- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

AT&T buys a Bill
by The Anarchives 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

"The name of the game is Monopoly" The Anarchives Volume 3 Issue 2 The Anarchives Published By The Anarchives The Anarchy Organization The Anarchives tao(a)lglobal.com Send your e-mail address to get on the list Spread The Word Pass This On... --/\-- AT&T buys / / \ \ a Bill ---|--/----\--|--- \/ \/ Welcome to the /\______/\ Information Age -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ February 9 1996 With the passing of the U$ 1996 Telecommunications Bill, we begin the game of monopoly, and we will see the rise of a new monopoly, a conglomeration of existing information providers, the ministry of communications for the emerging corporate state, an embodiment if not explicitly AT&T. The telecommunications <or what will soon be termed 'communications> industry is inherently a monopoly. At least that's what the monopoly will argue when it finally wins the game. Traditionally communication monopolies have been held in check by regulation from public institutions, and geographic separation by containing monopolies within regional markets. The U$ Telecommunications Bill removes regulation, and introduces the double-speak 'competition', freeing monopolies to compete with each other across areas of local and long-distance markets. The double-speak comes in the fact that you need billions of dollars to compete in the first place. In quoting Robert E. Allen, Chairman and C.E.O. of AT&T, "the fast lane has opened up", we are witnessing the continued acceleration of technological change, and the simultaneous acceleration of AT&T's imperial penetration into all communication markets. The Telecommunications Bill carried with it provisions for the V-Chip, a piece of technology that promises to 'filter' television violence. This part of the bill is a RED HERRING for both supporters and opponents, drawing attention away from the crucial decision of telecom. deregulation. As if filtering television violence will even dent the rise of violence in our society. Violence that stems with an indentity crisis induced by the rapid deployment of information technology, and the submersion of the self within the technological mass. Of course we're told the solution to violence is just more technology, itself enhancing our virtual reality. 'here let's put some salt on that wound...' Two 'baby bells', NYNEX and Bell Atlantic, local phone monopolies covering the north-eastern U$, are about to merge, and form a runner-up to monolith AT&T. Concentration justified by competition. Everyone will grow fat, cause everyone is getting fatter. Those who don't eat, will be eaten. And with AT&T's recent announcement of a divestiture, they will have the flexibility and Ca$h necessary to traverse local and global markets, benefitting from the cross-subsidized marketing machine, and the value of a loyal and established 'brand'. To quote Robert E. Allen again: "We'll build our own network facilities to offer local services." As AT&T brags about 'building' the Global Information Infrastructure, they also announce a huge sale where they're selling all of their equipment manufacturing facilities. Why? Cause they were no longer the most profitable and successful telecomm equipment makers in the world. Northern Telecom now is. Why? Because NorTel adopted the digital switch a decade ahead of AT&T. So why is AT&T claiming they're going to be building the infohighway? Cause they're going to buy Northern Telecom. NorTel has recently scored contracts in China, Brazil, and the U$. They're the company building the networks of the world. With the money from the divestiture AT&T could easily buy NorTel. If they were really keen, they could increase there 2% stake in Bell Canada Enterprises, thus buying NorTel, Bell, and Bell Northern Labs, securing the world's best equipment corp., Canada's top R&D lab, and the Ontario and Quebec telecomm markets. Thus AT&T would be creating the foundation for North American corporate governance. Yet how does AT&T dominate the market, and how will they continue to dominate and eventually conquer the market? The easy and obvious answer is of course capital. AT&T has more, and controls more, and this certainly helps with ye olde corporate organization. However that is not the key focus of their success. AT&T will conquer markets as a result of the strategic use of artificial intelligence and neural networks. Artificial intelligence to navigate information networks, to manage marketing campaigns, to handle statistical and research data, to manage capital, and to manage the huge networks that are emerging as the global information infrastructure. This is the technology that AT&T markets as 'Intelligent Assistants', and this is the technology that will give AT&T the competitive advantage. In beginning his speach, Robert E. Allen said: "We've seen an all-out bi-partisan effort. The administration and both parties in Congress pullled together on a major issue that will touch the lives of everyone in this - and we've seen it happen at the beginning of a major election year." When i and i first read this paragraph I passed over it as just filler in the intro, but as i and i read on i and i realized the revealing nature of the passage. All levels of the U$ government, congress, senate, and the executive, both parties, all supported the Bill. Why? Cause they _all_ got bought off by the powerful telecommunications industry. AT&T sponsored the 1996 U$ elections, and in return can now enter the $US 80 Billion dollar local phone market, let alone the rest of the communications market they now spread unto. The name of the game is monopoly, and the medium is the machine, the thinking evolving corporate machine. love and mighty media analysis from the tao properganja center... -------------------------------------------------------------- To receive the Anarchives via email send a note to Majordomo(a)lglobal.com with the message in the body: subscribe anarchives Also check out: http://www.lglobal.com/TAO/

