- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Stop the presses -- Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
by JonWienk＠ix.netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Fri, 02 Aug 1996, jim bell <jimbell(a)pacifier.com> wrote: >At 07:48 PM 8/2/96 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote: >> and black and smokeless powder taggants. > >Such materials will be easy to defeat. Find an indoor shooting range, >vacuum up the powder residue that falls in front of the shooting stalls, >and you'll have a concentrated mixture of literally hundreds of types of >taggants. Add to bomb. Laughing, at this point, is optional. > >Jim Bell >jimbell(a)pacifier.com In addition to powder residue, collect all the spent shell casings you can, especially ones that are of the same caliber as weapons you own. In addition to the possibility of reloading them (and saving a bundle on ammo costs) you can sprinkle them around liberally in the aftermath of an encounter (assuming you survive) and give the crime scene people a bunch of red herrings to deal with. Of course, you should never touch them, (the FBI got DNA samples from stamps the Unabomber licked on his mailbombs, so even tiny droplets of sweat can bust you) and you should collect the actual brass fired and sandblast it. Incidentally, one of the interesting traits of a shotgun is that buckshot is not subject to the ballistics matching techniques used on rifle and pistol bullets. The plastic wads (which prevent the shot from touching the barrel) do not take the microscopically detailed impressions from the barrel that copper or lead bullets do. The heat from firing always melts the plastic slightly--enough to defeat this. Of course, if you leave the fired shells lying around, the primer and ejector marks can bite you... > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > > MICRON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ANNOUNCES AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL > AVIATION ADMINISTRATION > > Boise, Idaho, August 2, 1996 - Micron Communications, Inc., today > announced a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) > with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop a model > Positive Passenger Baggage Matching (PPBM) system. The objective > of this PPBM system is to automatically recognize when baggage has > been placed on an aircraft without an associated passenger. Of course, this means that every time they lose your luggage, you will be detained for "suspected terrorist activity", and the plane your luggage was wrongly sent to will be evacuated while the bomb squad takes it to a remote area and blows it up... (the luggage, not the plane) Jonathan Wienke "1935 will go down in history! For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead in the future!" --Adolf Hitler "46. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. ...Consider the following statement: I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government." --The 29 Palms Combat Arms Survey http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/Palms.htm 1935 Germany = 1996 U.S.? Key fingerprint = 30 F9 85 7F D2 75 4B C6 BC 79 87 3D 99 21 50 CB

4 3

Future US Postal History -- Indicium to Replace Stamps (fwd)
by jonathon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anybody else think this makes mail snooping a whole lot simpler? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:28:54 -0500 From: "Philatelic.Com Email Service" <post(a)philatelic.com> Subject: Future US Postal History -- Indicium to Replace Stamps To: post(a)philatelic.com Subject: Future US Postal History -- Indicium to Replace Stamps from: dreggen(a)accessnv.com Reference: Federal Computing Week Volume 10, No.l 29; July 29, 1996 Federal Computing Week (FCW) is a publication of FCW Government Technology Group 3110 Fairview Park Drive -- Suite 1040 Falls Church, VA 22042-4599 USA Tel: 703 - 876 - 5100 Fax: 703 - 876 - 5126 Page 19 USPS Proposed specifications would improve mail security by Colleen O'Hara The following is quote of one topic paragraph from the article: "Defining a Postmark One specification defines what a postmark, or evidence of postage, must look like. USPS has proposed that the new postmark contain a unique digital signature carried in a 2-D bar code. A new indicium substitutes for a postage stamp or postage meter impreint as evidence that postage was paid. Because of the information the indicium will contain, the agency will be better able to deter amil fraud as well as provide additional services, such as mail tracking and tracing, according to Roy Gordon, program manager for the agency's Information Based Indicia Program. 'USPS' inidtial strategy is to sample [letters] in the mail stream and scan on a random basis,' Gordon said. 'In the long term, it will scan 100 percent of the mail to deter fraud. The key is that it provides the USPS [with] the ability to provide additional services to carry that data with mail pieces.' " This whole article is probably a must read for anyone who is following or who is interested in what the postal history of the future will be like. Dale Eggen dreggen(a)accessnv.com ***************************************************************** People who do not give specific references are cowards who are trying to have an influence on peoples opinion by the manipulation of information to suit their own will. William Shakespear ***************************************************************** _____________________ PHILATELIC.COM-E-MAIL-SERVICE ____________________ * To reply in PRIVATE to the sender, you MUST use their email address. * Selecting REPLY will distribute a PUBLIC message. * Currently reaching over 300 Dealers and Collectors with your email post! __________________________________________________________________________ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.philatelic.com _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/

