June 2004 - cypherpunks-legacy

[FoRK] Operation See-No-Evil (fwd from jbone@place.org)
by Eugen Leitl 23 Jun '04

23 Jun '04

----- Forwarded message from Contempt for Meatheads <jbone(a)place.org> -----

1 0

Hiibel case on NPR Talk Of The Nation Wednesday 11am PDT
by Bill Stewart 23 Jun '04

23 Jun '04

I heard an announcement on NPR tonight that tomorrow's Talk Of The Nation program will be discussing the "Papers Please" case. http://www.npr.org/programs/totn/ . Mark Rotenberg of EPIC will be on. Wed, June 23, 2004 -- 11:00am PDT KQED.ORG Refusing to give your name to a police officer could get you arrested. That's what the Supreme Court ruled this week. Guests: Bill Johnson, executive director and legal counsel of the National Association of Police Organizations; and Marc Rotenberg, president of Electronic Privacy Information Center.

1 0

[IP] When police ask your name, you must give it, Supreme Court says (fwd from dave@farber.net)
by Eugen Leitl 22 Jun '04

22 Jun '04

----- Forwarded message from dave(a)farber.net -----

7 8

Genetically Engineered Virus Reduces Cocaine Cravings
by Bill Stewart 22 Jun '04

22 Jun '04

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3825177.stm The Beeb's got a story about a virus that reduces the effects of cocaine in rats, being better at getting appropriate proteins to appropriate parts of the brain. The news story talks about the potential for use in treatment (says it's way too early to tell, and says that addictive behaviours are psychologically complex so they can't predict if addicts would just switch to other drugs if the virus makes coke not work for them, but that's the kind of thing people in the treatment biz say), but the parts of the story that talk about what the virus actually does talk about reduction in the direct effects of cocaine on rat behaviour, not the effects on withdrawal. Meanwhile, Dept of Homeland Security is pricing syringes... ---- Bill Stewart bill.stewart(a)pobox.com

1 0

Police fudge on ID theft: expert
by R. A. Hettinga 22 Jun '04

22 Jun '04

<http://australianit.news.com.au/common/print/0,7208,9890733%5E15319%5E%5Enb…> Australian IT Police fudge on ID theft: expert Kelly Mills JUNE 22, 2004 REPORTS of increasing identity fraud attacks have been exaggerated by law enforcement agencies seeking to maintain budgets, according to a former Scotland Yard detective. Identity fraud attacks, such as phishing, have increased in the past year as international syndicates target Australian financial institutions. However, SAS Institute fraud and anti-money laundering solutions director Rowan Bosworth-Davies, a former Scotland Yard detective and lawyer, says identity theft is relatively rare. "I would need more evidence from law enforcement agencies of identity theft before I got too excited about it," he says. "It is a sexy subject and you can say what you like and no-one will say that you are wrong." Bosworth-Davies says there is a lot of hype around identity theft and a great deal of misinformation, which he attributes partly to some police agencies that want to increase funding. "If someone was living the life of Riley on your credit card, wouldn't you know within a month, when you got your credit card statement?" Bosworth-Davies says genuine cases of identity fraud, using stolen credit card details and other identity documents, are relatively few. Speaking at the SAS International Forum 2004 in Copenhagen, Bosworth-Davies was also critical of banks' ability to deal with money laundering. Prior to September 11, 2001, there was debate about money laundering, and if banks had software it was largely developed internally, he says. In the past three or four years, however, large banks had installed anti-money-laundering software to comply with new international regulations. "Leading banks in the UK have adopted new solutions, but it would be less true in Australia, which has different regulatory drivers." Kelly Mills attended SAS Forum International 2004 in Copenhagen as a guest of SAS Australia. This report appears on australianIT.com.au. -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

geographic MACs
by Eugen Leitl 22 Jun '04

22 Jun '04

MAC address space is enough for roughly one device/square meter of Earth surface. This is about enough for wireless MAC (24 bit for longitude/latitude each) assigment from, say, WGS 84. Not enough for elevation, but given that it's rough coordinates, injecting some noise should remove potential (rare) address collisions. Pluses are the MACs can be assigned by the system (negotiating how to back off of potential collisions). Lacking relativistic pings, signal strength is useful for rough distance estimates of internode distance. Obviously, WiFi boxes which can directly parse NMEA input can compute the MAC directly, otherwise it's a one-time (for immobile nodes) operation at setup. This is obviously of use for geographic routing in wireless meshes, geographically constrained queries/broadcast, etc. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

