- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

pgpcrack v0.99b
by Mark M. 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I've finally gotten around to adding secret key cracking support to pgpcrack. There also have been a few minor code changes to speed things up a bit. The source and cooresponding signature are located at http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/pgpcrack.html. Bug reports and suggestions are, as always, welcome. - -- Mark PGP encrypted mail prefered. Key fingerprint = d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348 http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBMiJ0WCzIPc7jvyFpAQGaKAgAg5x5U26uy1JJYv2lVKSHItFYOuTVa+qL EBL39NsscrZCuPSYmmm75AgjBJFR4giQ9mDA4QYvxg7Es1O7guX9oq5NHGowLGHH uJblF2pA6T+faQto3oJ0sVLJ4EyekRW0tZWz+TjIUO/c9ijWnciXJuIZ8YAJJRHO 2la92IFiy9d6hab2p7lvQn6MOB0mHjioS1iWvOTaqHpkpjRQm5GSbWA7Hx913LeE sAZM4FkI+KyujaatbuDjpemZ9R04BOmE4aDHuDY3TYAThWUz9sFpQuB8a0fe6Gwi GupMq1dsovbmtO7AOKeoo7l4va/0l6Pmji5/5cInKHftNbE+1sHaTg== =nxzL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: libelous action
by C Matthew Curtin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "JOHN" == JOHN E HOLT <76473.1732(a)CompuServe.COM> writes: JOHN> Dear Mr. Curtin JOHN> Your statements about myself and my product, The JOHN> POUCH are defamatory. Since they have been made in writing and JOHN> shown to and seen by other parties on the Internet, they JOHN> constitute libel. Please admit to all parties that you have no JOHN> personal knowledge of my product capabilities or my personal JOHN> character or reputation. Failure to do so at once will result JOHN> in legal action against you personally and Megasoft. As my signature said, I speak only for myself. I am not a representative of Megasoft in any official capacity. That which I have posted does not represent the views of Megasoft, its employees, its shareholders, its customers, its business partners, its landlord, its employees' mothers, and is in no way representative of any person living or dead, other than myself. I have no knowledge of JOHN E HOLT <76473.1732(a)CompuServe.COM>. The only knowledge I have of THE POUCH is its web site, found at http://www.flagler.com/security.html On 18 August 1996, I posted to the Cypherpunks mailing list, a note regarding THE POUCH, which included this paragraph: If it is any good, there's no way for us to know. But your marketing of the product has every indication that it's nothing more than smoke and mirrors. To coin a phrase, "pseudocrypto." I, speaking only on behalf of myself, stand by this statement. I do not apologize for my comments. If you, Mr. Holt, feel that this is a personal attack against you, I regret that you've misunderstood the tone and nature of my post. My statement is hardly libelous; I simply observed that if your product is truly secure, there is no means by which security experts can verify such claims. Study of computer security has shown that obscurity (using unpublished algorithms, for example) is not "security." By perpetuating confusion between the two terms, nonexpert users of crypographic software are hard pressed to make good decisions about what they use, and the risks of the software they're using. Hiding the internals of such software, claiming that it is "highly resistant to all known forms of cryptographic attack," is, in my opinion, irresponsible marketing. It is my hope that future marketing endeavors of THE POUCH will be more open and straightforward in its approach to security, providing evidence of a crystal-box architecture, whose security can be more objectively determined by potential customers. Hiding a paper from me by putting it somewhere in New York City is obscurity. If you hide a paper from me by putting it in a safe, and then give me the safe, and the technical documentation of the safe's locking mechanism, and I still can't get the paper, then *that* is security. (And, by the way, I think you'll find insisting that I somehow retract my statements, rather than prove me wrong by showing the quality of your product, will likely further add to the suspicion that the security of THE POUCH cannot be proven.) - -- C Mattew Curtin cmcurtin(a)ee.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Have you encrypted your data today? iQCVAwUBMiJEYRhyYuO2QvP9AQFPmwQAgimf3IhoX4wMPPNk7JY9nlFDJG2K/gO3 Xnd7ygPYAhz4BRaEl6SAaOOWiKjBA1l5EI5GhZdTL0WIWdKQv5MJROElzTVcY7nx Tq1wysgTRTLjt7XQS2FyIa1S7OSvyhJttAslbJjpl+PqCwT18bhr3Oh9Cp2g1LRq sNxdtB1BtQQ= =I28g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: Sen. Leahy's "impeccable cyberspace credentials"
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 09:50 AM 8/26/96 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote: >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 12:23:57 -0400 >From: Jonah Seiger <jseiger(a)cdt.org> >To: Declan McCullagh <declan(a)eff.org> >Cc: shabbir(a)vtw.org, fight-censorship(a)vorlon.mit.edu, brock(a)well.com, > telstar(a)wired.com >Subject: Re: INFO: Democratic convention chats online! Be there! (8/25/96) >Declan: >In a world where we have very few real friends, I simply don't understand >what you are trying to accomplish. It's fine (and healthy) to raise >concerns about the particular positions a member of Congress takes (hell, I >don't agree with everything Leahy does), but to simply dismiss Leahy as a >'no friend of the Net' is naive and counterproductive. > >Look at the record. Leahy is hands down the strongest supporter of the Net >in Congress. Period. No other Member (including our small but growing >handful of other friends like Burns, White, Wyden, Cox, Eshoo, etc) has >been a more forceful or consistent advocate for your causes for as long as >Leahy has. What exactly do you want? Perhaps we should elect you to >Congress and see how well you can do. Leahy's crypto bill sucked, bigtime. The portion of the bill criminalizing the use of encryption that had the effect of thwarting a government investigation is classic, "foot in the door" creeping government manipulation. I was particularly disgusted to notice that a number of the traditional net-freedom organizations rushed to announce that they were in favor of that bill, without even a few days of analysis, and did not retract or even restrict that support when a more careful study (specifically, that of Peter Junger) showed how seriously flawed it was. Indeed, I never saw another analysis that purported to defend Leahy's bill, despite the fact that it would have been the responsibility of any organization which claimed support of it to prepare one. I believe that it is particularly suspicious that these bills come into existance without even cursory "vetting" on the Internet. Both the Leahy bill and even the Burns crypto bill popped into public view without any indication of how they were written, or any public input on their intent and scope. Perhaps this "take it or leave it" practice is old hat to politicians, but frankly I'm disgusted at politicians' presumption that they can prepare a law with no identifiable input from the public. I am similarly disgusted at any organization (even if, ostensibly, acting in support of "net freedom") that assisted in the development of the Leahy crypto bill (and to some extent, even the Burns bill) because they clearly failed to solicit the kind of public input that such bills should automatically get. And in a sense, "the Net" doesn't NEED "strong supporters": what we need are politicians who are willing to LEAVE US ALONE! It should come as no surprise that the call you frequently see among net-freedom- supporters for new legislation is that which repeals existing restrictive laws, such as ITAR and censorship laws. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