2 1

Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon
by Scott Schryvers 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>At 8:50 8/2/96, Paul J. Bell wrote: >An international phone call costs about 2 cents/min to produce. The average >rate paid for by the consumer is 62 cents. That's means the carriers mark >up this particular product by an amazing 3000%. > >Can you name another business that has comparable mark-ups? The Medical Industry. PGP encrypted mail preferred. E-Mail me for my key. Scott J. Schryvers <schryver(a)radiks.net>

3 2

More to be paranoid about...
by Alan Olsen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Take a look at: http://www.spiritone.com/cgi-bin/plates Feed it an Oregon licence plate number and it will feed you back all sorts of info about the person/victim. The uses for such things are only limited by an evil imagination... --- Alan Olsen -- alano(a)teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction `finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ "We had to destroy the Internet in order to save it." - Sen. Exon "Microsoft -- Nothing but NT promises."

1 0

WARNING: SecureDrive & PartitionMagic
by Geoffrey C. Grabow 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

It seems rather obvious now, but since I learned the hard way, I figured that I'd save the rest of you from a painful experience. I have one HD of 1.2gb. I created a 50mb partition at the end of the drive using PM and encrypted it with SD14b. I ran out of room on the secured partition and wanted to enlarge it. I used PM to shrink the primary partition a little, and to enlarge the secured partition. When I shrank the primary, the free space on the drive appeared between the two partitions. To enlarge the secondary, I moved it to the free space, then enlarged it on the right. This was BAD! PM did its thing, but no matter what I did after that, I couldn't get the secured partition to a usable state. I ended up formatting the secured partition to recover. After some playing, it seems that PM tries to "re-align" the data on the 2nd partition when you move left. That's where things get screwed up. I tested a few combinations, and found that everything works fine if you decrypt the partition before moving/resizing, then re-encrypt after. Just some friendly info. G.C.G. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Geoffrey C. Grabow | Great people talk about ideas. | | Oyster Bay, New York | Average people talk about things. | | gcg(a)pb.net | Small people talk about people. | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | PGP 2.6.2 public key available at http://www.pb.net/~wizard | | and on a plethora of key servers around the world. | | Fingerprint = A6 7B 67 D7 E9 96 37 7D E7 16 BD 5E F4 5A B2 E4 | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | That which does not kill us, makes us stranger. - Trevor Goodchild | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Re: Stop the presses -- Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
by Allen Robinson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Rather than resorting to such extreme measures as attacking the interior of the existing barrel with a file or nitric acid, simply replace the barrel with a new one (normally not prohibitively expensive), then put a few hundred rounds through the new barrel at the range so that it appears used when/if examined. Naturally this does not address the possibility of unique marks made on the primer by the firing pin, on the cartridge by the ejector, etc. AR #%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%#% "In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free." - Edward Gibbon ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Allen Robinson.........................sebago(a)earthlink.net PGP public key FE4A0A75 fingerprint 170FBC1F7609B76F 967F1CC8FCA7A41F

1 0

Re: "And who shall guard the guardians?"
by Arun Mehta 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 10:20 03/08/96 -0700, Martin Minow wrote: >Does the English Only bill conflict with the UN Declaration of >Human Rights (Article 2): .. >For that matter, does the escrowed crypto legislation conflict with >Article 12: .. >My understanding is that the United States is (finally) a signatory >to the Declaration. A couple of points need clarification: A Declaration isn't, in international law, binding. A covenant is, provided you haven't just signed it but also ratified it (i.e. made it a part of national law). So the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is basically just a statement of good intentions. Much more important, legally, is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), http://www.pluggedin.org/amnesty/rights4.htm which the US *ratified* not so long ago. Says the ICCPR Article 17 1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. 2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. Article 19 1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. 2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice. 3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary: (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals. ________ Key, in Article 17, is the term "unlawful." With this escape clause, the US gov has no problems, long as they make appropriate laws. Article 19 is more interesting, because restrictions must be shown to be necessary... Arun Mehta Phone +91-11-6841172, 6849103 amehta(a)cpsr.org http://www.cerfnet.com/~amehta/ finger amehta(a)cerfnet.com for public key

