- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

careful reading
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thursday 8/27/98 7:08 PM Charles R Smith http://www.us.net/softwar/ I am reading http://www.us.net/softwar/plight.html hardcopy REAL CAREFULLY. With a yellow highligher. Goal is to help each other out. I think I see some problems, but nothing FATAL. I think I see some FATAL deficiencies at ht.//csrc.nist.gov/encryption/aes/round1/docs.htm So let's all continue to THINK. And help EACH OTHER. bill

1 0

Man with a permanent lump in his pants/OVER 20 FREE HI-RES JPG PHOTOS
by STUFFED NEWS DAILY 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We continue as we mean to go on with 20+ hot, hi-res photos... + HOT 'N' SEXY STORIES + FACTUAL SEX GUIDES (VERY USEFUL INFO) + OUTRAGEOUSLY FUNNY AND SEXY STORIES + *YOUR* TRUE SEX SECRETS YOU'VE BEEN SENDING US (HOT!) + LOADS & LOADS MORE SEXY STUFF! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/8/27/ <---- Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL above. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the URL, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/8/27/ <----

1 0

Government: Home-Business
by Creative Financial Alternatives 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Friend, Thank you for your interest. Please take a minute to read this important information or simply print it out. All the information here is 100% accurate and can be verified with the Department of HUD in Washington D.C. *************************************************************** Honest Home-Business NO MLM or SELLING involved Earn $500 to $1,000 per week guaranteed. *************************************************************** *************************************************************** NOW YOU CAN MAKE UP TO $1,000.00 A WEEK OR MORE, IN YOUR SPARE TIME WORKING AT HOME AND HELPING THE GOVERNMENT FIND PEOPLE WHO THEY OWE MONEY TO! *************************************************************** You'll be your own boss. Work when you want... as much as you want. Sound Good? Then, read on because it gets a whole lot better!! Dear Friend, The truth is, the US Government really does have money to give away. In fact, right now there is more than $70,000,000.00 that legally belongs to millions of unsuspecting US citizens. Where does this money come from? When the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) approve a loan for a house, 1/2 of one percent of the loan amount is added by HUD/FHA to the loan interest as insurance in the event that the borrower does not pay the mortgage. That money accumulates interest over the life of the loan. If the house is taken away from the borrower through foreclosure, that money is forfeited. However, when the borrower pays off the loan, they are entitled to a full refund of that money. Over 20-30 years, that can add up to a substantial amount of money!! So what does this mean for you? EASY MONEY!! I'll explain. Most people do not know that this amount is due to them- many have relocated. Since HUD/FHA doesn't have the resources to track down each and everyone of the borrowers due a refund, they developed the Refund Tracer Program for the purpose of allowing people, just like you, to earn money by locating borrowers. You see, thanks to the little known Mortgage Refund Tracer Program, you can easily perform a valuable service. As a Refund Tracer, you can help return millions of dollars to rightful owners and collect part of what you return in processing fees. Just think of it!! A fantastic opportunity to earn substantial amounts of money. You can start right away and earn $300 to $1,000.00 a week or more, right from your own home. There is really no limit what you can earn. It's up to you how much you want to work. You can be young or old, male or female, single or married, employed or unemployed. It doesn't matter. A WIN/WIN/WIN SITUATION! The government wins since the money must be refunded to it's rightful owners. The borrower wins because he or she receives money the borrower is entitled to. You win because you receive a generous processing fee. Everybody wins! NO EXPERIENCE NEEDED The good news is that you don't need experience, or special training. In fact, if you can read, write, and follow simple step-by step instructions, you can earn lots of money in this business. That's where the REFUND TRACER PROGRAM MANUAL comes in. It explains everything you need to know. It is a step-by-step instruction manual that will show you secrets that will allow you to start receiving cash payments quickly. Nothing will be left unanswered, and once you have the manual, you will not have to purchase anything else from us. Here's an example of what you'll get... * An information-packed manual with easy to follow instructions. * All government forms provided by HUD/FHA * Sample letters needed to inform borrowers that you are a Refund Tracer and are willing to help them get what is due to them. Plus, all other letters you will be sending during the processing time period. * A FREE STATE Listing for any STATE. * You'll also have our technical support along the way. * SPECIAL BONUS " Personal Complete Guide to the Internet". This is a 175 page 15 Chapter E-Book that covers the whole Internet and it is yours FREE when you order our program within the next 10 days. Here's some of what you'll learn... * How to obtain names of people due mortgage refunds from HUD * The easiest ways to locate those due a refund * How to contact them to get an immediate response * How to process the necessary forms so that refunds are promptly issued * How to claim your share of their Government refund ...and much more! You can get started immediately without any special training or education and our manual will show you how. You will be able to start making money almost at once. You can get started on a shoestring!! You will be amazed at how easy it is. Imagine, earning hundreds....even thousands of dollars each week helping the government refund money. It will give you a good feeling just knowing you are helping people receive money they didn't know they had coming. You'll be getting paid for doing it! In 1986, Congress mandated that HUD make available to the general public lists of borrowers who were due refunds. We investigated and discovered one of "The Best Kept Money-Making Secrets In America". When I learned of the little-known Refund Tracer Program, We knew it was just what we had been looking for. This is probably the easiest, 100% legitimate, way to make money from scratch ever! You will find that... The fastest and best way to make a HUGE amount of money quickly is to trace people who have MILLIONS of DOLLARS in refunds due to them