- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: 10 minute delay considered inconsequential
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Wed, 11 Sep 1996 22:50:22 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote: >>I've always wondered if the makers of mailer software couldn't include a delay >>option, so that, say, a message might be held for 10 minutes and then sent. >>Imagine how many of the "Sorry about x; I meant y" posts we'd never see. > >I expect there would be little effect. I suspect most of us write articles, >send them out, and only notice the mistakes, typos, whatever when they are >pointed out. True. I guess what we need is an AI mailer that would do something like "Message #324 is rather confusing - did you really mean x?". Oh well. . . # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

Child pornography -- Expert witness for Federal jury trial
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Folks, I just got a call from two Federal Public Defenders whose client is charged with possession of child pornography stored in the /tmp directory of a Unix system, in a zip'd file. (These lawyers seem to be reasonably cyber-savvy, and told me they're following what I've been writing about cyber-liberties.) There's evidence saying that other people were using the account at that time, and the attorneys have the relevant wtmp/utmp files. There's also no evidence saying an actual child was exploited -- given the nature of the images, they may have been morphed. I don't think the defendant is accused of *making* them; he's only accused of *possessing* them. The case goes to jury trial soon in a Federal District Court. If anyone is interested in testifying as an expert witness in this case about Unix tech foo (and is qualified to do so), please let me know and I'll pass along your info. I believe at least your expenses would be paid. Here's an opportunity to ensure justice is done and not just rant in cyberspace... :) -Declan (Note I have no idea if the guy is indeed guilty of possessing JPGs the government has banned. What I do know is that any defendant deserves a fair trial and the government must prove that he's guilty of the crimes for which he's charged. And if anyone does molest a child, I say lock 'em up for a good long time.)

1 0

Re: common sense
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:04:14 -0700, HipCrime wrote: >> And rather than "dispensing drugs in clinics," why not simply >> scrap the drug laws entirely? People have a *right* to do as >> they please with their bodies. >Let's hear it for common sense. It's the first decent posting I've >seen to this list. Tell me, how do you walk with that huge chip on your shoulder? # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

CU foward post, netcopped again!
by paul＠fatmans.demon.co.uk 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> >what is being punished here is not the exploitation of children, which is > > wrong and must be prevented, but the private thoughts of those who > > produce and recieve this material, which are totally private and > > legitimate. > > There is nothing "legitimate" about fucking children, fantasising about > fucking children, or looking at pictures of people fucking children. > > The dangers of this debate are all too apparent, and if this sort of > quote were to reach the tabloid audience I hardly think it would be a > positive contribution to the image of CommUnity... Oh no! - I`ve been netcopped on the CommUnity list *AGAIN*, long live cypherpunks, the last bastion of free speech on the net!!!! ;-) But seriously, this does highlight what we are up against, when CommUnity (for US readers CommUnity, abreviated CU sometimes, is like a UK version of the EFF), supposedly a free speech and online liberties organisation, has posters (and this one is pretty typical) like this which clearly cover all debate on a subject area as "padophilia" if they try to explore the issues any more deeply than saying that fucking children is wrong... Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Http://www.fatmans.demon.co.uk/crypt/ "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.3ia mQCNAjH9j+cAAAEEAMBvREiQR0ot9dFCO0TiSCSunAYLv2g1Bc6I3bz8FzKXNH53 6mieJf/W4rD+CxJpT0q9RQaaoRtkHJLwbjfK2il3D7mEahMAyqvF/xRJNqkXfhM3 sRJM0Jh43l+W0M5vwokbEbk25/bxWWGspTsLD3YHbzKnG6pOcL5OPIRbv66xAAUR tCdQYXVsIEJyYWRsZXkgPHBhdWxAZmF0bWFucy5kZW1vbi5jby51az6JAJUDBRAy NwfvNkCBjDT0xHEBATQPA/9TORmN/UjNecj03q4anpvdyCLiez5sKuNbnYK50RiP Jj4QpWWvST3smyQ0A86DrZY/re056MXwQmARESx0rFZxdnD0oORICl5r8dJLIy3b j8rbA5olXwZwKz73/X5s13v/pvHYX4cIsbVK8NHXqh5llSKt6TBAuGgkIGF29z5k C4kAlQMFEDI3B9mdtf/umVkv7QEBcRYD/1FBteLqsUmr81euxqqnnrpLlyHb58B/ 9sdATuua4uSjX46hXDZ264YozspNrzSB4NEdrmXOWVX3fiE0ga6XkSSkIeF23V90 En37Z0BdbFzgF00FRYTFyTq8eezQrdg/+rBPUsZUmG5wpq3e12FKHQsX01i+1mB2 YmqqwCV5e95eiQCVAgUQMh8uSb5OPIRbv66xAQEqJwP/fxQyiCasjFcbDpsFfsYp put5cCC/9pOx6X3DlbKShPMpUOS+A9HsTEmJQN8Iawv1nSwPdtc2cR/GhW6ilVjW LSloGdMVLabm9pGpZZMkRaZlXFUkOv7VhfgsUiL+vIDryBCAwUZCzQiWycjt/cPi mUqFH41Z7NkyO8ZFdi5GGX0= =CMZA -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