1 0

SAC_ard
by jya＠pipeline.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

August ScaAm has longish article on smart-cards by Carol Fancher, a Motorola engineer and developer of the smart- card market. ----- http://jya.com/sacard.txt (26 kb) Lynx: http://pwp.usa.pipeline.com/~jya/sacard.txt Via www.anonymizer.com SAC_ard

1 0

Re: Stop the presses -- Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 08:37 AM 8/4/96 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote: > >On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM asked: > >> Is there truth to the rumor that poking a file inside the barrel >> will alter the marks on future test firings? >I have heard, but have not evidence for, is that with use, these >characteristic markings change. As a result, putting 200-300 >rounds through a gun at the range is enough to alter its >identifiable barrel markings sufficiently to defeat forensic >matching. Don't know, just heard, but it sounds reasonable. Heard same thing here; it's almost certainly true. It would help if the gun got a thorough cleaning as well: You can "de-copper" a barrel by plugging one end, and filling the barrel with an ammonia solution. (this is available as a commercial product for guns, at wildly-inflated prices. Ordinary ammonia solution works just as well, cheap.) This dissolves the copper left from the passage of copper/brass-jacketed bullets. You can tell it's working: The copper forms the distinctive blue cupramine ion in solution. BTW, all this changes is the microstructure of the markings: The number of riflings and the twist of the riflings are, obviously, unchanged. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

1 0

Re: Stop the presses -- Anti-terrorism bill not that bad
by David.K.Merriman.-.webmaster＠toad.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com, sandfort(a)crl.com Date: Sun Aug 04 13:07:42 1996 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > SANDY SANDFORT > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > C'punks, > > On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM asked: > > > Is there truth to the rumor that poking a file inside the barrel > > will alter the marks on future test firings? > > I don't know the answer to this one, but my best guess is, > A) yes, but not enough to alter the test firing, and > B) whether or not it did, it would be strong evidence of an > attempt to screw up such a test. There are few (no?) legitimate > reasons to harm one's gun thusly. > > I have heard, but have not evidence for, is that with use, these > characteristic markings change. As a result, putting 200-300 > rounds through a gun at the range is enough to alter its > identifiable barrel markings sufficiently to defeat forensic > matching. Don't know, just heard, but it sounds reasonable. > > Considering the relative strengths/hardnesses of the metals involved (high-grade steel for barrel, lead and/or copper for projectile), I'd suspect that it would take more than 200-300 rounds to have any significant impact on the barrel rifling. This, of course, is for 'normal' weapons and ammo; using diamond projectiles in a saturday night special voids all warranties, express or implied :-) my ha'penny's worth. Dave Merriman PS - Been using Pronto Secure beta software the last couple of days for email. It's not Eudora, but *very* convenient for signing/encrypting. A couple of bugs/gotchas, but nothing I'd expect to see in for-sale version. I'm actually mildly impressed with how smoothly and transparently it works with PGP on a DOS/Win95 system. PGP Email welcome and encouraged. Visit my web site at http://www.shellback.com/p/merriman for my PGP key and fingerprint -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMgQwKsVrTvyYOzAZAQGacAP+L8CfV6aFmuAsJYTM5ttHqWu6B49vL2cx Ejnxwp2bRcM7winGALg+LQwwqjx1eNd1gKLsjrIRdh4oQgCBobfdEMU2poJvceTD shfPhvZqDWQQgZf0B1OkqzporGprdKM6V/rEbguzDMGt1SaUX585dZaYq5/CtyOO b+NFH+WSemc= =VWgA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0