1 0

Citizen Chics Must Put Out
by Tyler Durden 21 Jun '04

21 Jun '04

OK...so say an officer is at the beach and spots some hot chick in a bathing suit, with obviously no ID on her person. And let's say this officer "believes" that this chick has a bag of pot at home. Can he just go and arrest her? -TD >From: Eric Cordian <emc(a)artifact.psychedelic.net> >To: cypherpunks(a)minder.net >Subject: Citizen Units Must Give Names >Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:44 -0700 (PDT) > >One used to have the right to be known by any name one wished, as long as >one did not do so for the purpose of committing fraud, or impersonating >someone else. > >One certainly has an absolute right to refuse to speak to a government >employee when accosted. > >So it is difficult to understand the Court's "reasoning" in this case. > >http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5473543 > >----- > >WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that >people are required to identify themselves when asked to do so by police, >and rejected arguments that it violates their constitutional rights to >privacy and to remain silent. > >... > >-- >Eric Michael Cordian 0+ >O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division >"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law" > _________________________________________________________________ Watch the online reality show Mixed Messages with a friend and enter to win a trip to NY http://www.msnmessenger-download.click-url.com/go/onm00200497ave/direct/01/

6 5

Citizen Units Must Give Names
by Eric Cordian 21 Jun '04

21 Jun '04

One used to have the right to be known by any name one wished, as long as one did not do so for the purpose of committing fraud, or impersonating someone else. One certainly has an absolute right to refuse to speak to a government employee when accosted. So it is difficult to understand the Court's "reasoning" in this case. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5473543 ----- WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that people are required to identify themselves when asked to do so by police, and rejected arguments that it violates their constitutional rights to privacy and to remain silent. ... -- Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

1 0

Skype for Linux released
by Eugen Leitl 21 Jun '04

21 Jun '04

http://www.skype.com/download_linux.html FYI. Binary-only, of course. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

1 0

Gross Minus Net Equals Zero: Repeal the Sixteenth Amendment
by R. A. Hettinga 20 Jun '04

