- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

BBC report: Mata Hari "was framed"; possible new trial
by auto301094＠hushmail.com 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- "Sacrificed": Leon Schirmann is convinced she was sacrificed by the French authorities in a bid to whip up patriotic fervour..." http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1602000/1602486.stm Mata Hari "was framed" By Hugh Schofield in Paris Tuesday, 16 October, 2001, 12:22 GMT 13:22 UK The French Government is considering a request to re-open the case of Mata Hari, the Dutch-born erotic dancer who charmed her way into European society before being shot as a spy in World War I. Two plaintiffs - Mata Hari's home town of Leeuwarden in the Netherlands and the Mata Hari Foundation - have lodged an official plea at the Ministry of Justice in Paris, asking for a review of her 1917 trial. They say new evidence has come to light that shows she was convicted on trumped- up charges. "We can show that the elements that led to her condemnation do not hold together," said lawyer Thibault de Montbrial, who presented the suit. "France would stand taller if it seriously re-examined its judicial history." Erotic dancing The story of Mata Hari-- born Margaretha Zelle in 1876-- has passed into modern- day legend. The daughter of a Dutch hat-seller and a Javanese mother, at the age of 19 she married a Scottish captain, left him seven years later and then set out for Paris to seek her fortune in the early years of the last century. Her highly suggestive and near-naked dances took the "haut monde" by storm. MI5 decided to keep tabs "She didn't exactly dance; but she knew how to remove her clothes piece by piece and move her long, proud, dusky body," wrote the French authoress Colette. She became famous across Europe and took a succession of well-connected lovers, but when World War I broke out she found herself stranded in Berlin. Her theatrical triumphs were on hold, and the money began to dry up. A year later, back in the Netherlands and bored, she was approached by German intelligence, who believed she would have privileged access to top-level circles in Paris, and asked to become a spy. She accepted and became Agent H21. But she was never any good at it. Mata Hari was not made to be a spy--she was simply a woman who liked to get the most out of life--Campaigner Leon Schirmann When she moved to Paris, the British and French secret services immediately blew her cover, and in 1916 she swapped sides and agreed to work for the French. They dispatched her to Madrid to seduce the German military attache there, a Major Kelle. It was he who brought about her execution. Telegrams he sent back to Berlin-- which were intercepted by the French-- suggested that H21 was back working for the Germans. Mata Hari was arrested on a train in February 1917, tried and shot by a firing squad outside Paris on 15 October. Nearly a century later painstaking research by a 92-year-old French resistance veteran has given substance to the long-standing doubts about the conviction. 'Sacrificed' Leon Schirmann is convinced she was sacrificed by the French authorities in a bid to whip up patriotic fervour. "Mata Hari was not made to be a spy. They used her as part of an anti-German propaganda campaign. She was simply a woman who liked to get the most out of life, and she didn't realise that with the war everything changed," she said. Digging through French, German and Dutch archives, Mr Schirmann has unearthed two vital new elements. First he claims he can show that the German military attache-- Major Kelle-- deliberately delivered Mata Hari to the French. He knew that his telegram would be intercepted by the French, so he filled it with incriminating information, implying that she was an extremely valuable German source--even though intelligence reports from Berlin showed she was almost useless. Missing head Second, Mr Schirmann says that officials from French counter-intelligence, the "deuxieme bureau", lied under oath at her trial. They accused Mata Hari of fabricating some of her testimony, even though they were well aware it was true. Under French law for a "trial review" to succeed, important new pieces of evidence need to be presented. The Justice Ministry said Mata Hari's case would be "studied-- like any other." After she was shot in the Bois de Vincennes, Mata Hari's head was removed and for many years kept--along with those of other celebrity criminals-- in Paris's museum of anatomy. A year ago researchers were baffled to discover it had gone missing. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0 wl8EARECAB8FAjvMlQoYHGF1dG8zMDEwOTRAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEKadvsVlUK4P B/cAoJ4CMZgMratuJJk73NBritdNdXSlAJ9eejUtTIKc4B7ewjvVVXETRXmXHA== =B6sz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Internation Patent Law doesn't apply to USG?
by Tim May 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 02:45 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote: > U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D- New York, said Tuesday a generic version > of > ciproflaxin, the antibiotic used to treat anthrax, should be made > available immediately for government use even though German drugmaker > BayerAG holds the patent for the drug. > > http://www.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/16/anthrax/ > http://money.cnn.com/2001/10/16/news/generic_cipro/ What else would anyone expect? The U.S. is a kleptocracy, a shakedown state. It operates by stealing money from citizen-units and then giving that money to welfare breeders and layabouts and corrupt contractors. Basket-case economies like Israel get $5000 million a year, with Egypt getting the same amount as a bribe. As for the grab of Bayer's property, what can Germany do about it? However, it looks like Bayer is getting the message from this threat to simply steal Cipro: they have committed to supplying enough Cipro to Our Federal Government to treat 10 million sheeple. (Why isn't this a matter for individuals to arrange for themselves, through some form of insurance? Because Hillary is getting her fondest wish: socialized medicine, via a State of Emergency.) --Tim May, Occupied America "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759.

