July 2018 - cypherpunks-legacy

new tech report on easy-to-use IPsec
by Steven Bellovin 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Folks on this list may be interested in a new tech report: Shreyas Srivatsan, Maritza Johnson, and Steven M. Bellovin. Simple-VPN: Simple IPsec configuration. Technical Report CUCS-020-10, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, July 2010. http://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=1433 The IPsec protocol promised easy, ubiquitous encryption. That has never happened. For the most part, IPsec usage is confined to VPNs for road warriors, largely due to needless configuration complexity and incompatible implementations. We have designed a simple VPN configuration language that hides the unwanted complexities. Virtually no options are necessary or possible. The administrator specifies the absolute minimum of information: the authorized hosts, their operating systems, and a little about the network topology; everything else, including certificate generation, is automatic. Our implementation includes a multitarget compiler, which generates implementation-specific configuration files for three different platforms; others are easy to add. We hope to have the code up on Sourceforge soon. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)metzdowd.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: 27C3 on Tor
by Roc Admin 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Not sure if anyone else watched the video but of course there is a different story than the Wired article. If you don't want to sit through the whole hour, here's how I would sum it up: The talk in general was about modern tactics for profiling web users. They actually had some interesting stuff to say about how easily and accurately they were able to correlate a user to his or her web traffic but that's off topic. My take away from the entire thing is that there are new technologies to apply machine learning for automated statistical analysis of traffic. In other words, the attacks Nick referenced of 2002 are more feasible. (They do admit that this is nothing new) The same rules apply though and that is you can only be profiled if you are performing the activities that they have in their database and it seems to me that this is more difficult than they make it sound. Profiling a website that has streaming content would be difficult to nail down into a set profile. They conclude by saying that the easiest way to protect yourself is to do multiple things at the same time which increases the likliness that they can profile your activity to their database. I seem to remember a Google Code project that generated random data to obfuscate your fingerprint. Anyone remember? You can see in the video at 31:48 when they start specifically talking about Tor. The specifics of their version of the attack look like this: 1) The attack starts out where the attacker sets up a Tor client running the same OS version and browser and uses tools to profile a website like slashdot.org. 2) their "website profiling tool of doom" makes connections to the website they want to profile. They say that after 2000 requests over a 2 week period, they are able to accurately profile a website no matter what specific content is on the page. This is metadata profiling like packet size, direction, etc. 3) After they have a database of sites, they intercept a Tor client's traffic locally and correlate it with their data. They make a comment that Andriy Panchenko is one of the people that increased the accuracy of this attack by a lot but they don't give the details of what he added. His website is here but I didn't find any details: http://lorre.uni.lu/~andriy/ Prior to his involvement, the attack was at a 3% accuracy. They really don't have any suggestions for the Tor network. They did say that padding, as I originally thought would help, doesn't affect this attack so that wouldn't prevent the attack. Roger, it sounds like you had some specific ideas as to where to put the padding compared to a global value so maybe that's different than what they were talking about. They do comment that TCP fragmentation over the Tor network causes size variation of packets over which makes things easier. Not sure how much value there is in working on that aspect. -- ROC Admin On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Roger Dingledine <arma(a)mit.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 08:51:30PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> From the wired.com article, this sounds _exactly_ like the old website >> fingerprinting attack, which has been known since 2002: >> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#hintz02 >> >> It would be neat if somebody could send a pointer to the authors' >> actual results. > > See also point 3 at > https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/research.html.en#Ideas > It's been sitting on our "this is important to learn more about" > research list for years. > > It's also listed in the talk I did at 25c3: > http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/Fahrplan/events/2977.en.html > http://freehaven.net/~arma/slides-25c3.pdf (slide 30) > > So I'm glad to see more attention to the attack, but a bit frustrated that > we (the research community) are not farther along at understanding it. > > Two other things to note: > > The website fingerprinting attack works against other anonymity systems > too, in most cases even more straightforwardly than against Tor. We've > got 8+ years in the literature of applying it to other systems (most > thoroughly just attacking SSL streams to learn what web page is being > fetched despite the encryption), and in the past few years people have > improved the attack to get it to work against Tor also. As I understand > it, even now it only works consistently when they assume laboratory > conditions. That isn't to say that it won't work in real-world conditions > -- just that it's a real hassle to get all the details right so most > researchers don't put in the required engineering work. > > What I'm really looking forward to is learning what modifications to Tor > might slow down the attack. For example, what happens if we move to a 1024 > byte cell by default, or if we randomly add some extra cells periodically, > or if we ask the entry node to add padding cells so the responses we get > are multiples of 10KB? It would seem that there is a tradeoff between > bandwidth overhead (wasted bytes) and protection against this attack, > but I hope there are smart points in the tradeoff space. Alas, we're > still not really to that point yet -- we don't know how well it actually > works in practice against vanilla Tor, so it doesn't make sense to ask > how well it would work in practice against a modified Tor design. > > --Roger > > *********************************************************************** > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo(a)torproject.org with > unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ > *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo(a)torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [cryptography] Digital cash in the news...
