- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Gateway sells computing
by Major Variola (ret) 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32701-2002Dec9.html (This is what ProcessTree, etc. tried to do commercially, and SETI@home, distributed.net etc. do for fun. Gateway is selling its 14 Teraflops of floor-demo machines' performance.)

1 0

Son of ZKS?
by Steve Schear 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

Tarzan is a peer-to-peer anonymous IP network layer. Many P2P systems try to implement anonymity at the application layer, instead of at a lower-level network layer. A robust free infrastructure which can anonymize any Internet traffic would benefit a wide array of existing protocols and current p2p systems, since the anonymous connection could seamlessly replace the current connection. Main designs goals of Tarzan, ordered by priority: 7 Application independence: Tarzan should provide the abstraction of an IP tunnel and perform transparently to user applications. 7 Anonymity against malicious nodes: Tarzan should ensure that colluding nodes cannot link a participating host as the sender (or recipient) of any message. 7 Fault-tolerance and availability: Tarzan should resist an adversary's attempts to overload the system or to block system entry or exit points. Tarzan should minimize the damage any one adversary can cause by running a few compromised machines. 7 Performance: Tarzan should maximize the performance of tunnel transmission, subject to our anonymity requirements. 7 Anonymity against a global eavesdropper: An adversary observing the entire network should be unable to determine which Tarzan relay initiates a particular message. http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/tarzan/

1 0

Current status of CFS for linux?
by Igor Chudov 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

If you do not know what is CFS, do not bother... For years, I have been and still am a happy user of CFS. I have not paid any attention to its development. I am now concerned though whether it has become obsolete. I am creating nightly backups and backup the encrypted CFS tree. What I am concerned is, if my computer crashes, perhaps I will have difficulty restoring CFS data on other computers. I noticed that there is something called TCFS, which is derived from CFS. Is it binary compatible? That is, let's say my home computer dies and I have the backup CDRW. Can I take the encrypted tree to some computer running _TCFS_ and decode the tree? igor

1 0

US Airways Domestic E-Savers
by ESavers＠usairways.com 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

