- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Get the MONEY You Need
by moneyhelp＠mymail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GET THE MONEY YOU NEED RIGHT NOW! Here's your chance to... > Eliminate Credit Card Debt! > Escape from High Monthly Payments! > Get Relief and Have the Money You Need! > Cash in Your Pocket Usually within 7 to 14 days! > Make Home Improvements You've Always Wanted! > Take the Vacation You Deserve! How? Simply CLICK HERE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE! or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Would you like money for... ~ A New Car? ~ College Tuition? ~ Taxes? ~ Consolidate Your Credit Cards? ~ A Dream Vacation? ~ Home Improvements? Now It Can Be Yours! What are you waiting for? For a FREE evaluation please visit our website by... CLICKING HERE (http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html) or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Especially if you're a homeowner, we can help you. Try us!

1 0

Jim Bell Violation Update
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Bell was released on parole on April 20, but may be about to be rearrested for parole violation, and may not yet know the cops are coming to reviolate: http://jya.com/jdb062198.htm

1 0

Eric Young: Zimmerman redux?
by Trei, Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: 20 Jun 1998 18:40:14 -0000 From: Julian Assange <proff(a)iq.org> To: ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk With things starting to heat up here in Australia (DoD/DSD has recently taken to making some exceptionally nasty noises about prosecuting Eric Young, Tim Hudson and the rest of the Australian CryptoMozilla team). I'd like to remind everyone who's interested in aussie/nz crypto issues of the aucrypto mailing list. <snip> Australasian & Pacific Cryptography mail the word "subscribe" to aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net

2 1

#cypherpunks open
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

#cypherpunks is open on EFnet. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

1 0

Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - June 22, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door?
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To all: Word is the PGP is being dropped as a standard and NAI converting over to x.509 throughout product line. However the info is vague wnough to mean alot of things:) sorrin NETWORK ASSOCIATES AND VERISIGN PARTNER TO PROVIDE INTEROPERABLE 6/22/98 13:18 Digital Certificate Solutions to Millions of Users Worldwide Partnership Provides Customers Choice of Leading Certificate Formats, Enabling Widespread Secure Internet Business Transactions MOUNTAIN VIEW and SANTA CLARA, Calif., June 22 /PRNewswire/ -- VeriSign, Inc. (Nasdaq: VRSN), and Network Associates (Nasdaq: NETA), today announced a broad reaching partnership to enable cross product support and promotion of each company's digital certificate-based security solutions. This partnership will provide customers with a flexible security solution that encompasses best-of-breed products and technologies -- enabling secure global electronic commerce and business-to-business communications on a larger scale than ever before. With this announcement, Network Associates and VeriSign can tap into the world's largest community of certificate holders made up of over one thousand five hundred enterprises and nearly nine million individuals throughout the world. This integration of the world's leading certificate technologies will enable businesses to utilize their choice of certificate formats while conducting secure Internet transactions such as: exchanging secure e-mail, establishing virtual private networks, and authorized access to confidential corporate data. Network Associates and VeriSign customers will now be able to establish combined PKI solutions covering the complete lifecycle of certificates from issuance and usage through renewal, expiration, or revocation. The first commercial offering from this collaboration will be interoperable between the Gauntlet GVPN product and VeriSign OnSite for IPSEC, which will be available in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter VeriSign's OnSite service and toolkit will be enhanced to issue DSA X.509 certificates in addition to its RSA X.509 certificates, and