Re: really undetectable crypto
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 12 Sep 96 19:26:56 -0700, Jim Miller wrote: >Most everybody on the list is familiar with the technique of hiding >encrypted messages in the LSBs of image files. Personally, I would not >use such a technique because don't I believe it's really undetectable. I >assume, without proof, that the LSBs of images files have statistical >properties that are sufficiently different from encrypted data that a >clever person could determine whether or not an image file contained an >imbedded encrypted message. Actually, if you use only a few bits - and not, say, bit 15 of *every* pixel - you can feel secure *IF* you are writing truly encrypted data. A regular PGP message has a bunch of header material that most certainly is not random-looking. OTOH, if you only write the raw data, then there is no way to differentiate from the random noise added by any scanner - in most cases, the last couple bits in each RGB triplet of a truecolor image are random. # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

DIMACS Trust management workshop, Sept 30 - Oct 2.
by Matt Blaze 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

------- Forwarded Message Received: from amontillado.research.att.com (amontillado.research.att.com [135.205.42.32]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24206 for <mab-local(a)nsa.research.att.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.research.att.com (research.research.att.com [135.205.32.20]) by amontillado.research.att.com (8.7.5/8.7) with SMTP id LAA14378 for <mab(a)issr.research.att.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:52:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns.research.att.com by research; Tue Sep 17 11:48:17 EDT 1996 Received: from henson.rutgers.edu by ns; Tue Sep 17 11:06:01 EDT 1996 Received: (from bquigley@localhost) by henson.rutgers.edu (8.6.12+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq+grosshack/8.6.12) id LAA26298; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:02:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:02:41 -0400 From: Barbara Quigley <bquigley(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu> Message-Id: <199609171502.LAA26298(a)henson.rutgers.edu> To: dimacs-members(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, local-list(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, dimacs-dimacs(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, dimacs-current-postdocs-industry(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, dimacs-current-postdocs-univ(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, dimacs-current-visitors(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, rutgers-list(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu, theorynt(a)vm1.nodak.edu, finite-model-theory(a)informatik.rwth-aachen.de Subject: DIMACS Workshop on Trust Management in Networks, Rutgers University, September 30 - October 2, 1996 DIMACS Workshop on Trust Management in Networks September 30 - October 2, 1996 DIMACS, Rutgers University - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Organizers: Ernie Brickell brickell(a)btec.com Joan Feigenbaum jf(a)research.att.com David Maher dpm(a)allegra.att.com Theme: The use of public-key cryptography on a mass-market scale requires sophisticated mechanisms for managing trust. For example, any application that receives a signed request for action is forced to answer the central question ``Is the key used to sign this request authorized to take this action?'' In certain applications, this question reduces to ``Does this key belong to this person?'' In others, the authorization question is considerably more complicated, and resolving it requires techniques for formulating security policies and security credentials, determining whether particular sets of credentials satisfy the relevant policies, and deferring trust to third parties. This workshop covers all aspects of the trust management problem. Relevant topics include but are not limited to: * General approaches to trust management * Languages, systems, and tools * Certificates and public-key infrastructure * Formal models and analysis * Trust management in specific application domains; including