1 0

Re: Yeah, Yeah But what are we gonna do!
by avatar＠mindspring.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 04:07 PM 2/9/96 UT, you wrote: >It may just be me but ... > >i) This in-fighting and bickering doesn't seem very productive > >ii) What are we gonna do about the CDA? > The bikers fought the helmet law and won (in places) > We should do the same. > > "It is better to have tried and failed than never have tried at all" > > Our strength is in our numbers and our abilities we should use them > to ensure our freedom. Science fiction has become our reality and their >paranoia. > > All we have to lose is our freedom. > Actually, I fought the Bill by writing and getting others to write to their congressmen. I also rebutted the passing of the Bill into law. Each time writing to 144 House members and 64 Senate members. Charles Donald Smith Jr. ||The government is my shepherd I need not work. It alloweth me to lie down on a good job. It leadeth me beside stilled factories. It destroyeth my initiative. It leadeth me in the path of a parasite for politics sake. YEA, though I walk through the valley of laziness and deficet spending I shall fear no evil, for the government is with me. It prepareth an economic utopia for me by appropriating the earnings of my grandchildren. It filleth my head with false security. My inefficiency runeth over. Surely, the government should care for me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in a fools paradise forever.................AMEN! || nuke'm if ya got'em||

1 0

IRC chat
by John A. Perry 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I've opened #remailop on EFnet if anyone would like to drop by and give their views on the telcom bill (or anything else for that matter). See you there! John Perry - KG5RG - perry(a)vishnu.alias.net - PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome! WWW - http://www.alias.net PGP 2.62 key for perry(a)vishnu.alias.net is on the keyservers. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by mkpgp1.6.b2, a Pine/PGP interface. iQEVAwUBMRvpqKghiWHnUu4JAQFGTwf+J7h60z0eZ9r7BprjzGASBGLRpPdQDpSg tJ7kog5VWtToFEK4ljXa+eu9KerpkqdqqbG9G8RMIABapbn41091VfeuYeEpgAuc nkUhF7rNYSbvuUlqLc/F/KhnUm6Ki0fsNnj+J6hyWCcwN3alhkWpSox5wJKo3fmc xJemYufEUcby1MiAupKyHLDHk8+dT9OdrlitHzWBKIsfv/1eLj9u9CnJOJu+Ndq8 +SgqGxNt+z8EDduK2x4jfxxdSHtp8ApMw2WLZ9sctlzCX9iz48wnw3NZcT0pU3pD OSyb9catClwzOEEyPlRBVVZClqbP3CSTQIbSbKOTAJfPPBenA6cXrQ== =18tD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

DUR_fum
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

2-10-96. EcoMist: "We know you're reading this." A survey of US privacy issues, with GAK, crypto and anonymity options. Americans think they have a right to privacy but they have lost control over who knows what about them. The chief culprits are lots of little brothers, all gossiping with each other over computer networks. But Big Brother is doing his bit: in the struggle against crime, terrorism, deadbeat parents, illegal immigrants and even traffic jams, the government keeps an ever-closer eye on its citizens. Technology itself may provide a partial answer. All-but-foolproof encryption technology is freely available over the Internet and will not go away no matter how much Uncle Sam wishes it would. "Virtual privacy." A related editorial which examines privacy protection regulation. "Magic armour." The Shortstop system deploys coherent jamming to fool a proximity fuse into thinking that its shell has arrived at detonation height when it is actually at an altitude of 100 metres or so. To do this, Shortstop uses a special "durfum" chip. DUR_fum (For the 3)