Network Associates' Net Tools Secure, including their industry leading PGP encryption products, will be updated to request and use either type of certificate. "By joining the two largest players in the industry to ensure that our customers' security applications are seamlessly compatible, we are fueling the growth of electronic commerce and secure communications on the Internet," said Peter Watkins general manager of the Net Tools Secure division at Network Associates. "We are pleased to offer VeriSign as our preferred provider of digital certificate services. Together, we are the only two companies to support the full range of certificate standards -- giving customers the power of choice when implementing their open, certificate-based security solutions." "We are extremely pleased to work with Network Associates to bring enterprise customers a clear best-of-breed solution," said Stratton Sclavos, president and CEO of VeriSign. "With this partnership, users of Network Associates' desktop and server encryption applications can simply obtain their choice of digital certificates to establish a fully functional, interoperable PKI through the use of OnSite." "The announcement from VeriSign and Network Associates is a win-win situation for Information Systems (IS) decision makers," said Jim Hurley, director of information security at Aberdeen Group, a Boston-based IS market-research, consulting and analysis firm. "One supplier helps IS managers by managing risk while the other helps IS managers by enabling safe interconnections with suppliers, partners and customers for mission business-procedures. Interoperable and seamless support between these supplier's products is the kind of partnership that IS executives will reward." VeriSign OnSite, a state of the art digital certificate solution that enables organizations to quickly and easily establish themselves as a certificate authority, is available today for client and server digital certificates and will be available for IPSec digital certificates in the third quarter. VeriSign OnSite pricing begins at $4995 for 1000 client certificates. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure suite is the industry's most comprehensive set of security products encompassing enterprise encryption, authentication, intrusion detection, audit analysis, anti-virus, firewall, global virtual private network and network vulnerability assessment. Net Tools Secure is available now and is priced at $49 per user for 5000 users. Network Associates, Inc. With headquarters in Santa Clara, California, Network Associates, Inc., formed by the merger of McAfee Associates and Network General, is a leading supplier of enterprise network security and management solutions. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager offer best-of-breed, suite-based network security and management solutions. Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager suites combine to create Net Tools, which centralizes these point solutions within an easy-to-use, integrated systems management environment. For more information, Network Associates can be reached at 408-988-3832 or on the Internet at http://www.nai.com. VeriSign, Inc. is the leading provider of digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks. VeriSign's Digital IDs and Secure Server IDs are available through the company's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. VeriSign's E-Commerce Solutions are used by enterprises to deploy complete Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solutions for intranets, extranets, and large-scale electronic commerce applications, and are available through VeriSign regional account representatives or through VeriSign resellers. For more information visit VeriSign's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. SOURCE Network Associates, Inc. -0- 06/22/98 /CONTACT: Nathan Tyler of Copithorne & Bellows, 415-975-2223, for Network Associates; or Kelly Ryan of VeriSign, 650-429-3424/ /Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com or fax, 800-758-5804, ext. 124004/ /Web site: http://www.verisign.com http://www.nai.com/ (NETA VRSN) CO: Network Associates, Inc.; VeriSign, Inc. ST: California IN: CPR MLM SU: PDT -0- (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 EOS (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 86 -0- (PRN) Jun/22/ 98 13:18

