt" charges likely to increase
by E. ALLEN SMITH 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: IN%"unicorn(a)schloss.li" "Black Unicorn" 13-APR-1996 11:57:34.92 >Are you planning on affording them due process rights? Due Process rights are an interesting question in this regard. One, self-defense goes up against due process, particularly lethal self defense. One liberal justification for various bans or limits on lethal self defense (i.e., those against potentially lethal defense against property crimes - including preventing the criminal from making away with his stolen property) is that the criminal does not get due process. In such a case, it's usually reasonably obvious to the victim that self-defense is necessary, although others (such as, so far as I can tell, in the Goetz case) may not realize it. Two, who's going to apply the trial? As you've noted regarding overturning contempt charges, judges are very rarely willing to consider each other wrong (outside of the realm of appeals), much less sentence each other. Another instance of how judges tend to resist even the appointed mechanisms for removal can be found in the recent judicial commentary regarding a threatened impeachment for another judge; while they were correct in that case, the instance is instructive. This is a common tendency inside the government in general; cops are very loyal to one another, even when they're crooked. Seldom is anyone but an internal body (Internal Affairs) permitted to go after a cop (except with massive opposition by the police department), and even they are hated. >How about a trial, or does it merely take a single bidder with money to have >someone offed? The risk of innocents dying is a valid problem, and is the major reason that I have not "endorsed" assasination politics. The essential question is whether more innocents will die under such a system than do now, or under other proposed (non-violent) alternatives. The latter would be preferable, _if_ they work. As yet, I have hopes that they will; others, such as Mr. Bell, are more pessimistic. >Sounds like tyrrany of the rich to me. Unfortunately, it isn't. I say unfortunately because a tyrrany of the rich would be preferable to the tyrrany of the (incompetent) majority we've got currently; even the provisions in the Bill of Rights are removable by a super-majority. Of course, a tyrrany of no-one at all would be preferable, but I'm not sure if there's any way to do that. >> To whatever extent it exceeds those limits, and to >> whatever extent the public can't get justice to prevent those violations, >> why would the public be obligated to accept them? >Really Mr. Bell has recognized something important, though I'm not sure >even he realizes it. Specifically, that when his allies are so few in >number he must resort to general terrorism and low intensity conflict to >have any hope of success at all. This is essentially the moral problem of ends justifying the means; I do not regard this difficulty as solvable in any provable manner. >> To believe otherwise is to believe that the government has some sort of >> special dispensation to violate the law. I don't believe this; it wouldn't >> surprise me to hear that you do, however. Which is it? >I don't believe anyone has any special dispensation. It's all a question >of who can get away with it. For all your moaning and whining, you are [irrelevant material deleted] Essentially, can we stop _everybody_ from getting away with it, as you put it, or just some people? And if the latter, who should we stop? -Allen