1 0

IBM, RSA Security
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

More On IBM's Internet SecureWay Security Plans London, 9 February 1996 -- IBM UK has revealed a little more of the detail surrounding its deal with RSA Data Security for the Big Blue range of SecureWay Internet security products and services. According to Kathy Kincaid, director of IT (information security) programs with Big Blue, the idea behind the development project is to develop a set of open cryptography standards for the Internet and other networks, so supporting secure electronic commerce. Both companies plan to develop interoperable security across IBM products and other vendor platforms. According to IBM, their efforts will provide customers and developers with safe universal access to the Internet, consistent with US and non-US export regulations governing cryptographic products. The linkup between the two companies, Kincaid explained, will allow them to modify RSA's BSAFE encryption engine and Big Blue's Common Cryptographic Architecture (CCA) for interoperability between RSA's toolkits and IBM's CCA-based hardware systems. "The complementary skills, technology and experience of IBM and RSA will greatly benefit our customers and the security industry," Kincaid said, adding that both companies have been testing interoperability across a series of virtual private networks (VPNs). Jim Bidzos, RSA's CEO, claims that the deal will involve several levels of close cooperation between RSA and Big Blue, with staff at RSA's labs working with IBM's crypto researchers at its T J Watson facility to produce "more efficient and secure commercial cryptography. "In addition, there will be close cooperation on the development of protocols and interfaces. The result should be trusted, seamless, interoperable security across not only the IBM product line, but across vendor products as well, when the resulting technology is adopted by both RSA and IBM's large customer vase," he explained. In parallel with the launch of the SecureWay range of Internet products and services, IBM's Internet decision has agreed to begin an internal pilot test of RSA Secure, RSA's disk and file encryption technology, which includes a facility for emergency key access. Further details of IBM's SecureWay range of Internet products and services can be found on Big Blue's World Wide Web ages, at http://www.ibm.com . According to IBM, its security products support the security component of the Open Blueprint. A white paper on security in the Open Blueprint is available from IBM's Canada's test lab Web pages at http://www.torolab.ibm.com/openblue/openblue.html . -- IBM & RSA Develop "SecureWay" Internet Products London, 8 February 1996 -- IBM and RSA Data Security have teamed up to develop open cryptography systems for the Internet and other networks. Thanks to the linkup, IBM plans to ship a whole range of Internet security products to tie in with its existing range of Internet services, over the next few months. Anna Russell, a spokesperson for IBM's UK and European operations, said that the RSA technology and products deal applies worldwide, with the resultant security products expected to dovetail in with Big Blue's existing range of Internet services for businesses, end users, and major corporations. The whole ensemble of services, hardware and software, will be banded together under the umbrella name of SecureWay, a name that Russell claims will get the message across to potential users that the IBM portfolio covers many different aspects of computer networking. "The SecureWay products and services will be offered throughout IBM channels, ranging from dealers, right through to value-added resellers. The SecureWay range will be offered through all channels on a global basis," she explained. According to Russell, the SecureWay range include access controls, cryptographic hardware and software for the IBM server series, smart cards and readers, gateway firewalls, single logon security admin systems, anti-virus software, distributed security management, directory and security services for network servers, and Internet browsers and servers, as well as secured networks. Kathy Kincaid, director of IBM's information technology (IT) security programs in the UK and Europe, explained that the SecureWay product range will include an emergency response service, "ethical hacking" by Big Blue's global security analysis labs, and turnkey firewall installation services. ... --

1 0

Top this one
by A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Hell, UNC had its entire comms room taken out by a steam pipe breaking >caused by a water main bursting. Haven't there been any advances in >technology since the 40s? At a place I worked once upon a time, long, long ago. We had an "advanced projects laboratory" which was considered essential. It had its own mains power drop, a massive diesel generator, and a room full of lead-acid batteries for redundant backup in case the diesel didn't start. Dump truck lost its brakes, hit a power pole which fell on the generator shed, crushing the roof onto the diesel, incidently rupturing the coolant/ water pipes which flooded the adjacent battery room (batteries were in a well to contain the acid if it leaked. Well filled.) P.fla

1 0

Re: Zimermann Legal Defense Fund
by Alan Olsen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:07 PM 2/9/96 -0700, Philip L. Dubois wrote: >I agreed up front not to bill for all my time, and judging from >the rate of current contributions, it now appears that the Defense >Fund will cover the fees and costs that I billed. I would like to >see these other lawyers receive some compensation for their efforts. >Accordingly, all donations to the Zimmermann Legal Defense Fund >mailed, authorized, or generally "made" (as opposed to "received") >after midnight local time on 14 February 1996 will be distributed >among these other lawyers to defray their costs and, if possible, >to compensate them for a little of their time. > >I make this announcement because people contributing to the Fund >have a right to know that Mr. Zimmermann's actual defense costs >are now covered and that additional donations will go to lawyers >who agreed to work for free and who were absolutely essential to >the defense. Remember that nothing says "Thanks" like Cash! Don't forget the people who donated their time and efforts in keeping Phil out of jail and cryptography that much more free. --- Alan Olsen -- alano(a)teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction `finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ "We had to destroy the Internet in order to save it." - Sen. Exon "I, Caligula Clinton... In the name of the Senate and the people of Rome!" - Bill Clinton signing the CDA with the First Amendment bent over.