Dear E-Savers Subscriber, US Airways is pleased to present this weekend's Domestic E-Savers offers: ************************************************************ 1. This Weekend's Domestic E-Savers 2. Introducing E-Upgrades 3. Last-Minute Hotel Deals 4. Dividend Miles Offers 5. E-Savers Fare Requirements 6. Subscription Information ************************************************************ 1. THIS WEEKEND'S DOMESTIC E-SAVERS ************************************************************ We will not be offering Domestic E-Savers for travel during the weekends of Dec. 28 and Jan. 4 due to the upcoming holiday season. But you can still take advantage of other great travel deals at http://www.usairways.com/promotions Here are this week's E-Savers for travel departing Saturday, December 14 and returning Sunday, December 15; Monday, December 16; or Tuesday, December 17. For travel this weekend, make your reservations online at http://www.usairways.com/promotions/esavers/offers2.htm These special fares can also be purchased by calling 1-888-359-3728. Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation. ROUNDTRIP FROM: TO: FARE: ------------------------------------------------------------- Albany, NY Pittsburgh, PA $128 Allentown, PA Pittsburgh, PA $118 Atlanta, GA Philadelphia, PA $128 (*) Atlanta, GA Pittsburgh, PA $128 (*) Baltimore, MD Charlotte, NC $138 Baltimore, MD Phoenix, AZ $198 (C) Baltimore, MD Pittsburgh, PA $128 Baton Rouge, LA Charlotte, NC $128 (#10) Birmingham, AL Charlotte, NC $138 Boston, MA Atlanta, GA $138 (C) Boston, MA Greensboro, NC $148 (*) (#6) Boston, MA Syracuse, NY $118 (#4) Boston, MA Pittsburgh, PA $138 (*) Boston, MA Charlotte, NC $148 (*) Buffalo, NY Boston, MA $128 (#6) Buffalo, NY New York LaGuardia, NY $118 (*) (#2) Buffalo, NY Memphis, TN $138 (C) Burlington, VT Philadelphia, PA $128 Charleston, SC Washington National, DC $128 (*) (#17) Charleston, SC Philadelphia, PA $128 (#9) Charlotte, NC Atlanta, GA $108 Charlotte, NC Boston, MA $148 (*) Charlotte, NC Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX $158 (*) Charlotte, NC Huntsville/Decatur, AL $128 (#10) Charlotte, NC Cincinnati, OH $138 (#17) Charlotte, NC Columbus, OH $138 (*) Charlotte, NC Indianapolis, IN $138 (*) Charlotte, NC Chicago O'Hare, IL $148 Charlotte, NC Jackson, MS $128 (#10) Charlotte, NC Syracuse, NY $138 (*) Charlotte, NC St. Louis, MO $148 Charlotte, NC Philadelphia, PA $148 Chicago O'Hare, IL Baltimore, MD $138 (C) Chicago O'Hare, IL Philadelphia, PA $148 (*) Chicago O'Hare, IL Pittsburgh, PA $138 Cincinnati, OH Philadelphia, PA $128 (#7) Cleveland, OH Charlotte, NC $138 Columbia, SC Boston, MA $148 (C) Columbus, OH Charlotte, NC $138 (*) Columbus, OH Philadelphia, PA $128 Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Charlotte, NC $158 (*) Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Philadelphia, PA $168 Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Pittsburgh, PA $158 Denver, CO Raleigh/Durham, NC $188 (*) (C) Detroit, MI Charlotte, NC $158 Detroit, MI Washington National, DC $148 (C) Detroit, MI Philadelphia, PA $138 Ft. Lauderdale, FL Raleigh/Durham, NC $138 (C) Greensboro, NC Boston, MA $148 (*) (#6) Greensboro, NC Newark, NJ $148 (C) Greensboro, NC Philadelphia, PA $138 (*) Greenville/Spart., SC Philadelphia, PA $148 (#8) Greenville/Spart., SC Pittsburgh, PA $138 (#14) Harrisburg, PA Boston, MA $128 (#1) Hartford, CT Buffalo, NY $118 (#1) Hartford, CT Denver, CO $208 (C) Houston, TX Charlotte, NC $158 Houston, TX Pittsburgh, PA $158 (*) Indianapolis, IN Charlotte, NC $138 (*) Indianapolis, IN New York LaGuardia, NY $128 (#6) Indianapolis, IN Philadelphia, PA $138 Kansas City, MO Charlotte, NC $148 Lansing, MI Pittsburgh, PA $118 (#5) Manchester, NH Charlotte, NC $138 Manchester, NH Philadelphia, PA $138 Manchester, NH Washington National, DC $128 (*) (#18) Manchester, NH New York LaGuardia, NY $118 (#4) Miami, FL Baltimore, MD $148 (C) Miami, FL Philadelphia, PA $148 Miami, FL Charlotte, NC $148 Milwaukee, WI Boston, MA $148 (C) Milwaukee, WI Pittsburgh, PA $128 Milwaukee, WI Charlotte, NC $148 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Philadelphia, PA $158 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Raleigh/Durham, NC $148 (C) Nashville, TN Boston, MA $148 (C) Nashville, TN Philadelphia, PA $138 (*) New York LaGuardia, NY Boston, MA $128 New York LaGuardia, NY Greensboro, NC $148 (#6) New York LaGuardia, NY Baltimore, MD $118 (#1) New York LaGuardia, NY Buffalo, NY $118 (*) (#2) New York LaGuardia, NY Houston, TX $158 (C) New York LaGuardia, NY Pittsburgh, PA $128 (*) New York LaGuardia, NY Richmond, VA $108 (#2) New York LaGuardia, NY Norfolk, VA $118 (#3) Newark, NJ Chicago O'Hare, IL $138 (C) Newark, NJ Pittsburgh, PA $138 Norfolk, VA Philadelphia, PA $128 Orlando, FL Boston, MA $148 (C) Orlando, FL Pittsburgh, PA $158 Philadelphia, PA Atlanta, GA $128 (*) Philadelphia, PA Houston, TX $158 Philadelphia, PA Greensboro, NC $138 (*) Philadelphia, PA Tampa/St. Petersburg, FL $158 (*) Philadelphia, PA Louisville, KY $128 (#13) Philadelphia, PA Rochester, NY $118 Philadelphia, PA Chicago O'Hare, IL $148 (*) Philadelphia, PA Kansas City, MO $138 Philadelphia, PA Nashville, TN $138 (*) Philadelphia, PA Denver, CO $188 Philadelphia, PA Boston, MA $118 Phoenix, AZ Newark, NJ $198 (C) Pittsburgh, PA Atlanta, GA $128 (*) Pittsburgh, PA Boston, MA $138 (*) Pittsburgh, PA Cincinnati, OH $108 (#18) Pittsburgh, PA Denver, CO $208 Pittsburgh, PA Houston, TX $158 (*) Pittsburgh, PA Kansas City, MO $128 Pittsburgh, PA San Francisco, CA $218 (*) Pittsburgh, PA Norfolk, VA $128 Pittsburgh, PA New York LaGuardia, NY $128 (*) Pittsburgh, PA Greensboro, NC $138 (#12) Pittsburgh, PA Washington National, DC $138 Providence, RI Charlotte, NC $148 Providence, RI Pittsburgh, PA $138 Providence, RI Philadelphia, PA $118 Raleigh/Durham, NC Denver, CO $188 (*) (C) Raleigh/Durham, NC New York LaGuardia, NY $148 (#6) Richmond, VA Pittsburgh, PA $138 (#15) Rochester, NY Atlanta, GA $148 (C) Rochester, NY Charlotte, NC $138 Rochester, NY Washington National, DC $128 (#1) San Francisco, CA Baltimore, MD $218 (C) San Francisco, CA Pittsburgh, PA $218 (*) San Francisco, CA Philadelphia, PA $218 St. Louis, MO Charleston, SC $138 (C) Syracuse, NY Charlotte, NC $138 (*) Syracuse, NY New York LaGuardia, NY $118 (#4) Tampa/St. Petersburg, FL Charlotte, NC $138 Tampa/St. Petersburg, FL Chicago O'Hare, IL $158 (C) Tampa/St. Petersburg, FL Philadelphia, PA $158 (*) Washington Dulles, DC Kansas City, MO $148 (C) Washington National, DC Buffalo, NY $128 (#1) Washington National, DC Charleston, SC $128 (*) (#17) Washington National, DC Columbus, OH $138 (#11) Washington National, DC New York LaGuardia, NY $128 Washington National, DC Manchester, NH $128 (*) (#18) Washington National, DC Knoxville, TN $118 (#13) West Palm Beach, FL Washington National, DC $158 White Plains, NY Washington National, DC $118 (#16) White Plains, NY Pittsburgh, PA $118 (#11) Wilmington, NC Newark, NJ $138 (C) Roundtrip purchase required. (*) Indicates available for travel originating in either city (C) Indicates travel requires a connecting flight (#) Indicates travel is wholly on US Airways Express, served by the following carriers: 1. Allegheny 2. Allegheny/Chautauqua 3. Allegheny/Chautauqua/Colgan/Piedmont 4. Allegheny/Colgan 5. Allegheny/Shuttle America 6. Chautauqua 7. Chautauqua/Mesa 8. Chautauqua/Mesa/PSA 9. Chautauqua/PSA 10. Mesa 11. Mesa/Piedmont 12. Mesa/Piedmont/Trans States 13. Mesa/PSA 14. Mesa/PSA/Trans States 15. Mesa/Trans States 16. Piedmont 17. Piedmont/PSA 18. PSA Fares shown are based on roundtrip Coach travel on US Airways/US Airways Express, during the period specified above. Depending upon your travel needs, alternative routings may be available at the same fares, with part of the service on regional aircraft operated by US Airways Express carriers Allegheny, Air Midwest, Chautauqua, Colgan, Mesa, Piedmont, PSA, Shuttle America or Trans States. ************************************************************ 2. INTRODUCING E-UPGRADES ************************************************************ No more paper or waiting -- E-Upgrades make it easy for Dividend Miles members to upgrade on their next US Airways flight. E-Upgrades can be purchased for $50 each ($40 for Preferred members), and a minimum of one 500-mile E-Upgrade is debited per flight segment. You can even check in for your flight at any Self-Service Check-In kiosks when using an E-Upgrade. For more information, visit http://www.usairways.com/dm/eupgrades ************************************************************ 3. LAST-MINUTE HOTEL DEALS ************************************************************ US Airways has teamed up with hotels.com to offer E-Savers subscribers great discounts at hotels in this weekend's E-Savers destinations. Simply visit http://www.8002hotels.com/usairways/index.html and click on the E-Savers destination you're planning to visit. hotels.com will list a variety of hotels offering a wide range of rates for you to choose from. Book your room online or call hotels.com directly at 1-800-645-6144. Here's a sample of this week's special rates from hotels.com: Atlanta from $45 Baltimore from $59 Charlotte from $45 New York from $85 Tampa from $59 Washington DC from $55 ************************************************************ 4. DIVIDEND MILES OFFERS ************************************************************ Did you know you could earn thousands of Dividend Miles when you buy, sell, and/or finance your home or obtain an auto loan through LendingTree? It's one of the most generous mileage offers around. Visit http://www.lendingtree.com/usairways/default.asp?source=esavers for complete details. Already a Dividend Miles member? You can earn triple miles on every US Airways Shuttle flight you fly through December 31, 2002. Plus, your bonus miles will count towards earning Preferred status. Register before you take your next US Airways Shuttle flight at http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/5236.htm Reminder: Make sure your Dividend Miles account number is in your E-Savers reservation, so you can earn miles for worldwide award travel on US Airways and our partners. To enroll in Dividend Miles, go to http://www.usairways.com/ To earn even more miles, book E-Savers using your US Airways Dividend Miles Visa card. To apply for the Dividend Miles Visa card issued by Bank of America, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/dmcreditcards Please note: Mileage bonus for booking online does not apply to E-Savers. ************************************************************ 5. E-SAVERS FARE REQUIREMENTS ************************************************************ - Restrictions: Seats are limited and are not available on all flights/days. Fares cannot be combined with other fares, discounts, promotions or coupons. Travel must begin and end in the same city. One-way travel, stopovers, waitlisting and standbys are not permitted. Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation. Fares will not be honored retroactively or in conjunction with the exchange of any partially used ticket. - Travel: Depart Saturday, 12/14/02, and return Sunday, Monday or Tuesday, 12/15-12/17/02. - Taxes/Fees: Fares do not include a $3 federal excise tax which will be imposed on each flight segment of your itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and a landing. Fares for Canada do not include total government-imposed taxes and fees of up to $70. Depending on the itinerary, passenger facility charges of up to $18 and the September 11th Security Fee of up to $10 may apply in addition to the fare. - Changes: Tickets become non-refundable 24 hours after making initial reservation, and may be changed prior to the departure of each flight segment for a minimum $100 fee. If changes are not made prior to the departure date/time of each flight, the entire remaining ticket will have no further value. - Miscellaneous: Lower fares may be available in these markets. Other conditions apply. ************************************************************ 6. SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION ************************************************************ This is a post-only mailing sent to CYPHERPUNKS(a)ALGEBRA.COM. If you would like to change your e-mail address, you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe at the E-Savers Enrollment page: http://www.usairways.com/promotions/esavers/enroll/index.htm To unsubscribe from this list, please click here: http://www.usairways.com/cgi-bin/delete.cgi?email=CYPHERPUNKS@ALGEBRA.COM To change your departure city preferences, please visit: http://www.usairways.com/promotions/esavers/enroll/index.htm Please do not respond to this message. Copyright US Airways 1996-2002. All rights reserved.