1 0

Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you
by friendz＠openxxx.net 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

You have been invited to check out this adult site by one of your friends who visited us. click here , our URL is: http://www.openxxx.net/ enjoy, OpenXXX TEAM 2001

1 0

Internation Patent Law doesn't apply to USG?
by Meyer Wolfsheim 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D- New York, said Tuesday a generic version of ciproflaxin, the antibiotic used to treat anthrax, should be made available immediately for government use even though German drugmaker BayerAG holds the patent for the drug. http://www.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/16/anthrax/ http://money.cnn.com/2001/10/16/news/generic_cipro/ -- Hmmm. -MW-

1 0

Re: mirror volunteers needed
by Steve Mynott 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

proff(a)iq.org (Julian Assange) writes: > An ability to create mail-aliases, gpg, perl5, and a good sense of humour :) What and where is the source? -- 1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott steve(a)tightrope.demon.co.uk its ok the problem solved itself

1 0

Welcome to our Daily Newsletter!
by freeze＠teamfreeze.com 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Welcome cypherpunks(a)toad.com, to the Freeze.com Daily Free Offers, Daily Free Downloads, and Daily Freeze Picks Newsletter. Freeze.com partnered with the following companies to exclusively mail for their site's newsletter. 0nlineipos.com ourmoneyguide.com mutualfundcafe.com fturesacademy.net womenarefromvenus.com 800goodbuy.com infowebmaster.com 4writers.com discountcaraudios.com 2timeslucky.com astrologyonthenet.com discountcomputerz.com 2buybonds.net yourexpecting.com ourmedicaldictionary.com jewelryave.com sidelinesportssupply.com 1800playwell.com 4jewellers.com top100atheletes.com cartafone.com colorfastusa.com activesportsreps.com 100supersites.com 1outofthebox.com 3000webtools.com This is our verification that you'd still like to receive our newsletter. If you'd like to be removed from the list, which would permanently remove yourself from the above companies email list since we are their exclusive and permanent newsletter provider, please click on the remove link that follows. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The e-mail address you are signed up with is: cypherpunks(a)toad.com To unsubscribe please http://regman.freeze.com/mailing/remove.asp?email=cypherpunks@toad.com This email is not sent unsolicited. This is a Freeze Network mailing! You are receiving this email as a subscriber to a Freeze Network service. This message is sent to subscribers ONLY. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Re: Comments On Cathy Young's Defeatist Compromising
by Mike Alissi 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Commentary From Reason Magazine Dear Matt - I wanted to be sure you've seen Jacob Sullum's latest column at Reason Online: <http://www.reason.com/sullum/101601.html> It's copied below. Thanks, Mike October 16, 2001 Fear of Prying By Jacob Sullum I first downloaded Pretty Good Privacy a couple of years ago, at the request of an interview subject. He was nervous about discussing his drug use through unprotected e-mail, and my willingness to use PGP reassured him not only that he would be safe from eavesdroppers but that he could trust me to take his privacy concerns seriously. It was a small illustration of encryption's power, but it brought home to me what a godsend this kind of readily available, easily used software must be to dissidents who risk prison by sharing unauthorized information or expressing forbidden opinions. Phil Zimmermann had such people in mind when he created PGP a decade ago and risked prison by posting it online. At the time, the U.S. government considered strong encryption software a "munition," and by making it available to