by Steven Bellovin 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:16 55PM, John Levine wrote: > In article <021CCBA9-9203-4896-8412-481B94595B20(a)cs.columbia.edu> you write: >> http://gcn.com/articles/2011/06/09/bitcoins-digital-currency-silk-road-char… > > I wouldn't call bitcoins digital cash. They're more like digital > tulip bulbs, or bearer shares of theglobe.com. > > Whatever they are, it's a self limiting problem since the bubble will > burst soon enough. > My point in posting the item to this list was not to discuss whether or not bitcoins are real digital cash, but to note that the technology has now been publicly mentioned at the policy level. But is it cash? When my son was four years old, he asked me why a dollar bill was worth a dollar. He didn't like my answer, even though it was absolutely correct: "because we all agree that it is". If you can buy things with it, it's money, unless it has some intrinsic utility of its own; if it does have intrinsic value, it's a barter transaction. Calling it "digital tulip bulbs" is a way of saying that bitcoins are not a very stable currency; with that I have no quarrel. (Don't get me started on the gold standard (I shouldn't even add this note). But I do suggest you read the (very brief) description in Steinberg's new biography "Bismarck: A Life" of the economic woes the gold standard caused in late 19th century Prussia and the other states of the Reich .) --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography(a)randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and HTTPS graphic
by Paul Syverson 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:14:39PM -0500, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Paul Syverson <syverson(a)itd.nrl.navy.mil> wrote: > > > I'm a mere four years behind in putting my work up on the web, and > > > this one wasn't co-authored so nobody else did either. I'll try to do > > > something about that in my copious free time this week and send a > > > link. > > > > Please do, this attack you mention is one I've been very interested > > in. I'm sure many others would also love to read more about it. > > > I'll try to get to it soon. And there was a star in the east... I actually updated my webpage, not as fully as I would like, but I updated all the dead links and added about a dozen or so papers. In particular there is now a link to the "Why I'm not an Entropist" paper, the "Practical Vulnerabilities of the Tor Anonymity Network" paper that Andrew asked me to post over a year ago, my recent historical review "A Peel of Onion", etc. HTH. -Paul _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

None
by None 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

-- Rayservers http://www.rayservers.com/ Zurich: +41 43 5000 728 London: +44 20 30 02 74 72 Panama: +507 832 1846 San Francisco: +1 408 419 1978 USA Toll Free: +1 888 265 5009 10:00 - 24:00 GMT We prefer to be paid in gold Globalsb" and silver Islesb" Global Standardb" - Global Settlement Foundation http://www.global-settlement.org/ Our PGP key for support(a)rayservers.com 0x079CCE10 on http://keyserver.rayservers.com/

1 0

None
by Chris 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

2011 10:45:13 -0400 ________________________________ Once law enforcement is effective enough to prevent the average criminal from having access to firearms, then the law-abiding population can be compelled to disarm. That day is coming through US force as "Operation Gun Runner" from the ATF allowed Mexican drug cartel straw purchasers to come in, purchase 5 or so AK-47 rifles, and when the gun store owner had suspicions about not selling it - the ATF told the owner to "let the guns walk" so the group could track down the weapons. Unfortunately, those weapons were used to kill a DEA agent in Mexico and a Border Patrol agent who was only armed with bean bag rounds in his shotgun then died trying to cycle out those rounds to put in live rounds. Also with al-CIAda patsy Adam Gahdan inaccurately reporting in his latest video to other jihadists about purchasing "automatic weapons" from gun shows, I believe the ball is rolling for everyone in the United States to be disarmed through force by new legislation to outlaw weapons. I do not think the average gun owner would ever disarm because the gun culture in our country is so deep and passionate in any freedom loving citizen's blood. The Second Amendment, in my opinion and most gun owners agree with, was put in the Bill of Rights for the average citizen to remove tyrants if the process of democracy does not work. At present, the average criminal in my area does not have firearms, and so I do not own one. Gun crime is on the increase, however, so this situation may change. Better get one before it's too late :-) -- --C "The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they're going to be when you kill them." - Sir William Clayton

1 0

Re: [cryptography] Digital cash in the news...