1 0

Entrust goes Public
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Entrust filed to go public.

1 0

Just for You
by Nicole 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000"><FONT COLOR="#00FFFF" SIZE=3> Hi... This message is meant for Adults over the age of 21, If you have received this message in error, please delet it now and accept our appologies. I would like to tell of about this great sex site on the web, offering everything you will ever desire. It has live sex chat and a live sex xhow from Amsterdam. Go and check it out. http://www.sex4u.net/ Love Anna </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3>

1 0

Blood Sausage -- SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

BloodSausage HogLog - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! ___________________________________________________ "The lives of Frank, Gambino, Morel and Serafini ended on the gallows of Montreal's Bordeaux Jail on October 24, 1924. Valentino and Davis had their executions commuted at the last minute." "No one claimed Frank, Gambino and Valentino were among the half-dozen gunmen who ambushed the bank car, but prosecutorn R.L. Calder argued they were still guilty of murder because of the organized nature of the crime." ~Excerpts from "Blood Brothers" by Peter Edwards. MeTheSheeple was glad to learn that these vile, criminal scumbags, fingered by the person who had actually planned and committed the crime, were held accountable for the actions alleged to them by the gang-leader whose life was spared in return for ratting out alleged coconspirators. I was particularly happy because I knew that the same high standards of justice would undoubtedly be applied to the criminal scum within the Canadian Justice System under whose PigSkin Umbrella the Montreal Mobsters ruled the streets and the citizens who walked them. "Testimony at the Frank robbery trial showed that police routinely sipped coffee with hoods and that Montreal's finest had been tipped off to the armoured car hold-up well in advance, but did nothing." Supreme Court of Canada Justice Louise Coderre (with a left-handed frog-tongue over the first 'e') said, "Vice has spread itself across the city with an ugliness that seemed assured of impunity." Rather than bore you with all of the details behind the criminal scumbag PigsWithBadgesAndGuns being also found 'GUILT OF MURDER BECAUSE OF THE ORGANIZED NATURE OF THE CRIME', I will just skip ahead in the book and report on the final outcome of <trumpets blare> JUSTICE <flags fly> in the case of the police and city officials discovered to have greased the wheels of organized crime in their activities of drug dealing, robbery, murder, etc. Hmmm....nope...nada....maybe...nope...nope... Surprise, surprise! It seems that, following the Coderre probe, "nothing happened that seriously threatened the criminals' take. The name of Cadiex Street was changed to de Bullion Street after a New ork play made the old name notorious, but along the same pavement the same crimes continued." Those without my cynical psychological make-up will undoubtedly be able to supply you with reasons as to just why the local citizens felt extremely 'served and protected' when they came to after being mugged and saw the new street signs, however, I will merely take a short break, here, have a good dump, and wipe my butt with yet another page of the Criminal Code of Canada. And Silk Badges..?: "I know who the real public enemies are. But they are men who have the respect of the public; men who wear silk hats, who are apparently of standing in the community." ~1930's Montreal MobBuster, J.J. Penverne (with no frog-licks in his name...) Peter Edwards provides the standard journalistic explaination as to how "The term 'Mafia,' in its truest form, refers only to organized crime in western Sicily." and explains how it has been expanded to encompass any pair of teenagers throwing a rock through a window, as long as one of them has an Italian name. He neglects to explain, as some journalists do, that the word "Mafia" is becoming increasingly generic, now including the 'Lebanese Mafia', the 'Columbian Mafia', etc. *All* journalists, however, seem unable to explain why they continue to avoid naming the continuing organized forces of armed domination over citizens of *all* ethnic groups the 'Government Mafia'... "Blood Brothers" is not the first book to point out that at the heart of the "honoured society of Calabria" lies the concept of "omerta" (with a right-handed strand of spaghetti over the 'a'). Nor is it the first book to fail to point out that omerta's "double code of conduct that set different moral codes for dealings with those inside and outside one's family circle" applies not only to Officially Recognized Criminal ScumBag Organizations, but also to almost every 'gang' larger than a Cult Of One from the PTA to the CIA to the USA. 'Omerta' decrees that when the president of the PTA molests a child, when the head of the CIA commits treason, when the president of the USA declares that US citizens will continue to face imprisonment for exporting the same strength of encryption that their government is sharing with Communist China, that a street somewhere be renamed, while everything else continues on pretty much as before. Don't hold your breath waiting for mainstream journalists to upset the BadAppleCart by referring to the 'PTA Mafia' when they deem that your child should be forced to attend school with a child who can murder them by biting them, while teaching them that you are a dangerous psycho because of your gun ownership; or to the 'FBI Mafia' when they murder a mother and child in attempts to cover their previous unannounced, botched armed assault on a citizen being charged with civil crimes in an attempt to persuade him to invent crimes against his friends, whether they were Jewish or not; or to the 'Government Mafia' when they spend millions of dollars investigating and/or charging Phil Zimmerman, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Jim Bell, knowing that the bottomless taxpayer pockets funding their legally unjustified harassment will guarantee at least moderately successful results, even if the end result is dropping the matter when the multi- million dollar stench begins blowing back toward DC. Do not expect mainstream journalists to refer to the 'ASPCA Mafia' when they release a hastily composed 'history' of TruthMongrel as a rabid, sharp-toothed, human baby conniseur, after HeOrShe is cut down by FBI gunfire on Mayonaisse Mountain during attempts to arrest the Author on 'Dog At Large' charges filed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Bienfait, Sask. Silk? We Don't Need No Stinking Silk...: The multi-facted PigsEar WebSites that are increasingly being turned into InterNet Cult of One SilkPurses through the increasingly efficient and powerful shareware digital bread-slicers available to Jane and Joe Sheeple in their quest to serve either God, Mammon, Dog or Mammy, according to their prediliction, have the capacity, if uncensored and uncontrolled, of allowing the individual to rekindle the creative spark of individuality that reminds them that the word 'WE' should only be used by Kings, Priests, and people with tapeworms. People with the ability to think for themselves; people who know that if Timothy McVeigh was really the 'Muenster' that the mainstream media claimed, then he would have been in the 'Adams Family' movie; people who demand to know if Monica Lewinski has a 'bent' pussy; people with conspiring minds, who want to 'snow'; people who are not afraid to stand up and cheer for the Officially Recognized BadGuys on 'Cops' and 'World's Scariest Innocent Bystander Threatening Police Chases'; people watching 'World's Dumbest Criminals' who slap their forehead and say, "I hate it when that happens..." People who read the Bienfait Nutly News.

1 0