- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

InfoRequest - wealth_topic.au
by InfoRequest＠wealth_topic.au 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Post fra midt-troms.net (InfoRequest(a)wealth_topic.au) pa* Wendsday, November 7, 2001 at 04:41:37 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: In addition to the information you selected, we thought you might be Interested in the latested FREE LEADS RESIDUAL INCOME OFFER. One of our Sponsors has a Unique Home Business Lead Generation System and is offering Uniquely Qualified Leads to support a Residual Income Opportunity. If interested in details, just respond here: For more info Click here mailto:clari277@yahoo.com?subject=MORE_INFO (Please include name, phone, and email, and the best time you can be reached.) Sincerely, Click here mailto:clari277@yahoo.com?subject=MORE_INFO P.S. On the given site you'll find a secret that every PRO in our industry knows and uses... It's called: S-L-L-G: Self Liquidating Lead Generation. It will Create a Huge, Electrifying Surge in Your Cash Flow. P.P.S. Find out the NEW 3 foot rule in MLM. "Why Old School MLM is nearly dead." E N J O Y O U R S U M M E R P R E L A U N C H 2 0 0 1 *********************************************************************************************** **If somehow your Form Submission is inaccurate; and you wish us to activate a filter to determine why you received this, then please email us here: Nomore_Leads(a)excite.com

1 0

RE: Enemy at the Door
by keyser-soze＠hushmail.com 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

At 10:19 AM 11/7/2001 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote: > Of course you could connect an automated firearm. (Crime Stoppers Note: > aways aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list > know what penalties might be brought. I seem to recall that tying a > shotgun to the door knob was ruled an "indescriminate weapon" But a > FaceCam controlled gun wouldn't be indescriminate. > > ks > Try explaining that to the widow of the fireman who was trying to save your house. ...of course, that's assuming that it works perfectly, with no false returns. Reality rarely matches marketing. The accuracy rates for face recognition are good iff and only iff the subject is cooperating. With your proposed system, if you forgot to take off your sunglasses when you went in the house, you're probably dead. Peter Trei -------------------------------- All professional alarm systems have an "armed state" and "triggered" warning so the property owners can shut it off before any action is taken. I'm sure something appropriate can be devised to handle false IDs. As for the firemen, this would indeed be a weakness. BTW, open source face recognition SW is available from Intel. http://www.intel.com/research/mrl/research/opencv/pr/visionSystemsDesignMag… Does anyone know of open source SW which could be adapted for target tracking and fire control? Imagine how feature-face recognition could be married with targeting and anaonymous open broadband wireless access (commuication is encrypted and only used when a possible target match has been identified) to identify, target, authorize and eliminate vermin. OpenJackal anyone? ks

1 0

Microsoft scripting and other "repulsive garbage", redirection
by Khoder bin Hakkin 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

http://wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,48177,00.html This is perhaps the most amusing part: "My computer has been totally taken over by disgusting porn ads," Martha Nichols, a secretary in Chicago, said. "A few months ago the browser began spontaneously opening up to a dozen windows displaying triple-X-rated ads every time I entered a website address that couldn't be found. I have five kids, and they were being exposed to this repulsive garbage. I finally had to switch to Netscape to stop the ads." Nichols said that she had never downloaded any programs from adult websites, or even visited such websites. "I don't want to sound like a prude, but I just don't do that sort of thing online. And the computer is in our living room, so I know the kids didn't do it either."

1 0

Re: [CNN] FBI: Threat against Western bridges 'not credible'
by Anonymous 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

>Form over function. Same as airport security. Psyops. Like the warnings >to keep people off balance. Should we start a pool to see who can guess >when ashcruft will put everyone 'on highest alert' next? It'll probably The airport security show is clearly designed to intimidate sheeple. >From what I saw, the security consists of asking for photo ID 3 times instead of once (used to be at the check-in counter, now also when entering security check and at the gate). Mind boggles trying to understand how these two extra checks help. Is there a single documented case of a terrorist *not* having a proper ID ? Or losing the ID *after* the check-in ? The carry-on bagage X-raying and personal inductive test still fail to detect non-metallic knives, perhaps hidden in the shoes. Restaurants at airports still offer metal knives. After the security check. There are *so* many armed people at airports and so much more guns that inside jobs become much simpler than before. No one is going to ID armed man in military fatigue. Cockpit doors have better locks now, but I wonder where do pilots urinate during long flights ?