4 3

Re: GSM cellphones cloned---Threats?
by Dave Emery 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 05:50:36AM +1000, Marc Briceno wrote: > > Several radio enineers I talked with speculated that it /might/ even be > possible to modify a standard GSM phone to act as a rouge "key reaper" > base station. I am not a radio engineer and have no way to verify this > claim. The modifications would be fairly major and rather difficult on a surface mount high density low cost phone PC board. A lot of the stuff required is in ASICs in a typical phone, and they are not in general easily adapted to playing a different role even if the full design database and phone schematics are available to the hacker which it would not be. On the other hand, some of the components of a standard GSM phone could be used to fill a number of functions in such an animal, and a couple of partially stripped GSM phone PC cards would certainly be useful as part of such. I would see such a probe base station as a briefcase size object run by a laptop or powerful palmtop spliced into two or three hacked up phone PC cards with some added signal processing logic in a FPGA or two (and maybe an added RF modem chip as well). Of course some older phone designs might be less ASIC intensive and more adaptable, although the 1.9 ghz PCS US versions are mostly pretty recent. And there may be some universal multi-standard brand that is much more software configured than others and might be an easier jumping off place - I certainly have not investigated this at all (nor do I expect to). On another topic - privacy... Your break suggests that A3/A8 may have been deliberately weakened to allow such SIM probing. Intelligence agencies are not in general interested in cloning, but for those without access to whatever magic hardware (or software) exists for cracking A5/1 at low cost in real time, the ability to once recover the SIM secret allows easy listening to all subsequent calls from that phone (or SIM) with no required cracking hardware time or access. And this is very valuable in lots of situations, such as covert operations out of hotels in foreign places where having highly classified A5 cracking boxes in tow would be a significant security risk. And for countries with GSM phone systems interested in spying on visiting diplomats, heads of state, or trade delegations who are using their GSM phones in a roaming mode and depending on the fact the GSM home switching office does not disclose their long term secret, such probing can be quietly concealed in the real traffic of a legitimate base station. The secrets recovered can then be used to crack traffic back in the visitor's home country where he may be trusting his local system to be secure. And the ability to probe the phones of visiting dignitaries from nearby hotel rooms and recover their secrets must be awfully useful to many even third rate intelligence operations - this allows listening to all their subsequent traffic without requiring an A5/1 cracking capability at all - let alone one that works real time from low cost portable units. And even if there is some sanity test in GSM phone firmware that would catch or prevent enough probes to crack the SIM secret, your physical access method allows black bag jobs to recover the SIM secret of phones left poorly guarded for a few hours. This alone is very obviously of great use to intelligence types (at least unless there is some hardware backdoor in the SIM to allow the readout in seconds rather than hours). -- Dave Emery N1PRE, die(a)die.com DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass. PGP fingerprint = 2047/4D7B08D1 DE 6E E1 CC 1F 1D 96 E2 5D 27 BD B0 24 88 C3 18