1 0

Re: 60 years to rights restoration
by lcs Mixmaster Remailer 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

This is the best explanation of the behavior of the Democratic Party I've ever seen. On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:01:37 -0500, you wrote: > > 1. Put a bunch of gorillas in a cage. > > 2. Put a nice stack of boxes in the cage. > > 3. Then, string a big bunch of bananas from the top of the cage > hanging within arm's reach from the top of the stack of boxes. > > (3a. Okay, put the gorillas in last, or you'll never get to steps 1 > and 2 :-).) > > > 4. When the first gorilla climbs to the top of the boxes to grab the > bananas, do something extremely unpleasant to all the gorillas, like, > say, deluging them with icy water from sprinklers at the top of the > cage, or something. > > Pretty soon, they stop climbing the boxes completely. > > 5. Then, replace the one gorilla. Watch the others physically > restrain him if he tries to go for the bananas. > > Repeat 5 until all the gorillas have been replaced. > > 6. The gorillas will physically assault anyone who climbs the > pyramid, and they won't know why. > > :-).

1 0

60 years to rights restoration
by Major Variola (ret) 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

> that the War on Terrorism should > be won in about 60 years, at which point the American citizens would > see > their civil liberties returned. Obviously, only traitors, agitators, > and > other enemy combatants would make the outrageous claim that this war > will likely last perpetually. None have yet commented that in 60 years, there will be no one left that remembers what things were like. If they do, maybe congress will quietly apologize to them and grant some hush money to the few survivors, following the Jap Internment Apology plan. --- Better put some ice on that, NYC

2 1

Hooray for TIA
by Nomen Nescio 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

[I'm not happy with the tone of this, but I'm forwarding it as privacy politics is pretty clearly on topic... --Perry] For years we cypherpunks have been telling you people that you are responsible for protecting your own privacy. Use cash for purchases, look into offshore accounts, protect your online privacy with cryptography and anonymizing proxies. But did you listen? No. You thought to trust the government. You believed in transparency. You passed laws, for Freedom of Information, and Protection of Privacy, and Insurance Accountability, and Fair Lending Practices. And now the government has turned against you. It's Total Information Awareness program is being set up to collect data from every database possible. Medical records, financial data, favorite web sites and email addresses, all will be brought together into a centralized office where every detail can be studied in order to build a profile about you. All those laws you passed, those government regulations, are being bypassed, ignored, flushed away, all in the name of National Security. Well, we fucking told you so. And don't try blaming the people in charge. You liberals are cursing Bush, and Ashcroft, and Poindexter. These laws were passed by the entire U.S. Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike. Representatives have the full support of the American people; most were re-elected with large margins. It's not Bush and company who are at fault, it's the whole idea that you can trust government to protect your privacy. All that data out there has been begging to be used. It was only a matter of time. And you know what? It's good that this has happened. Not only has it shown the intellectual bankruptcy of trust-the-government privacy advocates, it proves what cypherpunks have been saying all along, that people must protect their own privacy. The only way to keep your privacy safe is to keep the data from getting out there in the first place. Cypherpunks have consistently promoted two seemingly contradictory ideas. The first is that people should protect data about themselves. The second is that they should have full access and usability for data they acquire about others. Cypherpunks have supported ideas like Blacknet, and offshore data havens, places where data could be collected, consolidated and sold irrespective of government regulations. The same encryption technologies which help people protect their privacy can be used to bypass attempts by government to control the flow of data. This two-pronged approach to the problem produces a sort of Darwinian competition between privacy protectors and data collectors. It's not unlike the competition between code makers and code breakers, which has led to amazing enhancements in cryptography technology over the past few decades. There is every reason to expect that a similar level of improvement and innovation can and will eventually develop in privacy protection and data management as these technologies continue to be deployed. But in the mean time, three cheers for TIA. It's too bad that it's the government doing it rather than a shadowy offshore agency with virtual tentacles into the net, but the point is being made all the same. Now more than ever, people need privacy technology. Government is not the answer. It's time to start protecting ourselves, because nobody else is going to do it for us. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

Re: Digital Bearer Settlements Wiki
by R. A. Hettinga 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