but not limited to: o Banking o E-mail o Internet commerce o Licensing o Medical information systems o Mobile programs and ``code signing'' o Revocation of cryptographic keys For more information: Information about local arrangements, travel, lodging and registration can be found at http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/Workshops/Management. Those without WWW access can contact Pat Pravato at 908-445-5929 or pravato(a)dimacs.rutgers.edu. This workshop is part of DIMACS Special Year on Networks. Information about the Special Year on Networks can be found at DIMACS WWW site: http://dimacs.rutgers.edu or by contacting the center. __________________ Program: Monday, September 30, 1996 8:15 Continental breakfast 9:00 Welcome to DIMACS Fred Roberts, DIMACS Director 9:15 What is "Trust Management," and what are the Workshop Goals? Joan Feigenbaum, AT&T Laboratories 9:45 Let a Thousand (Ten Thousand?) CAs Reign Stephen Kent, BBN Corporation 10:45 Break 11:00 The PolicyMaker Approach to Trust Management Matt Blaze, AT&T Laboratories (Joint work with J. Feigenbaum and J. Lacy) 12:00 Lunch 1:15 SDSI: A Simple Distributed Security Infrastructure Butler Lampson, Microsoft (Joint work with R. Rivest) 2:15 SPKI Certificates Carl Ellison, Cybercash 3:15 Break 3:45 Panel Discussion Moderator: David Maher, AT&T Laboratories Panelists: Blaze, Ellison, Kent, and Lampson 5:30 Wine and cheese Tuesday, October 1, 1996 8:15 Continental Breakfast 9:00 Using PICS Labels for Trust Management Rohit Khare, World Wide Web Consortium 9:30 Managing Trust in an Information-Labeling System Martin Strauss, Iowa State University (Joint work with M. Blaze, J. Feigenbaum, and P. Resnick) 10:00 Trust Management in Web Browsers, Present and Future Ed Felten, Princeton University (Joint work with D. Dean and D. Wallach) 10:30 Break 10:45 IBM Cryptolopes, SuperDistribution, and Digital Rights Management Marc A. Kaplan, IBM Watson Research Center 11:15 Requirements and Approaches for Electronic Licenses David Maher, AT&T Laboratories 11:45 PathServer Michael Reiter, AT&T Laboratories (Joint work with S. Stubblebine) 12:15 Lunch 1:30 Inferno Security David Presotto, Bell Labs -- Lucent Technologies 2:00 Transparent Internet E-mail Security Raph Levien, University of Calfornia at Berkeley (Joint work with L. McCarthy and M. Blaze) 2:30 Secure Digital Names Stuart Haber, Bellcore (Joint work with S. Stornetta) 3:00 Break 3:30 Untrusted Third Parties: Key Management for the Prudent Mark Lomas, Cambridge University (Joint work with B. Crispo) 4:00 Distributed Trust Management using Databases Trevor Jim, University of Pennsylvania (Joint work with C. Gunter) 4:30 Distributed Commerce Transactions: Structuring Multi-Party Exchanges into Pair-wise Exchanges Steven Ketchpel, Stanford University (Joint work with H. Garcia-Molina) Wednesday, October 2, 1996 8:15 Continental Breakfast 9:00 Policy-Controlled Cryptographic Key Release David McGrew, Trusted Information Systems, Inc. (Joint work with D. Branstad) 9:45 An X.509v3-based Public-Key Infrastructure for the Federal Government William Burr, Nat'l. Inst. of Standards and Technology 10:15 Break 10:30 The ICE-TEL Public-Key Infrastructure and Trust Model David Chadwick, Salford University 11:00 A Distributed Trust Model Alfarez Abdul-Rahman, University College, London (Joint work with S. Hailes) 11:30 On Multiple Statements from Trust Sources Raphael Yahalom, Hebrew University and MIT 12:00 Lunch 1:00 Off-line Delegation in a Distributed File Repository Arne Helme, University of Twente (Joint work with T. Stabell-Kul) 1:30 Operational Tradeoffs of Aggregating Attributes in Digital Certificates Ian Simpson, Carnegie Mellon University 2:00 Trust Management for Mobile Agents Vipin Swarup, Mitre (Joint work with W. Farmer and J. Guttman) 2:30 Break 3:00 Trust Management in ERLink Samuel Schaen, Mitre 3:30 Linking Trust with Network Reliability Y. Desmedt, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee (Joint work with M. Burmester) 4:00 Trust Management Under Law-Governed Interaction Naftaly Minsky, Rutgers University (Joint work with V. Ungureanu) 4:30 Tools for Security Policy Definition and Implementation Polar Humenn, Blackwatch Technology, Inc. ------- End of Forwarded Message