1 0

woah
by ArtNoire 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To: ArtNoire(a)aol.com Subject: woah From: ArtNoire <ArtNoire(a)aol.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:53:09 EDT Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) <a href="http://members.spree.com/iconz/index.html">Click here to see my picture</a>

1 0

[noise] Re: Cypherpunk voting - ITAR or CDA
by Alan Olsen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Ray wrote: >If the Republican candidate had been Forbes, there might have been a "don't >let the great be the enemy of the good" argument against voting >Libertarian. If Forbes was the current Republican canidate, the nation would be spending itself into debt dealing with all of the therapy bills resulting from their childrens minds being irreversably damaged from looking at the Forbe's smile on the news every night. Forbes looks to me like H.P. Lovecraft tried to design a cannidate. What Eldrich bargains has he made to get to any sort of public acceptance with a smile like that? > As it stands now, Dole is, at best, arguably the "lesser of 2 >evils," which still comes out evil in my book. As the designated partisan >Libertarian on the list, I urge all cypherpunks to vote their consciences >and pick Harry Browne and Jo Jorgensen. The mere fact that the media is >[grudgingly] covering us suggests we are finally doing something right, and >Harry is winning many Internet polls despite much fawning, hopeful coverage >for the big-eared billionaire hypocrite stealth-candidate, who has no >position but certainly would enjoy having the TLAs investigate his enemies. I have seen little to no coverage of the Libretarians this (or any) year. And even less coverage than usual now that they have a canidate who is even worth voting for. (I guess I won't vote for Pat Paulsen after all...) As for the Perotbots... Maybe someone should tell them what "perot" means in French. >I fully accept that it is likely Dole or Clinton will win, but I think it >will fill an important cypherpunk goal if the Libertarian Party candidates >get a vote large enough to be the margin of victory, and I will be very >proud of my vote, no matter who wins this election. Vote your consciences >for your own sake, and the sake of the children who will inherit the debt >of the irresponsible statists in power now. And if Dole wins and dies in office, they could just pickle him and no one would notice. It would not be the first time we had a dill-dole running the country. --- | "Remember: You can't have BSDM without BSD. - alan(a)ctrl-alt-del.com "| |"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: | | mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man | |`finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.| | http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ | alano(a)teleport.com |