human rights activists around the world Zimmermann was arguably violating a federal ban on the export of such weapons. Some politicians are trying to revive this sinister view of encryption in the wake of last month's terrorist attacks. In a floor speech a week after hijacked airplanes collided with the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) worried aloud about "somebody out there using encryption technology for the purposes of pursuing a terrorist act in the United States." He declared, "There is no excuse for anybody to be underwriting that type of activity in our country." To prevent terrorists from shielding their communications, Gregg wants to make all producers of encryption systems design their products so the government can read the messages they generate. The surveillance would be "judicially controlled" to make sure it "simply gets at the bad guys." Gregg's opposition to strong encryption is echoed in some surprising quarters. Boston Globe columnist Cathy Young, a colleague of mine at Reason magazine, has confessed that "the idea of people being able to encrypt electronic communications so that they are beyond surveillance" has always seemed "scary" to her, "precisely because of the threat of terrorism." This is like saying that computers or telephones or airplanes or box cutters are scary. Any technology can be used for good or ill. The question is whether the potential for evil justifies restrictions on legitimate uses. As more than one critic has pointed out, the arguments against strong encryption could also be used against strong locks, since criminals tend to hatch their plans behind closed doors. That doesn't mean all of us should make extra sets of house keys for the police in case they need to search our homes. We have been down this road before with various proposals during the 1990s for "key recovery" arrangements through which the authorities could break otherwise unbreakable codes. Now as then, the most decisive argument against encryption controls is that they wouldn't work because PGP-like software is already available from a variety of sources. Does Sen. Gregg plan to come to my house and erase my copy of PGP? If not, how can he possibly hope to stop terrorists, who are much more highly motivated than I am to shield their communications, from obtaining and using such software? The attempt to do so would weaken security rather than enhancing it. A 1998 report from a panel of distinguished cryptographers and computer scientists concluded that "there are compelling reasons to believe that, given the state of the art in cryptology and secure systems engineering, government-access key recovery is not compatible with large scale, economical, secure cryptographic systems." A member of the panel, Matt Blaze, recently told The Washington Post, "I am extremely doubtful that this could be done without weakening computer systems, and the costs would be absolutely staggering." In addition to the bugs introduced by added complexity, keeping extra copies of the keys used to decode messages would create tempting targets for thieves. The keys could also be compromised by incompetent or corrupt officials charged with protecting them. Misuse of official records is not exactly unheard of in this country, and the problem would be magnified if every unsavory regime that has enlisted in the war on terrorism were to be trusted with the keys to its citizens' e-mail. For the dissidents Phil Zimmermann is rightly proud of helping, the whole point of encryption is to guard against official surveillance. If Gregg's vision were ever realized, they would once again have to watch what they say. ) Copyright 2001 by Creators Syndicate Inc. Jacob Sullum's weekly column is distributed by Creators Syndicate. If you'd like to see it in your local newspaper, write or call the editorial page editor. ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0

