- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

9/10 Global MLM - Network Leaders
by Gerry Wyatt 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

Are you in Network marketing? - Beware - THIS WILL BLOW YOUR SOCKS OFF WE UNCOVER THEIR CLAIMS, THEY SAY!!! The biggest corporate MLM launch for years 9/10 worldwide MLM leaders hearing about this are signing up Worldwide MLM leaders are concentrating on this Pre-launch 3 weeks from now 4 years to develop a truly huge technology platform Development costs alone are $ 15 MILLION Current value $ 25 MILLION (valued by Ernst & Young) They claim the size of their organisation & its affiliates is the Coca-Cola of their industry The products have global appeal from day 1 They also boast of an ideal combination of internet & conventional marketing Unrivalled support from their company structure Demand from 90% of world population Personal website (multi language translatable) to support your marketing AND they say the product is unique and not available anywhere AND IT IS ALL TRUE Be in at the beginning Time is not everything. but it can make all the difference URGENT WARNING -DO NOT MISS THIS ACT NOW Email: gerry.wyatt(a)talk21.com or call (001) 360 3517847 & leave full contact details I have contacted you as have been identified as being involved as a top networker We want your life to be better financially & socially than before The most important question to ask yourself now ? Would you like to have earned a proportion of everything spent on an AMEX cards during past 20 years? ? Would you like to have a product 90% of world needs but cannot get & get compensated from providing it for them? ? Would you like to earn more money easily & can spare from 2 hours per week? I must stress that to be in a prime position you must come back to me by return with your name, address and telephone number There will only be 60 key leaders worldwide SO have a look and come straight back to me ************************************************************************ This email was sent to you as your address was either on an email I received or we were under the impression that you are open minded, want to maximise and appreciate serious opportunities that mean the best change in life. THEREFORE WE WANT YOU To never receive anything from me again please put REMOVE in the subject line and reply or call 001 36 323 0422 & thank you for your time. ************************************************************************************

1 0

Re: Pap Smear
by Eugene Leitl 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > Except if the virus code is well known, and deemed trustworthy. Any code can clean up after itself, leaving a well-known "trustworthy" code behind. I'm a bit boggled at seeing "virus" and "trustworthy" in the same sentence. -- Eugen* Leitl ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

1 0

RE: Automatic's
by Jonathan Wienke 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I can fire 9 shots in about 4 seconds and stay in the 9 ring of a B-27 silhouette at 10 yards, and slow fire I can neatly remove the X-ring at the same distance...I don't think it would be a bad option against an armored opponent--2 in the body to knock them on their behind, then one more between the eyes to finish things. The only real drawback is the muzzle flash would be a problem in the dark. With the standard 6 inch barrel, the flame is about a foot in diameter and 2-3 feet long with some loads. Now when I attach the 14" barrel with the scope, I can put 5 shots in about 2 inches at 50 yards, and the muzzle flash is greatly reduced due to the increased barrel length. It is definitely on the heavy and bulky side for concealed carry, but I wouldn't agree that it is impractical. - -----Original Message----- From: David Honig [mailto:honig@sprynet.com] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:43 PM To: Jonathan Wienke; 'Morris Allen'; cypherpunks(a)einstein.ssz.com Subject: RE: Automatic's At 11:53 AM 6/7/01 -0700, Jonathan Wienke wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >They used I.M.I. Desert Eagles chambered for .50 Action Express. I >have one in .44 Magnum, made in Israel, imported by Magnum Research, >Inc. Those are typical Hollywood guns, largely impractical. Cool looking, certainly. Now a Barrett in .50... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOyFa0Rj6oMyeDxZoEQJnwwCfcSW9Uy885ukVnPtmduGtuGJNcnoAoLfQ 9+36TGdjCG/QooJ4FDhHCgos =IbCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

12 19

Re: Entire ISP Forced to Close
by Bill Stewart 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