and then claim YOUR SHARE in Processing Fees. As long as HUD/FHA continues to approve loans, the money will never stop growing. Your money- making potential is endless! Every month, thousands of names become available for processing, names that are available for you to earn cash by helping borrowers receive their government refunds. WHAT COULD BE EASIER? Now just ask yourself, what message is more powerful than telling someone that you are going to help them receive a substantial sum of money that they didn't know they had coming? Believe us, they will love you for it, and will be more than happy to pay your fee. But this is only part of what makes this program so easy to use. Our manual will make it even easier for you to get started earning CASH RIGHT NOW! THE ULTIMATE WORK-AT-HOME MONEY-MAKER!! We know what you're thinking (it sounds too good to be true). But believe us, it is 100% true and completely legitimate. Imagine a money-making program that was established by the government. You can do this right at your kitchen table, or if you have a computer your even one step ahead. Let your computer start helping you make some money, instead of costing you money! The Refund Tracer Program is recognized as an extension of the services provided by HUD/FHA. This program is a gratifying way to earn extra money, especially since you are also helping someone else at the same time. The work you will be doing is simple, pleasant and absolutely anyone can do it! Without any formal training or education, Refund Tracers who have just started are earning $300 to $1,000 or more a week! It depends on your determination, and how much you want to make! If you have any additional questions for us feel free to call us at: 216-226-8799. Please don't delay. The only way you can lose is doing nothing, and that would be a shame. You owe it to yourself and your family. So act now. You'll be glad you did! We give you everything you need to get started right away, including a FREE state listing Nobody can even come close to matching this offer. Other people sell you the Manual then charge extra for the State Listing, not us. We give you the whole business for almost nothing. For a small amount, you can take a big step towards financial independence. We're looking forward to hearing from you! Plus, if you order the program we will personally assist you with any ideas or questions you may have while working the program, so your not alone in this. We'll be here to help you along you're way Below is an example of the State Listings. ---------------------------------------------- Name Address & City Case# & Zip Date & Money owed ------------------------------------------------------------- Smith, Joe 1626 Ansel Drive 441-024360 07/06/94 Dayton OH 45416 $1,800.00 Virgil Baker 804 10th Avenue 411-031524 03/01/95 Middletown OH 45042 $1,134.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- As you can see you are provided with quite a bit of information. This is what make the program so EASY to work!!! ********** 90 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE ************** Here's how our policy works all you have to do is try the program for 90 days then if your not satisfied simply return it for a refund. So you have nothing to lose. If your looking for a real opportunity you found it. Respectfully yours, Creative Financial Alternatives The Program Only Costs $33.95 Send payment to: Creative Financial Alternatives Unclaimed Funds 18645 Detroit Ave. Suite 714 Lakewood, Ohio 44107 We accept Money Order or Check Made Payable to: Creative Financial Alternatives We are pleased to announce were able to accept checks by phone or fax to help you get started immediately. If you want to get started right away. The purpose of accepting checks by phone and fax is that it speeds up the process so you can get started immediately. Phone us at: 1-216-226-8799 Fax your check to: 1-216-226-3225 * Please note that if you do check by phone or fax you will need to keep that specific check for your own records. Please do not mail it to us or deposit it at your bank. Simply void it out and keep it for your own records. ************* QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ***************** You are bound to have some questions about the Government Refund Tracer Program. Below are some commonly asked questions and my straightforward answers. Also, if you have any questions that aren't answered below please call us at: 216-226-8799 We'll be glad to answer them for you. Q: Is the Government Refund Tracer Program legal? A: Yes, in 1986 Congress mandated that HUD make available to the general public lists of borrowers due refunds. Subsequently, HUD created the Tracer Program. Q: Can I do this from any state? A: Yes, you can live in one state and trace people in another state, you can do it from anywhere! Q: How much does the Tracer receive? A: We recommend 25%-30%, of the refund. Q: How do I obtain the names of the refund recipients? A: You can get them directly from HUD or us. Q: Why can't the person owed a refund get the money for themselves? A: They can, however the vast majority of people don't know anything about the Government refund process. They would need a case number and other specific information only you have. This lack of knowledge is what makes the tracer so valuable, because they can't do it without you. Q: Does this program require a large investment? A: No, expenses (such as lists of names, stamps,etc.) will depend on how large an area you intend to cover and since you will be self-employed these expenses will be tax-deductible. Most of your investment will be your time and effort. Q: What is the average refund amount? A: The average refund amounts range from $800-$1,000, but refunds of $4,000 are not unheard of. It all depends on the area or state you target. Q: If I did a refund for $1,130.94 how much would I get? A: Your fee is 30% so you would get $339.28 for that one claim!! Q: How do I find these people? A: You can go through the phone book directory or if you have a computer with a CD-ROM drive you can purchase a copy of "Home Phone" it's a directory of over 85 million residential phone numbers. The majority of these people are still at the current addresses on the form from HUD. Thank you very much and we look forward to talking with you in the near future. Creative Financial Alternatives 18645 Detroit Ave. Suite 714 `\|||/ Lakewood, Ohio 44107 (o o) Phone: 216-226-8799 Fax: 216-226-3225 ooO_(_)_Ooo________________________________________________ _____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____| _____|__ __|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____| _____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|