Re: Comments On Cathy Young's Defeatist Compromising
by Mike Alissi 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Commentary From Reason Magazine Dear Matt - I wanted to be sure you've seen Jacob Sullum's latest column at Reason Online: <http://www.reason.com/sullum/101601.html> It's copied below. Thanks, Mike October 16, 2001 Fear of Prying By Jacob Sullum I first downloaded Pretty Good Privacy a couple of years ago, at the request of an interview subject. He was nervous about discussing his drug use through unprotected e-mail, and my willingness to use PGP reassured him not only that he would be safe from eavesdroppers but that he could trust me to take his privacy concerns seriously. It was a small illustration of encryption's power, but it brought home to me what a godsend this kind of readily available, easily used software must be to dissidents who risk prison by sharing unauthorized information or expressing forbidden opinions. Phil Zimmermann had such people in mind when he created PGP a decade ago and risked prison by posting it online. At the time, the U.S. government considered strong encryption software a "munition," and by making it available to human rights activists around the world Zimmermann was arguably violating a federal ban on the export of such weapons. Some politicians are trying to revive this sinister view of encryption in the wake of last month's terrorist attacks. In a floor speech a week after hijacked airplanes collided with the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) worried aloud about "somebody out there using encryption technology for the purposes of pursuing a terrorist act in the United States." He declared, "There is no excuse for anybody to be underwriting that type of activity in our country." To prevent terrorists from shielding their communications, Gregg wants to make all producers of encryption systems design their products so the government can read the messages they generate. The surveillance would be "judicially controlled" to make sure it "simply gets at the bad guys." Gregg's opposition to strong encryption is echoed in some surprising quarters. Boston Globe columnist Cathy Young, a colleague of mine at Reason magazine, has confessed that "the idea of people being able to encrypt electronic communications so that they are beyond surveillance" has always seemed "scary" to her, "precisely because of the threat of terrorism." This is like saying that computers or telephones or airplanes or box cutters are scary. Any technology can be used for good or ill. The question is whether the potential for evil justifies restrictions on legitimate uses. As more than one critic has pointed out, the arguments against strong encryption could also be used against strong locks, since criminals tend to hatch their plans behind closed doors. That doesn't mean all of us should make extra sets of house keys for the police in case they need to search our homes. We have been down this road before with various proposals during the 1990s for "key recovery" arrangements through which the authorities could break otherwise unbreakable codes. Now as then, the most decisive argument against encryption controls is that they wouldn't work because PGP-like software is already available from a variety of sources. Does Sen. Gregg plan to come to my house and erase my copy of PGP? If not, how can he possibly hope to stop terrorists, who are much more highly motivated than I am to shield their communications, from obtaining and using such software? The attempt to do so would weaken security rather than enhancing it. A 1998 report from a panel of distinguished cryptographers and computer scientists concluded that "there are compelling reasons to believe that, given the state of the art in cryptology and secure systems engineering, government-access key recovery is not compatible with large scale, economical, secure cryptographic systems." A member of the panel, Matt Blaze, recently told The Washington Post, "I am extremely doubtful that this could be done without weakening computer systems, and the costs would be absolutely staggering." In addition to the bugs introduced by added complexity, keeping extra copies of the keys used to decode messages would create tempting targets for thieves. The keys could also be compromised by incompetent or corrupt officials charged with protecting them. Misuse of official records is not exactly unheard of in this country, and the problem would be magnified if every unsavory regime that has enlisted in the war on terrorism were to be trusted with the keys to its citizens' e-mail. For the dissidents Phil Zimmermann is rightly proud of helping, the whole point of encryption is to guard against official surveillance. If Gregg's vision were ever realized, they would once again have to watch what they say. ) Copyright 2001 by Creators Syndicate Inc. Jacob Sullum's weekly column is distributed by Creators Syndicate. If you'd like to see it in your local newspaper, write or call the editorial page editor. ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0

[cio.com] Let's Stop Wasting $78 Billion a Year
by Jim Choate 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

http://www.cio.com/archive/101501/wasting_content.html -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. Edmund Burke (1784) The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

How do I?
by Smartlink2＠aol.com 16 Oct '01

16 Oct '01

Hey, I had a question. If I were interested in learning more about hacking bank computers, would you know where I could get that information, or perhaps you would be able to help me. Anyways you can write back to me at this address. Thanks Shiva

1 0