by Steven Bellovin 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:16 55PM, John Levine wrote: > In article <021CCBA9-9203-4896-8412-481B94595B20(a)cs.columbia.edu> you write: >> http://gcn.com/articles/2011/06/09/bitcoins-digital-currency-silk-road-char… > > I wouldn't call bitcoins digital cash. They're more like digital > tulip bulbs, or bearer shares of theglobe.com. > > Whatever they are, it's a self limiting problem since the bubble will > burst soon enough. > My point in posting the item to this list was not to discuss whether or not bitcoins are real digital cash, but to note that the technology has now been publicly mentioned at the policy level. But is it cash? When my son was four years old, he asked me why a dollar bill was worth a dollar. He didn't like my answer, even though it was absolutely correct: "because we all agree that it is". If you can buy things with it, it's money, unless it has some intrinsic utility of its own; if it does have intrinsic value, it's a barter transaction. Calling it "digital tulip bulbs" is a way of saying that bitcoins are not a very stable currency; with that I have no quarrel. (Don't get me started on the gold standard (I shouldn't even add this note). But I do suggest you read the (very brief) description in Steinberg's new biography "Bismarck: A Life" of the economic woes the gold standard caused in late 19th century Prussia and the other states of the Reich .) --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography(a)randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and HTTPS graphic
by Paul Syverson 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:14:39PM -0500, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Paul Syverson <syverson(a)itd.nrl.navy.mil> wrote: > > > I'm a mere four years behind in putting my work up on the web, and > > > this one wasn't co-authored so nobody else did either. I'll try to do > > > something about that in my copious free time this week and send a > > > link. > > > > Please do, this attack you mention is one I've been very interested > > in. I'm sure many others would also love to read more about it. > > > I'll try to get to it soon. And there was a star in the east... I actually updated my webpage, not as fully as I would like, but I updated all the dead links and added about a dozen or so papers. In particular there is now a link to the "Why I'm not an Entropist" paper, the "Practical Vulnerabilities of the Tor Anonymity Network" paper that Andrew asked me to post over a year ago, my recent historical review "A Peel of Onion", etc. HTH. -Paul _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
by Barry Shein 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Back in the early days of the public internet we didn't require any id to create an account, just that you found a way to pay us. We had anonymous accts some of whom dropped by personally to pay their bill, some said hello but I usually didn't know their names and that's how they wanted it, I'd answer "hello <ACCOUNT>", whatever their login was if I recognized them. Some mailed in something, a mail order, even currency tho that was rare but it did happen, or had someone else drop by to pay in cash (that is, no idea if they were local.) LEO occasionally served a warrant for information, usually child porn biz (more than just accessing child porn, selling it) tho I don't remember any anonymous accts being involved. I never expected to be held accountable for anyone's behavior unless I was knowingly involved somehow (just the usual caveat.) LEO never showed any particular interest in the fact that we were ok with anonymous accounts. If I was made aware of illegal activities we'd shut them off, didn't really happen much, maybe some credible "hacking" complaint on occasion. It's funny, it's all illusion like show business. It's not hard to set up anonymous service, crap, just drop in at any wi-fi hotspot, many just ask you to click that you accept their T&Cs and you're on. Would they raid them, I was just using one at a major hospital this week that was just like that, if someone used that for child porn etc? But I guess stick your nose out and say you're specifically offering anon accts and watch out I guess. -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs(a)TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo* ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[tahoe-lafs-weekly-news] TWN15