1 0

Re: (fwd) Email Robot draws fire from CypherPunkz
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Fri, 13 Sep 1996 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT), Declan McCullagh wrote: >The Cypherpunks gang has apparently attacked a San Francisco artist's ^^^^ No wonder the Feds want to close us down. Look at all the dangerous things we've done this week: 1. Shot the bull 2. (see #1) 3. (see #1) et cetra # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

Re: J'accuse!: Whitehouse and NSA vs. Panix and VTW
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:33:09 -0700, stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com wrote: >Anybody for an Internet Driver's License? *Surfer's* license. The newsies love to refer to "net surfing", because to the highly unknowledgable reader it makes it sound as if they have a clue about what they're writing on. # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

Re: Fed appellate judge remarks re anonymity, free speech on the net
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Fri, 13 Sep 1996 07:47:27 -0700 (PDT), Z.B. wrote: >> At 09:24 PM 9/12/96 -0700, zachb(a)netcom.com wrote: >> >> (Also in today's news, the 9th Circuit upheld a CA statute forbidding sales >> >> of material considered "harmful to minors" from vending machines.) >> > >> >Even if this statute is meant only to apply to cigarette machines, which >> >would seem to be the case given all of the anti-cig stuff going on now, >> >what good will it do? >> >> Whoops. Sorry. Wrong context. What I should have said was "the 9th Circuit >> upheld a CA statute forbidding sales of *printed* material considered >> 'harmful to minors' from unsupervised vending machines". The publication(s) >It's still mostly the same thing. I've never seen the type of machine >that you're talking about, and I don't think anyone would be dumb enough >to install one in a store that is near a school, or frequented my >minors. This law just does not seem like a very good idea. Where did you live? I used to walk home from school (in Ventura, CA - about 1 hour away from LA) and see a vending machine selling copies of "LA X-Press" (Or something like that) right next to the vending machines for the Star-Free Press and the LA Times. This was on the curb by a busy shopping center, on the block opposite of the County of Ventura's government center. Hypothetically, it was even plausibly deniable (the watchword of the Clintons) - "I was just buying this copy of the newspaper." And before someone asks, no, I wasn't buying them. # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0

Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.
by Adamsc＠io-online.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sat, 14 Sep 1996 21:08:58 +0200 (METDST), Asgaard wrote: >>The 70% already _are_ cutting the throats of the other 30%. It's called a >>60%+ tax rate. This is the sum of: federal income tax, state income tax, >Most of these taxes are not used for feeding the poor but to support >the Nomenclatura of the Bureaucracy and we all want to get rid of that. Quite true; I'd love to see the government run as a business, where some departments might run out of money 6 months early if they aren't careful. It'd be hard at first, but they'd have to change to survive... >standalone women to make babies to get benefits was very bad. The >Chinese system - less benefits the more children you have - is the >way to go. ++agree (Orwell also contributed other conventions. . .) >>(The point being that people want more than "basic food and shelter," but >>are often unwilling to make the commitments and sacrifices in their lives >>to gain the wherewithal to earn significant salaries.) >This is where we disagree. The real lazy ones are satisfied with a roof >over there heads, a microwave oven for cooking pizza, a six-pack and >a soap opera. Most people really do want to achieve something more in >their lives. How many of them are willing to go pick grapes for below minimum wage, since they've carefully avoided learning anything remotely useful? We have a ton of illegal immigrants who are quite willing to do so. The market is there, so why aren't they working? >>There is a basic error here, one that I see often. Who says that the >>"anarcho-capitalists" will freely give away, say, some vast fraction of >>their profits so as to subsidize the overall society? Any more so than the >Not a vast portion, if the above_basics capitalistic economy blooms. >Probably 10% would suffice - what was once paid to the church, the >institution that traditionally has supported the ill and poor. traditionally *raped* the ill and poor. Nothing wrong with true charity, but do you really think all the gold and art that (for instance) the Vatican acquired, much of it during the dark ages, was from giving contributions to the poor? Most of the time, they were the problem: "Give us money to buy absolution or your loved ones will rot in Hell forever!" # Chris Adams <adamsc(a)io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp # cadams(a)acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 "I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing, spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it." -- Duncan Frissell

1 0