- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Any more like www.anonymizer.com ??
by ! Drive 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:58 PM 2/18/97 -0500, Jeremiah A Blatz might have said: >edgarswank(a)juno.com (Edgar W Swank) writes: >> Does anyone have a list of web proxies for anonymous surfing? >> >> I already know about www.anonymizer.com, and there was a >> "canadianizer" that would alter text to make it more "Canadian", >> but that is now apparently defunct. > >There's a Zippifier (inserts Zippy the Pinhead quotes) at: >http://www.metahtml.com/apps/zippy/welcome.mhtml > A proposal and prototype of a different anonymity mechanism can be found at: http://www.itd.nrl.navy.mil/ITD/5540/projects/onion-routing/overview.html

1 0

Re: Any more like www.anonymizer.com ??
by ! Drive 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:58 PM 2/18/97 -0500, Jeremiah A Blatz might have said: >edgarswank(a)juno.com (Edgar W Swank) writes: >> Does anyone have a list of web proxies for anonymous surfing? >> >> I already know about www.anonymizer.com, and there was a >> "canadianizer" that would alter text to make it more "Canadian", >> but that is now apparently defunct. > >There's a Zippifier (inserts Zippy the Pinhead quotes) at: >http://www.metahtml.com/apps/zippy/welcome.mhtml > A proposal and prototype of a different anonymity mechanism can be found at: http://www.itd.nrl.navy.mil/ITD/5540/projects/onion-routing/overview.html

1 0

ISP access fee rebuttal
by Steve Schear 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

If you are interested in the on-going debate over ISP access charges, I sugest you look at a newly published report perpared for the Internet Access Coalition. It stomps on the RBOC assertions that dial-in access to the Net is having a generally negative impact on their telephone networks from both performance and financial asapects. http://www2.itic.org/itic/eti_toc.html --Steve

1 0

Re: Stop sending me your shit
by Sean Roach 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 02:04 PM 2/18/97 -0500, Alec wrote: >At 08:38 PM 2/18/97 +0200, you wrote: >: >:Get me off your list or else ..... . Get me out your fuckin list assholes. > >Certainly you learned on your mother's knee that you can get more of what >you want from other people with kindness rather than anger and rudeness. >What did she say about using foul words? Lets think about these things. > >You may be in for a long stay here. These folks can be downright nasty >sometimes. > ... Personally, I just responded to one persons statement, (the one with the modicum of courtesy) and decided to let this looser languish, (because of his foul additude). I think that by this, maybe, he'll learn not to bite the hand of the persons who he is asking for help from. It also gives me a none too innocent feeling of graditude to know that this person will suffer a little longer, all because I decided that I didn't like him.

1 0

[noise] Re: JSC Security Report
by Sean Roach 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 03:29 PM 2/18/97 -0500, John Young wrote: >"Redefining Security," a 1994 report to the DoD and the CIA by >The Joint Security Commission, offers bountiful information >on US security strategies, policies, agencies, methodologies, >and techniques, you name it, with designs for the future. > > http://jya.com/jcs.htm (454K) > >If you ever wanted to talk like the spooks, parrot this dictionary >of NatSec ebonics. Great, I'll look into it. I've been meaning to get some info on the like. You just can't convince someone that you are one of them unless you talk like them. And I would like to get all relevant information to any investigations into my activities faxed to the nearest Kinko's.

1 0

Re: Anyone have the complete info on CP list alternatives?
by Sean Roach 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 07:58 PM 2/17/97 -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: ... >It is a very good objections. I would like readers to speak up and say >their word for or against forwarding the list messages to >alt.cypherpunks. If a significant number of people objects (2-3 is >enough) I will disable this feature. As to my two cents, I like the idea, but would ask that the usenet feed have the scrambled address described by Cynthia H. Brown. I don't really care to have a box full of "YOU may HAVE JUST WON ONE MILLION DOLLARS!", if the system described by Mrs. Brown works, I would prefer this.

1 0

Re: Removal from newsgroup listing
by Z.B. 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Mon, 17 Feb 1997, Terry L. Davis wrote: > I'm not certain how I got on the cypherpunks newlist, but it's way over > my head. Please removed terryld(a)earthlink.com from cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Thanks > Another thing the new list needs...verification of subscribe requests. Zach Babayco zachb(a)netcom.com <-------finger for PGP public key If you need to know how to set up a mail filter or defend against emailbombs, send me a message with the words "get helpfile" (without the " marks) in the SUBJECT: header, *NOT THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE!* I have several useful FAQs and documents available.

1 0

[noise] Re: JSC Security Report
by Sean Roach 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 03:29 PM 2/18/97 -0500, John Young wrote: >"Redefining Security," a 1994 report to the DoD and the CIA by >The Joint Security Commission, offers bountiful information >on US security strategies, policies, agencies, methodologies, >and techniques, you name it, with designs for the future. > > http://jya.com/jcs.htm (454K) > >If you ever wanted to talk like the spooks, parrot this dictionary >of NatSec ebonics. Great, I'll look into it. I've been meaning to get some info on the like. You just can't convince someone that you are one of them unless you talk like them. And I would like to get all relevant information to any investigations into my activities faxed to the nearest Kinko's.

1 0

Re: Constitution and a Right to Privacy
by Timothy C. May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 2:51 PM -0500 2/18/97, Vin McLellan wrote: > Marshall Clow wrote: > >>Let's not start this.... <snip> > >>If we are going to discuss privacy, that's fine. >>It we are going to discuss abortion, there are better fora. > > Right, Marshall. I was attempting to respond directly to Tim's >comment, but I too have no desire to let the end of C'punks be yet another >sinkhole Abortion Debate. Foil at guard. I'll subside and let any riptide >response roll over me;-). Then why did you begin an abortion debate? I made no claims one way or another about abortion, but cited the issue as the main place the "right to privacy" issue has come to the fore. And I said I found the argument uncompelling. I did not say I was against abortion, for abortion, or, for that matter, for or against infanticide. > (Jeeze! Anyone else feel like these are the Final Days, like when a >company goes bankrupt, or graduation day or the like?? I hope one of these >C'punkish alternatives will provide an opportunity for some of the same >thoughtful and stimulating engagements that toad.com hosted.) Unsurprisingly, I've gotten some of the messages from folks I often get when people dislike some post I've made. They go like this: "Tim, I really like some of your posts. But, Jeez, give it a rest on foobar! Can't you go back to writing about lahdidah?" In other words, the reader wishes I would write only about what he or she is interested in. Well, pay me my consulting rate and I'll do just that. I've written many thousands of articles over the past 4.5 years...some of them very long articles, some very short, most of medium length. (I despise one-line repartee, and I'm glad our list has never fallen into this mode as so many other lists have.) I write about what I find interesting. You all know where the Delete key is. (Of course, a fairly large fraction of my recent posts have been deleted for you by Sandy, who sends many of my posts to neither the Main list nor the Flames list. Bet a lot of you didn't know this, did you?) --Tim May > Respect to all, pro-choice and pro-life, > > _Vin Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside" We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

1 0

ISP access fee rebuttal
by azur＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

If you are interested in the on-going debate over ISP access charges, I sugest you look at a newly published report perpared for the Internet Access Coalition. It stomps on the RBOC assertions that dial-in access to the Net is having a generally negative impact on their telephone networks from both performance and financial asapects. http://www2.itic.org/itic/eti_toc.html --Steve

1 0