1 0

[fwd] Undeliverable Message
by Clemens Stiglechner 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- It seems that mailer-daemon(a)usafa.af.mil is running amok; it has sent 64 *different* *encrypted* messages to the Hemingway List within 6 hours until now. I just wonder which kind of encryption _they_ might use. Here is the first one: - -----Beginn Forwarded Message----- Sender: owner-heming-l-outgoing(a)mtu.edu Received: from opus.mtu.edu (opus.mtu.edu [141.219.70.3]) by arl-img-4.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id KAA06421; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:17:40 -0400 Received: from mtu.edu (mtu.edu [141.219.70.1]) by opus.mtu.edu (8.6.13/8.6.10) with ESMTP id KAA18535; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:17:37 -0400 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mtu.edu (8.6.13/8.6.10) id KAA06326 for heming-l-outgoing; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:17:15 -0400 Received: from 34trwmail.usafa.af.mil ([128.236.38.1]) by mtu.edu (8.6.13/8.6.10) with SMTP id KAA06314 for <heming-l(a)mtu.edu>; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:17:13 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: mtu.edu: Host [128.236.38.1] claimed to be 34trwmail.usafa.af.mil Received: by 34trwmail.usafa.af.mil; Sun, 14 Apr 96 8:17:03 MDT Date: Sun, 14 Apr 96 8:17:02 MDT Message-ID: <vines.g1Y7+SXEQlA(a)34trwmail.usafa.af.mil> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) To: <heming-l(a)mtu.edu> From: <MAILER-DAEMON(a)usafa.af.mil> Subject: Undeliverable Message X-Incognito-SN: 547 X-Incognito-Format: VERSION=2.01 ENCRYPTED=YES Precedence: list Reply-To: heming-l(a)mtu.edu begin 600 attach.Z M'YV0:=R,>7/&31HZ;URTF7,&@,.'$"-*G$BQHL6+&"N"V&@#!@P0`#:"B$&# M!DB1)$V&%"G2A@T:,CC&F`$3!@V:'T?*B,$S)(R,0(,*'4IT8ITY=,+(V0B` MS9LQ8=@4I>@4JM2I6+-JW<JUJU>L5-[H8$E6)`\T9=H$/-."#9`V=.JX*$.F MC@\%0\:,+4M6P90Z8M24&4-G+]DJ;LB489/&3ADY8<2P*0.B29DY<\*<*:-` M@67,FBF[>4,'A&+&CN70!8$0A.HQ:>"D*>.&SAP08A:_N>-B(Q35F$$8B0'" MS)NE:-G``7'G(!H05IPT4?!8SG$0`Q7/Z<V7;^<$T9O,L#ECKV759)PK00*$ MB)$B3HX`J3(EB)$@"AKD5Q!^_$T0+;1061!),"'$$UB`D,04PE7!!!.=B40% M6B"T<5EFFV$7AANCE9:;:8LU]MAJN4%U%&5TH*6`2*_%-EMM)]S61AAIL"'& M&WA@]T9M-+IQ6XJ4S8A'&FW4T08(;AB9VU)OF`'"BAM9"-IF<[``0ABWS5&& MAWFP1N$<>2"5UI5DJ&404I`A)`=W$W+&XF`NTE9:D4B!.!D=E,WQAH457AC: M;;D9I]J5;N0!)0BDH;64E!A>IJ$;N%%VFHCHN7#HH6U6&,:011[):&@@,*96 M:8)>"<*)<L2H:8TWYIC&;8?&``,+'L'`)H6*F1%&'6S,Z6>&HAX$PJLCU=KG ME)=Q=V@090;T*AUI'G<;5)!JZ2NRH1)YT&U'K>4E98<V0:.-.&XTQ99TK'6; M&74(E.Z.5]HQ;F23#0LID$^*)*X;H%:AY:*TU;$1"DW05X04*?06X497H`5I M&*?^J^J,K):K6AACH/4CA<'2826^AZ):X5&EG;9EGGM2UN2WQS8*:!F"@BL2 MOA23FR.U5XXQ1AEPE+9AEVT<1UE``YEY1LM_6JI`@$PW[?33`6[TA!QIG!%0 M5)7]2ID1;[#AU!VW`0CUV$^'95AW()R5UEIMO1777'7=E=?9W?D%F&"$T;T1 M8I.F1B]EGS7:6>"@=F@GI:NUUJ)L<K[\-7>_72@<<:4FMUQS*4(G'75R6+=4 M=LFB7=9W_9%GWHCII;A>>^_%-U]]]^VG7^G_1=T$@08BJ""#1C@((:84?IHA MM89_V#?JD9JHY;>'+OXB'1./VZJ./`:T<9";$FDDDDH^AJB3API_F958@F`M M;EWB"Z:81X;1[)G0AJ'FK6YNY+R<(]=I,I[FIXPTE9&*&:$,)9)$>4]\T]I0 MI`Z7&KI82B3`PQZGMB>^;(VJ.