1 0

Re: Microsoft Explorer security hole (fwd) MSoft's reply...
by bf578＠scn.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 15:49:33 -0700 From: Thomas Reardon <thomasre(a)MICROSOFT.com> Subject: Re: Internet Explorer security problem (Felten, RISKS-18.36) >We have discovered a security flaw in the current version (3.0) of >Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser running under Windows 95. An >attacker could exploit the flaw to run any DOS command on the machine >of an Explorer user who visits the attacker's page. We now post the virus warning dialog on local files (file: urls). We have always posted it on remote files (http: urls). Note that the root of the problem is not Java or the browser, but in macro-enabled applications. IE3 has a mechanism to warn users about safety of documents when used with common macro-enabled applications. We are have updated Microsoft Word such that by default it will not run macros embedded in documents. -Thomas > > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 01:35:07 GMT >Subject: Microsoft Explorer security hole (fwd) > >On Sun, 25 Aug 1996 13:55:30 -0600 (MDT), Carl Nation ><carl(a)iserver.com> wrote: > >To our Resellers/Customers, > >Our sysadmin received this security alert, and we thought we should >pass it along... > >------- Forwarded Message > >Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:12:59 -0400 >From: felten(a)CS.Princeton.EDU (Ed Felten) >Subject: Internet Explorer Security Problem > >We have discovered a security flaw in the current version (3.0) of >Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser running under Windows 95. An >attacker could exploit the flaw to run any DOS command on the machine of >an Explorer user who visits the attacker's page. For example, the >attacker could read, modify, or delete the victim's files, or insert a >virus or backdoor entrance into the victim's machine. We have verified >our discovery by creating a Web page that deletes a file on the machine of >any Explorer user who visits the page. > >The core of the attack is a technique for delivering a document to the >victim's browser while bypassing the security checks that would >normally be applied to the document. If the document is, for example, a >Microsoft Word template, it could contain a macro that executes any DOS >command. > >Normally, before Explorer downloads a dangerous file like a Word >document, it displays a dialog box warning that the file might contain a >virus or other dangerous content, and asking the user whether to abort the >download or to proceed with the download anyway. This gives the user a >chance to avoid the risk of a malicious document. However, our technique >allows an attacker to deliver a document without triggering the dialog >box. > >Microsoft has been notified and they are working on fixing the >problem. Until a remedy is widely available, we will not disclose further >details about the flaw. > >For more information, contact Ed Felten at felten(a)cs.princeton.edu or >609-258-5906. > >Dirk Balfanz and Ed Felten >Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University >http://www.cs.princeton.edu/sip/ > >------- End of Forwarded Message > > > > > -- ------------------------------------------ There are no facts, only interpretations. I always wanted to be somebody,

1 0

LACC: Metacomputing : got it from EurekAlert
by Charles Choi 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Metacomputing: Sharing Hardware Could Put Cash in Your Pocket While you're asleep, your home computer signs onto the Internet and looks for work. By morning, it's done complex calculations for a scientist in London, designed an ad for an Arizona business--and fattened up your bank account. This scenario--called metacomputing--could become a reality in the very near future, says Baruch Awerbuch, a professor of computer science at The Johns Hopkins University. He is studying the economics of sharing computer power over the Internet, including pricing and marketing issues. There is money to be earned, Awerbuch says, by tapping the enormous power that lies dormant while computer owners are asleep, at lunch or merely away from their terminals. At such times, these computers could earn extra cash by doing remote work for researchers or business owners in other locations. People who need extra computing horsepower or special equipment for a one-time project will line up to lease time on these idle machines, Awerbuch believes, because renting someone else's computer costs far less than buying a new one. "It makes huge economic sense," Awerbuch says. "For example, if once in a lifetime you want to use a fancy program that only runs on a particular piece of hardware, why do you need to buy this piece of hardware? Instead, you could lease a cycle on that machine in exchange for some economic favor. The opportunities are endless." Most of the technology to share hardware over telephone lines or some other network already exists. What's needed, the researcher says, is a system for buying and selling cycles of time on idle machines, along with safeguards to make sure "renters" can't pry into an owner's files. It will also require a change in the close attachment most people feel toward their computers. "People are accustomed to using only the machines that they've purchased," Awerbuch says. "They're not used to using machines that are not their own. Yet it seems silly to invest lots of money to buy more computing power when all you have to do is utilize what's already out there. Think of it this way: 90 percent of the computing power in the world is inaccessible to people, simply because we haven't set up the right mechanism to help one another." Here's how that mechanism might work, Awerbuch says: An accountant owns a PC. It crunches numbers perfectly but can't handle the elaborate graphic design work needed to create a splashy business brochure. The accountant posts a note on the Internet, offering 50 cents a minute any time that week for remote use of a Macintosh computer with graphics software. If the brochure is needed within the next hour or two, the accountant might offer $5 a minute for immediate access. A Macintosh owner, or an unattended machine that searches the Internet for work whenever it is idle, responds. The accountant takes temporary control over the Mac terminal, which might be located anywhere in the world. When the project is completed, the accountant issues an electronic payment for the time. This same system could allow a hospital to lease time on powerful computers elsewhere for demanding jobs such a medical imaging. Other companies could break complex tasks into small pieces, then farm them to small outside computers. Hardware owners could also post notices on the Internet, describing their machines, hours of availability, memory capacity and software. People who are reluctant to loan their lawn mower to a neighbor may be even less inclined to let perfect strangers use their computers by remote control. But Awerbuch believes these transactions can be sound and profitable. "This sharing should not be viewed as an altruistic thing, nor as some kind of a Communist idea, where you don't own anything personally and you must share with other people," he says. "To the contrary, this is purely an entrepreneurial arrangement, where you trade what you own in exchange for cash or some other economic benefit. The policies and approaches will be totally up to the individuals or companies or whoever is doing it. It could be quite interesting to see this electronic marketplace in action." This research, by Awerbuch and co-principal investigator Yair Amir, assistant professor of computer science at Hopkins, is funded entirely by a $1 million three-year federal grant from the Advanced Research Project Agency, Technology Management Office. Johns Hopkins University news releases can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.jhu.edu/news_info/news/ In addition, Johns Hopkins University science and medical news releases can be accessed on-line through the following services: CompuServe in the SciNews-MedNews library of the Journalism Forum under file extensions ".JHM" or ".JHU"; also in NASW Online in the same forum. Quadnet: send email to: scitech(a)quadnet.vyne.com. In the body of the message type "info Quadnet." EurekAlert! at http://www.eurekalert.org Sincerely. Quentin Holte. ( aka Charles Choi. ) You are all the Buddha. - Last words of Buddha. If you see the Buddha, kill him. - Zen proverb.