by Patrick R McDonald 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 ========================================================= Tahoe-LAFS Weekly News, issue number 15, October 16, 2011 ========================================================= Welcome to the Tahoe-LAFS Weekly News (TWN). Tahoe-LAFS_ is a secure, distributed storage system. `View TWN on the web`_ *or* `subscribe to TWN`_. If you would like to view the "new and improved" TWN, complete with pictures; please take a `look`_. .. _Tahoe-LAFS: http://tahoe-lafs.org .. _View TWN on the web: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/TahoeLAFSWeeklyNews .. _subscribe to TWN: http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-lafs-weekly-news .. _look: http://tahoe-lafs.org/~marlowe/TWN15.html Announcements and News ====================== Tahoe-LAFS v1.9.0 Beta 1 Released - --------------------------------- Tahoe-LAFS proudly released `1.9.0 beta 1`_. Below are the changes between beta 1 and alpha2: * CLI: use "tahoe put --format=MDMF" to create an MDMF file, instead of "tahoe put --mutable --mutable-type=MDMF" * web: WUI now has a three-item radiobox (CHK, SDMF, MDMF) instead of the tricky one-togglebutton+two-item-radiobox combination * web-API t=JSON output now emits upper-case "format: MDMF" instead of lower-case "mutable-type: mdmf" * MDMF filecaps no longer include the extra two "extension fields" (containing 'k' and segsize), and tolerate (ignore) arbitrary extension fields from the future The beta is available `here`_ in tar.gz, tar.bz2, zip and -SUMO variants. You can also fetch it via any of our fine version control systems: darcs get --lazy --tag=allmydata-tahoe-1.9.0b1 \ http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/trunk tahoe-lafs-1.9.0b1 or git clone -b allmydata-tahoe-1.9.0b1 git://github.com/warner/tahoe-lafs.git or, if you already have a git checkout: git pull git checkout allmydata-tahoe-1.9.0b1 The following items remaining for a final release: * docs * packaging tests * test against the new Foolscap release, 0.6.2, also current Twisted trunk Please download the beta and test it out. Our hope is to release 1.9.0 at the end of this month. .. _1.9.0 beta 1: .. http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-October/006708.html .. _`here`: http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/tarballs/ Foolscap 0.6.2 Release - ---------------------- Brian |brian| released Foolscap `0.6.2`_. This release fixes an incompatibility with the current Twisted trunk, which will cause problems when the next Twisted release comes out. The previous Foolscap would only work with Twisted 11.0. This would cause issues for Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.0, which has dependencies on both pieces of software. The new release supports both Twisted 11.0 and the current Twisted trunk. .. _`0.6.2`: .. http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-October/006721.html Commercial Supporter of the Week ================================ The Commercial Support of the Week is Least Authority Enterprises (LAE). LAE is working on bringing *freedom-compatible* storage to the end user. *Freedom compatible* storage means you can take advantage of online service providers while still retaining control over your data. LAE's first product is Tahoe-LAFS on S3. You can watch their progress in ticket `999`_ as they to enable Tahoe-LAFS support for multiple backends, not just S3. LAE also employs three Tahoe-LAFS developers: Zooko |zooko|, David-Sarah |davidsarah| and Josh Wilcox |wilcox|. .. _`999`: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/999 - From the tahoe-dev Mailing List =============================== Accounting - ------------------------ Brian announced `Accounting 11.10`_. This tracks who uses what space. It will allow grids to stop offering space once a user exceeds their quota. Eventually, this could be expanded to incorporate Bitcoin. A user once they exceeded their quota could buy additional space through Bitcoin. Accounting