At 10:32 PM -0500 on 12/9/02, Myers W. Carpenter wrote: > Apparently we still haven't. <g> I was waiting to beef up the site with more > interesting bits and pieces, but you lot are welcome to have a look around. > > The link is: > > http://cryptomonkey.net/dbs/ > > And yes, I run the site. *That* is extremely cool. Thank you. Very much. We definitely need to crank up a full antecedents/precedents list of people who came before me on the internet bearer transaction idea though, including, but not limited to Nick Szabo, who you have, but also folks like the Agorics guys, Eric Hughes, Tim May, and so on. We can also link to the paper that David Wyatt of CREST did about internet bearer securities transactions, Richard Rahn's testimony before Congress on them, and so on. Not to mention all the stuff the E-language people did, including Ferex :-). Cheers, RAH -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

Re: [2600.com] Update On The Mike Maginnis Story
by Tyler Durden 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

eJazeera, Baby! That guy should have had a tiny laptop or something that could wisk those images off the moment an 802.l1 port was detected. (Actually, it should wisk off a copy of the photos EVERY time an 802.11 port is detected!) In addition, wouldn't it be great if he had actually had a digital camera that had the capability to auto-upload the images when sensing a WiFi link? (And since I'm wishing, perhaps it could take photographs automatically when handled...) This could result in the ironic possibility that the authorities themselves might (inadvertantly) cause the uploads, perhaps even with photos of their faces staring into the (live) camera they are examining. >From: Myers Carpenter <myers(a)maski.org> >To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lne.com> >Subject: [2600.com] Update On The Mike Maginnis Story >Date: 10 Dec 2002 11:35:30 -0500 > >[ the radio interview with this guy can be found here: > http://www.2600.com/offthehook/rafiles/2002/120402.mp3 ] > >http://www.2600.com/news/display/display.shtml?id=1455 > >UPDATE ON THE MIKE MAGINNIS STORY >Posted 10 Dec 2002 08:15:20 UTC > >2600 has received a tremendous amount of correspondence regarding the >December 4th edition of "Off The Hook," and the news article that >followed, in which Mike Maginnis told his story of harassment by the >Secret Service. > >Although many readers find Maginnis's story highly believable, others >have criticized the article due to a lack of corroborating evidence. It >is true that Maginnis was given no paperwork in relation to his ordeal, >and so far no one has come forward as a witness to Maginnis's arrest >across from the Adams Mark Hotel in Denver. > >Quite a number of people have written in with similar stories of >harassment for taking pictures of everything from trains to motorcades >to public buildings. Others have expressed a degree of skepticism, some >even accusing us of all kinds of things from being anti-American to >engaging in shoddy journalism. As much as we disagree and find offense >in such statements, we actually understand much of the feeling behind >such anger. We believe this outrage is a not-so-distant relative of the >outrage that we feel when we report on stories like the Maginnis case. >In this instance, those who chose not to believe the story aimed their >anger at us for saying something they found offensive. And that's >something we can agree with - it WAS offensive. The difference is that >we also believe it was real. > >We think it's right to be skeptical when reading any news account and >that we should be treated no differently. We'd like to think that every >story reported on in the mainstream media is questioned thoroughly, >although we all know this is rarely the case. In the end, whether it's >2600 or Time, the decision on whether there is truth in a report lies >with the reader. > >This story has been frustrating for us because - like those who have >sent us mail - we want there to be a smoking gun, some way of proving >beyond any reasonable doubt that the events told to us by Mike Maginnis >were completely accurate. As is often the case in a story of injustice, >particularly when that injustice involves law enforcement, we're often >left with a solitary voice calling attention to it. When that happens, >we're faced with a difficult decision - do we not devote any attention >at all to what happened because there wasn't a crowd of witnesses? Or do >we give the person an opportunity to be heard and base our conclusions >on what they say and how they respond to questions, along with some >rudimentary fact checking? In this instance, we chose the latter and we >have no regrets at all for doing so. We believe the story is accurate >for a number of reasons. > > * First off, very little can be gained from making such accusations >against law enforcement in the town where you live. It's almost >literally like painting a big target on your back. And we all know what >happens when you piss off the Secret Service. It's unlikely someone >would put themselves in this position unless they were either completely >insane or telling the truth. At the very least, Maginnis stands to be >ridiculed for claiming to be detained by police when they deny ever >having had him in custody. > > * We were unable to find any holes or inconsistencies in the story >as Maginnis told it when interviewed on our radio program. Not one >person who has written in has been able to either. In his firsthand >account of his experience, Maginnis comes across as highly credible. We >encourage all readers to listen to the December 4th edition of "Off The >Hook," and make a personal judgment as to his credibility. Maginnis was >also completely up front about previously getting into trouble for >trespassing. That admission alone could risk his being labeled as a >troublemaker who deserved what he got. But if he wasn't telling the >truth about what happened last week, why make that admission in the >first place? > > * Maginnis has intentionally not spoken to other news media. If he >was seriously pursuing any type of political or social cause, speaking >to the major media would have been the next logical step after 2600. >There are a number of news organizations attempting to contact Maginnis >through us but he has requested that his privacy not be invaded any >further. > > * Most importantly, it's a very believable scenario. As mentioned >above, we've gotten reports of all sorts of similar encounters. They >include a man being threatened with arrest by a Secret Service agent in >front of the same hotel for overtly attempting to photograph the agent. >We've been aware of other such occurrences well before this story broke. >Those who believe such an event cannot happen in our country have simply >not been paying attention to what's been going on. It seems a foregone >conclusion that the United States is heading in a direction of increased >civil rights abuses. The case of Jose Padilla illustrates just how easy >it is to bypass due process these days. > >Now let's turn the tables and examine the other side. We contacted both >the Denver Police and the Secret Service to find out if the story was >true. They both took our information and neither of them ever got back >to us. Their silence has been deafening and it's perhaps the most >significant statement they could have made. > >We realize that there will still be people who remain unconvinced. And >so we hereby invite them to help us get to the bottom of this by proving >us wrong: The Vice President is always staying somewhere and one day >he's certain to stay somewhere near you. When that happens, simply go >down to the hotel he's staying at and take as many pictures as you can. >Be sure to photograph the snipers and the military guard as well. When >we receive pictures proving that we do indeed have the right to take >photos of public places while standing in a public place, we will be >more than happy to make that known. We will also welcome and make public >any correspondence from appropriate law enforcement agencies who wish to >say for the record that such freedoms will not be challenged in the >future. > >As it's now gotten to the point where Mike Maginnis is being harassed at >his home and even his parents are getting calls from reporters, he is >now rightfully asking to just be left alone. It took a great deal of >courage to speak out in the first place and we hope that the nightmare >he's lived through has come to an end. For the rest of us, keeping our >eyes open has never been so important. > >As always, we welcome your critiques and input. You can send mail to the >radio show at oth(a)2600.com or to our website at webmaster(a)2600.com. All >tips will be treated as confidential. _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