1 0

Re: Perry's whining, Ed's Sniveling
by David K. Merriman 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 09:21 PM 02/8/96 -0600, ecarp(a)netcom.com wrote: >Why doesn't Perry just shut the hell up? I've got more important things >to worry about than Perry's ignorant, fetid whining. Such as that CDA >thing in the Telecommunications Bill. > >Anyone for suing Bill? I am, if it will get you and Perry to stop sounding like a couple of 3-year-olds: "He hit me first!" "Did not!" "Did too!" "Did not!" ad nauseum Hell (that's my crypto-relevance: a clear violation of the CDA :-), I've got two cats that get along better.... Dave Merriman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMRoC2sVrTvyYOzAZAQFUbAP/a3g+Ykd1nSQuWP1SYP7RayFEYnIBHBRX yvcktG2iStZZ/bw7I59EBJPHVZDtMnx11ujl41wiK1V/49hoWyrHV5xUxcoId+c2 dSqM9yOKkVx8vdMuXxNEcHyVJRINryf+1xDVnCSDgtamKcWbbxWVnPGU4CvA/lq0 16TAZwXsxR4= =vEeX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------- "It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error." Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U.S. Judge <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> My web page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1148

1 0

FWD: ACLU Lawsuit
by Lynne L. Harrison 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Excuse cross-post for those of you who are own both lists. This from the ACLU's New York office. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 17:36:18 -0500 Subject: To All Plaintiffs in Online Decency Lawsuit To all Plaintiffs in the Online Decency Lawsuit: This morning we filed the lawsuit in Philadelphia. Judge Buckwalter, to whom the lawsuit was assigned, held a hearing this afternoon on our motion for a temporary restraining order to prohibit enforcement of the Act. The Government agreed at argument not to enforce the "indecent" and "patently offensive" provisions of the Act for 7 days. We count this as a victory. However, the Government did not agree not to eventually prosecute for material available during the next 7 days. Thus, we believe there is still a risk. With regard to the abortion provisions, the Government conceded that they are unconstitutional and will not be enforced. We will not be satisfied on this matter until they so stipulate in writing. The Judge gave the Government until Wednesday to respond in writing to our motion. He will then rule on our motion. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ~ CYBER-RIGHTS ~ ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Visit The Cyber-Rights Library, accessible via FTP or WWW at: ftp://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/Library/ http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/Library/ You are encouraged to forward and cross-post list traffic, pursuant to any contained copyright & redistribution restrictions. ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ******************************************************* Lynne L. Harrison, Esq. | "The key to life: Poughkeepsie, New York | - Get up; E-mail: | - Survive; lharrison(a)mhv.net | - Go to bed." *******************************************************