1 0

Australian Interbet Betting System Gets US Interest 08/26/96
by Joseph M. Reagle Jr. 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>ALICE SPRINGS, AUSTRALIA, 1996 AUG 26 (NB) -- An American from Washington >DC has placed the first "Interbet" on the Australian Football League (AFL), >$250 for a win on North Melbourne to beat Geelong, with Alice Springs >bookmaker CentreBet which switched on its net-based computer betting >service last week. > >CentreBet has taken more than 70 bets on the Internet since launching the >worldwide service, approved by the Northern Territory Racing and Gaming >Authority. Alice Springs, colloquially known as "The Alice," is a small >community close to Ayers Rock in the central outback of Australia where >people are few and betting is a way of life. > >CentreBet's Gerard Daffy told the Australian Associated Press news service >he expects keen Interbet interest from Asians who are big fans of English >soccer and also from Americans whom he expects to bet on a variety of major >sporting events, starting with this week's US Open tennis and the upcoming >NFL season. > >However the AFL bet from America came right out of left field (AFL, or >Australian Rules football, a descendant of Ireland's Gaelic football, is >played seriously only in several Australian States, but is shown regularly >on some US cable-TV services). "The guy who put the bet on North Melbourne >is part of an Australian Rules fan club in the US," said Daffy. "There's >another American in Michigan who has opened an Interbet account to bet on >the AFL as well." > >For the record: the fan who bet on North Melbourne can forget his $250. >Geelong downed North Melbourne at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on Saturday >by 109 points to 96. > >CentreBet can be reached at http://www.taunet.com.au/centrebet > >(19960826) > > > _______________________ Regards, Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. -Paul Valery Joseph Reagle http://rpcp.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html reagle(a)mit.edu E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65 BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E

