- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

None
by Ken Brown 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> I think you hit the nail on the head here. For most USAns these days the > word "socialism" doesn't really mean anything specific Socialism: state intervention in private transactions. By extension, any state is socialist, or it's not really a state, but a company in the defense (and maybe law) business. Mark

1 0

[i2p] weekly status notes [jan 25]
by jrandom 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi y'all, quick weekly status update * Index 1) 0.5 status 2) sam.net 3) gcj progress 4) udp 5) ??? * 1) 0.5 status Over the past week, there's been a lot of progress on the 0.5 side. The issues we were discussing before have been resolved, dramatically simplifying the crypto and removing the tunnel looping issue. The new technique [1] has been implemented and the unit tests are in place. Next up I'm putting together more of the code to … [View More]integrate those tunnels into the main router, then build up the tunnel management and pooling infrastructure. After thats in place, we'll run it through the sim and eventually onto a parallel net to burn it in before wrapping a bow on it and calling it 0.5. [1]http://dev.i2p.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/i2p/router/doc/tunnel-alt.html?rev=H EAD * 2) sam.net smeghead has put together a new port of the SAM protocol to .net - c#, mono/gnu.NET compatible (yay smeghead!). This is in cvs under i2p/apps/sam/csharp/ with nant and other helpers - now all y'all .net devs can start hacking with i2p :) * 3) gcj progress smeghead is definitely on a tear - at last count, with some modifications the router is compiling under the latest gcj [2] build (w00t!). It still doesn't work yet, but the modifications to work around gcj's confusion with some inner class constructs is definitely progress. Perhaps smeghead can give us an update? [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ * 4) udp Not much to say here, though Nightblade did bring up an interesting set of concerns [3] on the forum asking why we're going with UDP. If you've got similar concerns or have other suggestions on how we can address the issues I replied with, please, chime in! [3] http://forum.i2p.net/viewtopic.php?t=280 * 5) ??? Yeah, ok, I'm late with the notes again, dock my pay ;) Anyway, lots going on, so either swing by the channel for the meeting, check the posted logs afterwards, or post up on the list if you've got something to say. Oh, as an aside, I've given in and started up a blog within i2p [4]. =jr [4] http://jrandom.dev.i2p/ (key in http://dev.i2p.net/i2p/hosts.txt) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB9r1VGnFL2th344YRAvb5AJ9+Y5l9JZOo5znrnY2sunAr0lOJzgCghHpy W/EO4gPSteZWp+rBogWfB3M= =nnfw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ i2p mailing list i2p(a)i2p.net http://i2p.dnsalias.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] [View Less]

1 0