2 1

Cafe Gulag
by Wm. Michael Denney 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Msg for Jim Choate... Contact Larry Joe Dowling at 512-892-3393. from TOTO

1 0

dow jones
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 8/28/98 10:07 AM J Orlin Grabbe You may have gotten it TOO RIGHT http://www.aci.net/kalliste/apocalyp.htm Morales and I met. We got a response from a deputy clerk to our attached letter. No form for 54(b) certification and no examples. We have a plan of what to include in our response to http://www.jya.com/chrysler98.htm AND 54(b) certification. We see that we can respond by e-mail. e-mail: vhardy(a)detroit.bozell.com But we'll use certified snail mail too. Reporter Spohn of the ABQ Trib 1990 Lawrence Spohn, Albuquerque Tribune http://www.aaas.org/AAAS/awards.html http://www.atiin.com/atiin/tribune.htm http://www.abqtrib.com told me he is going to make FOIA requests for the invoices NSA spent or wasted funding public key cryptography chips TOO. Morales and I also discussed our up-coming NSA fee waiver lawsuit. NSA deputy director Barbara McNamara's wrote me a letter dated 19 August 1998. http://www.nsa.gov:8080/mission.html McNamara wrote, The key issue I considered in my review is whether disclosure of the information is likely to contribute to the public understanding of the operations or activities of the government. ... This response may be construed as a denial of your appeal. Accordingly, you are hereby advised to your right to seek judicial review of my decision pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4) (B) in the United States District Court in the district in which you reside, in which you have your principal place of business, in which the Agency's records are situated (U.S. District Court of Maryland), or in the District of Columbia. We've learned a lot with our current NSA lawsuit. So the NEXT lawsuit should be more devastating for the government. But let's hope we get this UNFORTUNATE matter settled so that we can move on to other projects. I miss the economic articles you post from throughout the world. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Whats happening is not your fault. You are merely a message-deliverer. Later bill Tuesday 8/18/98 7:33 AM Certified Return receipt requested Robert M. March, Clerk United States District Court Office of the Clerk POB 2384 US Courthouse Santa Fe, NM 87504-2384 Dear clerk March: Purposes of this letter are to 1 request a copy of a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Rule 54(b) certification form if such form exists 2 request an example of a Rule 54(b) certification if such certification is submitted in non-standard form 3 ask for you to provide us with DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO case citations for others required by the Tenth circuit to seek Rule 54(b) certification. We could not find form referenced in 1 in LOCAL CIVIL RULES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO or at http://www.nmcourt.fed.us/dcdocs/ specifically http://www.nmcourt.fed.us/dcdocs/files/lcvrules.txt We ask that you respond to this letter by September 1, 1998. Nonresponse must be interpreted as 4 there is no Rule 54(b)form 5 there is no example of a Rule 54(b) non-standard form certification 6 there are no examples of Rule 54(b) certifications in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Sincerely William H. Payne Arthur R. Morales 13015 Calle de Sandias NE 1024 Los Arboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87111 Albuquerque, NM 87107 Friday February 27, 1998 11:18 AM By e-mail and US mail Lieutenant General Kenneth A Minihan, USAF Director, National Security Agency National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000 Dear General Minihan: Purposes of the letter are to 1 request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2 explore settlement possibilities of our current lawsuit. In about 1986 Sandia National Laboratories assigned me the task of design and construction of a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty seismic data authenticator. In the initial stages of the project, Sandia cryptographer Gustavus Simmons attempted to convince both Sandia management and NSA employees Tom White, Mark Unkenholtz, and Ed Georgio that a form of public key authentication should replace NSA employee Ronald Benincasa's National Seismic Station/Unmaned Seismic Observatory 11-bit data authentication algorithm. My Sandia supervisor John Holovka and project leader H B [Jim] Durham ordered me to write a paper explaining public key cryptography. This paper, RSA