1 0

Net Censorship in the Uk
by Sean Gabb 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You may have seen this already. If so apologies. However, it is a blatant example of police oppression and stupidity. If nothing else, just imagine how much of the taxpayers' money it cost to decide whether alt.binaries.erotica.fetish.feet contravenes the Obscene Publications Act 1959. Sean Gabb Editor Free Life ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 96 15:44:45 BST From: Sean Gabb <cea01sig(a)gold.ac.uk> To: cea01sig(a)gold.ac.uk Subject: theMet.html LETTER FROM THE METROPOLITAN POLICE _________________________________________________________________ METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE Clubs and Vice Unit Charing Cross Police Station Agar Street London WC2N 4JP Telephone: 0171 321 7752 Facsimile: 0171 321 7762 To: All Internet Service Providers Dear Sir / Madam Pornographic Material on the Internet Further to the seminar held at New Scotland Yard on 2nd August I enclose, as promised by Superintendent Mike Hoskins, a list of those Newsgroups which we believe contain pornographic material. We have attempted to confirm that the Newsgroups listed currently contain this offensive material but as you will be only too aware the content is continually changing and you will need to satisfy yourself about the nature and content before taking any action. Furthermore, this list is not exhaustive and we are looking to you to monitor your Newsgroups identifying and taking necessary action against those others found to contain such material. As you will be aware the publication of obscene articles is an offence. This list is only the starting point and we hope, with the co-operation and assistance of the industry and your trade organisations, to be moving quickly towards the eradication of this type of Newsgroup from the Internet. At the seminar we debated the means of maintaining an up to date list and you will recall that ISPA volunteered to pool information and assist in this initiative. However, we are very anxious that all service providers should be taking positive action now, whether or not they are members of a trade association. We trust that with your co-operation and self regulation it will not be necessary for us to move to an enforcement policy. Yours Faithfully Stephen French Chief Inspector List alt.binaries.pictures.boys alt.binaries.pictures.child.erotica.female alt.binaries.pictures.child.erotica.male alt.binaries.pictures.children alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.children alt.binaries.pictures.erotica child alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.female alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.male alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.lolita alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.fuck alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.young alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.fucking alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.misc alt.sex.boys alt.sex.children alt.sex.fetish.tinygirls alt.sex.girls alt.sex.incest alt.sex.intergen alt.sex.pedophile.mike-labbe alt.sex.pedophilia. alt.sex.pedophilia.boys alt.sex.pedophilia.girls alt.sex.pedophilia.swaps alt.sex.pedophilia.pictures alt.sex.pre-teens alt.sex.teens alt.sex.weight-gain 0000000928 0000000418 y alt.fan.cock-sucking 0000001482 0000001311 y alt.binaries.pictures.voyeurism 0000005117 0000004495 alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.fucking 0000001097 00000861 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.voyeurism 0000011396 0000010495 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.young 0000006499 0000005208 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.uniform 0000001274 0000001110 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.urine 0000005542 0000004911 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.fuck 0000003398 0000003162 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.uncut 0000002220 0000001970 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.spanking 0000005484 0000004927 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.female.masturbation 0000003770 0000003085 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pornstars 0000010919 0000010192 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen 0000004945 0000004100 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.oral 0000013599 0000012668 y alt.binaries.fetish.scat 0000000958 0000000842 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.anime 0000001886 0000001724 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.centerfolds 0000015743 0000014219 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.senior-citizens 0000004426 0000003944 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.animals 0000001511 0000001403 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.art.pin-up 0000003274 0000002916 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.breasts.small 0000004812 0000004400 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.butts 0000010763 0000010048 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cheerleaders 0000010297 0000009498 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.disney 0000001471 0000001281 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.feet 