At 11:50 AM 05/16/2001 -0700, Eric Cordian wrote: >Jim Dixon wrote: > >> Still, the Internet is for the most part a Star Network, with only the > >> very largest providers multi-homed. > > > This is not true, unless your definition of 'the very largest' is very > > loose indeed. There are many thousands of multi-homed ISPs. People > > periodically attempt to draw graphs of the relationships between > > ISPs. If you look at these you see nothing similar to a star network. > >This hasn't been my experience here in the US. I am familiar with about >10 ISPs, from small mom and pop operations, to mid-size regional >providers. > >The smallest ones have a single line. Even a pretty big ISP can run on a >single OC3, with a backup DS3. Most of my experience is with big backbone providers, big enterprises, web hosting services, and very small ISPs. Early on, there were three main backbone providers - MCI, UUNET, Sprint - and a small ISP would buy their first T1 feed from MCI (cheapest), and as soon as they could justify a second T1, they'd buy it from one of the other providers so that hopefully there wouldn't be bad routing instabilities on both at the same time. Things have gotten much more reliable, but also much bigger, and most ISPs still buy diverse connections when they need more than one. Almost every web hosting ad talks about having multiple connections, whether that's 2 T3s or 2 OC12s to different backbones, because you still need it for reliability. If you're out of service for a day, you lose customers, fast, while if your performance is doggy for a day, they'll usually stick around. Having N thousand small ISPs, and hundreds of small web hosting businesses, plus dozens of big ISPs and hosting services means there's lots of competition - if you provide undependable service, people will leave, unless they're somewhere geographically special or have other special issues. >There are a few with a handful of OC12 and OC3 circuits, but these were >generally obtained for specific customers. >I can't imagine an ISP with 50+ distinct peers, with separate circuits >to each. Most non-huge US ISPs don't have large numbers of physical peering circuits, but ISPs that use the public exchange points or carrier hotels often peer with a number of other ISPs, because that either requires just administrative agreements (on a routed exchange point) or additional PVCs (on an ATM exchange point.) Some exchange points work by everybody peering with the exchange rather than with each other, but it's a similar effect.

1 0

FREE P**sy - Filthy Smut - Todays FREE Pics!=> cypherpunks@toad.com
by editor＠newsletter.join4free.com 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

AOL USERS: <a href="http://www.join4free.com/a/daily">Click Here For Join4Free's Daily Source Of FREE XXX Erotica!</a> Join4Free Daily Is Here: http://www.join4free.com/a/daily ************************************************************************************************************* Note: this is not a spam email. This email was sent to you because your email was entered in on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, please use the link below to unsubscribe: http://www.join4free.com/cancel.html?p=cypherpunks&job=992313229&email=cyph… and you will *never* receive another email from us! XXX9644868 *************************************************************************************************************

1 0

Thought-A-Day
by Fountain Of Joy 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

"Those who think they can and those who think they can't are both right." --by Henry Ford ***************************************************************************** Your name has been recommended to receive thoughts of wisdom from Fountain of Joy. These thoughts will be delivered, free of cost, to your desktop, everyday, for an initial evaluation period. We believe that the meaningful insights of these carefully selected thoughts will make your life peaceful, successful & happy in a way you had never imagined before. If you would like your near and dear ones to receive these thoughts which can change their lives, please send their email addresses to amaha(a)vsnl.net We apologise if this email is received by you in error.If you desire to unsubscribe, reply to this email with 'remove' in the subject line. ----Director, Fountain of Joy

1 0

Thought-A-Day
by Fountain Of Joy 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

"Those who think they can and those who think they can't are both right." --by Henry Ford ***************************************************************************** Your name has been recommended to receive thoughts of wisdom from Fountain of Joy. These thoughts will be delivered, free of cost, to your desktop, everyday, for an initial evaluation period. We believe that the meaningful insights of these carefully selected thoughts will make your life peaceful, successful & happy in a way you had never imagined before. If you would like your near and dear ones to receive these thoughts which can change their lives, please send their email addresses to amaha(a)vsnl.net We apologise if this email is received by you in error.If you desire to unsubscribe, reply to this email with 'remove' in the subject line. ----Director, Fountain of Joy