1 0

Re: CDA; Don't get mad, get even!
by lunaslide＠loop.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>I think that we should make an example of those responsible for the >CDA. Ignorance is really not an excuse here, because whoever voted for >for the bill should have known the CDA was attached to it, and should >have had some idea of what it did. > >Lets get a list of whos supporting this thing and bad press them back >before the dawn of time. Here's the votes from the Senate. I'll look for the House and get back. Forwarded message from Voter Tellecommunications Watch follows: \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ Senate Response on the CDA (Communications Decency Act) Where to find this information You can get this file by sending mail to vtw(a)vtw.org with "send response" in the subject line of the message. To receive VTW alerts via email, send a message to listproc(a)vtw.org with "subscribe vtw-announce firstname lastname" in the body of the message.. You can also get this file at URL:http://www.panix.com/vtw/exon/senate-response.html. Urgent news The Senate has passed the Communications Decency Act. The vote breakdown is below. The tally of the 6/14/95 vote on the Communications Decency Act Senators who voted to defeat the Communications Decency Act (A polite letter to congratulate them for defending your free speech rights would be appropriate.) D ST Name (Party) Phone Fax = == ================== ============== ============== D CT Lieberman, Joseph I. 1-202-224-4041 1-202-224-9750 D DE Biden Jr., Joseph R. 1-202-224-5042 1-202-224-0139 D IL Simon, Paul 1-202-224-2152 1-202-224-0868 senator(a)simon.senate.gov D IL Moseley-Braun, Carol 1-202-224-2854 1-202-224-2626 D MA Kennedy, Edward M. 1-202-224-4543 1-202-224-2417 senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov D MI Levin, Carl 1-202-224-6221 na D MN Wellstone, Paul 1-202-224-5641 1-202-224-8438 D NM Bingaman, Jeff 1-202-224-5521 na Senator_Bingaman(a)bingaman.senate.gov D NY Moynihan, Daniel P. 1-202-224-4451 na D OH Glenn, John 1-202-224-3353 1-202-224-7983 R RI Chafee, John H. 1-202-224-2921 na D VA Robb, Charles S. 1-202-224-4024 1-202-224-8689 Senator_Robb(a)robb.senate.gov vascr(a)CapAccess.org D VT Leahy, Patrick J. 1-202-224-4242 1-202-224-3595 senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov R VT Jeffords, James M. 1-202-224-5141 na D WA Murray, Patty 1-202-224-2621 1-202-224-0238 D WI Feingold, Russell 1-202-224-5323 na russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Senators who voted to support the (CDA) Communications Decency Act (They voted for the CDA and to curtail your free speech rights. Writing them an impolite and nasty letter would be a bad idea, and may soon be illegal under the CDA anyway. Take some time to cool down.) D ST Name (Party) Phone Fax = == ================== ============== ============== R AK Murkowski, Frank H. 1-202-224-6665 1-202-224-5301 R AK Stevens, Ted 1-202-224-3004 1-202-224-1044 D AL Heflin, Howell T. 1-202-224-4124 1-202-224-3149 R AL Shelby, Richard C. 1-202-224-5744 1-202-224-3416 D AR Bumpers, Dale 1-202-224-4843 1-202-224-6435 D AR Pryor, David 1-202-224-2353 1-202-224-8261 R AZ Kyl, Jon 1-202-224-4521 1-202-228-1239 R AZ McCain, John 1-202-224-2235 1-602-952-8702 D CA Boxer, Barbara 1-202-224-3553 na D CA Feinstein, Dianne 1-202-224-3841 1-202-228-3954 R CO Campbell, Ben N. 1-202-224-5852 1-202-225-0228 R CO Brown, Henry 1-202-224-5941 1-202-224-6471 D CT Dodd, Christopher J. 1-202-224-2823 na R DE Roth Jr. William V. 1-202-224-2441 1-202-224-2805 D FL Graham, Robert 1-202-224-3041 1-202-224-2237 R FL Mack, Connie 1-202-224-5274 1-202-224-8022 D GA Nunn, Samuel 1-202-224-3521 1-202-224-0072 R GA Coverdell, Paul 1-202-224-3643 1-202-228-3783 D HI Akaka, Daniel K. 1-202-224-6361 1-202-224-2126 D HI Inouye, Daniel K. 1-202-224-3934 