0000008454 0000007840 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.hair 0000003162 0000002804 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.senior-citizens 0000004042 0000003695 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen 0000005349 0000005098 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male.anal 0000004414 0000004164 y alt.sex.pedophile.mike-labbe 0000001015 0000000752 y alt.sex.masturbation 0000004038 0000002204 y alt.sex.fetish.tickling 0000014620 0000011227 y alt.sex.fetish.waifs 0000007005 0000005391 y alt.sex.fetish.watersports 0000015798 0000012599 y alt.sex.fetish.wrestling 0000008522 0000006281 y alt.sex.first-time 0000007333 0000005072 y alt.sex.fetish.girl.watchers 0000006418 0000003795 y alt.sex.homosexual 0000025299 0000020411 y alt.sex.incest 0000016099 0000009889 y alt.sex.intergen 0000012715 0000010756 y alt.sex.jp 0000003101 0000002194 y alt.sex.magazines 0000016261 0000012956 y alt.sex.masturbation 0000066212 0000058405 y alt.sex.movies 0000090182 0000084718 y alt.sex.necrophilia 0000003469 0000002177 y alt.sex.pedophilia 0000040531 0000026257 y alt.sex.pictures 0000120660 0000097707 y alt.sex.pictures.female 0000091859 0000067880 y alt.sex.pictures.male 0000040412 0000032695 y alt.sex.services 0000038170 0000032355 y alt.sex.spam 0000000717 0000000283 y alt.sex.spanking 0000043401 0000037424 y alt.sex.stories 0000130604 0000115635 y alt.sex.strip-clubs 0000035850 0000030078 y alt.magazines.pornographic 0000005618 0000003705 y alt.magick.sex 0000007227 0000006197 y alt.personals.spanking.punishment 0000006983 0000005028 y alt.sex. 0000318682 0000299098 alt.sex.anal 0000028283 0000020514 y alt.sex.bestiality 0000039473 0000035720 y alt.sex.bondage 0000175209 0000162338 y alt.sex.breast 0000035836 0000029671 y alt.sex.enemas 0000009235 0000007242 y alt.sex.exhibitionism 0000046981 0000035201 y alt.sex.fat 0000015956 0000013563 y alt.sex.fetish.diapers 0000012816 0000010872 y alt.sex.fetish.fa 0000015012 0000010470 y alt.sex.fetish.feet 0000025850 0000022025 y alt.sex.fetish.hair 0000011779 0000010356 y alt.sex.fetish.orientals 0000047159 0000044315 y alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica 0000094765 0000092313 alt.binaries.pictures.boys 0000025827 0000025062 y alt.binaries.pictures.children 0000009753 0000009586 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica 0000387356 0000382534 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.d 0000012832 0000012505 y alt.binaries.pictures.amateur.female 0000104107 0000100909 y alt.binaries.pictures.amateur.male 0000020070 0000019186 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.anime 0000031144 0000030438 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bestiality 0000022378 0000021836 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blondes 0000061623 0000059763 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bondage 0000060612 0000058636 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cartoons 0000023721 0000023233 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.female 00000155979 0000152810 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.furry 0000007251 0000007021 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.gaymen 0000047272 0000045207 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male 0000137705 0000135723 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica. orientals 0000096484 0000094139 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pregnant 0000000038 0000000039 m alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen 0000048099 0000046561 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.d 0000005063 0000004755 y alt.binaries.pictures.girlfriend 0000029946 0000029100 y alt.binaries.pictures.girlfriends 0000055197 0000053838 y alt.binaries.pictures.girl 0000022149 0000021105 y alt.binaries.pictures.horny.nurses 0000001839 0000001704 y alt.binaries.pictures.pictures.nudism 0000032432 0000031050 y alt.binaries.pictures.tasteless 0000036867 0000036442 y alt.homosexual 0000080096 0000072533 y alt.sex.swingers 0000027930 0000020021 y alt.sex.telephone 0000027530 0000021705 y alt.sex.trans 0000015985 0000011104 y alt.sex.wanted 0000082382 0000071809 y alt.sex.watersports 0000005838 0000003666 y alt.sex.bestiality.pictures 0000000791 0000000300 y alt.sex.children 0000001311 0000000690 y alt.sex.cu-seeme 0000001049 0000000273 y alt.sex.fetish.scat 0000002756 0000001143 y alt.sex.fetish.tinygirls 0000003322 0000001229 y alt.sex.fetish.wet-and-messy 0000003209 0000001432 y alt.sex.oral 0000007820 0000003177 y alt.sex.orgy 0000004025 0000001330 y alt.sex.pedophilia.girls 0000001130 0000000267 y alt.sex.pedophilia.pictures 0000001138 0000000276 y alt.sex.pictures.d 0000005114 0000002086 y alt.sex.stories.gay 0000002918 0000000997 y alt.sex.stories.tg 0000001831 0000001078 y alt.sex.super-size 0000001987 0000000711 y alt.sex.tasteless 0000001003 0000000202 y alt.sex.teens 0000002394 0000000540 y alt.sex.video-swap 0000001363 0000000489 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.black.male 0000012581 0000012054 y alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children 0000005812 0000005117 y alt.sex.sm.fig 0000006729 0000004915 y _________________________________________________________________

1 0