offers full backwards compatibility with introducers which don't support accounting. Below are instructions how to test it: 1. install http://github.com/warner/python-ed25519 2. git clone -b accounting https://github.com/warner/tahoe-lafs.git 3. cd tahoe-lafs 4. start a grid with this version (you want a new Introducer, client, and servers) .. _`Accounting 11.10`: .. http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-October/006706.html Tahoe-LAFS Logo - --------------- Zooko provided a post to the list regarding the `logo`_ for Tahoe-LAFS. We would like to have a few shirts with the logo for the next `Summit`_. Ticket `1185`_ covers the current candidates for the logo. Please post your thoughts regarding the designs to this ticket. Also if you are interested in updating the web site to the new logo and printing the tshirts, please let Zooko know. .. _`logo`: .. http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-October/006712.html .. _`Summit`: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/Summit .. _`1185`: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1185# Patch Needing Review of the Week ================================ There are three (3) tickets still needing review for 1.9: * 393_: MDMF * 1265_: New Visualizer is insufficiently labelled/documented (plus layout problem) * 1398_: make docs/performance.rst more precise and accurate Let's see if we can't get these reviewed and 1.9 out the door. .. _393: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/393 .. _1265: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1265 .. _1398: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1398 - ---- *The Tahoe-LAFS Weekly News is published once a week by The Tahoe-LAFS* *Software Foundation, President and Treasurer: Peter Secor* |peter| *. Scribes: Patrick "marlowe" McDonald* |marlowe| *, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn* *, Editor: Zooko.* `View TWN on the web`_ *or* `subscribe to TWN`_ *. Send your news stories to* `marlowe(a)antagonism.org`_ *b submission deadline: Friday night.* .. _marlowe(a)antagonism.org: mailto:marlowe@antagonism.org .. |zooko| image:: zooko.png :height: 35 :alt: zooko :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs .. |brian| image:: warner.png :height: 35 :alt: brian :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs .. |peter| image:: psecor.jpg :height: 35 :alt: peter :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs .. |marlowe| image:: marlowe-x75-bw.jpg :height: 35 :alt: marlowe :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs .. |davidsarah| image:: davidsarah_bw.png :height: 35 :alt: davidsarah :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs .. |wilcox| image:: wilcox.png :height: 35 :alt: wilcox :target: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AboutUs - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------- | Patrick R. McDonald GPG Key: A2D1E972 | | https://www.antagonism.org/ <marlowe(a)antagonism.org> | | <mcdonald.patrick.r(a)gmail.com> | | <patrick(a)opensecurityfoundation.org> | - ---------------------------------------------------------------- | Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium | - ---------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOm21dAAoJEAT4nRyi0elyfpEP/2SO8HlGhdlWtj2DC8napEVU rJn5OelH7mDt+RcKLwbOzLR9CGdaz+aapRPIIZ8rn9eYPuZZiqDxB0zjZ9tOUDkk 6FqQaqrQsZRwBcbTDK5NLJYyMH62p6a8uzs15Ph/YXXMPvOTIegNbARya6pocHjW ffZvHDX/QspCi44nfh28vnpkji+WAJQY0fGnxCe0uSiWBJRk3GWytNtr5Bl7PRaC X1fgDbqcFMiJR3Fi9x5jySttZmzLRTThIBEgIKlrgVrZm5UbvBVqjumltsf+9oL3 NibJWqWdCAdyBLDWWYILgQk3EQujBfShNgS1pRMp1xHw8ZjvcHpv99ipyuRuI/u8 02kWbMdRDhLs071nHxGLL/b8Ji4NzG2y59jN+VNpImjIgPcfsNmzAEYLYZkM56NT DA4dZimmwyqXAPaTizlmFGZX/HX5ZMsvGp3T2aKSjcfuz8+ND3SSqrmzOF2MKkaj 06trywwRuLa5k/nROOmxNlgzAQm9pIbTiMXSuhBEV6uqVqiCBy5GRk6p6Vnuow7d bIXoDg71AeIh2ptFXp9mF2DnqdtgpIfdhDHOV8+Tl6GEb1QUtzLQHSfbKXu3vSO0 diFaXOnVN7kkhaeAJ6FuTXgs3v09HYjZuhkVnOV7vRjlRga0HWQCYw30bmAX/6Af 8d81UIlhzOBI4nLOE2qQ =VWOT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tahoe-lafs-weekly-news mailing list tahoe-lafs-weekly-news(a)tahoe-lafs.org http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-lafs-weekly-news ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0