1-202-224-6747 D IA Harkin, Thomas 1-202-224-3254 1-202-224-7431 R IA Grassley, Charles E. 1-202-224-3744 1-202-224-6020 R ID Craig, Larry E. 1-202-224-2752 1-202-224-2573 R ID Kempthorne, Dirk 1-202-224-6142 1-202-224-5893 R IN Coats, Daniel R. 1-202-224-5623 1-202-224-8964 R IN Lugar, Richard G. 1-202-224-4814 1-202-224-7877 R KS Dole, Robert 1-202-224-6521 1-202-224-8952 R KS Kassebaum, Nancy L. 1-202-224-4774 1-202-224-3514 D KY Ford, Wendell H. 1-202-224-4343 1-202-224-0046 R KY McConnell, Mitch 1-202-224-2541 1-202-224-2499 D LA Breaux, John B. 1-202-224-4623 na D LA Johnston, J. Bennett 1-202-224-5824 1-202-224-2952 D MA Kerry, John F. 1-202-224-2742 1-202-224-8525 D MD Mikulski, Barbara A. 1-202-224-4654 1-202-224-8858 D MD Sarbanes, Paul S. 1-202-224-4524 1-202-224-1651 R ME Snowe, Olympia 1-202-224-5344 1-202-224-6853 R ME Cohen, William S. 1-202-224-2523 1-202-224-2693 R MI Abraham, Spencer 1-202-224-4822 1-202-224-8834 R MN Grams, Rod 1-202-224-3244 na R MO Bond, Christopher S. 1-202-224-5721 1-202-224-8149 R MO Ashcroft, John 1-202-224-6154 na R MS Cochran, Thad 1-202-224-5054 1-202-224-3576 R MS Lott, Trent 1-202-224-6253 1-202-224-2262 D MT Baucus, Max 1-202-224-2651 na R MT Burns, Conrad R. 1-202-224-2644 1-202-224-8594 R NC Faircloth, D. M. 1-202-224-3154 1-202-224-7406 R NC Helms, Jesse 1-202-224-6342 1-202-224-7588 D ND Conrad, Kent 1-202-224-2043 1-202-224-7776 D ND Dorgan, Byron L. 1-202-224-2551 1-202-224-1193 D NE Kerrey, Bob 1-202-224-6551 1-202-224-7645 D NE Exon, J. J. 1-202-224-4224 1-202-224-5213 R NH Gregg, Judd 1-202-224-3324 1-202-224-4952 R NH Smith, Robert 1-202-224-2841 1-202-224-1353 D NJ Bradley, William 1-202-224-3224 1-202-224-8567 D NJ Lautenberg, Frank R. 1-202-224-4744 1-202-224-9707 R NM Domenici, Pete V. 1-202-224-6621 1-202-224-7371 D NV Bryan, Richard H. 1-202-224-6244 1-202-224-1867 D NV Reid, Harry 1-202-224-3542 1-202-224-7327 R NY D'Amato, Alfonse M. 1-202-224-6542 1-202-224-5871 R OH Dewine, Michael 1-202-224-2315 1-202-224-6519 R OK Inhofe, James 1-202-224-4721 R OK Nickles, Donald 1-202-224-5754 1-202-224-6008 R OR Hatfield, Mark O. 1-202-224-3753 1-202-224-0276 R OR Packwood, Robert 1-202-224-5244 1-202-228-3576 R PA Santorum, Rick 1-202-224-6324 na R PA Specter, Arlen 1-202-224-4254 1-717-782-4920 D RI Pell, Claiborne 1-202-224-4642 1-202-224-4680 D SC Hollings, Ernest F. 1-202-224-6121 1-202-224-4293 R SC Thurmond, Strom 1-202-224-5972 1-202-224-1300 D SD Daschle, Thomas A. 1-202-224-2321 1-202-224-2047 R SD Pressler, Larry 1-202-224-5842 1-202-224-1259* R TN Thompson, Fred 1-202-224-4944 1-202-228-3679 R TN Frist, Bill 1-202-224-3344 1-202-224-8062 R TX Hutchison, Kay Bailey 1-202-224-5922 1-202-224-0776 R TX Gramm, Phil 1-202-224-2934 1-202-228-2856 R UT Bennett, Robert 1-202-224-5444 1-202-224-6717 R UT Hatch, Orrin G. 1-202-224-5251 1-202-224-6331 R VA Warner, John W. 1-202-224-2023 1-202-224-6295 R WA Gorton, Slade 1-202-224-3441 1-202-224-9393 D WI Kohl, Herbert H. 1-202-224-5653 1-202-224-9787 D WV Byrd, Robert C. 1-202-224-3954 1-202-224-4025 D WV Rockefeller, John D. 1-202-224-6472 na R WY Simpson, Alan K. 1-202-224-3424 1-202-224-1315 R WY Thomas, Craig 1-202-224-6441 1-202-224-3230 Voters Telecommunications Watch / vtw(a)vtw.org . lunaslide On the meridian of time there is no injustice, only the poetry of motion creating the illusion of truth and drama. Henry Miller -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQBvAzD3EHEAAAEDAMVwZzXozPjX18mCenA5fJsdWZXcrhJCxPR+SoVCmR7d4ZVU mwITzPTHo/GyLvJrWyk5YdhheczyY2VSawaMrCN/nWA7K9lwAylbKyPxqBhRYJ3C 2wi2uD5LY2wypNOQyQARAQABtB5KZWZmIENvbm4gPGx1bmFzbGlkZUBsb29wLmNv bT6JAHUDBRAw+1bqS2NsMqTTkMkBAQkTAwCersFbCyk8O0MbGlNcZDAe24CLEWQ0 0C5EHni33W76UsG1bybcLsuMH6HVwLF7IqZivnzc7wkujYPQvCqn8HEYYTld8V9V Cou4dOvA8kV7rHvAn/LuLx7DRruLFrRoPSk= =OIT9 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0