20 Jun '04

<http://www.capmag.com/articlePrint.asp?ID=3745> Gross Minus Net Equals Zero: Repeal the Sixteenth Amendment by Michael Marriott (June 20, 2004) Article website address: http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3745 Summary: Let us together repeal the sixteenth amendment to the Constitution by the year 2013. [CAPMAG.COM] When I worked in Saudi Arabia as a technical consultant in the 1990s, my coworkers and I were astounded upon receiving our first paycheck: we actually were paid the full amount we had earned. Gross pay minus net pay equaled zero. Never before or since in my lifetime has such a thing happened. Since every working person in the United States deserves such a delightful, fulfilling experience I would like to submit the following proposition. Let us together repeal the sixteenth amendment to the Constitution by the year 2013. This infamous income tax amendment was passed in 1909 by "progressive" Republicans as the best method to collect government revenue, ensure "fairness" and get around the pesky Supreme Court. The latter had the gall to rule in the late 19th century that such levies on income were unconstitutional. Undaunted, the politicians of the era decided that an income tax amendment was necessary. It required four years for the states to ratify the amendment, which became part of the Constitution in 1913. Hence 2013 presents a nice target date for the amendment's repeal (rather then a year of mournful reminders, 2013 could become a jubilee year that strikes a majestic blow in favor of individual rights). Further, we all can participate in the nine year debate to determine if our country is to be truly free. Repeal of the 16th amendment would be a real and symbolic reaffirmation that our government is truly limited; no other single act we could possibly perform would so effectively reinforce the idea that America is a country dedicated to individual happiness. Consider some of the travesties the 16th amendment has spawned in the last one hundred years. The power to tax has become the ultimate politician plaything. The so-called "progressive" nature of the tax code allows permutations uncountable as politicos raise, then lower, individual tax rates. The tax code can tailored to benefit specific special interest groups to garner bloc votes. As seventy five percent of government revenue is made possible by this insidious amendment, great sums become available to wage war, pay premium prices for toilet seats and allow certain folks to sit and do nothing for a living. Upon approval of the 16th amendment, a new agency was sired to "help" reticent citizens "volunteer" personal, private income data, the Internal Revenue Service. And such a "service" it provides! If the IRS suspects tax cheating it can: garnish wages, freeze bank accounts, seize assets and in general make life hell for its "customers". Over the amendment's existence, citizens of the United States have been harassed, hounded, and in some cases, driven to suicide for failing to pay their "fair" share to the government. Never mind due process, innocent until proven guilty or other such tripe. The 16th amendment horribly contradicts other parts of the Constitution, such as depriving citizens of property without a trial. These things make one yearn for the good old days of taxation without representation under Great Britain. The diminution of individual rights is sordid enough but by no means the only effect of the 16th amendment. The income tax has served to raise costs on the very people made poorer by paying the taxes in the first place. The government is able to finance great agencies that cause prices to increase artificially: milk subsidies raise the price of dairy products as do a whole host of similar subsidies in other industries; medical care costs have spiraled since the inception of Medicare and Medicaid; housing costs have ballooned astronomically, in part due to government support of unions, underwriting of loans and special tax write-offs for mortgage interest. I could mention OSHA, EPA, minimum wage and a thousand other regulations but you get the point. The tax system often makes us pay twice. Lest we overlook another point regarding taxpayers: they pay taxes so that others can have material things that the taxpayer himself may not be able to afford. Housing instantly springs to mind. Poor folks (i.e., unproductive folks) move into government subsidized housing while the hapless taxpayer struggles to save for a down payment, a process made more difficult by the act of paying taxes. Many persons work but have no health care coverage. Not so with those refusing to work at all. Still other taxpayers struggle to capitalize a business while their fellow citizens stop at the Small Business Administration for government financing of their start-up costs. Poor mom and pop farmers feed at the government trough to save their acres of land while a struggling taxpayer in the big city lives on a sliver of land called an apartment. At the philosophic level there is something morally repugnant in forcing people who get off their butt and work for a living to pay for that privilege. Life can be trying to say the least but when one works, prospers and finally succeeds it is a travesty to levy a tax on that person's "good fortune". No working person should have to look over their shoulder to see where the taxman is hiding. The income tax system makes citizens angry at their government, and distrustful to boot. It makes enemies of people who vie to place tax burdens on their fellow countrymen. It divides the nation into permanent classes of the "haves" versus the "have-nots", divisions that accentuate envy and ill will among the populace. Finally I note that taxing income is hardly fair as it fails miserably as a barometer of who should pay what. With great envy (see above paragraph) I calculate that for the year 2003 I paid a higher income tax rate than ketchup nabob Theresa "Heinz Inheritance" Kerry (me, 20% average rate on income of 200k, Ms. Kerry, 11.5%, on income of 5.1M). Her fabulous wealth immune from government pillage, she smugly endorses taxation on others so that all below her can be equally poor. I marvel continuously that such a system would ever employ the term "fair" as an adjective. Of course the income tax system is not fair, has never been fair, and indeed can never be fair. As the Ms. Kerry example demonstrates, our tax system is based on the faulty premise that a person's income can be arbitrarily classified to produce a tax that affects all taxpayers equitably. A person making $200,000 in San Francisco may be worse off financially than a rustic living in Idaho on an income of $30,000. Net worth is the true measure of wealth, not income. The solution to these systemic injustices is not to tweak the tax code so that Ms. Kerry pays more. The solution is to scrap the entire system. Anything that has had one hundred years to prove itself and fails to do so is, well, a failure. Dismally so. The efforts of our great people must be directed toward invention, business and improving life rather than filling tax forms, hiring accountants and fighting the government. Work must always be rewarded. So let us begin the fight against freedom's enemies by finally making gross -minus net-pay equal to zero. About the Author: Mr. Michael Marriott has been in the information technology field for nineteen years. He has worked for some large companies in the capacity of consultant including Allstate insurance, Transamerica Financial and Saudi Aramco. Mr. Michael Marriott writes for Capitalism Magazine. -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0