ENCRYPTION, along with my SAND report describing my implementation of Benincasa's algorithm and filings in our lawsuit, now appear on Internet at http://www.jya.com/index.htm, click CRYPTOME, then OpEd, then http://www.jya.com/whprsa.htm. Sandia explored the merits of switching from Benincasa's algorithm to a public key-based authentication method suggested by Simmons. For Sandia's evaluation of the merits of public key, electronic tagging, and Bureau of Engraving and Printing projects , I bought for Sandia samples both the Cylink CY1024 and AT&T A & B two chip sets for modulo m arithmetic computations. NSA employee Tom White sent me a copy of the SECRET classified NSA report on IBM's hardware public key chip FIREFLY. I wrote in my tutorial paper RSA hardware computations The slow speed of software RSA computations plus the potential wide use prompted several companies to build chips which compute modular arithmetic to at least several hundred bits. Most of these chips "cascade" to compute with a larger number of bits. Corporations involved in building these chips are 1 IBM Firefly 2 AT&T 3 Motorola (apparently a three chip set) 4 Cylink Pittway-First alert 5 Sandia Labs (Algorithm M and predecessor chip) Details of the IBM chip is classified. AT&T as of July 1987 has not released details of their chip. Little information is available on the Motorola chip set. The Cylink chip is commercially available. Its price dropped from $1,500 to $600 each in June 1987. Data is transferred to and from the chip with serial shift register communication. The early Sandia chip was limited in speed. The replacement chip is cascadeable, communicates with 8 or 16 bits parallel, matches the speed of the Cylink chip, but is not out of fabrication. Rumors circulate that there is about an order of magnitude performance difference between some of these chips. These hardware chips improve exponentiation speed about 3 orders of magnitude over software implementation benchmarked on an Intel 8086 family microcomputer. Whitfield Diffie writes about both the Cylink and Sandia chips. And is quoted at http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm. Sandia had terrible luck with its public key chips. I reported SOME of the troubles to Electronic Engineering Times editor Loring Wirbel [http://techweb.cmp.com/eet/823/] on March 23, 1994. Dr. John Wisniewski was a supervisor at Sandia's Center for Radiation-hardened Microelectronics. Wisniewski was a graduate student at Washington State University in about 1975. I was a professor at WSU. Wisniewski knows all about the failing Sandia chips in the nuclear arsenal. I took notes on February 13, 1993. Wisniewski reviewed the problems again for me. 1 No quality initiative. Each chip lot had a different process. 2 Overall yield - 40-50%. Down to 10% after packaging. 3 Metalization problems. No planarization. No flow of glass. Couldn't use high temperature. Step coverage problems. Layed down over tension. 100% field returns over several years. 4 Sandia would store lots of parts for replacements. Sandia management made the decision to place low yield parts in the nuclear arsenal. Sandia must meet DOD schedules management reasoned. Hundreds of millions spent on CRM. Sandia must show productivity. Wisniewski told me that low yield chip test survivors are those which the tests failed to detect failures. Wisniewski will talk. 503-625- 6408. Wisniewski now works for Intel in Oregon. Have Wisniewski tell you about the fire in the CRM clean room! Sandia supervisor Jerry Allen later told me it cost $300,000 each to remove Sandia's failing chips at Pantex from a nuclear bomb. NSA apparently is biased toward hardware implementations of cryptographic and authentication algorithms. As opposed to software implementation. NSA representatives and Sandia management decided not to use a public key authentication scheme for its CTBT seismic data authenticator because of all of the problems with implementing public key algorithms. But NSA surely has spent MUCH MONEY on public key chip implementations. NSA is promoting its Clipper crypto chips as described at http://cpsr.org/dox/clipper.html. And we get some information about technical specifications of NSA's Clipper chip at http://www.us.net/softwar/http://www.us.net/softwar/clip.html Clipper Chip Information MYK-78 CLIPPER CHIP ENCRYPTION/DECRYPTION ON A CHIP 1 micron double level metal CMOS technology 0.35 watts power 28 pin plastic leaded chip carrier (PLCC) package Transistor to transistor logic (TTL) interface Chip ID, family key and device unique key are installed at programming. Chip ID, family key and device unique key are installed at programming facility and are completely transparent to the user. Therefore, Under the provision of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 USC 552, I am requesting access to: 1 Copies of all invoices from A AT&T B Motorola C IBM D Sandia National Laboratories to NSA for payments for developing ANY public key-related chips between January 1, 1980 and February 27, 1998. 