->!&*JB5S%7P0HELZH5_4"D*UY=JU$6%!:Q M9.61_X4N7QMAEIF>%2TY)+!:6W)A"FT3,6^!3%_2*Q<(SD6'=+GA#.MJ%V'2 M`*\PR*M&?[,7R\*UH7[]JT])&EC!IG"PA#WI4`VCC:DV**,@YNAB&7,4OCKV M,0J%[(IT*MEB3M8_/JV,9EI[F0`/13,S/BIG.^O9`"LD-'L5S5L(5!K9%LDT MJ5'-:OQB0]:PQ36O[29LC&2DV42W$;49K6UPD0M=[**?N7$2!/KY2V`&4QB^ M2*$,8T'"VHYXAS#DP4IPF`R6RA`"_>B'<!DRW/'0PYHWN`9.C*N-XW8#.>#< M9C@81,YB+N<<S35!/]6Y#NBV<TJ1^%(!X)&.?\JSD?/013WL<0]\Y$,?^P3A MF[,3)WG$-J`"'2A!"VK0@[XIH>!I[5'%DU2(&DB&Y.UJ>4#2SYM@DTSHE;&# MU$N*]5(a)F).T=*4EM6-+W4!F^/)(O2SD40_J^%"8\M>]]-)3?<>BG4/LA\WGY MD^.=4,8G!`:PD#]K*:*`!#!DW7"!PW2@3G6:J8IV2H<=B^88)?90FPWK-CJ5 M%:T\,L)<[:I72-56:59HK$1N1*<R=!::5&K#/YZO@AWCUAQ\2"&=B@NB0T27 MNHJCQ'<][(ELB&)`6.;6*F;(7P<,F!8-AK#>\)-A#EOJ8SCH5#1JC&5LY.L; M#T(a)R.]%13W9T$AY]>M-!Z;2/$,49Q@+ILT(1<E!$VQ,B\^B";V9RD8ZLVM4D M"<RM=>UKF'SMV+B&'&+)*0V#8HP9*%,$)(``#>XS%1RL(YDQ8>XY9%"M&\KP M&&_=(64/2\RW]&,A2-T!#<9$P5[10*PWR,8@.TK!E2QYA\2AY4BMB:Z9Y%>& MW@PAKZH1"&4V5-`C0&9G^E$*9>#P&.3"X7H@V,QTUWJ;.Y(7I#XJ@Y7$4(>M MEF8@M0E('5:SU]8880I&`($)]*.%Q9`!8BAH[WHEN8;1W.%*-ZHP"(JK*O*> MX3GF=1:\5J:H%)!/NWO=D'X"@B?@&/%HM>S2$1AD`A`$@3$[`P$*:'R;]#"D MLL^-IH6D:9V`4&;)5S)#D?6#+Q%`09?+@\-1P&2EZ+KA!'00@2'3H)C:2%$. M&P:1<"93!SS/P8L-DY^7B!45-G"W#!LJ36N**\4B+V2C:<'2&'@E/R9"2BTW M]M!^D92&*,,A#`1>BJ#T@]DR[*B^W[R""XK@@BGT!@E*F9$;9@=<2*8!8D/8 M4]#<T-ZH9`XQE%HK'?*@'RET&(a)V[)H.5K/#._7SEV=".MK2G3>UJ6_O:V,ZV MMK?-[6Y[^]O@#K>XQTWN<IO[W.A.M[K7S>YVN_O=\(ZWO.=-[WK;^][XSK>^ M]\WO?OO[WP`/N,`'3O""&_S@"$^XPA?.\(8[_.$0C[C$)T[QBEO\XAC/N,8W /SO&.>_SC(`^YR$=.\G@# ` end - -----End Forwarded Message----- - -- Clemens Stiglechner a9401816(a)unet.univie.ac.at compuserve: 100725,3222 0xE7A9BDE5 1024 bit - 1996/03/28 99 EC A6 35 0F 85 4D 0D 14 BA 81 D5 71 37 F8 8A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMXFzouKiyjznqb3lAQEWpQP/bJ01LVanoLiRAUlotLK2O9zxuN06TAZ9 n4FkJWN7dDcXAPLrlrgVlh//0sUnpgmGYeaP0+jrySv6OchtqGaRg6wlqvIIML6+ M+uxz9ntq1/AtEWEmRoYzI/PaPSWg9LtSGZotRukpXen47mKuQGqXvrusy/zbgzH x9g0ztmOeNM= =/o0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

FIX_rsa
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

4-15-96, W$U: "RSA Data May Be Sold in Stock Deal." Security Dynamics Technolgies, Inc. is in talks to buy closely held RSA Data Security Inc., the dominant supplier of privacy technology for the Internet, for stock valued at about $200 million. Industry executives said Security Dynamics may hope to combine its proprietary technology with standard encryption software from RSA, which could yield products that can be used with a broader array of computer products. Some of RSA's partners may be taken aback, since few are familiar with relatively obscure Security Dynamics. The largest single RSA shareholder is Addison Fischer, founder of a Florida security-products concern called Fischer International. FIX_rsa

1 0