1 0

Re: The trend toward "signing away rights"
by Tim May 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:03 AM, Trei, Peter wrote: > Reality precedes fiction. Around Boston I sometimes see > cars with an odd little sticker in the back window, white, round, > with a stylized blue car in the top half (it can also be read as > the face of someone wearing a fedora, peering out from under the > brim). > > If you put one of these stickers on your car, you are giving the > police permission to pull the car over without probable cause if > they find it on the road late at night (1am-5am, or something like > that), just to check that all is in order. > > I think it's being promoted as an anti-theft tool. This figures, that Boston is involved, as "The Practice" is set in Boston. The writers try to use local news to shape the stories they tell, as with the "ripped from the headlines" themes of other programs. And this really does raise some interesting issues which need exploration, here as well as on t.v. For example, to a kind of pure libertarian, signing away rights is permissible. Employees at corporations do it every day, and always have. Many libertarians would even support selling oneself into slavery (perhaps to pay for some operation or to provide for one's children.) And indentured servitude is easy to support. Signing away rights is also common in certain residential communities, where the local rules ("CC&Rs") may restrict all sort of activities. However, when it is government one signs rights away to, and when there are issues of what happens to those who DON'T have the "Mr. Policeman is Your Friend!" sticker on their cars, the issues are no longer about voluntarism. Vernor Vinge could probably write some good stories around these themes. --Tim May

1 0