1 0

Re: SSNs
by Anonymous 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

I wrote: > I am an American citizen. > > In 30 years I have never given a valid social security number to > anyone. > > I can't. > > I don't have one. > > I hold a regular high-paying job. I get a paycheck. My employer > uses ADP. I have a driver's license. I have a bank account. > I have good health insurance. I pay my taxes. > > Not once have I had a real problem. Any minor problems that have > come up over the years, and there have been very few, always go away > when ignored dilligently. > > Just give those facists a fake number. > > Good luck. > > Signed, > > 322-33-0007 >In response Harmon Seaver <hseaver(a)ameritech.net> said: >So for 30 you've been paying in to SS, but you'll never collect, nor >could you collect unemployment if laid off --- you like making large >donations to the government? I guess I have a hard time seeing what >the point is. And yes, I understand all the arguments over the years >about "national ID" and all that, and I can understand if someone >works for himself and *doesn't" pay in to the SS system, but .... I reply: Unlike you, I am not under the delusion that I will ever see any of my SS contributions back. I'm not interested in government unemployment benefits. I was unemployed for a few months back when. It never even occurred to me to seek unemployment benefits. Even if it had I wouldn't have bothered. "Large donations to the government." I have a hard time understanding that. Social Security is a TAX. Period. If you believe otherwise it's because some good salesmen (spin doctors) have told you so. It's not voluntary- therefore not a "donation" and I'd barely make 2% on it if I bothered to make a claim in 20-40 years. Who cares? I prefer to file for 17 dependent exemptions, put the extra money from my biweekly paycheck in a fund and then pay the principal back in April and keep the interest for myself- that's a little naughtier though. I get far more out of that then I ever will from Social Security. It's a TAX. Period. I'm not looking to commit tax fraud. I'll pay it like my other taxes. Still, I'm not going to let someone destroy my privacy because I am under the delusion that I somehow will see my SS contributions some undefined day more than two or three decades hence.

1 0

EXCELLENT NEW WEB BOARD!! CHECK IT OUT :)
by CEREBRAL ASSASSIN 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

1 0

SCOTUS rulz! (fwd)
by Jim Choate 12 Jun '01

12 Jun '01

Where did that scum bag Scalia get the 'in general public use' test? Geez, these guys make it up as they go along... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:25:19 -0400 (EDT) From: George(a)Orwellian.Org Reply-To: cypherpunks(a)ssz.com To: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net Subject: CDR: SCOTUS rulz! http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Scotus-Heat-Detector.html # # June 11, 2001 # # Court Rules Against Heat-Sensor Searches # # Filed at 11:03 a.m. ET # # WASHINGTON (AP) -- Police violate the Constitution if they use # a heat-sensing device to peer inside a home without a search # warrant, the Supreme Court ruled Monday. # # An unusual lineup of five justices voted to bolster the Fourth # Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and threw # out an Oregon man's conviction for growing marijuana. # # Monday's ruling reversed a lower court decision that said # officers' use of a heat-sensing device was not a search of Danny # Lee Kyllo's home and therefore they did not need a search warrant. # # In an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, by many measures # the most conservative member of the court, the majority found # that the heat detector allowed police to see things they otherwise # could not. # # ``Where, as here, the government uses a device that is not in # general public use to explore details of the home that would # previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the # surveillance is a 'search' and is presumptively unreasonable # without a warrant,'' Scalia wrote. # # While the court has previously approved some warrantless searches, # this one did not meet tests the court has previously set, Scalia # wrote. # # The decision means the information police gathered with the # thermal device -- namely a suspicious pattern of hot spots on # the home's exterior walls -- cannot be used against Kyllo. # # The court sent the case back to lower courts to determine whether # police have enough other basis to support the search warrant # that was eventually served on Kyllo, and thus whether any of # the evidence inside his home can be used against him. # # Justices Clarence Thomas, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg # and Stephen Breyer joined the majority. # # Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion joined by # Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Justices Sandra Day # O'Connor and Anthony M. Kennedy. -- ____________________________________________________________________ "...where annual election ends, tyranny begins;" Thomas Jefferson & Samuel Adams The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

4 3