1 0

URL for William Cooper death story
by Tim May 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Got the URL for the AP story on William Cooper's death in a midnight raid: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/breaking/1106deputyshot06-ON.html --Tim May "If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're around." --attribution uncertain, possibly Gunner, on Usenet

3 2

I thought I would tell you....
by S. Jensen 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

1 0

Enemy at the Door
by keyser-soze＠hushmail.com 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Seems those opposed to the coming civil liberties crack down need to start employing some of the very same technology proposed to corral us. For starters how about PC FaceCam to punish sneak and peek? Seems that if the data base of such a system were programmed to detect entry and discriminate family members or others who should have legit access to your property you could use it to deter their searches.(Probably a good idea to put a good UPS on the PC and FaceCam to thwart power interruptions, though why they would want to risk causing a tell tale time reset to one of you appliances I can't imagine.) For example, you could hook a compressed air tank to a high frequency whistle via a control valve connected to you PC. Shouldn't be much of a problem reaching damaging or even lethal sound levels and might hard to stop once triggered. (Ever try find which one of your smoke detectors was triggering?) Not recommended if you have pets :-) (I once connected a buzzer in the center of a large wall-mounted array of flash lamps to an under-the-carpet pressure sensor to form a burglar bugger. When triggered the system would sound the buzzer for about 1/2 second, to attract the eyes of the burglar, and then fire. A few months after install our place was burgled and the thieves fled without taking any items, probably with some permanent retinal damage.) Of course you could connect an automated firearm to the PC. (Crime Stoppers Note: always aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list know what penalties might be brought? I seem to recall that tying a shotgun to the doorknob was ruled an "indiscriminate weapon". But a FaceCam controlled gun wouldn't be indiscriminate.

1 0

I thought I would tell you....
by S. Jensen 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

1 0

Enemy at the Door
by keyser-soze＠hushmail.com 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Seems those opposed to the coming civil liberties crack down need to start employing some of the very same technology proposed to corral us. For starters how about PC FaceCam to punish sneek and peekers? Seems that if the data base of such a system were programmed to detect entry and descriminate family members or others who should have legit access to your property you could use it to deter their searches.(Probably a good idea to put a good UPS on the PC and FaceCam to thwart power interruptions, though why they would want to risk causing a tell tale time reset to one of you appliances I can't imaginge.) For example, you could hook a compressed air tank to a high frequency whistle via a control valve connected to you PC. Shouldn't be much of a problem reaching damaging or even lethal sound levels and might hard to stop once triggered. (Ever try find which one of your smoke detectors was triggering?) I once connected a buzzer in the center of a large wall-mounted array of flash lamps to an under-the-carpet pressure sensor to form a burgler bugger. When triggered the system would sound the buzzer for about 1/2 second, to attract the eyes of the burgler, and then fire. A few months after install our place was burgled and the thieves fled without taking any items, probably with some permanent retnal damage. Of course you could connect an automated firearm. (Crime Stoppers Note: aways aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list know what penalties might be brought. I seem to recall that tying a shotgun to the door knob was ruled an "indescriminate weapon" But a FaceCam controlled gun wouldn't be indescriminate. ks

1 0

Enemy at the Door
by keyser-soze＠hushmail.com 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Seems those opposed to the coming civil liberties crack down need to start employing some of the very same technology proposed to corral us. For starters how about PC FaceCam to punish sneek and peekers? Seems that if the data base of such a system were programmed to detect entry and descriminate family members or others who should have legit access to your property you could use it to deter their searches.(Probably a good idea to put a good UPS on the PC and FaceCam to thwart power interruptions, though why they would want to risk causing a tell tale time reset to one of you appliances I can't imaginge.) For example, you could hook a compressed air tank to a high frequency whistle via a control valve connected to you PC. Shouldn't be much of a problem reaching damaging or even lethal sound levels and might hard to stop once triggered. (Ever try find which one of your smoke detectors was triggering?) Not recommended if you have pets :-) (I once connected a buzzer in the center of a large wall-mounted array of flash lamps to an under-the-carpet pressure sensor to form a burgler bugger. When triggered the system would sound the buzzer for about 1/2 second, to attract the eyes of the burgler, and then fire. A few months after install our place was burgled and the thieves fled without taking any items, probably with some permanent retnal damage.) Of course you could connect an automated firearm to the PC. (Crime Stoppers Note: aways aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list know what penalties might be brought. I seem to recall that tying a shotgun to the door knob was ruled an "indescriminate weapon" But a FaceCam controlled gun wouldn't be indescriminate.

1 0