2 Copies of all invoices to NSA from ANY corporation involved in development of ANY Clipper chip-related hardware between January 1, 1980 and February 27, 1998. The public has a right to know how much NSA spent on TRYING monoploize the crypto business. If there are any fees for searching for, or copying, the records I have requested, please inform me before you fill the request. As you know, the Act permits you to reduce or waive the fees when the release of the information is considered as "primarily benefiting the public." I believe that this requests fits that category and I therefore ask that you waive any fees. If all or any part of this request is denied, please cite the specific exemption(s) which you think justifies your refusal to release the information and inform me of your agency's administrative appeal procedures available to me under the law. I would appreciate your handling this request as quickly as possible, and I look forward to hearing from you within 20 working days, as the law stipulates. With respect to our current FOIA lawsuit, I feel that we should settle this unfortunate matter. I see from your biography at http://www.nsa.gov:8080/ and http://www.nsa.gov:8080/dirnsa/dirnsa.html that you are 1979 Distinguished Graduate Master of Arts degree in National Security Affairs Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California One of my former M.S. and Ph.D students in Computer Science, Ted Lewis, is currently the chairman of Computer Science at Naval Postgraduate School [http://www.friction-free-economy.com/] Small world. But I think that this emphasizes that WE SHOULD all be on the same side. Not engaged in a conflict in US federal court. Or on Internet. NSA attempts to withhold requested information are possibly unwise. In our wired world the aggrieved know what happened to them. http://www.wpiran.org/,http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/impact/namir/namirm.h… And moderates in Iran, http://persia.org/khatami/biography.html, appear want settlement too. My family and I have been damaged by these crypto wars. I ask you that consider fair settlement of damages caused by the National Security Agency. I cannot find your e-mail address on Internet. Therefore I will forward the e-mail copy of this FOIA/settlement letter to Ray Kammer of NIST [http://www.nist.gov/] who along with the FBI [http://www.fbi.gov/, http://www.fbi.gov/fo/nyfo/nytwa.htmand] and NSA are trying to control the crypto business so that Kammer can possibly forward an e-mail copy of the FOIA/Settlement letter to you. Sincerely, bill William Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias Albuquerque, NM 87111 505-292-7037 [I am not reading e-mail] http://www.cylink.com/ http://www.jya.com/tis-p-bckrs.htm Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:53:33 -0500 From: nospam(a)synernet.com (Ed Stone) Subject: Re: Another Network Associates U-Turn on Key Recovery To: jy(a)jya.com PGP Inc's new owner, Network Associates, has announced it is acquiring Trusted Informations Systems, Inc. On the TIS web site, the following project is detailed, in which Dr. Dorothy Denning was a subcontractor, and in which policy-based crypto key release systems were explored, in collaboration with the NSA, FBI, etc.: Source: http://www.tis.com/research/crypto/crypt_krp_projsum.html Policy-Based Cryptographic Key Release Systems Cryptographic Key Release Language Design and Specification View the quad chart graphic for the Policy-Based Cryptographic Key Release System Project Summary ARPA Order Number: 8685 Contractor: Trusted Information Systems, Inc. 3060 Washington Road Glenwood, Maryland 21738 Phone: (301) 854-6889 FAX: (301) 854-5363 Subcontractors: Dr. Dorothy Denning Dr. Burton Kaliski Dr. Warwick Ford Russel Housley http://www.nsa.gov:8080/ http://www.nsa.gov:8080/dirnsa/dirnsa.html 1979 Distinguished Graduate Master of Arts degree in National Security Affairs Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ http://www.nist.gov/ CPSR Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility http://cpsr.org/dox/home.html Clipper Clipper Chip Information http://cpsr.org/dox/clipper.html MYK-78 CLIPPER CHIP ENCRYPTION/DECRYPTION ON A CHIP http://www.us.net/softwar/http://www.us.net/softwar/clip.html 1 micron double level metal CMOS technology 0.35 watts power 28 pin plastic leaded chip carrier (PLCC) package Transistor to transistor logic (TTL) interface Chip ID, family key and device unique key are installed at programming. Chip ID, family key and device unique key are installed at programming facility and are completely transparent to the user. Dear General Minihan: Sincerely, William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Books 1.Bamford, James. The Puzzle Palace: A Report on America's Most Secret Agency. 2.Hafner, Katie and John Markoff. Cyberpunk: Outlaws and Hackers on the Computer Frontier 3.Lapidus, Edith. Eavesdropping on Trial.. 4.Schneier, Bruce. Applied Cryptography 5.Sterling, Bruce. The Hacker Crackdown. General Periodicals 6.Slatalla, Michelle and Joshua Quittner. "Gangwars in Cyberspace. " Wired. 7.Baker, Stewart A. "Don't Worry, Be Happy." Wired. 8.Denning, Dorothy. "The Clipper Chip Will Block Crime." Newsday. 9.Dewitt, Philip Elmer. "Who Should Keep the Keys?" Time. 10.Lewis, Peter. "Now Congress gets to weigh in on Clinton's high-tech plan for wiretapping." New York Times. 11.Markoff, John. "Big Brother and the Computer Age." New York Times. 12.Markoff, John. "Flaw Discovered in Federal Plan for Wiretapping." New York Times. 13.Markoff, John. "Industry Defies U.S. on Data Encryption."New York Times. Specialized Journals 14.--. "Cylink Offers Triple-DES ICs for Civil Service Encryption." Electronic News. 15.Banisar, David and Ken Robinson. "Security and Privacy on the Information Highway." Educom Review. 16.Blackmon, Ric. "Data-Tapping Made Easy" Phrack. 17.Peterson, A. Padgett. "Clipper chip won't clip your wings, it will just protect the unprotected." Infoworld. 18.*Steal, Agent. "Tapping Telephone Lines Voice or Data for Phun, Money, and Passwords." Phrack. * Pseudonym Government Documents 19.Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Wiretap Report. 20.Department of Justice. "Attorney General Makes Key Escrow Encryption Announcements." 21.House Subcommitte on Technology, Environment and Aviation. "Communications and Computer Surveillance, Privacy, and Security." 22.House Subcommitte on Telecommunications and Commerce. "Telecommunications Network Security." 23.Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. 24.U.S. Bureau of the Census. "Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1993". 25.White House Press Secretary. "Clipper Press Release." Institutional Sources 26.Association for Computing Machinery, U.S. Public Policy Committee. "Computer Policy Committee Calls for Complete Withdrawl of Clipper." 27.Computer and Business Equipment Manufacturers Association. "CBEMA Recommendations on Encryption Policy." 28.Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. "Clipper Fact Sheet." 29.Hanson, Robin. "Can Wiretaps Remain Cost-Effective?"Communications of the ACM 30.Hoffman, Lance, et al. "Cryptography Policy." Communications of the ACM. 31.Hoffman, Lance. "Clipping Clipper." Communications of the ACM. 32.Landau, Susan, et al. "Crypto Policy Perspecitves." Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 33.Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. "Wiretapping and Eavesdropping: Is There Cause for Concern?" Interviews 34.Lo, Virginia. Personal interview. 35.Schuman, David. Personal interview. 36.McClandish, Stanton. E-mail interview. Exclusive Internet Soucres 37.Rivest, Ron. "Re: Newsday Editorial." 38.Meeks, Brock. "Jacking in from the 'Sooner or Later' Port." CyberWire Dispatch 39.Gore, Al. "Letter to Representative Cantwell" Other 40.Delaney, Donald, et al. "Wiretap Laws and Procedures: What Happens When the U.S. Government Taps a Line." Purposes of this http://www.ihrwg.org/CP/ai82.htm During 1981 Amnesty' International received hundreds of allegations of torture of political prisoners, in particular in Evin Prison in Tehran. Some were supported by photographs and medical reports. The methods of torture described in these reports included beating, kicking, whipping with cables, banging heads against walls, burning with cigarettes, burning with an iron and mock executions. One report described a special room at Evin Prison called autog-e autoo (ironing room) in which prisoners were tied to a bed and their backs, buttocks and the soles of their feet were burned with an iron. In another place in Evin Prison called zire zamin-e haqiqat (basement of truth) it was alleged that prisoners were burned with cigarettes during interrogation.

1 0

Re: Man Sex
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Interstate 95 wrote: > SEX(1) EUNUCH Programmer's Manual SEX(1) > > NAME > sex -- have sex > > SYNOPSIS > sex [options] ... [username] ... > > DESCRIPTION > sex allows the invoker to have sex with the user(s) speci- > fied in the command line. If no users are specified, they > are taken from the LOVERS environment variable. Options > to make things more interesting are as follows: > > -a external stimulus (aphrodisiac) option > etc, Lets see ... # sex -monica processing ... -m masochism ... -o oral ... -n necrophilia ... -i coitus interruptus ... -c chocolate sauce option -a external stimulus (aphrodisiac) option Close, but no cigar.

1 0

^*^* I lost 23 Pounds In 4 Weeks, So Could You!!! *^*^
by Thin_Is_In......＠Prodigy.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

EAT! EAT! EAT! And Still Lose Weight! No Joke! Need To Lose Weight Quick? Don't Have Time To Exercise? HERE'S YOUR ANSWER! And You Can Eat As Much As You Want! Introducing Slender Now(tm) GUARANTEED WEIGHT LOSS FOR LIFE! How Confident Are We?... In 30 Days If You're Not Completely Satisfied With This System, Send The "Empty" Bottles Back For FULL Refund! This System Is So Effective, Test Subjects Typically Lose 10 - 15 Pounds of FAT in the FIRST MONTH! More Importantly, The Rebound Effect So Common With Other Forms Of Weight Loss Has Been Eliminated. * A NO-FAIL Slender Now(tm) BURN, BIND, BLOCK and BUILD System BURN - StimuLean(tm) - A Unique Herbal Thermogenic Formula that allows stored fats to be turned into energy (see below). BIND - SlenderLean(tm) - A unique state-of-the-art fiber-based product that binds up to 40 grams (360 fat calories) of dietary fat from the foods you've just eaten, therefore throwing these excess fat calories out of your body as waste rather than storing them as fat (see below). BLOCK - Phase'oLean(tm) - It's back! Dr. Marshall's Exclusive STARCH BLOCKER(tm) FORMULA has been approved for re-release for the first time in 15 years! Each tablet has the capacity to block the digestion and absorption of more than 100 grams or more than 400 calories of starch (see below). BUILD - Aminolyze(tm) - This product contains the specific amino acids necessary for your body to make new collagen. It helps maintain lean body mass and build muscle tissue; very important while losing weight. You burn fat, rather than muscle, which helps to maintain a healthy lean body mass ratio * Eat as much as you want! * Your energy level will skyrocket! * 100% safe and all natural! * Get results in two weeks! * 30 Day Money back guarantee - no questions asked! * EAT AS MUCH AS YOU WANT! That's right, you can continue to eat your favorite high calorie foods and still lose weight! That was mpossible until now! With the revolutionary Slender Now(tm) System, you can enjoy your favorite foods like steak, pork, eggs and dairy products and still achieve your goal. * 100% SAFE AND ALL NATURAL! The Slender Now(tm) System contains no preservatives, sugar, starch, salt, wheat, yeast, milk, soy derivatives, artificial flavoring or coloring agents. * GET RESULTS IN TWO WEEKS! 90% of our clients are experiencing incredible results and immediate energy within the first two weeks! * MONEY BACK GUARANTEE! You have 30 days to try the products. If you are less than completely satisfied, send the "empty" bottles back for a full 100% refund. You Have 30 DAYS To Try The Products At Wholesale Prices Here is what just two people had to say (and there are many more): Sharon H., female, age 44, Real-Estate agent, Atlanta, GA. "I've lost 23 pounds in four weeks and 2 dress sizes and my husband has lost 15. We were skeptical because we thought it was another one of those fad diets. However, after researching and experiencing the products, this is going to revolutinalize weight loss. People have been asking me what I'm doing and when I tell them they don't believe it, so I just tell them to try it. Why not? It comes with a 100% money back guarantee!" Stanley K., male, age 41, Pittsburgh, PA. "These products are amazing! Not only have I lost 15 pounds in first month, my energy level is high and consistent throughout the day. The system is easy; I've never been able to lose weight like this! I'm actually eating more! This has just blown me away. And the most incredible thing is that I've haven't dieted a bit with the exception of avoiding excess starches." For FREE, No Obligation Information About The Slender Now(tm) System, Call Toll FREE: 1-888-668-0615 Due to the overwhelming response, you may get a busy signal. If you do call 1-888-841-6242

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - August 28, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

========================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. A new multi-billion dollar industry is here! Be at CTIA's WIRELESS I.T. '98 where personal computing and communications converge! Don't Miss Your Chance -- October 12-14, 1998 Bally's Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV For more information, visit http://www.wirelessit.com ===========================================

1 0

retry re. Cafe Gulag
by Wm. Michael Denney 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is a retry because I have only vague recollections of last night. G -------------- This msg is intended to reach Jim Choate with a request that he contact Larry Joe Dowling at 512-892-3393 signed by "Toto" ------------------------ passed along by gomez due to phone call from SOG

1 0

How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.
by tcmay＠got.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 12:18 AM 7/15/96, Dave Banisar wrote: >Its now up at http://www.epic.org/crypto/key_escrow/wh_cke_796.html > Thanks. I took an initial look, and it looks like the same old stuff. The report speaks of an "emerging consensus" (for key escrow). I see just the opposite, unless the report is speaking only of the U.S. intelligence and law enforcement community and its foreign counterparts. Business has made it clear (cf. the several recent reports) that it is opposed to the Administration's plan, and that if a market for some form of key escrow exists (as it certainly does, in specific contexts), that the market can supply the solution. And certainly the civil liberties groups and groups such as ourselves are not part of this "emerging consensus." Ditto for the "average man in the street," as evidenced by opinion polls (I recall 80% opposition reported by one of the newsweeklies, but don't quote me), by anecdotal reports (e.g., Zimmermann's tale of his discussions), and by opposition to Clipper I, Clipper II, and now Clipper III. A bunch of Congressmen, including the axis supporting the Burns bill, obviously are not part of this emerging consensus. The National Research Council report made it clear that a distinguished panel of cryptographers, computer scientists, and policy professionals did not think key escrow is desirable. And the hundreds of folks in attendance at recent SAFE and NRC travelling roadshows were obviously not in support of key escrow. Business, civil liberties groups, professional organizations, and most Net people are opposed to the Administration's key ecrow proposals (such as they are understood to be, in Clipper I/II/III). So, who is in this "emerging consensus"? Moving on to the wisdom of imposing a government solution to what either is or is not a market need, there is great danger in deploying even a nominally (at this time) "voluntary standard." This is a danger many of us have felt for years to be the main danger of nominally (and ostensibly) "voluntary" systems. Imagine a voluntary system supported and funded by the government, using its power to limit exports and to "jawbone" foreign governments. (No time here to examine the obvious issues--cf. the archives for many explications over the past several years.) Once widely deployed, and perhaps mandatory in countries like France, Singapore, Iraq, and the like, it would take very little more to simply pass a law restricting the non-escrowed alternative in the U.S. (Sure, such a law might be unconstitutional, for the reasons we so often discuss. Sure, there are many circumventions possible. Sure. The point is not to rehash these points again but to indicate why Cypherpunks and civil libertarians should NOT support any plan, even a "voluntary" plan, that puts such power to set standards in the hands of the government. Even a "signed promise" is not enough, given the dangers of "flipping a switch.") Is this a plausible scenario, though? Well, were I in the LEA/TLA community, this is what my fallback plan would probably be. Realizing that a full-frontal ban on strong crypto, or crypto without backdoors, would not fly at this time (unless Oklahoma II happens, in which case all bets are off), and realizing that the plans for Clippers I, II, and III have been fizzling, I would push for a relatively harmless-sounding "voluntary key escrow" plan. I would push hard on Netscape, Microsoft, Novell, Sun, Apple, and the other companies (but mainly on Netscape and MS, for obvious reasons) to bundle in "trusted third parties" and all that GAK stuff. Bundle it in, make it easy to use, make it easy to export, make it easy to spread in crypto-hostile countries, and hope like hell that it undermines the push for PGP and S/MIME. I would work closely with Mossad, GCHQ, SDECE, Chobetsu, Savak, and all the other secret policemen of the world to make sure that while America might remain an "island of strong crypto" for a while at least, that the same could not be said of other countries. That is, I would work to help them limit crypto use in their own countries to GAK-only forms. (Those pesky survivalists, militia members, and ACLU folks in America could keep using their Bass-o-matic and PGP tools, but most of the rest of the world would be mostly limited to GAK and New World Order software.) Then, in about 2002 or so, depending on how many more serious terrorist incidents have occurred, I would drop the hammer on strong crypto. Maybe an Executive Order, maybe a state of national emergency, maybe a liberal interpretation of the commerce clause, maybe an Act of Congress.... Once a New World Order-approved GAK system is widely deployed, outlawing of "rogue cryptography" in the U.S. is more manageable. That's what I would do. (But not being on that side of the ideological fence, I will instead fight GAK as I always have. And I will not be fooled by talk of how "Americans will always be free any form of cryptography." Not when those same reports from the Administration, and the testimony of Louis Freeh, etc., is in the same breath taling about the need to stop pornographers from encrypting their files, and so forth. Do they think we're stupid?) Don't be fooled. --Tim May Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

10 10